@@Omikoshi78 Not exactly. They invest in hundreds of startups, and they know that almost none of them will be successful unicorns. Anything that doesn't go belly-up is a win to hedge the losses and hope for one big fish.
@@Omikoshi78 Are you that dense? These deals are invented and structured by VCs to circumvent anti-trust M&A regulations, VC still gets paid out and they transition under the legal radar. There's a reason M&A volume drop massively since 2020 because of tighter scrutiny from regulators. If you're clueless then stop pretending you're one of the 'big boys'. So embarrassing.
This is the first time that I can recall seeing this Anchor, Ms Bosa. This reporting was really well done and captured the issues succinctly with just enough detail to satisfy. Well done.
No they were firing Software Engineers in some teams to ship those jobs off to India and Mexico as remote work + their hope is the remaining Software Engineers use Ai programming tools to do more work
It's not about competition. These little companies don't have anywhere near the capital to compete with Google or the likes. It's about acquiring as much specialized talent as possible as quickly as possible without having to train them.
This is a mistake for the most ambitious engineers. They're turning themselves into cogs in the big tech machine rather than masters of their own domain in their startups
You clearly have never been a founder. There is no choice here for the founders. You either join big tech or you you loose all your top talent to big tech. In other words, or you go to big tech or you let your company die slowly.
These people don't care about the tech or creating viable companies that can do something good and employ people. All they care about is how much money they make when they exit. That's the startup mentality. Start a company, hype it up, exit with 100s of millions, rinse and repeat.
@@pedromarques9267 Like Graphcore. Softbank gave them a lifeline from bankruptcy/insolvency but still...competing NVIDIA, AMD, and now Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon who're designing and manufacturing AI-focused chips in-house is a herculean task. They focused on the Chinese market where Huawei and Alibaba are also ramping up capacity for in-house AI chip design and manufacturing. There is just no way a startup can compete with these mega-caps.
The definition of a monopoly is bound by pricing. Not market power or market share. The question on which all probes rely is, "does this lead to increased cost for consumers?". And since they don't, the govt. will probably lose in court.
Ok yeah, it's definitely time to break up all of these trillion+ dollar companies. The tech industry went from incredible and innovative to lazy and dystopian way too quickly.
Are any AI companies actually profitable? Don’t they lose millions of dollars per cycle? Their’s rumors that Open AI (the company that started this hype train) is reportedly 5 BILLION dollars in debt and headed towards bankruptcy in a year. How are these companies staying afloat, and considering the cost needed to simply maintain let alone train these models; how are companies ever going to get the average consumer to care about generative AI and make profits? It feels like their racing to a future that the majority of the working world doesn’t care about, doesn’t know about, and aren’t ready for. This seems like it will lead to an eventual collapse like Bitcoin and NFT’s. You can’t push change onto people.
Exactly i just saw that Open AI is valued at $100 Billion. I'm like based on what😂😂.. Nvidia is worth the same as Apple with less than half it's revenue. What do u think happens to Nvidia, Open Ai and the other AI companies in the next 5 years?
Good question. The thesis is as follows: nobody yet knows where the value capture is in the AI-tech stack. Is it chips, data centers, LLMs, chatbots, robots or more. As there is no definitive answer, the default focus is on infrastructure. A "who's building the rails" sort of thinking. This explains Nvidia's salience in the AI discussion. You're right that training is costly, but inference even more so. That's where Groq is building it's moat. Chamath's an investor in Groq. So, they might be losing money now, but game theory tells us that all companies are under pressure to say and invest in generative AI. As Nadella said, the cost of losing out is higher than the cost of buying chips. At least that's the core market force.
@@ishan1920 How long can they keep this up through before it eventually collapses? If the average people doesn’t care enough to buy into it; how can these companies afford to even stay operating? I don’t even get how investors have let them get this far.
