Preview of The Great ‘I AM’ Revealed - NehemiasWall.com
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- In this Preview of "The Great I AM Revealed", Nehemia Gordon leaves Hebrew Masoretic manuscripts behind and goes back to the basics of the Hebrew language. In this study Nehemia explains how the ‘I AM’ passage in Exodus 3:14 teaches us the meaning of God's holy Name. We will see how the great ‘I AM’ was understood by ancient Jews and how this is the key to deciphering both the meaning of YHVH and its pronunciation. Lynell wrote: “Fascinating study on The Great 'I am' Revealed. Nehemia Gordon presents empirical evidence rather than theory concerning the name of God. He dispels myths and Facebook made-up Hebrew to reveal the name of Yehovah. Considerable evidence presented with logical thought make this a lecture not to be missed.”
Watch the full in-depth teaching:
www.nehemiaswa...
Subscribe to my RUclips Channel!
Subscribe to my Podcast: “Nehemia's Wall” on your favorite podcast app!
Subscribe to my Newsletter: www.nehemiaswa...
Follow me on Social Media:
Facebook: / nehemiagordon
RUclips: / ngordon4
Twitter: / ngordon4
Instagram: / nehemia_gordon
Google+: plus.google.co...
Donate: www.nehemiaswa...
YeHoVaH such a beautiful name! Thank you so much Nehemiah Gordon. May YeHoVaH bless you and keep you
That's not a name... you missed the whole point...
ALLELUYAH!!
Is always a WONDERFUL experience to know and understand deeply the truth of HIS word and HIS NAME!!!!
FATHER GOD KEEP BLESSING NEHEMIAH GORDON with knowledge, wisdom, And everything you need to fulfill in your BEAUTIFUL heart everything you want to know and share with us, because I know the love of FATHER YEHOVAH is in your heart for all PEOPLE.
Saw this live the end of February here in Houston. It was good, very informative thanks Nehemia!
THANK YOU BROTHER GORDON, MCNEESE,LA. IS WAITING FOR YOUR RETURN, WE SOUNDED, THE SHOFAR ,YOU AND I, THANK YOU FOR GIVING TO THE LORD-ADON YE HO VAH, YEHOVAH SHALL RAIN DOWN BLESSINGS OF SALVATION AND UNDERSTANDING TO THOSE WHO ARE SEEKING HIM. LET THE CALLED OUT ONES, BE READY TO RECEIVE HIS BLESSINGS. THEN SHARE WITH HIS CHILDREN, FOR HIS NAME SAKE, HE LEADETH ME IN PATHS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS FOR HIS NAME SAKE, LET US PRAY ONE FOR ANOTHER, FOR THE RESTORED KINGDOM OF YEHOVAH.
Now that we've had it proven- thank you Nehemiah and company- His Name is Yahovah, we must get out of the habit of calling Him "God". Commandment 3, Tho shalt not make My Name of no effect (vain).
I have spent the last 28 years teaching people that Gods name is Yehovah (Jehovah if in English) but for the most many people would tell us (JW's) that we do not know the name of God or that it is Yahwheh....
with all respect my friend, I speak to many JWs and we have great discussions with both sides trying to be respectful.
One thing I wish to share is that Yehovah is Yehovah in English or any other language. the Pharoah of Egypt used Yehovah when talking to the one we call moses, he did not translate or transliterate it.
All people will declare "blessed is he who comes in the name of Yehovah".
His name on His terms?
The Word not to bring his name to nothing doesn’t mean calling him God. It means not to swear falsely in his name or swear trivially.
Chuck West
I didn’t see where I posted otherwise... but I agree... there is one God of the Israelites
@@rickingraham136so yehovah means she is , because hovah means she is and hovah means calamity, disaster, and ruin?
Thank you Nehemiah for sharing this video. It helps me to understand the correct vocalization of the name of God which I am confused whether Yahweh or Yehovah is the correct vocalization.
