У меня АК-74М стрелял даже когда ветка попала во внутрь ствольной коробки. Механизм просто её перемолол в опилки. Со старшиной проверяли старый АКМС вываленный в грязи на стрельбище,так там вся грязь кусками вылетала вместе с гильзами к хуям собачим. А здесь элементарно пружина не может дослать патрон без сопровождения рукой затвора и клин в два выстрела. На видео типичный китайский АК.
. SaS, паРаша - это страна, где более 30% людей срут в деревянных будках в дырку в земле и топят дровами, но гордятся продажей европейцам газа и полетами в космос, если ракеты не падают.
Для чистоты эксперемента, нужно что бы обе платформы были в равных условиях. В случае с ак, на втором видео, был отстегнут магазин а у ar пристегнут. Не думаю, что если у ar отстегнуть магазин и набить грязью приемник он сможет после этого произвести хоть один выстрел.
Да говно твой ак дебил ты этокий... Частота эксперимента мля... там в начале у твоего АК все было пристегнуто и он обосрался. Может кривизна земли помешала ему стрелять? Лапоть ты болотная
both use different philosophies. the AK is more prone to letting dirt in and jamming but is far quicker and easier to rectify. Its also more resilient to fine particles such as sand and dust due to loose tolerance. The AR is designed to avoid getting anything inside the action in the first place which it does a great job of. However when debri, especially fine debri, enters the action it will require a fairly complex disassembly and thorough cleaning.
It is not easier to rectify even when the AR jams you press the forward assist and you are good. Also the AK bolt degrades over time because the bolts do not bear the load equally.
Сейчас начнется: - Вы неправильный АК использовали - Да он китайский, лучше бы советский или российский использовали. - Да он просто старый, новый бы побелил ваш AR. С учетом того, что эти "гении" говорят: ЛЮБОЙ АК - хороший, и не важно в каком он состоянии. Хочу заметить, AR побольше пытали.
The ak has an open bolt the ar dosent so if something is open it gets dirt in it if its closed it dosent. The ar would be worse to get dirt in because it is much more mechanicaly complex. The ak isnt complex and would be easyer to take apart and clean.
Возвратная пружина в ЖОПЕ поэтому и застряёт затвор, когда служил в армии, АК и не только грязь проходил, т.к. было произведено не где то в подвале, а на заводе! Где хорошие и подогнанные детали.
Я тоже считаю что АК имеет более плохую пружину,но вполне я не когда не понимал спора насчёт АК и АР-15 эти две винтовки хороши,и мне пофиг я же не буду на охоте в болото прыгать,да может быть надо пройти через болото.Но простая чистка и всё.
В США производят одни из худших АК, китайские и те лучше. Секрет в том, что в штатах калаши клепают частные шарашки которые их собирают из деталей привезенных из других стран.
The spring is clearly loosened. On a genuine AK, spring operations cannot be done so easily. The AK was adopted by the Russian army, since it passed heavier tests than the short-term presence in the mud shown here. For AK, this is a regular situation, after which he is guaranteed to work.
@Tranhoang Long Through my hands went 3 AK modifications, over 2 years. For a year and a half he lived with him 24 hours a day, shot up to 20-22 stores a day. I know these weapons up to every screw, up to a millimeter, to the touch and smell.
@Tranhoang Long The shutter with a gas piston at the AK weighs decently, moving at a speed of 4 meters per second, you understand what kind of spring is there?.... Kinetics are so strong that dirt simply cannot stop the operation of this shutter. We had nothing to clean our weapons for 2 months. Dust, dirt, sand, water, every day shooting, coke so much that then it cannot be cleaned with anything. But there was not a single delay in a year and a half. This is the most reliable solution of the ratio of weight of moving parts and spring power. He works whatever happens, always.
@@pasinduweerasinghe3381 What caliber did you use? At first we had 5.45x39 caliber AK74, but after the first battles we changed to AKM, whose caliber was 7.62x39. Heavy bullet is better, especially in the forest and for damage through the lungs shelters. I'm from Russia.
I dont know if thats fair. I love AR's but both times you put it in mud you had a mag in the AR. The second time you put the AK in the mud it had no mag inserted.
At 3:32 minutes, the author clearly conducted the test incorrectly. "AK" was without a strapped magazine. AR has always been with the magazine strapped on. Put the BALL in the dirt without a magazine and we'll see how it will work. Then the Romanian analogue on the video is a replica of the Russian one and I agree that the springs here clearly did not reach the original.
Another guy from the Russian army pointed out that the AK was clearly damaged already. The guy in the video was too easily able to pull the bolt back, which the Russian guy says must be because the spring is broken. I find it funny because the same mistake was done when comparing capitalism to communism. Here the guy in the video does not fire the gun before he throws it in the mud, so we don't know if his gun was broken or not. Similarly when comparing the USSR to the US, people do not realise that the USSR was a very very poor previously before it adopted communism.
@@polper нет! При комунизме было более равноценное распределение для всех людей, сейчас же опять возвращаемся к тому от чего уходили, происходит расслоение общества на богатых и бедных.
@@kylelerie7325 AR guys will find any way to beat down their fellow firearm owners because their precious rifles are stuck so far up their ass, really pathetic tbh
@@herewardthewatchful1014 The difference is you won't need to use the forward assist, because you won't have crap in the chamber to deal with in the first place.
Эксперимент считаю не действительным. Не был показан серийный номер оружия, ни тип патронов, не было поверки в чистом состоянии. Нет смысла здесь спорить с надёжностью АК-74. Эксперимент должен проводиться на 2-3х моделях оружия, чтобы исключить дисперсию результатов.
@@aldiyar69 что начинается, умник блять? АК от завода "ИжМаш" проходит такое тестирование надежности: сначала отстрел 180 патрон, потом 40 минут песчаного шторма в кварцевой пыли, потом нагрев до +50, потом снижение до -50, потом тропический ливень (поливание АК водой в течении длительного времени) после чего несколько падений с 1.5 метра на бетонную плиту, при всем при этом производится настрел 10000 выстрелов. Если автомат клинит - брак. Интернет в помощь. Если здесь АК заклинил после кучки грязи - извините, эту румынскую хуету можете себе в жопу заснуть, я говорю, давайте тогда сравним китайскую эмку и отечественный калаш, честно до ахуения будет.
Всё правильно. Не скажу, что AR плохое оружие. По надёжности они сейчас хорошие. Но АК здесь явно левый. И неизвестно, что за патроны. Может в Walmart купили самые дешёвые китайские патроны по доллару ведро? Эти патроны в самом хорошем и чистом оружие клинят 7 из 10. У нас калаши в армии сколько раз в грязи тонули. За 10 лет не помню чтобы у кого-то автомат заклинило или перекос патрона пошёл.
0:34 на археологических раскопках в африке нашли АК74, его возраст датируется 1500 лет до нашей эры, уникальный образец пребывал в своей естественной среде хранения примерно 3000 лет и исправно функционирует до сих пор.
I will try to present a neutral view on this, although i identify as an AR-15 Enjoyer The AK (contrary to popular belief in this comment section) is a Real AK, manufactured in Romania, with No Significant Difference in terms of Reliability to Russian Production AKs, and the fact that the AK Jammed is because the AK is simply an Open System, Great for Arctic Conditions, but not at all great for mud And about the AR Passing, I'm not surprised, as it's a Sealed System, Designed to Keep Stuff out Overall, i still believe that Both are Incredibly Reliable Rifles on it's own accord, and that this test is a good test for the laughs and giggles, because there will be no soldier dumb enough to submerge their Rifles in mud like that
I found this article on problems with the military testing the M4..if it's TRUE it's a serious problem. www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-usas-m4-carbine-controversy-03289/
@@wirelessone2986 well, i do believe that Early M4s do have Problems with Reliability, but i believe thet have worked hard to get the reliability problem resolved
On "AK" the return spring is faulty, it can be seen. He cannot shoot normally even when he is clean. And this is not a Russian "AK". My Russian AK has a much more energetic return spring.
С первого же заряжания недосыл патрона, слабая пружина явно видно. Чтоб так клинил грязь надо вовнутрь накидать, и то не факт что клинить будет . Второе ак полностью был в воде и в магазин натекло песочной жижи. 15й лежал магазином кверху
Арсалан Дамдинов ваш автомат хуйня его и опускать не надо он и так опущен если не веришь то поищи ещё подобных видосов на ютубе и в каждом из них калаш сливает мке.
@@gilza_9116 наш? Каким боком он ваш?)) Он принадлежит концерну. У тебя ни капли прав нет на него))) ты даже настоящий калаш купить не можешь, в отличии от американцев 😂😂😂😂😂
Так где подтверждение твоей легенде о супернадежности, Леша? Таких видосов не один и не два, но постоянно АК почему-то не стреляет ядерными зарядами и не самоочищается от грязи каким-нибудь заколдованным веничком, а клинит
@@skillteam9866 Где везде? Покажите хоть одно спец. Подразделение США, где этот автомат используется. А то,что у нас ФСО и ФСБ закупает американские M4 и Немецкие HK416 о чем нам говорит? То-то же.
Дело не только в возвратной пружине. Пазы были сильно загрязнены, поэтому затвор клинил. Чтобы его сдвинуть, нужно было приложить немалое усилие. Никакая возвратная пружина с таким не справится. В AR меньше щелей, поэтому в затворную группу попало меньше грязи. Но есть и обратная сторона этой особенности: чтобы восстановить работоспособность, АК достаточно промыть в воде, а AR-ку нужно разбирать.
Did the same test twice with 2 different AK’s and 2 different AR’s. My results were way different. I don’t think these tests prove much but to show who’s an avid fan of either rifle.
The spring of the AK return mechanism is abnormal and very weak, it is impossible to easily erect the AK with two fingers, the AK native spring is very tight and rigid.
@Report of the day AKs do fucking do that, they're machines, not designed by God himself No tool is perfect, and The AK did here what most other weapons could NEVER do, it could still fire while gunked up
As a life long soldier (16 years and counting) in a military that uses a galil variant which is basically a AK in 5.56 i can honestly say that with little use the AR seems to be the superior firearm . That said i would still personally prefer an AK\galil as my personal firearm, i'd get that AK running in a few seconds , where as im not convinced that issues with an AR could be sorted out as fast.
@We Wuz Waaagh!! ! Agreed! But in a worse case scenario after a rinse with a canteen , a 6 second strip and quick thorough cleaning of the BOLT will solve any issue.