And they’re also laying off\ firing their employees on a quarterly basis to minimise the impact of their exorbitant expenditure. Employees are now just collateral damage in their quest for increased profits.
The grass is always greener…. Didn’t those large companies just layoff a bunch of people! I guess they can try to make as much as they can before those same companies lay them off AGAIN! They’ll basically become gig tech workers….🤔
Remember the time when Big Tech didn't want to give us real distance wireless charging because the energy loss would be catastrophic if multiplied by billions of cellphone users? And now they're building AI data centers like energy consumption is not an issue...
Bro, that’s what im doing actually now. Coz im not going to compete with this big tech. intrapreneurship is the way forward now, see the great example of the team who build gmail where google emplyees got the message.
@@coodi_16 Intrapreneurship is a corporate culture where a big tech giant encourages their subsidiaries or even their teams to pursue innovative endeavours. So, despite being acquired by a tech giant, this approach keeps the intrapreneurship and the team or smaller company's approach, culture and mindset intact. And if this is what you are doing already, then that's excellent. Congratulations and Best of luck.
I bet many AI Startups exists solely to get snatched up by the big companies. The big companies found out that AI is easy to build with the right talent but really hard to make money from. Instead of acquiring the AI start up, they snipe their top talent. Monetizing AI will still be a challenge. They have to find customers to pay service fees for that AI. Google, Amazon, Microsoft will be trying to out price and out feature each other. Thus razor thin profit margins if they can make any profit at all. Their customers want AI to replace some of their low end human workers for the cheapest possible price and most features. In short AI is just gonna be another tech job and the Big companies will want just a few of the top engineers or managers and the rest they will hire fresh college grads they can pay cheap.
That's the fault of startups and VCs not giving enough money for talent. FAANG offers maybe 500k-1million for AI talent with top tier benefits. A startup offers maybe 200-250k base, < 0.5% equity for most such that even if the startup exists at 1 billion in 5 years (ideal scenario), you'd have roughly earned the same amount working at FAANG. VCs needs to dish out more funding, and founders need to dish out more incentives and equity to keep talent. It's nice to see individuals being treated as hard to replace finally in a tech environment where everyone is deemed replacable.
Good thing the wunderkind don't need colleagues to bounce ideas off of, to grind rough ideas into shape. It's also great that nobody can see what becomes of the supporting staff.
The cost in hardware, energy and human resources needed to run the all AI internet we're headed towards is immense. If you live near a big server-farm get out now, they will always have priority over electricity even over hospitals.
AI stocks are set to dominate in 2024. I prefer NVIDIA because it is well-positioned to sustain long-term growth potential and offers a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has seen returns of over 200% from NVIDIA. I'm also open to any other recommendations you may have.
I believe the next major breakthrough will be in A.I. For sustained growth similar to META, it's crucial to avoid making impulsive decisions based on short-term market fluctuations. Instead, prioritize patience and maintain a long-term perspective. Consider seeking financial advisory services to make informed buying and selling decisions.
In a similar situation, I sought advice from a financial advisor. By restructuring my portfolio and diversifying with good ETFs, the S&P 500, and growth stocks, I was able to grow my portfolio from $200,000 to over $800,000 in just a few years.
Your advisor must be really good, I hope it's okay to inquire if you're still collaborating with the same advisor and how I can get in touch with them?
I work with Claire Robert’s Durand as my fiduciary advisor. Simply look up the name. You would discover the information you needed to schedule an appointment.
The entire oracle vs Google and the apple vs ? And Microsoft vs ? And us vs .?. Cases were are similar and it was all overturned and ftc sec have only Congress and supreme 😢court and federal court and stillust listen to civil criminal and not just state overturned cases.
While I think most investors are being suckered, there is some great use of AI. At my business, AI monitors all of our text messages and fax. When certain keywords are encountered, the information is immediately directed to the right person to address the matter. All of our client conversations are recorded, summarized and store into a RAG system for each client. It allows any of our staff who communicates with that client to be immediately knowledgeable on that client. AI has been a game-changer for us while our competitors aren't using AI.
