I rarely make a big bluff online. There always seems to be an opponent who has unlimited cash, loves to take wild chances, and plays like a psychopath.
If you don't bluff in some of these spots, you're surely going to get beat off them by your opponent too much. He may choose to bluff with AQo himself and then you're in a nasty spot as you're probably going to have to fold and give up your flush equity. You just have to live with the fact that sometimes you get called off by nonsense like this.
@MJistheGOAT U really thought for sure u lost when someone called ur 10 high bluff my friend??? Lmfao no offense but derrrrr no shit captain obvious hahaha🤣💯 Don't take it personal man, I'm jk with u yo! But I'm quite interested in this 10 high bluff of urs tho which got called by an 8 high lmfao wtf. Was it on the river? And if u don't mind? Can u break down the whole hand from beginning to end so we kno exactly wtf happened? Lol. Did dude misread his hand to call u with 8 high? Wtf lol
@MJistheGOAT But no bs no lie u ain't lying bout hella mofos out there that'll just absolutely just calls with anything lol real talk! Especially online poker where dudes will fish all the way to the river & will call all in preflop like 98% of the times compares playin in person imho
Negreneua needed a 7,8 diamonds to set the standard for a straight and flush draw lmao.. and if the other player had j4 o, shiz would've been hilarious 😂
The guy knows negreanu plays a very wide range and bluffs. So to me he just made a brave/legitimate call, because he knows what his opponent is capable of
@@bearnecessiteespolio5359 Negreanu does play a wide range, but he's mostly a nit post flop and plays small ball. He's not very capable of huge bluffs for the most part, but i suppose he is when the pots small and he only has 14bbs left behind. I mostly disagree with your perception of D.Negs. He's not a player I'd be hero calling very often with his nit rep.
@SurgingInsight fair enough, good points. I had him down as quite a bluffer but I'm just a casual observer, and now I think on it, it IS just pre-flop I was thinking of, and the odd bluff over the years. I'll take Ur word for it.
AQ and 55 is basically the same hand here. You don't take that line with a 4 very often. It's a very polarizing line on a draw heavy board. AQ might actually be a better hand to call with then 55 here.
I like where youre head is at, but the villain is holding one MASSIVELY important card, which is the queen. YOu want Negreanu to have as many Qs as possible there for his Qhigh dimaond draw bluffs, his KQ QJ Q8 combos, etc.
@@Ballen81587 He played it so face up that you could almost put him on exactly a combo draw. She had the J, so couldn’t be JQ, leaving 87. I think she cheated, based on how she acted afterward and stuff, but there is a case to be made, especially as a rec player.
Sad how people don't see difference in these 2 poker hands. Now even worth explaining to them AQ is beating almost any other Ax hand, 87, JQ, any 2 diamonds, etc
@@marko514 stop pretending like you alone understand poker, and maybe a few other pro's. Everyone watching these videos understands good vs bad bluff catchers, it's just a meme dummy
@@ProdBC its a different style of poker im not too familiar with them.. i think GTO or CTO is the other one but idk what they mean… after watching and learning about BTO tho i think i am a bto player more than the other one.. basically BTO said there was a way robbi could call with the jack high but in the long run is losing basically all their money
@@aprayingatheist2378 not sure what BTO stands for but ik that because she had the jack of clubs she blocked hands like KJ QJ of clubs which were bluffs she lost to so because those hands are ruled out its just KQ clubs 87 86 76 of clubs that are in his bluffing range… so there was a higher chance that he had 87 76 86… but in the long run she throwing her money away… unless shes cheating
I’ll pull ya up a chair 🪑, lol donk call for all chips, I’d understand if maybe if chip situation was different but “hero call” for tourney life. Sketchy
@@bozapub3507 tbh the stacksize is kinda awkward and hence I can understand dnegs making it so big on the flop to be able to pile in on turn. I just feel I would like to make it smaller like 2,4-2,6x eventhough it makes turn and river sizings kinda awkward. I see why the opponent called the turn jam as it just doesn't feel as though he'd choose to size like this with 10x and I'm not sure he raises flop with 4x to get it in on the turn eventhough I think that would be gto approved
He is on the anti-flush draw. for him to make the call, all he needs to believe is that you are on the flush draw. (and then his AQ is actually quite good)
Yeah. His thought process was probably it's a paired board and maybe thought Daniel's bluffing range is weighted towards more flush draws. Maybe didn't see to Daniel's player name tho and assumed he's playing against a donk
@@SparkySubie Why wouldnt a 10 be possible? IMO the guy is just a rich dude from the middle east (his flag) and has the liberty of calling with Ace high.
