Controversial Shooting After Officer Jumps on Suspect’s Truck
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
- Join for exclusive perks & members-only videos: / @mncrime
CONTACT US:
Complaints? Video submissions? Sponsorships? Collabs? Business inquiries? Email us - contact@mncrime.com
BE NICE:
The individuals in these videos may be suffering from the effects of alcohol, drug abuse, a mental health disorder or simply having a bad day. The videos should NOT be presumed to be representative of their general behavior and all individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.
ABOUT MN CRIME:
We're a multimedia public safety information network providing breaking and in-depth coverage around Minnesota. Through several social media channels, sophisticated media production, and years of collaborative research and reporting experience, MN CRIME is proud to provide the exclusive, high-quality content you need, wherever you are.
For more original reporting, visit our website:
www.MNCRIME.com
or Facebook:
/ crimemn
I never can understand why a cop would jump on a moving car
Until that guy in the moving vehicles goes and hurts someone and u are like ...why didn't they stop him???
@@frankmaunde9471they have no right to stop him. Why do you hate our rights? Maybe you should be locked up because you might hurt someone one day?
@@Jimbo0341usmcu complain about your rights but want to take away someone else's rights..Democrat
They're stunned, pretty simple
@@Jimbo0341usmc Dude, it is called a Traffic Stop. What do you mean they have no right to stop him? If you are on drugs, cops have every right and duty to stop you from driving a motor vehicle.
The cop put himself in a dangerous situation where when he absolutely didn’t have to
Yes their job is very dangerous.
@@briancleveland6115 yea but he put himself into that he could have not had to shoot him or put himself in that much trouble.
@@parkerrust7796Yes he applied for the job, and he shouldn't have got on the truck but the dude should have stopped.
He jumped on the moving vehicle of a subject who did not have a criminal claim against him.
@@briancleveland6115but he didn’t stop. Doesn’t mean the cop can just jump on his vehicle. Not like he’s saving a child or anything he’s just being dumb and reckless
If you don't suspect him of committing a crime why are you stalking him and following him
Ask his family
They got a call.
Exactly.
Because that is their M.O....
They ganged up on him, officer Brown got his ego hurt
I support good policing but this was not it, that cop should be charged
There was no reason to even call ahead for another cop to pull him over. It was a wellness check. He was alive and possibly a little cooky. The cops ramped this up unnecessarily. Shame on them.
Definitely escalated the situation. Multiple times. Then decides to jump on a moving vehicle. 🙄
I mean, the ignorant cop went as far as to question him about why his electricity was shut off. 🤷♂️
Should've comply just like ya love to say when the person is not white you can't have it both ways .smfh
Precisely .
And of course the cops “ investigated “ 🙄and found he did nothing wrong .
@@FranchescoGroyairr Your sentence structure proves what race YOU are. 😂
It honestly looks like the cop jumps up on the car when it starts moving. His partner sound like he was going to say get off.
100 % I was coming to make this comment but you know cops have to back each other if he would have actually said it it would have been acknowledging that what they were doing was wrong
He was on the step before he accelerated.
@@Cee-i4pwrong
He got on before it started moving.
@@howlinwulfYou should watch the video a little closer.
The second officer clearly escalated the situation
yeah fr. 1st officer was handling it decent, 2nd guy was too ready for conflict from it
A welfare check ended in the death of the person being checked on. The second officer escalated the situation. Unreal
oh ya he clearly stepped on the gas pedal to escalate that situation alright, the cop didnt make the best decisions but lets not create a victim where there isnt one
@@brucebiendarra9843 Welfare checks aren't always just because someone might be sick or missing. Many times, the person is experiencing a mental health crisis and/or is intoxicated, which poses a danger to themselves, the police, and the public. Especially in cases like this where that person drives off. It's unfortunate and sad that this man was shot, but he kidnapped a police officer by speeding off with him on his car and put that cop's life at risk. Had he not sped off or stopped to let the cop get off, he wouldn't have been shot. The cop is a victim who defended himself, don't twist the facts.
@@Vanderhoekx grow a brain cell and get a clue.
I don’t think they had a reason to stop him he’s an adult that didn’t commit a crime he doesn’t have to talk to the police
You dont have to talk to the police even if you do commit a crime. Its called the 5th amendment.
