as much as i love these videos, someone messed up the conversion proccess and recorded a 50hz video at 60hz, wich causes the constant juttering, its horrible
That the Ship's Engineer was unable to escape his cabin is stark testimony to the suddenness and rapidity of the post collision capsize! Compared to open seas, a ship's crew may have felt a degree of safety on this canal route. The Salvage Crew were not just righting and removing a wreck, they were preserving a Marine Accident Investigation Board/Branch accident scene, where the control settings on the Bridge would have been of paramount importance to Accident Investigators, and possibly Insurance Investigators too. The retrieval of the lost Crewman would be of upmost importance, in order for the Coroner to establish the cause of death, and for the body to be released to the family. Whilst the engineering, technical, environmental and meteorological aspects of the wreck righting and retrieval are surely daunting, so too must be the task of locating, inspecting, detailing and removing the bodies of lost Crewmen. Ultimately, it is to be hoped that if there are to be lessons learned from disasters such as these, then those lessons, incorporated into Operating Practice and Procedures, may prevent future events and loss of life and vessels! Thank you for producing and publishing this video, which gives a fascinating insight into the world of Marine Salvage.
Looks like the Chief Engineer was seen on deck after the collision, though not in all the appropriate gear. No-one knows when & why he went back inside. www.bsu-bund.de/SharedDocs/pdf/EN/Investigation_Report/2003/Investigation_Report_32_02.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
@@tnexus13 Thank you for this very helpful report. Your helpful post and link mark the very best aspects of the wonderful people whom contribute to social media message boards to help inform and update.
@@felixcat9318 Yes , reading the official report would have kept you from making up shit about "the stunning rapidity of sinking" causing the engineers death. Take note that the crew of the UNO refused to talk to the German police after they lawyered up: so the whole thing smells of something rotten in Denmark.
@@deconteesawyer5758 In Section 2 of the Accident Report, referred to as the Summary, it clearly states in paragraph 3 that, "the vessel capsized rapidly". The Chief Engineer had been seen on deck after the collision but had reentered the vessel after which it rapidly capsized, trapping and drowning him in the cabin his body was discovered in when the wreck had been salvaged after 2 weeks. As I said in my thanks to the poster whom provided the link to the Marine Accident Investigation Report, there are wonderful people whom contribute to these forums to help share knowledge. Unfortunately, there are also others, malcontents with bad mouths, acting in bad faith in order to seek attention or due to some other personal failing, of which you are merely the latest! Somewhere, the underside of a rock awaits its inhabitant...
@@felixcat9318 "Rapidly capsizing" is subjective and was not the cause of the man's death. You get all butthurt when called out for speculating without looking into the facts and then want to degenerate and vilify ? Good luck with that. Edit: And another thing I must call you out on is calling it an accident. You refer to the the casualty report as an "accident report". Bullshit. It was not an accident report. An accident is something that cannot be predicted and cannot be prevented. The collision was in all likelihood preventable as was the death. The engineer chose his demise, sealed his fate. The proximal cause of his death was his action of going into the cabins from a point of safety on the deck while the vessel was capsizing. The guy was certainly not acting rationally, if it took a half hour he may still not have found his way out.
So ... Was she repaired and put back into service, or was the cost to repair/replace all the machinery and systems cost prohibitive, and she was broken up for scrap?
apart from the inexplicable low image quality the video has been edited as a commercial not a “documentary” . There are no shots of the ship “ all together” nor from above nor about underwater work
Considering the murkey water and limited visibility, there is little wonder why no video of the underwater work. I'd be shocked if visibility was as much as 10 to 12 inches. Much more likely it was 8 inches or less, judging by how well you could see the diver's legs when they were swimming on the surface.
I'd guess in a calm canal like this with only one hole would be cheaper than on a reef or shore in an ocean with waves and storms and multiple holes or a broken keel or the ship in two pieces. The weight of the ship probably also affects cost. Oil leaks increase costs because they have to stop the oil leaking and clean up any oil leaked. The M/V Rena on a New Zealand reef was one of the most expensive. An article from 2013 estimated it would cost $135 million. A 2015 article said it cost $317 million. The most expensive ever was the Concordia which cost $1 Billion. A cargo ship in the English Channel cost $40 Million. Small sailing boats cost a lot less. One I found cost $40,000.
Good video presentation. Rip for the lost engineer. I wonder from a technical and cost perspective. If it's not cheaper/easier/faster to weld a patch instead of the explosive gun method used in this case? Any thoughts?!
Welding underwater is not easy by any standards. Considering the damage to the boat, the hull may have been warped. Using these bolts may be easier to attach the plate and even out any dents or bulges. I never heard of such a device by the way. But I do see the merit of it. Good question by the way. Hope they respond to your question. I am an engineer but not naval.
