Hey Insane Curiosity Squad! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it with your friends or on other social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, TikTok and Twitter, etc... (Since the algorithm is not cooperating in showing us to the public 😅). In just 30 seconds, you will greatly help our Channel to grow and improve future contents. A big thank you from all of us.
This is a great video! but unfortunately I can't really visualise the relative sizes of the stars. If there was a simple diagram showing the star compared to our own sun, that would be a fantastic addition! Keep up the great work - these are fascinating!
♦️قال الله تعالى في قصة سليمان مع ملكة سبأ قبل 1441سنة : ( ( قَالَ يَا أَيُّهَا الْمَلَأُ أَيُّكُمْ يَأْتِينِي بِعَرْشِهَا قَبْلَ أَنْ يَأْتُونِي مُسْلِمِينَ * قَالَ عِفْرِيتٌ مِنَ الْجِنِّ أَنَا آتِيكَ بِهِ قَبْلَ أَنْ تَقُومَ مِنْ مَقَامِكَ وَإِنِّي عَلَيْهِ لَقَوِيٌّ أَمِينٌ * قَالَ الَّذِي عِنْدَهُ (عِلْمٌ مِنَ الْكِتَابِ) أَنَا آتِيكَ بِهِ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَرْتَدَّ إِلَيْكَ طَرْفُكَ فَلَمَّا رَآهُ مُسْتَقِرًّا عِنْدَهُ قَالَ هَذَا مِنْ فَضْلِ رَبِّي لِيَبْلُوَنِي أَأَشْكُرُ أَمْ أَكْفُرُ وَمَنْ شَكَرَ فَإِنَّمَا يَشْكُرُ لِنَفْسِهِ وَمَنْ كَفَرَ فَإِنَّ رَبِّي غَنِيٌّ كَرِيمٌ )) النمل/38- 40 . وأنا أقول لكم يا علماء الفلك والفيزياء والكيمياء والرياضيات وجميع علوم الأرض والبحار والفضاء ووو ♦️ أقول لكم أنكم ضعفاء ولا تعلمون إلا الشيء القليل جدا ويكاد يكون صفرا 0 وإني لا أبالغ بحديثي هذا، وإني أخاطبكم وأدعوكم إلى تأمل وتدبر الآية من 38-40 من سورة النمل في عهد النبي الملك سليمان يقوم رجل عنده علم من الكتاب بإحضار عرش الملكة بلقيس من اليمن وحتى القدس الشريف بلمح البصر وبطرفة عين، وأنتم تعرفون المسافة بين اليمن والقدس ،عرش عظيم وثقيل ينقل بسرعة البرق وفي لحظة يستقر أمام النبي سليمان، منذ آلاف السنين فأين علمكم وتطور أبحاتكم يا علماء الدنيا مما سبق ذكره والله إن الإنسان لضعيف إلا من كان مع الله، عندما أقارن بين علم رجل عاش منذ آلاف السنين في عهد سليمان عليه السلام والذي نقل عرشا عظيما للملكة بلقيس من اليمن إلى القدس بلمح البصر، أقارنه بعلومكم أستنتج أنكم وعلومكم ضعفاء وتافهون.وشكرا •{وما أوتيتم من العلم إلا قليلا }•
♦️يقول الله عز وجل قبل 1441سنة : ((قُلْ أَئِنَّكُمْ لَتَكْفُرُونَ بِالَّذِي خَلَقَ الْأَرْضَ فِي يَوْمَيْنِ وَتَجْعَلُونَ لَهُ أَنْدَادًا ذَلِكَ رَبُّ الْعَالَمِينَ * وَجَعَلَ فِيهَا رَوَاسِيَ مِنْ فَوْقِهَا وَبَارَكَ فِيهَا وَقَدَّرَ فِيهَا أَقْوَاتَهَا فِي أَرْبَعَةِ أَيَّامٍ سَوَاءً لِلسَّائِلِينَ * ثُمَّ اسْتَوَى إِلَى السَّمَاءِ وَهِيَ دُخَانٌ فَقَالَ لَهَا وَلِلْأَرْضِ ائْتِيَا طَوْعًا أَوْ كَرْهًا قَالَتَا أَتَيْنَا طَائِعِينَ * فَقَضَاهُنَّ سَبْعَ سَمَاوَاتٍ فِي يَوْمَيْنِ وَأَوْحَى فِي كُلِّ سَمَاءٍ أَمْرَهَا وَزَيَّنَّا السَّمَاءَ الدُّنْيَا بِمَصَابِيحَ وَحِفْظًا ذَلِكَ تَقْدِيرُ الْعَزِيزِ الْعَلِيمِ )) فصلت/ 9 - 12 . يخبر الله تعالى أنه سبحانه خلق الأرض في يومين ، ثم (جعل فيها رواسي من فوقها وبارك فيها وقدّر فيها أقواتها) في تمام أربعة أيام ، أي في يومين آخرين ، ثم استغرق خلق السموات السبع يومين ، فكان المجموع ستة أيام من أيام الله . وقوله عز وجل : (ثُمَّ اسْتَوَى إِلَى السَّمَاءِ) أي : قصد إلى خلقها . قال السعدي رحمه الله : " ثُمَّ بعد أن خلق الأرض اسْتَوَى إلى السماء ، أي: قصد إِلَى خلق السَّمَاءِ وَهِيَ دُخَانٌ