@@MyFathersBusinessLLC That's the point ak are cheap in compare to what they provide simple and reliable while ar is just too expensive for countries with weak economies or huge armies to upgrade to them
Pro mags are shit tbh, but my saiga74 has never had an issue, shit I even dumped it in muck and shot 25 rounds out of 30 before a jam, luck of the draw I guess
They did a test after they both were completely cleaned out. Watch the full length video..... The AK ran just fine clean, as did the AR. No "weak recoil spring" as some Russian commenters were saying.... (Which doesn't make any sense regardless as the issue was a failure to eject...) These tests have been done time and time again with various AR's (from cheap crap to Russian Arsenals) and the results have been mostly the same as seen here.
The ar would of stoped when the ak did If he left the dust cover open real world battles the dust cover is open And I don’t even own a AK and I can say this was not a even test
The dislike of the video is due to the theme of the video "AR vs AK test mud", because this is: "AR vs WASR mud test". If you want to compare American and Russian weapons, then use Russian weapons, not Romanian weapons! If you think this is the same thing, then every American product and its Chinese copy are the same thing and we can use the Chinese version of the product to evaluate the quality of the American version of the product!
@@jerromedrakejr9332 Alright, let me say this, russian fanboy. First of all, the video or the title didn’t even said “American AR vs Russian AK mud test”, which means that we don’t know whether those two guns were originally an American/Russian version, which means that, that AR and that AK was probably a different foreign version/model (Chinese or Romanian, yeah). Second of all, even though the AK on the video was a “Romanian” or a foreign version, it is still the goddamn same, with only slightly differences on the look, the way it shoots, the way it works, it’s the same. Like bro, accept the result of a fight, win or lose. The AR beats the AK with no advantages in a fairly fight. I don’t get why toxic people like you complain about it.
@@spinning_ice1487 As someone who is in the army equipped with Soviet/Russian and domestic weapons manufactured according to Russian models, I know that it is not a Russian AK but a Romanian WASR, so I wrote that. At no point did I say what you were quoting "American AR vs Russian AK mud test". Simply, if you mention the AK mark then use Russian weapons. All copies of the Russian AK have their own markings, but obviously it suits you better to compare a shitty copy and state that it is the original. The good quality original and the low quality copy are not the same. Related to your rude behavior: Russian funboy? Not something special, they didn't really touch my heart ... But as someone who fought against the Americans and all its NATO halflings, I'm definitely not a US/NATO funboy. On the other hand, apart from the fact that you are a US funboy, obviously you are towards the rest of the world, especially Russia and very likely China, a hateboy ... or you are not more than 9 years old ... After all, if you think that this comparison is enough to confirm the superiority of AR over AK, feel free to take one AR and come, I'm waiting for you with domestic version of Russian AK - "M". Don't worry, those copies of the Russian AK marked "M" are recognized worldwide as extremely good copies with a quality equal to the Russian AK, but that's why these "M" copies work much better than that Romanian garbage WASR, which are again, in the whole world recognized as extremely bad copies of the Russian AK. P.S. I had the opportunity to come into possession of the American AR as a war trophy during one of the actions of cleaning the terrain - it was not worth spending energy to carry it, useless garbage...
@@jerromedrakejr9332 Alright, I’m not trying to be interested on your career or trying to change the point of our argument. But did you serve in the Russian Military? Yes or no?
@@jerromedrakejr9332 I would 100% completely trust a norinco ar15 to work for me as well. I have seen them to be extremely reliable, dispite people saying norinco is inferior. Yes of course a kac sr15 will be more reliable, however the norinco is no slouch, a good design is a good design. Not to say the ak is a bad design, but the ar15 is sealed better than the AK is, it has a dust cover and completely seals it off from the environment. I would imagine the ak is better at long intervals without maintainence, but then again, I have seen ar15s with 12000 rounds with no cleaning or lube run without malfunctions.
I have never heard either of these weapons will be reliable with mud and rocks in them... *HOWEVER* where I have heard the AK47 outshines the AR15, is you can take a AK47 over to some undisturbed puddle of water, rinse it out with plain water (or a bottle of water) and with no lubrication will fire reliably. If you were stuck in a jungle with no cleaning kit and no oil, my understanding is the AR15 will eventually not be reliable without the proper things to clean and lubricate. The AK47 only needs some semi clean water. That to me is a huge advantage. In a war, or SHTF scenario, you will likely run out of clean patches, and oil... at that point, you will have only water at your disposal, so will the AR15 operate reliably on only semi clean water? That would be the true test of reliability to me. Do this same test, but after you pull it out the mud, have a creek or large puddle of water near by, submerge the weapons into the water and manipulate the action while agitating them around to get off as much mud as possible, then after cleaning it the best you can in 30 seconds in that water, shoot them both. Shoot 90 rounds through each and see which one has more reliability issues. Another test to do would be to remove all lubricants from both weapons and then fire 1,000 rounds through each with no cleaning. Again I will bet the AK47 outshines the AR15 here. Don't get me wrong, under certain controlled conditions, the AR15 outshines the AK47, but reliability is not one of them. If I was part of a swat team, where we operated in a urban environment, and not likely to shoot more than 300 rounds in a single engagement, I would want a AR15 hands down as the accuracy is better, follow up shots are quicker, and its is typically lighter. Now if I was going into the woods, and had no idea how long it would be before I could potentially have access to additional oil, cleaning kits, etc, and I could be out there for months or even years, I would want a AK47.
Conveniently you have clean water when mud is everywhere, yeah right haha. Obviously another dirty puddle wont clear mud from both rifles but sure AK is a bit better in "self cleaning". But you forgot that in case of AR15 you can basically unpin it, open and pour water this way so everything will go out. SHTF scenario is stretching too much to defend your beloved AK by putting it into some drastic hypothetical situation and then making assumption that AK somehow have advantage. Going with mud filled AK without cleaning and lubing will fuck it up anyway too, or make it unreliable. AR15 will obviously function without oil and cleaning patches, and even then unless you wipe out literally everything from earth that is related to civilisation you will still have option to lube and clean it. Perhaps if you go on for years you will run out of lube or other things to clean it in local area but that is still stretching argument into extreme hypothetical situations.
Enough of these comments, they’re good on their own ok? In my opinion, AK is simpler and cheaper design. AR is more advanced. I love both of them, no hate on each one.
I agree. But I thought the shells from the AK were silver... so possibly steel casing? If steel casing is being used I don’t think it’s a good test for either gun. Brass is the way to go. But I do t the the facts of this test.
Both are great machines with their own pros and cons. It's cheaper to feed an AK though, so I prefer it and the sights just work for my aging eyes better.
@@briand4000 I can get the 5.56 NATO surplus far easier and typically cheaper. I opted for a mil spec Tavor,. Fast field strip for cleaning and ammo availability is better for me. $140usd for 500 rounds.
The whole thing with AR's not being reliable comes from years back in both Vietnam and when our troops first went into Afghanistan. They have for the most part worked out the kinks and it is pretty reliable now.
The problems with the AR15 (the Colt designation for an off-the-shelf Colt civilian rifle (Model 601) that would later be DOD standardized as the M16 after official adoption) in Vietnam had to do with the rifle having a non chromed chamber and bore and switching from stick to WWII surplus ball powder which increased that the cyclic rate of the rifle caused ejection problems and also caused parts to break. The Army failed to issue cleaning kits and did not train troops in maintaining their weapons. Since the normal procurement and testing process didn't occur before the Army ordered their AR15s, the rifles were basically tested and evaluated in combat in Vietnam.
Ah, plenty of face-saving, plenty of excuses... Time and time again ARs fail and there's more and more explicit proof of this AR inferiority with the Pakistan rifle trials being just one recent example. The AR-10 failed, but it did have very good accruacy when it did function. Just one example: A guy in Afghanistan had to use 3 separate M4's during one firefight at his FOB. "there're many kinds of ARs" is what I use to hear everytime ARs failed as an excuse. Downplaying things and saving-face. Suddenly, no AR fanboy wants to say "oh this AR did well but we'll see how the rest do." All of a sudden, with something positive, every AR becomes awesome to them. I could go on and on. Maintenance... I won't even bother explaining. But I will point out that you can't assume everything will be put on hold just so you can stop to perform maintenance. This was the case for a group of soldiers in Iraq who drove trucks and ran into issues because they simply don't have the time to stop and baby a rifle that is expected to be used in combat. Doesn't help if you lose a part during disassembly and reassembly either. You can do it all with an AK with your eyes closed, LoL ARs are still unreliable to this day and still have inferior maintenance. Is it as bad as before? Nah.
@@zoltancsikos5604 Látom te magyar vagy. Az AR román gyártmány lenne? Az AK most is a világ legjobb gepkarabelya és mindig is az volt, nem véletlen hogy kiirtották vele a fel világot sok millió embert. Láttam videót nem rég azt hiszem Pakisztánban a hóhér egész sorozatot eresztett az AK-bol a földre fektetett emberekbe és csak utána haltak meg. 3-4 lövés nem volt elég nem értem az AK ennyire gyenge lenne? Mennyi a kaliberű ? 9mmes? Meg 6-7 lövés után is mozogtak az emberek így egész tárat kellett beleloni
In my last years in the army i used m4, and I've gotta tell as much as i like the gun, shape, accuracy, possibilities. I would still take an ak for war
It's a matter of opinion whether one is better than the other. Personally, I prefer the M4 because that's the weapon platform I am more familiar with, and it is far easier to add attachments. Having a grenade launcher, ir laser sight, nods, acog and forward grip gives you more versatility at the expense of weight. Furthermore, a disciplined soldier would be keeping regular maintenance of his weapon by taking it apart and cleaning it every night or after mission, like brushing ones teeth. For me the only time I'd prefer AK over M4 would be in an apocalyptic situation, but even then I think I'd rather have the weapon I'm the most familiar with.
@@_MaZTeR_ didn't really see the point of your argument their, no your not screwed for life but it was an exaggeration in the first place. The ak will do better in sand and dust due to the clearances, the ar is more closed off and will do better in muddy situations. The ar has more small moving parts as well in comparison so it's going to be more difficult when something does go wrong. The ak will be easier to get back to function when field stripped in comparison for this reason. I'd take either into a combat situation both great rifles.
@@masonlaw7628 the AK actually does better in cold, better then the ARcould dver dream Mud, dirt, sand is where the AR seems to just do better (but no actual soldier would ever put a gun through a situation where the reliability would matter)
When I saw more dislikes I figured the AK must have performed poorly. People like to hold onto their preconceived notions. I own an AK and love it but any machine that has moving parts can fail. Ive always thought the large tolerances actually give more room for dirt to build up.