Thank you brother. Shalom, from the mountains of western NC. 🖖
Can't wait to watch the entire teaching! Illustrating the errors of "Facebook hebrew" is in dire need.
I love listening to your fact finding research sir! “Thank you” is such a shallow adjective to say! It’s so much deeper than that.......
Blessings to all... in The Precious Name... Pray... He comes Quickly...
The Grt. I Am video was excellent, so glad you took the time to share this with us all.. thanks so much..
I would love for you to break down Zechariah 6:12 about the "BRANCH". Awesome video by the way.
Great!
TO GOD BE THE GLORY!!!
Just to be clear:ahyah,ahovah,ahyeh are the first person singular forms, And yhyah,.yhovah yhyeh are the 3rd person masculine neuter forms.. However the emphatic pronouns are more usually used for the present and perfect/past senses. Or rather the next to and in front of senses, with the behind or unknown future sense being the yod form.. in some dialects the Heath is so rough that the yod may also just be phonetically de-emphasised in the 3rd person form.❤️🤗
Great job teaching. Thank you
Incredibly important teaching ! Critical to anyone Really wanting to know God.. You've got to start any relationship by Knowing theyre/His name right?
Hey Mr.Gordon you are 100 percent right about Exodus 3 :14, that God is saying he is the past,the present,the future and how do we know this, Revelation 1:8 states -I am the Alʹpha and the O·meʹga says Jehovah God, “the One who is and who was and who is coming, the Almighty. New World Translation.
Jesus is the Lamb of The God of Abraham YHVH Yehovah Jehovah
Mark 16:8
In the Gospel of Mark.
If the women tell no one then, Who is !
What each Gospel story is about.
The four living creatures!
Matthew Who was!
Mark Who is!
Luke Who is Coming!
John The Lamb of YHVH!
The four gospels are associated with the four living creatures: Matthew, the man, Mark the lion, Luke the ox, and John the eagle. John has Jesus dying on a different day. It's the Day of Preparation, not the Day of Preparation for Passover. It was the day they prepared the lambs for sacrifice. While at the same time, Jesus is prepared for sacrifice. Jesus is the Lamb of YHVH Yehovah Jehovah
a man, a lion, an ox and an eagle. The man symbolises the prophet; the lion, kingship; the ox, priesthood, and the eagle, fatherhood.
Very Groovy!
And there you have it, Thank You
Nehemiah, why do you not add the word Elohim after these words to complete the sentence
Brilliant
Awesome! That was rad!
amazing, thanks for this Nehemia... Hey I noticed Hebrew Matthew it's Yeshua, also John... but Hebrew Revelations (vatican junk drawer) it's the longer "Yehoshua"... Why the difference? Is it that the copy is a different time period? Is the writer making a more obvious link to his names meaning Yehova saves? or do you have any thoughts on why the differences? We are talking about the same writer, Yehochanan
Aaron Kelly it's he saves instead of yehovah saves, I would assume some changes to the name yehoshua were made based on the idea that Jesus is God, an attempt to mix the meanings up and promote Jesus as savour, in reality the name Jesus means yihovah saves
Jolly Yeholiver thanks for your reply, I believe Yoshia means “he will save”, Yeshua is a shortened form of Yehoshua, and means Yehova saves... but hopefully Nehemiah will see my question and reply
Yehoshua is a play on Joshua... the prophet ljke unto Moses that leads the people into Israel. Revelation is structured like Joshua and entirely typoligical of the end times as well. He pulled a Moses role in the 1st coming. Not Moses only, but providing example.
Whether thats why or not i can only offer a speculation. Regardless, John was mystical like that and highly stylized both works with specific design details with numbers and names.
Garland Jones yes, because the son of Nun's name Hoshia means salvation, when Moshe changed his name to Yehoshua, Moshe changed his name from "salvation" to "salvation", YeHoVaH saves
@@slipstream4572 excellent observance
Brother Nehemiah,
The meaning of
EHEYEH = אהיה =
I WILL BE.