@@cf6282 any underwater work is difficult. I just wonder when these salvage teams will start using personal submarines like the Deep Worker. A 1 or 2 person sub that can go 1000 metres deep without pressurizing the air. Good for 6 hours of work on a charge. With less risk of a diver getting the bends it makes the jobs that bit safer. Nuytco makes a number of subs, all can operate without being pressurized to the same depth.
The method used would be faster than welding in a submerged environment. Trying to get and keep an arc going to weld under water is a slow process, gas welding doesn't work.
Yes , because they had to deal with him for years. "Some of the crew members on the deck had after the collision seen the chief engineer sitting on a bollard. One of them asked him why he was not wearing his emergency suit and the chief engineer had answered back, that he could swim and that he would stay where he was." quote from the official investigative report. No explanation could be given that would lead a reasonable or prudent person to go back into the cabins with the ship listing badly and rapidly sinking.
@@bart-d3208 Good i hope we can get to know each other if you dont mind you can write me on my google hangout lydialas111@gmail.com can you also give me yours if you dont mind
Lördag den 21 november 2020. Call sign: OWKY6 , IMO 7103186 Collided with DETTMER TANK 116 after rudder failure and capsized in the Kiel Canal on July 11, 2002. The chief engineer of the Uno lost his life. Scrapped in Klaipeda, Lithuania later in 2002. www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=1691518 Casualty report: www.dma.dk/SiteCollectionDocuments/OKE/List-marine-accident-reports-per-year/UNOdettmer.pdf I feel sad over the dead man and the end of a nice ship. I have been a pleasure sailor until my s/y Ofelia was stolen and destroyed by Swedish criminal authorities. It is dangerous to have opinions in our corrupt Sweden. Med vänlig hälsning Tomas. Före detta skeppare på s/y Ofelia och Pappa till ”Fallet Axel, 29 år!" på gidlöf.se (or tomasgidlof.se/) Myndigheter har med våld utomrättsligt rånat mig på båten. Ett politiskt brott.
They built the canal in 1890 from dirt , they raised the giant sunken ship.........and nobody can get the video speed setting right in this video ? Lmfao 🤪
These salvage people are fantastic, what a job they are faced with. The loads and forces don't bear thinking about. Damn good job men.
Very informative. Love these videos.
Sad about the engineer that didn't' make it.
Probably digitized from vhs, this ship wrecked in 2003
AS sad as the death of the engineer was at least the body was found and his family can have closure . Unlike a great many ship sinkings.
Logan Johnson 074
as much as i love these videos, someone messed up the conversion proccess and recorded a 50hz video at 60hz, wich causes the constant juttering, its horrible
It happend when RUclips updated a few years ago. before they were running fine.
it is a bad telecine conversion 25fps to 30 fps, it is doing it by duplicating frames
Great documentary.
That the Ship's Engineer was unable to escape his cabin is stark testimony to the suddenness and rapidity of the post collision capsize!
Compared to open seas, a ship's crew may have felt a degree of safety on this canal route.
The Salvage Crew were not just righting and removing a wreck, they were preserving a Marine Accident Investigation Board/Branch accident scene, where the control settings on the Bridge would have been of paramount importance to Accident Investigators, and possibly Insurance Investigators too.
The retrieval of the lost Crewman would be of upmost importance, in order for the Coroner to establish the cause of death, and for the body to be released to the family.
Whilst the engineering, technical, environmental and meteorological aspects of the wreck righting and retrieval are surely daunting, so too must be the task of locating, inspecting, detailing and removing the bodies of lost Crewmen.
Ultimately, it is to be hoped that if there are to be lessons learned from disasters such as these, then those lessons, incorporated into Operating Practice and Procedures, may prevent future events and loss of life and vessels!
Thank you for producing and publishing this video, which gives a fascinating insight into the world of Marine Salvage.
Looks like the Chief Engineer was seen on deck after the collision, though not in all the appropriate gear. No-one knows when & why he went back inside.
www.bsu-bund.de/SharedDocs/pdf/EN/Investigation_Report/2003/Investigation_Report_32_02.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
@@tnexus13 Thank you for this very helpful report.
Your helpful post and link mark the very best aspects of the wonderful people whom contribute to social media message boards to help inform and update.
@@felixcat9318 Yes , reading the official report would have kept you from making up shit about "the stunning rapidity of sinking" causing the engineers death. Take note that the crew of the UNO refused to talk to the German police after they lawyered up: so the whole thing smells of something rotten in Denmark.
@@deconteesawyer5758 In Section 2 of the Accident Report, referred to as the Summary, it clearly states in paragraph 3 that, "the vessel capsized rapidly".