@@Filimok look... AK is better in Antarctic conditions like -20 below zero Fahrenheit when the gun is encased in a block of ice, but for ANY other situation including mud and sand I would prefer the close tolerances of the AR keeping out the dirt to the AK's loose tolerances that work the dirt into the gun after a few rounds any day. dry lubes may help AR in SUB ZERO conditions as well.
@@shadyend5401 там пружину порезали на половину примерно, конечно затвор не будет доходить до конца. А скорее всего это не советский и не российский, а китайский или может румыния, там вообще конструктивно он отличается
Может мне кажется но на ак затвор как то легко открывается , как буд то там пружины нет , а вернее там какая то слабая или пиленная пружина. Так же двигается затвор у страйкбольного ак.
To be fair here , that AK has literally no freaking recoil spring. That spring couldn’t hold a ball point pen open. If it had a much better ALG spring in it I’ll bet you it would’ve done a hell of a lot better.
The AK is designed to be reliable when it comes to everyday dirt not hardcore dirt. However the fact it took the AR basically being made from mud to fire less than 3 rounds before jamming while the AK being dropped in a mud puddle gave it a 2 round shot limit and after that rarely fired proves which is better.
It proves nothing.Change the recoil spring on that AK and put a reliable magazine in it because this one isn't and then do this test again. ON EQUAL TERMS.
@@biggysnaps2827 Yes we did. unforatnly you dont seem to know that a ak can be dissasembled into three basics parts easily. the aks that are desigend to work in such enviromental conditions have way heavier springs (which also means more force just to be concret) and those work even in this mud, not to mention that you scrab out the spring very easily without even using specialised tools. if a ak dosent shoot , its takes a max of 15 seconds to fix that and get back into action. want to see you do that with a ar 15
@@ael371 I suppose you can't do that with an AR. But then, you don't have to. Why have a gun that's easy to fix a problem with when you can have a gun that doesn't have that problem to begin with? A sealed action keeping mud from getting in is a lot better than one designed to be fixed after getting mud into it.
@@ael371 actually you can do that with AR that’s if you know how to use one but from my personal observation you own a ak so you probably don’t know that people can sort out jams faster than that🎉
Highdelta the spring is weak on ak. This is wasr. A lot of people think this video is right. It’s not. He’s using a cheap ak with cheap spring and parts. I can’t believe the ak even shot how cheap and shitty the wasr is.
Benny A Russian AK wouldn’t magically perform better after being in mud. They all have the same basic design, regardless of what country they’re from. The reason people have always said the AK is so high quality and never fails, is because in Russia, high quality means “easy to fix when it breaks down”, while in America, it means “doesn’t break down”.
When I went through SF training we were on the range firing all US weapons from WWI upto 1970, that included the M-14 and M-16. When we were finished the NCO from weapons committee walked over to a mud puddle and picked up am AK-47 full of mud and water, he pulled up a magazine, inserted it, racked the bolt and let slide forward and pulled the trigger and sent 30 rounds down range. He looked at us and said, "This is the weapon of your enemies!" I never forgot my introduction to the AK-47.
wow... the Chinese AK (or intentionally broken), I don't know what these AR boys wanted to say and prove in the video, but the Kalashnikov is so legendary that every American housewife knows that it is a super hardy and reliable weapon, yes, in general, the AK-74 version is a little less reliable than the AK-47, but if it is the original with of the Russian Izhevsk plant, then it will definitely not behave like in the video, you can find on RUclips how each specimen is tested, they are not only bathed in mud, but also thrown from a height, frozen, sandblasted in a germo-chamber
AK fans are butthurt because "this AK is not true Russian". Actually, all internals are just as same as in Russian AK or Rumunian AK. AK isn't magical piece of indestructibility and unjammability - it will jam and rust just like all other guns.
@@utilizatorm561 you mean the difference between Russian and Romanian aks. It's like calling your 95 Honda civic a 2018 silverado 6.6l duramax with allison transmission. No exaggeration, they are that different in quality
One argument I always see is, "but you can clean an AK faster than an AR!" Now that might be true, but you are probably still dead in that time too. Bottomline is don't get your AK or AR muddy in the first place.
imho-- bottomline, there's NO justification for AKs not being engineered w/ dust cover, that only opens during eject-stroke, then closes itself; THAT would beat the AR; would NOT be rocket science
@@thisaccountwashacked666 right, but, in COMBAT, when you suddenly rcv lots of accurate enemy fire, you may find that you instinctively dropped to the prone in a couple inches of mud. especially true of the Cherries in your unit. very common occurrence.
@Андрей Серёгин Что калаш типо весь такой крутой. А на самом деле он плохой и устаревший. Его популярность из-за того что советское командование массово продавала их всяким диктаторам и террористом со всего мира. Вот и всё
@@scilvaskhumbongmayum3797 If quality is an issue, then the finnish valmet (the highest quality ak) would perform significantly different. It does not. The design if the AK is not good at keeping grime out of its locking surfaces. The quality isn't the issue, the design is. The AR is much more sealed, and can actually keep the mud out.
@@scilvaskhumbongmayum3797 AK is AK even if American made or Russian made lol. U still believe in those Russian lies that the AK can't malfunction which is not true lol. AR is still better than the AK's
Так потому что АК это вещь неубиваемая и вряд-ли из-за какой-то там грязи затвор откидываться не будет так как ещё при войне во Вьетнаме он прошёл любые погодные условия те же болота, грязь, песок ему было поебать и вряд-ли бы он стал настолько культовым автоматом если бы боялся обычной грязи а тут ясен хер что это подделка
I keep telling all the COD players, the AK is overhyped and it is basically an open door for mud and grime and shit, if you know anything about the basic designs the AK is basically an open to the environment while the AR keep the environment out
People see a mud test and say "oh it wasn't this type" then stop saying the AK-47 is reliable and say the AK-47 with the maple wood and the steel that's folded 1002 times with the lucky rabbits food made in the southeast part of Russia and used by the Spetsnaz is a extremely reliable gun. People always talk how the AK is ultra reliable as if mud doesn't effect mechanical parts the same way. As if every cheap and non cheap AK platform isn't the same platform. The AK-47 is a good gun that is basic and required little care to work good. It packs a punch and is very notorious. Notice I didn't ever call it invincible or infallible.
This is a cheap ak with shitty parts compared to a ar which are very expensive so I dont get your arugement as its retarded, it's like comparing a £100 phone to a £1000 phone
@@mcwaff8661 yeeeeeees, its ROMANIAN cheap trash for 5$ use a nice ak, Lead guitar u just know that ak is better, but still want AR seem more reliable, cause you spread propoganada u pig.
@@MyFathersBusinessLLC Hello English speaking friend! The real AK is produced at the Izhevsk Machine-Building Plant, I don’t see that this fake was made there, neither the serial number nor the factory stamps were shown to us. When I was in the army, we already had AKs of the hundredth series, AK 74 is already the last century, and what is shown in the video is half a plastic piece of shit.
I'm so glad that I'm not one of those blue-eye AK fanboys who think that rifle works better than any AR rifle in any conditions, or any of those AR fanboys who think that more modern and American can do the job better. I actually think the both guns have their pros and cons just like any weapon. Plain and simple.
Both rifles are exceptionally awesome. That being said…..after your extreme mud test is comes down to favoritism. Yes I said it. Both guns are great and work best under certain conditions. Anytime mud is packed inside a firearm, it will moSt likely effect the overall shooting quality of the weapon.
It's just that one weapon is military, and the other is for the police. Before such tests, show the working condition of the weapon. And then they brought a rusty AK with a broken spring.
@@sebastianbaez-serrano2298 then they opened it and plus what’s the point of buying a gun with the design of if you get stuff into it you can clean out easily but the AR you have a cover for it so you won’t get stuff in it that’s getting a couch that is easy to clean that’s all white but you can also buy a couch that has a wrapping around it so you won’t spill anything on it
If you learned something in Vietnam, you wouldn't go to other countries. The whole world already hates you, you have brought so much grief to people in other people's homes. Now the Russians will ask you for everything.
AR-15 - американская полуавтоматическая винтовка под патрон 5,56×45 мм. Выпускается с 1963 года, поступает в продажу в качестве гражданского оружия для самообороны, охоты и т. п, является штатным оружием полиции.
I have been doing mud tests with my ak47s for years and never had that problem. Dropped my AR once in the mud and it was done. You guys set the ak up to fail. Ak47s are known to all ways run no matter what
Every firearm can malfunction, it's not impossible for AKs to do so. Of course, there're American AR fanboys everywhere in these comments jerking-off to this coping propaganda.
The AK is a rifle it will Rust it will Jam it will fail just like many others. It's not some indestructible piece of equipment. It fails sometimes deal with it.
@Your Typical Pinoy I had stated that that AK was like any other rifle, meaning it has it's flaws like any other rifle. I hope that clears the confusion.
Вот посмотрел от любопытства. Удивился вашему испытанию. Я прослужил 30 лет и автомат всегда работал безотказно у всего подразделения. Конечно специально в затвор песок не засыпали. Но и при минусовых когда под -20 и в жару +40. И в дождь и в снег. Ну я конечно все видел своими глазами в вашем испытании. Спасибо за видео.
I seen a test with a Russian ak a ar15 and the new Springfield hellion they were frozen and the springfield was the only gun to shoot at all and it fired all 30rds
The 7.62 mm Kalashnikov assault rifle (AK)[4] is a submachine gun adopted in the USSR in 1949; the GRAU index is 56-A-212. It was constructed in 1947 by M. T. Kalashnikov. AK and its modifications are the most common small arms in the world, it is included in the Guinness Book of Records: there are more than 100 million units of this machine gun, it is in service with 106 countries of the world [5]. To this type (including licensed and unlicensed copies, as well as third-party developments based on AK) belongs up to 1/5 of all small automatic firearms available in the world[6]. Based on the 7.62 mm Kalashnikov assault rifle, a family of combat and civilian small arms of various calibers was created, including AKM and AK74 submachine guns and their modifications, Kalashnikov light machine gun, carbines and smoothbore Saiga rifles and others, including abroad of the USSR. The total number of all varieties of the Kalashnikov assault rifle in storage and armament of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation for 2013 was 17,000,000 units[7].
бл уже весь мир знает что калаш лучше чем М16 или АР !! НО только амеры не могут успокоится и выдают всем китайскую копию калаша за Советскую !! какие же жалкие эти люди !
