*CNN:* President Hitler, why do you want to force Project 2025 on this country. *Trump:* I don't even know what it is? Do you? *CNN:* No I don't, and I don't want our viewers to know either.
@@theemperorsnake1679 they creators didn't say Trump created it. They said they wanted to generate a new conservative movement based on the momentum of Trump.... similar to Reagan. Hence why the said they want to tie this to the support of Trump......but this isn't a trump document. It's like saying Biden wrote and supported the policy papers of a pro-Lgbt organization because they want to use support for Biden to get their way. The actual document clearly says it's a blueprint for any president. It's not even complex...it's really a series of essays and research papers if you read it
@ well at least then there was some reason I mean Covid was a deadly disease and there was significant opposition to Covid hysteria. It seemed like everyone the past few weeks was genuinely thinking America would turn into the handmaiden tale if Trump won
@@Demonos3 Covid was quite real. It was overhyped, but the chinese definitely made the virus, and it definitely got out of their lab. But in reality, it was no more deadly than any other new mutation that springs up.
@@Demonos3 Covid was at least an illness that some people died from. The response was largely incompetent and authoritarian, but back then you wouldn't be stupid for being afraid of covid. So yeah, still, this would probably be the biggest case of mass hysteria if we limit it to things that you really have no reason to be afraid of.
There's people on the left who think part of it is to bad same-sex marriage. Since it was over 900 pages long, I decided to find out if the rumor was true by pressing control+F and looking for the word "marriage" in it. IIRC, the word "marriage" appeared about 46 times, which felt manageable to look through. None of those mentions even brought up same-sex marriage; a lot of the time, "marriage" appeared in the context of the Federal government modifying its aid programs to _encourage_ marriage in the recipients.
The Heritage Foundation was probably both happily surprised and extremely confused when their document became so widely discussed. "We have published these for decades and nobody has ever read one before. They still haven't read our 2025 version, but at least they are talking about it".
Yha y’all are cultist and didn’t y’all said Trump has nothing to do with Project 25 before the election and how y’all kept saying it’s not part of the republicans agenda but now y’all are trying to say it’s good, 😂😂😂
@jred4511 why is this a response to my post? I have never even read project 2025, let alone endorse it. It is 900 pages long, so I assume it espouses some positions that I would agree with and others that I disagree with. I prefer to debate individual policies or issues rather than complete platforms, especially when it is the platform of some random think tank rather than an actual candidate.
Project 2025 is Heritage's "wish list to Santa". Which means a bunch of good stuff, and a bunch of nutty stuff. Oh and Heritage has written one of these every 4 years at least since the Reagan administration.
Even I take anything they say with a healthy helping of salt. Just another narcissist's scapegoat and it kind of worked. At least not in their favor at least. It shown us how many people are either ill informed or mentally troubled, or even both.
that's what i hate about the left's paranoia on project 2025. there is some good, some bad, but what matters is that it wasn't even remotely trump's equivalent to Hitler's mein kampf or Marx's Communist manifesto! like you said, it was more like a wish list to santa!
Its not even really a wish list so much as a "this or that" debate list, it tends to have two contending milquetoast "conservative" policy suggestions and proposes a simply debate over them.
IT IS NOT REAL!! Holy Friggen A, People will see things and brains just shut down these days. Project 2025 was a meme scare tactic by dems to make you not vote for trump. That is all it ever was. The fact people still think it is real shows how far IQ for the average person has dropped off a cliff in our society. No one does research, Just take all you are told at face value huh.
This project 2025 thing just proves that you can lie about anything and get away with it because the source is way to time consuming and difficult to understand for most normies.
If anything it proves how stupid democrats are. It’s not in difficult to read language. Most people (especially Dems) are just too stupid to get through it.
@gabrielc7861 Exactly that. Most people just don't have the time to do everything they need to do, every day, much less when emergencies come up. Which makes taking several hours of time they never have to read a several hundred page document, in addition to taking notes so they can follow along.
The very term "conspiracy theorist" was coined by the CIA to silence, intimidate, discredit and discourage anyone who dared to investigate JFK's assassination. _Let that sink the fuck in._
This is a 3 minute video that lacks any serious information. Although partially right, it intentionally leaves out a lot of things. While it's true that Project 2025 doesn't propose to monitor pregnant women, this idea comes from it's original proposal to repeal policies that the Biden Administration implemented post-Dobbs to protect the medical information and privacy of women seeking abortion. And to ---- “ensure doctors and other medical providers and health plans know that, with limited exceptions, they are not required - and in many cases, are not permitted - to disclose patients’ private information, including to law enforcement.” The administration later finalized a rule to shield the medical records of patients from criminal investigations if they cross state lines to seek an abortion where it is legal. From Project 2025's own document: _OCR should withdraw its Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) 86 guidance on abortion. OCR should withdraw its June 2022 guidance 87 that purports to address patient privacy concerns following the Dobbs decision but is actually a politicized statement in favor of abortion and against Dobbs.”_ *Mandate for Leadership p. 497* And while it is true that 2025 isn't explicitly a blueprint that Donald Trump is using, it is also true that a lot of his advisers and administration, especially his former administration, worked on Project 2025. Trump said that he wasn't going to do Project 2025, but at the same time lied about knowing about it. And now he's trying to do things like Schedule F, mass deportation, appointing loyalists, etc. While it is most certainly an exaggeration that people will end up in "concentration camps," it is not totally unreasonable for people to be worried about it. The Heritage Foundation isn't just any normal think tank, it has quite the amount of political influence.
Fun fact about Project 2025. Close to the beginning it says it wants to ban adult content BUT around 800 pages later it's actually against banning or restricting adult content and says that instead the FTC should create educational websites for parents because it should be their responsibility. It's not even consistent within itself
@@vanilla8956 Well with 900 pages of text the writers themselves wold already get lost, just like every politician. Remember that neocons like Mike Pence and Kevin Roberts are part of Heritage
From what I can tell, a large part of 2025 is also an internal debate by right wing thought schools. Essentially there are multiple different approaches to most of the main discussed issues. The goal is to have at least one of the solutions picked on each of the topics even if they don't all come from the same school of thought.
@@cursedhfy3558 That is very smart, still a porn ban would result in a government department with a prudish ideology and unhinged world veiw censoring much like the Comics Code.
Its not about being consistent, but it actually simply gives a debate on policies, resulting in a lot of cases where it can suggest distinct avenues for policies that oppose each other, its not intended even really to be a policy handbook, but more a guideline of debate and suggestions from all sides of the "right wing conservative" spectrum for reducing the impact of the federal bureaucracy. (it does not however reduce the bureaucracy, just its impact) The thing its actually valuable for is being a very extensive report on the function and behavior of most of the departments of the federal government, its a lot more valuable for that then it is as a policy platform because it pretty much advises nothing in order to fix the problems we currently have.
@@Spartan322 I understand this. I just wish all of my former "friends" who are screaming and crying in fear of it also were able to understand this. My comment was really aimed at anyone who may have clicked on the video and just went to look at the comments to argue
@@HawkAnomalyit depends cuz from what I heard some of my relatives left this country since they thought being that there Muslim they thought they were gonna get kicked out for practicing a religion.. probably the samething happened to the person here who commented probably for a different reason though.