So why the scholars still call Him, I AM which in Hebrew is, אני or אנוכי ?
Incredible!
Jews through all ages knew the meaning of God's name: it is "He will be, is, was" or somewhat more accurately "He shall prove to be as he is and was". This is no secret and Jewish people freely speak of its meaning, as there is no rabbinical ban on speaking about it. The ban only applies to its pronunciation . It is even incorporated into one of the most famous and beautiful Jewish hymns "ADON OLAM", and Jewish children learn the words from early on. One line reads "v'hu hayAH v'hu HOVeh v'hu Yih'yeh b'tif'arah" (And he was, and he is, and he will be in glory). The name is formed by taking a part of each of the three tenses of the verb "to be", so the name is actually a contraction of the three, Y+HV+H. The pronunciation is Y'HOVAH for some Y'HOWAH
The one who was who is and will be. The alpha and omega the beginning and the end. The pierced one, who will be seen coming in the clouds. It's Jesus.
Jesus is the Lamb of The God of Abraham YHVH Yehovah Jehovah
Mark 16:8
In the Gospel of Mark.
If the women tell no one then, Who is !
What each Gospel story is about.
The four living creatures!
Matthew Who was!
Mark Who is!
Luke Who is Coming!
John The Lamb of YHVH!
The four gospels are associated with the four living creatures: Matthew, the man, Mark the lion, Luke the ox, and John the eagle. John has Jesus dying on a different day. It's the Day of Preparation, not the Day of Preparation for Passover. It was the day they prepared the lambs for sacrifice. While at the same time, Jesus is prepared for sacrifice. Jesus is the Lamb of YHVH Yehovah Jehovah
a man, a lion, an ox and an eagle. The man symbolises the prophet; the lion, kingship; the ox, priesthood, and the eagle, fatherhood.
Jesus is the Lamb of Jehovah God
John 10:11 “I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd gives His life for the sheep.
Revelation 7:17 because the Lamb, who is in the midst of the throne, will shepherd them and will guide them to springs of waters of life. And God will wipe out every tear from their eyes.”
Revelation 17:14 These will battle with the Lamb, but because he is Lord of lords and King of kings, the Lamb will conquer them. Also, those with him who are called and chosen and faithful will do so.”
Revelation 19:15...Moreover, he treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. 16 On his outer garment, yes, on his thigh, he has a name written, King of kings and Lord of lords.
So would you say Nehemia that translating " I am" at Ex 3:14 is not what was intended ?
This was dope!
Would the pronunciation sound any different in Aramaic?
Another good and informative video about the divine name Yehovah. Would be good to elaborate about how "I AM" is a very bad translation as the Hebrew "Ayer Asher Ayer" is more accurately translated as "I will be" You can see this two verses earlier in Ex 3:12 where Ayer is translated as "I will" and NOT as "I am" The Jesus is God believers will mistakenly try to tie in the erroneous "I am" at Ex 3:14 and try to link it to John 8:58 where Jesus said "Ego-Eimi" (I am) in answer to a question about his age.
By the way, if my memory serves me correct, there are NO capitals in the ancient Hebrew so less reason to capitalise the inaccurate I AM in Ex 3:14
Terry Flores Phillipians 2 v 5-11
@@apokalypse7777 Thanks for that, Phill 2 that Jesus gave no consideration thst he should be equal to God, so this proves that God is greater then Jesus, which is what Jesus himself said "the father is greater than I am"
Question to JWs?? Please could you explain. John 20 v 24-25. How many nails were in Jesus hands???
Because in Every bible version it is Nails, i.e. Plural???
Some have tried to use the plural "nails" in Jn 20:25 as evidence that Jesus was hung on a cross is to force their own presupposition onto the text. Yet to do this they must completely ignore all logical alternatives and more importantly they must ignore the explicit statements of Scripture.