This is a Russian or Romanian Kalashnikov there is a big difference in quality between them!The original Kalashnikov is made only in Russia at the Izhmash plant in Izhevsk.
It’s the same platform produced under license and same specs. AK has giant tolerances and gaps. Which kill the gun in mud. But it performs slightly better in dusty situation.
@@TarlanT Oh, no!All licenses have expired and all Kalashnikovs produced in Bulgaria, Romania and other countries are not licensed and can be of any quality.The machine may look like a Kalashnikov,or be called a Kalashnikov, but Kalashnikov is only available in Russia. You don't buy a Ford made in Taiwan or a Mercedes made in Brazil.
1% People complaining about the AK not working before the test 80%Murricans complaining about some guys who said the test is not legit 19%Something else
Using the same broken AK and expecting a different result is simply genius level!
Q
Yes
Doing the same thing and expecting different results is the actual definition of insanity
@@coryryan7909
I call that the philosophical definition of insanity.
Buy another AK to him them, yikes
У меня АК-74М стрелял даже когда ветка попала во внутрь ствольной коробки. Механизм просто её перемолол в опилки. Со старшиной проверяли старый АКМС вываленный в грязи на стрельбище,так там вся грязь кусками вылетала вместе с гильзами к хуям собачим. А здесь элементарно пружина не может дослать патрон без сопровождения рукой затвора и клин в два выстрела. На видео типичный китайский АК.
Причём нам даже не показали как этот АК в чистом виде стреляет,может он так-же клинит
. Х com, ты лично это видел?
. Sas channеl, tibla, параша - это не Россия?
. SaS, паРаша - это страна, где более 30% людей срут в деревянных будках в дырку в земле и топят дровами, но гордятся продажей европейцам газа и полетами в космос, если ракеты не падают.
. SaS, что странного? Просто ты не в 30% малоимущих.
Это данные вашего Росстата.
. Ты в каком регионе живешь?
That's why soldiers don't put their weapons in the mud. Even crawling around, we cradle it like a baby.
man some poeple that trained in Russia put AK in black sea for 2 weeks then they had to grab it and it shooted perfectly fine
Yes anyone ill treats their bread and butter is a damn stupid fool.
But this is a mod test
And the ak performed better than any weapon is expected to
@@jidk6565yeh, it may be good in a mud test, but AR 15s are superior in combat.
@@bigiron8501 No they not. Ak-47 are simple build easy to clean and breakdown. I have even heard soildiers say ak47 was better
Для чистоты эксперемента, нужно что бы обе платформы были в равных условиях. В случае с ак, на втором видео, был отстегнут магазин а у ar пристегнут. Не думаю, что если у ar отстегнуть магазин и набить грязью приемник он сможет после этого произвести хоть один выстрел.
Да там на калаше пружину срезали - не может так шлипко затрная группа шевелиться.
Да говно твой ак дебил ты этокий... Частота эксперимента мля... там в начале у твоего АК все было пристегнуто и он обосрался. Может кривизна земли помешала ему стрелять? Лапоть ты болотная
он обманул ,зрителей! он в ака закинул с открытой смена режима, то есть туда грязь ебать забьется в ар он не открыл
Да они фуфлыжники .
У пиндосав всегда все самое лучшее.
Вот только работает через раз в лучшем случае
И ещё один момент,калаш то Румынский а не Российский 🤦🤦🤦🤦😏😏😏😂😂😂😂😂😂
Молодцы тестеры, АК взяли не настоящий, видно, что пружина слишком слабая. Закинули в грязь без магазина, м 16 без магазина не топили.
Надо бля советский брать и самим тестить
Magazin in Russian stands for Shop or Store...😂😂🇷🇺🇺🇸
Иди лесом, мамкин эксперт. АК мусор.
@@MrIgor13 в голове у тебя мусор
@@artemvektor1 ruclips.net/video/yZK7NomgpU0/видео.html
both use different philosophies. the AK is more prone to letting dirt in and jamming but is far quicker and easier to rectify. Its also more resilient to fine particles such as sand and dust due to loose tolerance. The AR is designed to avoid getting anything inside the action in the first place which it does a great job of. However when debri, especially fine debri, enters the action it will require a fairly complex disassembly and thorough cleaning.
Согласен, дурость.
Fairly complex? You can do it all with a allen wrench that you'll use for 2 maybe 3 things.
It is not easier to rectify even when the AR jams you press the forward assist and you are good.
Also the AK bolt degrades over time because the bolts do not bear the load equally.
Ar takes two pins to get access to all internals, not complex at all
@@infamous5369 A guy who owned both told me differently but okay.
Тестировать надо Российский АК а не Румынский . Они разные
Согласен
Какая хер разница?
@@Qabaq_Qarabas soviet AK47 is very precisions of the Romanian schits !!!
@@Qabaq_Qarabas Большая. Они конструктивно разные!!
@@jacekpodstawski8804 )))
Сейчас начнется:
- Вы неправильный АК использовали
- Да он китайский, лучше бы советский или российский использовали.
- Да он просто старый, новый бы побелил ваш AR.
С учетом того, что эти "гении" говорят: ЛЮБОЙ АК - хороший, и не важно в каком он состоянии.
Хочу заметить, AR побольше пытали.
Results - don't put gun in mud
Read the title, The results is the AR is more resistant in mud
You expect a war without mud? Be realistic.
I'm pretty sure he was trying to make a joke.But you're obviously dumb as rocks
@@piggy9119 man why u serious ?? Take chill
@@ilhammovic7660 there is no mud in Iraq
I knew as soon as I saw the amount of dislikes vs likes the AK failed. lol
In fairness, the AK did really, really well. It still worked. It's no AR, but it did well. Very few guns can do that well.
blunt3068 that is the exact conclusion that I came to before I even scrolled down to read the comments.
Bet if he would have took the mag out before he put the ar in it wouldn't have worked just sayin
In other words take away the closed system that allows the AR to function in this test?
The ak has an open bolt the ar dosent so if something is open it gets dirt in it if its closed it dosent. The ar would be worse to get dirt in because it is much more mechanicaly complex. The ak isnt complex and would be easyer to take apart and clean.
Возвратная пружина в ЖОПЕ поэтому и застряёт затвор, когда служил в армии, АК и не только грязь проходил, т.к. было произведено не где то в подвале, а на заводе! Где хорошие и подогнанные детали.
Я тоже считаю что АК имеет более плохую пружину,но вполне я не когда не понимал спора насчёт АК и АР-15 эти две винтовки хороши,и мне пофиг я же не буду на охоте в болото прыгать,да может быть надо пройти через болото.Но простая чистка и всё.
В США производят одни из худших АК, китайские и те лучше. Секрет в том, что в штатах калаши клепают частные шарашки которые их собирают из деталей привезенных из других стран.
@@АртемКретов-й6г откуда такая информация?
@@АртемКретов-й6г ссылку кинь
@@beloy_7632 попробуй написать. Топ худших АК.
The spring is clearly loosened. On a genuine AK, spring operations cannot be done so easily. The AK was adopted by the Russian army, since it passed heavier tests than the short-term presence in the mud shown here. For AK, this is a regular situation, after which he is guaranteed to work.
@Tranhoang Long Through my hands went 3 AK modifications, over 2 years. For a year and a half he lived with him 24 hours a day, shot up to 20-22 stores a day. I know these weapons up to every screw, up to a millimeter, to the touch and smell.
@Tranhoang Long The shutter with a gas piston at the AK weighs decently, moving at a speed of 4 meters per second, you understand what kind of spring is there?.... Kinetics are so strong that dirt simply cannot stop the operation of this shutter. We had nothing to clean our weapons for 2 months. Dust, dirt, sand, water, every day shooting, coke so much that then it cannot be cleaned with anything. But there was not a single delay in a year and a half. This is the most reliable solution of the ratio of weight of moving parts and spring power. He works whatever happens, always.
We used the copy of ak 47 named t56 ,the chinese one,its worked well in every situations ,im from sri lanka
@@pasinduweerasinghe3381 What caliber did you use? At first we had 5.45x39 caliber AK74, but after the first battles we changed to AKM, whose caliber was 7.62x39. Heavy bullet is better, especially in the forest and for damage through the lungs shelters. I'm from Russia.
@@ツェリョガ it's the 7.62x39mm the srilankan army used the 56-2
Ak :- so you gotta throw me in mud
I will act like I won't work
he "accidentally" hold the cocking handle so long to force mud go in the chamber
The mud on both of those pretty toys has almost made me cry
@@dprov1877 absoutely
@Tranhoang Long it can depending on who you buy it from
I dont know if thats fair. I love AR's but both times you put it in mud you had a mag in the AR. The second time you put the AK in the mud it had no mag inserted.
@@taipeinova101 no
@@Chosen_Ash yes they cheated
Cheaters
cheaters , very lame and missleading as usual usa propaganda
@@mohamedlamine5456 not misleading. Multiple tests have been done before and same results, ar wins.
At 3:32 minutes, the author clearly conducted the test incorrectly. "AK" was without a strapped magazine. AR has always been with the magazine strapped on. Put the BALL in the dirt without a magazine and we'll see how it will work. Then the Romanian analogue on the video is a replica of the Russian one and I agree that the springs here clearly did not reach the original.
Another guy from the Russian army pointed out that the AK was clearly damaged already. The guy in the video was too easily able to pull the bolt back, which the Russian guy says must be because the spring is broken.
I find it funny because the same mistake was done when comparing capitalism to communism.
Here the guy in the video does not fire the gun before he throws it in the mud, so we don't know if his gun was broken or not. Similarly when comparing the USSR to the US, people do not realise that the USSR was a very very poor previously before it adopted communism.
Ахаха. Когда то был коммунизм? Может я чего то не знаю?
Once he was dipped without a magazine and you immediately became... Although after the first time he began to wedge WITH MAGAZINE... LOL
@@godfather7339 Russia was richer, MUCH richer than under communism ...
@@polper нет! При комунизме было более равноценное распределение для всех людей, сейчас же опять возвращаемся к тому от чего уходили, происходит расслоение общества на богатых и бедных.
Bottom line- if anything goes into the chamber thats not supposed to be there, its going to malfunction at some point. Regardless of the firearm
At least you can slam the bolt home with the AK. With the AR you can "assist" the bolt home. lol!
Hereward The Watchful AK guys will change words around to make the AK seem superior, really pathetic tbh
@@kylelerie7325 AR guys will find any way to beat down their fellow firearm owners because their precious rifles are stuck so far up their ass, really pathetic tbh
XxEVIL_KFC_DUDExX I actually love the AK. But some of the owners and fan boys of the rifle are just obnoxious
@@herewardthewatchful1014 The difference is you won't need to use the forward assist, because you won't have crap in the chamber to deal with in the first place.
