Hadith Needed!? Adnan Rashid & Mohammed Hijab & Visitors | Speakers Corner | Hyde Park
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
- Brother Adnan & Muhammad Hijab explain to some visitors why the Hadith are so important and needed from clear cut proof from the Quran
MashaAllah I see these 2 beautiful faces and it makes my day. May Allah preserve these brothers as they strive in your way and may you ease their hardships and align their affairs. Ameen
ruclips.net/video/JCPp8Pq4AYM/видео.html
I have such a deep love for other Muslims, I legitimately see them as family members. Even if I've never seen the person before I still get a warm glow of familiarity and comfort. Islam is unbelievably beautiful.
@@billbailey1511 Indeed.. this is a sign of Imaan. May Allah protect you from every evil and grant goodness in this life and next. 🤲🏽
@@shahid8545 Mashallah thank you brother, May Allah grant you the same. 🤲🏻
@@billbailey1511 ameen akhi ❤
As for those who have divided their religion and broke up into sects, you shall have nothing to do with them. Their case rests with God, then He will inform them of what they used to do. 6:159
/My response to one video/
The first divided sect of this Ummah.
These deceivers hide the fact that
In AlQuran the first divided sects
Are those who wanted orders
To be allowed for them to give,
While even Prophet was ordered
By God to say (in ayat 3:154 that)
"Indeed, AlAmr all of it is for Allah"
I.e. only Allah can give the Order(s),
No one else has right to make orders,
And that's why when we may do fights,
We're ordered to make peace but if not,
If the oppressor isn't coming to peace,
We should fight the oppressor "until
They come to Amrullah"/49:9-10,
until they come to Order of Allah,
Not said order of Allah & Prophet,
And also in whatever we disagree,
Its ruling is only to be to Allah/42:10.
Now we've also the verse 4:59,
Where we're ordered to obey
Allah and His messenger
And foremost in order,
I.e. those who obey
Orders of Allah best
Cuz order is from Allah,
Prophet can't make order,
Nothing of it is to him/3:128,
So he'd order only from orders
Of God, that's why whoever obeys
The Messenger has obeyed God/4:80.
So we can obey the Messenger
From obeying the God alone.
Why is there a necessity to
Say "obey the Messenger"?
Cuz if there's said obey Allah,
People could go around seeking
Other means than from the Quran,
Seeking orders of God elsewhere,
While saying obey the Messenger,
Directs us to come to him & Quran
I.e. to come to Quran through him
Cuz he brought Quran and recited
we got Quran through the Prophet,
That's why there's called to him
And to Quran, cuz he brought it,
Not others, which may make fake
Qurans and claim it to be from God.
Just as Hadithers made fake Qurans
(Readings) and recite them as Quran,
Trying to give legislation to Taghut i.e.
To false gods, false objects of worship,
For which God gave no authority/4:60-61.
Deluded from Quran is deluded/51:9,
So these sunnis are the deviant sects.
If Allah teaches there're all examples
In AlQuran/18:54, they at once say "no,
No example of the Prophet & his orders,
No example of Salah, Zakah, Hajj so on"
Beware that these are Quran Rejectors.
Divided sunnis are not Muslms at all.
They've nothing with the Prophet,
Their affair is to Allah/6:159.
Fussilat 41:6
قُلْ إِنَّمَآ أَنَا۠ بَشَرٌ مِّثْلُكُمْ يُوحَىٰٓ إِلَىَّ أَنَّمَآ إِلَٰهُكُمْ إِلَٰهٌ وَٰحِدٌ فَٱسْتَقِيمُوٓا۟ إِلَيْهِ وَٱسْتَغْفِرُوهُۗ وَوَيْلٌ لِّلْمُشْرِكِينَ
Say, [O Muhammad], "I am only a man like you to whom it has been revealed that your god is but one God; so take a straight course to Him and seek His forgiveness." And woe to those who associate others with Allah
/My response to another video/
Sunnis abusing Quranic verses.
Poor guy, he doesn't know Quran well so he's easily deluded by these faasiqoon slaves of Taghut, by their repititive same deceptions of taking verses out of context, and equating words of God to human words, total shirk yet he's blinded easily.
16:44 is about clarifying Quran by itself, cuz Zhikr is revealed for him to clarify what's revealed i.e. the Zhikr itself, and cuz if we don't know, we can ask the AhluzhZhikr (People of the Reminder), which is literally taught in the previous verse/16:43-44, and people of the Scripture were supposed to clarify but they did not/3:187, so Prophet reciting Quran was itself the clarification as taught in surah AlBayyinah (chapter The Clarification) in verses 98:1-3, that Bayyinah was done by Prophet reciting the purified verses, cuz AlQuran itself is a clarification of all things/16:89, and as we can ask the people of the Reminder, it clearly shows that it was not only for the Prophet to clarify the verses, and we should ask people of the Reminder, cuz they would clarify with the Reminder (i.e. The Book) itself, cuz the Book is the Clarification, Quran itself is called Mubeen (Clear)/12:1, what's wrong with you people? It doesn't need anything else to clarify it, Allah teaches in 24:18, that He clarifies His verses to us, and shows in 24:58-61 how He clarifies Quran with Quran in Quran itself, so God Himself has clarified AlQuran already in AlQuran itself, so Prophet's duty is only to deliver the Message (Balaagh) as taught in 5:99, and the Zhikr is the Book/41:41, and the Balaagh is AlQuran itself/14:52, just read AlQuran for the clarity, Allah taught that upon Him is the clarity/75:19, Allah taught that He taught the clarity to each man/55:4,
so in short, the verse 16:44 is about Prophet being given the Quran to clarify itself, by his reciting it, and he has already recited and made it clear, he already delivered the message fully, so he left, his duty is over, so we don't need him now, we already have the Quran the Clarity.
59:7 is about the things of the world as verse 42:36 clarifies that whatever we're given (the same word as in 59:7) is the thing of the world, and if he honestly read the full verse 59:7, you could see the verse speaking about the war goods, which are not for the rich but for the poor mentioned in the next verse 59:8, so they have their context, in both cases, the particular contextual war goods case and in general sense it's still referring to be for the poor in 59:8 and it's still about the things of the world 42:36, so are Ahadith not for the rich but only for the poor? And are Ahadith a worldly thing? What about Quran? So isn't it from which Prophet gave? Is Quran worldly now? Make up your minds, that's not making sense what they're saying cuz they're taking it out of context.
53:3-4, again keep the context and read till 53:10, can you now say that it's about your Hadiths? Where is any of your tafseer saying that 53:10 is about Hadiths? You may end up saying it's just historical and for that time revelation (of Quran) alone, not all times. And the mighty in power made it known into his heart which is about Quran alone as seen by verses 2:97 -> 2:89, and verse 42:52 makes it clear that what's made wahi to our Prophet is Quran alone and faith (into it), he had no other wahi. And by 53:3-4 we learn that he wouldn't speak from his desire but he'd incline to Truth (As Abraham inclined to Truth as Hanifa/6:161), and thus he would incline to Quran alone, and form Quran alone he spoke, that's what's meant there, so he doesn't speak from his desire, but it's a revelation revealed, which he inclines to speak from, and Prophet isn't infallible/47:19, and he was even rebuked in 66:1 when he made Haram what Allah made Halal to please his wives, tho he had right but God knows what's better, so Prophet has to obey God, just imagine, if it was as you people claim, as if Prophet spoke everything from wahi, would it mean that God spoke to his wives through him while he was in bed with them? It makes no sense, he has his free space, so clearly the verse 53:4 is about Quran, no other wahi beyond that to our Prophet, which I clearly checked all 70 verses using that word and I didn't find any Wahi beyond Quran to our Prophet, while I clearly found many verses teaching that Quran is the Wahi such as 10:15, 6:19, 18:27, 42:7 so on.
So now it became clear that these people are faasiqoon, so I hope I've clarified that their sect is based on nothing but mere fantasies and deceptions, for 49:6, I hope this answers enough.
Follow the Prophet
Is about following Quran, i.e. his Path.
You can't follow the Prophet
In a sense of doing whatever
He would do, say and hint at.
You can't marry as he married
Also you can't die as he died.
You can't marry his wives,
You can't lie in his grave.
He has his own manner.
And Prophet was rebuked
In AlQuran several times,
In verses 66:1, 80:10, 9:43,
(So 53:4 is about just Quran).
And Prophet would follow only Quran,
He had no other Quran, as seen 10:15,
While sunnis made up other Qurans,
Their Ahadith, Quran means Reading,
And they want other Readings/ Books.
