This woman isn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer. The tractors were disabled. She had to have that explained? Oh and it’s not Nato, it’s N.A.T.O or have your standards dropped that low?
her job is to play devils advocate... that is how journalism has been done for more then 50 years in the UK... when interviewing a person you always take the perspective of the opposition perspective to force the interviewee to answer the hard questions. It just so happens that taking the opposition perspective on this is kind of hard and makes you look like an idiot :D
@@ralphzimmermann Yes, but with a minimum of common sense or basic technical competency, as a starting point, for a broadsheet. Sure journalists have to play the devil's advocate, but tabloid-like statements like "this is all racist and fear-mongering...." doesn't enlighten anyone. This journalist appears to be one of the majority in the UK (as we discovered during the pandemic), who left behind even rudimentary competency at O-Level/GCSE (the last apparent time they cracked a book or publication on a technical subject).
The interviewer seems perplexed as to why disabling tractors in Ukraine would be a problem and incredulous that China would stop cars in the street and why that would also be a problem. Is lack of thinking a problem for her or is she trying to be the average person on the street?
Let's hope to goodness she does not represent the average person's thinking on the street. A very poorly led discussion on what should have been an interesting topic.
The interviewer comes across as somewhat unintelligent and obnoxious. Does the man need to spell it out any further what the example of remotely disabling the John Deere tractors mean? And she even managed to bring up it being "racist" to not buying the risky Chinese products. What a menace and annoying "journalist". *Jeez...*
John Deere is an American company known for ripping off their customers by denying them the right to repair. It's a shady company that's disliked by farmers. It's not as if their tractors are popular all over the world
How is his example 'racist' and 'fearmongering'? The presenter has no idea about the state of international affairs. Sir Dearlove is spot on in this interview.
I think she has...she reacts on behalf of the political and ecomical people with blindfolds who go to China to get impressed by the machines and the prices and come back all brainwashed...
This guy could’ve answered a lot of interesting questions if he hadn’t had to explain the very simplest of details to a woman who clearly isn’t qualified enough to interview him.
You would have thought that Times Radio of all media organisations would have had the decency to refer to a Knight of the Realm as ‘Sir Richard’ rather than ‘Mr Dearlove’
Our society is constantly in trouble because we’re always the scratch after the itch. Instead of creating a life that satisfies people so they want for little, we sit around and fix the trouble when it comes, most of the time unsatisfactorily. Someone is always promising a cheaper, tastier, sexier, easier alternative to win us over to the dark side against our better selves.
Just listened to this interview. It has made me proud to be English British. Seriously worrying topic discussed without any swearing or insults. The ex mi6 officer not being afraid to tell the absolute truth as he sees it without the fear of favours. Thank you very much.
Its not just cars that can be disabled remotely, virtually anything electrical we buy now is open to interference..Tv's, Washing machines, Refrigerators and so on and it will become more prevalent
Reduce emissions eh? I suggest that you do the research into the entire lifecycle from mining of the raw materials, build and operate, of these units and also the issue of battery recycling. We have not even looked at the emissions from the electricity for charging.
Chinese cars have cameras front nose in the mirrors acting like mirrors and back bumpers and ai inside the operating system. So yea they can track you even inside the car and listen .John Mcafee told long time ago that mobiles are the greatest spies.
I wouldn't touch one with a barge pole, including "smartphones" (or whatever they are!), since it's nobody's business what I'm doing, nor where I am! All of those things can follow us, for goodness sake!
Either way if you exchange price for trust you make yourself vulnerable. No nation should make itself dependent and should always have an alternative back up plan.
Yeah, we're going to reintroduce the horse and cart. Inexpensive transport that can be shared by family and friends and the byproduct we can chuck on the garden for compost. Win, win situation 👍.
