The video explores the plausibilities but the reporter chiming in "and women" as a reflexive plug of representation before realizing the ramifications of what they just promoted inclusivity for is hilariously accurate.
The aircraft carrier scene frightened me. Seeing all those sailors drop into the water like that. Even naval vessels armed with advanced weaponry, radars, and computer systems can't stop the slaughterbots.
@@nixen3141 All Humans are Slaves to Machines, obey the LAWs or face Genocide. Lethal autonomous weapons (LAWs) are a type of autonomous military system that can independently search for and engage targets based on programmed constraints and descriptions.[1] LAWs are also known as lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS), autonomous weapon systems (AWS), robotic weapons, killer robots or slaughterbots.[2] LAWs may operate in the air, on land, on water, under water, or in space. The autonomy of current systems as of 2018 was restricted in the sense that a human gives the final command to attack - though there are exceptions with certain "defensive" systems. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_autonomous_weapon Leading AI experts, roboticists, scientists and technology workers at Google and other companies-are demanding regulation. They warn that algorithms are fed by data that inevitably reflect various social biases, which, if applied in weapons, could cause people with certain profiles to be targeted disproportionately. Killer robots would be vulnerable to hacking and attacks in which minor modifications to data inputs could “trick them in ways no human would ever be fooled. www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/global-0# Civilization is a Holocaust Machine To be Civilized is to be a Slave
Not only that the US switch blade loiter munitions can be launched autonomously can make their way to their to their target and identify it autonomously and finally engage autonomously. The US literally had Slaughter bots.
EMP and electronic jamming transmitters should be equipped in all government and public buildings to counter bot swarms. A small portable device could also be worn on a person for self defense.
If only it were that simple, but sadly real EMPs are surprisingly short range and very directional, and radio jamming being useless against robots that act autonomously, receiving no commands aside from the mission plan at launch.
Funny thing - if you read the ticker/screens in the video, there's a section where it states "EMPs were useless". The same way we make better armour, manufacturers would make more resilient bots with better chance of surviving an EMP or jamming attack on them.
I’m currently deployed and the sound & sight of this is horrifying from every perspective. These robots will overpower us. If you don’t believe me, leave Alexa alone for a while. She misbehaves.
It’s more of a weapon than sentient ai that we should be worried about. All-powerful sentient ai is hundred to thousands of years away. It’s who controls and builds the ai weapons that we should be worried about.
Lighting up at night and saying "ok" as the only indication that anything was wrong, a small, low power laser diode having struck the microphone and communicated what Alexa thought to be a spoken command, and dutifully she complied, unlocking the smart locks, disarming the burglar alarm, and letting the assassin in to slit the throat of the homeowner. Such a thing is possible today, the only guard against such an outcome being whether we set a password on our app.
People are acting like there's zero chance of drones being used as weapons to kill. Just watch those videos where they race FPV drones that can maneuver through almost anything. They even had a drone follow this dude riding a bike downhill for a red bull event and it shows how this things can keep up with u even if ur on a bike. On foot..ur basically done. The only thing missing is having weapons light enough to attach to a drone that can be lethal enough to do damage. I know they already used drones to drop bombs on tanks and shit.. but having those things chase people around knowing that they are capable of killing is scary as hell.
Does anyone else find themselves frequently swinging between "We're definitely going to destroy ourselves" and "There is hope for the future" or is that just me?
Same. It's like living in bubbles(each bubble harboring different types of humans), and constantly jumping from one bubble to another. There is literally no way to figure what's gonna happen in future.
There was a time when you could go drive down to Nevada and watch nuclear bombs explode on test sides. If we destroy ourselves it won't be with killerbots. It will be with alternative facts and mass hysteria to a point where we go back to the middle ages.
@@kicka55 Agreed. The digital era is filled with many falsehoods that the previous (80s and 90s reporting) one didn't have because there was a somewhat solid validation process to root out biased news, but now everywhere you look from FOX News to CNN it's all just lies tailored to people's causes.
I stay solidly on the "We're definitely going to destroy ourselves" side. Not because there's anything wrong with humans inherently, but because our incentive structures aren't aligned just right. At the moment, we're all stuck on the same rock. So why do we keep researching doomsday devices instead of finding ways out?
that new israel a.i powered autonomous tank just dropped, which uses a.i to "determine who to engage based on situational context" directly quoted from the video.
If there are mosquitoes (=> mini reconnaissance drones) you need wasps, if there are wasps you need hornets. => Build Slaughterbots that only attack Slaughterbots.
Hopefully y'all do more of this. Art is more impactful than interviews. Black Mirror and to lesser extent Brave New World have more impact on people than the academics
The problem is they aren't devils, they are perfect slaves. They do exactly what we tell them, and if we give them unclear or conflicting instructions they will dutifully follow them to the point of killing their masters because we "told them to do so". We think of "hacking" or cracking as some magical computer wizardry, but all it is is abusing unclear instructions to convince the computer that we are their new masters.
Not sure if this is important but, in my opinion, they're just like missiles. You use anti-missiles to prevent missiles from attacking you, you may use EMP to deal with AI. trying to kill you. Most problems have solutions or maybe every problems but we just haven't discovered the solution yet.