@@JeffZuccMusk ya my point is that this call is likely better than calling 66 or something, still a very light call either way. I just meant that if the dude tank/calls AQo, he’s never folding JJ or QQ which Daniel said near the end
tbf aq does block some qj bluffs if u can assume dnegs bluff shoves gutshots without diamonds at any frequency which may not be true. dnegs may also shove low diamonds given he has no showdown value (34d, 45d...) and so those 6 pair outs vs aq which still lose to 66 is still a small sonething. but those are 2 really small nitpick things so other than that i agree with u.
If his line made any sense he wouldve bet 33% turn and it would show way more towards valueheavy hands that want to squeeze out a few more blinds instead of shoving on a paired connected board with 2 diamonds. The call makes alot of sense when you put it in perspective.
@@royal_gambit_e4 @Royal Gambit well we can't see the whole table and came in mid hand. so we can't know preflop action, dont even know where the button is so cant tell their position. so we can't rly put people on a range of hands. unless you give credit for a set aq is good vs a majority of hands on a 4 10 10 board. 9 would most likely be a brick and it was and he already has half his stack commited. so counting on ace high to hold up vs a flush draw seems rather logical.
@@jefferykilgore4042 of course there is a logic in his play. It was a semi bluff. We also don’t know the previous hands they have played. But to call all in ?! Position does not tell everything. When the BBs get high the ranges get wider. If they are already in the money then it would be logically to make that move. But they are not.
So if I write this out, I’ll understand this better. So bear with me: On the turn, DNeg goes all in and checking is not an option because if the villain raises (which he will only raise if he has a hand that can likely beat DNeg’s hand), then DNeg will call and likely lose. Or he can fold and lose what he has in the pot so far. But if DNeg jams, villain will either fold if he has a losing hand or not a nut hand or he’ll call if he has a killer hand thus taking all DNeg’s money. I dunno. To me, I’d check, villain may raise, and I’d call only if the raise was small enough…. Seems like a good EV to me.
I wouldn't have called there... but I'm not sure what I'd put Daniel on... Not a 10, not a 9, and not a 4, not a pocket pair, not JJ QQ KK or AA... Danny knows moons more than me... but shipping it here is bad, a better bluff is check raise allin
@@justingoats9155 Other people miss the flop as much as you do on No Limit Hold'Em. It happens a lot. Ace high with a good kicker on a paired board is a pretty good bluff catcher. They both seem to be in an early position in this hand. I guess Daniel 3bet pre flop and he flatted. Ace high in both hands makes sense. Not to mention that Ace on the river online is like having a breakfasts. Just comes all the time.
@@ShadyRecords-n7z I get what you are saying but calling an all in like that is not profitable long term. Do it once in a while if you think you have a good read but it's not a standard play to make all the time
@@keesdejong5712 How does Daniel having Tx hands in his range make that call any better lol. Unless you meant on the flop but that doesn't make any sense either since Daniel is check raise shoving the flop 0% of the time against that sizing.
Before showdown but knowing he was gonna call with AQ, I was able to predict that it would be AsQh. Blocks your nutted suits and unblocks your bluffs in a very polarized spot. Obviously preferable to a hand like 8d8c, and if you think it's an overbluffed spot it also makes sense.
Internet poker is supposed to be for sharpening your skills, internet morons ruined it by going all in every hand because it’s free and you can buy chips. It’s kinda boring now. Going all in every hand is boring to me.