@geofo60 Funny, but technology products are capable of sharing our data without our knowledge and consent. Smartphones sharing with big tech platforms might seem just a personal privacy issue. Google: Do no evil policy was their attempt to be seen as ethical. CCP has no such ethical objectives, quite the reverse. Every chinese enterprise has a CCP 'golden share' so is really controlled by the regime that doesn't respect fair trade, the international rule of law, intellectual property and human rights. The only vote we have with the CCP dictatorship is not to buy their supposedly cheap products which in reality is an exchange of sovereign capabilities and so a loss of freedom. A very bad bargain and something not priced into the deal at all, which allows the globalist to trade away our freedom without any accounting of that. AI requires big data to train the models so where our data goes is a national security issue concerning foreign powers with hostile objectives. Wake up and smell the coffee.
recently in the Philippines, they stopped combustion engine Toyota but with long range LIDAR device embedded in windshield, chinese tech guy and filipino 2 drivers mapping entries to naval ports, airports and military sites (filipino and usa) ... and last week BYD chinese ev maker released largest car carrier ship, 9800 cars onboard ... connect the dots
Before China disabled their cars remotely, I really think Elon Musk and Trump would be first to do it with Tesla and comfortable to do it to his allies who doesn’t pay his 25% tariff or if a nation voted for a left party.
The delegates to China feel very honored and accept all the compliments from the East. Our leaders stand far from normal life! That is where the whole western world has gone wrong since the cold war started.
Bizarrely, I'm listening to an audiobook from years back that depicts just this and attempted assassination via car, albeit done by rogue elements in Japan. Happens a lot recently, Mr Putin seems to have the same taste in fiction as I do, which is worrying.
So, MI6 are concerned about Chinese cars on our roads but happy to serve the Westminster folk? I know who i fear more about standards in public life and the erosion of our civil liberties.
Disabling vehicles is the least of our worries. Firstly, today almost all cars get OTA updates, and that includes ICE engines as well for their multimedia systems, so you need to separate the drivetrain from the security threat. Chinese cars are rolling intelligence gathering platforms that are always online, and are equipped with cameras, LIDAR, microphones, GPS and an increasing degree of autonomy. This means that your "safety features" such as lane keeping assist could easily be subverted to drive you off a cliff if they decide to silence you. Here in Israel, most men serve in the army reserves. In most military bases, when you report for duty, they won't let you park a Chinese EV in the base car park. You need to park it outside and leg it to the base. This includes Teslas, since many of them are now made in China as well.
Notable that Tesla CEO never says anything CCP critical since they support and staff the majority of his production. Huge conflict of interest with USA government and national security!
Security cameras and cars are a danger. The density of private security cameras makes it possible to follow a person every step of his way in urban areas. Cars could gather information about the people on board (who of course are already identified). Heart rate, bloodpressure, and saturation levels (that could also be controlled remotely over the car’s air conditioning), everything. In a conflict, meddling with the car’s navigation is optional: you are kindly informed of an accident that has occurred ahead and advised to take a detour. Organize 10 such cases in sync, and have them apear on a vital point in the road system, where you disable them. For those that think all of this is far-fetched: Modern warfare more so than at any time in the past resembles natural evolution greatly sped up. We must be prepared for what might lie ahead. Thank you for having this guest.
His analysis is lacking a technical understanding of EV and Internet systems, these same risks were already taken by the Tories but was he decrying them?
Yes, he was. Not a party political issue. Politicians generally have liberal arts or history education not STEM so are ignorant yet not self aware enough to ask for help and pay attention.
People don’t think about the consequences of buying a Chinese EV. I am pleased you brought this up. People should buy the electric cars made in the west, to support our own economy not that of China anyway.!
The UK Government have already funded the purchase of Chinese EV busses for use in the UK. Yutong have orders for another 500+ busses for 2025 delivery at £400k each. The technology is scary and yes I agree they can be remotely disabled. Yutong is a huge Chinese company producing 400+ busses a day!
Data collection and transfer is a foreseeable element of service and sustainment of any public service vehicle. So that should have been addressed in the vehicle type approval before they enter service. DVLA.gov.uk
The internet protocol supports "multicasting" which allows multiple subscribers to "Tune In" to a specific stream of traffic (such as with IP TV) So tall cars / models from a specific vendor could/will be subscribed to a specific multicast "channel". That is up to the manufacturer to implement and will be completely up them, so in a doomsday scenario all vehicles from a manufacturer could be stunned at the same time with one command. I only buy European cars, although that can go wrong with over-the air updates.
concerned about ‘security’ 😂 now tell us all about what ‘Elbit Systems’ are up to. tHE tiMEs own best presstitutes can’t even read names out correctly.