Эксперимент считаю не действительным. Не был показан серийный номер оружия, ни тип патронов, не было поверки в чистом состоянии. Нет смысла здесь спорить с надёжностью АК-74. Эксперимент должен проводиться на 2-3х моделях оружия, чтобы исключить дисперсию результатов.
Dr. Arbalet ой бля, начинается
@@aldiyar69 что начинается, умник блять? АК от завода "ИжМаш" проходит такое тестирование надежности: сначала отстрел 180 патрон, потом 40 минут песчаного шторма в кварцевой пыли, потом нагрев до +50, потом снижение до -50, потом тропический ливень (поливание АК водой в течении длительного времени) после чего несколько падений с 1.5 метра на бетонную плиту, при всем при этом производится настрел 10000 выстрелов. Если автомат клинит - брак. Интернет в помощь. Если здесь АК заклинил после кучки грязи - извините, эту румынскую хуету можете себе в жопу заснуть, я говорю, давайте тогда сравним китайскую эмку и отечественный калаш, честно до ахуения будет.
Всё правильно. Не скажу, что AR плохое оружие. По надёжности они сейчас хорошие. Но АК здесь явно левый. И неизвестно, что за патроны. Может в Walmart купили самые дешёвые китайские патроны по доллару ведро? Эти патроны в самом хорошем и чистом оружие клинят 7 из 10. У нас калаши в армии сколько раз в грязи тонули. За 10 лет не помню чтобы у кого-то автомат заклинило или перекос патрона пошёл.
Да и плюс если калаш у него румынский то это еще чудо что он стрелял после грязи был бы русски калаш то проблем не было
Всем насрать на ваш вонючий ак, но все равно доказывают.. Песок слишком крупный, грязь слишком грязная, руки кривые и тд
0:34 на археологических раскопках в африке нашли АК74, его возраст датируется 1500 лет до нашей эры, уникальный образец пребывал в своей естественной среде хранения примерно 3000 лет и исправно функционирует до сих пор.
Ак74 которому 3000 лет? Ак 74 появился в 1974 году
@@megaminecraftpro2004 Да, KycTuk KycTvev, наверное, имел ввиду не АК 74, а АК 47.
Кринжанул с тебя
Вы забыли уточнить, что на этом калаше была дарственная надпись: Рамзесу от дружбана Миши, по случаю победы при Кадеше......😇🥰
I will try to present a neutral view on this, although i identify as an AR-15 Enjoyer
The AK (contrary to popular belief in this comment section) is a Real AK, manufactured in Romania, with No Significant Difference in terms of Reliability to Russian Production AKs, and the fact that the AK Jammed is because the AK is simply an Open System, Great for Arctic Conditions, but not at all great for mud
And about the AR Passing, I'm not surprised, as it's a Sealed System, Designed to Keep Stuff out
Overall, i still believe that Both are Incredibly Reliable Rifles on it's own accord, and that this test is a good test for the laughs and giggles, because there will be no soldier dumb enough to submerge their Rifles in mud like that
Not intentional, but if you fall or drop your rifle, conditions aren’t controllable. This is a very real threat.
I found this article on problems with the military testing the M4..if it's TRUE it's a serious problem.
www.defenseindustrydaily.com/the-usas-m4-carbine-controversy-03289/
@@wirelessone2986 well, i do believe that Early M4s do have Problems with Reliability, but i believe thet have worked hard to get the reliability problem resolved
@@youraveragereloader649 that article was written in 2018 near the end of the M4's career if its true.
@@wirelessone2986 well, the M4 is still used in the US Military even today, although the Marines have replaced them partially with the M27 IAR
On "AK" the return spring is faulty, it can be seen. He cannot shoot normally even when he is clean. And this is not a Russian "AK".
My Russian AK has a much more energetic return spring.
Best "AK" is Yugoslavian m70
I noticed that too. The absolute state of that poor spring. No wonder it's not closing. Pretty sure the mud is not the problem here.
The spring is supposed to bend in the middle tf are you talking about
@@jacobc722 look closely the bolt carrier doesn't even close when it was clean he forced it. No spring in any ak is that weak
that's no the case. the AK hates mud as much as the AR hates snow and ice period. ruclips.net/video/DX73uXs3xGU/видео.html&ab_channel=InRangeTV
Everybody knows the result in Vietnam.
lets have a rematch with vietnam then...
That was mostly an ammunition issue, specifically the gun powder.
Yeah,ak 47 was better than m16 A1
the star hunter No, the AK was better than the M16, the M16A1 fixed the issues
Princton0 no, the issue was ordanance corp’s decision to switch the powder of the ammo, wasnt the M16s fault
С первого же заряжания недосыл патрона, слабая пружина явно видно. Чтоб так клинил грязь надо вовнутрь накидать, и то не факт что клинить будет .
Второе ак полностью был в воде и в магазин натекло песочной жижи. 15й лежал магазином кверху
Я считаю что в видео все подстроенно чтобы так сказать опустить наш автомат
Так еще магазин был отстегнут, грязь и в магазин и в затвор попал, во вторых Румынский, все таки ценятся сделано в России.
Арсалан Дамдинов ваш автомат хуйня его и опускать не надо он и так опущен если не веришь то поищи ещё подобных видосов на ютубе и в каждом из них калаш сливает мке.
@@gilza_9116 наш? Каким боком он ваш?)) Он принадлежит концерну. У тебя ни капли прав нет на него))) ты даже настоящий калаш купить не можешь, в отличии от американцев 😂😂😂😂😂
Так где подтверждение твоей легенде о супернадежности, Леша?
Таких видосов не один и не два, но постоянно АК почему-то не стреляет ядерными зарядами и не самоочищается от грязи каким-нибудь заколдованным веничком, а клинит
The ak knows your an ar fanboy😂That ak47 was definitely broken before you threw it in the mud brother 🤦🏻♂️
Go on with this conspiracy lol.
Автомат Калашникова какой-то палёный ,он возвратную пружину двумя пальцами вставил чему явно не соответствует действительности.
Он её когда выташил она какая-то переломленная была
Бля, там же написано, что румынский калаш, если российского производства испытывал то было бы заебись
Так Калаш Югославский . Совецкий бы не подвёл
Они херню свою пропихивают, а в итоге калаши наши используют везде.
@@skillteam9866 Где везде? Покажите хоть одно спец. Подразделение США, где этот автомат используется. А то,что у нас ФСО и ФСБ закупает американские M4 и Немецкие HK416 о чем нам говорит? То-то же.
Чет пружина возвратная слабовата у калаша. Да и это не русского производства, не военный.
читать не умеешь?
Whatever loser
Дело не только в возвратной пружине. Пазы были сильно загрязнены, поэтому затвор клинил. Чтобы его сдвинуть, нужно было приложить немалое усилие. Никакая возвратная пружина с таким не справится. В AR меньше щелей, поэтому в затворную группу попало меньше грязи. Но есть и обратная сторона этой особенности: чтобы восстановить работоспособность, АК достаточно промыть в воде, а AR-ку нужно разбирать.
оправдания
ruclips.net/video/DX73uXs3xGU/видео.html
@@Nikolai358, парадокс в том, что промыть сложнее и ненадёжнее.
Вы сравните АК России, АК Китая и АК Румынии . Будете очень удивлены.
Ага
Если написать на Ютуб "тест на загрязнение АК" то ничего не будет, будут видео только зарубежных блогеров и то их мало.
и АК СССР
оригинальный Калаш вам нужен пацаны, а не то говно которое у вас)))))
Тоже так подумал, да и в других видео Концерн Ar засирается сильно
Взяли бы наш АКМ он бы отработал четко а не ето болгаро-венгро-китайское говно
@@userchetotam мне ответили что он румыния))🙄😂😂советы бы шмаляли дай бог))
@@ВладКошарский это румынский ак,мне написали ответ)
hahahaha aga
Girls locker room : "omg Chloe's pics are so cute"
Boys locker room :
This comment is so underrated
😂😂😂😂
i dont get it
Your Confused Right Now
Did the same test twice with 2 different AK’s and 2 different AR’s. My results were way different.
I don’t think these tests prove much but to show who’s an avid fan of either rifle.
The spring of the AK return mechanism is abnormal and very weak, it is impossible to easily erect the AK with two fingers, the AK native spring is very tight and rigid.
@@Webbwulf Russians would've already won if they had those guns
@@Webbwulf Exactly those guns are superior
You didn't saw a lot of captured M4 and M16s by Russian army? Owners of thet rifles can say anything bad about AKs.
for objectivity it was necessary to shoot from a weapon before placing it in the mud
Yeah, this is definitely pretty bad as a scientific analysis.
@Report of the day AKs do fucking do that, they're machines, not designed by God himself
No tool is perfect, and The AK did here what most other weapons could NEVER do, it could still fire while gunked up
I think he did it, but not on camera
@@kaydenchan7093 nope
MrFEARFLASH how do you know? Do you stalk them or something?
As a life long soldier (16 years and counting) in a military that uses a galil variant which is basically a AK in 5.56 i can honestly say that with little use the AR seems to be the superior firearm .
That said i would still personally prefer an AK\galil as my personal firearm, i'd get that AK running in a few seconds , where as im not convinced that issues with an AR could be sorted out as fast.
@We Wuz Waaagh!! ! Agreed!
But in a worse case scenario after a rinse with a canteen , a 6 second strip and quick thorough cleaning of the BOLT will solve any issue.
ARs are the inferior design. They do not compare to AKs.
@@zoltancsikos5604 yep, that's why all the poorest countries field them, because they're the best hahahaha
@@MyFathersBusinessLLC That's the point ak are cheap in compare to what they provide simple and reliable while ar is just too expensive for countries with weak economies or huge armies to upgrade to them
@@zoltancsikos5604 Ak is overrated
Conclusion: whatever gun you are using, don't immerge it in mud.
This reality man, if army use ghillie suit for steal than enemy that gun must immerge it in mud.
Smart 🍪
Я не эксперт конечно, но мне кажется что на АК пол пружины откушено!!!!!!!
+++ я тож так подумал, ощущение словно они с ним что-то сделали, изначально сломали там немного что-то
Надёжность АК это миф в который верят только идиоты которые никогда не применяли его в боевой обстановке.
@@Tsuyoides а ты применял его сам в боевой обстановке?
@@_ZOV_2202 да, применял.
