Aer Lingus A321neo declared MAYDAY due to fire in the galley. Washington Dulles. Real ATC

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 дек 2024

Комментарии • 189

  • @morg4
    @morg4 2 года назад +62

    Lol I was on this plane, was very relaxed situation - all we knew was there an issue with the oven, no idea about the fire until we landed and saw all the emergency vehicles. Still took the same plane after 2 hours on the tarmac - but there was no hot food obviously 😂 the whole crew were great

    • @YouCanSeeATC
      @YouCanSeeATC  2 года назад +8

      😄. Thank you for the information 🙂

    • @GreatCdn59
      @GreatCdn59 2 года назад +17

      sometimes when watching these videos, I wonder what the passengers were feeling/thinking. Thanks for the comment. Glad to hear it wasn't too scary!

    • @msjdb723
      @msjdb723 2 года назад +1

      @@GreatCdn59 Me too!

  • @penguins9645
    @penguins9645 2 года назад +94

    Wow, absolutely flawless handling by ATC, immediate clearance & vectors as soon as the emergency was declared. The pilots had their hands full.

    • @roberthudson1959
      @roberthudson1959 2 года назад +2

      Don't agree. He asked for fuel remaining in flight time remaining, got it, then asked for fuel remaining by weight.

    • @karhukivi
      @karhukivi 2 года назад

      @@roberthudson1959 The mayday call was downgraded to pan; fuel in time to facilitate handling and in weight to assess the fire hazard.

    • @kirilmihaylov1934
      @kirilmihaylov1934 2 года назад

      @@karhukivi was their fire

    • @armoredgaming2352
      @armoredgaming2352 2 года назад

      that's what working inside the DC SFRA does to you! one of the most stressful environments, considering that KIAD isn't all too busy compared to other major airports

  • @todd614oh
    @todd614oh 2 года назад +96

    “I’ll give it to you in kilograms…” = “no time for converting to imperialism” 🤣😂

    • @JayJay5244
      @JayJay5244 2 года назад +4

      Which is ironic considering the altitude is still given in feet 😂

    • @leifvejby8023
      @leifvejby8023 2 года назад +1

      @@JayJay5244 Altitude is given in ft prevent confusion with visual range given in meters. Or speed given in kts.

    • @JayJay5244
      @JayJay5244 2 года назад +2

      @@leifvejby8023 I’m no pilot just an aviation enthusiast so forgive my ignorance but I’ve never heard of visual ranges being given in kilometers. Even when talking about airport distances or close by traffic, it’s all given in miles as far as I’ve heard. And yeah speed being in knots has a historical reason I guess. Much was copy/pasted from the maritime culture.

    • @78bollox
      @78bollox 2 года назад +1

      Imperial measurement - lbs / stone / ounces etc
      Imperialism - policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force.
      😂 But you're kind of right anyway

    • @JayJay5244
      @JayJay5244 2 года назад +4

      @@78bollox lol I think it was suppose to be a joke 😂

  • @D-C.
    @D-C. 2 года назад +8

    And this is why I like a human being sat up front controlling my plane, not a computer. The epitome of what a good pilot should be like. Excellent work from all concerned.

  • @alansimpson596
    @alansimpson596 2 года назад +39

    Aer Lingus is a great airline and the professionalism of their crews is well demonstrated in this reconstruction.

  • @MrLee025
    @MrLee025 2 года назад +29

    Near 21 tonnes of fuel on board. That A321 neo is a monster

    • @brianlacroix822
      @brianlacroix822 2 года назад +4

      it's just a simp version of a 757

    • @Therealprinceofcobh
      @Therealprinceofcobh 2 года назад +5

      @@brianlacroix822 but it’s not though it’s a much better aircraft

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 2 года назад +1

      That a small passenger jet...!!

    • @LimerickWarrior1
      @LimerickWarrior1 Месяц назад +1

      @@Therealprinceofcobh True the doors don't fall off....

    • @Therealprinceofcobh
      @Therealprinceofcobh Месяц назад

      @@LimerickWarrior1 why thank you good sir.

  • @cedarkey
    @cedarkey 2 года назад +62

    Nicely handled by the crew.
    Not rushed into a quick return, but only accepted vectors when they were ready.
    The word ‘Standby’ used to very good effect, to tell ATC to essentially ‘leave them alone’ as they’re busy with flying the aircraft, going through checklists, liaising with flight attendants etc.
    ☘️

    • @RLTtizME
      @RLTtizME 2 года назад +2

      Do you usually over-think everything?

