अनुज जी शत् शत् नमन है आपको। एक बार मिलने की बड़ी हार्दिक इच्छा है आपसे। क्यों कि नेताजी की तरह ही 21वीं सदी के तथाकथित आजाद भारत के स्वतंत्रता सेनानी अमर बलिदानी भाई राजीव दीक्षित जी के रहस्यमई मृत्यु को लेकर चर्चा करनी है। जैसे कि आप भी सुभाष जी नेताजी आज तक बने हो। वैसे ही भगत सिंहजी, उधम सिंह जी, चंद्रशेखर आजाद जी, खुदीराम बोस जी, एवम 732000 क्रांतकारियों के सपनों का भारत बनाने के लिए राजीव भाई ने अपने प्राण की आहुति दे दी।
Jay Shree Ram *comment id 452* Will you follow 10 passive rules? *Rule 1* Shantidoot dharm dekh ke logo ko marate he Tum dharm dekh ke sabji etc kharidi karoge? *Rule 2* Kam se kam khud ke family ki raksha kar sako itana mentally physically prepare hona chalu karoge?
Great insights, however Bhala Jee you can't compare Secular word in English constitution with what corresponding in Hindi constitution. That's utterly wrong! Secularism is separate of State from Church. Our dumbheads who brought this word in constitution must be jailed as it's been used as a weapon against Hindus. No definition was given, no meaning was given, it's for the Mi-Lords and Public to keep speculating what it means and how to use it. And Muslims n Christians use it for blatant conversions and expansion of their Mahazabs! Craziness!
U R wrong madam..."ऐसा समझ नहीं आता कि उस वक्त मनीषी थे जिन्ने भ भारत के लिए संविधान स्वतंत्रता संग्राम लड़ा था..." not at all, fighting for freedom for ones own country do not qualify them to be of 'maneeshhee' category - in fact they were far away from anything of the sort. agree comparative studies allowed them to bring out many similarities from other countries (to prove Britishers correct after all) but is anything reflecting the core concepts from our own 'smarties' (which are many in numbers - manu's being more commonly known but hated by the great Ambedkar for whatever English translation lead him to hate it to this extent to burn it in public - created doubts in my mind whether he really was intelligent enough to grasp core of it or merely acted upon anger developed observing those time few (there still exists in certain areas of PUNE even today) - has anybody brought out any parallels of our own dharma-shaastras (plenty in numbers) and English written 'latin-decorated' constitution as exists today?
That' why we are paying heavy price all over these years...any "boards" can claim land without any courts of the nations interventions; just like accidental PM setup for Nalanda Univ re-building but no budgetary accountabilities (carefully passed to his daughters to eat up all cream of INDIAN GOVT SPENDINGS while staying ABROAD). Similarly carefully buying lands for raising churches despite very rare population of the followers with purely business sense acquiring as people know famous McDonalds establishments all over the world.
@@PULKITKAUL-great : You are free to reject it by legislation. The Permanent Settlement of Lands passed by Britisher was changed. So also other laws can be changed.
Jay Shree Ram *comment id 451* Will you follow 10 passive rules? *Rule 1* Shantidoot dharm dekh ke logo ko marate he Tum dharm dekh ke sabji etc kharidi karoge? *Rule 2* Kam se kam khud ke family ki raksha kar sako itana mentally physically prepare hona chalu karoge?
Rs.70 Crore is given due to division of Reserve Bank of Indian. This fact no body tells. The anti-Brahmin sentiment was confined to Pune area only. No where else there was any black clash in other parts of India.
Unfortunately there still exists those idiots in PUNE in some concentrations (one Punekar told me) but U R right, scattered all over INDIA with such wrong notions did not make up actual fabric of entire country - braahmaNa were bhu-deva for not awarded position or appointed by any governmental authorities but rather earned creditability by their hard work that most of missionaries clearly tried to wipe out bcos they wanted success in their attempts failing over 300+ years since the day on British Christians Inception in India.
There nor a single Christian Rashtra in the world. There is no law of Christianity. All tge law of Christian majority country is based on Human Rights and it chabges from time to time.
Correct! Don't need to openly declare such - gather people with same belief systems and then run laws accordingly - remember witch burnings going in Europe for so long? And why do you think separation of Church from State came up? Study little bit! May be you know all these but after all can't be helped after U R already converted!
@@pakakaka4227 : Witch burning still in some part of Jharkhand. Even Blashphemer in Europe were burnt on stakes under Christiandom. Therefore, now there is no Christian countries Governed by Holy Catholic Church. The ptotestantism open Democracy one person one vote Which is adopted by most of the country including India,Bangladesh, Sri Lanka. So we do not say all Demicratic countries are Christian country.
अनुज जी शत् शत् नमन है आपको।
एक बार मिलने की बड़ी हार्दिक इच्छा है आपसे।
क्यों कि नेताजी की तरह ही 21वीं सदी के तथाकथित आजाद भारत के स्वतंत्रता सेनानी
अमर बलिदानी भाई राजीव दीक्षित जी
के रहस्यमई मृत्यु को लेकर चर्चा करनी है।
जैसे कि आप भी सुभाष जी नेताजी आज तक बने हो।
वैसे ही भगत सिंहजी, उधम सिंह जी, चंद्रशेखर आजाद जी, खुदीराम बोस जी, एवम 732000 क्रांतकारियों के सपनों का भारत बनाने के लिए राजीव भाई ने अपने प्राण की आहुति दे दी।
आदरणीय भल्ला साहेब बहुत सारे बिंदुओ पर स्पष्ट दृष्टिकोण प्रस्तुत नहीं कर पाए और विषय- वस्तु को गोलमोल घुमाते नज़र आए ...!