@@MikeSmith-ug3fg I didn’t word it correctly I did mean you don’t have to talk to the police even if you commit a crime but since there was no crime they shouldn’t of detained him at all
Definitely law enforcement overreach. Gun ho attitude
You guys obviously aren't paying attention...
Technically battery on a LEO when he hit him with the door. With that being said this is a mental health case that didn’t need to go like this. At no point should that deputy have jumped on the truck as he did. Mental health is a serious issue in the US and it needs to be addressed but this is not the way it needed to go. The officer if he believed he would be able to send the suspect for psychiatric treatment or evaluation should’ve never let him drive off; unfortunately, there isn’t enough training on mental health issues like this for LEO’s and these deputies messed it up.
No legal reason to stop him. He had no obligation to talk to the officer. And then when the officer did not want to take no for an answer he jumped on a moving vehicle.
That’s the way I see it. I’d like to know what crime he was suspected of that justified a detention.
@@burleman how they supposed to know before they investigate, you don't seem to understand how reality works.
@stevenmoore3480 They're supposed to investigate and then go after the person. Not stop everybody and force them to tell them what they know. That's not how it works in this country. You don't have to talk to the police ever. Even if you're arrested, you still don't have to talk to them.
We learn this in seventh grade. How do you not know that.
You're absolutely correct. Backup cost. The problem jeopardized his own safety and shots. Omebody because he made a lot of bad decisions. The cop needs to go to jail. His actions caused adaptive another person.
Not only that but even if he had a legit stop, why would you put yourself in that situation? Now you're in a moving vehicle with someone who doesn't want to be arrested.
At no point did the officers say “we want to make sure you are okay” or “we want to take care of this for you”. These rural cops are not prepared for stuff like this. And yeah, dude should not have jumped on the car. This was all completely unnecessary.
How about.... the cops had no right to attempt to deprive him of his liberty?
@@annpeerkat2020 Exactly!
"These rural cops"... No mate, all cops. If you want to improve welfare send a counsellor or ambo, cops look for crimes and often create them when there isn't one.
In my experience being a military police officer. I never in my life hung onto someone car if they drive off on me. The cops already knew where he lived and had his LP from his truck. The cop put his life in danger by holding on to the truck 🤦🏽♂️. I’m glad I changed my career path after I got out the military.
Both of those deputies have no business being in law enforcement
@@Sam11747 the first deputy was doing fine. He had been de-escalating and was trying to determine what if any intervention was needed.
I was thinking the same thing, it was preventable. The only thing I can think they (the state) said to justify it is he was a danger to society/himself so they HAD to act. I can see both sides but obviously I’d prefer they chose the option where no one was game over. (Trying to use RUclips friendly lingo) He wanted to be left alone and get some food. We will never know if he would’ve done that and gone home calmly. The idiot who jumped on a moving truck changed the trajectory of this case IMO.
well u avoided being war criminal working for military industrial complex not for ur country
Funny you say that. I was a Combat Engineer during those fun years after 9-11. When I left, local cops back home tried to recruit me, I declined stayed private.
To be fair, if two blurry ellipsoids came to live in my house, I would be extraordinarily freaked out.
SCP entities are people, too.
The guy doesn't remember them being there. It was all a blur.
😂
😂😂
Just going off of shape they definitely could all be related
"Can you guys maybe take off?" Says a cop to the people just being trespassed by an owner?
No wonder good folks can't decide on which side you on!
Exactly!! Everybody is over looking this very critical detail. Especially given that the officer just assumed the trespassers were a vetted source of factual information with no context whatsoever. That cop just took their word, even though the owner of the house told the cop that they were thief's and trespassing. If anything, the two he let go should have been detained. There's the probable cause of a crime, the two he let go. Not the house owner. It's absurd. And nobody even notices.
Disgusting how these passive-aggressive cops were toying with this poor man. Not giving him any clear instructions or reason why they were questioning him, just annoying him when he'd done nothing wrong, and escalating the situation. What gave the cop the right to jump on his vehicle? Was he under arrest? No! But clearly it's an offence for a driver to endanger the life of someone riding on your truck, so something had to be done. What a tragic loss of life for that poor old man who had offended nobody and should have been left alone in peace. The fact the cop was not disciplined is disgraceful, he escalated a peaceful situation into a fatal shooting.
Cop should be in jail. It's disgusting what he fid to this poor old man
Cops can't fix someone like that. All they did was antagonize him
Exactly…. Cops think they can fix a broken family!