First, the Bible explicitly states that Jesus was hung on a STAUROS or XYLON. According to Greek dictionaries these words ALWAYS denote a stake or pole:
"Both words disagree with the modern idea of a cross...The stauros was simply an upright pale or stake...Stauroo never means two pieces of wood joining each other at any angle. Even the Latin word crux means a mere stake." --A Critical Lexicon, E.W.Bullinger
"There is not a single sentence in the New testament, which, in the original Greek, bears even indirect evidence to the effect that the stauros used in the case of Jesus was other than one piece of timber. It is not a little misleading upon the part of our teachers to translate the word stauros as "cross"...honesty demands that we should no longer translate as "cross" a word which at the time our Gospels were written did not necessarily signify something cross-shaped. And it is equally incumbent upon us, from a moral point of view, that we should cease to render as "crucify" or "crucified" words which never bore any such meaning."
W.E.Vines Expository Dictionary says: "STAUROS....denotes, primarily, an upright pale or stake. ...originally to be distinguished from the ecclesiastical form of a two beamed cross...By the middle of the 3rd cent. A.D. the churches had either DEPARTED FROM, OR HAD TRAVESTIED, certain doctrines of the Christian faith...pagans were permitted largely to retain their pagan signs and symbols."
So, using the plural "nails" to claim that Jesus was hung on a cross would be to contradict the explicit teaching of the bible. Witnesses teach the explicit biblical statements that Jesus was hung on a "stake." Teaching that he was hung on a cross is absolutely unbiblical.
Also, Witnesses are not dogmatic about how many nails were used in the arms. Two could have been used. In fact, there is actually archeological evidence that four nails could have been used, two in the hands placed on both sides of a stake and two similarly in the feet. This was pointed out in a WT article: w87 8/15 (The archaeological evidence was of an leg bone with one nail stuck *sideways* into the ankle. Israel Exploration Journal 1985, Volume 35, pages 22-7). Historical facts show that the Romans often put individuals to death on posts having no crossbars.
Further, grammatically the plural "nails" could have meant a nail through each hand, or might have simply included both nail prints in ‘his hands and his feet.' Thomas' use of the plural “nails” does not have to be understood as a precise description indicating that each of Jesus' hands was pierced by a separate nail. In Luke 24:39 Jesus said: "See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself." This suggests that Christ's feet also were nailed. Since Thomas made no mention of nail prints in Jesus' feet, his use of the plural "nail's" could have been a general reference to multiple nails used in impaling Jesus.
The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia says: “The exact number of nails used . . . has been the subject of considerable speculation. In the earliest depictions of the crucifixion Jesus’ feet are shown separately nailed, but in later ones they are crossed and affixed to the upright with one nail.”
The Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, by M’Clintock and Strong, comments: “Much time and trouble have been wasted in disputing as to whether three or four nails were used in fastening the Lord. “-Volume II, page 580.
Claiming that two nails in the arms MUST mean crucifixion on a cross is to illogically force our favored interpretation while ignoring the evidence for other conclusions. This is a fallacious form of reasoning and eisogesis.
So, Thomas' statement cannot be used to show the Jesus was executed upon a cross, since it is just as reasonable to believe Christ was impaled to a stake with a separate nail in each arm.
What is the most important thing for Christians is how the Cross was introduced into Christianity. Notice again that the above quote from Vine’s Dictionary says that the cross was adopted after the church had “either DEPARTED FROM, OR HAD TRAVESTIED, certain doctrines of the Christian faith...pagans were permitted largely to retain their pagan signs and symbols."
The cross had been used in Babylonian, Egyptian, Greek and Roman paganism for centuries. It was a common emblem in sun worship. The adoption of the cross into Christianity can be traced directly to the Roman Emperor Constantine three hundred years after Christ. Constantine was not a “Christian” when he saw a vision of a cross which he adopted as his victory sign. Rather he was still a Sun-God worshiper at the head of an army of Sun-God worshipers. Although he later mandated this corrupted form of "Christianity" as the national religion, he was not converted until his death.