    • @chapuisat9978
      @chapuisat9978 2 года назад +5

      and why do not rush into quick return? active fire onboard is an immediate return to field. no matter what. just like ATC said. Right turn to field.

    • @QFWP
      @QFWP 2 года назад +6

      @@chapuisat9978 I'd think the pilots had the best knowledge about what they are trained to do in this situation. They had faith that if the FA's told them the fire was out, then it was. Downgrading from Emergency to PAN is then appropriate. Run all the checklists for fire emergency, then returning they'd have considered an overweight landing and getting set up for 19L. Lots of things for them to do, prioritise and return safely to field all in good time.

    • @ihateusernamesgrrr
      @ihateusernamesgrrr 2 года назад +2

      @@QFWP Pan is still an emergency, it's just not imminent threat to life in the same way a mayday is.
      Also "faith" isn't a word I ever want to hear muttered from a pilot. Either the pilot knows or they don't know. If they are relying on faith then everybody onboard is up shit creek.
      I don't really have any problem with your comment but words do matter and the definitions associated make a whole world of difference.
      I would respond differently to somebody telling me "this is what I know" compared to "I have faith that everything is fine".
      That said ATC should respond the same to both "mayday mayday mayday" and "panpan panpan" in giving both urgency as they are both emergency calls. Although a pan call might not need the trucks, situational context would determine that not some rando comment like mine online lol.

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 2 года назад +2

      If you really have a fire....you RUSH....

  • @austintx_planespotter8561
    @austintx_planespotter8561 2 года назад +44

    Okay, who forgot the pie in the oven.

    • @AlaskaErik
      @AlaskaErik 2 года назад +5

      My first thought was the previous crew left something combustible in the oven and the new crew did not verify the oven was empty.

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 2 года назад

      I’ve heard stories about things being out in the oven, including someone’s damp shoes, so it could have been anything.

    • @brianlacroix822
      @brianlacroix822 2 года назад

      @@AlaskaErik it's up to the caterers to properly load the racks of Y meals and to ensure the oven is clear of anything before they load the racks. and it's up to the airline to maintain the ovens so they don't short. oven fires are very simple to fight even an fa can do it.

    • @AlaskaErik
      @AlaskaErik 2 года назад +1

      @@brianlacroix822 So you're willing to trust a minimum wage caterer to do their job properly?! I spent a career in aviation and we always backed each other up. FAs should always inspect each oven before they turn them on. They were the last link in the error chain in this situation and bear part of the blame.

    • @brianlacroix822
      @brianlacroix822 2 года назад +1

      @@AlaskaErik we don't even know what happened

  • @blumac9801
    @blumac9801 2 года назад +25

    0:24 you can hear the master warning go off

  • @michaelrainone296
    @michaelrainone296 2 года назад

    Great job of communicating with that pilot!! Air traffic controllers are so awesome.They deal with so much during a shift. Great skill and great attitude.Well done.Best wishes from me in 🇨🇦Canada 🇨🇦.

  • @WillG_G
    @WillG_G 2 года назад +11

    Mayday Mayday Mayday sends shivers every time I hear it

  • @pipebo
    @pipebo 2 года назад +29

    Shamrock crew were a class act, as always. Fire on an airplane is an emergency until proven otherwise. Mayday was the right initial call here. There’s no room to be indecisive (as often seems to be the case with American crews, for some reason).

    • @N1120A
      @N1120A Месяц назад

      If there was a fire on board any US airline, it would be an immediate emergency and return to the field.

  • @Airblader
    @Airblader 2 года назад +13

    "Fuel in minutes?"
    *Gives it in hours*
    "Do you have that in pounds?"
    "I can give it in kg"

    • @grinner2916
      @grinner2916 2 года назад +10

      In that situation the crew have got to fly the aeroplane, coordinate checklists, communicate with the cabin crew and debrief for the return - they are not doing nothing when you can't hear them talking!. In other words, their workload would have been quite high and to be asked for fuel in minutes takes brainpower to convert the amount on board into hours then minutes - much easier to give an estimate based on planned flight time and reserves without then multiplying by 60. Also, around the rest of the world, fuel gauges display contents in Kgs not pounds. Again, easier to read off the dial than to use extra brainpower to multiply by 2.2. The person with the lower workload on the ground can do the maths.