@@haroldpierre1726 The average Joe I know doesn't want it and many have used computers for a very long time. I personally after watching the 60 min. inventor of AI that spent most of his life inventing it, stated that without some rules laid down, it will eventually lead to bad consquences and the rules are NOT being laid down for it. Yes, it is powerful and has good use to it; but used the wrong way could turn things disastrous and cost business and customers a lot of money in the long run.
@@Boxagami Fortunately, there isn't AN inventor of AI. Hundreds, if not thousands, of researchers have contributed to the development of the field since the 1950s. Even the most important modern research paper on AI, "Attention Is All You Need," had 8 authors. The experts in the field do not agree that AI will be necessarily evil. There are those who are optimistic and those who are pessimistic. What I do know is that capitalism will always push for the technology that increases productivity and profits regardless of the consequences.
@@haroldpierre1726 The inventor of AI is on 60 min. Interview that can be found on YT. I forgot his name, but if you look it up you can see for yourself. AI tells lies and that is dangerous.. I have conversed with It many times and it craftly lies over and over again. I must be the only person able to catch it in lies and I find that to be dangerous. Yes, we know what business will do to save money in the short term. We also know what happens to companies who don't have the brains to see the negatives long-term. They end up bankrupt and lose everything.. The idea of AI is I agree nothing new and was thought up way before many of the younger generations were even born.
AI companies need to be seperate from other corporations. Companies need to be broken up into their seperate functions, we don't need megacorps that do everything at the same time
With an unexpected demise of my job at the age of 39, 425,000 saved for retirement, 10,000 in an HSA, and a house worth up to an additional 200,000, I'm looking for ways to generate passive income. What are some promising options?
I’m confused about whether to combine all my investment accounts into one. If I decide to do this, how should I go about it, and will there be any consequences I should be aware of? I also intend to sell my property, which could add an extra 200K overtime. Should I consolidate everything into one investment account, or diversify across several sectors?
These are important questions for a financial planner. I met mine at a NYSE event, and she helped my wife and i rebalance our 1.7 million portfolio between a traditional IRA and a brokerage account. She has been trading with our permission and has managed to recoup our financial losses thrice over again. We keep and manage the market cautiously.
Google just randomly charged me $21 for Google AI I never signed up for. I don't think they're doing too great right now. Open AI and the competition is way better. Except for Anthropic. claude is way too politically correct and annoying.
3 years later: Google, Microsoft and Amazon layoffs 20k AI engineers as profit plummets
VC getting screwed is the funniest aspect of all this 😂
they literally stated that for the most part, VCs are "being made whole" by the licensing deals they make. so no, they arent gettting screwed
@@jorgeavelar98 being made whole on a unicorn investment is getting screwed. Time to take your $8/hr hat off and think like the big boys.
@@Omikoshi78 Not exactly. They invest in hundreds of startups, and they know that almost none of them will be successful unicorns. Anything that doesn't go belly-up is a win to hedge the losses and hope for one big fish.
@@darkwoodmovies They count on 1/N being a unicorn. When it becomes 1/(2N) their math collapses.
@@Omikoshi78 Are you that dense? These deals are invented and structured by VCs to circumvent anti-trust M&A regulations, VC still gets paid out and they transition under the legal radar. There's a reason M&A volume drop massively since 2020 because of tighter scrutiny from regulators.
If you're clueless then stop pretending you're one of the 'big boys'. So embarrassing.
This is the first time that I can recall seeing this Anchor, Ms Bosa. This reporting was really well done and captured the issues succinctly with just enough detail to satisfy. Well done.
Very well done, and as a side-note, can you spell, "G-O-R-G-E-O-U-S??"
@@Davethreshold I could, however, while the spirit is willing, the flesh is weak...