@@Tsuyoides в counter strike?
Там резинка от трусов вместо возвратной пружины?
👍👍👍
😂
Да там и АК китайский, не российского производства.
Просто АК румынский
@@haniballector2853, давайте контакты торговца в США, который китайскими калашами торгует?
Румынский АК это как резиновая женщина
Пусть нормальный калаш возьмут ))
@@ДмитрийИзмаильский а нормальный они теперь наверно хер достанут
>AK fails to extract
>"GUYS IT'S BECAUSE PROMAGS SUCK"
Does anyone in the comments even own a gun?
GayForNoivern Probs not
Pro mags are shit tbh, but my saiga74 has never had an issue, shit I even dumped it in muck and shot 25 rounds out of 30 before a jam, luck of the draw I guess
Holy shit bro ur profile banner is so HOT.
@@SobboMonkeVR I KNOW, RIGHT?
Idk why anyone wouod care to watch this id they dknt own ome of the two
Чё то пружина то слабовата, не? Как всегда, всё по-честному, да?!))))
A round in the chamber before the mud would be more realistic.
real isrealite thats actully dangerous my friend
A gun is not a joke
They did a test after they both were completely cleaned out. Watch the full length video.....
The AK ran just fine clean, as did the AR. No "weak recoil spring" as some Russian commenters were saying.... (Which doesn't make any sense regardless as the issue was a failure to eject...)
These tests have been done time and time again with various AR's (from cheap crap to Russian Arsenals) and the results have been mostly the same as seen here.
The ar would of stoped when the ak did
If he left the dust cover open real world battles the dust cover is open
And I don’t even own a AK and I can say this was not a even test
@@justintornow427 you obviously did not watch the full video
Imagine disliking the video, just because your favorite gun got beaten by an another gun in a fair competition
The dislike of the video is due to the theme of the video "AR vs AK test mud",
because this is: "AR vs WASR mud test".
If you want to compare American and Russian weapons, then use Russian weapons, not Romanian weapons!
If you think this is the same thing, then every American product and its Chinese copy are the same thing and we can use the Chinese version of the product to evaluate the quality of the American version of the product!
@@jerromedrakejr9332 Alright, let me say this, russian fanboy.
First of all, the video or the title didn’t even said “American AR vs Russian AK mud test”, which means that we don’t know whether those two guns were originally an American/Russian version, which means that, that AR and that AK was probably a different foreign version/model (Chinese or Romanian, yeah). Second of all, even though the AK on the video was a “Romanian” or a foreign version, it is still the goddamn same, with only slightly differences on the look, the way it shoots, the way it works, it’s the same.
Like bro, accept the result of a fight, win or lose. The AR beats the AK with no advantages in a fairly fight. I don’t get why toxic people like you complain about it.
@@spinning_ice1487 As someone who is in the army equipped with Soviet/Russian and domestic weapons manufactured according to Russian models, I know that it is not a Russian AK but a Romanian WASR, so I wrote that. At no point did I say what you were quoting "American AR vs Russian AK mud test". Simply, if you mention the AK mark then use Russian weapons. All copies of the Russian AK have their own markings, but obviously it suits you better to compare a shitty copy and state that it is the original. The good quality original and the low quality copy are not the same.
Related to your rude behavior: Russian funboy? Not something special, they didn't really touch my heart ... But as someone who fought against the Americans and all its NATO halflings, I'm definitely not a US/NATO funboy.
On the other hand, apart from the fact that you are a US funboy, obviously you are towards the rest of the world, especially Russia and very likely China, a hateboy ... or you are not more than 9 years old ...
After all, if you think that this comparison is enough to confirm the superiority of AR over AK, feel free to take one AR and come, I'm waiting for you with domestic version of Russian AK - "M". Don't worry, those copies of the Russian AK marked "M" are recognized worldwide as extremely good copies with a quality equal to the Russian AK, but that's why these "M" copies work much better than that Romanian garbage WASR, which are again, in the whole world recognized as extremely bad copies of the Russian AK.
P.S. I had the opportunity to come into possession of the American AR as a war trophy during one of the actions of cleaning the terrain - it was not worth spending energy to carry it, useless garbage...
@@jerromedrakejr9332 Alright, I’m not trying to be interested on your career or trying to change the point of our argument. But did you serve in the Russian Military? Yes or no?
@@jerromedrakejr9332 I would 100% completely trust a norinco ar15 to work for me as well. I have seen them to be extremely reliable, dispite people saying norinco is inferior. Yes of course a kac sr15 will be more reliable, however the norinco is no slouch, a good design is a good design. Not to say the ak is a bad design, but the ar15 is sealed better than the AK is, it has a dust cover and completely seals it off from the environment. I would imagine the ak is better at long intervals without maintainence, but then again, I have seen ar15s with 12000 rounds with no cleaning or lube run without malfunctions.
I have never heard either of these weapons will be reliable with mud and rocks in them... *HOWEVER* where I have heard the AK47 outshines the AR15, is you can take a AK47 over to some undisturbed puddle of water, rinse it out with plain water (or a bottle of water) and with no lubrication will fire reliably. If you were stuck in a jungle with no cleaning kit and no oil, my understanding is the AR15 will eventually not be reliable without the proper things to clean and lubricate. The AK47 only needs some semi clean water. That to me is a huge advantage. In a war, or SHTF scenario, you will likely run out of clean patches, and oil... at that point, you will have only water at your disposal, so will the AR15 operate reliably on only semi clean water? That would be the true test of reliability to me.
Do this same test, but after you pull it out the mud, have a creek or large puddle of water near by, submerge the weapons into the water and manipulate the action while agitating them around to get off as much mud as possible, then after cleaning it the best you can in 30 seconds in that water, shoot them both. Shoot 90 rounds through each and see which one has more reliability issues.
Another test to do would be to remove all lubricants from both weapons and then fire 1,000 rounds through each with no cleaning. Again I will bet the AK47 outshines the AR15 here.
Don't get me wrong, under certain controlled conditions, the AR15 outshines the AK47, but reliability is not one of them. If I was part of a swat team, where we operated in a urban environment, and not likely to shoot more than 300 rounds in a single engagement, I would want a AR15 hands down as the accuracy is better, follow up shots are quicker, and its is typically lighter.
Now if I was going into the woods, and had no idea how long it would be before I could potentially have access to additional oil, cleaning kits, etc, and I could be out there for months or even years, I would want a AK47.
On the short term combat requires a lot of tactic and dynamic, i'd prefer AR-15 pattern, but in large battlefield with lack of supplies, i prefer AK
Conveniently you have clean water when mud is everywhere, yeah right haha. Obviously another dirty puddle wont clear mud from both rifles but sure AK is a bit better in "self cleaning". But you forgot that in case of AR15 you can basically unpin it, open and pour water this way so everything will go out. SHTF scenario is stretching too much to defend your beloved AK by putting it into some drastic hypothetical situation and then making assumption that AK somehow have advantage. Going with mud filled AK without cleaning and lubing will fuck it up anyway too, or make it unreliable. AR15 will obviously function without oil and cleaning patches, and even then unless you wipe out literally everything from earth that is related to civilisation you will still have option to lube and clean it. Perhaps if you go on for years you will run out of lube or other things to clean it in local area but that is still stretching argument into extreme hypothetical situations.
absolutely right!
Они этот АК из АлиЭкспресс заказали
Ewww ccp ali express
С этим ак явно какие то проблемы были изначально...
конечно, а еще мы впереди планеты всей и танки наши быстры
@@lelik502 вас не знаю, так что может быть
Да с ним проблемы были в 1948 г.
Там сильно внутрь попало грязи и розочка забилась
AR guys when AR does bad: Oh, my favourite weapon didn't do good but still i love it.
AK guys when "AK" does bad: proceeds to cry and make excuses
True
Enough of these comments, they’re good on their own ok?
In my opinion, AK is simpler and cheaper design. AR is more advanced. I love both of them, no hate on each one.
100% agree
I agree.
But I thought the shells from the AK were silver... so possibly steel casing? If steel casing is being used I don’t think it’s a good test for either gun. Brass is the way to go. But I do t the the facts of this test.
Both are great machines with their own pros and cons. It's cheaper to feed an AK though, so I prefer it and the sights just work for my aging eyes better.
@@briand4000 I can get the 5.56 NATO surplus far easier and typically cheaper. I opted for a mil spec Tavor,. Fast field strip for cleaning and ammo availability is better for me. $140usd for 500 rounds.
Its fucking chinese ak
Лучше бы спросили у тех кто на рисовых полях АК прятал
Это миф. Сранный русски пиздеж.
Это не АК. Скорее всего какая- то копия. АК перезаряжается гораздо туже, так просто пальчиком на нём пружину не взведёшь.
Разве вы не можете сказать то же самое о AR? Не то чтобы они использовали GI с рейтингом M4. (Sorry, used google Translation)
This happens when the AK is not real. Well, the whole point is that in seconds the AK is completely disassembled, cleaned and assembled in seconds.
The whole thing with AR's not being reliable comes from years back in both Vietnam and when our troops first went into Afghanistan. They have for the most part worked out the kinks and it is pretty reliable now.
The problems with the AR15 (the Colt designation for an off-the-shelf Colt civilian rifle (Model 601) that would later be DOD standardized as the M16 after official adoption) in Vietnam had to do with the rifle having a non chromed chamber and bore and switching from stick to WWII surplus ball powder which increased that the cyclic rate of the rifle caused ejection problems and also caused parts to break. The Army failed to issue cleaning kits and did not train troops in maintaining their weapons. Since the normal procurement and testing process didn't occur before the Army ordered their AR15s, the rifles were basically tested and evaluated in combat in Vietnam.
Ah, plenty of face-saving, plenty of excuses...
Time and time again ARs fail and there's more and more explicit proof of this AR inferiority with the Pakistan rifle trials being just one recent example. The AR-10 failed, but it did have very good accruacy when it did function.
Just one example: A guy in Afghanistan had to use 3 separate M4's during one firefight at his FOB.
"there're many kinds of ARs" is what I use to hear everytime ARs failed as an excuse. Downplaying things and saving-face.
Suddenly, no AR fanboy wants to say "oh this AR did well but we'll see how the rest do." All of a sudden, with something positive, every AR becomes awesome to them.
I could go on and on.
Maintenance...