And in ayat 6:153, we can clearly see
That only Quran is the Path of Allah,
And we shouldn't follow other ways,
Or we will be separated from His Path.
"How did Quran come to you?"
it's not important, it could also come on the back of donkeys, it doesn't mean that we should follow the donkeys but the Book.
The world is proof for the Book, just like I could as well find it in a cave, it doesn't matter who wrote or put it there, if I decode and understand the language of Quran, and I see that it makes sense and has much of miracles connected to the world, making the world proof for Quran, why should I reject it? So it doesn't matter who brought it, what matters is the content.
And I've read whole AlQuran, and I found no error or any wrong teaching in it, while I found lots of errors and wrong teachings in so called sunni Ahadith, in short for example Bukhari contradicts Quran 4:62 even from his Hadith number 1, why do I even need to continue? When I investigated the 1st Hadith of Bukhari itself I found it to contradict 100s of Quranic verses, by around 20 errors, and at each 7 Hadiths of Book 1 of Bukhari, I found at least by 3 mistakes in my first investigation, why shall I even rely on those joke books?
An-Nisa' 4:82
أَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُونَ ٱلْقُرْءَانَۚ وَلَوْ كَانَ مِنْ عِندِ غَيْرِ ٱللَّهِ لَوَجَدُوا۟ فِيهِ ٱخْتِلَٰفًا كَثِيرًا
Then do they not reflect upon the Quran? If it had been from [any] other than Allah, they would have found within it much contradiction.
"O people, exchange greetings of peace, feed the people, and be in prayer when others are asleep, you will enter paradise in peace."
WiindRider that’s in hadeeth brother
@@syedqayamuddinabrar4525 (2:42!)
They love to mix Baatil to Haqq,
For which they've no proof at all
They didn't do the basic challenge
To give 4 witnesses for Hadiths/24:13,
All of their Hadiths are of 1 chains pft,
only one so called "scholar of Hadith"
Responded to me by giving some men
Who came 300 years later as witnesses?
That's how they trick you, they've no proof.
While Hafs Quran has 4 witnesses,
So do they know better than Hafs?
Why didn't they give 4 witnesses
For any of their Hadith? So Dhaif.
And they tell us to follow those
Which they don't even know?
Allah ordered us to not follow
That of which we've no knowledge
About/17:36, Prophet and his followers
Followed in vision/12:108, not said blindly.
And there are all examples in AlQuran
Which makes their Ahadith useless,
So Prophet wouldn't need to say
Anything else than Quran/18:54.
Reciting Quran is the Clarification
As it is the Clarification of all things,
So Prophet would just recite to clarify.
No need to add anything else to Quran,
As we can ask the reminders of Quran,
The AhluzhZhikr not just Prophet/16:43,
But those before hid the Scriptures/6:156
making up fake Scriptures (Bibles)/2:79,
While they were told to clarify it/3:187,
So Prophet recited to clarify Quran,
But if he didn't, Quran would remain
Unknown and hidden from the people,
his sole duty was to deliver Quran/5:99.
AlQuran (Surah An-Nahl) 16:89-90.
وَيَوْمَ نَبْعَثُ فِى كُلِّ أُمَّةٍ شَهِيدًا عَلَيْهِم مِّنْ أَنفُسِهِمْۖ وَجِئْنَا بِكَ شَهِيدًا عَلَىٰ هَٰٓؤُلَآءِۚ وَنَزَّلْنَا عَلَيْكَ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ تِبْيَٰنًا لِّكُلِّ شَىْءٍ وَهُدًى وَرَحْمَةً وَبُشْرَىٰ لِلْمُسْلِمِينَ
And [mention] the Day when We will resurrect among every nation a witness over them from themselves. And We will bring you, as a witness over these. And We have sent down to you the Book as clarification for all things and as guidance and mercy and good tidings for the Muslims.
إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَأْمُرُ بِٱلْعَدْلِ وَٱلْإِحْسَٰنِ وَإِيتَآئِ ذِى ٱلْقُرْبَىٰ وَيَنْهَىٰ عَنِ ٱلْفَحْشَآءِ وَٱلْمُنكَرِ وَٱلْبَغْىِۚ يَعِظُكُمْ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَذَكَّرُونَ
Indeed, Allah orders justice and good conduct and giving [help] to relatives and forbids immorality and bad conduct and oppression. He admonishes you that perhaps you will be reminded.
AzhZhirk (The Reminder) given to us
(Through it being given to the Prophet)
Can't be other than Quran by definition,
Cuz the Zhikr should be reminded over,
& repeatedly remided and it's by tilawah,
& AlQuran is given to do tilawah/18:27,
Prophet had nothing else to recite,
But only one Quran as taught:
AlQuran (Surah Yunus) 10:15
وَإِذَا تُتْلَىٰ عَلَيْهِمْ ءَايَاتُنَا بَيِّنَٰتٍۙ قَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ لَا يَرْجُونَ لِقَآءَنَا ٱئْتِ بِقُرْءَانٍ غَيْرِ هَٰذَآ أَوْ بَدِّلْهُۚ قُلْ مَا يَكُونُ لِىٓ أَنْ أُبَدِّلَهُۥ مِن تِلْقَآئِ نَفْسِىٓۖ إِنْ أَتَّبِعُ إِلَّا مَا يُوحَىٰٓ إِلَىَّۖ إِنِّىٓ أَخَافُ إِنْ عَصَيْتُ رَبِّى عَذَابَ يَوْمٍ عَظِيمٍ
And when Our verses are recited to them as clear evidences, those who do not expect the meeting with Us say, "Bring us a Quran other than this or change it." Say, [O Muhammad], "It is not for me to change it on my own accord. I only follow what is revealed to me. Indeed I fear, if I should disobey my Lord, the punishment of a tremendous Day."
قُل لَّوْ شَآءَ ٱللَّهُ مَا تَلَوْتُهُۥ عَلَيْكُمْ وَلَآ أَدْرَىٰكُم بِهِۦۖ فَقَدْ لَبِثْتُ فِيكُمْ عُمُرًا مِّن قَبْلِهِۦٓۚ أَفَلَا تَعْقِلُونَ
Say, "If Allah had willed, I would not have recited it to you, nor would He have made it known to you, for I had remained among you a lifetime before it. Then will you not reason?"
فَمَنْ أَظْلَمُ مِمَّنِ ٱفْتَرَىٰ عَلَى ٱللَّهِ كَذِبًا أَوْ كَذَّبَ بِـَٔايَٰتِهِۦٓۚ إِنَّهُۥ لَا يُفْلِحُ ٱلْمُجْرِمُونَ
So who is more unjust than he who invents a lie about Allah or denies His signs? Indeed, the criminals will not succeed.
Criticism of the statement:
"O people, exchange greetings of peace, feed the people, and be in prayer when others are asleep, you will enter paradise in peace."
"O people", manner copied from Quran, as who has right to command people except Allah? Only Allah has right for that, so Prophet had no right to make up any command other than what Allah revealed which is all in AlQuran alone/17:88-89.
... إِنَّ ٱلْأَمْرَ كُلَّهُۥ لِلَّهِۗ .../3:154
لَيْسَ لَكَ مِنَ ٱلْأَمْرِ شَىْءٌ .../3:128
"exchange greetings of peace," (note a peace greeting should be done by actions, not just in words, cuz words don't matter if your action doesn't show any peace, so it's useless to command to do it, while it's an obvious thing by logic, what is sane is already taught in Quran to greet with the best greeting (or better) or to return (or similar)/4:86, shows that humans already have a greeting, this again shows that Quran is more wise in speech than the proveless Ahadith.
"feed the people," which people? There are people who already have provisions but not give from it to the poor but rather oppress them, who rather deserve to be starved, and it's of choice for some to be hungry as by fasting, so that Hadith may lead to some insane actions of forced feeding if taken generally, so that Hadith is made up by devils to sound fancy while it's a mere weak statement, and ignorants may just try to cover it up by adding other words not said there trying to justify the Satanic Hadith of supporting the criminals.
"and be in prayer when others are asleep," that's selfish, making others sleep while you pray, instead of sleeping in a disciplined sleep, and won't he teach his family to do that? So how can others sleep then? It makes no sense, again shows a weak minded speech invented by some low IQ Hadithers, which has nothing to do with the Prophet, again to sound fancy by decorating their speeches.
"you will enter paradise in peace."
So far, this haughty manner to order people stuff which make no sense such as ordering to greet with peace, while it's an obvious and sane thing to do, and we shouldn't even give peace to those who don't give peace, which would merely lead to be some soy or hippy losers while they oppress people.