Some of these star names are just ridiculous. If I ever discovered a star I would call it something like Keith, just to piss off the Astronomical society
The most massive (heaviest) stars in the universe are not necessarily red. The largest stars in the universe by volume (or radius) are red, but they are not necessarily more massive. In fact, since stars lose mass as they age, the older red supergiants and hypergiants are probably less massive on average than young blue supergiants and hypergiants.
Fr what is considered big in the universe? 🤔 if you think about everything we’ve come across, is nothing compared to the infinite size of the universe. To me there’s no limit of size in space
♦️قال الله سبحانه وتعالى قبل 1441سنة : {{ أو لم ير الذين كفروا أن السماوات والأرض كانتا رتقا ففتقناهما و جعلنا من الماء كل شيء حي أفلا يؤمنون }} الرتق يعني الإندماج والتجمع الإنضغاط والتكتل عكس الرتق الذي هو الإنفجار والتحرر والإنفتاح والإتساع والتباعد.
Be interesting to learn how far away the advance civilization that is probing and observing the earth are away in light year's and probably more than one.
you either tell them all by percentages or you dont, but stick with just one way of saying things, also, the triple digit precision doesnt help anyone, it just makes it harder to listen and understand.
Good spots to colonize for a civilization that could persist billions of years, until the star cools and loses light... but we'd be mining moons and planets at this point in technology so...
Hey John, sorry for that, it was a citation from the original paper but shouldn't have been read like that is true! Thanks for pointing it out & of course for watching :)
Out of interest, one of the proposed great filters of the Fermi Paradox relates to the fact that Red Dwarfs are the dominant stars in our universe. In order for a planet to be in their goldilocks zone they need a much closer orbit which has a couple of unfortunate side effects: (1) The Planet is far more likely to be tidally locked, meaning the same face is always exposed to the sun (known as an Eyeball Planet) This does not mean life can't happen, but it certainly makes it harder: No circadian rhythm born of night/day cycles; Potentially too Hot on one face and perpetual frozen night on the other, with maybe a thin zone favorable to life where the two zones meet. (2) Red Dwarfs appear to be less stable than our G type sun with greater frequency of Solar Flares. Couple that with the Planet being much closer and it seems more likely that there is frequent sterilization of the planets surface, or the atmosphere itself is burnt off entirely.
It is worth noting, however, that for the very same reason a tidally locked world is conventionally thought of as having one side that's scorched dry and one side that's frozen solid, it is possible that tidal locking may extend the effective goldilocks zone by as much as 41%, because the lack of a day/night means that the exposed side receives twice the sunlight it would at that orbital distance if not tidally locked, and since luminosity decays with the inverse square of distance, multiplying the distance by 1.414 will half the insolation received. You would expect some pretty extreme convective winds, though.