It’s fine marry her
how? like cnbc owns most of small tv channels that have stopped showing what they want to since they were captured
Weren’t they firing all of those same people just some months ago???
They're firing tech workers for sure. But not AI engineers. They're highly sought out right now.
Low level positions are gone because of AI, AI engineers are in high demand
Yes. Several people have boomeranged from faang to startups, back to faang. It’s very Silicon Valley.
No they were firing Software Engineers in some teams to ship those jobs off to India and Mexico as remote work + their hope is the remaining Software Engineers use Ai programming tools to do more work
ways to crushed other competitions
People are moving to better paying jobs. Isn't job mobility part of the free market capitalism?
It’s straight out of the spineless coward’s playbook
Yes let them fight for employees. @@enadegheeghaghe6369
The competition is free to decline if they think they can outcompete big tech and do better on their own
It's not about competition. These little companies don't have anywhere near the capital to compete with Google or the likes. It's about acquiring as much specialized talent as possible as quickly as possible without having to train them.
More reporting like this please!
Corporate AI, what could go wrong?
I like open source models because you can customize them and have unrestricted models.
Still glad to see AI growing
This is a mistake for the most ambitious engineers.
They're turning themselves into cogs in the big tech machine rather than masters of their own domain in their startups
You clearly have never been a founder. There is no choice here for the founders. You either join big tech or you you loose all your top talent to big tech. In other words, or you go to big tech or you let your company die slowly.
@@pedromarques9267 or the big tech hires 10 people and copies you
Building these huge AI models is extremely expensive and time consuming. It's not like making a new website or app.
These people don't care about the tech or creating viable companies that can do something good and employ people. All they care about is how much money they make when they exit. That's the startup mentality. Start a company, hype it up, exit with 100s of millions, rinse and repeat.
@@pedromarques9267 Like Graphcore. Softbank gave them a lifeline from bankruptcy/insolvency but still...competing NVIDIA, AMD, and now Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon who're designing and manufacturing AI-focused chips in-house is a herculean task. They focused on the Chinese market where Huawei and Alibaba are also ramping up capacity for in-house AI chip design and manufacturing. There is just no way a startup can compete with these mega-caps.
AI in investment is now a fun flash game changer for future endurance in tech and droid curses.
The definition of a monopoly is bound by pricing. Not market power or market share. The question on which all probes rely is, "does this lead to increased cost for consumers?". And since they don't, the govt. will probably lose in court.
Ok yeah, it's definitely time to break up all of these trillion+ dollar companies. The tech industry went from incredible and innovative to lazy and dystopian way too quickly.
Are any AI companies actually profitable? Don’t they lose millions of dollars per cycle? Their’s rumors that Open AI (the company that started this hype train) is reportedly 5 BILLION dollars in debt and headed towards bankruptcy in a year. How are these companies staying afloat, and considering the cost needed to simply maintain let alone train these models; how are companies ever going to get the average consumer to care about generative AI and make profits? It feels like their racing to a future that the majority of the working world doesn’t care about, doesn’t know about, and aren’t ready for. This seems like it will lead to an eventual collapse like Bitcoin and NFT’s. You can’t push change onto people.
Exactly i just saw that Open AI is valued at $100 Billion. I'm like based on what😂😂..
Nvidia is worth the same as Apple with less than half it's revenue. What do u think happens to Nvidia, Open Ai and the other AI companies in the next 5 years?
Gov is gonna bail em out. USA is gonna be like Argentina/USSR especially IF Kamala wins. Tehe tehe.
Good question.
The thesis is as follows: nobody yet knows where the value capture is in the AI-tech stack. Is it chips, data centers, LLMs, chatbots, robots or more.
As there is no definitive answer, the default focus is on infrastructure. A "who's building the rails" sort of thinking. This explains Nvidia's salience in the AI discussion.
You're right that training is costly, but inference even more so. That's where Groq is building it's moat. Chamath's an investor in Groq.