The Chief Engineer had been seen on deck after the collision but had reentered the vessel after which it rapidly capsized, trapping and drowning him in the cabin his body was discovered in when the wreck had been salvaged after 2 weeks.
As I said in my thanks to the poster whom provided the link to the Marine Accident Investigation Report, there are wonderful people whom contribute to these forums to help share knowledge.
Unfortunately, there are also others, malcontents with bad mouths, acting in bad faith in order to seek attention or due to some other personal failing, of which you are merely the latest!
Somewhere, the underside of a rock awaits its inhabitant...
@@felixcat9318 "Rapidly capsizing" is subjective and was not the cause of the man's death. You get all butthurt when called out for speculating without looking into the facts and then want to degenerate and vilify ? Good luck with that.
Edit: And another thing I must call you out on is calling it an accident. You refer to the the casualty report as an "accident report". Bullshit. It was not an accident report. An accident is something that cannot be predicted and cannot be prevented. The collision was in all likelihood preventable as was the death. The engineer chose his demise, sealed his fate. The proximal cause of his death was his action of going into the cabins from a point of safety on the deck while the vessel was capsizing. The guy was certainly not acting rationally, if it took a half hour he may still not have found his way out.
So ... Was she repaired and put back into service, or was the cost to repair/replace all the machinery and systems cost prohibitive, and she was broken up for scrap?
Everything is calm, no shouting or panic. Everyone knows their part.
Yes its not produced by Discovery channel
lot of people do lots of different type of work in this world really interesting
Hoewel lang geleden goeie kwaliteit video!
That must have been one of the simplest tasks ever, but the cox gun was interesting
apart from the inexplicable low image quality the video has been edited as a commercial not a “documentary” . There are no shots of the ship “ all together” nor from above nor about underwater work
Its got a very low budget. Camera is on someone's shoulder , not in a helicopter and not going diving
Considering the murkey water and limited visibility, there is little wonder why no video of the underwater work. I'd be shocked if visibility was as much as 10 to 12 inches. Much more likely it was 8 inches or less, judging by how well you could see the diver's legs when they were swimming on the surface.
étant vieux marin de commerce :sur vraquier ,très jolie vidéo
The fish called the ship home must be like oh crap we gotta move out
Does anyone hav3 a guess of the cost of a salvage like this . It would be interesting to know
I'd guess in a calm canal like this with only one hole would be cheaper than on a reef or shore in an ocean with waves and storms and multiple holes or a broken keel or the ship in two pieces. The weight of the ship probably also affects cost. Oil leaks increase costs because they have to stop the oil leaking and clean up any oil leaked. The M/V Rena on a New Zealand reef was one of the most expensive. An article from 2013 estimated it would cost $135 million. A 2015 article said it cost $317 million. The most expensive ever was the Concordia which cost $1 Billion. A cargo ship in the English Channel cost $40 Million. Small sailing boats cost a lot less. One I found cost $40,000.
@@Gonken88 Costa Concordia salvage cost is closer to 1 billion dollars.
@@WarM001 You're absolutely right, I was referring to a BS source.
Altijd indrukwekkend om de mannen van Wijsmuller een klus te zien klaren 😎
That was just cool to watch
Did they end up repairing the ship and returning it to service, or did they chop it up for scrap?
For sure scrapped, it was built in 1971.
She sank in the Phillipines in 2013. Still there.
@@jaquigreenlees no she is scrapped in Klaipeda in Lithuania later in 2002
Was the Uno scraped?
Yes,scrapped ,it was not returned to service after this , it was scrapped in Lithuania
☹️ That shuddering is doing my eyes in 😣
apparently, they know more about ship salvage than video editing...
That took a dark turn....
that is the coolest bolt gun ever
Great video.
How many times was the word "environment" used?
Who cares?
In Sovjet China and India not one time!
@@gurnblanstein9816 Ouer children.
If you set the playback speed to 1.25x it's alot better.
People living north of Virginia use 1.5
Good video presentation. Rip for the lost engineer.
I wonder from a technical and cost perspective.
If it's not cheaper/easier/faster to weld a patch instead of the explosive gun method used in this case? Any thoughts?!
Welding underwater is not easy by any standards. Considering the damage to the boat, the hull may have been warped. Using these bolts may be easier to attach the plate and even out any dents or bulges. I never heard of such a device by the way. But I do see the merit of it. Good question by the way. Hope they respond to your question. I am an engineer but not naval.
@@cf6282 any underwater work is difficult.
I just wonder when these salvage teams will start using personal submarines like the Deep Worker. A 1 or 2 person sub that can go 1000 metres deep without pressurizing the air. Good for 6 hours of work on a charge. With less risk of a diver getting the bends it makes the jobs that bit safer.
