We wish Mr. Jaggi to read the comments here. All universe trust and see krishna in its own nature that is his dignified playfulness, Divinity in its own ways, WORTHY for his own meaningful purposes - its all destined and designed in that way. Just because we HUMAN beings needs such enlightenment and SELF awareness including Sri. Jaggi doesn't mean Krishna's life the same. From birth to death he lived purposefully thats his message to each of us. Human if tries to think same as him - that moment its him or her the fool. NOT KRISHNA. That's Krishna's unique QUALITY inherently Divine reflected outside as his birth purpose. In 2024 if we stand for Krishna because of his divine nature. NOT any HUMAN forms deserves that quality standards too 🙏🏾💝
Absolutely right... I don't know why Sadhguru says wrong about Krishna....if sadguru is enlightened then he can't see Krishna properly....may be yogi needs bhakti....krishna himself said i am beyond reach of yogis...i manisfest only to bhakt with prem
Title says it all. In Bhagavad Gita Lord Krishna proves Himself to be Paramishvara. Lord Bhraman in the Bhraman Samhita is declared as Govinda “ Adi Purusha” He is eternally the source of Enlightenment to say he becomes enlightened is misleading. Hare Krishna.
@aeroanil No problem bro It happens .why are you so much disturbed. Just say that you don't know instead of saying all this. And I am not asking because I don't know I am asking because I want you to realise that you don't know. And If I am copying Sadhguru then please you copy Krishna atleast you know something about him . If you really read bhagwat gita you won't talk with such ego. You proved that you definitely don't know Krishna . You think by reading one book you become Krishna or maybe above him. If only reading gita would make people enlightened. Then we have a whole world enlightened by now but when people read gita they become more egoistic like you not humble . Knowledge should make people more gentle more loving but it looks like it makes you more arrogant. Krishna does not come out of gita but rather gita comes out of Krishna so a book can not make you enlightened rather an enlightened being makes a book . I want you to realise that you still do not know . Now you are recommending me to read it and become egoistic. What kind of gita are you reading which makes you egoistic and arrogant . If you really got the essence of gita or if you see Krishna's life then definitely you got some sense because he was a loving one not an arrogant one . And about copying someone If you see every enlightened being Gautama buddha , Mahavir , Jesus, osho ,Adiyogi , Krishna and Sadhguru would talk same language that doesn't mean they are copying each other it simply means they are talking about same thing , they are talking about enlightenment . If you think copying somebody is a insult to knowledge. Then why are you recommending gita that is also a copy of Krishna .
Let me tell what it is actually, after krishna said he want to marry radha yashoda denies and says she is not perfect match for you by giving lot of reasons. Krishna answers and give reasons why he wants to marry, and she reports nandha even nanda fails to win over krishna and he report it to gargacharya. Gargacharya tries very hard to convince krishna but even he fails. Krishna at very early age gives very logical, philosophical and strong answers in very respectful way. He has lot of respect towards his elders. After few weeks he has to leave vrindavan he marries radha. It was instant marriage happens in front of gargacharya. I respect you Sadhguru, krishna enlightenment has story but not linked with how you narrated. May be it's your way of understanding krishna and your version of story.
From where exactly Sadhguru knows anything about Krishna since he said that he doesn't believe in scriptures? How on earth he speaks such nonsense completely ignoring Srimad Bhagavatam and The Bhagavad Gita? Krishna and Krishna's pure devotees has spoken enough. World doesn't need more cheaters such as Sadhguru.
![Megan Thee Stallion - Bigger In Texas [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QxTkZTLWdo4/mqdefault.jpg)
Jagdish vasudev ji is telling his experience about enlightenment in the name of Krishna's
Lord Shrikrishna himself is a God.
He doesn't require enlightenment..
Sadhguru thinks he is same as Krishna 😂😂😂
Beautiful made this video! 🙏❤️ Jay Sri Krsna!
Glad you liked it🙏🙏🙏
I think sadguru is more enlightened coz he knows even how krishna was enlightened...😂😂
We wish Mr. Jaggi to read the comments here. All universe trust and see krishna in its own nature that is his dignified playfulness, Divinity in its own ways, WORTHY for his own meaningful purposes - its all destined and designed in that way. Just because we HUMAN beings needs such enlightenment and SELF awareness including Sri. Jaggi doesn't mean Krishna's life the same.
From birth to death he lived purposefully thats his message to each of us. Human if tries to think same as him - that moment its him or her the fool. NOT KRISHNA. That's Krishna's unique QUALITY inherently Divine reflected outside as his birth purpose.