  • @stevenmc4446
    @stevenmc4446 2 года назад +2

    great training and procedures from all and just because someone burnt the dinner!

  • @adyback7994
    @adyback7994 2 года назад +2

    Amazing communication by all involved.

  • @dhammarosi
    @dhammarosi 2 года назад +14

    Downgraded from mayday to frying pan pan pan 😅
    Hmm, isn't that an overweight landing with all that fuel and full flight?

    • @grinner2916
      @grinner2916 2 года назад +1

      Yes.

    • @grinner2916
      @grinner2916 2 года назад +1

      Not an issue on the A321 up to MTOW

    • @dhammarosi
      @dhammarosi 2 года назад

      @@grinner2916 ah, interesting, that's handy. Thanks for the info!

  • @danielconlon2388
    @danielconlon2388 2 года назад +5

    Aerlingus crew always professional

  • @waynemartin4881
    @waynemartin4881 2 года назад +10

    I reckon the supervisor in the back Galley possibly started cooking the meals on the taxi to save time in the air which isn’t allowed, all ovens should be switched off for taxi and take off and the angle of the take off may have spilled some greasy liquid out of the meal containers that caught fire. I’m a crew member for another airline and I’ve seen supers do that in the past to save time. As part of the supers check, they will have gone through the galley with the caterer to make sure they have enough catering for the entire flight, they have to open all ovens to count the meals loaded.

    • @YouCanSeeATC
      @YouCanSeeATC  2 года назад +2

      Thank you for the information 👍

    • @cedarkey
      @cedarkey 2 года назад +7

      That requirement to have ovens off for taxi/take off is not a requirement at many airlines. Those ovens can take 45 mins to reheat the meals , so it’s normal to have begun the reheating process while on the ground (the meals are already cooked prior to arriving at the aircraft), so that the meals are ready for serving once the aircraft has levelled off at its cruising level.

    • @Tellemore
      @Tellemore 2 года назад +2

      Is that as a result of your thorough investigation or are you simply jumping to a conclusion?

    • @waynemartin4881
      @waynemartin4881 2 года назад +3

      @@Tellemore most oven fires are due to spilled food !

    • @patm8622
      @patm8622 2 года назад +2

      Assumptions are never a good idea, let's wait for an official statement.

  • @starwarzchik112
    @starwarzchik112 2 года назад +4

    Sorry, that was me, I was making toast.

  • @rvboondocker2559
    @rvboondocker2559 2 года назад +8

    Wow! Terrific animation!

    • @msjdb723
      @msjdb723 2 года назад

      So cool to see a boondocker in here! I boondocked around mostly out west for a year or two. But some also going back and forth to Florida.
      Happy travels. 👍🏻

  • @chapuisat9978
    @chapuisat9978 2 года назад +6

    don't sure if the fire warning was out at 00:24, but why stay airborne with an active fire at 01:14 ? as ATC said perfectly: right turn direct to field .. the professionell firefighter are on the ground not on board the airplane...

    • @go2sh
      @go2sh 2 года назад +6

      There is one big sentence in aviation: Aviate, Navigate, Communicate. Aviate: You have to gain some height in order to create space to aviate properly. Compare there height during 01:14 to the height at the final approach. They are more then 1000 feet to high to take a direct approach. Navigate: Its way easier for them to fly the ILS and reduce the work load by commencing a proper set up approach, then just going straight for the visual. Communicate: They were very clear what they want.
      For us its hart to asses what the situation on board was. I guess the pilots, where aware of the size and severity of the fire to asses the situation correctly.

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 2 года назад +1

      The thing to remember is that the information they’re getting from the cabin crew and so the pilots have to determine what to do based on someone else’s opinion. If the cabin crew said it looks like a small fire and it’ll be out shortly then it’s not an emergency and no need for a dire return to land. That being said, the pilots need to position themselves for a quick return in case the fire cannot be put out or gets worse.

    • @Sugah_J
      @Sugah_J 2 года назад +8

      @@go2sh I completely agree. It doesn’t matter that you’re on fire if you just crash and burn anyway because of an unstable approach.

  • @Ztbmrc1
    @Ztbmrc1 2 года назад +3

    Could it be possible that the cabin crew already put some food in the oven before take-off, so it would be ready to serve shortly after take-off? Hope the damage caused was not to severe. Fortunately no one got hurt.