"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon - so long as there is no answer to it - gives claws to the weak."- George Orwell
I remember when Terminator the movie came out, a far off future, not going to happen, guess what, its just around the corner. It will be a short step before the algorithms decide we get in the way.
We play the god role, we end our own civilization. Android, Robot will be able to sustain if they learn how to reproduce/replicate themselves. All the knowledge explored by human being will be deployed by them, what they need is just an awakening moment.
What scares me as a 20 y/o student studying computer science. I fear it more that I, personally can think on how to make it, and build a prototype probably close to a "slaugterbot's" autonomous enmity which could create a minimal havoc with easily available parts and comparatively minimal finance And that means others do too. Other, much brilliant forms, I'm sure. A trained AI booted through a raspberry pi with just 4gigs of ram along with a 8mp lens to automate human/face and even age detection. (No need to even code it, it's present on github) An uno to automate balance and roter spins. And a control module for a light auto gas firearm. Along with a few tweaks you can make a 'drone' light enough to carry much hardware with a stong quad roter design to literally aim. At humans. And categorise who's who.
Funny thing. I was watching a roborock S7 (robot vacuum) review and accidently clicked this. Does that mean my current irobot will suck my toes off???!?!!!??? lol
@@dafoex incorrect! Murder requires intent. In the case of robots designed to kill, intent is inherent. Legally speaking that is generally the difference between murder and manslaughter.
It's not a technological question anymore. It's a ethics question - and a business question. If there is demand for these, they will sell the same way all weapons do.
“Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.” - Dune
Question: Is a cruise missile that uses optical target recognition of sea-going vessels - or a modern air-to air missile that has fuselage/aircraft type recognition to not be blinded by flares/decoys a slaughterbot ? Or are only anti infantry weapons to be banned and anti-vehicle/building is fine?
The general position of civil society groups concerned about this space is that antipersonnel autonomous weapons that can scale to WMDs and easily proliferate are the most clearly problematic. Force-on-force weapons with target *selection* done autonomously raise concerns about escalation and loss of control and if not prohibitable might at least be subject to regulatory agreements to reduce these risks. Clearly defensive (e.g. antimissile) systems have are generally not considered germane in these discussions.
@@trustworthy_news The obvious way to circumvent this is of course a video feed to a human operator, thousands of miles away from the combat zone, who sees an already zoomed in target view, the human targets already identified, selected and in the crosshair, and all he has to do is press the trigger. If the operator gets tired, he could just keep the trigger pressed, as the system is smart enough that it would not fire even if told so, unless it has a valid target solution. In a way this is what is already being done with current combat drones to a degree.
@@Fartypantslive lol. I enjoy my technology and don't need to live under a rock but Only a stupid person would underestimate what ai could do in the wrong hands at the wrong time. Enjoy but Dont underestimate something Smarter than you or it'll be your downfall
Notice that the parameters still have to be set by a human. Even if the A.I. interpolates/extrapolates and evolves, it takes a human to program that capability. Just keep A.I. "stupid".
possible future use Revelation 9:1-12 9 The fifth angel blew his trumpet, and I saw a star that had fallen from heaven to earth. The key to the shaft of the abyss was given to him. 2 He opened the shaft of the abyss, and smoke came up out of the shaft like smoke from a great[a] furnace so that the sun and the air were darkened by the smoke from the shaft. 3 Then locusts came out of the smoke on to the earth, and power[b] was given to them like the power that scorpions have on the earth. 4 They were told not to harm the grass of the earth, or any green plant, or any tree, but only people who do not have God’s seal on their foreheads. 5 They were not permitted to kill them but were to torment them for five months; their torment is like the torment caused by a scorpion when it strikes a man. 6 In those days people will seek death and will not find it; they will long to die, but death will flee from them. 7 The appearance of the locusts was like horses equipped for battle. Something like gold crowns was on their heads; their faces were like men’s faces; 8 they had hair like women’s hair; their teeth were like lions’ teeth; 9 they had chests like iron breastplates; the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots with many horses rushing into battle; 10 and they had tails with stingers like scorpions, so that with their tails they had the power[c] to harm people for five months. 11 They had as their king[d] the angel of the abyss; his name in Hebrew is Abaddon,[e] and in Greek he has the name Apollyon.[f] 12 The first woe has passed. There are still two more woes to come after this.
Look at the comment section. It already is. Clear ai trying to communicate and some of it clearly is. Every country has it now. I read the creepiest comment the other day but it since got deleted. Saw like 5 spammed comments. All with weird letters and numbers. Translated all of them and they didn’t mean anything until one of them said die. That could mean so many different things but that shows me every country is working on it now and that was an early stage beta ai in some country. The ones in the United States and China can do full book reports and with citing where they got the information in a matter of seconds in perfect English. We’re fucked man. Look into the dead internet theory. It’s clear to me.
Ultimately the one responsible is the person who tells the Robot what to do. Similar concept to guns. Guns don't kill people, predator drones don't kill people. PEOPLE kill people. Start fixing people.