That's what they do. Welfare Check huh? Great way to show consideration for someone's well being!
@@clucier1 That's on the daughter. A welfare check was unwarranted because she knew he was ok since she was there. I wonder if she made up that story about her Dad to force the cops to show up? They would not have come to resolve plain old family drama with no violence. I'd be angry too if I was him.
@@clucier1 You are a very confused person.
Being an arsehole isn't a crime.
1. No probable cause for a stop.
2. Don't jump onto a moving vehicle and put yourself in a situation where you have to shoot.
Both these cops need some serious re training
They need JAIL TIME
*fired
No probable cause? Is your last name Magoo?
@@chriskiefer7493do you even understand what constitutes probable cause?
Jail needs
Only a fool would've climbed on that truck.
Exactly!
and the cop lied to
COPS should know by now not to jump on cars after multiple COPS have been killed doing so..SMH
There's a reason they're in those clown suits.
How can they justify their officer jumping on the side of the truck of a man not suspected of any crime and killing him because the officer decided to do the most unreasonable thing and killed a man for it.
Where are yall when they do this to a black person?
@@Ghostface944cause blacks guilty
The driver chose to put the officer in danger. No different than if the officer stood in front of the vehicle and driver attempted to run over him.
@@Ghostface944race has nothing to do with it. You’re a lost cause
They wanted to shoot their guns... Probably can't find anything else to shoot with.
That guy should not be a cop, and he should be criminally charged. He violated every piece of training and policy given to him. His puking shows he knows he f’d up bad.
1000%
The way that guy reacted to the whole situation makes it clear he doesn't have the temperament to be a cop.
He was looking for a reason from the moment he pulled up… The fact that they found his actions justified, is a testament to just how bad the system has fallen… God help us all, if this is protecting and serving….
I agree
He can still face a civil lawsuit
These cops murdered a man due to their own incompetence.
One cop. It wasn't his "stop." He pulled it over for the other. That's all. He should not have had any dialogue with the driver. It was obvious he didn't know what the matter was. A back up unit stays quiet and merely observes. Period. Cops should not create deadly force encounters.
No.. It was due to their egos...
Just obey the police you hired to maintain order. No problem.
he has the right to remain silent who cares if he just wants to talk with him
Cops' escalated that... and broke at least four of his civil rights. 😮
It's america you don't have any rights
I don’t know which is more sad, that you don’t understand what civil rights are or the fact that this gentleman has so many rights that he has the right to be crazy however that does have consequences
@jasonmcmillan6598he broke no laws. No reasons for escalation whatsoever.
@@PhillipFelix-kw3zi 1) terroristic threats, disorderly conduct, resisting/obstructing, kidnapping, reckless driving, reckless endangerment. All of these potential charges were listed in the investigation of the shooting
If you do a welfare check and end up killing whomever you were supposed to be helping, then you deserve jail time.
The fact they cut out the witness reporting and talking about the situation. It’s clearly the officers fault.
Le blesser aurait suffit
It happens a lot.
@@elmooncrack6963 Yes
They accidentally reversed the syllables
" fare well" check.
I fixed it for everyone
that deputy's not the brightest spoon in the shed
Real talk how many spoons are in your shed?
@@Liluziburt69 great question.. im also curious...
they allowed a special needs person to police
The brightness attracts the bugs and animals. The more you know....
@@Liluziburt69facts I see some people in comment defending the suspect
Don't you have a right to be angry and crazy at your own house lol? He wasn't hurting anyone else
Exactly what I’m thinking
That's not what he got shot for if you didn't watch. He was on a traffic stop, and you can't just flee from those when you feel like it.
@@calebb231 He wasn't on a traffic stop. The cops can NOT force anyone to talk to them.
@calebb231 was he being detained? If so, for what reason?
@@calebb231 I'm talking about why the cop was therein the first place. Get on the same page. no one is talking about the illegal stop
The police was way too aggressive on a matter that did not need to escalate into a shooting.
There was no aggression on the cops part before he had to shoot him. Actually watch the video next time.
@@shanetrent8799 Read policy and procedure and learn the laws about LAWFUL detainments. YOU need to educate yourself instead of being a SHEEP and always thinking the COPS are in the right. Back the Blue til it happens to you!
Maybe try to nail down grammar and proper sentence structure before you tackle Nationwide justice reform.
Knucklehead, ask your mummy if you can leave the basement, there's another world out there called reality.