I won't even bother explaining. But I will point out that you can't assume everything will be put on hold just so you can stop to perform maintenance. This was the case for a group of soldiers in Iraq who drove trucks and ran into issues because they simply don't have the time to stop and baby a rifle that is expected to be used in combat. Doesn't help if you lose a part during disassembly and reassembly either. You can do it all with an AK with your eyes closed, LoL
ARs are still unreliable to this day and still have inferior maintenance. Is it as bad as before? Nah.
@@zoltancsikos5604 Látom te magyar vagy. Az AR román gyártmány lenne? Az AK most is a világ legjobb gepkarabelya és mindig is az volt, nem véletlen hogy kiirtották vele a fel világot sok millió embert. Láttam videót nem rég azt hiszem Pakisztánban a hóhér egész sorozatot eresztett az AK-bol a földre fektetett emberekbe és csak utána haltak meg. 3-4 lövés nem volt elég nem értem az AK ennyire gyenge lenne? Mennyi a kaliberű ? 9mmes? Meg 6-7 lövés után is mozogtak az emberek így egész tárat kellett beleloni
In my last years in the army i used m4, and I've gotta tell as much as i like the gun, shape, accuracy, possibilities. I would still take an ak for war
It's a matter of opinion whether one is better than the other. Personally, I prefer the M4 because that's the weapon platform I am more familiar with, and it is far easier to add attachments. Having a grenade launcher, ir laser sight, nods, acog and forward grip gives you more versatility at the expense of weight. Furthermore, a disciplined soldier would be keeping regular maintenance of his weapon by taking it apart and cleaning it every night or after mission, like brushing ones teeth. For me the only time I'd prefer AK over M4 would be in an apocalyptic situation, but even then I think I'd rather have the weapon I'm the most familiar with.
AR Dust cover opens by mistake in the desert and you are screwed for life.
I beg to differ:
ruclips.net/video/htE91fMUA-s/видео.html
@@_MaZTeR_ didn't really see the point of your argument their, no your not screwed for life but it was an exaggeration in the first place. The ak will do better in sand and dust due to the clearances, the ar is more closed off and will do better in muddy situations. The ar has more small moving parts as well in comparison so it's going to be more difficult when something does go wrong. The ak will be easier to get back to function when field stripped in comparison for this reason. I'd take either into a combat situation both great rifles.
@@masonlaw7628 You didn't even watch the video, did you?
@@masonlaw7628 the AK actually does better in cold, better then the ARcould dver dream
Mud, dirt, sand is where the AR seems to just do better (but no actual soldier would ever put a gun through a situation where the reliability would matter)
When I saw more dislikes I figured the AK must have performed poorly. People like to hold onto their preconceived notions. I own an AK and love it but any machine that has moving parts can fail. Ive always thought the large tolerances actually give more room for dirt to build up.
Dislikes because AK is not real
@Joe Blowe probably...)
@@Filimok look... AK is better in Antarctic conditions like -20 below zero Fahrenheit when the gun is encased in a block of ice, but for ANY other situation including mud and sand I would prefer the close tolerances of the AR keeping out the dirt to the AK's loose tolerances that work the dirt into the gun after a few rounds any day. dry lubes may help AR in SUB ZERO conditions as well.
@Яков Ильиных AR never lets dirt in in the first place. lol nice try. you'll be cleaning for 5 mins while ARs are still in the fight
@Яков Ильиных I agree with you though they both have pros and cons. AKs are cool, so are ARs
Данное видео,достаточно хорошо показывает "надёжность и безотказность" АК.🥴🤔
долбаёб? дед иди пей таблетки
Если что это румынский Ак был
Пришлите им АК с Ижевска.
Сейчас хоть переделанный ак "Вепрь" с Польши.
И потом.... проверните 2 разА.....
У меня с Ижевска вепрь ,1959 года . Без напильника даже не стрелял
Хрен им а не ак с Ижевска,пусть своими ар воюют
У них в Аризоне болгары 47 клепают
Орууу. В калаше пружина от нерфа стоит?
Диванные оружейники на месте :)
Плач плач а что Советский что Российский калаш говно 🌚🌚🌚
@@shadyend5401 диванный эксперт, прошу прощения в хотя бы в руках держали?
@@shadyend5401 там пружину порезали на половину примерно, конечно затвор не будет доходить до конца. А скорее всего это не советский и не российский, а китайский или может румыния, там вообще конструктивно он отличается
Может мне кажется но на ак затвор как то легко открывается , как буд то там пружины нет , а вернее там какая то слабая или пиленная пружина. Так же двигается затвор у страйкбольного ак.
Это потому что ты ДЭБИЛ 🤣.
@@ИсламКураев-ы5ы пошёл нахуй, русня ебаная!
To be fair here , that AK has literally no freaking recoil spring. That spring couldn’t hold a ball point pen open. If it had a much better ALG spring in it I’ll bet you it would’ve done a hell of a lot better.
The AK is designed to be reliable when it comes to everyday dirt not hardcore dirt. However the fact it took the AR basically being made from mud to fire less than 3 rounds before jamming while the AK being dropped in a mud puddle gave it a 2 round shot limit and after that rarely fired proves which is better.
It proves nothing.Change the recoil spring on that AK and put a reliable magazine in it because this one isn't and then do this test again. ON EQUAL TERMS.
Did we watch the same video??
@@biggysnaps2827 Yes we did.
unforatnly you dont seem to know that a ak can be dissasembled into three basics parts easily. the aks that are desigend to work in such enviromental conditions have way heavier springs (which also means more force just to be concret) and those work even in this mud, not to mention that you scrab out the spring very easily without even using specialised tools.
if a ak dosent shoot , its takes a max of 15 seconds to fix that and get back into action.
want to see you do that with a ar 15
@@ael371 I suppose you can't do that with an AR. But then, you don't have to. Why have a gun that's easy to fix a problem with when you can have a gun that doesn't have that problem to begin with? A sealed action keeping mud from getting in is a lot better than one designed to be fixed after getting mud into it.
@@ael371 actually you can do that with AR that’s if you know how to use one but from my personal observation you own a ak so you probably don’t know that people can sort out jams faster than that🎉
Mmm yes i can feel the salt.
Highdelta the spring is weak on ak. This is wasr. A lot of people think this video is right. It’s not. He’s using a cheap ak with cheap spring and parts. I can’t believe the ak even shot how cheap and shitty the wasr is.
It dries up my skin
Very impressive for both guns, but which gun really does better in terms of effectiveness, reliability, and durability?
my point?
Benny A Russian AK wouldn’t magically perform better after being in mud. They all have the same basic design, regardless of what country they’re from. The reason people have always said the AK is so high quality and never fails, is because in Russia, high quality means “easy to fix when it breaks down”, while in America, it means “doesn’t break down”.
When I went through SF training we were on the range firing all US weapons from WWI upto 1970, that included the M-14 and M-16. When we were finished the NCO from weapons committee walked over to a mud puddle and picked up am AK-47 full of mud and water, he pulled up a magazine, inserted it, racked the bolt and let slide forward and pulled the trigger and sent 30 rounds down range. He looked at us and said, "This is the weapon of your enemies!" I never forgot my introduction to the AK-47.
M-14 the best battle rifle ever
@@Manbunmen65no 😂
@@Manbunmen65definitely not
@@Manbunmen65 probably the worst american military rifle
Difference between having a open system vs a closed system
Lots of CLP and the AR is a trooper. Those of us who've been to Iraq or Afghanistan know. Both the AK and AR are great rifles though.
In the moment of truth I don’t care who made it, communist or capitalist. Does it hold rounds? Will it fire? Glad you came back man.
That's right man good to have you back soldier. Would you mind explaining what you meant by clp
@@tonyfierro8642 it's a type of cleaner/lubricant hybrid. Works really well for pretty much any gun but especially for ARs.
@@raptorbadger3131 thanks for the info brother
Yes, those who have used M4s and M16s and those who research it know about the immense issues with reliability and maintenance.
this dude really wore a shirt to a mud test, what a bright spark.
I have a big experience with mud in my soldier times, Mud become a piece of your skin hahaha.
wow... the Chinese AK (or intentionally broken), I don't know what these AR boys wanted to say and prove in the video, but the Kalashnikov is so legendary that every American housewife knows that it is a super hardy and reliable weapon, yes, in general, the AK-74 version is a little less reliable than the AK-47, but if it is the original with of the Russian Izhevsk plant, then it will definitely not behave like in the video, you can find on RUclips how each specimen is tested, they are not only bathed in mud, but also thrown from a height, frozen, sandblasted in a germo-chamber
AK fans are butthurt because "this AK is not true Russian". Actually, all internals are just as same as in Russian AK or Rumunian AK.
AK isn't magical piece of indestructibility and unjammability - it will jam and rust just like all other guns.
I'm actually an AR fan, but you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
Most times all you have to do is remove the dust cover to get it cycling again.
alloy metal !! which does not give gaps! Here is the difference between Russian and Chinese AK
The Chinese make good AKs
@@utilizatorm561 you mean the difference between Russian and Romanian aks. It's like calling your 95 Honda civic a 2018 silverado 6.6l duramax with allison transmission. No exaggeration, they are that different in quality
One argument I always see is, "but you can clean an AK faster than an AR!"
Now that might be true, but you are probably still dead in that time too.
Bottomline is don't get your AK or AR muddy in the first place.
imho-- bottomline, there's NO justification for AKs not being engineered w/ dust cover, that only opens during eject-stroke, then closes itself; THAT would beat the AR; would NOT be rocket science
@Rara Neagra I can have both back together within 5 minutes. Answer?: get both, they are both pretty nice rifles.
@@aptcmpasion There's no justification to dump your rifle into a pile of mud
@@thisaccountwashacked666 right, but, in COMBAT, when you suddenly rcv lots of accurate enemy fire, you may find that you instinctively dropped to the prone in a couple inches of mud. especially true of the Cherries in your unit. very common occurrence.
i love how russians comment about this
Наши люди просто не могут избавится от мифа
@Андрей Серёгин Что калаш типо весь такой крутой. А на самом деле он плохой и устаревший. Его популярность из-за того что советское командование массово продавала их всяким диктаторам и террористом со всего мира. Вот и всё
@Андрей Серёгин Всё подробно расписано в инете. Тут инфы на один коммент не хватит
That AK probably has the same problem when its cleaned up.
Это китайская фуфло а не АК-105.
В Америке выпускают самые дерьмовые ак, потом Китай
Get a real Russian made AK not a homemade American AK
What are you on about? They’re built with the same basic design either way
@@La_Pucelle_dOrleans quality is different
@@scilvaskhumbongmayum3797 If quality is an issue, then the finnish valmet (the highest quality ak) would perform significantly different. It does not. The design if the AK is not good at keeping grime out of its locking surfaces. The quality isn't the issue, the design is. The AR is much more sealed, and can actually keep the mud out.