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 2 года назад +1

      That is what usually happens...
      The dirty ovens smoke.......
      Not unusual. ...

  • @bobbybecker6435
    @bobbybecker6435 2 года назад

    Very well done.

  • @brianlacroix822
    @brianlacroix822 2 года назад

    why is their call sign 11P instead of the flight number 116?

  • @cianor
    @cianor 2 года назад

    Was that on Aer Lingus new 321 neo?

  • @philipbrit13
    @philipbrit13 2 года назад +1

    20.8 metric tonnes does not seem much for a Trans Atlantic crossing. That’s around 45 thousand pounds ??

    • @eamonahern7495
      @eamonahern7495 2 года назад +2

      The A321 is a narrow body so it's smaller than aircraft that would traditionally have made the crossing. The engines in the neo variants of Airbus planes are very efficient.

  • @Dirk-van-den-Berg
    @Dirk-van-den-Berg 2 года назад

    This is really odd. The controller is talking about runway 19L. Usually runways in this configuration are called L C and R from the equator's perspective, is that correct? But when you look at Google Maps, the north-south runways are called 1, not 19.
    Can someone explain this to me?

    • @air47wa
      @air47wa 2 года назад +5

      It's runway 1 if you are on a heading of 10 degrees (magnetic) when you land or takeoff. It is runway 19 if you are on a heading of 190 when you land or takeoff. The runway number corresponds to the compass heading you should be on when using the runway. All runways have two numbers (Heathrow, for example, has runways 09 L and R and 27 L and R). I hope this helps.

    • @lyaneris
      @lyaneris Год назад

      Also L/C/R refers to left/centre/right RWY :)

  • @wyrmhand
    @wyrmhand 2 года назад +18

    First time I hear a downgrade of en emergency.

    • @YouCanSeeATC
      @YouCanSeeATC  2 года назад +6

      That was first time for me as well 🙂👍😎

    • @RonPiggott
      @RonPiggott 2 года назад

      @@YouCanSeeATC Honestly who cares about the aircraft. The only thing that matters are flight crew and the passengers. You can get another plane. Just so glad the people travelling were safe.

    • @AMCustomCoasters
      @AMCustomCoasters 2 года назад +2

      My favorite is the Lufthansa 747 pilot refusing to declare an emergency missing an engine. I know it can fly perfectly fine w only 2 or 3 engines but was still a funny clip.

    • @davidkavanagh189
      @davidkavanagh189 2 года назад

      @@AMCustomCoasters You got a link for that?

    • @AMCustomCoasters
      @AMCustomCoasters 2 года назад

      @@davidkavanagh189 ruclips.net/video/z_ewa7R20MA/видео.html

  • @johnvine5731
    @johnvine5731 2 года назад

    The real question is ... did the Greggs steak bake survive the ordeal?

  • @ReaperRowledge
    @ReaperRowledge 2 года назад +4

    Did i hear the smoke/fire alarm going off????? DING DING DING? 0:23

    • @WilliamOfDetroit07
      @WilliamOfDetroit07 2 года назад

      That’s what I was thinking

    • @cedarkey
      @cedarkey 2 года назад +2

      Yes , that’s the master warning. Linked to smoke sensors etc.

    • @blumac9801
      @blumac9801 2 года назад +2

      That was the Galley fire master warning

    • @MartinNeep
      @MartinNeep 2 года назад +1

      Most likely the result of smoke entering one of the aft lavatories. ruclips.net/video/9bYjTfdt-QM/видео.html

  • @lvbricat
    @lvbricat 2 года назад +1

    4:01 I heard 120,1 but in the transcrips says 121,1 I'm practicing for the English test and I don't know if I'm wrong! Probably :(

  • @AsmarterWorld
    @AsmarterWorld 2 года назад +2

    20 tons of fuel is a very heavy landing for a neo 😅

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 2 года назад +1

      Who cares if you think you have a fire....

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 2 года назад +1

      Not a heavy landing....Maybe an overweight landing.
      There is a difference.

  • @mollyfilms
    @mollyfilms 2 года назад +5

    If that had been an American airline would they have declared a Mayday? Suspect not. I think this was perfect comms from the pilots standpoint.