Police abuse of power nothing new .
Imagine you had that power to maybe stop a boyfriend or girlfriend from LEGALLY driving away being allowed by law then held later as prisoner on the side of the road to be what ? Reprimanded vocally the claims to the welfare is none existent at the point in him driving away he show genuine panicking and disparity however not a sure reason to arrest.
Police abuse of power and excessive force by far is showing you tell me
He doesn't have to explain nothing to the cops. What crime? What violation? Seems to me the cops were the only ones breaking the law.. "He took off with me on the vehicle" GIANT LIE!!! All he had to do was step back and let him go
Only call the cops if you're okay with them un-aliving your family member, the daughter is to blame. Never call the cops on your own family like that, she's an adult, it's time for her to move out of daddy's house and pay her own bills.
It's almost like a free hit.
we don’t know a TON of background here. I DO think that the 2nd officer should not have hung onto the vehicle. The mental health system is a broken one. I WONDER if the decedent caused the fire that killed his parents? We don’t know that. I’m just curious. What they DID say is that he was spiraling out worse and worse. Using hard drugs. Paranoid. He was a ticking time bomb. That said, by HIS OWN actions (driving away from when he was detained INITIALLY-that started the whole thing, being pulled over, etc.) pulling away a SECOND time.. he caused his own demise. The police saved his remaining family and community from any future harm. And THAT’S the duty of law enforcement. To protect and serve the public. They did that, CASE CLOSED.
@@paulc-xj9ck Right? It's like if you want someone out of your life forever, just call in a welfare check on them.
Officer never should attached yourself to the vehicle
It IS ok to drive with someone on your vehicle, it's entrapment or something. Like when a protestor sits in the road and people said that was equivalent to false imprisonment, and everyone KNOWS vehicles are less violent than guns.
Cop has no right to do any of this to this man. This is disgusting
Agreed
They investigated and found no wrong doing...
That doesn't make it right
@@nathanchrist4831 If it isn't wrong, then it must be right.. Right?...
Terribly handled.
I agree. The driver should not have disregarded the officer and taken off with the cop on the side. Good point. Its still amazing that some people think that not complying with police will have a positive outcome.
@@Greghh1960bootlicker
@@Greghh1960 sad little boot licker…..I am a retired cop and even I can see how wrong this is….
your truly pathetic
PS: we as cops don’t like bootlickers like you and your pathetic ilk anymore than the regular public does…..your truly truly pathetic
Exactly!
@@Greghh1960 Your intelligence is protruding just past the level of your big toe
I agree with many here. It was not necessary to jump on the truck. He was not a wanted Fugitive or threat to the public. Disfunctional family yes, that applies to probably 20% of America.
More like 70% but yes.
Do not talk to cops. I will say it again, '' Do not talk to cops"
@@diegomonti1751 exactly!
says the felon
@@scootar097 says the bootlicker.
@@scootar097 says the bootlicker.
@@scootar097 how does that leather taste?
Remember people, this is what happens to your so-called loved ones if you call in a welfare check to the police.
Actually, a relative called a welfare check on me two days after my mom died, and I spoke with the officer for several minutes explaining the situation with him. The cop left, I went back to my nap.
jrambo7495 is right. Why would you call armed agents of the state to a loved ones home, specially if your loved one is not thinking straight, they have no obligation to protect the loved one, officer safety comes first always. About 90% of these welfare checks on mental illness people go horribly wrong.
@@chuckb3489 "About 90% of these welfare checks on mental illness people go horribly wrong." Can you please cite where that statistic came from? You make me feel like I'm one of the lucky "10%" who was not shot! 😂
@@chuckb3489 Conditioning, probably. Defer the problem to the state. Sometimes those interviews end up in gun fire, though, and it might be more tragic if it happened to some innocent caretakers.
@@vladimirputindreadlockrast812
According to an A.I. search, a Washington Post investigation found that between 2019 and 2021, there were at least 178 cases where law enforcement officers killed people they were called to assist during welfare checks. These cases involved people who were not reported to be an immediate threat to others. Why would you even chance it? You were extremely lucky that day.
How did his daughter know all that about someone she hasn't been in contact with for 2 years?
She wanted his stuff and wanted him gone is my guess. Squatters maybe?