So that hadith is arrogantly ordering to allow oppressors to oppress and to feed the oppressors and seek to pray while putting your people to sleep selfishly, that makes no sense, and does that lead to Paradise? I don't think so, it's just a made up speech of devils which has nothing to do with the Prophet.
AlQuran (Surah Al-An'am) 6:112
وَكَذَٰلِكَ جَعَلْنَا لِكُلِّ نَبِىٍّ عَدُوًّا شَيَٰطِينَ ٱلْإِنسِ وَٱلْجِنِّ يُوحِى بَعْضُهُمْ إِلَىٰ بَعْضٍ زُخْرُفَ ٱلْقَوْلِ غُرُورًاۚ وَلَوْ شَآءَ رَبُّكَ مَا فَعَلُوهُۖ فَذَرْهُمْ وَمَا يَفْتَرُونَ
And thus We have made for every prophet an enemy - devils from mankind and jinn, inspiring to one another decorative speech in delusion. But if your Lord had willed, they would not have done it, so leave them and that which they invent.
I just realized that most Quranic group are Indian/ Pakistani, and most shia are Iranians, and Arabic is not their first language.knowing Arabic is the key of understanding Quran and hadiths.
All ur major scholars were non-arab. Bukhari, muslim, Abu Dawood, alghazali, al thirmidi. All of them were Persians and asians. So you have just shot yourself in the foot by.claimi g that the heads of ahlul sunnah are non-arab meaning they didn't understand the Hadith nor quran. When your own logic destroys you.
_"knowing Arabic is the key of understanding Quran and hadiths"_
You are implying that *GOD ALMIGHTY, CREATOR OF ALL NATIONS AND LANGUAGES* revealed His message to be understood and explained only by those who are Arabians...
Hussain althalmi he said knowing Arabic... just because they’re not Arabs does not mean they don’t know Arabic
Yes. This disease started in the indo-pak region. Adnan has made a series on this channel refuting these Quranists
Damn u got roast so bad u cant even write a single reply
I loved the end of the video, where the camera continues to roll organically. You see the brothers say good bye and then you see Mohammed Hijab walk off into the distance to distant sound of chanting. It was legitimately "movie-esque". I half expected to see credits start rolling on screen lol. Great vid and I don't know whether it was intentional but very cool unique ending! Mashallah.
Quran: "then in which Hadith
After Allah and His ayats
Will they believe?"/45:6.
Divided Sunni: "Bukhari
and this and that Hadith"
Quran: "these are the verses
Of the clear Book"/12:1.
Divided Sunni: "no,
Quran isn't clear"
Quran: "We have certainly
Diversified in this Quran
From all examples"/18:54.
Divided Sunni: "no,
Not all examples"
Quran: "He that is Who has
Revealed to you the Book
Explained in detail"/6:114
Divided Sunni:
"Quran has no all the details,
No detail of the Prophet's life,
No detail of how to pray so on".
Quran: "O Prophet why do you
Prohibit which Allah made lawful
To please your wives?"/66:1
Divided Sunni: "whatever Prophet
Said and did was all from wahi".
For 16:44
see 16:43, 3:187 & 12:1, 16:89, 5:99.
For 4:59
see 4:60, 3:128, 3:154, 12:39-40, 42:10.
For 4:65
see 4:60-65, 4:105, 6:114, (12:40).
For 59:7
see 42:36, 6:159, 5:99, 10:15, 41:6.
For 53:3-4
see 53:10, 42:52, 2:93 & 2:89, 6:19.
Context destroys their fake tafseers,
They're not scholars but clear scams.
Brother Adnan Rashid is on another level. Truly a brilliant mind.
AlQuran
is an explanation of all things/12:111,
And a clarification for all things/16:89.
And it's clear & fully detailed/12:1, 6:114.
So Prophet doesn't need to add anything,
He can simply recite and that's the clarity,
& that's what he would do to clarify Quran
Which is revealed to the people as Zhikr,
By simply reciting it as taught in 98:1-3.
As the sole duty of the Prophet
Is to deliver the Message/5:99.
(Cuz if Prophet didn't recite AlQuran,
AlQuran may have remained hidden,
So he has to recite for it to be clear.)
& the previous 16:43 verse before 16:44
Shows that we can even ask AhluzhZhikr
So the clarity isn't only for the Prophet a.s.
But AhlulKitaab didn't clarify the Book,
While they were charged to clarify that
But they hid it and made up fake Bibles
/3:187, 6:156, 2:79.
People who ignore the context
Are the ones trying to twist that.
There are all examples in AlQuran/18:54,
This itself makes other sources needless.
And there's nothing like Quran,
While they lie as if their Hadiths
Are like it, they're denying Quran,
Thus they're the Quran Rejectors.
AlQuran (Surah Al-Isra') 17:88-89
قُل لَّئِنِ ٱجْتَمَعَتِ ٱلْإِنسُ وَٱلْجِنُّ عَلَىٰٓ أَن يَأْتُوا۟ بِمِثْلِ هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ لَا يَأْتُونَ بِمِثْلِهِۦ وَلَوْ كَانَ بَعْضُهُمْ لِبَعْضٍ ظَهِيرًا
وَلَقَدْ صَرَّفْنَا لِلنَّاسِ فِى هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ مِن كُلِّ مَثَلٍ فَأَبَىٰٓ أَكْثَرُ ٱلنَّاسِ إِلَّا كُفُورًا
Say, "If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants."
And We have certainly diversified for the people in this Quran from every [kind of] example, but most of the people refused except disbelief.
Adnan rashid is the real lion of speakers corner: no whatever the topic is. He shows why islam is the true religion! Alhamduilah
He is a deceiver and a hypocrite. Spreading lies about the Prophet and slandering Allah
AlQuran
is an explanation of all things/12:111,
And a clarification for all things/16:89.
And it's clear & fully detailed/12:1, 6:114.
So Prophet doesn't need to add anything,
He can simply recite and that's the clarity,
& that's what he would do to clarify Quran
Which is revealed to the people as Zhikr,
By simply reciting it as taught in 98:1-3.
As the sole duty of the Prophet
Is to deliver the Message/5:99.
(Cuz if Prophet didn't recite AlQuran,
AlQuran may have remained hidden,
So he has to recite for it to be clear.)
& the previous 16:43 verse before 16:44
Shows that we can even ask AhluzhZhikr
So the clarity isn't only for the Prophet a.s.
But AhlulKitaab didn't clarify the Book,
While they were charged to clarify that
But they hid it and made up fake Bibles
/3:187, 6:156, 2:79.
People who ignore the context
Are the ones trying to twist that.
There are all examples in AlQuran/18:54,
This itself makes other sources needless.
And there's nothing like Quran,
While they lie as if their Hadiths
Are like it, they're denying Quran,
Thus they're the Quran Rejectors.
AlQuran (Surah Al-Isra') 17:88-89
قُل لَّئِنِ ٱجْتَمَعَتِ ٱلْإِنسُ وَٱلْجِنُّ عَلَىٰٓ أَن يَأْتُوا۟ بِمِثْلِ هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ لَا يَأْتُونَ بِمِثْلِهِۦ وَلَوْ كَانَ بَعْضُهُمْ لِبَعْضٍ ظَهِيرًا
وَلَقَدْ صَرَّفْنَا لِلنَّاسِ فِى هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ مِن كُلِّ مَثَلٍ فَأَبَىٰٓ أَكْثَرُ ٱلنَّاسِ إِلَّا كُفُورًا
Say, "If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants."
And We have certainly diversified for the people in this Quran from every [kind of] example, but most of the people refused except disbelief.
[Quran 13:40] Your ONLY mission (O Muhammad)is to deliver (Quran), while it is we who will call them to account.
[Quran 42:48] You (O Muhammad) have no duty EXCEPT delivering (Quran).
[Quran 5:99] The messenger has no function EXCEPT delivering (Quran).
Yet they treat him as all knowing and infallible. In other words... Shirk
Quran: "then in which Hadith
After Allah and His ayats
Will they believe?"/45:6.
Divided Sunni: "Bukhari
and this and that Hadith"
Quran: "these are the verses
Of the clear Book"/12:1.
Divided Sunni: "no,
Quran isn't clear"
Quran: "We have certainly
Diversified in this Quran
From all examples"/18:54.
Divided Sunni: "no,
Not all examples"
Quran: "He that is Who has
Revealed to you the Book
Explained in detail"/6:114
Divided Sunni:
"Quran has no all the details,
No detail of the Prophet's life,
No detail of how to pray so on".