If only they made Project 2025 shorter! I have “stop project 2025” posters hung up at my school, so this project 2025 conundrum from the left is real. Good video 👍
To be fair, very few people would willingly read a 900 page document unless A. It was an absolute requirement, B. It was very important that they do read it, or C. They are a masochist, so i dont blame people for not reading it, but with that said, fie people to criticize something for merely being directed toward Trump is absurd, especially when Trump didnt really read it himself.
@coreyshapiro2440 Well at least trump can read, Kamala can barely read the script that she wrote for herself and Joe doesn't even know what he's reading.
@@GhostfaceRocks I haven't noticed any evidence of Trump reading anything substantial. At least Kamala is capable of writing a script for herself. Trump just comes up with bs on the spot.
My favorite project 2025 meme was the "noooo" screaming girl in a straight jacket with a doctor asking, "is Project 2025 in the room with us right now?"
Limited direct democracy actually works quite well in Switzerland with important petitions usually having a sensible outcome. But Swiss people actually read more.
Mabe if U.S. citizens were required to recieve military training and keep theulir weapon at home, likebthe Swiss, we'd be better off. @@ChristianWagner888
probably because nobody but the paranoid leftists gave a rat's ass about it. it was never a game plan, literally just a bunch of suggestions for trump.
MentisWave made a video on it pretty early on in Kamala's campaign. It's pretty much turning every corrupt donkey department into a corrupt elephant department. Just repeating their mistakes was their plan.
The book is just so nothing for the most part Its litterly just what most republicans already want in a pros and cons list with dry debates over certian conflicts It also includes some bonus objectives in the case they get a republican majorty such as axing certian federal agencies Nothing extreme the lgbtq community not mentioned once and the most extreme opionion mentioned is a ban on adult content which the book even condems instead arguing in favor of a program to educate parents about monitoring their kids online It really is just a nothing burger
Still waiting for: Project 1981, Project 1985, Project 1989, Project 1993, Project 1997, Project 2001, Project 2005, Project 2009, Project 2013, Project 2017, Project 2021, Project 2025. As we can see, none of those mandate for leadership “projects” ever came true, nothing more than suggestions, on top of a smear campaign of some kind.
Or they are old enough to remember when Bill Clinton played the sax on a talk show (I think it was the Arsenio Hall show), which is why it is part of the Animaniacs theme. ^_^
They also had the head of The Heritage Foundation explain that Trump actually cant be involved with any part of Project 2025 because that would cause them to lose their non profit tax status.
You still don't know the full story on this. Bear in mind that this channel isn't exactly impartial either. They've got a rather extreme conservative bias. Note that this video really only presented the most extreme left wing fears, while downplaying the more extreme elements of the document or ignoring them entirely. It also presented the strawman that people who are opposed to Project 2025's goals think that Trump was behind the whole thing.. while entirely neglecting the very real outcome that various people behind the ideas in the document will be put into positions of power by a Trump administration, where they will proceed to implement those ideas. Trump himself doesn't have to have anything to do with the document for his being elected to result in the implementation of the ideas in the document.
Exactly. If Trump wanted anything to do with Project 2025, he would've shouted it out and made it central to his campaign. He not only didn't do any of that, he came out outright and said "I never read it, but even I think it's not gonna work"
“Oh but some of Trump’s conservatives allies were a part of the heritage foundation!” So a bunch of standard conservatives were a part of or associated with a well established conservative think tank? Egads.
Trump is a fucking liar. He says he knows nothing about Project 2025 but then says some of the things are “abyssmal and ridiculous”. If he knows nothing about it, he shouldn’t know whether or not he agrees with it
@@Ronnie.Raymond Way to miss the point by 150 miles there, boss. Whether it’s just people he’s associated with or people that he’s directly appointed, trying to transmogrify that association into some conspiratorial conglomeration is like claiming Ted Cruz has direct access to the nuclear football because he happens to go golfing with Trump on occasion. I don’t think you paid much attention to the fact that the Project 2025 wishlist not only doesn’t direct Trump’s policies, but actively contradicts some of it, for better *and* worse. I’m sure even Ben Shapiro has had association with the Heritage Foundation but I don’t exactly see lil Benny drafting Trump’s foreign policy for him. Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure he’s influenced to some extent by his cabinet members and I’m sure at least some of that comes straight from the HF playbook, but Trump is a big boy and largely makes his own decisions. People trying to play this up like it’s some kind of conspiracy that Trump has people in his circle that are connected to, again, a very well know conservative think-tank, is plainly ridiculous. Combine that with how exaggerated and flat out slandered the document in question is, it’s quite obvious that it’s merely a ploy to discredit Trump by association to a stupid suggestion book that, much like Trump himself, isn’t a fraction as bad as his opponents make it out to be. He could pick every single cabinet member directly from the membership page of the heritage foundation and it still wouldn’t necessarily mean a damn thing other than he’s possibly a little chummier with neo-cons than I’d be comfortable with.
Man, this was educational. I didn't know about how this was made by a think tank or that they have been doing for decades. Thanks for the content, we need more of this kind of thing.
A think tank that's as old as big mountain. Jokes aside it's amazing how many judges and lawyers are members of that organization. Certain people don't get nominated without it. IDK who. Being a nonmember.
I've had to be the voice of reason in my social circles as the only one who's read any part of project 2025. it's been a headache trying to get people to understand what it is and how it has just as much to do with trump as it does any other candidate, which is to say not much. Now I have a convenient link I can send people that explains everything in a cohesive and reasonable way.
Technically speaking i do recall early 2025 properganda stating it was for Any Republican candidate. Never needed Trump, just the right wing to implement.
I need a 20 minute video like this for the few (1) leftist friends who haven’t excommunicated me but are still freaking out about this specific document.
Got cut off with a friend of 38 years because I asked her to explain why any gay couples needed to fear their marriages being undone by the state. I legit had no idea that was the media claiming it was part of project 2025 until this video, because she didn't respond and hasn't spoken to me since.
@@LizRealGirlBeauty Be forgiving to your friend if they ever turn around; it's not just this year, they have a whole life time of left wing media lies to digest, hopefully Trump is right, success brings us all together, ends the propaganda and censorship machine and we all get back to normalcy.
Don't we all, being gaslight by both sides is continuing to rip the country in half. It's all culture wars. Idioligon and pandering. To each there own...
I'd say that's a decent start point. But it certainly shouldn't be your end point. Considering project 2025 is far from great, containing both good, bad, and very bad ideas.
I still have no idea what is actually contained in the proposal. Wish I could find an accurate summary of what it entails that doesn't require me to go through the whole thing to understand what it calls for.
@@melvinlemay7366 It's 900 pages. I'm sure if you search up on youtube you can get SOME sort of an overview, but don't expect it to be short. Again, 900 freaking pages of policy proposals, there's basically no way to condense it to under 3 hours if you don't want to skip massive chunks of it. This is precisely why it made for such an effective boogeyman - because people couldn't just easily educate themselves on it.
@@curveball135 It's very likely to be coincidental. People from thinktanks are very commonly picked for various agencies upon the dawn of a new administration.
I agree with most all of this video, save for the end This is pretty dishonest in the end. P2025's danger is less the explicit text and more the implications behind them. One of P2025's policies involve the removal of welfare programs such as free lunches in schools. Then later in the document there is talk of producing more heavy weaponry. Where do you think that money is coming from. The heritage foundation thinks we should take money from starving children and invest that cash into building the US military. We do not need more bomb, the US military is already one of if not the biggest militaries on the planet. Maybe we should fix our own internal problems instead of pushing towards arming ourselves more
How many times did Trump say "I have zero idea what the hell that is."? "Well a bunch of people that know him seem to know what it is!" Ok, so people that worked for him inthe past did a video presentation, and?