A very poor interview, it was played for laughs, like something on a lightweight music radio show. This man has expertise and should have been given more chance to express it. Her job *is* to challenge the interviewee (unlike the US where they grovel), but unfortunately she really didn't seem to understand or believe his concerns. She seems to think "Why would they be interested in my little car?" The issue is that they could do things like monitoring activity as a whole and could bringing transport to a halt by switching them all off and blocking the roads.
It's a bit late to worry about privacy and Chinese technology. After all, I expect the vast majority of us are watching this video on either a smartphone or a laptop manufactured in China. If China can shut down our cars, they can equally shut down pretty much all of our communications. As for EV range. My God, what dinosaurs. We live in the UK, a small island. My Tesla standard range (not even a long range) happily drives me hundreds of miles in a day on a family trip with easy and very fast charging available when I need a rest break. Another point, if China were to take such dire action in a time of conflict, I expect we can do equally nasty things to them. Any future conflict with China will almost certainly involve the US. The US navy could quite easily stop all oil supply to China from the Middle East, and the Chinese navy, large as it is, could do nothing about it. How long would China last with their oil supply cut off?
No, it's very similar abuse of power. Every chinese enterprise has a CCP 'golden share' so is really controlled by the regime that doesn't respect fair trade, the international rule of law, intellectual property and human rights. The only vote we have with the CCP dictatorship is not to buy their supposedly cheap products which in reality is an exchange of sovereign capabilities and so a loss of freedom. A very bad bargain and something not priced into the deal at all, which allows the globalist to trade away our freedom without any accounting of that. You will never truly own an EV as your data is shared
I'm sorry not everyone is a rich as you. What is it with middle classes you never think about working class. Its all luxury beliefs at the expense of the poor
The opening 2 minutes of this slagging EVs is just plain pathetic. I have an EV and drove nearly 2000km across Australia over 2 days. It did wonders for "range anxiety". I have much more confidence in the car. I drive about 20,000km a year, sometimes more. I charge off sunshine on my solar panels. All well and good that you don't want an EV but I'd rather hear about NATO, and Russia's unprovoked war against Ukraine. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 🇦🇺
He clearly said that he wasn't against EV just the risk of data collection by a foreign power that is hostile. Australian government and forces, responsible for national security, agree. Hopefully your journeys are not shared with a foreign power...
Do catch up Britain. Australia was ahead of you in understanding from its intelligence the Huawei threat but it hasn’t any qualms about Chinese electric vehicles, because there isn’t one.
Chinese have infiltrated all the big universities in Australia. The dean of the university in Sydney was actually selected by Chinese as they have the most students in the university they’re not Australian! I don’t know if you knew this.
No surprise .Any electric car is nothing more then a oversized laptop battery with 4 wheels attached to it. Plus a roofing and some entertainment gadget so that your wife doesn't get bored on the road
@ Nope, the point is that Australian systems intelligence surpassed Britain’s long ago, and if it’s vetted Chinese vehicles, then that’s all the security check that’s needed.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
It baffles me people are like children in need of being educated in something that has been so patently obvious to those paying attention.
The amount of intellectual property stolen over the years is staggering
Why do the host seem like this is the first time they are hearing this.
I don't doubt that many in government share the views.
She doesn't understand how modern cars work, or what might happen in the case of a global conflict.
Staggering that she is naive.
I don’t know who this woman interviewer is so I don’t know her style, but is she really that obtuse?
cackling knitting circle
Its a journalist’s job to interrogate the interviewee’s ideas…
I don't think she is, more likely she's probing the guest to explain it in the simplest terms for the obtuse people who might be watching.
This woman isn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer. The tractors were disabled. She had to have that explained? Oh and it’s not Nato, it’s N.A.T.O or have your standards dropped that low?
her job is to play devils advocate... that is how journalism has been done for more then 50 years in the UK... when interviewing a person you always take the perspective of the opposition perspective to force the interviewee to answer the hard questions. It just so happens that taking the opposition perspective on this is kind of hard and makes you look like an idiot :D
@@ralphzimmermann Yes, but with a minimum of common sense or basic technical competency, as a starting point, for a broadsheet. Sure journalists have to play the devil's advocate, but tabloid-like statements like "this is all racist and fear-mongering...." doesn't enlighten anyone. This journalist appears to be one of the majority in the UK (as we discovered during the pandemic), who left behind even rudimentary competency at O-Level/GCSE (the last apparent time they cracked a book or publication on a technical subject).
which side is this woman on?