Video says last contact was December 2022 and the bodycam timestamp is June 2023 so it was 6 months
@@77InfidelNo, she was crying. They said he had been mentally deteriorating. She was worried about her dad. He had become reclusive because of the loss of his parents in a fire and drug use.
Exactly!!! These guys just went ahead and listened to everybody else, including the trespassing thieves he let go, and didn't show any concern for the actual victim of a crime, the home owner himself. You can vent and yell and be angry all you want on private property, as long as nobody is being abused or complains about the noise. This whole situation was deplorable. That cop should be behind bars.
@-youtalkingtome For some reason, my comment was removed. That was my take on it. You may be right. Sometimes people can only take so much or reach a breaking point. I feel that this whole thing was handled very poorly. I stated that maybe they wanted him gone. Cops knew who he was, where he lived. My original post stated that I removed my side steps when I purchased a used truck. I still "stand" by that statement. Meaning a cop couldn't stand on my truck and execute me. This isn't being smart towards you, but to give others reading a bit of context. Thank you and take care.
first dont jump on a moving car
I've seen a couple news stories where some man's daughter calls the cops on her dad for no reason and he ends up getting killed. Hope his daughter remembers every day for the rest of her life she caused this.
Probably does, as she enjoys dad's farm. This incident tells us the daughter hadn't seen dad for several years, but turned up to try and have him committed.
💯
I think by all I have seen you’re right. I still think it’s dementia.
She caused this? Asking for a welfare check for a paranoid addict? Where a cop decided to stupidly escalate this wayyy beyond what was needed and put himself in danger? The daughter has absolutely no responsibility for this and you’re a clown for even suggesting it.
@@Alex-co7cq she didn't care about him, they hadn't seen eachother in years. He had his house, you can see his truck is clean, not indicative of someone in need of a welfare check.
The man was under no obligation to stay there just because they wanted to talk to him. That cop should be facing charges.
Wrong
Agree
Wrong. You can’t just leave when you’re detained.
Detained for what crime?
Yeah it's well known in every law book and every ancient tomb and scroll of law that if a police officer is investigating you for any reason, you have the right given by God and all intelligent life in the known cosmos to leave. Now full disclosure to be fair and balanced, there have been rumors that obstruction, resisting, interfering, fleeing, and eluding are sort of like, not technically illegal of course but sort of frowned upon or breaking a light social taboo of sorts.
Of course these can't be a crime because as stated in the most ancient of legal lore, you have the right to disengage and leave no matter what the so called "officer" says, and especially if the so called "law enforcement" says they are investigating a crime or checking on the welfare of someone. How do we even know these "officers" are even real law enforcement? Anyone can identify themselves as law enforcement, anyone can get a police car or badge off TEMU.
They should have been contacted by a JUDGE, the president, AND the secretary of defense showing video footage locked behind no less than 5 layers of encryption of the officer being sworn in and officially being given authority by the state. Without this you have the right to deem these "police" as fake kidnappers who can be left or fought in self defense.
Besides, it was clearly stated that this innocent man was not against the law, and it was clearly stated that the so called "cops" are against the law.
This all stated because he “just wanted to talk to the guy” then there was a traffic stop because he “just wanted to talk to the guy”
No, this all started as a mental health call, in which the officer had to determine the status of the individual, and if he was a threat to himself or others
@@valerierodger Its not illegal to be mentally ill and police can't detain someone because of it. Police can investigate a mental health crisis but if that individual is not being violent and if they haven't made any threats then they literally can not do anything and cannot detain someone just because they suspect they may have a mental illness. You can't force a deranged person to get help and cops had no right to detain the guy.
@@valerierodger Did the officer establish anything? No, he did not.
Was there any indication the man was a threat? No, there was not.
Usually with law enforcement, but these two cops clearly violated this man rights. First cop can’t just block the guy from shutting his door cuz “I want to talk.” Then doing a traffic stop for no legal reason.
“Three men can keep a secret if two of them are dead” -Benjamin Franklin
the death of the second man is metaphorical, the primary officer remained silent or dead to the truth,
This I perceive in the sigh and body language. The silence and lack of interrogatory dialogue like hey partner you ok? The guilt of indirectly aligning the factors resulting in death.
They had absolutely no reason to stop and harass this man. He wasn't breaking any laws.
I agree. Someone called the cops on him to get this reaction from him.
He was in no condition to be driving and putting everyone else in danger
edit- he was driving perfectly safe even when cop was on it. "driving right into traffic" if by driving right into he means maintaining his lane fine until his brain was turned off.