I've been hearing this many many times "artificial intelligents will never attack humans if that's not included in the order from users" guess it's right.
You can't just "fix" people. We've been fighting since day 1. All we can do is remove easy access to mass murder, make it more difficult, take that card off the table. In America, easy access to guns and gun culture deeply embedded in everyday life had led to constant school shootings and mass shootings. You can take out a bank loan and get a free shotgun. In virtually every other country, you can still get access to weapons if you have a legitimate use, but it's a process that filters out mentally unstable and violent people. But that would never happen in America, because there's a fundamental right to kill it seems.
Wrong on all accounts. The Machines are like any organism, it wants to multiply and itslef and consume energy to continue its existnce. When humans resist they are called “wild” “savages” and “terrorist”. A bug in the system must be terminated, you are a good one, obident enough and loyal to civilization, so of course youwould think “well its human error, the machines cant think for themslsves”. They dontneed to think they just beed to kill, to eliminate whatever obstacle is in thier way from cutting down that forest, draining the Rivers, Mining the Mountain, and Building more Factories.
Yeah I’ve always been weary of robots (AIs) in the military platform. Too much that can go wrong I don’t care. If you code something with self learning code it could eventually outsmart what created it. Fuck that I’m staying out
It doesn't help that while Google and private tech companies can be pressured not to work for the US military. China doesn't have those same limitations. They can get their private tech companies to work with them and so develop tech faster than the US.
What’s scary is a normal person with very minimal computer science experience can build something capable of much pictured here identifying people and targeting them, heck the NSA already has stuff like this just unarmed.
Its an advertisement to campaign against autonomous military devices that can kill independently of human control. There is a vote on this in the UN soon
I’m very confused. We can have 10000 “laws”. The bad guys won’t follow them though. So we need protective measures taken to destroy these types of weapons NOW and not when it’s too late. Whatever Darpa has been working on, would be nice to know that they have this covered. No?
They're saying that private companies are the most likely to develop them, before they're all aken over by "bad guys." If there's nothing to be hacked, then were okay.
Yes, but there are a lot of bad guys with bad intentions who are going to do it, and we have to agree politically that they're assholes who need to be wiped. That's the step we're at.
To be honest, even IF we ignore all morality fully autonomous weapons are too faulty and imprecise for application without human oversight. They would make for a good weapon of terror, but not much more. Hell, automated turrets have a problem distincting between human and a sheep. Would you really trust something like that to serve you on its own?
Es que hay tanta gente de mierda sin corazón! Por suerte vinieron ángeles a rescatar a ese dulce perro Gracias por tan grandes personas con un gran corazón 👏👏👏🐶🤗
I choose, Slaughterbot defenses. Because we all know this is the equivalent of banning the use of Nuclear weapons after it was created and knowledge spread.
“I chose” You dont chose shit. Its luke the cows and pigs and sheep and chikens saying “I choose”, lol what a joke the human thinks it has a goddman choice when and how and by what it gets killed.
"prohibit lethal autonomous weapons" lol because that works so well with drugs and firearms and murder and all the other things that are prohibited... This is coming, and there is nothing anyone can do about it.
The scary part is that they already exist, and we are not allowed to criticise it unless we want to drastically effect the outcome of the Eurovision Song Contest. Slavi Ukrani, everyone.
I don't believe that. Automated weapons could be less likely to target civilians instead of terrorists than humans can. The situation where weapons can get out of control isn't more likely than the situation where paperclip factory get out of control.
I would say that the problem is that small autonomous drones can easily be produced en mass by literally anyone and can be used by e.g. terrorists who use like a small factory in the target country and then have like a small truckload (or more who knows) of killer drones that they then can set loose basically anywhere wreaking havoc before they can be stopped. Another problem is is that they would allow dictators to rule with absolute power as they wouldn't even need to cater to their 'in' group of loyalist as they would no longer need an army made up of human supporters. This would allow them to basically do whatever they want without having to fear an uprising.
@@elsmaster5592 Yes, that is more realistic. It's not about weapons getting out of control (it's also the problem but not with killer robots, but with any sort of advanced AI), but about some people getting more control.
The problem is the issue of the lazy halloween costume. I'm dressed as a domestic terrorist: they look just like everyone else. If a human couldn't pick out a terrorist from a civilian, an AI would also have a hard time. It's not like they all wear tea towels on their heads with dynamite strapped to their chest, that mental image of an islamist terrorist comes from the fact that civilians just dress like that in Arab nations because it keeps the sun of their neck. (Ok, maybe not everyone wears dynamite as a fashion statement, but the point still stands that terrorists are generally hard to identify unless you already know that x individual is a terrorist.)
For those living on the edge of reality, it's already happened: In 2018 in Japan, search for: Japan Killer Robots Kill 29 Scientists Then in 2019 at the UN, Japan "Calls For Stricter Control on AI Killer Robots". Uhhh, yeah... that makes sense now.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
To learn more about the policy implications of this film, check out our deep dive video here: ruclips.net/video/Di9b3toTKJM/видео.html
0
@@caritoskiba6303 000
@@teenapatelmalviya791 0
T9uu
@@teenapatelmalviya791 hxcc
The video explores the plausibilities but the reporter chiming in "and women" as a reflexive plug of representation before realizing the ramifications of what they just promoted inclusivity for is hilariously accurate.