Ok, so why did trump pick Russel Vought to be the director of the Office of Management and Budget, who wrote the second chapter in Project 2025, which is about enhancing the power of the executive office by dismantling the administrative state , slashing budgets and eliminating the independence of some regulatory agencies. Or Stephen Miller as deputy chief of staff and Trumps Homeland Security advisor, who founded America First Legal, one of the groups that served on the project 2025 Advisory Board, and there’s Brendan Carr, Trump’s pick to be chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, who wrote the chapter in Project 2025 about the FCC. And Tom Homan, who is a 2025 contributor who is expected to lead out the mass deportation effort. John Ratcliffe and Pete Hoekstra are also listed as contributors to Project 2025. They’ve been tapped as CIA director and ambassador to Canada, respectively. Not to mention that the president of the Heritage foundation called JD Vance “one of the leaders - if not the leader - of our movement.”. If Trump is truly trying to “distance himself from Project 2025”, he’s doing an awful job at it by many people associated with the project and the heritage foundation.
So you're telling me a republican president picked republican members who contributed to a republican wishlist? The only thing that sounds bad in your comment is the mass deportation effort. Everything else sounds like fear mongering.
@@alittledeezer6415 So he doesn't even know the people he's hiring for the most important jobs in the USA. Is that what you voted for? An uninformed president? What do you get out of this?
I've learned two things about America over the course of this year 1. We spend way too much time on social media 2. When we're told to be afraid of something, we'll just be afraid of it even if theres no reason to be
@@BackroomsBoithe whole point of the video was that Trump was not going to use projects 2025 and liberals were crazy, liberals are still crazy but Trump is using project 2025
They made the scare tactics so bizarre they became completely unbelievable. Like police being allowed to ask for cards from women to determine if they’re menstruating. It doesn’t even make logical sense.
Tracking every pregnancy? Yeah, I don't think so. Not sure who people think is organized enough to take on a project like that, but it's just not going to happen. I'm not even sure every pregnant woman knows she's pregnant.
Honestly, it would be weird if a conservative president ran a campaign and none of their policies overlapped with a conservative think tank's wish list. So when something does overlap they scream that project 2025 was his platform.
This is why i ignored all media about it. Never heard of it until the leftist media started ceying about it. Knew it was all bs when every news outlet parroted the same shit.
"Bhooo, Trump is going to make scary sounding thing a reality!!" Every liberal with toddler mind that warns you about disinformation Me: "I've seen better attempts at misinformation when I was 14, you are lame amateurs"
And 90% of the Mandate for Leadership conforms to the pattern of: "This is Government Agency A. Its stated responsibilities and structure are X and Y. Here are our recommendations for reforms, along with some alternative/optional reforms, with our reasoning for them and associated intended outcomes." "This is Government Agency B....."
He should've because that's what his party and SELF APPOINTED cabinet members are trying to push. It would be nice to have a president that knew what he was dealing with, no?
Wait, so they got fact checked and turned out to be false? Someone needs to tell the Harris Campaign and FFPAC, because that’s all their election commercials kept repeating to the point of being nauseating
Bruh there are hundreds of reddit treads about project 2025 that all regurgitate the same lies, I like reddit for game discussions, but sadly it is very politically left wing leaning.
Nah Fr that’s why I stay away from Reddit most of the time. I would go on Reddit for solutions to a problem or something because they have everything on there or questions I have on my mind. Now they’re just spreading the same repeated information about how Trump is a fascist and justify ending relationships with someone just cause they support Trump
@NoCluYT considering they claim that project 2025 is trumps plan and it will remove womens rights, deport legal and illegal immigrants, and enslave black people. Project 2025 was NOT made by trump, it was made by a political think-tank, it is basically a bunch of suggestions, Trump did confirm that some are pretty unreasonable, but there are also decent suggestions. Almost every president had a project (insert year) and Kamal failed to mention that she also would have gotten a project 2025 if she had won the election, Project 2025 is 900 pages long and it would be a lengthy read, but I'm pretty sure you can find it online.
I made this same argument to users on a different social media platform and the admins of the page kept deleting my posts. It was like they were determined to believe the lie no matter what the facts were.
anytime you hear someone mention how P25 is so horrible, ask them which part they're most afraid of. then laugh, because you can pretty much guarantee they say something that isn't even in it.
I’ll be honest I think this country could use a little bit of a theocracy. I know it sounds extreme, but we’ve got women on only fans thinking that it’s a career. We are truly lost and we need to find the light again. Child sacrifice has become mainstream need I say more.
@@henrynelson9301Not so true at all... even though the president revoked it, the law is still intact, so even though the president revoked it, he does not have the power to eliminate it..
@@henrynelson9301Well, to revoke It means to revoke or annul A decision. While removing It is to abolish Or delete. That is to say that if something is revoked, the law is still in force as opposed to being eliminated..
Its a big detailed report/proposal on how wasteful and ineffective the different government proposals and programs are with a roadmap on how to correct them and make government more effective with a vague christian flavoring in parts. Its a really dull read.
Everyone is talking about it, but no ones actually talking about it and all they seem to care about is that its writen by a non LGBT group. Its really a butter knife, but people are calling it an AK to put how people act towards it into proportion.
I’d really like to hear or read some nuance about this. Unfortunately, browsing the past videos of this channel I’m not really confident about the impartiality. And saying that most of the 900 pages of p2025 doesn’t consist of extreme ideas is no guarantee that still a serious part does.
Update: Reading articles of the Heritage foundation it took me 3 minutes to find opinions that will impact people’s freedom rather seriously. Yet you say that the very people that have contributed to these articles making part of the upcoming regime will not interfere with our personal freedoms. I’m a bit sceptical about that.
I've been stuck in an echochamber for awhile. Initially I mistrusted you, since you only seemed to mock the other side of the argument. But this was fairly reassuring and put some of my anxieties to rest. I certainly don't trust Trump, but I hope you folks are right about making improving America. At the end of the day, we're all still brothers. We share the same country, same culture, and the only real divide in our country is from religion and politics. With the election over, lets try and pull together again. Bury the hatchet. Just remember. Humans are an emotional mess, and deeply illogical. Presenting new info to change viewpoints will rarely work. To any conservatives looking to debate liberals, remember to be empathetic to our side, respectful, and genuinely open to new ideas. A debate is a mutual exchange to help both parties learn.
@@solidstorm6129 This might surprise you, but fascists died back at the end of world war 2. I know it's a very obscure fact that only real history nerds will know, but it's kind of important...
@ irrelevant to my statement. But it is defined by Merriam Webster’s Dictionary as a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. Now, how is that impossible? Time period is irrelevant.
It's called dumbing it down without proper citations. Cause they got 10min. Over 900 pgs. And advertisers want Nothing to do with it. Mainstream media isn't setup to handle a document that big properly.
I agree, any political ramifications usually need to go through the 4 branches of government. Unless you're a Dictator who overthrow the branches of government with force or Diplomacy. "Palpatine"
It’s as simple as considering the source and their incentive - It always has been and always will be. A lot of of people are just very easily manipulated…. Love him or hate him trump is the closest thing to Anti corruption this country has seen in many many decades and that’s the only reason it’s gotten to this level of absurdity.