Since brown dwarf is not classified as a main sequence, yet is considered a dwarf what are they expected to transform into. Will they just cool and slowly become a super dense object? They do radiate heat and are much more densely constructed than a Jupiter size planet so what is the hypothetical evolutionary path for a brown dwarf ( and yes without spell check half the words in the comment I could not have used so I'm sorry for the rest that are misspelled )
Hi!! So, Unlike main sequence stars, brown dwarfs do not acquire enough mass to trigger sustained nuclear fusion of ordinary hydrogen (1H) into helium in their cores, instead, they slowly contract, cool, and glow in the infrared from the release of gravitational energy, like Jupiter. Eventually, they simply fade away. Some people think of brown dwarfs as failed stars. Although brown dwarfs never truly become stars, some of them are able to act the part, for a short while. To start fusion, the very lowest-mass stars need about 80 times the mass of Jupiter. However, if a brown dwarf has at least 13 times the mass of Jupiter, it can ignite a limited form of fusion. These brown dwarfs fuse a heavy isotope of hydrogen, called deuterium, into helium, releasing energy like a star. Nuclear fusion ends once the supply of deuterium is used up, and that supply is very limited. Once fusion ends, the brown dwarf goes back to contracting, cooling, and glowing. Hope this responds your inquieries! Thanks for asking and watching, keep it Curious ;)
This is the real distance, I believe you have the wrong Andromeda, we said Andromeda constellation, not Galaxy! Think it's a fair mistake! Thanks for watching! :)
Hi William! Have any particular one in mind? We started from the fact that The red dwarf stars are considered the smallest stars known, and representative of the smallest star possible. Yellow dwarfs are stars of medium size. A yellow dwarf is a star belonging to the main sequence of spectral type G and weighing between 0.7 and 1 times the solar mass. Orange dwarfs have masses between 0.5 and 0.8 times the mass of the Sun. So the ones mentioned in the video are even smaller, In anycase if you have one in mind please let us know!
Smallest stars we can currently see/that we know are there, not smallest in the universe. Lol so many of these distances from us are absolutely miniscule
The laws of Physics (as we know them) limit how small a star can be. For example we can call Jupiter a failed Star because it did not have enough mass to achieve fusion. ps. Arthur C. Clarkes Book "2010 The Year We Make Contact" actually speculated about a fictional nano technology that caused Jupiter's Mass to compress in on itself to the point that fusion ignited and a tiny Star called Lucifer was born.
When you say 'minuscule' I have to laugh... A light year is absolutely incomprehensible in human terms as a unit of distance Look how far the Voyagers have got and how long it's taken them As long as we use chemically fueled space travel we're pickled...even if we do get the propulsion sorted I still question whether organic life in general is suited to interstellar travel...
@@penrythajanitor1977 regardless of what "humans are capable of", those distances are still "miniscule". Just on a linear numeric scale, of how far we can see. Absolutely tiny
@@penrythajanitor1977 just the opposite for me. These "numbers" of space are impossible for humans to really comprehend. But this video of a company pretty much lying about the universe actually kind of helped me understand them more. Helped them click into perspective a tad more for me.
Hm, not currently In about 40,000 years, Voyager 2 will pass 1.7 light-years from the star Ross 248, and in about 296,000 years, it will pass 4.3 light-years from the brightest star of the winter night sky - Sirius, the 'Dog Star'. Thanks for asking and for watching! :)
actually none of this is right because neutron stars(stellar remnants) are the smallest stars in the universe some have a diameter of 25km. this video is about the smallest low mass stars in the universe but still the video was informative. :)
Hey Insane Curiosity Squad! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it with your friends or on other social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, TikTok and Twitter, etc... (Since the algorithm is not cooperating in showing us to the public 😅). In just 30 seconds, you will greatly help our Channel to grow and improve future contents. A big thank you from all of us.
Reading out decimal numbers really doesn't work well for comprehension. Having the numbers displayed on screen would be much easier to follow.