    • @Videos888
      @Videos888 2 года назад

      Everyone would have died because the controller would not have understood that a plane on fire should be given priority landing.

    • @lyaneris
      @lyaneris Год назад

      It depends, AAL pilots are pretty on the ball with Maydays lately

    • @N1120A
      @N1120A Месяц назад

      Every US airline pilot would have promptly declared an emergency and returned to the field.

  • @jamessimms415
    @jamessimms415 2 года назад

    Clearly more efficient than the 747 cargo hold fire @ Narita or others.

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 2 года назад +1

      There’s a very big difference between an oven fire and a cargo fire.

  • @cedarkey
    @cedarkey 2 года назад

    That thumbnail… it has the strangest looking Neo gear I’ve ever seen. 😉

  • @philipbrit13
    @philipbrit13 2 года назад

    Oh. Ok. 320. I was thinking 330.

  • @MattyEngland
    @MattyEngland 2 года назад +14

    We don't use lbs round these parts, I'll give it ta ya in pints of Guinness laddy

  • @tillycatcat
    @tillycatcat 2 года назад +21

    Perfect example of why ICAO (and FAA) language is so effective. Controller knew about the downgrade with a Pan-Pan immediately, and was able to pass that info on.
    None of this declaring and emergency business and then a long old conversation to tell them that it’s kinda not an emergency, but still need priority to land. 😂😂😂

    • @RLTtizME
      @RLTtizME 2 года назад +6

      Your assertion is a crock. It makes NO DIFFERENCE declaring an emergency or Mayday or Pan or Spatula. None. You people see problems where there are none.

    • @RomeoJulietCharlie
      @RomeoJulietCharlie 2 года назад +2

      Mayday/Pan-Pan is absolutely the best way of unambiguously categorising and communicating emergency or urgency situations. It’s especially important in regions where English isn’t the first language, even if the controllers are supposedly proficient. It leaves nobody on frequency in any doubt. Completely agree that it prevents lengthy explanation when your attention is better focussed on the situation on your airplane.
      While you may get away with a less structured approach, there are recent examples of ATC not realising that an aircraft was in peril due to lack of standard phraseology, and that’s in the US! You need something you can rely on anywhere in the aviation world. Calling the use of standard phraseology a crock is just nonsense.

    • @RLTtizME
      @RLTtizME 2 года назад +1

      @@RomeoJulietCharlie All made up non issues. Emergency works just as well. Real world experience proves it. At least use words that don’t make people laugh. 🤡🤡👍🤣🤪👈

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 2 года назад +1

      @@RomeoJulietCharlie Hi RJ
      Don't listen to RTL.
      Just a troll who hasn't got the intellectual integrity to ever be a professional pilot...never will be...
      LTR say nothing and people might just think you are intelligent.

    • @daftvader4218
      @daftvader4218 2 года назад +3

      @@RLTtizME Only amateurs that don't know air law will do that.
      These terms work all over world especially those whose English is their second language. .. but of course you would not know that from a couch.

  • @RaineStudio
    @RaineStudio 2 года назад +3

    Shamrock 11-Papa, say fuel remaining in drams.

    • @davidkavanagh189
      @davidkavanagh189 2 года назад

      😂😂

    • @bcdm999
      @bcdm999 2 года назад +2

      Shamrock 11P, while you're at it, if we can get fuel in millilitres, cubic yards, and hogsheads, please

    • @billythekid3234
      @billythekid3234 2 года назад

      Worse they could have asked for it in Grams!

  • @kerimvarol4707
    @kerimvarol4707 2 года назад +2

    We are deeply saddened by a plane crash or a tragic aviation accident in any country in the world.

  • @EdOeuna
    @EdOeuna 2 года назад +5

    It’s one of those difficult situations because the pilots don’t have any easy access to what is going on and require regular sit reps from the cabin before being able to make any decisions themselves. Usually the flight deck gets split within one pilot flying and the other running the checklists and getting busy speaking to the cabin crew.
    Maybe mayday as a bit unnecessary unless the cabin crew felt overwhelmed by the fire and didn’t believe they could extinguish it.