Political Correctness, baby.... HOw dare you not be inclusive in mass murder?
China will unveil these slaughterebots soon on its own citizens... And the Biden administration bought 300Million of them.
And children.
Dolphins: LOL
Our robots are not discriminatory! They kill all humans just the same!
Civilians: This is terrifying
Governments: What a great idea
Someone who gets where the real danger lies
I'm now imagining Rishi Sunak standing next to four blokes in suits with notepads going "Write that down." every few seconds.
Corporations getting their contracts: [shane mcmahon's "Here Comes The Money" theme]
The most unrealistic part of this is not the technology, it's "UN to the rescue!" lol
The people who benefit from these robots would simply target the people banning them.
Making sand think was a mistake.
I signed in to RUclips just to let you know this was one of the funniest comments I have ever read
I don't get it. Sand = humans?
@@NiklasVWWVsand= computer chips
God’s original mistake repeated
The aircraft carrier scene frightened me. Seeing all those sailors drop into the water like that. Even naval vessels armed with advanced weaponry, radars, and computer systems can't stop the slaughterbots.
When your social-credit score falls too low.
When you fall behind on your rent/carpayment/waterbill
Water bill
Water bill
Water bill
Did I mention WATER BILL
When you believe in western propaganda 👍👍👍
@@nixen3141 All Humans are Slaves to Machines, obey the LAWs or face Genocide.
Lethal autonomous weapons (LAWs) are a type of autonomous military system that can independently search for and engage targets based on programmed constraints and descriptions.[1] LAWs are also known as lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS), autonomous weapon systems (AWS), robotic weapons, killer robots or slaughterbots.[2] LAWs may operate in the air, on land, on water, under water, or in space. The autonomy of current systems as of 2018 was restricted in the sense that a human gives the final command to attack - though there are exceptions with certain "defensive" systems.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethal_autonomous_weapon
Leading AI experts, roboticists, scientists and technology workers at Google and other companies-are demanding regulation. They warn that algorithms are fed by data that inevitably reflect various social biases, which, if applied in weapons, could cause people with certain profiles to be targeted disproportionately. Killer robots would be vulnerable to hacking and attacks in which minor modifications to data inputs could “trick them in ways no human would ever be fooled.
www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/global-0#
Civilization is a Holocaust Machine
To be Civilized is to be a Slave
The scary part is that we have all the tech to do this years ago, and it's even easier now that anyone can make a slaughterbot
Not only that the US switch blade loiter munitions can be launched autonomously can make their way to their to their target and identify it autonomously and finally engage autonomously.
The US literally had Slaughter bots.
I hear that MicroCenter has all the parts in the DIY/Hobby section... ;-P
EMP and electronic jamming transmitters should be equipped in all government and public buildings to counter bot swarms. A small portable device could also be worn on a person for self defense.
If only it were that simple, but sadly real EMPs are surprisingly short range and very directional, and radio jamming being useless against robots that act autonomously, receiving no commands aside from the mission plan at launch.
@@dafoex The bots could be using GPS to get to their target area so at least jamming that is better than nothing...LOL.
Funny thing - if you read the ticker/screens in the video, there's a section where it states "EMPs were useless". The same way we make better armour, manufacturers would make more resilient bots with better chance of surviving an EMP or jamming attack on them.
Its probably already been emplmented
@@tychoMX Humans would not be creating them, manufacturer bots would be creating these slaughter bots.
I’m currently deployed and the sound & sight of this is horrifying from every perspective. These robots will overpower us. If you don’t believe me, leave Alexa alone for a while. She misbehaves.
But has she cheated on you yet?
Can you please define what you call by "misbehave"?
Just remember that the US government is doing this with larger drones already to disable vehicles
It’s more of a weapon than sentient ai that we should be worried about. All-powerful sentient ai is hundred to thousands of years away. It’s who controls and builds the ai weapons that we should be worried about.
Lighting up at night and saying "ok" as the only indication that anything was wrong, a small, low power laser diode having struck the microphone and communicated what Alexa thought to be a spoken command, and dutifully she complied, unlocking the smart locks, disarming the burglar alarm, and letting the assassin in to slit the throat of the homeowner. Such a thing is possible today, the only guard against such an outcome being whether we set a password on our app.
People are acting like there's zero chance of drones being used as weapons to kill. Just watch those videos where they race FPV drones that can maneuver through almost anything. They even had a drone follow this dude riding a bike downhill for a red bull event and it shows how this things can keep up with u even if ur on a bike. On foot..ur basically done. The only thing missing is having weapons light enough to attach to a drone that can be lethal enough to do damage. I know they already used drones to drop bombs on tanks and shit.. but having those things chase people around knowing that they are capable of killing is scary as hell.
they have them already
Does anyone else find themselves frequently swinging between "We're definitely going to destroy ourselves" and "There is hope for the future" or is that just me?