So, they might be losing money now, but game theory tells us that all companies are under pressure to say and invest in generative AI. As Nadella said, the cost of losing out is higher than the cost of buying chips. At least that's the core market force.
@@ishan1920 How long can they keep this up through before it eventually collapses? If the average people doesn’t care enough to buy into it; how can these companies afford to even stay operating? I don’t even get how investors have let them get this far.
@@apricotmadness4850 I'm predicting this all comes down starting with Nvidia 3T valuation. I'm still trying to understand what keeps Bitcion up?
And they’re also laying off\ firing their employees on a quarterly basis to minimise the impact of their exorbitant expenditure. Employees are now just collateral damage in their quest for increased profits.
No they're not
Just wow so many exciting things happening in tech 👩🏽💻
Microsoft AI is the best. It is more intelligent than others.
Interesting. Would like to know if there’s data that can verify this anecdotal reporting.
Oh now they’re doing the opposite of laying off 🙄
@@frightone 😢
they're using 100 million to try and hire off like only 1000 people.
They're looking for diamonds, not some regular rocks.
They’re laying off their non AI employees.
@@69memnon69 exactly. the whole lay off was because of the raise of AI, not a blind lay off from all departments.
The grass is always greener…. Didn’t those large companies just layoff a bunch of people! I guess they can try to make as much as they can before those same companies lay them off AGAIN! They’ll basically become gig tech workers….🤔
Thank you very much for such a detailed analysis, everything became clear.
Your approach to trading is truly impressive and inspiring to succeed. Thank you for teaching me so much!
Remember the time when Big Tech didn't want to give us real distance wireless charging because the energy loss would be catastrophic if multiplied by billions of cellphone users? And now they're building AI data centers like energy consumption is not an issue...
New Technology Revolution Deirdre! You are a great guide for this wonderful journey 📈🇺🇸
Another approach would be follow the 3M Company business model by promoting intrapreneurship, perhaps?
Bro, that’s what im doing actually now. Coz im not going to compete with this big tech. intrapreneurship is the way forward now, see the great example of the team who build gmail where google emplyees got the message.
@@coodi_16 Intrapreneurship is a corporate culture where a big tech giant encourages their subsidiaries or even their teams to pursue innovative endeavours. So, despite being acquired by a tech giant, this approach keeps the intrapreneurship and the team or smaller company's approach, culture and mindset intact.
And if this is what you are doing already, then that's excellent. Congratulations and Best of luck.
Just to get laid off , because of AI a few years later
And yet these are the same assholes who force employees to sign Non-Competitive clauses.
And then layoff thousands of them.
Generative Ai is just a bubble there are far more important and useful areas of AI
I bet many AI Startups exists solely to get snatched up by the big companies. The big companies found out that AI is easy to build with the right talent but really hard to make money from. Instead of acquiring the AI start up, they snipe their top talent. Monetizing AI will still be a challenge. They have to find customers to pay service fees for that AI. Google, Amazon, Microsoft will be trying to out price and out feature each other. Thus razor thin profit margins if they can make any profit at all. Their customers want AI to replace some of their low end human workers for the cheapest possible price and most features.
In short AI is just gonna be another tech job and the Big companies will want just a few of the top engineers or managers and the rest they will hire fresh college grads they can pay cheap.
pretty good reporting
That's the fault of startups and VCs not giving enough money for talent. FAANG offers maybe 500k-1million for AI talent with top tier benefits. A startup offers maybe 200-250k base, < 0.5% equity for most such that even if the startup exists at 1 billion in 5 years (ideal scenario), you'd have roughly earned the same amount working at FAANG.
VCs needs to dish out more funding, and founders need to dish out more incentives and equity to keep talent. It's nice to see individuals being treated as hard to replace finally in a tech environment where everyone is deemed replacable.
They just gotta make sure there’s no Non competes
Good thing the wunderkind don't need colleagues to bounce ideas off of, to grind rough ideas into shape. It's also great that nobody can see what becomes of the supporting staff.
really appreciate your trading expertise. Thank you for sharing your knowledge with us!