Nah. It was a bad bluff, and a mediocre call. AQ blocks in part someone holding QJ, and the nature of the pot already precludes Dnegs likely having JT. Now the danger is does Dnegs have a middling pair? 7’s 8’s. But they aren’t meant to barrel on these boards. They’re meant to get to showdown without going all in. It’s a very hard call to make. But it’s not terrible. The fact he also block no flush draws especially the nut flush draw also makes the call a bit better. Frankly. Whilst I love Dnegs. In the past 5 years he has been a losing player. His cashes are very inferior to his tournament entry costs. He does well in live tournaments. But in higher stake online tournaments, he doesn’t do great. Guys buying in for $530 have an incredible grasp of the game. They a lot of them are regs. A lot of them on top are regs who do the consistent hard work to stay on top of their game. At least 6 hours playing. 2-3 hours training. Full time job 6 days a week. D negs is a good player.but against that standard of cohort. His best results are usually just cashing before any final table, online. A-5 here of diamonds, shouldn’t be stacking of here, especially with the stack sizes as they are. AQ is probably the bare bottom of your range you’d want to stack off with here, but it’s still marginally within the range. Or as Dnegs says in his trailer for his course. There’s no such thing as a value bluff, lol.
@@Roberto-bf7us sometimes you just have to hero call with A high on a wet board where straight and flush draws are available. You can’t just always call with nothing but the nuts.
I see calls like this online all the time. Or even worse. You have a hand like AKd. They call your flop bet with Q9o. Turn is a Js. You set up for the river jam. They call again. River is a off suit 9. You jam and they call with 3rd pair on a paired board with SD's, over cards that hit your range big time, and boats available.
I'd really love if you went through how this hand would of been played differently rather then "OK bro, you win". We also missed the preflop action. But I guess RUclips shorts are just that. To short.
I'm not sure about the turn sizing, would a T really want to jam turn? I think that's maybe what led him to call. Surely a T wants to extract value from all those weaker hands like 55 66 77 or overpairs, it feels like it's a one third or half pot spot. You'd think you'd pick a sizing that your entire range wants to bet and that's not all in as the strongest portion of your range wouldn't do that. Instead this feels like an accomplisher bet, you're trying to make him fold and he figured it out.
🔴SUBSCRIBE: gg.gl/ytsub🔴
BEST POKER CONTENT EVERYDAY
I rarely make a big bluff online. There always seems to be an opponent who has unlimited cash, loves to take wild chances, and plays like a psychopath.
If you don't bluff in some of these spots, you're surely going to get beat off them by your opponent too much. He may choose to bluff with AQo himself and then you're in a nasty spot as you're probably going to have to fold and give up your flush equity. You just have to live with the fact that sometimes you get called off by nonsense like this.
with access to your whole cards
@MJistheGOAT U really thought for sure u lost when someone called ur 10 high bluff my friend??? Lmfao no offense but derrrrr no shit captain obvious hahaha🤣💯 Don't take it personal man, I'm jk with u yo! But I'm quite interested in this 10 high bluff of urs tho which got called by an 8 high lmfao wtf. Was it on the river? And if u don't mind? Can u break down the whole hand from beginning to end so we kno exactly wtf happened? Lol. Did dude misread his hand to call u with 8 high? Wtf lol
@MJistheGOAT But no bs no lie u ain't lying bout hella mofos out there that'll just absolutely just calls with anything lol real talk! Especially online poker where dudes will fish all the way to the river & will call all in preflop like 98% of the times compares playin in person imho
So true 😂
‘Stick it in and pray’
Me at the brothel
😂😂
Yup I just knew that friggin line was coming goddangit you little rascal
Hahahahaha
😂😂
Or when you’re not trying to bust quick
You can't be all loosey goosey eating a sandwich
can u eat a sandwich? sure
can u be all loosey goosey? yeah, why not?
can u do both at the same time? ABSOLUTELY NOT
Haha
Got his loosey goosey ass 💥😆
😂😂😂
This reminds me of when hellmouth ate a sandwich at the table but it was like a mess eating just the inside like he was afraid of the bread
Whenever I see a perplexed Negreanu reaction I feel like I've been cheated out of a Helmuth tantrum.
lol
bro you speak fluent internet
J4o would be a monster hero call in this spot
😂😂😂😂
I see what you did there
Too soon!!
New Rule: J4 high beats all other hands
Negreneua needed a 7,8 diamonds to set the standard for a straight and flush draw lmao.. and if the other player had j4 o, shiz would've been hilarious 😂
Proof that even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes.
Daniel is the blind squirrel in online poker and he didn't find his nut.