Quran: "O Prophet why do you
Prohibit which Allah made lawful
To please your wives?"/66:1
Divided Sunni: "whatever Prophet
Said and did was all from wahi".
They are the obvious Quran Rejectors.
For 16:44
see 16:43, 3:187 & 12:1, 16:89, 5:99.
For 4:59
see 4:60, 3:128, 3:154, 12:39-40, 42:10.
For 4:65
see 4:60-65, 4:105, 6:114, (12:40).
For 59:7
see 42:36, 6:159, 5:99, 10:15, 41:6.
For 53:3-4
see 53:10, 42:52, 2:93 & 2:89, 6:19.
Context destroys their fake tafseers,
They're not scholars but clear scams,
their sect is clearly an uprooted false.
Al-Isra' 17:81
وَقُلْ جَآءَ ٱلْحَقُّ وَزَهَقَ ٱلْبَٰطِلُۚ إِنَّ ٱلْبَٰطِلَ كَانَ زَهُوقًا
And say, "Truth has come, and falsehood has departed. Indeed is falsehood, [by nature], ever bound to depart."
To those who have doubt about hadith. One question, yes or no answer.
If the prophet Muhammad pbuh was alive today and amongst us and he came and said pray this many rakats in fajr prayer, would you accept it or reject it?
Yes or no?
How nonsensical shit was that FR, of course, you would accept it but how do you know he did what is reported through chains of narrations. Sometimes those chains are many people long so upwards of 3-8 people have narrated the prophet did this thing over 1400 years ago, only 200 years after the death it was complied into hadiths.
@@munib1000 so you reject all the hadith?
@@AhmedHassan-vo5fz Let's just say I'm very sceptical cause we can't confirm what the prophet said or did cause he's not on this plane.
@@munib1000 this is called doubt. I will end with this. May Allah Guide us.
@@AhmedHassan-vo5fz So the prophet came to you and said I wrote those or approved those to be written about me? That's called delusion. May Allah guide you!
Salaamun 3alaykum,
How does one respond to 45:6? (“These are the ayats of Allah We recite to you in truth. in which hadith after Allah and His Ayats would they believe?”)
Nice video, jazakum Allah khair. As for the 4+ Sunnah-rejectors who disliked this video- don’t hit a virtual button and then run away. Come and let us discuss. Provide your evidence & proof if you are truthful.
Read my post, I refuted his arguments.
AlQuran
is an explanation of all things/12:111,
And a clarification for all things/16:89.
And it's clear & fully detailed/12:1, 6:114.
So Prophet doesn't need to add anything,
He can simply recite and that's the clarity,
& that's what he would do to clarify Quran
Which is revealed to the people as Zhikr,
By simply reciting it as taught in 98:1-3.
As the sole duty of the Prophet
Is to deliver the Message/5:99.
(Cuz if Prophet didn't recite AlQuran,
AlQuran may have remained hidden,
So he has to recite for it to be clear.)
& the previous 16:43 verse before 16:44
Shows that we can even ask AhluzhZhikr
So the clarity isn't only for the Prophet a.s.
But AhlulKitaab didn't clarify the Book,
While they were charged to clarify that
But they hid it and made up fake Bibles
/3:187, 6:156, 2:79.
People who ignore the context
Are the ones trying to twist that.
There are all examples in AlQuran/18:54,
This itself makes other sources needless.
And there's nothing like Quran,
While they lie as if their Hadiths
Are like it, they're denying Quran,
Thus they're the Quran Rejectors.
AlQuran (Surah Al-Isra') 17:88-89
قُل لَّئِنِ ٱجْتَمَعَتِ ٱلْإِنسُ وَٱلْجِنُّ عَلَىٰٓ أَن يَأْتُوا۟ بِمِثْلِ هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ لَا يَأْتُونَ بِمِثْلِهِۦ وَلَوْ كَانَ بَعْضُهُمْ لِبَعْضٍ ظَهِيرًا
وَلَقَدْ صَرَّفْنَا لِلنَّاسِ فِى هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ مِن كُلِّ مَثَلٍ فَأَبَىٰٓ أَكْثَرُ ٱلنَّاسِ إِلَّا كُفُورًا
Say, "If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants."
And We have certainly diversified for the people in this Quran from every [kind of] example, but most of the people refused except disbelief.
Big jzk to bruva hijab for this, a very good breakdown, need more of this kind of content out there
Usman Saddique “brother”
Lol these people are so confused . The Quran was brought to worship Allah alone . These Sunnis are worshipping Muhammad and there scholars . Follow the Deen of Ibrahim . No hadiths . The Quran is the explanation . In 16:44 It is not saying that Muhammad’s duty is to give further explanation . Allah is telling Muhammad to make things clear . And what is more clear than the Quran . Stop inventing lies on Allah !
Suleyiman Ibn Ramos lol I wish I would have read this comment when you wrote it . After I’m done eating my dinner . I’ll deal with what you wrote .
Al-Baqarah 2:79
فَوَيْلٌ لِّلَّذِينَ يَكْتُبُونَ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ بِأَيْدِيهِمْ ثُمَّ يَقُولُونَ هَٰذَا مِنْ عِندِ ٱللَّهِ لِيَشْتَرُوا۟ بِهِۦ ثَمَنًا قَلِيلًاۖ فَوَيْلٌ لَّهُم مِّمَّا كَتَبَتْ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَوَيْلٌ لَّهُم مِّمَّا يَكْسِبُونَ
So woe[[ i.e., warning of a curse or punishment.]] to those who distort the Scripture with their own hands then say, “This is from Allah”-seeking a fleeting gain! So woe to them for what their hands have written, and woe to them for what they have earned.
جزاك الله خير!!!!🦁
AlQuran
is an explanation of all things/12:111,
And a clarification for all things/16:89.
And it's clear & fully detailed/12:1, 6:114.
So Prophet doesn't need to add anything,
He can simply recite and that's the clarity,
& that's what he would do to clarify Quran
Which is revealed to the people as Zhikr,
By simply reciting it as taught in 98:1-3.
As the sole duty of the Prophet
Is to deliver the Message/5:99.
(Cuz if Prophet didn't recite AlQuran,
AlQuran may have remained hidden,
So he has to recite for it to be clear.)
& the previous 16:43 verse before 16:44
Shows that we can even ask AhluzhZhikr
So the clarity isn't only for the Prophet a.s.
But AhlulKitaab didn't clarify the Book,
While they were charged to clarify that
But they hid it and made up fake Bibles
/3:187, 6:156, 2:79.
People who ignore the context
Are the ones trying to twist that.
There are all examples in AlQuran/18:54,
This itself makes other sources needless.
And there's nothing like Quran,
While they lie as if their Hadiths
Are like it, they're denying Quran,
Thus they're the Quran Rejectors.
AlQuran (Surah Al-Isra') 17:88-89
قُل لَّئِنِ ٱجْتَمَعَتِ ٱلْإِنسُ وَٱلْجِنُّ عَلَىٰٓ أَن يَأْتُوا۟ بِمِثْلِ هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ لَا يَأْتُونَ بِمِثْلِهِۦ وَلَوْ كَانَ بَعْضُهُمْ لِبَعْضٍ ظَهِيرًا
وَلَقَدْ صَرَّفْنَا لِلنَّاسِ فِى هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ مِن كُلِّ مَثَلٍ فَأَبَىٰٓ أَكْثَرُ ٱلنَّاسِ إِلَّا كُفُورًا
Say, "If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants."
And We have certainly diversified for the people in this Quran from every [kind of] example, but most of the people refused except disbelief.
hadith came 200 years after the prophet left this world. Like it or not, hear say does leave some room for human error to be made. Allah protects the Qur'an, not hadith. Not all Quranist reject hadith, neither accept either but prefer to keep to the centrality of the message being passed. Islam means submission to Allah, not submission to hadith
yummiyahyaa first are you Muslim?
Second if you are, how did the Quran reach in 2018?
Third 200 years later the Hadith were compiled!? That means put together in a book.
But when were the Hadith collected? And from who?
Please do research before denying that which no scholar of Islam has EVER denied.
yummiyahyaa ok? You answered none of my questions? You should ponder why you didn’t.
I will try again
How did the Quran reach you today?
Who transmitted it?
Also hope you went and done further research realising what the difference between compilation and transmission is? As a Muslim you don’t want to spread incorrect information that the Hadith were compiled 200 years later as if that’s when the Hadith came into existence!? Because you would not only be misleading yourself but many others as this is incorrect.
Also you stated in your previous comment that I think you edited now that “ the prophets job was to deliver the message and nothing more” do stand by that statement?