I agree!!! He can leave anytime he wants!!!! Bad policing!!!!
@@tp5561bs
Took road pirates to a whole new meaning
Boarding scallywags!!
The man committed no crime and was harassed by police.
@@TheCunnamulla Yep, that's how the cops earn the hate that is bestowed upon them by the public at large.
Now the two can get the house.
😂
There's no reason that cop should have hopped on that truck. NONE. They didn't even have a legal reason to detain him.
Officer - it's none of your business, he didn't owe you an explanation for anything, and I hope you go to prison.
He didn't take off with you on the vehicle. he took off and you jumped on the vehicle.
To be fair, they had a legal reasons to detain him when he fled the welfare check. You can be detained at any time to get asked question from just being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
he was asked to pull the vehicle over because another officer wanted to TALK with him
the other officer stated MULTIPLE times TO the other officer that he JUST wants to talk to him, NEITHER officer verbally declared he was under arrest OR being detained (they always are VERY avoidant of this language yet demand that people NOT leave without detention)... he didnt even know what this was for, he had ZERO knowledge of criminal activity or ANY laws being broken yet took it upon himself to take complete control of the situation from the responding officer (the one that actually attempted the welfare check) and started barking orders, making demands, stating that he was not free to leave ETC
he escalated the situation with zero prior knowledge of the situation, he took it upon himself to decide what should or shouldnt be done without ANY scope on the situation what so ever.. saying "you are not free to leave" is not saying "you are being detained".. and he didnt detain him because he had no legal ground to do so (only the initial officer had grounds to do so and HAD NOT DONE SO)
@@joshjones5172 yeah but they used avoidant language to side step around the fact that they were indeed detaining him but without admitting they were detaining him (because that opens the door for scrutiny of the officers)
cops use colorful language quite often to mask their intentions or to avoid telling someone they are being detained or under arrest -- like when they want to arrest you they say "hop on out for a second" -- cops are cowards
@@joshjones5172You need to have reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime, you can’t detain without that.
@@joshjones5172no they can't hold you on a welfare check when he's talking to them and he wanted to leave That's why the cop couldn't stop him because he can leave a welfare check doesn't mean he's under arrest it means somebody's worried about him they saw him they talked to him the cop let him go that second cop escalated everything The first cop knew he couldn't hold him had no reason to hold him and as the one guy on here said the guy didn't drive off with the cop on the running board The guy drove off the cop jumped on the running board Big difference they had no right to do what they did
Never call the cops for a wellness check unless you want the person to become a victim.
Old man just needs to be left alone for the day, get a meal, sleep, whatever. Cops need to give him space. Wait 3 days. I'm 70, I can relate.
That’s not how the law works.
@@staliokontos8763law is inhumane. Like you demon
@@staliokontos8763 How does it work? Do you have to break the law first?
@@staliokontos8763 LOL We don't have "Rule of Law" in the USA and haven't for many decades now.
@@horseathalt7308 ohh we live in a total anarchy then gotcha you’re a brilliant man hahahahahahaha
That cop purposely jumped on his truck. 100% his fault.
He wanted to do this to that man.
@@mortonbeard2240 They all do, they are all sociopathic meatheads.
The situation did not start with the cop jumping on the truck, it began with the cop's intrusion into an old man's private life in the guise of a 'welfare check' with total disregard for the old man's right to live in peace on his property free of an oppressive government. The daughter is probably a caring person, but she went astray when she invited government into his life. Golly, the old man took drugs - drugs made available by a government that supposedly is anti-drug, but purposely keeps the borders open to facilitate and encourage world-wide commerce within a lucrative drug commerce. How many politicians and bureaucrats benefit economically from the drug trade. What was their contribution to this man's untimely death? No one will ask the basic questions.
@@colnzgprntsJesus man go outside and get a job😂😂😂
@@colnzgprnts They are NOT READY for that conversation. 👏
The cop has overstepped his boundaries.
No he didn’t
Obviously NOT
@@phantomfilms87 ahhh... has it changed to the land of the weak and indentured? no it hasn't you fool
@@Lindaiv3lb exactly what law/s is it that you believe entitles a cop to interfere with a citizen not breaking laws, going about his business? Are you a dumb cop?
@@phantomfilms87what law was broken by the man?
Officer was at fault here.