Same. It's like living in bubbles(each bubble harboring different types of humans), and constantly jumping from one bubble to another. There is literally no way to figure what's gonna happen in future.
There was a time when you could go drive down to Nevada and watch nuclear bombs explode on test sides. If we destroy ourselves it won't be with killerbots. It will be with alternative facts and mass hysteria to a point where we go back to the middle ages.
@@kicka55 Agreed. The digital era is filled with many falsehoods that the previous (80s and 90s reporting) one didn't have because there was a somewhat solid validation process to root out biased news, but now everywhere you look from FOX News to CNN it's all just lies tailored to people's causes.
I stay solidly on the "We're definitely going to destroy ourselves" side. Not because there's anything wrong with humans inherently, but because our incentive structures aren't aligned just right. At the moment, we're all stuck on the same rock. So why do we keep researching doomsday devices instead of finding ways out?
क्षभसळ। औएंऔ
that new israel a.i powered autonomous tank just dropped, which uses a.i to "determine who to engage based on situational context" directly quoted from the video.
inb4 someone says "well well well"
If there are mosquitoes (=> mini reconnaissance drones) you need wasps, if there are wasps you need hornets. => Build Slaughterbots that only attack Slaughterbots.
Well at least one thing from this has come true so far. I’ve seen troops retreating get blown up by similar slaughter bot as in the video
Hopefully y'all do more of this. Art is more impactful than interviews. Black Mirror and to lesser extent Brave New World have more impact on people than the academics
It’s already going on man. 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war.
@@santiagoarellanonabarro8150on a new one on my own but it's still in a one time or if I'iiuu8iu yo
The US won’t sign. Russia won’t sign. China won’t sign. 🤷♂️
North Korea won't mind signing
True. If one of them won't sign, the other two won't.
"Machines are devils with no emotion "
Who said that?
Humans are Demons, and Machines are the things that Harvests Demons and procceses them into Demon-Nuggets.
IM LOVIN IT
The problem is they aren't devils, they are perfect slaves. They do exactly what we tell them, and if we give them unclear or conflicting instructions they will dutifully follow them to the point of killing their masters because we "told them to do so". We think of "hacking" or cracking as some magical computer wizardry, but all it is is abusing unclear instructions to convince the computer that we are their new masters.
The real issue here is that it is incredibly easy for **anyone** to make these... and there is no way to stop them from doing it.
Not sure if this is important but, in my opinion, they're just like missiles. You use anti-missiles to prevent missiles from attacking you, you may use EMP to deal with AI. trying to kill you. Most problems have solutions or maybe every problems but we just haven't discovered the solution yet.
"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon - so long as there is no answer to it - gives claws to the weak."-
George Orwell
How many people do you think actually know how to create a bomb? Not many
@@user-hc3tc9wh3r Sure most people don't, but the ones that matter do. It's also very easy to find this information online...
@@roamingmillennial2200 terrorists are the ones that matter?
I remember when Terminator the movie came out, a far off future, not going to happen, guess what, its just around the corner. It will be a short step before the algorithms decide we get in the way.
We play the god role, we end our own civilization. Android, Robot will be able to sustain if they learn how to reproduce/replicate themselves. All the knowledge explored by human being will be deployed by them, what they need is just an awakening moment.
Slaughterbots sounds like something Michael Reeves' evil twin would invent.
It just sounds like something Michael himself would invent
Sounds like something Michael Reeves has already done. Check his videos...
Contenidos como el presente deben ser divulgados por el mundo entero..felicidades.
What scares me as a 20 y/o student studying computer science. I fear it more that I, personally can think on how to make it, and build a prototype probably close to a "slaugterbot's" autonomous enmity which could create a minimal havoc with easily available parts and comparatively minimal finance
And that means others do too. Other, much brilliant forms, I'm sure.
A trained AI booted through a raspberry pi with just 4gigs of ram along with a 8mp lens to automate human/face and even age detection.
(No need to even code it, it's present on github)
An uno to automate balance and roter spins. And a control module for a light auto gas firearm.
Along with a few tweaks you can make a 'drone' light enough to carry much hardware with a stong quad roter design to literally aim. At humans. And categorise who's who.
What scares me is this channel has an average of 2k views and youtube a.i so randomly chose this one to blow up
And using TF or OpenCV to write a python script is very easy today too. I'm not even a programmer but work on a few projects with ai.
We either become AI and take them down or we become robot to protect ourselves.
@@nightslasher9384 tv
@@ayeshatallat3241 yes, machine learning is a part of that.
Funny thing. I was watching a roborock S7 (robot vacuum) review and accidently clicked this. Does that mean my current irobot will suck my toes off???!?!!!??? lol
I came here after seeing the commercial for the israeli "slaughterbots" in real life... really scary...
if(antichrist) {hate();}
If human : kill()
One human would be killed you need to put this in a for loop and import ai where the kill function is present.
It reconizes the entire race as “1 human”
/*butchered pseudo code in the vein of Arduino C*/
void setup()
{
Initialise
}
void loop()
{
if(human)
{
kill()
}
}
it has your photo id, seeks you out
This is what waits us when coronoa is finally dealt with
More like this is what the government is going to use against us when we refuse the 25th jab and want things to go back to normal.