@@rakinight5376 The Quran was written and compiled during our prophet, and was preseved that way, i think that will answer your one million dollar question,
Now let me ask you question
Where is the Book that was written during our prophet that according to you is more important than the Quran?
Because it explains the Quran, according to you the Quran is nothing without it, according to you there's no Islam without it?
Now ponder upon this, if really hadith was that important wouldn't the Sahaba said guys, we are compiling this Book (Quran ) which won't work without hadith why shouldn't we compile another book and tell the Muslims these two books goes hand in hand.
@@affarokurz1486
وَعَلَى الثَّلَاثَةِ الَّذِينَ خُلِّفُوا حَتَّىٰ إِذَا ضَاقَتْ عَلَيْهِمُ الْأَرْضُ بِمَا رَحُبَتْ وَضَاقَتْ عَلَيْهِمْ أَنفُسُهُمْ وَظَنُّوا أَن لَّا مَلْجَأَ مِنَ اللَّهِ إِلَّا إِلَيْهِ ثُمَّ تَابَ عَلَيْهِمْ لِيَتُوبُوا ۚ إِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ التَّوَّابُ الرَّحِيمُ - 9:118
And [He also forgave] the three who were left behind [and regretted their error] to the point that the earth closed in on them in spite of its vastness and their souls confined them and they were certain that there is no refuge from Allah except in Him. Then He turned to them so they could repent. Indeed, Allah is the Accepting of repentance, the Merciful.
Can you explain to me who the three in this verse ALLAH talking to without using the hadith?
There is more but I simply put a single ayah to know from you how you understand the Quran?
@@basitkhan25 look, there's reason why Allah didn't tell who they were, because you don't need to know them, lets see the hadith explained who they're what different did it made to your life,
As a Shia brother in Islam i agree with my Sunni brothers that the Authentic hadith that doesn't contradict the Holy Quran is essential in Islam but i feel like they forgot to mention an even clearer verse that tells us to follow the sayings and the conduct of our Holy Prophet.
Verse(33-21) The Messenger of God is certainly a good example for those of you who have hope in God and in the Day of Judgment and who remember God very often
The Twelver Shia are open enemies of Allah and his messenger sallallahu alayhi wa salaam
@@geeenzee1152 stop with the anger bro.. i love you to
@@truthseekers9244 do you love Abu Bakr, Umar and Aisha r.a.
@@geeenzee1152 i am shia muslim and have been my whole life and have never once heard anyone in any mosque curse them in Canada or in my home Country Lebanon..now do i disassociate myself from there actions that they did after the Holy Prophet’s death?!Yes. Bro dont you see the trap of the real ennemies of Islam i.e the Zionist American and British governments!! They want to divide and conquer us! We should stand strong and hold on to the Rope of Allah all together like the Holy Quran says.. while we Shias and Sunnis are divided wether we fold or unfold our arms while we make salat, our ennemies are planning on how to cut our arms off altogether! You think they care who is sunni or shia! Our main concern should be Palestine! We need to wake up my dear brother in Islam. salams to you and your family
@@truthseekers9244 I'm from Iran and we have an official Lanat bar Umar day, so don't tell about what you have and haven't seen or witnessed. It is a well known, recorded, and undeniable fact that the Twelver Shia curse the companions. You can say that YOU don't do it, but don't lie about Tashayyu and it's practices. Of course you might be simply ignorant of Tashayyu. Which one is it?
And just for good measure, our differences are not matters of fiqh, i. e. where to put our hands in Salat. We have aqeedah differences. Let's put all issues to the side, the lanat, the tahreef of the Quran, the Taqia, the Mutah, the tawassul, the self mutilation, let's even put the cursing of the companions aside... But what about Imaamah. Prove Imaamah from the Quran.
I truly disagree with the points mentioned here in regards to the validity of the Hadith corpus, via the Qur'an. Essentially, they're arguing that the Qur'an isn't sufficient in detail and an explanation/exposition of all things. Very saddening indeed.
Well that's because it's true. Qur'an tells you to do Farz, Salah. But how you're supposed to do it, is not in Qur'an. It's in Hadith, as Mohammed was the person who explained how to do it.
Mustafa Khan, brother u didn't get the point, The Quran is complete, while the Hadith Explains the Quran.
What about it?
Oh yeah, I agree. However they anger me and it's kinda true. But yeah, I apologize for bad language. I didn't even realize what I wrote. They are ... like that though .
Kadiro Manai no my beloved brother. The Qur'an says that Allah explains the Qur'an and not the Hadith corpus (which came around 2 centuries after the Prophet's death).
The phrase - wa-aṭīʿūni/وَأَطِيعُونِ is extensively used in Chapter (26) sūrat l-shuʿarā (The Poets) 108,110-150.
... إِنَّ ٱلْأَمْرَ كُلَّهُۥ لِلَّهِۗ .../3:154
لَيْسَ لَكَ مِنَ ٱلْأَمْرِ شَىْءٌ .../3:128
AlQuran (Surah Yusuf) 12:111
لَقَدْ كَانَ فِى قَصَصِهِمْ عِبْرَةٌ لِّأُو۟لِى ٱلْأَلْبَٰبِۗ مَا كَانَ حَدِيثًا يُفْتَرَىٰ وَلَٰكِن تَصْدِيقَ ٱلَّذِى بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ وَتَفْصِيلَ كُلِّ شَىْءٍ وَهُدًى وَرَحْمَةً لِّقَوْمٍ يُؤْمِنُونَ
There was certainly in their stories a lesson for those of understanding. Never was it [i.e., the Quran] a narration invented, but a confirmation of what was before it and a detailed explanation of all things and guidance and mercy for a people who believe.
So you mean The Holy Quran cannot be understood without the Hadith?! The Quran is meant for the Scholars not for the common people?! Did Prophet Muhammad peace be upon ask the companions to record his sayings and his actions? Did he send the Quran with his sayings along for dawah?
I cannot believe the Quran alone is not enough for these people. Allah said in Quran 54:17: "And We have indeed made the Qur'an easy to understand and remember: then is there any that will receive admonition?"
Wow. Just WOW.
They usually say "if it's not in the Quran, it must be in the hadiths" which by the way is according to a guy who NEVER met the prophet.
So, these people aren't following the Quran, they are following the religion of Mr. Bukhari.
Sadaf Imran u just pick n choose Allah says in the Quran there is verses easy to understand and there is verse not explain fully and ask your scholars
Sami bigs oh u mean the ambiguous verses or the unambiguous verse because unambiguous is crystal clear
@@sadafimran6146 it doesn't mean
"Understand" but means "remember",
& if we fear Allah, He gives us Criterion,
So we don't need mullas for Quran at all,
Allah is sufficient for us.
Chapter 16:44 says that Allah says that he sent the message to the prophet to explain what was sent to the people. Yet when you read the verse before it, it mentions that previous messengers were sent to the people. As such, verse 16:44 is stating that the prophet was revealed the Qur'an (message or remembrance) to explain previous revelations from previous messengers. Not that the prophet is given a message or external information to explain the Qur'an. So nothing in the verse says to follow hadith or hadith is necessary or needed to explain the Qur'an. Period. Adnan's position is not valid.
How can you know how to pray?
The only way to know that is through Hadith (the sayings of prophet Muhammad PBUH).
This is a serious matter. If you don't accept the Hadith of prophet Muhammad PBUH; you might be considered as a Kafir may Allah forbid it, so please follow what Allah and his messenger Muhammad PBUH has said.
*{وَأَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَالرَّسُولَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُرْحَمُونَ}*
*And obey Allah and the Messenger that you may obtain mercy.* Quran [2:132]
Also in [64:12], [58:13], [8:46], and [5,92].
Also in 16:44, yes it does mean the Quran but it says "And We revealed to you the message that you may make clear to the people what was sent down to them and that they might give thought.", so Allah has sent the Quran to Muhammed PBUH to teach the poeple what it means, and the only way to know what those teachings are is through the Hadith, that's why Allah has preserved it so we can know not what could've been meant but what was really meant, otherwise you'll see people left and right interpreting the Quran as they please, and we will become like the christians.
pqpq the verse clearly says what was revealed to "them". That is clear . So the verse was clearly mentioning both scripture before and after. Never all at once.
@@abdul-haiymuhammad8373
Al-Tabari, Al-Qurtubi, and Ibn kathir all agree that "And We revealed to you the message" or "الذكر" means the Qur'an that was sent to Muhammad PBUH.
Why wouldn't you accept Hadith?