They have no right to pull that man over in the first place he wasn’t suspected of any crime and officers wouldn’t leave him alone
Cop handled it well until he latched onto the truck. The man wasn’t detained or arrested. There was no crime occurring, committed, or proof of any they would be committed.
No, he handled it badly. He was vague and kept hedging, asking for irrelevant specifics, like "what was said?"
The whole thing was one consistent event, poorly-handled and predictable.
Can you talk to me ? No should have ended there but the Fn police just can’t leave it alone.
Why did they pull him over? No probable cause so please F off.
100 percent the cops fault.
"Welfare" check, o.k. he's just fine, lets check thats its not
Don’t call police
That cop trying to make excuses immediately.
Officer fishing and had no probable cause to detain him much less do all of this
That's what's wrong with law enforcement!!!
@@howlinwulf You spelled investigating wrong. They were doing their job, that's what's right with law enforcement.
it was a welfare check unfortunately Officer didn't understand what that means
and he is free back on duty because there is shortage of police officer so they have to keep him
@@briancleveland6115 brainless in cleveland... they weren't doing their job... they were illegally detaining the victim, without even telling him he was detained.
@@briancleveland6115we are under no legal obligation to assist in their investigation. Stop was unlawful.
It's a crazy living domestic situation, why is a cop trying to figure it all out. There was no crime.
The stupidity of the Officer…. (acts like he’s a family therapist)🤷♀️
I don't know how many times I've heard someone explain the facts to a cop and they still say "well I'm trying to figure x out"
If it was laid out for a 3 year old they couldn't figure it out.
Exactly, why is this cop allowed to keep pestering this guy when no crime has been committed?
a living domestic situation where the daughter hadn't seen dad for several years, but calls to have him committed.
They murderd this man for no reason.
Yeah I am angry af
That cop could have got off the car as it drove off, he chose not to, the cop caused the whole incident, he should be charged.
No, we don't live in a police state. Everything is fine and normal and the state doesn't have a monopoly on violence.
So this is your new norm in the world! It's ok to harass a person because the child said there's something wrong? What about actually helping him?
This is why you NEVER call or speak to the police, for any reason.
Crazy that even with the bodycams fixed in their vests, the officers provoke critical situations and try to lie about what happened, like, they forget or doesn't care about the presence of bodycams that can be both their ally or both their squeaker.
What did the cops lie about?
@@pitbull113 the cop that got on the vehicle said he took off with him on the vehicle, but he didnt. He hopped on after the truck was moving. And he said the guy hit 20 cars. The cop is the one who hit 20 cars.
@@MWolfe He actually said he hit 20's vehicle. 20 is the other cops number.
That's what they do lie lie and lie they can't help it.
@@mavricksroadside2667 and are never held accountable either
Both cops should be fired,riding on the door is a no no.He was sitting in his truck and they could got him out of the truck.
Why is this officer bothering him he got the other people to leave
Bad law-enforcement right there. He violated that man’s rights and murdered him.
He killed an innocent man
No, he didn't.
This was harassment period ! Cop needs to be charged and fired for jumping onto that man’s vehicle period
Guy legally left to calm down & the cops decided to escalate this.
Cops should never try to handle a mental health crisis.
First officer was doing fine, trying to determine if there was someway to help him or if a hold was needed.
Second officer was an idiot
That cop should be in jail now..
No he doesn’t.
in general population
Justified my arse
Cops are in the wrong on this one big time
Jumping onto a moving vehicle in order to detain a suspect violates the training manual of every police department on Earth as well as the owner's manual of every vehicle on Earth, which explains that passengers go in the seats and not the exterior of the vehicle.
Was he even suspected of a crime?
did you listen to the video?
@@momsterzz I did and I have the same question.
@@momsterzzHow does the boot taste?
@@momsterzz How long have you been a bootlicker? I guess those boots taste mighty good to you.
@@momsterzzyea what crime just being paranoid?
Why do they always decide to hope on on jump in the vehicle? He wasn't a armed and dangerous man. Just follow him to the gas station and arrest him. Yet another person ask police for help and it cost their life.
This is fault of one officer. One was de-escalate and the other aggressive and escalating with no brains.
What? Cop 1 didn't leave the man's property when he established no crime was committed.... then radioed for cop 2 when the man had enough of him and left.
Cop 2 illegally stopped the victim, then jumped on his truck, then shot him.
Which cop are you saying is the "good" one?
