@@cflhardcorekid Yeah I know, but that's what got me interested in computers. Currently running an i7-12700k and an Arc A770 16GB LE GPU. Thanks for sharing.
This presentation looks like it was put together the day before and like it was meant for shareholders. Stumbling over her words. Excluding the tech itself this was awful marketing.
Also I just sold all my Intel stock today, firing Pat with no clear replacement just shouts poor management aswell as this shareholders presentation. AMD with Dell eating more out of client too. There are some really smart and talented engineers working at intel and maybe 18A will workout. I hope it does, but I can't stick with a company that has no 'story' or clear plan.
Compare with NVDC and AMD's presentations, Intel's one was not as juice as others. In addition, INTC's annual report and this presentation were saying generic things like "we are good", we are hardworking" etc. . We saw another Steve Jobs on stage in NVDC's CES keynote while we see very generic presentation in INTC. Hope they can make keynotes and reportes to be more tangible and persuasive next time. Your ball is big, don't drop again.
What a boring, pathetic presentation. A zombie show. That won't create any inspiration and harms the business of Intel. As a Intel user since 40 years I hope they will find a charismatic and capable CEO who is able to turn things around.
How do they have absolutely no vision for the future? They seem to be completely surrendering to nvidia. They aren't even trying to compete in the AI space...... Their manufacturing doesn't mean anything if they have nothing of value to manufacture.
Hello intel, i want to say this to you What if you made a cpu with a peltier module and fixed problems because alot intel users is switching to amd and made a core with alot of thread and core i think of intel failed snd bankrupt amd will buy intel. And what if you outrun amd threadripper, i think you eill make a cpu with 455 threads and 295 cores i thinkits impossible to research it and i dont want to see intel lose and can you make the intel gens like the socket not requiring to upgrade to I3 - i9 because the intel user are switching to amd again about The am4. Please respond.
Comparing NVidia's keynote to Intel's, Intel is dead meat. Intel is focused on latching onto Microsoft's Windows 11 upgrade cycle, fearmongering FUD about not missing cybersecurity improvements that come with a Windows 11 upgrade, and presenting negligible performance increases as big news. (Microsoft's real story is what they are doing with OpenAI and cloud - just look at any of Satya's recent presentations and where they are making huge investments.) NVidia's keynote shows their vision for radically changing the world, from mobile devices (e.g. their car board that Jenson had in his back pocket), to 5090 powered laptops, to desktop computing (their DGX for desktops - which gives a bypass to Intel's anemic performance), to complete racks of equipment delivering world-class supercomputer power that can model complete cities, factories, complex molecular systems, and lots, lots more. And the supercomputers are ready to go - order them with a single part number. And NVidia is making massive investment in open source apps that do all this. Intel's GPUs are blocked from the CUDA framework used by almost every AI researcher (aside from Google's internal use of TPUs). As Jenson said a while back, the competition could give their chips away for free and people would still choose to buy NVidia because of CUDA. Intel presented no plan on how they will compete against that. NVidia delivered 1 million performance improvement to its customers over the last decade, Intel perhaps 0.01% of that (I am being very generous to Intel! See below - it is more like 0.003%.) Intel presented no story or vision for how they will match or beat NVidia's plans for another 1 million performance increase over the next 10 years. Granted NVidia may not achieve quite that much, but it is clear they will do everything they can to pull it off and the whole of NVidia is clearly pulling to make that happen. As part of that, NVidia has stepped up power density of server rack over tenfold, and cloud providers are now doing deals with nuclear power plants to stay up with NVidia's torrential pace. In contrast, Intel is talking about minor power savings on laptops. If you play the two keynotes together, the stark contrast in perception of what matters, strategy, product plans, software investment, partnering and overall outlook is astounding. AI is largely passing Intel by. It is ironic that a company whose name is almost 'intelligence' has been stupid enough to so badly miss the AI revolution. Internally, Intel seems to define themselves as X86, not as a company responsible for delivering price-performance improvements at Moore's Law rates or better. Intel lost their way about 15 years ago. Decade old Intel CPUs provide about the same performance as their latest CPUs. Intel's single core performance is up about 2x over 10 years. Core count is up (generously) by 16x. So that is 32x over the last decade. That is so pathetic compared to earlier Moore's Law rates that Intel delivered! Price-performance always rules computing. Fall off that curve and you are dead. It reminds me when mainframes got eaten by minicomputers, minicomputers by workstation, RISC workstations by X86 PCs, and now we see X86 PCs and X86 servers getting destroyed by far faster GPUs. Without massive, massive refocus, Intel will gradually decay into oblivion. The new co-CEO choices seem to reflect the Board's decision to just milk X86 for all they can until Intel is dead. RIP Intel - it was fun while it lasted (1970's to early 2000's)!
Please don't discontinue ARC GPU
Bring back Pat already.
look ma i'm on tv (34:03 i made Captain Gazman Day Of The Rage)
by emirfail
I would love to see Intel back on top . I've used Intel processors since the days of the 8088.
thats a long time ago there old timer.
And it will be an even longer amount of time before intel would return to top. ARM is the future and AMD had a huge headstart @@cflhardcorekid
@@Dev-n8c4c Not really. The programs and games I run just don't need the latest and greatest. Thanks for sharing.
@@cflhardcorekid Yeah I know, but that's what got me interested in computers. Currently running an i7-12700k and an Arc A770 16GB LE GPU. Thanks for sharing.
I was from i7 4th gen . I didn't remember the year but I had an pata SSD
intel is about to lock in so hard for this new gpu gen
Why is there so much lossy compression?