Got it, thank you for the useful feedback, it's important for us to know what works better for you!
Thanks for watching!!
This is how astronomy is presented on Wikipedia, with a lot of quantitative data.
This is a great video! but unfortunately I can't really visualise the relative sizes of the stars. If there was a simple diagram showing the star compared to our own sun, that would be a fantastic addition! Keep up the great work - these are fascinating!
Thank you love the information and the way to describe it 💕
Glad you enjoyed! Thank you for watching :)
♦️قال الله تعالى في قصة سليمان مع ملكة سبأ قبل 1441سنة :
( ( قَالَ يَا أَيُّهَا الْمَلَأُ أَيُّكُمْ يَأْتِينِي بِعَرْشِهَا قَبْلَ أَنْ يَأْتُونِي مُسْلِمِينَ * قَالَ عِفْرِيتٌ مِنَ الْجِنِّ أَنَا آتِيكَ بِهِ قَبْلَ أَنْ تَقُومَ مِنْ مَقَامِكَ وَإِنِّي عَلَيْهِ لَقَوِيٌّ أَمِينٌ * قَالَ الَّذِي عِنْدَهُ (عِلْمٌ مِنَ الْكِتَابِ) أَنَا آتِيكَ بِهِ قَبْلَ أَنْ يَرْتَدَّ إِلَيْكَ طَرْفُكَ فَلَمَّا رَآهُ مُسْتَقِرًّا عِنْدَهُ قَالَ هَذَا مِنْ فَضْلِ رَبِّي لِيَبْلُوَنِي أَأَشْكُرُ أَمْ أَكْفُرُ وَمَنْ شَكَرَ فَإِنَّمَا يَشْكُرُ لِنَفْسِهِ وَمَنْ كَفَرَ فَإِنَّ رَبِّي غَنِيٌّ كَرِيمٌ ))
النمل/38- 40 .
وأنا أقول لكم يا علماء الفلك والفيزياء والكيمياء والرياضيات وجميع علوم الأرض والبحار والفضاء ووو
♦️ أقول لكم أنكم ضعفاء ولا تعلمون إلا الشيء القليل جدا ويكاد يكون صفرا 0 وإني لا أبالغ بحديثي هذا، وإني أخاطبكم وأدعوكم إلى تأمل وتدبر الآية من 38-40 من سورة النمل في عهد النبي الملك سليمان يقوم رجل عنده علم من الكتاب بإحضار عرش الملكة بلقيس من اليمن وحتى القدس الشريف بلمح البصر وبطرفة عين، وأنتم تعرفون المسافة بين اليمن والقدس ،عرش عظيم وثقيل ينقل بسرعة البرق وفي لحظة يستقر أمام النبي سليمان، منذ آلاف السنين
فأين علمكم وتطور أبحاتكم يا علماء الدنيا مما سبق ذكره والله إن الإنسان لضعيف إلا من كان مع الله،
عندما أقارن بين علم رجل عاش منذ آلاف السنين في عهد سليمان عليه السلام
والذي نقل عرشا عظيما للملكة بلقيس من اليمن إلى القدس بلمح البصر، أقارنه بعلومكم أستنتج أنكم وعلومكم ضعفاء وتافهون.وشكرا
•{وما أوتيتم من العلم إلا قليلا }•
♦️يقول الله عز وجل قبل 1441سنة :
((قُلْ أَئِنَّكُمْ لَتَكْفُرُونَ بِالَّذِي خَلَقَ الْأَرْضَ فِي يَوْمَيْنِ وَتَجْعَلُونَ لَهُ أَنْدَادًا ذَلِكَ رَبُّ الْعَالَمِينَ * وَجَعَلَ فِيهَا رَوَاسِيَ مِنْ فَوْقِهَا وَبَارَكَ فِيهَا وَقَدَّرَ فِيهَا أَقْوَاتَهَا فِي أَرْبَعَةِ أَيَّامٍ سَوَاءً لِلسَّائِلِينَ * ثُمَّ اسْتَوَى إِلَى السَّمَاءِ وَهِيَ دُخَانٌ فَقَالَ لَهَا وَلِلْأَرْضِ ائْتِيَا طَوْعًا أَوْ كَرْهًا قَالَتَا أَتَيْنَا طَائِعِينَ * فَقَضَاهُنَّ سَبْعَ سَمَاوَاتٍ فِي يَوْمَيْنِ وَأَوْحَى فِي كُلِّ سَمَاءٍ أَمْرَهَا وَزَيَّنَّا السَّمَاءَ الدُّنْيَا بِمَصَابِيحَ وَحِفْظًا ذَلِكَ تَقْدِيرُ الْعَزِيزِ الْعَلِيمِ )) فصلت/ 9 - 12 .