China's
The interviewers seem pretty dense, Its a shame because Dearlove is very smart and it could have been an interesting podcast
The interviewer seems perplexed as to why disabling tractors in Ukraine would be a problem and incredulous that China would stop cars in the street and why that would also be a problem. Is lack of thinking a problem for her or is she trying to be the average person on the street?
Ukraine is an ally and John Deere should not have disabled the tractors. Even in America their reputation is almost destroyed. Buyer beware.
Average person on the street.
Let's hope to goodness she does not represent the average person's thinking on the street.
A very poorly led discussion on what should have been an interesting topic.
Agreed: More suited for Mary Berry on muffin recipes , not a former "C" of SIS on a technical topic.
Lack of thinking is not a problem for her. She is just explaining the problem FOR the average person on the street.
Great guest. Maybe the interviewer could be a little less flippant and puerile.
The interviewer comes across as somewhat unintelligent and obnoxious. Does the man need to spell it out any further what the example of remotely disabling the John Deere tractors mean? And she even managed to bring up it being "racist" to not buying the risky Chinese products. What a menace and annoying "journalist". *Jeez...*
John Deere is an American company known for ripping off their customers by denying them the right to repair. It's a shady company that's disliked by farmers. It's not as if their tractors are popular all over the world
Russia would never try to blackmail Europe with the gas supply and accordingly harm its costumer base 🤡🙄
This has to be the most ignorant interviewer I’ve ever listened to.
How is his example 'racist' and 'fearmongering'? The presenter has no idea about the state of international affairs. Sir Dearlove is spot on in this interview.
I think she has...she reacts on behalf of the political and ecomical people with blindfolds who go to China to get impressed by the machines and the prices and come back all brainwashed...
This guy could’ve answered a lot of interesting questions if he hadn’t had to explain the very simplest of details to a woman who clearly isn’t qualified enough to interview him.
Smart Meters...same issue...are controlled by the energy suppliers
Correct, that was the plan all along.
I’m not surprised
You would have thought that Times Radio of all media organisations would have had the decency to refer to a Knight of the Realm as ‘Sir Richard’ rather than ‘Mr Dearlove’
Yes, what is the point of using a polite title (Mr.) if it's the wrong one?
Who is this doris asking the questions 🤦
She clearly knows nothing about technology or china for that matter.
She's asking for the benefit of Sun and Daily Mail readers so they can understand....
Our society is constantly in trouble because we’re always the scratch after the itch. Instead of creating a life that satisfies people so they want for little, we sit around and fix the trouble when it comes, most of the time unsatisfactorily. Someone is always promising a cheaper, tastier, sexier, easier alternative to win us over to the dark side against our better selves.
Just listened to this interview. It has made me proud to be English British. Seriously worrying topic discussed without any swearing or insults. The ex mi6 officer not being afraid to tell the absolute truth as he sees it without the fear of favours. Thank you very much.
Its not just cars that can be disabled remotely, virtually anything electrical we buy now is open to interference..Tv's, Washing machines, Refrigerators and so on and it will become more prevalent
Wow how shocking is the host
Reduce emissions eh? I suggest that you do the research into the entire lifecycle from mining of the raw materials, build and operate, of these units and also the issue of battery recycling. We have not even looked at the emissions from the electricity for charging.
Research? You too.
Correct. Only a full life cycle view provides a fair and complete basis to understand and compare with other solutions.
Journalistic standards 😂
Thanks God we still have some sensible people willing to say what needs to be said in this absurd post modern ultra left Britain
The long game IS China's game for thousands of years.
We buy their vehicles but not their phone systems.😅😅😅
The interviewer's drivel put me off listening Oh Dear Love
Who are these idiots, and why was Richard Dearlove made to suffer them? The standards at the Times have fallen enormously.