The guy knows negreanu plays a very wide range and bluffs. So to me he just made a brave/legitimate call, because he knows what his opponent is capable of
@@bearnecessiteespolio5359 Negreanu does play a wide range, but he's mostly a nit post flop and plays small ball. He's not very capable of huge bluffs for the most part, but i suppose he is when the pots small and he only has 14bbs left behind. I mostly disagree with your perception of D.Negs. He's not a player I'd be hero calling very often with his nit rep.
@SurgingInsight fair enough, good points. I had him down as quite a bluffer but I'm just a casual observer, and now I think on it, it IS just pre-flop I was thinking of, and the odd bluff over the years. I'll take Ur word for it.
Daniel’s always upbeat and cheery in live games but then online, he’s all swearing and raging.
Cause he’s playing against gto bots lol
@@truckertruthetrutrucker5357dont tell me that lol
Lol cause he doesnt beat those games online
Loves being nice on the camera , fake ass dude
Online poker and real life are completely different . Some of these online players are playing bingo half the time 😂😂
No, live players are whales, like Daniel
Real life is 100% better
@@rafaelduarte4751 💯
Online is for sure a joke
@ronrammer Plenty of live players play bingo too. Go to ur local casino on a Friday or Saturday night.
AQ and 55 is basically the same hand here. You don't take that line with a 4 very often. It's a very polarizing line on a draw heavy board. AQ might actually be a better hand to call with then 55 here.
Don't really want a Q because you want as many JQ as possible in DNeg's hand.
I like where youre head is at, but the villain is holding one MASSIVELY important card, which is the queen. YOu want Negreanu to have as many Qs as possible there for his Qhigh dimaond draw bluffs, his KQ QJ Q8 combos, etc.
He was just 'playing the man', Daniel. 😏
Funny seeing this now after the Robbi Garrett hand a few days ago
At least this guy has ace high and can beat bluffs
This is a legitimate hand to be call all-in in a tournament on a board texture like that.
Karen Adelstein would demand his chips back!!
@@Ballen81587 He played it so face up that you could almost put him on exactly a combo draw. She had the J, so couldn’t be JQ, leaving 87.
I think she cheated, based on how she acted afterward and stuff, but there is a case to be made, especially as a rec player.
she called with jack 4 honey
This guy needs to give the money back, it was a bad call. Please, someone, message that guy. Garrett set the standard. lmaooo
ace high vs jack high is completely different i hope you're kidding
Hahahahha
Sad how people don't see difference in these 2 poker hands. Now even worth explaining to them
AQ is beating almost any other Ax hand, 87, JQ, any 2 diamonds, etc
Wow you guys must get invited to a lot of parties
@@marko514 stop pretending like you alone understand poker, and maybe a few other pro's. Everyone watching these videos understands good vs bad bluff catchers, it's just a meme dummy
"just Stick it in and pray".... facts of life
😂😂😂Daniel was flabbergasted by that call
It was a stupid call. Calling with Ace high makes no sense.
Robbi hero called Daniel here too! BTO is taking over
I want to be in on the joke what is BTO
@@ProdBC its a different style of poker im not too familiar with them.. i think GTO or CTO is the other one but idk what they mean… after watching and learning about BTO tho i think i am a bto player more than the other one.. basically BTO said there was a way robbi could call with the jack high but in the long run is losing basically all their money
GTO means Game Theory optimally so BTO probably means Bluff Theory optimally
But idk
@@aprayingatheist2378 not sure what BTO stands for but ik that because she had the jack of clubs she blocked hands like KJ QJ of clubs which were bluffs she lost to so because those hands are ruled out its just KQ clubs 87 86 76 of clubs that are in his bluffing range… so there was a higher chance that he had 87 76 86… but in the long run she throwing her money away… unless shes cheating
@@marci-anna7101 oh yeah, she was cheating for sure
"He called with king queen honey"😂😂😂
An aggressive call would think Phil Hellmuth
Guess not Phil, Phil would have something . And he is not Israeli.
@@lemistshu Ok weirdo
I see the robbi comments are not disappointing me😏
That’s an insane call tbh
He probably just wanted to make a hero call against Daniel lol
Daniel took all the hair from his armpits and put it on his head
😂😂😂😂 foul
No wonder he puts deodorant on his head.
😂
Having a spade and a heart is a good incentive to hero call with AQ
Uhhhh what?