So the use of the cross was a not a tradition from God, but a corruption of true Christianity. This is proven by solid evidence from history and archaeology:
"The universal use of the sign of the cross makes more poignant the striking lack of crosses in early Christian remains. Most scholars now agree that the cross, as an artistic reference to the passion event, cannot be found prior to the time of Constantine."--Evidence of Church Life Before Constantine (1985), by Professor Graydon F. Snyder
Two hundred years after Christ the Christian writer Minucius Felix wrote to the pagans in Octavius and revealed the attitude that early Christians had toward the cross up to that time: "Crosses, moreover, we neither worship nor wish for. You, indeed, who consecrate gods of wood, adore wooden crosses perhaps as parts of your gods. . . . Your victorious trophies not only imitate the appearance of a simple cross, but also that of a man affixed to it." (The Ante- Nicene Fathers, Vol. 4, p. 191)
Notice, that this early church father said that Christians did not have crosses and never thought of having one. Only pagans at that time used it.
The apostate Christianity that arose several hundred years after Christ decided to adopt the pagan symbol for the god Tammuz and use it for worship in their religion. When the Bible was translated into modern languages the mistranslation of "cross" was inserted because of Roman Catholic tradition.
Should Christians venerate such a symbol as pagans have in the past? The Scriptures are clear as to what True worshipers are to do with sacred objects from false religion. Does it say: "Adopt them and change their meaning"?
2 Cor.6:14-18: "Do not link up with unbelievers and try to work with them...What business can a believer have with an unbeliever? What agreement can we have with idols? That is why the Lord has said, ‘Leave them; separate yourselves from them; DON'T TOUCH THEIR FILTHY THINGS, and I will welcome you, and you shall be my sons and daughters.'"-NLT (Cf. Deut. 12:30,31, Ex. 20:4,5, 1 Cor.10:14; Ex.20:4,5.)
God does not tolerate mixing of idolatrous practices with true worship, as is illustrated by his condemnation of calf worship, even though the Israelites said they were still worshiping the True God. (Ex 32:3-10) defendingjehovahswitnesses.blogspot.com/2013/08/jehovah-witnesses-why-does-it-say.html?m=1
synopsa.pl/semantyka-greckiego-slowa-%cf%83%cf%84%ce%b1%cf%85%cf%81%cf%8c%cf%82-stauros/
The Bible does not say how many....it says "So the other disciples told him, "We have seen the Lord!" But he said to them, "Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe." NOTICE he says "NAIL" marks , and does not say how many were used....it could have been "ONE NAIL" with Jesus hands crossed over each other......unless you were there you will never know !
@@thambone30 Good point !
@@STROND If your using the new world translation maybe. But every other Greek manuscript has plural for Nails..
Please see this, and then explain..
◄ ἥλων ►
Englishman's Concordance
ἥλων (hēlōn) - 2 Occurrences
John 20:25 N-GMP
GRK: τύπον τῶν ἥλων καὶ βάλω
NAS: the imprint of the nails, and put
KJV: hands the print of the nails, and put
INT: mark of the nails and put
John 20:25 N-GMP
GRK: τύπον τῶν ἥλων καὶ βάλω
NAS: into the place of the nails, and put
KJV: the print of the nails, and
INT: mark of the nails and put
Interlinear Greek • Interlinear Hebrew • Strong's Numbers • Englishman's Greek Concordance • Englishman's Hebrew
Concordance • Parallel Texts
Concordance Entries
Strong's Greek 2247
2 Occurrences
ἥλων - 2 Occ.
Additional Entries
Ἠλίου - 2 Occ.
ἡλικίᾳ - 2 Occ.
ἡλικίαν - 4 Occ.
ἡλικίας - 2 Occ.
ἡλίκην - 1 Occ.