This interviewer needs to do her homework🤦♀️ She’s clearly completely naive in regards to what China is doing🤨
Poppy, you are brainwashed ... 🤯 😂
Wake up
Chinese cars have cameras front nose in the mirrors acting like mirrors and back bumpers and ai inside the operating system. So yea they can track you even inside the car and listen .John Mcafee told long time ago that mobiles are the greatest spies.
The west needs to wake up and prioritize resilience over $
I would suggest that the naieve Times Radio interviewer research the subject of the interview before interviewing!!
I wouldn't touch one with a barge pole, including "smartphones" (or whatever they are!), since it's nobody's business what I'm doing, nor where I am! All of those things can follow us, for goodness sake!
Either way if you exchange price for trust you make yourself vulnerable. No nation should make itself dependent and should always have an alternative back up plan.
Yeah, we're going to reintroduce the horse and cart. Inexpensive transport that can be shared by family and friends and the byproduct we can chuck on the garden for compost. Win, win situation 👍.
@geofo60 Funny, but technology products are capable of sharing our data without our knowledge and consent. Smartphones sharing with big tech platforms might seem just a personal privacy issue. Google: Do no evil policy was their attempt to be seen as ethical.
CCP has no such ethical objectives, quite the reverse.
Every chinese enterprise has a CCP 'golden share' so is really controlled by the regime that doesn't respect fair trade, the international rule of law, intellectual property and human rights.
The only vote we have with the CCP dictatorship is not to buy their supposedly cheap products which in reality is an exchange of sovereign capabilities and so a loss of freedom.
A very bad bargain and something not priced into the deal at all, which allows the globalist to trade away our freedom without any accounting of that.
AI requires big data to train the models so where our data goes is a national security issue concerning foreign powers with hostile objectives.
Wake up and smell the coffee.
You want to tell the host to wake up
And they are not even talking about the zillion cameras on EVs nowadays that could be used remotely.
recently in the Philippines, they stopped combustion engine Toyota but with long range LIDAR device embedded in windshield, chinese tech guy and filipino 2 drivers mapping entries to naval ports, airports and military sites (filipino and usa) ... and last week BYD chinese ev maker released largest car carrier ship, 9800 cars onboard ... connect the dots
Before China disabled their cars remotely, I really think Elon Musk and Trump would be first to do it with Tesla and comfortable to do it to his allies who doesn’t pay his 25% tariff or if a nation voted for a left party.
The delegates to China feel very honored and accept all the compliments from the East. Our leaders stand far from normal life! That is where the whole western world has gone wrong since the cold war started.
After your video about XAI308K the coin's price jumped from 50 cents to about $1. You guys nailed it 👏
Bizarrely, I'm listening to an audiobook from years back that depicts just this and attempted assassination via car, albeit done by rogue elements in Japan. Happens a lot recently, Mr Putin seems to have the same taste in fiction as I do, which is worrying.
So, MI6 are concerned about Chinese cars on our roads but happy to serve the Westminster folk? I know who i fear more about standards in public life and the erosion of our civil liberties.
Disabling vehicles is the least of our worries.
Firstly, today almost all cars get OTA updates, and that includes ICE engines as well for their multimedia systems, so you need to separate the drivetrain from the security threat.
Chinese cars are rolling intelligence gathering platforms that are always online, and are equipped with cameras, LIDAR, microphones, GPS and an increasing degree of autonomy.
This means that your "safety features" such as lane keeping assist could easily be subverted to drive you off a cliff if they decide to silence you.
Here in Israel, most men serve in the army reserves. In most military bases, when you report for duty, they won't let you park a Chinese EV in the base car park. You need to park it outside and leg it to the base.
This includes Teslas, since many of them are now made in China as well.
Notable that Tesla CEO never says anything CCP critical since they support and staff the majority of his production.
Huge conflict of interest with USA government and national security!
The interviewer seemed perplexed perse.
I got my XAI308K wallet setup and got in for $7500. Great video 🔥🔥
Privacy will become the least of UK's concerns when the low quality, hurried lithium batteries with low purity elements. Kabooms are as a result
Censorship is very active on this channel - good-bye and 👎
They cant compete with China but will fearmonger about EVs getting hacked 😂😂😂 as if the same doesn't apply to every EV.
