Hello Yuanming, if I have a system where all the particles in the whole domain are moving uniformly, I am wondering whether your MLS-MPM will be still much faster? Another question is, I have some knowledge of the Particle-In-Cell approach, in this approach, the particles/parcels are numerical points, which means that they don't have physical size. Is this case in the MPM approach? The last question is how about couping MPM approach with CFD fluid flow?
![[SIGGRAPH Asia 2019] The Taichi Programming Language](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wKw8LMF3Djo/mqdefault.jpg)
![[SIGGRAPH Asia 2019] The Taichi Programming Language](/img/tr.png)
![[SIGGRAPH 2018] Moving Least Squares MPM with Compatible Particle-in-Cell](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8iyvhGF9f7o/mqdefault.jpg)
Hello Yuanming, if I have a system where all the particles in the whole domain are moving uniformly, I am wondering whether your MLS-MPM will be still much faster?
Another question is, I have some knowledge of the Particle-In-Cell approach, in this approach, the particles/parcels are numerical points, which means that they don't have physical size. Is this case in the MPM approach?
The last question is how about couping MPM approach with CFD fluid flow?
hello.
how do I get the effect on the last frame with the penetration of cubes?