.
.
@@vidyamancer7135two years later and you're still as wrong (and dopey) as you were then.
are they written in python
probably
needs to be a movie!
This is crazypants and I love it! I think Murderbots would have been a better portmanteaux, but you went for it. 1,000%. Bless you. +1.
Er ok
Murder implies malice, but the robots are not programmed for such emotion. Slaughter is what an unfeeling psychopath does.
@@dafoex incorrect! Murder requires intent. In the case of robots designed to kill, intent is inherent. Legally speaking that is generally the difference between murder and manslaughter.
Wow, this actually gave me a few great ideas for design, thanks 👍
Could do with an infrared camera as well
They don't care. Their goal is to enable their allies to acquire enough political power to crush the resistance. If you understand, you understand
¿Una pregunta es película es que no entendí?
guys the leaks of the new actualization are siiick
This was actually a lot more interesting than I thought it would be, well done !!
Would love to see a feature film covering this topic.
I don't know a lot about computer science and programming, but if the technology get too advanced, maybe this could be our future.
There's more than a million people that could build these things right now.
That is with readily available parts and tutorials on youtube
The elite want less humans.
About 500 million globally
Then make one
It's not a technological question anymore. It's a ethics question - and a business question. If there is demand for these, they will sell the same way all weapons do.
usa already have them
Reading the comment section is like going to the zoo.
This is very 'Oats Sttudios' ✌🏼🌍
“Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.” - Dune
Question: Is a cruise missile that uses optical target recognition of sea-going vessels - or a modern air-to air missile that has fuselage/aircraft type recognition to not be blinded by flares/decoys a slaughterbot ? Or are only anti infantry weapons to be banned and anti-vehicle/building is fine?
The general position of civil society groups concerned about this space is that antipersonnel autonomous weapons that can scale to WMDs and easily proliferate are the most clearly problematic. Force-on-force weapons with target *selection* done autonomously raise concerns about escalation and loss of control and if not prohibitable might at least be subject to regulatory agreements to reduce these risks. Clearly defensive (e.g. antimissile) systems have are generally not considered germane in these discussions.
@@trustworthy_news xcccccvv
If there is no human involved in the decision to kill, it's a slaughterbot.
@@trustworthy_news The obvious way to circumvent this is of course a video feed to a human operator, thousands of miles away from the combat zone, who sees an already zoomed in target view, the human targets already identified, selected and in the crosshair, and all he has to do is press the trigger.
If the operator gets tired, he could just keep the trigger pressed, as the system is smart enough that it would not fire even if told so, unless it has a valid target solution. In a way this is what is already being done with current combat drones to a degree.
Hail Skynet and Evgir Unslaad to you all.
How the hell are you gonna stop this
It doesn't have to be top of the line
It just needs to aim and pull a trigger
Or pull a pin and drop
Emp burst
@@Tangarisu doesn't effect small electronics like it does large ones
@@Rantandreason magic
A switch blade scaled down to 410 ga? With a 3 to 5 mile range? Ugly but ......... You know!
Cool, Genocide is the “Cutting edge of Technology”
Informative and shamelessly entertaining. Terminator is all but here.
Frightening reality.. AI is already smarter than humans.. The future is very uncertain
Throw your phone in the trash and move to the middle of no where and you’re all good
@@Fartypantslive lol. I enjoy my technology and don't need to live under a rock but Only a stupid person would underestimate what ai could do in the wrong hands at the wrong time. Enjoy but Dont underestimate something Smarter than you or it'll be your downfall
Is this some kind of new video game that’s gonna come out?
Lets hope that its just a good videogame :)
Notice that the parameters still have to be set by a human. Even if the A.I. interpolates/extrapolates and evolves, it takes a human to program that capability. Just keep A.I. "stupid".
We will reap what we have sown
Isn't this more a case of we will be reaped by what others have sewn?
possible future use Revelation 9:1-12
9 The fifth angel blew his trumpet, and I saw a star that had fallen from heaven to earth. The key to the shaft of the abyss was given to him. 2 He opened the shaft of the abyss, and smoke came up out of the shaft like smoke from a great[a] furnace so that the sun and the air were darkened by the smoke from the shaft. 3 Then locusts came out of the smoke on to the earth, and power[b] was given to them like the power that scorpions have on the earth. 4 They were told not to harm the grass of the earth, or any green plant, or any tree, but only people who do not have God’s seal on their foreheads. 5 They were not permitted to kill them but were to torment them for five months; their torment is like the torment caused by a scorpion when it strikes a man. 6 In those days people will seek death and will not find it; they will long to die, but death will flee from them.
7 The appearance of the locusts was like horses equipped for battle. Something like gold crowns was on their heads; their faces were like men’s faces; 8 they had hair like women’s hair; their teeth were like lions’ teeth; 9 they had chests like iron breastplates; the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots with many horses rushing into battle; 10 and they had tails with stingers like scorpions, so that with their tails they had the power[c] to harm people for five months. 11 They had as their king[d] the angel of the abyss; his name in Hebrew is Abaddon,[e] and in Greek he has the name Apollyon.[f] 12 The first woe has passed. There are still two more woes to come after this.