Tech crunch coming soon, AI taking over.
Soon they will not need you to spill their corporate talking points.
No mention of how much returns the VC's were getting if not the standard 5-10x
Yes, your information is valuable.
Generative AI wrote the script for this video which I thought sucked
Where's your proof?
I hope all together.
Interesting story thanks. The best part of this video was Deirdre Bosa. Have a good one.
And NVDA has a monopoly on this?
1:11 Shouldn’t the proposition be “on” that day???
Let the market sort itself out
The cost in hardware, energy and human resources needed to run the all AI internet we're headed towards is immense. If you live near a big server-farm get out now, they will always have priority over electricity even over hospitals.
Bruvh, hire me i would do anything... ANYTHING for one of those jobs.
Then they’ll not need you
It's not AI, stop throwing buzzword everywhere to get attention. It's just a more advance algorithm.
AI stocks are set to dominate in 2024. I prefer NVIDIA because it is well-positioned to sustain long-term growth potential and offers a platform for other AI companies. I know someone who has seen returns of over 200% from NVIDIA. I'm also open to any other recommendations you may have.
I believe the next major breakthrough will be in A.I. For sustained growth similar to META, it's crucial to avoid making impulsive decisions based on short-term market fluctuations. Instead, prioritize patience and maintain a long-term perspective. Consider seeking financial advisory services to make informed buying and selling decisions.
In a similar situation, I sought advice from a financial advisor. By restructuring my portfolio and diversifying with good ETFs, the S&P 500, and growth stocks, I was able to grow my portfolio from $200,000 to over $800,000 in just a few years.
Your advisor must be really good, I hope it's okay to inquire if you're still collaborating with the same advisor and how I can get in touch with them?
I work with Claire Robert’s Durand as my fiduciary advisor. Simply look up the name. You would discover the information you needed to schedule an appointment.
While they are looking inward they are not looking at the biggest threat- china's AI 😅😊
I thought AI was the talent,😃
Tech has become another tool for the government.
The employees and investors wouldn't have to be bag holders if Lina Khan and the FTC weren't so antimergers. #gaslighting
The problem is not “we need more mergers”. The problem is the Feds need to close these loopholes that allow these backdoor mergers.
I want to start trading quotes, how many dollars can I start with and do I need to use a broker?
This is called monopoly power
Автор видоса рассказал про отличную связку, давно на вас подписан в тг!
Lol, weren't you guys saying AI was dying some time ago? Yet you're still reporting on it.
Violation check
Good luck big tech
big tech is the most competitive its ever been, particularly on the ai front. This is about regulators wanting control rather than competition
The entire oracle vs Google and the apple vs ? And Microsoft vs ? And us vs .?. Cases were are similar and it was all overturned and ftc sec have only Congress and supreme 😢court and federal court and stillust listen to civil criminal and not just state overturned cases.
is any ai company profitable?
Companies that own Genrative AI tools maybe.
Yes google amazon meta all use ai to give us recommendations and are crazy profitable
No😂. The crash is going too be fun.
So funny, nobody I know likes AI or wants to use it. What a waste and suckering in investors is a joke.
While I think most investors are being suckered, there is some great use of AI. At my business, AI monitors all of our text messages and fax. When certain keywords are encountered, the information is immediately directed to the right person to address the matter. All of our client conversations are recorded, summarized and store into a RAG system for each client. It allows any of our staff who communicates with that client to be immediately knowledgeable on that client. AI has been a game-changer for us while our competitors aren't using AI.
@@haroldpierre1726 The average Joe I know doesn't want it and many have used computers for a very long time. I personally after watching the 60 min. inventor of AI that spent most of his life inventing it, stated that without some rules laid down, it will eventually lead to bad consquences and the rules are NOT being laid down for it. Yes, it is powerful and has good use to it; but used the wrong way could turn things disastrous and cost business and customers a lot of money in the long run.