In 2024 if we stand for Krishna because of his divine nature. NOT any HUMAN forms deserves that quality standards too 🙏🏾💝
Krishna doesnt need to get enlightened as he appeared on Earth as a fully enlightened being. He is fully aware of his divinity right from his birth
🙏
Absolutely right... I don't know why Sadhguru says wrong about Krishna....if sadguru is enlightened then he can't see Krishna properly....may be yogi needs bhakti....krishna himself said i am beyond reach of yogis...i manisfest only to bhakt with prem
Even sandipani guru of krishna realized lately that who is krishna n sadguru still stuck at cowboy😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Sadhguru is thinking he is same as Krishna 😂😂😂
no , he had guru and was a normal person at birth .
Beautiful story 💕 🙏
🙏
Thank you❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Why do people dont get essence and fight about the story 😅
Thank you❤
🙏
Title says it all. In Bhagavad Gita Lord Krishna proves Himself to be Paramishvara. Lord Bhraman in the Bhraman Samhita is declared as Govinda “ Adi Purusha”
He is eternally the source of Enlightenment to say he becomes enlightened is misleading.
Hare Krishna.
@aeroanil
No problem bro
It happens .why are you so much disturbed.
Just say that you don't know instead of saying all this.
And I am not asking because I don't know I am asking because I want you to realise that you don't know.
And If I am copying Sadhguru then please you copy Krishna atleast you know something about him .
If you really read bhagwat gita you won't talk with such ego.
You proved that you definitely don't know Krishna .
You think by reading one book you become Krishna or maybe above him.
If only reading gita would make people enlightened.
Then we have a whole world enlightened by now but when people read gita they become more egoistic like you not humble .
Knowledge should make people more gentle more loving but it looks like it makes you more arrogant.
Krishna does not come out of gita but rather gita comes out of Krishna so a book can not make you enlightened rather an enlightened being makes a book .
I want you to realise that you still do not know .
Now you are recommending me to read it and become egoistic.
What kind of gita are you reading which makes you egoistic and arrogant .
If you really got the essence of gita or if you see Krishna's life then definitely you got some sense because he was a loving one not an arrogant one .
And about copying someone
If you see every enlightened being Gautama buddha , Mahavir , Jesus, osho ,Adiyogi , Krishna and Sadhguru would talk same language that doesn't mean they are copying each other it simply means they are talking about same thing , they are talking about enlightenment .
If you think copying somebody is a insult to knowledge.
Then why are you recommending gita that is also a copy of Krishna .
Let me tell what it is actually, after krishna said he want to marry radha yashoda denies and says she is not perfect match for you by giving lot of reasons. Krishna answers and give reasons why he wants to marry, and she reports nandha even nanda fails to win over krishna and he report it to gargacharya. Gargacharya tries very hard to convince krishna but even he fails. Krishna at very early age gives very logical, philosophical and strong answers in very respectful way. He has lot of respect towards his elders. After few weeks he has to leave vrindavan he marries radha. It was instant marriage happens in front of gargacharya.
I respect you Sadhguru, krishna enlightenment has story but not linked with how you narrated. May be it's your way of understanding krishna and your version of story.
Happy navatri! 💕
What Happened to radhe after he left her.
But Sadhguru says he never read any scripture. So how the heck would he know any of it? Did he learn from other gurus?
Where did this story come from i am not trying to argue just curious
🙏
🙏
💕 🙏
🙏
🙏❤️❤️❤️🙏
🙏🙏🙏
I humbly request Sadhguru to read srimad bhagawatham and the books written by great acharyas like my Gurudev Bhaktivedanta Narayana Goswami maharaj
You watch "Leela" program, you mesmerise
But why
@@holyhelper7400 to be able convey indepth information on Ksna's janma. This is important for people to understand fully our dharma
Sadghuru is fully realized 😂😂😂 you fool reading is for the mind
@@JuanGarcia-zy8yw Sadhguru is not a realized master. Sorry to say this, but he is just a cunning business man.
KRSNA is not an avatar, he is the avatari
Kuch Bhi…..😂😂😂 Jaggi, Kya yar..
From where exactly Sadhguru knows anything about Krishna since he said that he doesn't believe in scriptures? How on earth he speaks such nonsense completely ignoring Srimad Bhagavatam and The Bhagavad Gita? Krishna and Krishna's pure devotees has spoken enough. World doesn't need more cheaters such as Sadhguru.
exactly this I also wrote!