Are you rejecting Muhammad's words or are you rejecting the ones who brought his words? and if so then why?
@@abdul-haiymuhammad8373
You have done something horribly wrong, and if you don't repent; Allah will punish you and send you to Hell Fire.
You can't reject any saying of the Prophet if that saying was proven to be from him, unless you have a tangible proof that it's wrong.
So all Hadiths are right untill proven to be not, and if you think that it contradicts the Qur'an or it's too violent you still can't reject it, and if you did you'd be far away from the teachings of islam.
Please brother be carefule of what you say.
عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ سَمِعَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَقُولُ : " إِنَّ الْعَبْدَ لَيَتَكَلَّمُ بِالْكَلِمَةِ مَا يَتَبَيَّنُ فِيهَا يَزِلُّ بِهَا فِي النَّارِ أَبْعَدَ مِمَّا بَيْنَ الْمَشْرِقِ ".
البخاري-6477
Narrated Abu Huraira: That he heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "A slave of Allah may utter a word without thinking whether it is right or wrong, he may slip down in the Fire as far away a distance equal to that between the east."
Sahih al-Bukhari-6477.
You can’t have the Quran without Hadith and you can’t have the Hadith without the Quran they go hand in hand! Quran= the word of Allah swt, Hadith= the saying, doing, actions of the Prophet peace be upon him!
Watch this and learn something
ruclips.net/video/DFsdwYBZqY0/видео.html
6:50mins to Muhammed Hijab.. obviously the people who fabricated hadiths will write such a thing so people stay on their Zoroastrian propaganda
Quran 18:54 "Indeed we have explained in this Qur'an every subject in various ways for the benefit of the people, but out of all the creation, man is most disputing"
25:30 "And the Messenger will say, " O' my Lord, my people had taken this Quran as deserted."
16:44) "We raised the Messengers earlier with Clear Signs and Divine Books, and We have now sent down this Reminder upon you that you may elucidate to people the teaching that has been sent down for them ,and that the people may themselves reflect."
In this connection, it is worthwhile to note that this duty of making plain and explaining the teachings of the Book was to be performed by Prophet not only by word of mouth but also practically. It was required that he should organize, under his own guidance, a Muslim community and establish it in accordance with the principles of the Book. This duty of the Prophet (peace be upon him) has been stated here especially to show the wisdom of sending a man as a Messenger, for, otherwise the Book could have been sent through the angels or could have been printed and sent directly to each man. But in this way; that purpose for which Allah in His Wisdom and Bounty and Providence designed to send the Book could not have been served. For, that purpose demanded that the Book should be brought by a perfect man, who should present it piece by piece, explain its meaning, remove the difficulties and doubts, answer objections etc. and above all, he should show towards those who rejected and opposed it that kind of attitude which is worthy of the bearer of this Book. On the other hand, he should guide those who believed in it in every aspect of life and set before them his own excellent pattern of life. Then he should train them individually and collectively on the principles of the Book; so as to make them a model society for the rest of mankind.
Let us now consider this (verse 43) from another point of view. Just as it cuts at the root of the argumentation of those who rejected the creed that a human Prophet could bring the Book, in the same way, it repudiates the view of those who plead that the Book should be accepted without any exposition of it from the Prophet. This latter view is contradictory to this verse, whatever be the position taken by its exponents. They might either be of the opinion that (a) the Prophet did not give any explanation of the Book he presented or that (b) the only acceptable thing is the Book and not any exposition thereof by the Prophet, or that (c) now the Book alone suffices us, for its exposition by the Prophet has lost its utility or that (d) now the Book alone is authentic for the exposition by the Prophet has ceased to exist, or if it does exists, it cannot be relied upon.
If they take the position (a), it will mean that the Prophet did not fulfill the purpose for which he was chosen to be the bearer of the Book: otherwise Allah could send it through an angel or directly to each person.
If they take the position (b) or (c), (God forbid) they will be accusing Allah of doing a useless thing by sending His Book through a Prophet, when He could have printed copies of the Quran and sent those directly to the people.
In case, they take the position (d), they, in fact, repudiate both the Quran and its exposition by the Prophet (peace be upon him). Then the only rational course left for them would be to accept the view of those who believe in the necessity of a new Prophet and a new revelation; whereas Allah Himself considers the exposition of the Book by the Prophet as an essential thing, and puts it forward as an argument for the necessity of a Prophet. Now if the view of those who reject tradition that the explanation of the Prophet (peace be upon him) has disappeared from the world is to be accepted, then two conclusions are inevitable; First, the Prophethood of Muhammad (peace be upon him) as a pattern for us has ceased to exist, and the only relation we have with him is the same that we have with the other former Prophets, e.g. Houd, Salih, Shuaib, etc. (peace be upon them). That is, we have only to testify that they were Prophets but we have no obligation to follow their patterns, for we have none with us. This position obviously leads to the need of a new Prophet, for it automatically refutes the doctrine of the finality of Prophethood. The second inevitable conclusion will be that a new Book is needed because in that case the Quran alone could not, according to its author, suffice. Thus in the face of this verse, there is no argument left to prove that the Quran is self sufficient to explain itself, for it itself says that there is no need of a Prophet to explain it. Thus it is absolutely necessary that a new Book must be sent down. In their enthusiasm to repudiate tradition, they are really cutting at the very root of Islam itself.
Thank you Hijab May Allah guide u guys always
AlQuran
is an explanation of all things/12:111,
And a clarification for all things/16:89.
And it's clear & fully detailed/12:1, 6:114.
So Prophet doesn't need to add anything,
He can simply recite and that's the clarity,
& that's what he would do to clarify Quran
Which is revealed to the people as Zhikr,
By simply reciting it as taught in 98:1-3.
As the sole duty of the Prophet
Is to deliver the Message/5:99.
(Cuz if Prophet didn't recite AlQuran,
AlQuran may have remained hidden,
So he has to recite for it to be clear.)
& the previous 16:43 verse before 16:44
Shows that we can even ask AhluzhZhikr
So the clarity isn't only for the Prophet a.s.
But AhlulKitaab didn't clarify the Book,
While they were charged to clarify that
But they hid it and made up fake Bibles
/3:187, 6:156, 2:79.
People who ignore the context
Are the ones trying to twist that.
There are all examples in AlQuran/18:54,
This itself makes other sources needless.
And there's nothing like Quran,
While they lie as if their Hadiths
Are like it, they're denying Quran,
Thus they're the Quran Rejectors.
AlQuran (Surah Al-Isra') 17:88-89
قُل لَّئِنِ ٱجْتَمَعَتِ ٱلْإِنسُ وَٱلْجِنُّ عَلَىٰٓ أَن يَأْتُوا۟ بِمِثْلِ هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ لَا يَأْتُونَ بِمِثْلِهِۦ وَلَوْ كَانَ بَعْضُهُمْ لِبَعْضٍ ظَهِيرًا
وَلَقَدْ صَرَّفْنَا لِلنَّاسِ فِى هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ مِن كُلِّ مَثَلٍ فَأَبَىٰٓ أَكْثَرُ ٱلنَّاسِ إِلَّا كُفُورًا
Say, "If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants."
And We have certainly diversified for the people in this Quran from every [kind of] example, but most of the people refused except disbelief.
I just don’t understand why all these smart people do not come up with the SIMPLE analogy: the one about our legislation and laws in the society. You see, we have books of law, rights, obligations and penals etc. However, if it was sufficient at itself for PRACTICE, we would not require Judges, courts and JURISPRUDENCE. You see, the fact that laws apply equally to EVERYONE at the same time, make that - not that unclarity comes from the laws - but that new, special circumstances arise that raise questions about HOW the laws should be applies (justly). That is now the case in Western civilizations, actually has been in all. It is pure logic. So it is NOT hard to understand that even though the Quranic message is divine and perfect, the APPLICABILITY of the “laws” aspect of the Quran even though they are clear at itself, may always lead to situations in real life where the involved HUMANs need clarity on HOW to apply (and an actual “ruler”). Not because the message is not perfect, but because humans are limited (if they were not they would possess the “all Knowing” attribute of Allah equal to Allah, which is a false claim and blasphemy. Please use this analogy in the future for all those discussions about why it is only logical that the Hadith and Sunna exists.
you should know that not every single thing the prophet said was of god, it was sometimes himself, he still spoke as a human
frblaze2 read beginning aayats of Surah Al Najm and verses 44-46 from Surah Al Haqqah
this is a big misconception... it just doesn't make sense... if every single word he said was revelation that would mean, when he tells someone to come eat, or shut the door, or please let me enter, its revelation? no, aren't there even stories where he was questioned and even persuaded to rethink his decisions when it came to matters of the state? this proves he doesn't KNOW everything through revelation
No it's not.. if you understand arabic then listen to this
ruclips.net/video/nY_5fO3umkU/видео.html
I don't understand arabic
that is a huge discussion amongst scholars themselves BUT..it is irrelevant to this video because the issue isn't if the prophet (PBUH) spoke as a human or not.. it is about the WIEGHT of his words..so even if he spoke as a human his speech is still authoritative because Allah made it so clearly in the Quran.. that is why scholars will not just look at the content of an authentic hadith but they will also look at the style of its wording AND the context of its utterance to derive rulings,if possible, from it.. that is why you could find scholars commenting sometimes that a specific hadith was ONLY for that specific occasion/person and not to be generalized.. and so on..