1:55 I will note that the probability that Trump follows* certain parts of it [edit: certain parts of it *as a result of the mandate*] might be more to a lot more likely now than it was for obama to follow his mandate [as a result] this time in 2008 or 2012.
Well yeah, in that Heritage Foundation is a pretty established conservative think tank, and Trump is, well, a conservative president with a conservative administration. There's bound to be some overlap, if only by accident.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Project 2025 funds lab experiments to create genetically manipulated chihuahuas that can say "Yo quiero Taco Bell."
First dibs!
Resident Spanish
I'll file that under the very rare "nonsensical waste of taxpayer money that nearly everyone is surprisingly okay with" category.
Since nobody is willing to read 900 pages to check for this,nobody can disprove this.
I've never eaten at Taco Bell but I loved that dog.
*CNN:* President Hitler, why do you want to force Project 2025 on this country.
*Trump:* I don't even know what it is? Do you?
*CNN:* No I don't, and I don't want our viewers to know either.
He literally said he hasn’t seen it, and then says that from what he has seen, he agrees. He literally said this on TV.
@@Ghent_Halcyon they creators of the project have sad that trump was a big part of it. you cant trust trump on a lot of things.
@@theemperorsnake1679 they creators didn't say Trump created it. They said they wanted to generate a new conservative movement based on the momentum of Trump.... similar to Reagan. Hence why the said they want to tie this to the support of Trump......but this isn't a trump document. It's like saying Biden wrote and supported the policy papers of a pro-Lgbt organization because they want to use support for Biden to get their way. The actual document clearly says it's a blueprint for any president. It's not even complex...it's really a series of essays and research papers if you read it
@@theemperorsnake1679 yea like that one time where he flooded the market with olpec oil?
My source is Mr. Global he worked with energy comps for years.
Project 2025 gotta be the biggest case of mass hysteria in recent history
Hmm.. I’d say C0v 1d was
Hahahaha... covid.
@ well at least then there was some reason I mean Covid was a deadly disease and there was significant opposition to Covid hysteria. It seemed like everyone the past few weeks was genuinely thinking America would turn into the handmaiden tale if Trump won
@@Demonos3 Covid was quite real.
It was overhyped, but the chinese definitely made the virus, and it definitely got out of their lab.
But in reality, it was no more deadly than any other new mutation that springs up.
@@Demonos3 Covid was at least an illness that some people died from. The response was largely incompetent and authoritarian, but back then you wouldn't be stupid for being afraid of covid. So yeah, still, this would probably be the biggest case of mass hysteria if we limit it to things that you really have no reason to be afraid of.
The second the MSM has called it a blueprint for a Fascist Theocracy I knew it was gonna be something good.
Even the lies that the Left perpetuated about it was kind of based.
I really wished the Heritage Foundation DID ask for some of those things!!
There's people on the left who think part of it is to bad same-sex marriage. Since it was over 900 pages long, I decided to find out if the rumor was true by pressing control+F and looking for the word "marriage" in it. IIRC, the word "marriage" appeared about 46 times, which felt manageable to look through. None of those mentions even brought up same-sex marriage; a lot of the time, "marriage" appeared in the context of the Federal government modifying its aid programs to _encourage_ marriage in the recipients.
@@GLASSMOSCOWANDBEIJING not sure where my original comment went 🤣🤣🤣
RUclips censorship strike again
@@GLASSMOSCOWANDBEIJING test reply
@@GLASSMOSCOWANDBEIJING reply testing
The Heritage Foundation was probably both happily surprised and extremely confused when their document became so widely discussed.
"We have published these for decades and nobody has ever read one before. They still haven't read our 2025 version, but at least they are talking about it".
They say there's no such thing as bad publicity; I don't believe that, but ppl DO say that.
Yha y’all are cultist and didn’t y’all said Trump has nothing to do with Project 25 before the election and how y’all kept saying it’s not part of the republicans agenda but now y’all are trying to say it’s good, 😂😂😂
@jred4511 why is this a response to my post? I have never even read project 2025, let alone endorse it. It is 900 pages long, so I assume it espouses some positions that I would agree with and others that I disagree with. I prefer to debate individual policies or issues rather than complete platforms, especially when it is the platform of some random think tank rather than an actual candidate.
😂😂
@@harmonicarchipelgo9351 wait, so he was talking to us?
Project 2025 is Heritage's "wish list to Santa". Which means a bunch of good stuff, and a bunch of nutty stuff. Oh and Heritage has written one of these every 4 years at least since the Reagan administration.
Even I take anything they say with a healthy helping of salt. Just another narcissist's scapegoat and it kind of worked. At least not in their favor at least. It shown us how many people are either ill informed or mentally troubled, or even both.
Good summary of the video, thanks
that's what i hate about the left's paranoia on project 2025. there is some good, some bad, but what matters is that it wasn't even remotely trump's equivalent to Hitler's mein kampf or Marx's Communist manifesto! like you said, it was more like a wish list to santa!
Its not even really a wish list so much as a "this or that" debate list, it tends to have two contending milquetoast "conservative" policy suggestions and proposes a simply debate over them.
IT IS NOT REAL!! Holy Friggen A, People will see things and brains just shut down these days. Project 2025 was a meme scare tactic by dems to make you not vote for trump. That is all it ever was. The fact people still think it is real shows how far IQ for the average person has dropped off a cliff in our society. No one does research, Just take all you are told at face value huh.
This project 2025 thing just proves that you can lie about anything and get away with it because the source is way to time consuming and difficult to understand for most normies.
"Eternal vigilance is the cost of liberty"
Then isn't it quite the problem that *we don't have any* ?
@@KingRandor82
The irony is that many don't have the liberty to be eternally vigilant.
If anything it proves how stupid democrats are.
It’s not in difficult to read language. Most people (especially Dems) are just too stupid to get through it.
@gabrielc7861 Exactly that. Most people just don't have the time to do everything they need to do, every day, much less when emergencies come up. Which makes taking several hours of time they never have to read a several hundred page document, in addition to taking notes so they can follow along.
Basically "My source? Look it up, it's on the internet bruh trust me"
And they called us conspiracy theorists....
@@pigzcanfly444 And Election Deniers
The very term "conspiracy theorist" was coined by the CIA to silence, intimidate, discredit and discourage anyone who dared to investigate JFK's assassination. _Let that sink the fuck in._
This is a 3 minute video that lacks any serious information. Although partially right, it intentionally leaves out a lot of things. While it's true that Project 2025 doesn't propose to monitor pregnant women, this idea comes from it's original proposal to repeal policies that the Biden Administration implemented post-Dobbs to protect the medical information and privacy of women seeking abortion.
And to ---- “ensure doctors and other medical providers and health plans know that, with limited exceptions, they are not required - and in many cases, are not permitted - to disclose patients’ private information, including to law enforcement.” The administration later finalized a rule to shield the medical records of patients from criminal investigations if they cross state lines to seek an abortion where it is legal.
From Project 2025's own document:
_OCR should withdraw its Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) 86 guidance on abortion. OCR should withdraw its June 2022 guidance 87 that purports to address patient privacy concerns following the Dobbs decision but is actually a politicized statement in favor of abortion and against Dobbs.”_
*Mandate for Leadership p. 497*
And while it is true that 2025 isn't explicitly a blueprint that Donald Trump is using, it is also true that a lot of his advisers and administration, especially his former administration, worked on Project 2025. Trump said that he wasn't going to do Project 2025, but at the same time lied about knowing about it. And now he's trying to do things like Schedule F, mass deportation, appointing loyalists, etc.