ἡλίκον - 2 Occ.
ἡλίῳ - 2 Occ.
ἥλιον - 4 Occ
ἥλιος - 14 Occ.
ἡλίου - 12 Occ.
ἡμέρᾳ - 108 Occ.
ἡμέραι - 26 Occ.
ἡμέραις - 49 Occ.
ἡμέραν - 58 Occ.
ἡμέρας - 127 Occ.
ἡμερῶν - 22 Occ.
ἡμετέρα - 1 Occ.
ἡμετέραις - 1 Occ.
ἡμετέραν - 1 Occ.
ἡμετέρας - 1 Occ.
Englishman's Concordance.
@@STROND The word for nails appears twice in the passage, where Thomas is speaking.
The Greek word is Halon, it is masculine PLURAL tense, not singular.
Please check this out.
Then could you please Provide your source references, Codex sinaiticus, or Vaticanus etc etc
2247 [e] ἥλων
hēlōn nails, N-GMP
What is the causative conjugation of “to be”?
Hiphil Paradigm Verb used in text books is גלה
יַגְלֶה would become יַהְוֶה
WOW WHAT A BRILLIANT REVELATION, YES I AM SHOUTING IN MY HEAD.
Gods name is not just one word,IT`S AN ACROSTIC, made up of three words. YEHOVAH = Y,HO,VAH. For christians its similar to
ICHTUS. I=ISOOS, CH=CHRISTOS, T=THEOO, U= UIOS, S=SOTAYER. JESUS CHRIST GODS SON SAVIOUR. ABSOFLIPPINLUTELY BRILLIANT. PRAISE GOD.
You want a real mind party, look up what the word pictures of YHWH mean
Theo Megawerty I will, do you have a link to a good source for that??
Waow! Impressive...hebrew likes Acronym !
YHWH is just an acronym.
yes and it's not a name.... like apologists want us to think...
Yehovah or Yihovah?
So when the writer of the book of Hebrews (13:8) says "Jesus Christ the same yesterday, today and forever," the Jews would immediately understand that he was saying Jesus IS YeHoVaH!
Hebrews 13:8 Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today, and forever. 9 Do not be led astray by various and strange teachings,
Do you see a difference in Christ the Son of the Living God vs Jesus is God in the Flesh. There are two teachings The Spirit of Error and The Spirit of Truth.
Matthew 16:20 Then he sternly instructed the disciples not to tell anybody that he was the Christ.
The Spirit of Error teaches Jesus is God who came in the flesh.
2 John 1:7 For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those not acknowledging Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist.
The Spirit of Truth teaches Jesus Christ came in the flesh.
Matthew 16:16 Simon Peter answered: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” 17 In response Jesus said to him: “Happy you are, Simon son of Joʹnah, because flesh and blood did not reveal it to you, but my Father in the heavens did. 18 Also, I say to you: You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my congregation, and the gates of the Grave will not overpower it. 19 I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of the heavens, and whatever you may bind on earth will already be bound in the heavens, and whatever you may loosen on earth will already be loosened in the heavens.” 20 Then he sternly instructed the disciples not to tell anybody that he was the Christ.
Ok, but isn't it backwards?
as the waters cover the sea.......
So the declension forms for the verb are the letters in YHWH. And again Ehyeh is YHWH, so the yod in Yihyeh, that is the He in He will be is YHWH. . And finally the hwh is the emphatic he is , and the Hyh is the emphatic he was. .
If we concretise these distinctions in Hebrew thought: he is in front of you, he is besides you and he is behind you. .
In John 1 Elohim,He beside you emphatically the Word was! The word was and is and will be Elohim exact representative, here on earth as Yshuah and on every planet in every star system throughout the known universe as the Word
jehovajah Phillipians 2 v 5-11.
It is in my mind that the Israelites never used the Great "I AM" that the Christians use in the new testament to try to proclaim that "Jesus" is "God in the flesh" because he said "I AM".
