So, Harold Schmeckle's "argument" against Fluoride is not a real argument. What he says should make no sense to anyone who listens, but this reporter and this report is giving equivalence and legitimacy to an old man's misguided musings. This is not a serious report.
Fluoride is toxic in high enough amounts. Some cities put far more fluoride in the water supply than they need to. Fluoride helps teeth topically, not digestively. You will get much more fluoride in toothpaste than you will from the water.
A study showed that removing fluoride increases teeth decay, specifically in children.
Fluoride is GOOD FOR YOU!
So, Harold Schmeckle's "argument" against Fluoride is not a real argument. What he says should make no sense to anyone who listens, but this reporter and this report is giving equivalence and legitimacy to an old man's misguided musings. This is not a serious report.
Fluoride is toxic in high enough amounts. Some cities put far more fluoride in the water supply than they need to. Fluoride helps teeth topically, not digestively. You will get much more fluoride in toothpaste than you will from the water.