Thanks so much. You have made my mathematical world clearer. Excellent explaining. You're 1 of the best. Had I had you for my teacher, I would have been extremely delighted & successful in math. Thank you kindly 👍🏽🙏🏼
Can anybody explain to me please how 0 is a real number if real numbers are those that fit the formula a+bi where a is not equal to 0 and b=0. But we can only get 0 if a=0 in this formula
Zero is Pure Real Number ..... because is the irrational ,,, we say irrational number are all numbers including Zero, may either be negative or positive. But all negatives are not Whole Real numbers 😅. Thank u🙏🙏🙏
(1) the definition of a complex number contradicts to the laws of formal logic, because this definition is the union of two contradictory concepts: the concept of a real number and the concept of a non-real (imaginary) number - an image. The concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number are in logical relation of contradiction: the essential feature of one concept completely negates the essential feature of another concept. These concepts have no common feature (i.e. these concepts have nothing in common with each other), therefore one cannot compare these concepts with each other. Consequently, the concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number cannot be united and contained in the definition of a complex number. The concept of a complex number is a gross formal-logical error; (2) the real part of a complex number is the result of a measurement. But the non-real (imaginary) part of a complex number is not the result of a measurement. The non-real (imaginary) part is a meaningless symbol, because the mathematical (quantitative) operation of multiplication of a real number by a meaningless symbol is a meaningless operation. This means that the theory of complex number is not a correct method of calculation. Consequently, mathematical (quantitative) operations on meaningless symbols are a gross formal-logical error; (3) a complex number cannot be represented (interpreted) in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system, because the Cartesian coordinate system is a system of two identical scales (rulers). The standard geometric representation (interpretation) of a complex number leads to the logical contradictions if the scales (rulers) are not identical. This means that the scale of non-real (imaginary) numbers cannot exist in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system. Consequently, the theory of complex numbers and the use of the theory of complex numbers in mathematics and physics (electromagnetism and electrical engineering, fluid dynamics, quantum mechanics, relativity) represent a gross methodological error and lead to gross errors in mathematics and physics.
Jason is a teacher who makes you create a love for math and science. No match yet on Internet!
Not only is Jason a brilliant mathematician but about the best teacher I have ever seen on video
I agree. I feel as if I am actually sitting in a classroom.
Right up there with Eddie Woo
He isn't a mathemetician, he is an engineer, so it's quite fab he knows so much about mathematics.
@@MsMajoreare you mathematician??
Congratulations, Jason. This is mathematically beautiful.
For real, I always search for your channel whenever I'm going to start with a new topic because you clearly explain every single corner.
Thank you so much!
By the way, what is your official name, if I may ask?
@@jasonmarx9715
visit his website it has all the information
@@MathAndSciencewe love you teacher you did all the best to us .... May God bless you all the time 🙏
Complex number can be used to calculate the field of electromagnetic wave strength. This course is Good for EE degree candidate.
Thank you sir very helpful lecture🎉
Thanks so much. You have made my mathematical world clearer. Excellent explaining. You're 1 of the best. Had I had you for my teacher, I would have been extremely delighted & successful in math. Thank you kindly 👍🏽🙏🏼
Best video on the subject. Superlative.
Man, you are an amazing teacher!!!
You're the best ,,, God bless you.
Thank you!
youre a legend sir, thank you for all of your videos
Thank you for your videos.
Well played sir, thank you!
THANK YOU... SIR...!!!
Thanks sir Jason
Great explanation!! Thank you!!
Good teacher
Thanks for this excellent course but i have a question can we apply the complex numbers in 3 demesional shapes like as sphere (X^2 + Y^2 + Z^2 =R^2).
why did you plot the imaginary numbers in a vertical line and not in any slope or angle?
Thanks allot for the knowledge 🤗
Such a passion for the subject
Thankyou
thanks a lot . good luck
Thanks. From Bangladesh.
amazing videos sir.
tksm
Really nice illustrate
Great lesson !!! Thanks alot
Can you explain why the imaginary axis unit is depicted to have same length with the real axis unit?
Why dont we put a comma (3,i)
Jason,
What is your ultimate goal with making math videos? If you love teaching math, why didn't you become a math teacher? Just curious....
why we don't use i with imaginary part in order pair
Good job, Try to get rid of shadows on your white board by using professional lights.
Thx 😌 💕
Write .....
안녕하세요
Wowww
Can anybody explain to me please how 0 is a real number if real numbers are those that fit the formula a+bi where a is not equal to 0 and b=0. But we can only get 0 if a=0 in this formula
0 is real number because it's not an imaginary number. Everything is real numbers except √-1 which (i).
do you mean zero is not pure real number?
Zero is Pure Real Number ..... because is the irrational ,,, we say irrational number are all numbers including Zero, may either be negative or positive. But all negatives are not Whole Real numbers 😅. Thank u🙏🙏🙏
(1) the definition of a complex number contradicts to the laws of formal logic, because this definition is the union of two contradictory concepts: the concept of a real number and the concept of a non-real (imaginary) number - an image. The concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number are in logical relation of contradiction: the essential feature of one concept completely negates the essential feature of another concept. These concepts have no common feature (i.e. these concepts have nothing in common with each other), therefore one cannot compare these concepts with each other. Consequently, the concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number cannot be united and contained in the definition of a complex number. The concept of a complex number is a gross formal-logical error; (2) the real part of a complex number is the result of a measurement. But the non-real (imaginary) part of a complex number is not the result of a measurement. The non-real (imaginary) part is a meaningless symbol, because the mathematical (quantitative) operation of multiplication of a real number by a meaningless symbol is a meaningless operation. This means that the theory of complex number is not a correct method of calculation. Consequently, mathematical (quantitative) operations on meaningless symbols are a gross formal-logical error; (3) a complex number cannot be represented (interpreted) in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system, because the Cartesian coordinate system is a system of two identical scales (rulers). The standard geometric representation (interpretation) of a complex number leads to the logical contradictions if the scales (rulers) are not identical. This means that the scale of non-real (imaginary) numbers cannot exist in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system. Consequently, the theory of complex numbers and the use of the theory of complex numbers in mathematics and physics (electromagnetism and electrical engineering, fluid dynamics, quantum mechanics, relativity) represent a gross methodological error and lead to gross errors in mathematics and physics.
Привет
Tôi là của bạn
.