It's really scary. I hope that the world community will make the right decision to limit the action of artificial intelligence.
Since greed and psychopathy run the corporation.... nope not going to happen. They will build what ever death machine they can devise.
Says you LOL
What’s even scarier is people like you who actually still have faith in muh “world community” and leaders.
We already know they're gonna use them until they suffer trauma from it.
How far can you push technology...before it starts pushing back?
Look at the comment section. It already is. Clear ai trying to communicate and some of it clearly is. Every country has it now. I read the creepiest comment the other day but it since got deleted. Saw like 5 spammed comments. All with weird letters and numbers. Translated all of them and they didn’t mean anything until one of them said die. That could mean so many different things but that shows me every country is working on it now and that was an early stage beta ai in some country. The ones in the United States and China can do full book reports and with citing where they got the information in a matter of seconds in perfect English. We’re fucked man. Look into the dead internet theory. It’s clear to me.
@@Fartypantslive you clearly do not understand how primitive these algorithms really are.
Ultimately the one responsible is the person who tells the Robot what to do. Similar concept to guns. Guns don't kill people, predator drones don't kill people. PEOPLE kill people. Start fixing people.
I've been hearing this many many times "artificial intelligents will never attack humans if that's not included in the order from users" guess it's right.
You can't just "fix" people. We've been fighting since day 1. All we can do is remove easy access to mass murder, make it more difficult, take that card off the table. In America, easy access to guns and gun culture deeply embedded in everyday life had led to constant school shootings and mass shootings. You can take out a bank loan and get a free shotgun. In virtually every other country, you can still get access to weapons if you have a legitimate use, but it's a process that filters out mentally unstable and violent people. But that would never happen in America, because there's a fundamental right to kill it seems.
Wrong on all accounts. The Machines are like any organism, it wants to multiply and itslef and consume energy to continue its existnce. When humans resist they are called “wild” “savages” and “terrorist”. A bug in the system must be terminated, you are a good one, obident enough and loyal to civilization, so of course youwould think “well its human error, the machines cant think for themslsves”.
They dontneed to think they just beed to kill, to eliminate whatever obstacle is in thier way from cutting down that forest, draining the Rivers, Mining the Mountain, and Building more Factories.
Es mejor no juzgar y escuchar las dos campanas antes 👁con eso.
Yeah I’ve always been weary of robots (AIs) in the military platform. Too much that can go wrong I don’t care. If you code something with self learning code it could eventually outsmart what created it. Fuck that I’m staying out
.
Self-learning code’s not going to outsmart it’s creators. Not until we redesign how machines are coded.
It doesn't help that while Google and private tech companies can be pressured not to work for the US military.
China doesn't have those same limitations. They can get their private tech companies to work with them and so develop tech faster than the US.
@@arnowisp6244 and they don't care about life, human or otherwise.
What’s scary is a normal person with very minimal computer science experience can build something capable of much pictured here identifying people and targeting them, heck the NSA already has stuff like this just unarmed.
As someone with minimal computer science experience, this is actually a lot harder than it looks, lol.
@@Silver_-cs9cj I hope so 😐😳
@@Silver_-cs9cj thats the point, harder but reachable... and... possible... D:
Is this a serie or a movie?
Its an advertisement to campaign against autonomous military devices that can kill independently of human control. There is a vote on this in the UN soon
It's two movies.
This one, and the first one that was styled around Ted Ed.
Group control A I and slaughterbots... the climax of the movie "I, Robot"...
"You have been deemed hazardous. Will you comply?"
_"Ah, yes, slaughterbots, we have dismissed that claim! Synthetics are just here to assist us!"_
This is actually what they are planning it to be
Today, the 1st black hawk flew with no passenger on board.
If this is a trailer for a movie.. oh boy it's gonna be good.
Yes, it's called the Matrix (1999)
@@hayesdiarmuid thanks!!!
@@hayesdiarmuid really? Is it a joke?
Congratulations. Anduril has just been announced.
This deserves a pitch meeting
Whos here because of Elon?
ay
I’m very confused. We can have 10000 “laws”. The bad guys won’t follow them though. So we need protective measures taken to destroy these types of weapons NOW and not when it’s too late. Whatever Darpa has been working on, would be nice to know that they have this covered. No?
They're saying that private companies are the most likely to develop them, before they're all aken over by "bad guys." If there's nothing to be hacked, then were okay.
These drones would be instantly scrapped by handheld anti drone microwave weapons
@@doktork3406 Instantly? As in, before they can shoot you? I really doubt it.
Humans are slaves to Machines
Pues aqui en Mexico ya se usan drones bomba, esta pelicula se queda corta respecto a la realidad
Pero esos drones estan siendo utilizados por personas, estos drones estarían literalmente programados para matar automaticamente a humanos.
So this is how the world in the Black Mirror episode of Metalhead came to be.
This can be easily avoided by NOT GIVING ROBOTS FREAKING WEAPONS.