👌👌
🙏🙏
how can i get this book
मनुस्मृति के सिद्धांतों से ही USA एक उत्कृष्ट राष्ट्र बना था।
Usa capitalist he
Jay Shree Ram *comment id 452*
Will you follow 10 passive rules?
*Rule 1*
Shantidoot dharm dekh ke logo ko marate he
Tum dharm dekh ke sabji etc kharidi karoge?
*Rule 2*
Kam se kam khud ke family ki raksha kar sako itana mentally physically prepare hona chalu karoge?
आप इधर भी 😅
@@vivekdubey3280 me?
So there is no dispute or little dispute over the content of the constitution. The dispute is over the Photos.
Wonderful conclusion...no dispute over content...gulaam born dies gulaam!
अरे भाई भारत का संविधान इंडिया एक्ट 1935 पर आधारित है
Great insights, however Bhala Jee you can't compare Secular word in English constitution with what corresponding in Hindi constitution. That's utterly wrong! Secularism is separate of State from Church. Our dumbheads who brought this word in constitution must be jailed as it's been used as a weapon against Hindus. No definition was given, no meaning was given, it's for the Mi-Lords and Public to keep speculating what it means and how to use it. And Muslims n Christians use it for blatant conversions and expansion of their Mahazabs! Craziness!
U R wrong madam..."ऐसा समझ नहीं आता कि उस वक्त मनीषी थे जिन्ने भ भारत के लिए संविधान स्वतंत्रता संग्राम लड़ा था..." not at all, fighting for freedom for ones own country do not qualify them to be of 'maneeshhee' category - in fact they were far away from anything of the sort. agree comparative studies allowed them to bring out many similarities from other countries (to prove Britishers correct after all) but is anything reflecting the core concepts from our own 'smarties' (which are many in numbers - manu's being more commonly known but hated by the great Ambedkar for whatever English translation lead him to hate it to this extent to burn it in public - created doubts in my mind whether he really was intelligent enough to grasp core of it or merely acted upon anger developed observing those time few (there still exists in certain areas of PUNE even today) - has anybody brought out any parallels of our own dharma-shaastras (plenty in numbers) and English written 'latin-decorated' constitution as exists today?
Constitution copy pasted from British law Govt of India act 1935.
There is no written Constitution of British.
@@pavitraranjanswain4010 I said about law passed by British
That' why we are paying heavy price all over these years...any "boards" can claim land without any courts of the nations interventions; just like accidental PM setup for Nalanda Univ re-building but no budgetary accountabilities (carefully passed to his daughters to eat up all cream of INDIAN GOVT SPENDINGS while staying ABROAD). Similarly carefully buying lands for raising churches despite very rare population of the followers with purely business sense acquiring as people know famous McDonalds establishments all over the world.
@@PULKITKAUL-great : You are free to reject it by legislation. The Permanent Settlement of Lands passed by Britisher was changed. So also other laws can be changed.
@@pavitraranjanswain4010 Constitution itself was copy pasted from Act of 1935. Instrument Act of 1881 still exist.
Jay Shree Ram *comment id 451*
Will you follow 10 passive rules?
*Rule 1*
Shantidoot dharm dekh ke logo ko marate he
Tum dharm dekh ke sabji etc kharidi karoge?
*Rule 2*
Kam se kam khud ke family ki raksha kar sako itana mentally physically prepare hona chalu karoge?
Rs.70 Crore is given due to division of Reserve Bank of Indian. This fact no body tells.
The anti-Brahmin sentiment was confined to Pune area only. No where else there was any black clash in other parts of India.
Unfortunately there still exists those idiots in PUNE in some concentrations (one Punekar told me) but U R right, scattered all over INDIA with such wrong notions did not make up actual fabric of entire country - braahmaNa were bhu-deva for not awarded position or appointed by any governmental authorities but rather earned creditability by their hard work that most of missionaries clearly tried to wipe out bcos they wanted success in their attempts failing over 300+ years since the day on British Christians Inception in India.
There nor a single Christian Rashtra in the world. There is no law of Christianity. All tge law of Christian majority country is based on Human Rights and it chabges from time to time.
Correct! Don't need to openly declare such - gather people with same belief systems and then run laws accordingly - remember witch burnings going in Europe for so long? And why do you think separation of Church from State came up? Study little bit! May be you know all these but after all can't be helped after U R already converted!
@@pakakaka4227 : Witch burning still in some part of Jharkhand. Even Blashphemer in Europe were burnt on stakes under Christiandom. Therefore, now there is no Christian countries Governed by Holy Catholic Church. The ptotestantism open Democracy one person one vote Which is adopted by most of the country including India,Bangladesh, Sri Lanka. So we do not say all Demicratic countries are Christian country.
Denmark is openly Christian nation
क्रिस्टेनिटी ने झारखंड को विभाजित करवाकर सिमडेगा अपना लिया अब संथाल परगना भी@@pavitraranjanswain4010
B R Ambedkar was not so good as this speaker thinks.