the jump between, white puff ski vest in the mountains elite vibes , to full on black leather motorcyclist jacket dirty look , is INSANE but also so architect like
A captivating and unapologetically unique gestalt emerges, adorned with mesmerizingly unconventional glasses, delivering a lecture of profound complexity.
oh wow complex words. but can any of you guys actually design for real people? not just something that looks cool and and intellectual masturbation for the architecture nerds?
It is really ridiculous to have one's preferred style as the ruling style of so called the epoch. The style itself could be novel however, let the history decide if it is the style of the epoch. As modernists did a novel break through and found opportunity to lead their epoch, nevertheless the later one's like postmodernists, brutalists just remained like small clubs. Schumacher keeps trying to get himself in the history by founding a novel style that shapes the epoch. And even this is not the first try. The world has serious problems and the architects are way beyond in this century than the ones on the former century to help solve it. We are really bored of such narcists that keep occupying agenda. Keep designing what you like to design and let the history decide if it is a style of the epoch.
The lecture is so bad that instead of watching the slides , I started wondering what is this guy actually trying to achieve with everything he is doing, says, writes or even wear? Seriously, why all of these? There is no substance in anything he is doing as a person...Also why is he making up styles??
thats how they are man. all these architectural historians and "intellectuals". they use complex words as intellectual bravado just to make themselves seem really smart. reminds me of that annoying guy from the movie the Menu. but the things is a lot of their designs are shit and only a close community of architects can really appreciate. and if you say architecture is also for laymen, they think they have the intellectual high ground to say otherwise.
Wasn't parametricism supposed to be the new modernism with regards to being the new dominant style only a couple of years ago? Now it apparently already needs an upgrade.
lost of interesting things mixed with a lot of really confused things in a weird blob. When the words of Hegel appears in a conference it make perfect sense to me that there is no real meaning. Why is people still quoting Hegel anyhow?
24:36 these tables are actually so important to be able to critique our architectural ‘rules’ and sensibilities. I think a factor that has moved into the international zeitgeist is the suspicion of progress, after all the technological advancement we’re sitting in some sustainability crises. The progressionalists seem to be avoiding the mental strain that’s placing on people, which is part of the reason I think we’re seeing a resurgence of historicism. I’d argue though, that the historicism will exist is super-position with more speculative styles.
Не смотря на всю критику они опередили реальность лет на 300 точно, надеюсь такая архитектура когда нибудь станет массовой за счет роботизации, потому что по другому это построить почти нельзя
is this lecture taking place on skiing slopes?
Taking place after doing loads of cocaine
Is this lecture taking place for real?
There should be good german techno in the background to match the outfit.
Came for the title, stayed for the drip
fit change @ 1:22:20
lol 😭😭
This is like the 1980's vision of the future. Completely irrelevant. And the slides have bad graphic design to match the content.
the jump between, white puff ski vest in the mountains elite vibes , to full on black leather motorcyclist jacket dirty look , is INSANE but also so architect like
Architects are morons.
A captivating and unapologetically unique gestalt emerges, adorned with mesmerizingly unconventional glasses, delivering a lecture of profound complexity.
Ha ha
Your concise, critically informed, advanced-level review provides a versatile yet articulatory understanding
oh wow complex words. but can any of you guys actually design for real people? not just something that looks cool and and intellectual masturbation for the architecture nerds?
@@trollala_555idgaf about rEAl pEOpLE
“looks cool”…
It is really ridiculous to have one's preferred style as the ruling style of so called the epoch. The style itself could be novel however, let the history decide if it is the style of the epoch. As modernists did a novel break through and found opportunity to lead their epoch, nevertheless the later one's like postmodernists, brutalists just remained like small clubs. Schumacher keeps trying to get himself in the history by founding a novel style that shapes the epoch. And even this is not the first try. The world has serious problems and the architects are way beyond in this century than the ones on the former century to help solve it. We are really bored of such narcists that keep occupying agenda. Keep designing what you like to design and let the history decide if it is a style of the epoch.
The lecture is so bad that instead of watching the slides , I started wondering what is this guy actually trying to achieve with everything he is doing, says, writes or even wear? Seriously, why all of these? There is no substance in anything he is doing as a person...Also why is he making up styles??
thats how they are man. all these architectural historians and "intellectuals". they use complex words as intellectual bravado just to make themselves seem really smart. reminds me of that annoying guy from the movie the Menu.
but the things is a lot of their designs are shit and only a close community of architects can really appreciate. and if you say architecture is also for laymen, they think they have the intellectual high ground to say otherwise.
Patrik Schumacher is like Quentin Tarantino for architecture
This is a parody, right?
Damn 2024 Patrik is so sick. Drip on point no cap
1:07:43: Architecture as hyper-wayfinding?
dlw brought me here
Architecture's Andrew "Dice" Clay
Wasn't parametricism supposed to be the new modernism with regards to being the new dominant style only a couple of years ago?
Now it apparently already needs an upgrade.
lost of interesting things mixed with a lot of really confused things in a weird blob. When the words of Hegel appears in a conference it make perfect sense to me that there is no real meaning. Why is people still quoting Hegel anyhow?
Great lecture, really excited about the new work with Brian Harvey. 2024 is going to be a good year.
Patrik is a legend for this
People that call for social housing to be scrapped aren't legends
24:36 these tables are actually so important to be able to critique our architectural ‘rules’ and sensibilities.
I think a factor that has moved into the international zeitgeist is the suspicion of progress, after all the technological advancement we’re sitting in some sustainability crises.
The progressionalists seem to be avoiding the mental strain that’s placing on people, which is part of the reason I think we’re seeing a resurgence of historicism.
I’d argue though, that the historicism will exist is super-position with more speculative styles.
now everyone is unapologetic of being naive and superficial
god I miss the AA
I think parametricism is too expensive to become mainstream. Hadid's artistic vision made them special and now she is gone sadly.
Armin Van Buren of contemporary architecture
Очень дорогой дизайн... как можно строить много, если ни кто не умеет его ни проектировать, ни строить?
Или это что то вроде дольче габана? мало и дорого?
tasteless
yeh they might as well design in fucking minecraft than waste money and make spaces for real people.
VIRGIN MODERNIST
What the fuck is he wearing
Michelin Mon
Не смотря на всю критику они опередили реальность лет на 300 точно, надеюсь такая архитектура когда нибудь станет массовой за счет роботизации, потому что по другому это построить почти нельзя
I think it is BS without content
I can take over Zaha Hadid architects and run it better than this guy he’s so extra