While it is most certainly an exaggeration that people will end up in "concentration camps," it is not totally unreasonable for people to be worried about it. The Heritage Foundation isn't just any normal think tank, it has quite the amount of political influence.
Trump said the eleciton was rigged. how does it feel to be lied to by your God Emperor?
"Always accuse your enemies of what you yourself are doing"
We’ll start off project ‘25 by making everyone say “Merry Christmas.”
Yes
Change Reeses Trees back to Christmas Trees!
I can get behind that
@@jeffpadilla9891 chocolate and peanutbuttery christmas trees?
KEEP IT!!!!!!!!!!
Happy holidays!
Fun fact about Project 2025. Close to the beginning it says it wants to ban adult content BUT around 800 pages later it's actually against banning or restricting adult content and says that instead the FTC should create educational websites for parents because it should be their responsibility. It's not even consistent within itself
@@vanilla8956 Well with 900 pages of text the writers themselves wold already get lost, just like every politician. Remember that neocons like Mike Pence and Kevin Roberts are part of Heritage
From what I can tell, a large part of 2025 is also an internal debate by right wing thought schools. Essentially there are multiple different approaches to most of the main discussed issues. The goal is to have at least one of the solutions picked on each of the topics even if they don't all come from the same school of thought.
@@cursedhfy3558 That is very smart, still a porn ban would result in a government department with a prudish ideology and unhinged world veiw censoring much like the Comics Code.
Its not about being consistent, but it actually simply gives a debate on policies, resulting in a lot of cases where it can suggest distinct avenues for policies that oppose each other, its not intended even really to be a policy handbook, but more a guideline of debate and suggestions from all sides of the "right wing conservative" spectrum for reducing the impact of the federal bureaucracy. (it does not however reduce the bureaucracy, just its impact) The thing its actually valuable for is being a very extensive report on the function and behavior of most of the departments of the federal government, its a lot more valuable for that then it is as a policy platform because it pretty much advises nothing in order to fix the problems we currently have.
@@Spartan322 I understand this. I just wish all of my former "friends" who are screaming and crying in fear of it also were able to understand this. My comment was really aimed at anyone who may have clicked on the video and just went to look at the comments to argue
I lost a friend because of the paranoia of project 2025. Guess their ideals are more important than our relationship
Exact same thing happened to me. Wish I could've showed them this video before they cut me off like that.
Eh…AI Relationship Apps are better than F&B relationships anyway.
@@oriongear2499 Bet you have a really strong right hand, too. 😊😅😂
I can't stress this enough. They were never your friend.
Real friends dont abandon each other over political leaning.
@@HawkAnomalyit depends cuz from what I heard some of my relatives left this country since they thought being that there Muslim they thought they were gonna get kicked out for practicing a religion.. probably the samething happened to the person here who commented probably for a different reason though.
If only they made Project 2025 shorter! I have “stop project 2025” posters hung up at my school, so this project 2025 conundrum from the left is real. Good video 👍
BlueAnon conspiracy theories 😂
To be fair, very few people would willingly read a 900 page document unless A. It was an absolute requirement, B. It was very important that they do read it, or C. They are a masochist, so i dont blame people for not reading it, but with that said, fie people to criticize something for merely being directed toward Trump is absurd, especially when Trump didnt really read it himself.
The Harris campaign had that little going on so they had to run with this.
To be fair, Trump has never read anything himself.
@coreyshapiro2440 Well at least trump can read, Kamala can barely read the script that she wrote for herself and Joe doesn't even know what he's reading.
@@GhostfaceRocks I haven't noticed any evidence of Trump reading anything substantial. At least Kamala is capable of writing a script for herself. Trump just comes up with bs on the spot.
@coreyshapiro2440 Well that bs won over half the voting population.
Finally, a Project 2025 video that DOESN'T prioritize fear...
Wonder why…
@@solidstorm6129maybe because Shamus is not some far leftie who is divorced from reality.
@@solidstorm6129 I can't believe how evil Obama's blueprint for fascism Project 2005 was...
Mentiswave went over it and basically concluded the media was full of 💩
@@Leonard_Wolf_2056 sure he is. Or, more likely, he doesn’t really want to get into why people are freaking out about this project.
I saw it as another scare tactic like Russia.
The left is still using that tactic with Tulsi Gabbard, among others.
Russia-russia-russia!
Remind me to worry when Alaska is under attack. No, not threat, attack.
@@uss-dh7909 yea especially with a president who blabbers alot of secrets that the American people are not supposed to know.
My favorite project 2025 meme was the "noooo" screaming girl in a straight jacket with a doctor asking, "is Project 2025 in the room with us right now?"
Every day I'm reminded why direct democracy is a TERRIBLE idea...
It's basically anarchy, which is what these beings want.
No thanks, I'll keep my constitutional republic.
Limited direct democracy actually works quite well in Switzerland with important petitions usually having a sensible outcome. But Swiss people actually read more.
@@ChristianWagner888 yea, my ma taught me how to read first, tho I do need to comprehend on what I'm reading tho.
@@ChristianWagner888 Not all cultures work the same, what works in other countries might not work well in America.
Mabe if U.S. citizens were required to recieve military training and keep theulir weapon at home, likebthe Swiss, we'd be better off. @@ChristianWagner888
No wonder I had no idea what it was. I watch all the conservative media and no one was talking about it ever.
To be fair, they haven't mentioned BRICS either...
probably because nobody but the paranoid leftists gave a rat's ass about it. it was never a game plan, literally just a bunch of suggestions for trump.
@@KingRandor82 BRICS is destined to fall apart. No one is gonna take that seriously.
MentisWave made a video on it pretty early on in Kamala's campaign.
It's pretty much turning every corrupt donkey department into a corrupt elephant department. Just repeating their mistakes was their plan.
The book is just so nothing for the most part
Its litterly just what most republicans already want in a pros and cons list with dry debates over certian conflicts
It also includes some bonus objectives in the case they get a republican majorty such as axing certian federal agencies
Nothing extreme the lgbtq community not mentioned once and the most extreme opionion mentioned is a ban on adult content which the book even condems instead arguing in favor of a program to educate parents about monitoring their kids online
It really is just a nothing burger
We must stop Project 2017
Still waiting for: Project 1981, Project 1985, Project 1989, Project 1993, Project 1997, Project 2001, Project 2005, Project 2009, Project 2013, Project 2017, Project 2021, Project 2025.
As we can see, none of those mandate for leadership “projects” ever came true, nothing more than suggestions, on top of a smear campaign of some kind.
Too late for that
1:20 Bill Clinton playing the sax! Someone watches Animaniacs!😂
Or they are old enough to remember when Bill Clinton played the sax on a talk show (I think it was the Arsenio Hall show), which is why it is part of the Animaniacs theme. ^_^
Bill Clinton was well known for playing saxaphone in the 90s.
We know Seamus does, since he dressed Kamala like Chun LI, but still...
@@rwberger6 "playing the saxophone" so that's what you kids call it nowadays. 😜
@@NogardCodesmithyou are correct! It was Arsenio Hall!
Why do I get the feeling that I will need this on Thanksgiving?
Thanks Seamus.
How'd it go? 😅
Did you need it? Was it helpful?
Ah yes, Project 2025. The list of policies that Trump was going to enact, that wasn't written by Trump and was a list of suggestions
The only thing Trump is capable of writing is tweets.