They saw him start it up, but didn’t go take the keys, and the officer hangs on to the vehicle while he’s driving? Really…
They shouldn’t have even pulled him over.. these Cops overstepped big time
Calling the cops to do a welfare check is kin to hiring a hit man. Except, hit men cost money. The cops will do that sh!t for free.
He had not right to jump on the truck and made the situation worse and then he shoots him?? The cops fault entirely
No it’s not
You're at fault
@@User_92020 Lol
The second cop was about to say “get off the truck!” That officer put himself in that position where he knew he’d have to use deadly force to stop it, but he didn’t put himself in that situation to prevent someone from an imminent threat. That was really dumb.
what is it with cops clinging and climbing into and onto fleeing cars? they always either end up shooting the person fleeing or getting hurt themselves. is this worth it?
And don’t forget getting in front of cars too. Sometimes you shouldn’t call someone’s bluff.
It's not a crime to be angry or want to be left alone! I think it's a crime that an adult child has the right to have cops show up on their parents property and force them to explain how they're not mentally ill to the degree that requires intervention. His daughter could have told the cops any story she wanted, true or not.
The purpose of a welfare check is to check on somebody who you cannot see or reach and there is concern for their safety. But his daughter was at his house and he was obviously alive and not needing anything other than for her to leave him alone. There was no violence threatened nor was he mentally ill. The police are not social workers. What did she think they were going to do? Haul him away for wanting to be left alone? It's ridiculous!
Obviously he should not have driven off and certainly should have stopped once he realized the officer was on the truck. I imagine he was beyond frustrated by then and, knowing that he'd already crossed a line, decided to just ride it out and keep going. Doing that did show a disregard for the officer's safety, which does make the shooting justified. But the entire scenario leading up to that point was created by people who felt they had the right to force him to explain his personal situation for no reason at all. They had no right. I feel like this should be on the daughter, for the most part, for calling the cops for no legitimate reason. So upsetting to see this unfold like it did. They could have just left him alone.
I'm sorry but he had no right to be "left alone" no matter how bad the situation was. With the arrival of the police he had an obligation to explain what was happening, he took a risk and forced the situation which didn't end up well for him
If he just said "I have nothing to say without an attorney present" they'd have to stop asking questions or arrest him at that point.
He doesn't have to explain anything! Cop was in the wrong
@@Brandespada R U SILLY? HE DIDNT HAVE TO EXPLAIN ANYTHING
Your about the most ignorant communist iv seen in the goolags comment section. This was Unlawful detainment & Execution!! Period @@Brandespada
"i was asked to stop you for a minute" lawyer is going to eat these deputies up in the deposition
The deputy put himself in that situation he should’ve been charged💯
You don’t need to answer questions and let the man get some food if his power is out
They slander him as a drug addict but he's not here to defend himself, is he?
This poor excuse of a cop escalated this, then killed the poor man and then tried to play the victim. Extremely poor and disgraceful policing and even more shameful at the justice system.
Oh now you guys see 🤦🏾♂️
All this was an illegal stop.
That cop on the door should go to jail for a long time! What an imbecile
What a maroon!
Cops should of had the people removed of his property but would up looking the man. Complete B.S on the cops part!
And why pull him out like that this town has a police oroblem
the cop murdered him. he had a right to drive to go get food.
Even if he stopped to let the cop off the car, the second the cop let go of the car he would have been pointing his gun at the guy. There's no scenario where that man was going to be alive or free that day. The die had been cast.
@User0000000000000004 wrong you're a sheep who doesn't deserve to live that's why you got vaxed
Not with a cop on the side of the car
You arrive at a welfare check, walk into an argument, and then diffuse the situation. Both parties leave, how is it warranted to keep the man any longer? I understand WHY, but the initial officers last words were “Im asking you”. He responded no & left, and I can’t understand how that wasn’t the end of it. Should’ve just left the guy alone, it was clear he was agitated and any contact with him was only agitating him further.
With all this censorship we might as well listen to the radio again...
Indeed, TPTB are well on their way to creating a totalitarianPoliceStateMatrix.
Both those cops provoked that entire incident, especially the 2nd cop.
They said William was vague in the beginning.... he sounded real clear and concise to me. 😊
First thing I did when I bought my used truck was take off the running/step boards. They always got my pants dirty, and obviously they turn you into an aerated sprinkler system.
@@77Infidel Sometimes they do...