Basically… don’t buy a cheap Chinese car!
This is a wake-up call!
"Dearlove"
Thats such a british spy name 😬
Security cameras and cars are a danger. The density of private security cameras makes it possible to follow a person every step of his way in urban areas. Cars could gather information about the people on board (who of course are already identified). Heart rate, bloodpressure, and saturation levels (that could also be controlled remotely over the car’s air conditioning), everything. In a conflict, meddling with the car’s navigation is optional: you are kindly informed of an accident that has occurred ahead and advised to take a detour. Organize 10 such cases in sync, and have them apear on a vital point in the road system, where you disable them.
For those that think all of this is far-fetched: Modern warfare more so than at any time in the past resembles natural evolution greatly sped up. We must be prepared for what might lie ahead.
Thank you for having this guest.
Anyone else been actin broke and putting ALL extra money into XAI308K??
It's a very complex issue.
this interviewer needs to change jobs 🙄
His analysis is lacking a technical understanding of EV and Internet systems, these same risks were already taken by the Tories but was he decrying them?
Yes, he was. Not a party political issue.
Politicians generally have liberal arts or history education not STEM so are ignorant yet not self aware enough to ask for help and pay attention.
Interviewer did not suit the interviewee or topic - please raise the game Times: this was excruciating to watch.
I am Russian, live Samara, and Russian army is such a joke NATO
no longer needed🤷🏼♀️
That's old
@AntonioRomero "There is much truth in old jests". This is a saying in my russia
Poland has the forces and determination to deal with imperialism of RF leaders.
People who love Motherland are safe at home...
PPPPPPPPPPUMP XAI308K incoming. Glad we're early for the presale :)
Smart move. Being that it's new XAI308K will probably hit $0.60 usd by Winter 2025 and next year will boom to like $25. Glad we got in early.
How does trumps ban on CBDC affect XAI308K? i'm assuming it will not touch it but quite the opposite make it boom.
So is it true XAI308K will be the official coin of Europe?
A thick interviewer is so common that often I don't watch
Terrible journalism.
Voice Recording in the car could be used as blackmail. Possibly take control & wreck.
So Cina didn't do it but USA did? Interesting.
i’ve gotta say the female presenters on this channel are shocking.
People don’t think about the consequences of buying a Chinese EV. I am pleased you brought this up. People should buy the electric cars made in the west, to support our own economy not that of China anyway.!
I rather it's gov failure don't you?
The UK Government have already funded the purchase of Chinese EV busses for use in the UK. Yutong have orders for another 500+ busses for 2025 delivery at £400k each.
The technology is scary and yes I agree they can be remotely disabled.
Yutong is a huge Chinese company producing 400+ busses a day!
Data collection and transfer is a foreseeable element of service and sustainment of any public service vehicle.
So that should have been addressed in the vehicle type approval before they enter service. DVLA.gov.uk
The internet protocol supports "multicasting" which allows multiple subscribers to "Tune In" to a specific stream of traffic (such as with IP TV) So tall cars / models from a specific vendor could/will be subscribed to a specific multicast "channel". That is up to the manufacturer to implement and will be completely up them, so in a doomsday scenario all vehicles from a manufacturer could be stunned at the same time with one command.
I only buy European cars, although that can go wrong with over-the air updates.
"XAI308K will nearly 10x it's price by December" You think only 10x? HA.. This thing will be 1000x by December. We are lucky to be able invest now.
Holding XAI308K. I agree it's the next up coming thing.
concerned about ‘security’ 😂 now tell us all about what ‘Elbit Systems’ are up to.
tHE tiMEs own best presstitutes can’t even read names out correctly.
If your not buying XAI308K coin Are you really investing?
A very poor interview, it was played for laughs, like something on a lightweight music radio show. This man has expertise and should have been given more chance to express it.
Her job *is* to challenge the interviewee (unlike the US where they grovel), but unfortunately she really didn't seem to understand or believe his concerns.
She seems to think "Why would they be interested in my little car?" The issue is that they could do things like monitoring activity as a whole and could bringing transport to a halt by switching them all off and blocking the roads.
Politichans are recless!
It's a bit late to worry about privacy and Chinese technology.