@@kaii3232 unblocks all the ace high Q x flush draws having offsuit cards
I’ll pull ya up a chair 🪑, lol donk call for all chips, I’d understand if maybe if chip situation was different but “hero call” for tourney life. Sketchy
@@CryptoS4vage you haven’t ran deep have you. Takes nuts
@@redunkuliousballer he has no blockers how is that good incentive to call
😂 Getting a bit emotional😂 I know the feeling you're sitting with so well😅
That was Daniels speech in the mirror the first time with Amanda "just stick it in and...pray "
LoL
then Amanda asked him, Are u in yet?
‘AQ fkn high’ or ‘Fk I’m dominated’ good call
Welcome to online, dear daniel offline😂
So Daniel is just like me when I play online...cussing and talking to myself when my bluff gets called 😂
3x raising that flop leaving an spr of less then 1 seems kinda shit imo
How much would you make it?
@@bozapub3507 tbh the stacksize is kinda awkward and hence I can understand dnegs making it so big on the flop to be able to pile in on turn. I just feel I would like to make it smaller like 2,4-2,6x eventhough it makes turn and river sizings kinda awkward. I see why the opponent called the turn jam as it just doesn't feel as though he'd choose to size like this with 10x and I'm not sure he raises flop with 4x to get it in on the turn eventhough I think that would be gto approved
2022 - the year of the hero call
ASK HIM TO GIVE THE MONEY BACK LOL
DNeg doing his version of Hellmuth impression.. 😂😂😂
He is on the anti-flush draw.
for him to make the call, all he needs to believe is that you are on the flush draw. (and then his AQ is actually quite good)
Yeah. His thought process was probably it's a paired board and maybe thought Daniel's bluffing range is weighted towards more flush draws. Maybe didn't see to Daniel's player name tho and assumed he's playing against a donk
@@SparkySubie Why wouldnt a 10 be possible? IMO the guy is just a rich dude from the middle east (his flag) and has the liberty of calling with Ace high.
“Honey I can’t believe they called me with AQ with possible straight and flush draws”
These 10 10 9 boards - clearly cheating we now have found Robis online name
what is this site or platform called
What a call!
Stick it in and pray was my motto in high school
Daniel thinking he might have JJ was the best lol, dude is tanking A high no flush blockers and he’s gonna fold JJ lol
In hindsight everything is so easy😉
No flush blockers is good for the villain...
@@JeffZuccMusk ya my point is that this call is likely better than calling 66 or something, still a very light call either way. I just meant that if the dude tank/calls AQo, he’s never folding JJ or QQ which Daniel said near the end
@@anthonycarreira8045 Yeah makes sense! AQ is better. Low pairs can even get counterfeited or lose vs Daniels overcards etc
@Jamie Campion What up mate?
what platform they are playing !
Thats a bad call for me . A never risking my tournament with 💩
No its a good call because he was in the lead
He read u like a book
He read all his books
What app/ platform is he using
Tenlobarosh means give it to him on the head in Hebrew lol
"He's has a tough decision, oh, f##$! LOL!
AQ is pretty much the same as 66 tbh.
tbf aq does block some qj bluffs if u can assume dnegs bluff shoves gutshots without diamonds at any frequency which may not be true. dnegs may also shove low diamonds given he has no showdown value (34d, 45d...) and so those 6 pair outs vs aq which still lose to 66 is still a small sonething. but those are 2 really small nitpick things so other than that i agree with u.
@@m4ne116 Nah you right, definitely still rather have 66 in this spot, just that both are bluff catchers.
If his line made any sense he wouldve bet 33% turn and it would show way more towards valueheavy hands that want to squeeze out a few more blinds instead of shoving on a paired connected board with 2 diamonds. The call makes alot of sense when you put it in perspective.
Win or lose, Daniel is the man.
Daniel shaves his armpit hair 😂😂😂
its used as transplants on his bald head
@@BigTV-ke1nn MVP comment award!
What does the monetary denomination signify? For example how much is 30 BB worth?
Everyone moaning and calling him an idiot, he could have easily made an very good read
Easily? Ego based call. Most case scenario he has six outs on the river.
@@royal_gambit_e4 lol that's not an outlandish call at all?
@@jefferykilgore4042 what do you mean?