يخبر الله تعالى أنه سبحانه خلق الأرض في يومين ، ثم (جعل فيها رواسي من فوقها وبارك فيها وقدّر فيها أقواتها) في تمام أربعة أيام ، أي في يومين آخرين ، ثم استغرق خلق السموات السبع يومين ، فكان المجموع ستة أيام من أيام الله .
وقوله عز وجل : (ثُمَّ اسْتَوَى إِلَى السَّمَاءِ)
أي : قصد إلى خلقها .
قال السعدي رحمه الله :
" ثُمَّ بعد أن خلق الأرض اسْتَوَى إلى السماء ، أي: قصد إِلَى خلق السَّمَاءِ وَهِيَ دُخَانٌ
Awesome view!! Very good content info
Glad you enjoyed Gary! Thanks for watching ;)
If I ever discover a tiny star it's gonna be called MicroFart-Blaster-AH79-G2003
Okay...
@@insanecuriosity2682 - Oh it's just a joke. I love this channel. I'm a huge astronomy buff :)
Wasn't Wolf 359 where the Borg and federation had a "slight" disagreement?😎😎
It was, yeah they did have a small argument. I think someone ate the other ones sandwich from the fridge or something
@@kennybevan11 ha ha 😄 🤣
Haha! Thanks for watching guys!
@@insanecuriosity2682 always a pleasure to watch your content.
Yes,yes it was 😎
Any other star trek fans' ears perk at Wolf 359?
♦️قال الله سبحانه وتعالى قبل 1441سنة :
•{ والسماء بنيناها بأيد وإنا لموسعون }•
I believe that Jupiter was a failed star
Universe or galaxy? We know nothing about the stars in other galaxies!!!
What we call universe is limited to how far our telescope can reach. The suns are part of the universe so technically he is right.
@@lombardo141 That's right! Thanks for the input and for watching :D
Matter of perspective!
Thanks for sharing yours with us, it is also true!
Did you enjoy the video?
Wow I’m seeing stars ✨
Cool that's the idea!
Don't stop being Curious and thanks for watching :)
@@insanecuriosity2682 he's seeing stars from all the babbling numbers your throwing out....jeez
Awesome vid, I want more of this in the channel
You'll get it! :)
Thanks for watching!
@@insanecuriosity2682 THANK YOU, keep going with the work
Some of these star names are just ridiculous. If I ever discovered a star I would call it something like Keith, just to piss off the Astronomical society
Well at least the Trappist system is named after a Belgian order of Monks who are also famous for the beer they are brewing.
Hope you do ;) Thanks for watching!
@@insanecuriosity2682 keep making the great content
Amazing 👏🙀😮
Approved for 10k.
Great information !
The most massive (heaviest) stars in the universe are not necessarily red. The largest stars in the universe by volume (or radius) are red, but they are not necessarily more massive. In fact, since stars lose mass as they age, the older red supergiants and hypergiants are probably less massive on average than young blue supergiants and hypergiants.
Fr what is considered big in the universe? 🤔 if you think about everything we’ve come across, is nothing compared to the infinite size of the universe. To me there’s no limit of size in space
Good point!