@@scilvaskhumbongmayum3797 AK is AK even if American made or Russian made lol. U still believe in those Russian lies that the AK can't malfunction which is not true lol. AR is still better than the AK's
Можно смотреть вечно на 3 вещи
Как горит огонь
Как течёт вода
И как русские пытаются защищать свой калашмат в комментариях
Именно
да они пытаються зделать так типо наш лече руский говно
Exactly
Так потому что АК это вещь неубиваемая и вряд-ли из-за какой-то там грязи затвор откидываться не будет так как ещё при войне во Вьетнаме он прошёл любые погодные условия те же болота, грязь, песок ему было поебать и вряд-ли бы он стал настолько культовым автоматом если бы боялся обычной грязи а тут ясен хер что это подделка
Ты видимо дурачек ничего не понимающий в стрелковов оружии. Поверь мне я знаю свое дело.
Honestly, I wouldn't even worry about this because if this happened in an actual firefight, you'd have the rest of you life to fix it!
That is just a dlc pack that changes the look of the ak, it makes it look like an AR-15
Soviet Penguin texture pack*
Sorry aint much of a pc or console player mostly mobile :)
Ohhh ok I get it now, if your in a wet environment a AR is better if its dry the AK is better.
It truly is situational.
Who’s ready to have a serious discussion on metal quality in magazine springs now?
@@the8a9522 yea most people just buy pmags for $15 each and be done with it, the issued ones are garbage but a pmag can feed through a saw no problem
I keep telling all the COD players, the AK is overhyped and it is basically an open door for mud and grime and shit, if you know anything about the basic designs the AK is basically an open to the environment while the AR keep the environment out
AK fans so angry about their rifles.
АХАХАХАХАХАХ, у тебя пружинка там от пистолета стоит? Людям чуть ли пальцы не отрывает возвратная пружина, у тебя они лёгким движением руки ходит :DDD
Вот вот, я тоже заметил
Саня: оторвать может были случаи
People see a mud test and say "oh it wasn't this type" then stop saying the AK-47 is reliable and say the AK-47 with the maple wood and the steel that's folded 1002 times with the lucky rabbits food made in the southeast part of Russia and used by the Spetsnaz is a extremely reliable gun. People always talk how the AK is ultra reliable as if mud doesn't effect mechanical parts the same way. As if every cheap and non cheap AK platform isn't the same platform. The AK-47 is a good gun that is basic and required little care to work good. It packs a punch and is very notorious. Notice I didn't ever call it invincible or infallible.
This is a cheap ak with shitty parts compared to a ar which are very expensive so I dont get your arugement as its retarded, it's like comparing a £100 phone to a £1000 phone
@@mcwaff8661 yeeeeeees, its ROMANIAN cheap trash for 5$ use a nice ak, Lead guitar u just know that ak is better, but still want AR seem more reliable, cause you spread propoganada u pig.
@@frogggy_ wait what?
АК явно не оригинальный и собран из мусора в подвале.
Aren't all aks like that? They're stamped like cheap crap. Supposed to be much cheaper than ars, and they are worse but they cost the same hahahaha.
@@MyFathersBusinessLLC Hello English speaking friend! The real AK is produced at the Izhevsk Machine-Building Plant, I don’t see that this fake was made there, neither the serial number nor the factory stamps were shown to us.
When I was in the army, we already had AKs of the hundredth series, AK 74 is already the last century, and what is shown in the video is half a plastic piece of shit.
There is a reason why powder in your gun jams your rounds over time shooting it. Keeping your gun clean is key and clearly is the problem :O
I'm so glad that I'm not one of those blue-eye AK fanboys who think that rifle works better than any AR rifle in any conditions, or any of those AR fanboys who think that more modern and American can do the job better.
I actually think the both guns have their pros and cons just like any weapon. Plain and simple.
I agree. I mean dude, both are rifles...
Are you that much arrogant or so bad at history to mistake russians for average-looking german?
I’m a bullpup type of guy
Most AR owners I know enjoy and love the AK platform, they just prefer the AR... but it seems its not so much the other way around.
Both rifles are exceptionally awesome. That being said…..after your extreme mud test is comes down to favoritism. Yes I said it. Both guns are great and work best under certain conditions. Anytime mud is packed inside a firearm, it will moSt likely effect the overall shooting quality of the weapon.
ARAK
It's just that one weapon is military, and the other is for the police. Before such tests, show the working condition of the weapon. And then they brought a rusty AK with a broken spring.
It’s actually simpler than that. The bolt cover on the AR wasn’t open. Of course it’s gonna fire flawlessly
@@sebastianbaez-serrano2298 then they opened it and plus what’s the point of buying a gun with the design of if you get stuff into it you can clean out easily but the AR you have a cover for it so you won’t get stuff in it that’s getting a couch that is easy to clean that’s all white but you can also buy a couch that has a wrapping around it so you won’t spill anything on it
Give me both of these . I will clean it and use it . 😭
Dont bay china's copy AK. Its a simple, dude.
Its not a Chinese ak. Also the Chinese make a super nice ak.
@@9716-i7f Chinese, romanian, what ever. All the AK's that non russian, are shit. There is a big diffrence between them, believe me.
Alexander Belov r/whoosh
@@heyman2480 dont eat many fast food and drink Coca-Cola and you not stay fat muricans. Its a simple, dude.
@@Alexander_von_Bock that's where you're wrong. Chinese ak's, (norinco) are among some of the best ones made after russian etc.
AR is a very closed off sealed weapon system. We learn form Vietnam extremely well.
Mud wasn't the issue in Vietnam, at least not like this. The issue was a change in powder and soldiers not being issued cleaning kits.
If you learned something in Vietnam, you wouldn't go to other countries. The whole world already hates you, you have brought so much grief to people in other people's homes. Now the Russians will ask you for everything.
AR-15 - американская полуавтоматическая винтовка под патрон 5,56×45 мм. Выпускается с 1963 года, поступает в продажу в качестве гражданского оружия для самообороны, охоты и т. п, является штатным оружием полиции.
I have been doing mud tests with my ak47s for years and never had that problem. Dropped my AR once in the mud and it was done. You guys set the ak up to fail. Ak47s are known to all ways run no matter what
Every firearm can malfunction, it's not impossible for AKs to do so. Of course, there're American AR fanboys everywhere in these comments jerking-off to this coping propaganda.
Cool story bob
AR-15 is the better weapon
Nelson rodriguez you are correct
The AK is a rifle it will Rust it will Jam it will fail just like many others. It's not some indestructible piece of equipment. It fails sometimes deal with it.
The average Lad so does every other weapon
@@falcon6329 "The Ak is a rifle, it will fail like many others..."
@Your Typical Pinoy I had stated that that AK was like any other rifle, meaning it has it's flaws like any other rifle. I hope that clears the confusion.
@Your Typical Pinoy oh okay.
It wont if it's forged of stalinium in the communist flames of soviet russia.
Вот посмотрел от любопытства. Удивился вашему испытанию. Я прослужил 30 лет и автомат всегда работал безотказно у всего подразделения. Конечно специально в затвор песок не засыпали. Но и при минусовых когда под -20 и в жару +40. И в дождь и в снег. Ну я конечно все видел своими глазами в вашем испытании. Спасибо за видео.
I seen a test with a Russian ak a ar15 and the new Springfield hellion they were frozen and the springfield was the only gun to shoot at all and it fired all 30rds
The 7.62 mm Kalashnikov assault rifle (AK)[4] is a submachine gun adopted in the USSR in 1949; the GRAU index is 56-A-212. It was constructed in 1947 by M. T. Kalashnikov.
AK and its modifications are the most common small arms in the world, it is included in the Guinness Book of Records: there are more than 100 million units of this machine gun, it is in service with 106 countries of the world [5].
To this type (including licensed and unlicensed copies, as well as third-party developments based on AK) belongs up to 1/5 of all small automatic firearms available in the world[6].
Based on the 7.62 mm Kalashnikov assault rifle, a family of combat and civilian small arms of various calibers was created, including AKM and AK74 submachine guns and their modifications, Kalashnikov light machine gun, carbines and smoothbore Saiga rifles and others, including abroad of the USSR.
The total number of all varieties of the Kalashnikov assault rifle in storage and armament of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation for 2013 was 17,000,000 units[7].
It is not an submachine gun. SMGs using pistol caliber ammunition. AK not firing pistol ammo.
@@TheHald It was originally intended to serve as a submachine gun, although it does not fit modern definitions.
AK or AR, can we all agree not to drop our rifles in the mud ? Our lives depend on our rifle after all.
А калаш то не настоящий ))
А какой брать, если оригинал не достать
@@jesseblog198 это оригинал и есть 74года не оригинала нету!!!
Плач плач а что Советский что Российский калаш говно 🌚🌚🌚
@@shadyend5401 ты из цирка сбежал?
бл уже весь мир знает что калаш лучше чем М16 или АР !!
НО только амеры не могут успокоится и выдают всем китайскую копию калаша за Советскую !! какие же жалкие эти люди !
Так то и ар неплохо себя показала
Congrats You find the only bad-assembly AK47 in the world
This is a Russian or Romanian Kalashnikov there is a big difference in quality between them!The original Kalashnikov is made only in Russia at the Izhmash plant in Izhevsk.
It’s the same platform produced under license and same specs. AK has giant tolerances and gaps. Which kill the gun in mud. But it performs slightly better in dusty situation.
@@TarlanT Oh, no!All licenses have expired and all Kalashnikovs produced in Bulgaria, Romania and other countries are not licensed and can be of any quality.The machine may look like a Kalashnikov,or be called a Kalashnikov, but Kalashnikov is only available in Russia. You don't buy a Ford made in Taiwan or a Mercedes made in Brazil.
NOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST NOT USE GENUINE IZMASH '74 AK, ROMANIAN AK ARE CAPITALIST PROPAGANDA!!!!!
1% People complaining about the AK not working before the test
80%Murricans complaining about some guys who said the test is not legit
19%Something else
:)))
MareleAnto you sound mad
@@KIMG69 lol?
Poate fi folosita ca boomerang daca nu mai merge sa impuste
Pai daca esti comunist normal ca te enerveaza faptul ca suA ii e superioara rusiei
That’s what happens when you buy American AKs
any ak*
Lol yeah as if russian made well make any difference
Когда ты открыл крышку у АР то не стал обваливать её грязью, а слегка помочил