@@royal_gambit_e4 @Royal Gambit well we can't see the whole table and came in mid hand. so we can't know preflop action, dont even know where the button is so cant tell their position. so we can't rly put people on a range of hands. unless you give credit for a set aq is good vs a majority of hands on a 4 10 10 board. 9 would most likely be a brick and it was and he already has half his stack commited. so counting on ace high to hold up vs a flush draw seems rather logical.
@@jefferykilgore4042 of course there is a logic in his play. It was a semi bluff. We also don’t know the previous hands they have played. But to call all in ?! Position does not tell everything. When the BBs get high the ranges get wider. If they are already in the money then it would be logically to make that move. But they are not.
So if I write this out, I’ll understand this better. So bear with me:
On the turn, DNeg goes all in and checking is not an option because if the villain raises (which he will only raise if he has a hand that can likely beat DNeg’s hand), then DNeg will call and likely lose. Or he can fold and lose what he has in the pot so far. But if DNeg jams, villain will either fold if he has a losing hand or not a nut hand or he’ll call if he has a killer hand thus taking all DNeg’s money.
I dunno. To me, I’d check, villain may raise, and I’d call only if the raise was small enough…. Seems like a good EV to me.
Fun fact: “TenLoBarosh” loosely translates to “F him up” (it literally translates to “give it to him in the head”).
I wouldn't have called there... but I'm not sure what I'd put Daniel on... Not a 10, not a 9, and not a 4, not a pocket pair, not JJ QQ KK or AA... Danny knows moons more than me... but shipping it here is bad, a better bluff is check raise allin
he has the appropriate israeli nickname :)
great call תןלובראש
he really did
What app is he playing on?
That's pretty standard call online. Well I don't know if it's a good call against Daniel.
ace high on the turn? thats so risky
@@justingoats9155 Other people miss the flop as much as you do on No Limit Hold'Em. It happens a lot. Ace high with a good kicker on a paired board is a pretty good bluff catcher. They both seem to be in an early position in this hand. I guess Daniel 3bet pre flop and he flatted. Ace high in both hands makes sense. Not to mention that Ace on the river online is like having a breakfasts. Just comes all the time.
@@ShadyRecords-n7z I get what you are saying but calling an all in like that is not profitable long term. Do it once in a while if you think you have a good read but it's not a standard play to make all the time
Put dnegs on a draw, great call.
Nice analysis lmao
@@pierrearr no kidding, lol, oh well online creating bad habits for players is fine by me
@@pierrearr Daniel wouldn't have jammed with a T would he? So why are you laughing
@@keesdejong5712 How does Daniel having Tx hands in his range make that call any better lol. Unless you meant on the flop but that doesn't make any sense either since Daniel is check raise shoving the flop 0% of the time against that sizing.
@@pierrearr if Daniel had a ten he would not jammed postflop I mean
That's a damn good call with AQ at the right time
That is an awful call.
He probably concluded that if you don't have the 9 or 10, and even if you have Ax of diamonds, he's crushing you so, nice call and gg.
Before showdown but knowing he was gonna call with AQ, I was able to predict that it would be AsQh. Blocks your nutted suits and unblocks your bluffs in a very polarized spot. Obviously preferable to a hand like 8d8c, and if you think it's an overbluffed spot it also makes sense.
Also could arguably be a better calling hand than JcJd in this spot
@@erikolson5291better calling hand with possible trips out there??? lo😂😂
He call with ace Queen 😂 what a fish
That was a stellar call fr. I like it!
One of those great defense better offense situations
Cant people be stream sniping you?
Nah, he s playing with a long enough delay so that doesn t happen.
yeah, he's so good that he still wins with them knowing his cards.
It just proves Poker Pros are better in person.
Or people are more loose online
Hey ! i'm supporting the channel.
never confuse Luck for skill
Internet poker is supposed to be for sharpening your skills, internet morons ruined it by going all in every hand because it’s free and you can buy chips. It’s kinda boring now. Going all in every hand is boring to me.
That must've been cheating. Negreanu should get his money back
"ok bro, you win" :D
SO that y all shock you but when a chick calls w j4 for 100k everyone say it’s a good play and defend her 😭😭😭😂😂😂😂😂
Nobody in the history of poker said or will ever say it was a good call by Robbi, don't be silly
@@keniffkeniff yes it was a good call. She knew she was winning bc she cheated so obviously it was the right call
Plot twist he was watching the stream
Plot twist killer: Streams are on delay.