Thanks for watching ;)!
man 2
stars smaller than jupiter
Amazing 🙌👌😆
♦️قال الله سبحانه وتعالى قبل 1441سنة :
{{ أو لم ير الذين كفروا أن السماوات والأرض كانتا رتقا ففتقناهما و جعلنا من الماء كل شيء حي أفلا يؤمنون }}
الرتق يعني الإندماج والتجمع الإنضغاط والتكتل عكس
الرتق الذي هو الإنفجار والتحرر والإنفتاح والإتساع والتباعد.
This made me wonder if it’s possible to “make” a star. I wonder what that would talk since we know how stars form
👍 information
A parsec is a volume not distance.
Be interesting to learn how far away the advance civilization that is probing and observing the earth are away in light year's and probably more than one.
Definitely interesting, space knowledge is endless!!
Thanks for watching and sharing this passion with us :)
you either tell them all by percentages or you dont, but stick with just one way of saying things, also, the triple digit precision doesnt help anyone, it just makes it harder to listen and understand.
Hi Andrei!
Noted! Thanks for the useful feedback, it's our best way to improve :)
Good spots to colonize for a civilization that could persist billions of years, until the star cools and loses light... but we'd be mining moons and planets at this point in technology so...
Does anyone else hear the nearly inaudible whispering? I heard it a few times but can't make it out
Hm, not quite!
That's a good sense of hearing!
Lithium 33? What in the world is that?
Hey John, sorry for that, it was a citation from the original paper but shouldn't have been read like that is true!
Thanks for pointing it out & of course for watching :)
Out of interest, one of the proposed great filters of the Fermi Paradox relates to the fact that Red Dwarfs are the dominant stars in our universe. In order for a planet to be in their goldilocks zone they need a much closer orbit which has a couple of unfortunate side effects: (1) The Planet is far more likely to be tidally locked, meaning the same face is always exposed to the sun (known as an Eyeball Planet) This does not mean life can't happen, but it certainly makes it harder: No circadian rhythm born of night/day cycles; Potentially too Hot on one face and perpetual frozen night on the other, with maybe a thin zone favorable to life where the two zones meet. (2) Red Dwarfs appear to be less stable than our G type sun with greater frequency of Solar Flares. Couple that with the Planet being much closer and it seems more likely that there is frequent sterilization of the planets surface, or the atmosphere itself is burnt off entirely.
Intersting facts!
Thanks for sharing with us!
K stars are more common than G stars and are still likely to have habitable planets without tidal locking.
It is worth noting, however, that for the very same reason a tidally locked world is conventionally thought of as having one side that's scorched dry and one side that's frozen solid, it is possible that tidal locking may extend the effective goldilocks zone by as much as 41%, because the lack of a day/night means that the exposed side receives twice the sunlight it would at that orbital distance if not tidally locked, and since luminosity decays with the inverse square of distance, multiplying the distance by 1.414 will half the insolation received.
You would expect some pretty extreme convective winds, though.
Neutron stars are small because they are the cores of dead stars
Since brown dwarf is not classified as a main sequence, yet is considered a dwarf what are they expected to transform into. Will they just cool and slowly become a super dense object? They do radiate heat and are much more densely constructed than a Jupiter size planet so what is the hypothetical evolutionary path for a brown dwarf ( and yes without spell check half the words in the comment I could not have used so I'm sorry for the rest that are misspelled )
Hi!!
So, Unlike main sequence stars, brown dwarfs do not acquire enough mass to trigger sustained nuclear fusion of ordinary hydrogen (1H) into helium in their cores, instead, they slowly contract, cool, and glow in the infrared from the release of gravitational energy, like Jupiter. Eventually, they simply fade away. Some people think of brown dwarfs as failed stars.
Although brown dwarfs never truly become stars, some of them are able to act the part, for a short while. To start fusion, the very lowest-mass stars need about 80 times the mass of Jupiter. However, if a brown dwarf has at least 13 times the mass of Jupiter, it can ignite a limited form of fusion.
These brown dwarfs fuse a heavy isotope of hydrogen, called deuterium, into helium, releasing energy like a star. Nuclear fusion ends once the supply of deuterium is used up, and that supply is very limited.
Once fusion ends, the brown dwarf goes back to contracting, cooling, and glowing.