After all, I expect the vast majority of us are watching this video on either a smartphone or a laptop manufactured in China.
If China can shut down our cars, they can equally shut down pretty much all of our communications.
As for EV range. My God, what dinosaurs. We live in the UK, a small island. My Tesla standard range (not even a long range) happily drives me hundreds of miles in a day on a family trip with easy and very fast charging available when I need a rest break.
Another point, if China were to take such dire action in a time of conflict, I expect we can do equally nasty things to them.
Any future conflict with China will almost certainly involve the US. The US navy could quite easily stop all oil supply to China from the Middle East, and the Chinese navy, large as it is, could do nothing about it.
How long would China last with their oil supply cut off?
XAI308K is already outperforming ALOT of major coins like SOL and XRP
I am perplexed how this guy could have been head of MI6 to even declare that Chinese EV could be controlled or immobilized by China.
Thus you tell us you know nothing about modern technology...
you should get a job a times radio then pal. you’d fit right in
At least those EV’s are not Fascist Elon’s machines, that’s a huge plus.
No, it's very similar abuse of power.
Every chinese enterprise has a CCP 'golden share' so is really controlled by the regime that doesn't respect fair trade, the international rule of law, intellectual property and human rights.
The only vote we have with the CCP dictatorship is not to buy their supposedly cheap products which in reality is an exchange of sovereign capabilities and so a loss of freedom.
A very bad bargain and something not priced into the deal at all, which allows the globalist to trade away our freedom without any accounting of that.
You will never truly own an EV as your data is shared
We know where you are
While i agree XRP is doing good I think your estimate on XAI308K is too low. It will hit $1M 😎😎😂😂👍
Hey who can help me? I bought my XAI308K and got the 200% bonus as they promised but it won't let me buy more. Is the bonus only one per person??
Elon Ma can sell Tesla cars in China
I'm sorry not everyone is a rich as you. What is it with middle classes you never think about working class. Its all luxury beliefs at the expense of the poor
Data theft impacts everyone regardless of last century ideas like class.
Everyone has smartphones.
Everyone had cars.
Heard Elon's new coin XAI308K will partner with DOGE? True?
Reds under the bed etc…….
Ostriches with head in sand...
Why use the words communist china all the time
The opening 2 minutes of this slagging EVs is just plain pathetic.
I have an EV and drove nearly 2000km across Australia over 2 days. It did wonders for "range anxiety". I have much more confidence in the car. I drive about 20,000km a year, sometimes more. I charge off sunshine on my solar panels.
All well and good that you don't want an EV but I'd rather hear about NATO, and Russia's unprovoked war against Ukraine.
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 🇦🇺
He clearly said that he wasn't against EV just the risk of data collection by a foreign power that is hostile.
Australian government and forces, responsible for national security, agree.
Hopefully your journeys are not shared with a foreign power...
1984
15 minutes of nonsense
Bad journalism but important insight into technology risks
Spokesperson Lady 😂😂😂
Great job 👍
Elon Musk is a legend. Guy drops a new crypto coin (XAI308K) when no one expected it. Can you do a video on a price prediction for it?
🐎
✅XAI308K✅
China, china, china! Nauseating. Im far more worried about the US!
Educate yourself
Top 20 Crypto Coin incoming - XAI308K will crush the markets this year mark my words.
This is how paranoia looks like. Its old, bald, wears glasses and knows not what he's afraid of.
He was specific about the risks and correct that most uk people are unaware what can be done, also too lazy to find out..
Do catch up Britain. Australia was ahead of you in understanding from its intelligence the Huawei threat but it hasn’t any qualms about Chinese electric vehicles, because there isn’t one.
Chinese have infiltrated all the big universities in Australia. The dean of the university in Sydney was actually selected by Chinese as they have the most students in the university they’re not Australian! I don’t know if you knew this.
No surprise .Any electric car is nothing more then a oversized laptop battery with 4 wheels attached to it.
Plus a roofing and some entertainment gadget so that your wife doesn't get bored on the road
@ you forgot about the brain of the car .. A computer!
And you know this how?
@ Nope, the point is that Australian systems intelligence surpassed Britain’s long ago, and if it’s vetted Chinese vehicles, then that’s all the security check that’s needed.