That's what happens when you're all loosey goosey live.
GG poker when you launch in India? Please tell me.
It is already there
@@akshit4984 no bro it's not?
Very bad aggressive. Very bad call too.
Why is it a bad call. No worse than Neg's all in with worse cards. He knew Neg was bluffing.
@watson returns The same way any top player figures things like that out. Betting pattern, and things like that.
me too daniel, i do be sticking it in and praying
Praying that she doesn't ask, Are u in yet?
what a horrible call omw
Nah. It was a bad bluff, and a mediocre call. AQ blocks in part someone holding QJ, and the nature of the pot already precludes Dnegs likely having JT.
Now the danger is does Dnegs have a middling pair? 7’s 8’s. But they aren’t meant to barrel on these boards. They’re meant to get to showdown without going all in.
It’s a very hard call to make. But it’s not terrible.
The fact he also block no flush draws especially the nut flush draw also makes the call a bit better.
Frankly. Whilst I love Dnegs.
In the past 5 years he has been a losing player. His cashes are very inferior to his tournament entry costs.
He does well in live tournaments. But in higher stake online tournaments, he doesn’t do great. Guys buying in for $530 have an incredible grasp of the game. They a lot of them are regs. A lot of them on top are regs who do the consistent hard work to stay on top of their game. At least 6 hours playing. 2-3 hours training. Full time job 6 days a week.
D negs is a good player.but against that standard of cohort. His best results are usually just cashing before any final table, online.
A-5 here of diamonds, shouldn’t be stacking of here, especially with the stack sizes as they are.
AQ is probably the bare bottom of your range you’d want to stack off with here, but it’s still marginally within the range.
Or as Dnegs says in his trailer for his course. There’s no such thing as a value bluff, lol.
,,Did I already tell you how I called Daniel with A high that time, kids? No? This was an excellent read.''
Daniel got stream sniped for sure. That's what the time bank was for.
lol he wasnt sniped.
I don't think that's it he has like a 5-10 min delay on his stream if not even more. He's careful with his money
@@georgeskhater487 then I'd like to know what the caller is smoking and where to get some of that.
@@Roberto-bf7us If you find out don't smoke alone hmu
@@Roberto-bf7us sometimes you just have to hero call with A high on a wet board where straight and flush draws are available. You can’t just always call with nothing but the nuts.
Where is he playing?
This feels like someone who sees the cards of the opponent 😂 through a cheat code
I see calls like this online all the time. Or even worse. You have a hand like AKd. They call your flop bet with Q9o. Turn is a Js. You set up for the river jam. They call again. River is a off suit 9. You jam and they call with 3rd pair on a paired board with SD's, over cards that hit your range big time, and boats available.
How is the name of that poker online platform?
Can someone help this man with anger management
How does he win? Isn't it a chop? With the 2 pairs on the board?
No. Pair of 10's only. The river was a 8. Pair of 10's , AQ9 wins.
Is it a YT thing that I can’t see when this was posted? I’m curious the dates of the actual game and posting of the video and can’t easily see either.
That was a mustard call holy shit 😂
I don’t think the AQ is much different than 6’s or 7’s. To be honest. Definitely better than AQ but not by much versus your range.
Did he live stream this? Where at
Are the cards cut off on the screen for anyone else?
does anyone know what video on his channel this is from?
are these live? because how do you know your opponent isn't watching your cards?
looks like you ended greasy side up! 😂
What just happened... Oh ya! Online poker!
Online poker has too many ways to be rigged. Not for me, live always
I'd really love if you went through how this hand would of been played differently rather then "OK bro, you win". We also missed the preflop action. But I guess RUclips shorts are just that. To short.
what is this website name
He got JEWED lol
What a fantastic call against the actual goat
How do you even stream a poker game? The opponent could be watching right?
I'm not sure about the turn sizing, would a T really want to jam turn? I think that's maybe what led him to call. Surely a T wants to extract value from all those weaker hands like 55 66 77 or overpairs, it feels like it's a one third or half pot spot. You'd think you'd pick a sizing that your entire range wants to bet and that's not all in as the strongest portion of your range wouldn't do that. Instead this feels like an accomplisher bet, you're trying to make him fold and he figured it out.