Hope this responds your inquieries! Thanks for asking and watching, keep it Curious ;)
@@insanecuriosity2682 thank you for your response.
@@jssomewhere6740 Sure thing! :)
Don't goto Wolf-359 or you'll be assimilated!
How come Ross 248 is 10 light years away and present in Andromeda galaxy? 😂😂
This is the real distance, I believe you have the wrong Andromeda, we said Andromeda constellation, not Galaxy!
Think it's a fair mistake!
Thanks for watching! :)
The video was 0.10304040 more interesting by 0.330101 than a 0.2111001 Newton poke in the eye.
Stars can last for 4 trillion years? Or was that billion?
What about the closets yellow and orange drawf stars closetes to Earth's sun??
Hi William!
Have any particular one in mind? We started from the fact that The red dwarf stars are considered the smallest stars known, and representative of the smallest star possible.
Yellow dwarfs are stars of medium size. A yellow dwarf is a star belonging to the main sequence of spectral type G and weighing between 0.7 and 1 times the solar mass.
Orange dwarfs have masses between 0.5 and 0.8 times the mass of the Sun.
So the ones mentioned in the video are even smaller,
In anycase if you have one in mind please let us know!
I just wondering how many yellow and orange drawf stars where closest to Earth's sun.
Wow now that’s too small
Right?!
Thanks for watching and stopping by!
Your throwing out waaaay to many numbers its ridiculous
Numbers ar facts indeed!
Thanks for the feedback ;)
Smallest stars we can currently see/that we know are there, not smallest in the universe. Lol so many of these distances from us are absolutely miniscule
The laws of Physics (as we know them) limit how small a star can be. For example we can call Jupiter a failed Star because it did not have enough mass to achieve fusion. ps. Arthur C. Clarkes Book "2010 The Year We Make Contact" actually speculated about a fictional nano technology that caused Jupiter's Mass to compress in on itself to the point that fusion ignited and a tiny Star called Lucifer was born.
When you say 'minuscule' I have to laugh...
A light year is absolutely incomprehensible in human terms as a unit of distance
Look how far the Voyagers have got and how long it's taken them
As long as we use chemically fueled space travel we're pickled...even if we do get the propulsion sorted I still question whether organic life in general is suited to interstellar travel...
@@penrythajanitor1977 regardless of what "humans are capable of", those distances are still "miniscule". Just on a linear numeric scale, of how far we can see. Absolutely tiny
@@jonathanseibert8832 scary ain't it?
@@penrythajanitor1977 just the opposite for me. These "numbers" of space are impossible for humans to really comprehend. But this video of a company pretty much lying about the universe actually kind of helped me understand them more. Helped them click into perspective a tad more for me.
Isn't one of the voyagers headed towards Ross 248?
Hm, not currently
In about 40,000 years, Voyager 2 will pass 1.7 light-years from the star Ross 248, and in about 296,000 years, it will pass 4.3 light-years from the brightest star of the winter night sky - Sirius, the 'Dog Star'.
Thanks for asking and for watching! :)
@@insanecuriosity2682 yeah that's what I meant. Not like it'll be there tomorrow, but it's generally headed that way
Hello again
Hello!
HI!!
4:10 Constelation Obofiukas?
Its not the smallest star in the universe until now.....so it is the smallest
Okidoc!
Thanks for watching :)
actually none of this is right because neutron stars(stellar remnants) are the smallest stars in the universe some have a diameter of 25km.
this video is about the smallest low mass stars in the universe
but still the video was informative.
:)
Guess depends from the perspective you see it ;)
Thanks for watching!!
Way to many numbers thrown at me to follow, a few visual numbers would help with the mind boggling sizes of the shit in space
Welcome to space.
Noted, thanks for the feedback!
Stay tuned ;)
We can move theses stars if we would just work together to bad we are burning our home to the ground your welcome kids smh
Universe? I dont think thats correct.. sourses plz
999nth like!
Boooooooring. God, that couldn't of been put together any worse. It just didn't CLICK with me.