Yehovah said that to Moshe 2 times before giving the full name Yehovah. I have never found an instance of the Israelites using the "I AM" instead of Yehovah.
Hoping I am correct?
If you watch the whole teaching he explains why the translation says "I AM"...Essentially "I AM" and "I will Be" are the same in Hebrew and he talks about something called the "imperfect" in grammar.
Still, you may be right. However, is it not Jewish tradition to speak the first part of a passage to convey the whole passage? So when Jesus says "Before Abraham was, I AM" or "Before Abraham was, Ehyeh" or in Greek "Before Abraham was, Ego eimi"..He was speaking the first part of verse 3:14 and claiming Himself to be Yehovah. In fact those who heard Him picked up rocks to stone Him...they knew exactly what He meant and it eventually got Him crucified.
Later, He is literally referred to as the One "Who was, Who is, and is to come". What does "I will be" and "HE will be" mean? It seems obvious to me. "I am he, that I was, and in the future will be"...Jesus said the words "so you will know that I Am He" several times. Again, saying those words and referring to Himself that way got Him crucified because they all knew what He was saying, and they counted it as blasphemy.
My point being, He likely referred to the first part of the verse knowing who His audience was...which was customary to do anyway. Remember, he often spoke in parables and was deliberately cryptic. But, that is a whole other discussion...it's pretty fascinating, why He would do that though.
There are alot more than the 7 specific I AM claims to point to Jesus being YHVH. Thats just a plain fact in thats the sense of how each Gospel writer and Paul taught him. Jesus claims this himself CONSTANTLY but its way more subtle unless youre extremely familar with old testament. Theres a reason the Pharisees try to stone him every time he does that. They always understand what hes doing too and the text points that out.
@@garlandjones7709
the son is not the father
he didnt father himself
the son said so many times
he didnt pray to himself in the garden, he didnt commend his spirit to himself, and he doesnt sit at his own right side
@@rickingraham136 the son is not the father....correct. he still directly claimed to be YHVH explicitly.
@@rickingraham136 there are two very easy ways to demonstrate this. I think the crux of the issue you have is the same as 99pct of others have, and that is what you think in your mind he is calling the Father.
Ok so why does the Bible say Jehovah in some places and others YHWH? That leads me to believe YHWH is a different name. I don't know Hebrew, I'm just trying to understand. I've been taught YHWH is Yahweh. And which is it YHWH or YHVH? Is one Yahweh and the other Yehovah?
kabelo mogorosi
It’s Yehovah (YHVH). YHWH is based on the Arabic influence on Hebrew. Yahweh is possibly the name of an Egyptian god (proposed by the one who introduced the name - Gesenius) and the name came from Greek sources and other pagan sources. Yehovah is based solely on Hebrew sources, and there’s no ancient Hebrew source supporting Yahweh, only modern sources pointing to the pagan sources and Gesenius.
YHWH / NIN' is Jesus
🌈❤️🌈 ES-Jeremías /EN-Jeremiah / NL-Jeremías / FR-Jérémie
ES-Jeremías 31:10 “Oíd palabra de Jehová, oh naciones, y hacedlo saber en las costas que están lejos, y decid: ‘El que esparció a Israel lo reunirá y guardará, como el pastor a su rebaño’.”
EN-Jeremiah 31:10 “Hear the word of the Lord, you nations; proclaim it in distant coastlands: ‘He who scattered Israel will gather them and will watch over his flock like a shepherd’.”
NL-Jeremia 31:10 “Hoort het woord des Heren, gij natiën;
Verkondigt het in verre kustlanden: ‘Hij die Israël verstrooide, zal ze verzamelen en zal over zijn kudde waken als een herder. '
FR-Jérémie 31:10 “Écoutez la parole l’Eternel, vous les nations; Et proclamez-la dans des régions côtières éloignées: ‘Celui qui a dispersé Israël les rassemblera et veillera sur son troupeau comme un berger’.”