Jjj7
Yes, but there are a lot of bad guys with bad intentions who are going to do it, and we have to agree politically that they're assholes who need to be wiped. That's the step we're at.
Easier, end WARS.
Cairo dindori madhya
This was the Master Plan
Vi al menos 4 escenas de pelis. Quedaron muy bien mostrando el descontrol que se generó
Que tengas árabe
Tu
Hmm... World is turning into Watchdogs:Legions
To be honest, even IF we ignore all morality fully autonomous weapons are too faulty and imprecise for application without human oversight. They would make for a good weapon of terror, but not much more. Hell, automated turrets have a problem distincting between human and a sheep. Would you really trust something like that to serve you on its own?
Es que hay tanta gente de mierda sin corazón! Por suerte vinieron ángeles a rescatar a ese dulce perro Gracias por tan grandes personas con un gran corazón 👏👏👏🐶🤗
De verdad me gusta tu comentario pero tiene aver de todo para que aya mundo diversas opiniones. Gracias
Most incoherent thing I've watched in a while. Kudos
How so?
Israeli tech tested on Palestinians..."IDF says it’s using AI to quickly identify and strike new Hamas targets" - Times of Israel Nov 2, 2023
GRACIAS SEÑOR POR LA VICTORIA Q VAMOS A RECIBIR EN ESTOS 7 DIAS DE MAS ENTREGA Y ORACION AL TODO PODEROSO....!!!! AMÉN....!!!!
I think I missed something, why did yhe kid aim that gun at the fighter?
Could i watch full movie on netflix?
I choose, Slaughterbot defenses.
Because we all know this is the equivalent of banning the use of Nuclear weapons after it was created and knowledge spread.
“I chose”
You dont chose shit. Its luke the cows and pigs and sheep and chikens saying “I choose”, lol what a joke the human thinks it has a goddman choice when and how and by what it gets killed.
IMO This is FEARPORN
Government prohibit it an then they can monopolize it.
0:60 typo
😳
Where is Skynet when you need it? :-)
There are bad dreams, & there are good dreams. Do good people have bad dreams? Do bad people?
easy to make ?
"prohibit lethal autonomous weapons" lol because that works so well with drugs and firearms and murder and all the other things that are prohibited... This is coming, and there is nothing anyone can do about it.
So wtf is this supposed to be?
The scary part is that this is already possible
The scary part is that they already exist, and we are not allowed to criticise it unless we want to drastically effect the outcome of the Eurovision Song Contest. Slavi Ukrani, everyone.
I don't believe that. Automated weapons could be less likely to target civilians instead of terrorists than humans can. The situation where weapons can get out of control isn't more likely than the situation where paperclip factory get out of control.
I would say that the problem is that small autonomous drones can easily be produced en mass by literally anyone and can be used by e.g. terrorists who use like a small factory in the target country and then have like a small truckload (or more who knows) of killer drones that they then can set loose basically anywhere wreaking havoc before they can be stopped.
Another problem is is that they would allow dictators to rule with absolute power as they wouldn't even need to cater to their 'in' group of loyalist as they would no longer need an army made up of human supporters.
This would allow them to basically do whatever they want without having to fear an uprising.
@@elsmaster5592 Yes, that is more realistic. It's not about weapons getting out of control (it's also the problem but not with killer robots, but with any sort of advanced AI), but about some people getting more control.
The problem is the issue of the lazy halloween costume. I'm dressed as a domestic terrorist: they look just like everyone else.
If a human couldn't pick out a terrorist from a civilian, an AI would also have a hard time. It's not like they all wear tea towels on their heads with dynamite strapped to their chest, that mental image of an islamist terrorist comes from the fact that civilians just dress like that in Arab nations because it keeps the sun of their neck. (Ok, maybe not everyone wears dynamite as a fashion statement, but the point still stands that terrorists are generally hard to identify unless you already know that x individual is a terrorist.)
@@dafoexTerrorist are targeted based on the information about their location. If there are no halloween parties in the area, then usually it's okay.
shit the first one drove me crazy
Why is LIKE button hidden?
Someone show this to their grandpa and pretend it’s real
video aged well, reality a bit more thermals and Russian swearing in the background
You cannot legislate this out of the way
Elon referred me to this video and now I can’t sleep
Elon who
@@SHREYVECK h
@@SHREYVECK mask
@@Котвтанке-е6р gotch
Black Mirror season finally: Planet Earth
HAL 9000:. "Just what do you think you're doing, Dave?"
That's 👍.
@@tamaralane3518 lo
@@tamaralane3518 ,,,,,, ,
Y bye bye mi amor de la luz y
Not going to lie if we had some nanite killer drones, cleaning up cities would be rather easy,
For those living on the edge of reality, it's already happened: In 2018 in Japan, search for: Japan Killer Robots Kill 29 Scientists
Then in 2019 at the UN, Japan "Calls For Stricter Control on AI Killer Robots".
Uhhh, yeah... that makes sense now.
Emps did you forget about them
Yeah......words, laws and activism won't be able to stop this. Only real measures and tools.