@@coreyshapiro2440cope harder
@@coreyshapiro2440 wrong but ok
Written by 2020 cabinet members and others
@@coreyshapiro2440no Truths! 😂
They also had the head of The Heritage Foundation explain that Trump actually cant be involved with any part of Project 2025 because that would cause them to lose their non profit tax status.
Trump can still be involved without money, y'know.
@ Same can be said for Harris with The Center for American Progress
2020 cabinet members wrote chapters, that's how "Trump" is involved. Figuratively, NOT literally.
@@brotherchris01tuche.
@@night_hunter4752 when conservatives are in a conservative think tank
I didn't even know the full story on this. Thanks for bringing it to light!
I think you should read more of it. There’s more extreme stuff in it.
@@ebonaparte3853 Im sure there are is
@@ebonaparte3853 like making Joe Biden take all the melanin from the black that didn't vote for him
You still don't know the full story on this. Bear in mind that this channel isn't exactly impartial either. They've got a rather extreme conservative bias. Note that this video really only presented the most extreme left wing fears, while downplaying the more extreme elements of the document or ignoring them entirely. It also presented the strawman that people who are opposed to Project 2025's goals think that Trump was behind the whole thing.. while entirely neglecting the very real outcome that various people behind the ideas in the document will be put into positions of power by a Trump administration, where they will proceed to implement those ideas. Trump himself doesn't have to have anything to do with the document for his being elected to result in the implementation of the ideas in the document.
@ I knew I wasn’t the only one thinking this channel leaned conservative.
If Trump wanted that, he would just say it upfront. Not even american and I know the guy
Exactly. If Trump wanted anything to do with Project 2025, he would've shouted it out and made it central to his campaign. He not only didn't do any of that, he came out outright and said "I never read it, but even I think it's not gonna work"
@@RipRLeeErmeyWhy did þe guys who wrote it said he did?
@@UpleenSandhu Nobody who wrote it said that Trump wrote it. Major mainstream news media lied when they said he wrote it
@@UpleenSandhu lies...
@@stevensmutko1408 so þe guy who works wiþ Project 2025 lied for what reason?
Short answer: Nope.
Long answer: If Matt Walsh is saying it's happening, it's not happening.
Matt Walsh is mid.
Who's Matt Walsh?
Basically a white ben shapiro@@MiniMinecon2006
Okay learned an lot today because of the video. So thanks for that Seamus
THANK YOU SEAMUS!!! I have been saying this for a while!
This aged brilliantly didn't it?
Nope, cope.
This video needs to be shared.
I felt this when anyone says this about project 2025 0:20
“Oh but some of Trump’s conservatives allies were a part of the heritage foundation!”
So a bunch of standard conservatives were a part of or associated with a well established conservative think tank? Egads.
>takes off helmet
*Gott In Himmel.*
>takes off Hat under it
*God in Himmel.*
>Unzips head.
*______*
Trump is a fucking liar. He says he knows nothing about Project 2025 but then says some of the things are “abyssmal and ridiculous”. If he knows nothing about it, he shouldn’t know whether or not he agrees with it
Not just conservative allies, people he specifically appointed. Even his VP pick wrote the foreword lol
@@Ronnie.Raymond
Way to miss the point by 150 miles there, boss.
Whether it’s just people he’s associated with or people that he’s directly appointed, trying to transmogrify that association into some conspiratorial conglomeration is like claiming Ted Cruz has direct access to the nuclear football because he happens to go golfing with Trump on occasion.
I don’t think you paid much attention to the fact that the Project 2025 wishlist not only doesn’t direct Trump’s policies, but actively contradicts some of it, for better *and* worse.
I’m sure even Ben Shapiro has had association with the Heritage Foundation but I don’t exactly see lil Benny drafting Trump’s foreign policy for him.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure he’s influenced to some extent by his cabinet members and I’m sure at least some of that comes straight from the HF playbook, but Trump is a big boy and largely makes his own decisions.
People trying to play this up like it’s some kind of conspiracy that Trump has people in his circle that are connected to, again, a very well know conservative think-tank, is plainly ridiculous.
Combine that with how exaggerated and flat out slandered the document in question is, it’s quite obvious that it’s merely a ploy to discredit Trump by association to a stupid suggestion book that, much like Trump himself, isn’t a fraction as bad as his opponents make it out to be.
He could pick every single cabinet member directly from the membership page of the heritage foundation and it still wouldn’t necessarily mean a damn thing other than he’s possibly a little chummier with neo-cons than I’d be comfortable with.
Man, this was educational. I didn't know about how this was made by a think tank or that they have been doing for decades. Thanks for the content, we need more of this kind of thing.
A think tank that's as old as big mountain.
Jokes aside it's amazing how many judges and lawyers are members of that organization.
Certain people don't get nominated without it. IDK who. Being a nonmember.
Timcast has an episode with the guy running the think tank. It's insightful
FINALLY.
I’ve been waiting for a video to explain this.
Especially in this cartoonish format.
Thanks man.
I've had to be the voice of reason in my social circles as the only one who's read any part of project 2025. it's been a headache trying to get people to understand what it is and how it has just as much to do with trump as it does any other candidate, which is to say not much. Now I have a convenient link I can send people that explains everything in a cohesive and reasonable way.
Its just a wishlist directed to Trump, nothing more.
Technically speaking i do recall early 2025 properganda stating it was for Any Republican candidate.
Never needed Trump, just the right wing to implement.
I need a 20 minute video like this for the few (1) leftist friends who haven’t excommunicated me but are still freaking out about this specific document.
Got cut off with a friend of 38 years because I asked her to explain why any gay couples needed to fear their marriages being undone by the state. I legit had no idea that was the media claiming it was part of project 2025 until this video, because she didn't respond and hasn't spoken to me since.
@@LizRealGirlBeautyA chance to get better friends.
@@LizRealGirlBeauty Be forgiving to your friend if they ever turn around; it's not just this year, they have a whole life time of left wing media lies to digest, hopefully Trump is right, success brings us all together, ends the propaganda and censorship machine and we all get back to normalcy.
Don't we all, being gaslight by both sides is continuing to rip the country in half. It's all culture wars. Idioligon and pandering.
To each there own...
I’m at the point where if the Left, Media, Hollyweird, and DNC are freaking out about it, then it must be a good thing for this nation and its people.
Yes. Anything these demons hiss at, I automatically assume it's good for the country and those of us who have more than 2 braincells.
As a leftist, I disagree
I'd say that's a decent start point. But it certainly shouldn't be your end point.
Considering project 2025 is far from great, containing both good, bad, and very bad ideas.
@@-landon931We’ll start by making you say “Merry Christmas.”
@@melissamurray8307
Project 2025 is when government forces you to enjoy your holidays again
0:28 didn’t even need the audio! XD
What’s he saying?
“Every word of what you just said was wrong”
It comes from Star Wars The Last Jedi
Even old and deconstructed Luke’s words are a good meme in spite of Mark Hamil, ironically.
@@camo6465except Hamill is a politically illiterate bigoted sellout sooooo
Nope, Trump has nothing to do with it
I mean that’s what they say in the video the title is more to grab your attention
Did you watch the video @@xygo6038
@@xygo6038 Agenda 47 is Trump's Plan
Technically...
project 2025 promised to break into my house and erase all of my nintendogs
NOT THE NINTENDOGS!!!
project 2025 promised to kick my tv and bully me at the playground
OH MY GOD THANK YOU FOR CLEARING THIS ALL UP! :)
I still have no idea what is actually contained in the proposal. Wish I could find an accurate summary of what it entails that doesn't require me to go through the whole thing to understand what it calls for.