Is this transliterated wrong?
So God said to Moses: “I Will Become What I Choose to Become.”
Yes it is.. YHVH Is the four consonants known as the tetragrammaton..
God told Moses in Exodus 3 v 15 What to say to the Israelites, when he went back to egypt..
The tetragrammaton is made up of 4 Hebrew consonants, YUD, HAY, VAV, HAY.
It is the vowel points that give the correct pronounciation.
I must tell you that Nehemiah and his team, have found the True pronounciation of Gods name, with the correct vowel points, in over 2,000 ancient Hebrew manuscripts.
Yes that`s 2,000.
It is in the old testament over 6,000 times.
It is correctly pronouced as YEHOVAH.
The vowels are not as some people say taken from ADONAI.
ADONAI just means Lord or sovereign.
The Jehovahs witnesses have promoted the name of God for well over 100 years, but the first letter is a Y and not a J, The J is basically a Germanic derivative.
Spanish is like that too. If there is a group of people it falls to masculine.
So Yehovah is a female name since hovah means she is and it means calamity, disaster, and ruin from hebrew strongs 1943?
the name is a contraction
of three statements
(he who will be) yihyeh -ye
(he who is) hoveh -hov
(he who was) hayah - ah
Ye'hov'ah.
he said that hoveh means he is
hovah means she is (not destruction)
hovah part of Yehovah
is not from hovah (she is)
its from the contraction
of hoveh and hayah
(he who is + he who was)
Bello
Dobre - Toruń
It's amazing that God's Name could be eliminated with such malice by both the
Christian and Jewish Religious Leaders for the purpose of supporting their
superstitions and dogmas such as the Trinity.
As Nehemiah has mentioned in earlier videos , the most common name found
in the Bible by far is Yehovah / Jehovah , which was found in over 7000 places..
It's no wonder Nehemiah has refered to it as a conspiracy , since that's exactly what
it is. It takes an incredible effort of manipulation , deception , dishonesty and deceit
to accomplish such a feat as eliminating the Name of The God of the Bible.
And yet , we can find 10,000's names of false gods named after frogs , fish ,
cows , lightning and so forth , but not the only Almighty God who pronounced
his name as Yehovah for eternity,
Throughout History , both Jews and Christians silenced those that claimed that God;s
Name was Yehovah / Jehovah and branded them as heretics and silenced them
with threats of death or death itself.
Geo Bla Phllipians 2 v 5-11
Philippians 2:11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
Malachi 2:10 “Do we not all have one father? Was it not one God who created us? So why do we deal treacherously with one another.
John 6:44 No man can come to me unless the Father, who sent me, draws him, and I will resurrect him on the last day. 45 It is written in the Prophets: ‘They will all be taught by Jehovah.’ Everyone who has listened to the Father and has learned comes to me. 46 Not that any man has seen the Father, except the one who is from God; this one has seen the Father. 47 Most truly I say to you, whoever believes has everlasting life.
The Mind of Christ
(Isaiah 52:13-15)Philippians 2 v 5-11
5Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus:
6Who, existing in the form of YEHOVAH.
did not consider equality with YEHOVAH
something to be grasped,
7but emptied Himself,
taking the form of a servant,
being made in human likeness.
8And being found in appearance as a man,
He humbled Himself
and became obedient to death-
even death on a cross.
9Therefore God exalted Him to the highest place
and gave Him the name above all names,
10that at the name of Jesus/YESHUA every knee should bow,
in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11and every tongue confess that Jesus/ YESHUA Christ is Lord,
to the glory of YEHOVAH the Father.
You may have heard commentaries from Jewish Rabbis and ran off with a little something (which is good), but, you still have no idea what you're talking about. Christianity and Judaism are two very opposed and highly different religions.
Nehemia Gordon snapped... the rubber band. With that kind of logic speaking only to the converted. Nonsense