The word hadith means narration, and the only narration that God insists on is the Qur'an! Read 26:109-126 each messenger asked his people to follow him. There are time bound verses, to say there isn't, is foolish. We cannot marry the Prophet of God, we cannot raise our voices to him, or go for a meal. So yes the Qur'an has past, present and future messages and narrations.
What Allah says about the Quran in the Quran
• There is no doubt in this Book (2:2).
• Allah has taken the responsibility to explain it (75:19).
• Allah says He has revealed the Quran and He will protect it (15:9).
• Allah’s revelation to the Prophet (PBUH) is written in the Quran (6:19). There is no verse in the Quran which says that Allah’s revelation to the Prophet (PBUH) is outside the Quran.
• Momineen are asked to obey the revelation from Allah (7:3).
• The Prophet (PBUH) was asked to obey the revelation sent down on him (10:109).
• The Prophet (PBUH) was asked to follow the Quran (75:18).
• Allah required the Prophet (PBUH) to follow the blessed Book sent down on him (6:155).
• The Prophet (PBUH) used to judge matters according to the revelation sent down on him (5:48).
• Those who do not judge matters according to what Allah has revealed are Kaafirs (5:44).
• In the Quran, Allah has completed His message and no one can change anything in it (6:34, 6:115).
• The Quran encompasses the message of earlier revelations (5:48). So, the truth of earlier revelations is now contained in the Quran.
• In it there are no contradictions (4:82).
• Allah has called the Quran “Tibyaanan li Kulli Shaiyin (16:89)”. This means it explains everything.
• Allah gives many verses on a particular topic over and over again (6:105, 17:41). This means that we have to collect all the verses on a topic in order to understand it fully. This is the Divine method of understanding the Quran.
• The Prophet (PBUH) was required to solve all human differences through the Quran (16:64).
• The Prophet (PBUH) was required to admonish and remind people through the Quran (50:45).
• The Quran itself is light (5:15). So, it is not dependent on another source of light.
• This light (i.e., the Quran) has been given so that human beings, using this light, can travel safely on the path of life (6:122).
You cannot prove your point with hadiths:
Miqdam ibn Ma’di reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, I have been given the Quran and something along with it, but the time is coming when a man will recline on his couch and say: Keep to the Quran, for whatever you find in it lawful is lawful and whatever you find in it unlawful is unlawful. Certainly, it is not lawful for you to eat a domesticated donkey, beasts with fangs, or the lost item of a citizen unless he no longer wants it. If people are visited by guests then they must be entertained, but if they do not do so then the guests have a right to take what is due from them.”
Source: Sunan Abu Dawud 4604
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
The above narration contradicts the verses of God!
Simone Jamilla Allah says take whatever the messenger gives and stay away from whatever he forbids. Where is this extra quranic material found? How do quranists pray? Who are the companions? What are the names of the wives of the prophet(pbuh)? Quranists have no historical basis at all. Hadith explains the ahruf and qirat. Think sana manuscript and hafs and warsh. Quran says it’s written on pure pages by noble and virtuous scribes, who are those scribes?. Answer these.
Simone Jamilla I also find these quranists only come on recent time while Muslims have followed Quran and Hadith since the time of the prophet(pbuh).
Kevin Savas bro. You do realize that hadith in the Quran isn’t referring to the hadith. Ok I got a challenge for you. Name me one classical scholar that supports your view. Don’t try to tell me that you know 7th century Arabic than 7th century Arabs. You do realize we only Accept hadith that are sahih are in agreement with Quran. The same people who gave us the Quran also gave us the Hadith so I am failing to understand the problem here.
Kevin Savas what is the names of the companions? What are the names of the wives of the prophet(saws)?
AlQuran
is an explanation of all things/12:111,
And a clarification for all things/16:89.
And it's clear & fully detailed/12:1, 6:114.
So Prophet doesn't need to add anything,
He can simply recite and that's the clarity,
& that's what he would do to clarify Quran
Which is revealed to the people as Zhikr,
By simply reciting it as taught in 98:1-3.
As the sole duty of the Prophet
Is to deliver the Message/5:99.
(Cuz if Prophet didn't recite AlQuran,
AlQuran may have remained hidden,
So he has to recite for it to be clear.)
& the previous 16:43 verse before 16:44
Shows that we can even ask AhluzhZhikr
So the clarity isn't only for the Prophet a.s.
But AhlulKitaab didn't clarify the Book,
While they were charged to clarify that
But they hid it and made up fake Bibles
/3:187, 6:156, 2:79.
People who ignore the context
Are the ones trying to twist that.
There are all examples in AlQuran/18:54,
This itself makes other sources needless.
And there's nothing like Quran,
While they lie as if their Hadiths
Are like it, they're denying Quran,
Thus they're the Quran Rejectors.
AlQuran (Surah Al-Isra') 17:88-89
قُل لَّئِنِ ٱجْتَمَعَتِ ٱلْإِنسُ وَٱلْجِنُّ عَلَىٰٓ أَن يَأْتُوا۟ بِمِثْلِ هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ لَا يَأْتُونَ بِمِثْلِهِۦ وَلَوْ كَانَ بَعْضُهُمْ لِبَعْضٍ ظَهِيرًا
وَلَقَدْ صَرَّفْنَا لِلنَّاسِ فِى هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ مِن كُلِّ مَثَلٍ فَأَبَىٰٓ أَكْثَرُ ٱلنَّاسِ إِلَّا كُفُورًا
Say, "If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants."
And We have certainly diversified for the people in this Quran from every [kind of] example, but most of the people refused except disbelief.
*HIS ARGUMENTS ARE SO WEAK!*
No need to twist anything to prove them wrong.
1. The Explanation of the Qur'an is *in the Qur'an,* because God Himself tells us that His Book is *complete* and *fully detailed.*
The prophet used to explain the Qur'an by using the Qur'an.
_"Shall I seek other than God as a judge when _*_He has sent down to you the Book fully detailed?"_*_ Those to whom We have given the Book know it is sent down from your Lord with the truth; so _*_do not be of those who have doubt._*_ And _*_the word of your Lord is completed with truth and justice;_*_ there is no changing His words. He is the Hearer, the Knower. And _*_if you obey most of those on the earth they will lead you away from the path of God;_*_ that is because _*_they follow conjecture,_*_ and that is because they only guess._
6:114-116
The ahadith is not an explanation, is a collection of books which were written in the 9th century.
_These are the revelations of God, We recite them to you with the truth. So, in which narrative after God and His revelations do they believe? Woe to every sinful fabricator. He hears the revelations of God being recited to him, then he persists arrogantly, as if he never heard them. Give him news of a painful retribution._
45:6-8
2. The correct meaning of "make clear" is "not to conceal", and it is clarified in the following verse:
_And God took the covenant of those who were given the Book: "You will _*_make it clear_*_ to the people and _*_not conceal it."_*_ But they placed it behind their backs and purchased with it a cheap price. Miserable indeed is what they have purchased._
3:187
3. *Yes, WE CAN EAT dogs, cats, lions, tigers, insects, sea food, clams if we wish! Read this verse and think for yourself:*
Say: *"I do not find in what is inspired to me to be forbidden for any eater to eat, except:* that it be already dead, or running blood, or the meat of pig-for it is foul-or what has become vile by being sacrificed to other than God." But whoever is forced to, without seeking disobedience or transgression, then your Lord is Forgiving, Merciful.