Nuytco makes a number of subs, all can operate without being pressurized to the same depth.
The method used would be faster than welding in a submerged environment. Trying to get and keep an arc going to weld under water is a slow process, gas welding doesn't work.
Oh, I like that bolt gun.
My deepest sympathy to the family of the engineer.
Yes , because they had to deal with him for years. "Some of the crew members on the deck had after the collision seen the chief engineer sitting on a bollard. One of them asked him why he was not wearing his emergency suit and the chief engineer had answered back, that he could swim and that he would stay where he was." quote from the official investigative report.
No explanation could be given that would lead a reasonable or prudent person to go back into the cabins with the ship listing badly and rapidly sinking.
What up with the choppy video. So distracting.
ill think you can do it better......
What happened to the ship
2:00 Put's a different perspective on "clean scrap". :-D
@Hi Bart how are you doing
@@lydialas1649 I am doing very well! Yourself? :-D
@@bart-d3208 Good i hope we can get to know each other if you dont mind you can write me on my google hangout lydialas111@gmail.com can you also give me yours if you dont mind
The uno used a uno reverse card on it ship XD
Très intéressante vidéo.
Like the Mary Ellen Carter, rise again!
You can tell they finished up with the left edge of the patch only putting in about 1/2 the bolts.
both vertical runs are missing bolts. Could be they avoided a seam or structural component
did u edit this clip with a potato?
good video
I have seen videos where those giant cranes couldn't take the load and flipped over. Then you'd have to start all over again with bigger cranes.
*Yeah, thats a big crash!
i.d never have thought blotting paper could help with industrial oil spills, 11:18.
mark lewis
They can absorb a lot of oil whiteout taking in any water. I use those a lot in my work with smaller yachts to clean the engine room.
RIP C/E.
My cox gun is new and improved
Uno sank, uno pulled a reverse card
Sookie the Dookie.
Like your screen name and the uno reverse card comment.
😁
May the Engineer, RIP
Safer than, not then.
The video is messed up.
Pity you skipped the entire righting of the vessel.
I think both 6:03 and 16:19 are strange ways to connect steel cables at this level of work.
Edit. Great video :)
a few hardhats, no life jackets
Play it at x2 speed and thank me later!
YouKnow?
No, i don't know.
I bought a cheaper RCA to USB video converter back in the mid 2000's , it did this same "Jerking" video.
In the mid 2000's , video convertors could already capture at full 25 fps or higher frame rates...
Uno did not have Uno reverse.
Serious sump pumps
why is this running at like 5 fps? a 90s flip phone could of recorded it better
Lördag den 21 november 2020.
Call sign: OWKY6 , IMO 7103186
Collided with DETTMER TANK 116 after rudder failure and capsized in the Kiel Canal on July 11, 2002. The chief engineer of the Uno lost his life. Scrapped in Klaipeda, Lithuania later in 2002.
www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=1691518
Casualty report: www.dma.dk/SiteCollectionDocuments/OKE/List-marine-accident-reports-per-year/UNOdettmer.pdf
I feel sad over the dead man and the end of a nice ship.
I have been a pleasure sailor until my s/y Ofelia was stolen and destroyed by Swedish criminal authorities. It is dangerous to have opinions in our corrupt Sweden.
Med vänlig hälsning
Tomas.
Före detta skeppare på s/y Ofelia och
Pappa till ”Fallet Axel, 29 år!" på gidlöf.se (or tomasgidlof.se/) Myndigheter har med våld utomrättsligt rånat mig på båten. Ett politiskt brott.
Sorry but all links are missing ...please check And post their new location...
@@patsematary I check if it is possible to answer You. / Tomas. It seems to work. I try one more.
@@patsematary The tube blocked my little longer answer. Please find again
on Danish Maritime Authority
Looks like a job for Mammoet. Pick that sucker up and throw it on the beach.
Couldn’t watch to jumpy
Enoch
Enoch
Enoch
Rolland
Round
Indonesia rolland
Library
Salvage
Scrap
Canvas
They built the canal in 1890 from dirt , they raised the giant sunken ship.........and nobody can get the video speed setting right in this video ? Lmfao 🤪
A very unsafe operation with everyone working without lifevests.
This jerky video presentation is very disconcerting.
Yeah, it's pretty much unwatchable for me as it kicks up a migraine.
Sadness
Edyta Górniak oczyszczenie komórki z wirosow
Spoilt by the dreadfully stilted commentary.
Bad Grammer.. words left out. Like the voice over guy reads a script prepared by an overconfident english as second language person
Oh man the stuttering video
3
Too jerky. I'm out of here.
Boats Sink! no one knows why they just do.