@@Boxagami Fortunately, there isn't AN inventor of AI. Hundreds, if not thousands, of researchers have contributed to the development of the field since the 1950s. Even the most important modern research paper on AI, "Attention Is All You Need," had 8 authors.
The experts in the field do not agree that AI will be necessarily evil. There are those who are optimistic and those who are pessimistic. What I do know is that capitalism will always push for the technology that increases productivity and profits regardless of the consequences.
very funny to write this on a video that you are only watching because of AI
@@haroldpierre1726 The inventor of AI is on 60 min. Interview that can be found on YT. I forgot his name, but if you look it up you can see for yourself. AI tells lies and that is dangerous.. I have conversed with It many times and it craftly lies over and over again. I must be the only person able to catch it in lies and I find that to be dangerous. Yes, we know what business will do to save money in the short term. We also know what happens to companies who don't have the brains to see the negatives long-term. They end up bankrupt and lose everything.. The idea of AI is I agree nothing new and was thought up way before many of the younger generations were even born.
Monopoly.
AI companies need to be seperate from other corporations.
Companies need to be broken up into their seperate functions, we don't need megacorps that do everything at the same time
@@ayoCClol good luck with that, AI companies burn through cash the only reason we are this far with AI is bc of the megacorps.
You know what it's called when multiple "monopolies" are competing for top talent?
Competition
This doesn’t improve competition
So Darpa...darpa is stealing talent
Robinson Edward Garcia Michael Miller Donald
Big Tech takin notes from Trump
Wilson Donna Hernandez Dorothy Thomas Edward
Lewis Jennifer Miller Donna Moore Nancy
Did she have to pee? She kept moving a lot in her chair.
Harris Sharon Rodriguez Donald Brown Jason
Hall Larry Hall Anthony Moore George
Martin Larry Young Jason Robinson Kevin
Thompson Maria Anderson Michael Moore Mary
With an unexpected demise of my job at the age of 39, 425,000 saved for retirement, 10,000 in an HSA, and a house worth up to an additional 200,000, I'm looking for ways to generate passive income. What are some promising options?
It makes sense to consider hiring a financial advisor at this point, but delaying retirement for a bit might be a more prudent choice
I’m confused about whether to combine all my investment accounts into one. If I decide to do this, how should I go about it, and will there be any consequences I should be aware of? I also intend to sell my property, which could add an extra 200K overtime. Should I consolidate everything into one investment account, or diversify across several sectors?
These are important questions for a financial planner. I met mine at a NYSE event, and she helped my wife and i rebalance our 1.7 million portfolio between a traditional IRA and a brokerage account. She has been trading with our permission and has managed to recoup our financial losses thrice over again. We keep and manage the market cautiously.
That is impressive! my portfolio has remained stagnate. Who is guiding you please?
*June Renae Matthysse*
She is well known, so you can look her up online.
Williams Betty White Jose Allen Kenneth
Hall Margaret Clark Margaret Williams Lisa
Johnson Sarah Martinez Barbara Walker Angela
Aren't those things just "If/else statements"?
สวัสดีครับ
Какой же ты все таки лакер, бро) Не видел таких заносов ни у кого!
Gonzalez Nancy Gonzalez Ronald Smith Karen
White Brenda Davis Sandra Johnson David
привет лаба
😂😊
❤❤❤❤❤
++ paoching***
█▬█ █ ▀█▀
I farted in a jar
Terrible editing and presentation.
Google just randomly charged me $21 for Google AI I never signed up for. I don't think they're doing too great right now. Open AI and the competition is way better. Except for Anthropic. claude is way too politically correct and annoying.
Oliver, ¿tienes algún consejo sobre cómo manejar el estrés en el trading? ��🏔
It is a very nice video. I think This type of video will help many people to make money on trading online.