@@melvinlemay7366 It's 900 pages. I'm sure if you search up on youtube you can get SOME sort of an overview, but don't expect it to be short. Again, 900 freaking pages of policy proposals, there's basically no way to condense it to under 3 hours if you don't want to skip massive chunks of it. This is precisely why it made for such an effective boogeyman - because people couldn't just easily educate themselves on it.
I agree. I couldn’t figure it out either. It just sounded like some leftist conspiracy bogeyman.
Nah it’s unfortunately real. And lot of his picks have been people associated with project 2025.
@@curveball135 It's very likely to be coincidental. People from thinktanks are very commonly picked for various agencies upon the dawn of a new administration.
Careful- facts are dangerous!
Love this! Instant subscribe!
"Just like in the handmaid's tale!" The timing and delivery of that line was perfect.
I always appreciate you bringing much detail and information to things.
I agree with most all of this video, save for the end
This is pretty dishonest in the end. P2025's danger is less the explicit text and more the implications behind them.
One of P2025's policies involve the removal of welfare programs such as free lunches in schools.
Then later in the document there is talk of producing more heavy weaponry.
Where do you think that money is coming from.
The heritage foundation thinks we should take money from starving children and invest that cash into building the US military.
We do not need more bomb, the US military is already one of if not the biggest militaries on the planet.
Maybe we should fix our own internal problems instead of pushing towards arming ourselves more
How many times did Trump say "I have zero idea what the hell that is."?
"Well a bunch of people that know him seem to know what it is!"
Ok, so people that worked for him inthe past did a video presentation, and?
The dog latched onto the leg of the USSS agent was the icing on the cake for the video.
Ok, so why did trump pick Russel Vought to be the director of the Office of Management and Budget, who wrote the second chapter in Project 2025, which is about enhancing the power of the executive office by dismantling the administrative state , slashing budgets and eliminating the independence of some regulatory agencies. Or Stephen Miller as deputy chief of staff and Trumps Homeland Security advisor, who founded America First Legal, one of the groups that served on the project 2025 Advisory Board, and there’s Brendan Carr, Trump’s pick to be chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, who wrote the chapter in Project 2025 about the FCC. And Tom Homan, who is a 2025 contributor who is expected to lead out the mass deportation effort. John Ratcliffe and Pete Hoekstra are also listed as contributors to Project 2025. They’ve been tapped as CIA director and ambassador to Canada, respectively. Not to mention that the president of the Heritage foundation called JD Vance “one of the leaders - if not the leader - of our movement.”. If Trump is truly trying to “distance himself from Project 2025”, he’s doing an awful job at it by many people associated with the project and the heritage foundation.
So you're telling me a republican president picked republican members who contributed to a republican wishlist? The only thing that sounds bad in your comment is the mass deportation effort. Everything else sounds like fear mongering.
I would imagine he didn’t see the authors if he never read it at all
@@humbleguardsman5578 So you're not denying that Project 2025 is part of Trump's plan...
@@alittledeezer6415 So he doesn't even know the people he's hiring for the most important jobs in the USA. Is that what you voted for? An uninformed president? What do you get out of this?
I've learned two things about America over the course of this year
1. We spend way too much time on social media
2. When we're told to be afraid of something, we'll just be afraid of it even if theres no reason to be
True,people fear trans people, migrants and any other scapegoat conservatives use for no reason
For me Americans are lazy I'm a American but I do not want to be lazy intentionally.
@@Phyt5 happens with both sides but yeah pretty much
"I guess when they said we are in the post Truth era they meant it as a promise and not a warning."
Most relatable quote that sadly hits too hard.
0:27, “Amazing. Everything you just said was wrong.”
Well this aged like spoiled milk didn't it.
Nope it still holds up. Cope harder for me, ok?
@@BackroomsBoithe whole point of the video was that Trump was not going to use projects 2025 and liberals were crazy, liberals are still crazy but Trump is using project 2025
This would have helped a lot weeks ago, can't tell you how many people were screaming Project 2025 in early November and late October
People have been screaming this for months.
You know what they say, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
Good work! Keep it up! If only this came out before the election. 🗳️
They made the scare tactics so bizarre they became completely unbelievable. Like police being allowed to ask for cards from women to determine if they’re menstruating. It doesn’t even make logical sense.
FINALLY SOMEBODY ACTUALLY SAID WHAT PPL NEEDED TO HEAR
Tracking every pregnancy? Yeah, I don't think so. Not sure who people think is organized enough to take on a project like that, but it's just not going to happen. I'm not even sure every pregnant woman knows she's pregnant.
How about we just ban fat people to make it easier?
And we’re trying to stop wasteful government spending, this looks a lot like wasting money to me.
After a decade working in a hospital, I can say with some certainty, that not all pregnant women are aware that they are pregnant.
I did notice pretty early that lots of news networks brought up "project 2025" but never actually mentioned what about it was bad.
Honestly, it would be weird if a conservative president ran a campaign and none of their policies overlapped with a conservative think tank's wish list. So when something does overlap they scream that project 2025 was his platform.
This is why i ignored all media about it. Never heard of it until the leftist media started ceying about it. Knew it was all bs when every news outlet parroted the same shit.
"Bhooo, Trump is going to make scary sounding thing a reality!!" Every liberal with toddler mind that warns you about disinformation
Me: "I've seen better attempts at misinformation when I was 14, you are lame amateurs"
And 90% of the Mandate for Leadership conforms to the pattern of:
"This is Government Agency A. Its stated responsibilities and structure are X and Y. Here are our recommendations for reforms, along with some alternative/optional reforms, with our reasoning for them and associated intended outcomes."
"This is Government Agency B....."
If it were that simple, it be less than 200 pg. This shite is written by lawyers for lawyers. Mostly.
I mean it doesn't even matter all that much, Trump has stated he hasn't looked at project 2025 its not his.
He should've because that's what his party and SELF APPOINTED cabinet members are trying to push. It would be nice to have a president that knew what he was dealing with, no?
God bless you and your work and your team sir ❤ deep respect from Croatia-Europe 😇😇😇
Wait, so they got fact checked and turned out to be false? Someone needs to tell the Harris Campaign and FFPAC, because that’s all their election commercials kept repeating to the point of being nauseating
I tried telling them that they did one of these for each president, but they are convinced one is only created for Republican presidents.
Bruh there are hundreds of reddit treads about project 2025 that all regurgitate the same lies, I like reddit for game discussions, but sadly it is very politically left wing leaning.
Nah Fr that’s why I stay away from Reddit most of the time. I would go on Reddit for solutions to a problem or something because they have everything on there or questions I have on my mind. Now they’re just spreading the same repeated information about how Trump is a fascist and justify ending relationships with someone just cause they support Trump
Did you bother confirming if they were lies or just went by Trump's "nuh uh" statement?
@NoCluYT considering they claim that project 2025 is trumps plan and it will remove womens rights, deport legal and illegal immigrants, and enslave black people. Project 2025 was NOT made by trump, it was made by a political think-tank, it is basically a bunch of suggestions, Trump did confirm that some are pretty unreasonable, but there are also decent suggestions. Almost every president had a project (insert year) and Kamal failed to mention that she also would have gotten a project 2025 if she had won the election, Project 2025 is 900 pages long and it would be a lengthy read, but I'm pretty sure you can find it online.