    • @YouCanSeeATC
      @YouCanSeeATC  2 года назад

      👍

    • @Sugah_J
      @Sugah_J 2 года назад +11

      I would argue the use of mayday was adequate in this situation because they didn’t know if the fire was spreading or what the situation was. Plus it gets the attention of ATC. Then downgrading it was a pro move. But there’s always a thousand ways to do things

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 2 года назад +5

      @@Sugah_J - I agree with that. You want to be in the process of getting the aircraft back on the ground ASAP whilst waiting for updates from the cabin. Hopefully the second call from the cabin isn’t “we’ve used 5 extinguishers and the fire hasn’t gone out”. If that’s the case then it’s all about getting back on the ground ASAP with full emergency services and probably an evacuation on the runway.

    • @soniclettuce
      @soniclettuce 2 года назад +4

      @@EdOeuna Mentour Pilot's channel has a good video where he talks about why fires are treated so urgently. Apparently once an in-flight fire is out of control, you have about 15-20 minutes before the smoke and fumes heat up to the point of ignition, causing a massive flashover that kills everyone on board. Even if you're 99% confident you can control it, on the 1% chance you can't, you're really going to wish you called mayday and started heading back for the field 2 minutes ago. Uncontrolled fire is apparently one of the few situations where the manual tells you to think about off-field landings.

    • @EdOeuna
      @EdOeuna 2 года назад +3

      @@soniclettuce - I don’t, generally, follow people like Mentor pilot or 74 crew because their content is mostly directed towards aviation enthusiasts.
      Last time I had a lav fire, in the sim, we were on late downwind turning base by the time the fire was under control. Like you said,

  • @daftvader4218
    @daftvader4218 2 года назад +2

    Why didn't they just turn the ovens off and wait a short time.....and the old spilled food/liquid in the ovens would soon stop smoking........then inspect each oven !???
    No an uncommon phenomenon.
    Hence the pilot quickly changed a mayday to a pan.....
    Why not continue after a simple check.......no much to go wrong or burn on a oven....but food !!
    Had it myself a few times...

  • @steve1978ger
    @steve1978ger 2 года назад +18

    I'll give it to you in kilograms :/

    • @duk2k
      @duk2k 2 года назад +13

      That is what everyone using around the world

    • @MattyEngland
      @MattyEngland 2 года назад +11

      I thought pints would be more appropriate.

    • @hades_monsta
      @hades_monsta 2 года назад +19

      @@duk2k also the plane is either configured in pounds or in KG, the pilots had better things to do than converting it

    • @duk2k
      @duk2k 2 года назад +2

      @@hades_monsta that is true

    • @gibbosan1
      @gibbosan1 2 года назад

      @@duk2k Sorry, but that is incorrect. I've flown in a few Airlines (Far East and Middle East) where the airplanes were calibrated in pounds. Most Airlines in the USA are using pounds as that is the standard measure there.

  • @thedevilinthecircuit1414
    @thedevilinthecircuit1414 2 года назад

    I hate it when Angus burns popcorn in the microwave!

  • @deakhanani
    @deakhanani 2 года назад

    LMFAO!!!!!

  • @NeilBaileyF1
    @NeilBaileyF1 2 года назад

    What does anybody expect from Aer Lingus? Technical faults, delayed flights. Worst airline in Western Europe.

    • @lyaneris
      @lyaneris Год назад

      You really forgot Ryan Air?

  • @danizweifler6061
    @danizweifler6061 2 года назад +6

    typical USA: the controllers wanna have the remaining fuel in lbs............ = like a first grader who is not yet capable to do the math by his own....... :-(🤮

    • @captaindunsel2806
      @captaindunsel2806 2 года назад +5

      When Neil Armstrong landed on the Moon, the Eagle only had 770 lbs of fuel remaining. Don't know how many thousands of grams that is.

    • @robbflynn4325
      @robbflynn4325 2 года назад +3

      @@captaindunsel2806 you actually believe that we went to the moon, lol

    • @marlonstjohn
      @marlonstjohn 2 года назад +2

      @@captaindunsel2806 The moon has only 1/6 the gravity as on Earth, therefore the Eagle would have had only 128.33 lbs. of fuel remaining.

    • @RonPiggott
      @RonPiggott 2 года назад +1

      I could imagine ATC was as busy as the pilot coordinating with tower.

    • @slappymcgillicuddy7532
      @slappymcgillicuddy7532 2 года назад

      ah adorable, the usual elitist snooty European critic LOL

  • @carforumwanker
    @carforumwanker 2 года назад +2

    If that was Ryan air the passengers would have been charged $100 each for "extra Emergency landing charges )