Microsoft guy, how about you make taskbar hide animation smooth instead of all this AI bs?
Really disappointed that Intel lunar lake architecture will be discontinued.
This presentation looks like it was put together the day before and like it was meant for shareholders. Stumbling over her words. Excluding the tech itself this was awful marketing.
Also I just sold all my Intel stock today, firing Pat with no clear replacement just shouts poor management aswell as this shareholders presentation. AMD with Dell eating more out of client too. There are some really smart and talented engineers working at intel and maybe 18A will workout. I hope it does, but I can't stick with a company that has no 'story' or clear plan.
Compare with NVDC and AMD's presentations, Intel's one was not as juice as others. In addition, INTC's annual report and this presentation were saying generic things like "we are good", we are hardworking" etc. . We saw another Steve Jobs on stage in NVDC's CES keynote while we see very generic presentation in INTC. Hope they can make keynotes and reportes to be more tangible and persuasive next time. Your ball is big, don't drop again.
What a boring, pathetic presentation. A zombie show. That won't create any inspiration and harms the business of Intel. As a Intel user since 40 years I hope they will find a charismatic and capable CEO who is able to turn things around.
How do they have absolutely no vision for the future? They seem to be completely surrendering to nvidia. They aren't even trying to compete in the AI space......
Their manufacturing doesn't mean anything if they have nothing of value to manufacture.
Arrow Lake is perfect for mini PCs/Nucs. If you pair them with an Nvidia graphics card, it will be perfect.
Intel needs to drop DEI and get back to focusing on engineering instead of marketing nonsense.
Hello intel, i want to say this to you
What if you made a cpu with a peltier module and fixed problems because alot intel users is switching to amd and made a core with alot of thread and core i think of intel failed snd bankrupt amd will buy intel. And what if you outrun amd threadripper, i think you eill make a cpu with 455 threads and 295 cores i thinkits impossible to research it and i dont want to see intel lose and can you make the intel gens like the socket not requiring to upgrade to I3 - i9 because the intel user are switching to amd again about The am4. Please respond.
Guys a lot of hopes are on your shoulders, please don't sink Intel if Intel goes out there will no longer be compition
😢 mostly are angry on Intel or just have fomo on hating Intel 😢
Snippy ceo I like Dr. Lisa su from amd more than this lady.
Of course, Lisa is great.
Comparing NVidia's keynote to Intel's, Intel is dead meat. Intel is focused on latching onto Microsoft's Windows 11 upgrade cycle, fearmongering FUD about not missing cybersecurity improvements that come with a Windows 11 upgrade, and presenting negligible performance increases as big news. (Microsoft's real story is what they are doing with OpenAI and cloud - just look at any of Satya's recent presentations and where they are making huge investments.)
NVidia's keynote shows their vision for radically changing the world, from mobile devices (e.g. their car board that Jenson had in his back pocket), to 5090 powered laptops, to desktop computing (their DGX for desktops - which gives a bypass to Intel's anemic performance), to complete racks of equipment delivering world-class supercomputer power that can model complete cities, factories, complex molecular systems, and lots, lots more. And the supercomputers are ready to go - order them with a single part number. And NVidia is making massive investment in open source apps that do all this.
Intel's GPUs are blocked from the CUDA framework used by almost every AI researcher (aside from Google's internal use of TPUs). As Jenson said a while back, the competition could give their chips away for free and people would still choose to buy NVidia because of CUDA. Intel presented no plan on how they will compete against that.
NVidia delivered 1 million performance improvement to its customers over the last decade, Intel perhaps 0.01% of that (I am being very generous to Intel! See below - it is more like 0.003%.) Intel presented no story or vision for how they will match or beat NVidia's plans for another 1 million performance increase over the next 10 years. Granted NVidia may not achieve quite that much, but it is clear they will do everything they can to pull it off and the whole of NVidia is clearly pulling to make that happen. As part of that, NVidia has stepped up power density of server rack over tenfold, and cloud providers are now doing deals with nuclear power plants to stay up with NVidia's torrential pace. In contrast, Intel is talking about minor power savings on laptops.
If you play the two keynotes together, the stark contrast in perception of what matters, strategy, product plans, software investment, partnering and overall outlook is astounding. AI is largely passing Intel by. It is ironic that a company whose name is almost 'intelligence' has been stupid enough to so badly miss the AI revolution. Internally, Intel seems to define themselves as X86, not as a company responsible for delivering price-performance improvements at Moore's Law rates or better. Intel lost their way about 15 years ago. Decade old Intel CPUs provide about the same performance as their latest CPUs. Intel's single core performance is up about 2x over 10 years. Core count is up (generously) by 16x. So that is 32x over the last decade. That is so pathetic compared to earlier Moore's Law rates that Intel delivered! Price-performance always rules computing. Fall off that curve and you are dead. It reminds me when mainframes got eaten by minicomputers, minicomputers by workstation, RISC workstations by X86 PCs, and now we see X86 PCs and X86 servers getting destroyed by far faster GPUs. Without massive, massive refocus, Intel will gradually decay into oblivion. The new co-CEO choices seem to reflect the Board's decision to just milk X86 for all they can until Intel is dead. RIP Intel - it was fun while it lasted (1970's to early 2000's)!
What about AMD?
Sweating such a wall of text as if you've single-handedly shorted entire float of $INTC stock.
So you’re saying don’t go all in?
AMD forever!
Titanic musicians ...
Dead company
Intel already dead