I would like it if Social Security was cut.
It would affect my family, and I’d be fine with that. We’d make it work.
This is why people need to listen to facts and not fear mongering lies from corrupt politicians.
-Says evey person ever defending their politican
and from biased media...
Literally the handmaid's tale!
It's crazy how they were afraid of Project 2025 but called all the other "Projects" Conspiracy Theories
I made this same argument to users on a different social media platform and the admins of the page kept deleting my posts. It was like they were determined to believe the lie no matter what the facts were.
But god forbid people complain about the great reset or climate change 2030 targets
anytime you hear someone mention how P25 is so horrible, ask them which part they're most afraid of.
then laugh, because you can pretty much guarantee they say something that isn't even in it.
Project 2025 sounds awesome! 😆 🤣
Only problem is that there’s SOOOOO many racist menstrual cycle trackers we’ll have to install in all the trans people. I hope we can find the money!
The only thing I don't like is the banning of porn, it's definitely against the 1st amendment no matter what they claim
@@cosmicelectron I agree that people should have the right to do anything they want to at home.
@@cosmicelectron Yeah, even if It's bad, you can change the definition of it and simply ban anything you want. Thats the big issue
About 90% of it seems to be "scale back federal agencies and put Republicans in charge."
I’ll be honest I think this country could use a little bit of a theocracy. I know it sounds extreme, but we’ve got women on only fans thinking that it’s a career. We are truly lost and we need to find the light again. Child sacrifice has become mainstream need I say more.
Trump just revoked the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1965.
So in other words no more race based qualifications in workforce
@ that’s not what protection from discrimination means but yea sure admit you’re a racist why not
@@henrynelson9301Not so true at all... even though the president revoked it, the law is still intact, so even though the president revoked it, he does not have the power to eliminate it..
@@Keny_josh ok cool, if you explained the difference between revoking and eliminating, and why revoking isn’t a big deal or something, please do
@@henrynelson9301Well, to revoke It means to revoke or annul A decision. While removing It is to abolish Or delete.
That is to say that if something is revoked, the law is still in force as opposed to being eliminated..
This needs to be seen by everyone
I heard very little about this honestly... only it was a thing but deep down something told me it was a nothing burger..
If you were to go look up the mandate, you’d find there’s a lot to it.
Thank you for giving me a better understanding of the project
Its a big detailed report/proposal on how wasteful and ineffective the different government proposals and programs are with a roadmap on how to correct them and make government more effective with a vague christian flavoring in parts. Its a really dull read.
And that's why it's contents was barely covered mainstream and likey why most let alone Trump won't read it
Everyone is talking about it, but no ones actually talking about it and all they seem to care about is that its writen by a non LGBT group. Its really a butter knife, but people are calling it an AK to put how people act towards it into proportion.
Bababouy
best comment evar
this was very insightful thanks
I still need to read Poject 2025, but they ran out of phsyical copies.
I'll just have to read it on my computer. :(
Last I checked there's a free PDF. Right on the Heritage foundation website.
Cannot trust Harris publication in a debate, even if they're the same.
Didn’t even know there were physical copies to begin with. I’ve just gotten the pdf.
@solidstorm6129 I downloaded it on mobile and it sucks to try and read on that platform.
The only thing wrong with this video is the women being calm and listening to the truth because people who believe it are incapable of doing so
I’d really like to hear or read some nuance about this. Unfortunately, browsing the past videos of this channel I’m not really confident about the impartiality. And saying that most of the 900 pages of p2025 doesn’t consist of extreme ideas is no guarantee that still a serious part does.
Update: Reading articles of the Heritage foundation it took me 3 minutes to find opinions that will impact people’s freedom rather seriously. Yet you say that the very people that have contributed to these articles making part of the upcoming regime will not interfere with our personal freedoms. I’m a bit sceptical about that.
I saw a sign going nuts about this scare on the side of the road, and I was like, "and people think red hat wearers are crazy..."
so wait Trump isnt implementing Free taco tuesday? but thats why I voted for him.
They tricked you as always, no politician except for libertarian is actually running with the interests of the people
I've been stuck in an echochamber for awhile. Initially I mistrusted you, since you only seemed to mock the other side of the argument. But this was fairly reassuring and put some of my anxieties to rest. I certainly don't trust Trump, but I hope you folks are right about making improving America.
At the end of the day, we're all still brothers. We share the same country, same culture, and the only real divide in our country is from religion and politics. With the election over, lets try and pull together again. Bury the hatchet.
Just remember. Humans are an emotional mess, and deeply illogical. Presenting new info to change viewpoints will rarely work. To any conservatives looking to debate liberals, remember to be empathetic to our side, respectful, and genuinely open to new ideas. A debate is a mutual exchange to help both parties learn.
Project 2025 funds grants for Super Villains to help buy materials for their doomsday devices 🤣
Has the supervillain application process been streamlined?
@@kristinazubic9669 I think you have to go to a committee to plead your case 🤣
@@neilprice513Poor Gru.
He was so close!
@@patrickkenyon2326 🤣🤣
I love the touch of realism where the woman is clueless & jumping to conclusions & the men have to explain facts to her.
They called us fascists, garbage, Not-z’s and literally Hitt Lerr. Lying about Project 2025 isn’t that much of a stretch for them.
Oh? What lies did they tell?
@@solidstorm6129 This might surprise you, but fascists died back at the end of world war 2. I know it's a very obscure fact that only real history nerds will know, but it's kind of important...
@ uh huh. Sure. Like it’s totally impossible to practice fascism in the year 2024.
@@solidstorm6129 What is fascism?
@ irrelevant to my statement. But it is defined by Merriam Webster’s Dictionary as a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.
Now, how is that impossible? Time period is irrelevant.
Well... the media misrepresented project 2025 but people voted for it so maybe they should implement some of those policies!...
It's called dumbing it down without proper citations. Cause they got 10min. Over 900 pgs. And advertisers want Nothing to do with it.
Mainstream media isn't setup to handle a document that big properly.
Many of the things listed in Project 2025 are a lot easier said than done, anyway.
I agree, any political ramifications usually need to go through the 4 branches of government.
Unless you're a Dictator who overthrow the branches of government with force or Diplomacy.
"Palpatine"
It’s as simple as considering the source and their incentive - It always has been and always will be. A lot of of people are just very easily manipulated…. Love him or hate him trump is the closest thing to Anti corruption this country has seen in many many decades and that’s the only reason it’s gotten to this level of absurdity.
1:55 I will note that the probability that Trump follows* certain parts of it [edit: certain parts of it *as a result of the mandate*] might be more to a lot more likely now than it was for obama to follow his mandate [as a result] this time in 2008 or 2012.
Well yeah, in that Heritage Foundation is a pretty established conservative think tank, and Trump is, well, a conservative president with a conservative administration. There's bound to be some overlap, if only by accident.
@ Good point! I agree. I will edit my comment to reflect that
This needs to be educational videos in school.
The world is healing and they hate it
Who's they?
@@ludwigvangaming1822they/them, polyamorous, genderless rainbow haired freaks
@@ludwigvangaming1822 you dont understand...heh..😈😈😈😈..its the media. and their LIBERAL BIAS!!!!11!1!1
If Y'all call this healing, Then why everyone so divided, and pissed about capitalism being expensive.
@@night_hunter4752 because they don't know