6:145
4. The Hadiths that he mentioned, it is obvious that they were going to be fabricated, otherwise how could they protect their hadith! Prophet Mohammed was already a Qur'aniyoon, because *Mohammed didn't invent anything other than what Allah revealed to him:*
_So I do swear by what you see._
_And what you do not see._
_This is the utterance of an honorable messenger._
_It is not the utterance of a poet; rarely do you believe._
_Nor the utterance of a soothsayer; rarely do you take heed._
_A revelation from the Lord of the worlds._
_And _*_had he attributed anything falsely to Us_*_ ._
_We would have seized him by the right._
_Then, _*_We would have severed his life-line_*_ ._
_None of you _*_would be able to prevent it_*_ ._
_And this is a reminder for the righteous._
_And We know that some of you are deniers._
_And that it is a distress for the rejecters._
_And it is the absolute truth._
_Therefore, you shall glorify the name of your Lord, the Great._
69:38-52
5. No hadith is as authentic as the Qur'an. We have ancient carbon-dated manuscripts of the Qur'an, instead the hadith all come from 9th-10th century. We don't even have the original Sahih Bukhari, *we only have the work of his students.*
6. Fiqh is man made doctrine. *The authentic jurisprudence ordered by Allah is in the Qur'an!!!*
*Whoever does not judge with what God has sent down, then these are the rejecters (kafiroon).*
_We have sent down the Torah, in it is a guidance and a light; the prophets who have submitted judged with it for those who are Jewish, and the Devotees, and the Priests, for what they were entrusted of the Book of God, and they were witness over. So do not be concerned with the people but be concerned with Me; and do not purchase with My revelations a cheap price. _*_And whoever does not judge with what God has sent down, then these are the rejecters._*_ And We have decreed for them in it that a life for a life, and an eye for an eye, and a nose for a nose, and an ear for an ear, and a tooth for a tooth, and the wounds to be impartial; and whoever remits anything of it, then it will cancel sins for him. _*_And whoever does not judge with what God has sent down, then these are the wicked._*_ And We sent in their footsteps Jesus, son of Mary, affirming what was between his hands of the Torah. And We gave him the Gospel, in it is a guidance and a light, and affirming what was between his hands of the Torah, and a guidance and a lesson for the righteous. And let the people of the Gospel judge with what God has sent down in it. _*_And whoever does not judge with what God has sent down, then these are the wicked._*_ _*_And We have sent down to you the Book_*_ with the truth, affirming what is between your hands of the Book and superseding it. _*_So judge between them by what God has sent down, and do not follow their desires_*_ from what has come to you of the truth. For each of you We have made laws, and a structure; and if God had willed, He would have made you all one nation, but He tests you with what He has given you; so race to do good. To God you will return all of you, and He will inform you regarding that in which you dispute. And _*_judge between them by what God has sent down,_*_ and do not follow their desires, and beware lest they divert you away from some of what God has sent down to you. If they turn away, then know that God wants to inflict them with some of their sins; and many of the people are wicked. _*_Is it the judgment of the days of ignorance that they seek? And who is better than God as a judge_*_ for a people who comprehend?_
5:44-50
7. With verse "today we perfected your religion" *he shoot in his foot!*
"Today" the hadith were still not invented! Allah is saying that He perfected their deen (system/religion) with the Final Revelation to Mankind = Qur'an.
8. *The rest of the argument is a STRAW MAN, used to distract people from the Quranic proof*
Which one bro?
Salaam bro, can you guide me to a website/information source where I can understand the basis of quran alone?
The quran is perfect but hadith explain them, without hadith you can have sex with 5years old and beat your wife what else?
your sect is just supported by liberal to make islam fall apart.
Allah told us to follow him and his prophet.
@@shahwan5626
That is correct. You know we are told in the Hadiths that on the day of judgement the Kausar would be given to the Prophet Mohammad (SAW) and the Prophet (pbuh) would instruct his Ummah to drink from the river and some of the Ummah of the Prophet Mohammad (SAW) would be stopped by the angels. And when the Prophet (pbuh) asks the angels why they have stopped the Ummah of the Prophet (pbuh) then the angels would reply it is because they have changed the Sunnah after you left. And we know those individuals would be sent to Hellfire. I strongly believe the people who rejects the authentic Hadiths are Kafirs and would be those people who would be stopped by the angels.
@@samanali4848
*You said:* everything is in that link qiblah Wuduh fasting what to say during prayers how to end it everything is based solely in Quran.
*Response:* Yes there are things mentioned in the Quran and we don't doubt it. But not everything is mentioned in the Quran or example could you tell me whether it is halal to eat Tigers and Lions and eagles? And I only want to know through Quran verses.
*You said* But you can't give evidence in hadith when we don't even believe it because it has many things that go against Quran.
*Response:* You see there are many verses which the Non-Muslims have shown that contradicts the Quran. Meaning Quranic verses contradicting with each other. Does that mean we should reject the Quran? The answer is no. That is because we have to examine the verses first and see what is the context. In the same way, there are Hadiths where the Prophet Mohammad (SAW) instructed the Sahabas not to shout Allahu Akbar loudly. Some people may say why did the Prophet do that? The answer is that the enemies of Islam were close and it would be dangerous to shout Allahu Akbar loudly and that's why the Prophet (pbuh) forbade to shout Allahu Akbar loudly at that time in that place. So context is very important. If a Hadiths contradict the Quran then we have to check the context. If the context is the same then we have to see if the Hadiths are authentic. No authentic Hadiths would ever contradict the Quran.
And also we don't believe the Prophet Mohammad (SAW) to be God. In many Surah of the Quran, we have the name of Mohammad (SAW) in the verse. So when we recite those verses it doesn't mean we are saying that the prophet is God.
This post is an example why prophet Mohammed will testify against his people on the day of judgment because they abandoned the Quran which is complete as per God himself in the Quran and pursued books such as Hadith-hearsay written by men.
Quran: "then in which Hadith
After Allah and His ayats
Will they believe?"/45:6.
Sunni/Shia: "Bukhari/Kafi
and this and that Hadith"
Quran: "these are the verses
Of the clear Book"/12:1.
Sunni/Shia: "no,
Quran isn't clear"
Quran: "We have certainly
Diversified in this Quran
From all examples"/18:54.
Sunni/Shia: "no,
Not all examples"
Quran: "He that is Who has
Revealed to you the Book
Explained in detail"/6:114
Sunni/Shia:
"Quran has no all the details,
No detail of the Prophet's life,
No detail of how to pray so on".
Quran: "O Prophet why do you
Prohibit which Allah made lawful
To please your wives?"/66:1
Sunni/Shia: "whatever Prophet
Said and did was all from wahi".
They are the obvious Quran Rejectors.
For 16:44
see 16:43, 3:187 & 12:1, 16:89, 5:99.
For 4:59
see 4:60, 3:128, 3:154, 12:39-40, 42:10.
For 4:65
see 4:60-65, 4:105, 6:114, (12:40).
For 59:7
see 42:36, 6:159, 5:99, 10:15, 41:6.
For 53:3-4
see 53:10, 42:52, 2:93 & 2:89, 6:19.
Context destroys their fake tafseers,
They're not scholars but clear scams,
their sects are clearly on uprooted lies.
Al-Isra' 17:81
وَقُلْ جَآءَ ٱلْحَقُّ وَزَهَقَ ٱلْبَٰطِلُۚ إِنَّ ٱلْبَٰطِلَ كَانَ زَهُوقًا
And say, "Truth has come, and falsehood has departed. Indeed is falsehood, [by nature], ever bound to depart."
There are over 50 collections of Ahadeeth (Shia + Sunni + others), how can a Muslim know which one to follow and which one to not. And these 2 gentlemen whose knowledge I admire and appreciate very much, want us to believe that the explanation of Allah's word lies in these texts (so it means that over the last 1400 years, we the human kind based on our own knowledge and dwarf wisdom have been quarreling to filter out the wrong ones and establish the Saheeh so called "Qur'an Explanatory reports"). Astaghfirullah!
This would mean Allah revealed his word which his Messenger ensured was recorded in his lifetime and Allah himself authenticates and vows to protect it, additionally he revealed the explanation/details to his "word" (despite Allah himself saying on several occasions that his word is self-explanatory) to the same Messenger who left it to the mercy of scholars who would come more than at least 150 years after his death to collect and present it to his Ummah as a guidance, this explanation that is NOT authenticated by ALLAH, HIS MESSENGER NOR HIS COMPANIONS. Really? Please think.
Sajid Shaikh Quran-[3:32]
It says in the Quran to OBEY Allah and The Messenger.
Why does the hadith need to be authenticated by Allah? The Hadith is the tradition/teachings/history of Muhammad pbuh of how he teaches the Quran to muslims. Without Muhammad pbuh teachings, then the Quran is OPEN to interpretation. Did the Quran came without a Messenger??? Do you know HOW problematic it is to have the Quran WITHOUT the Messenger Muhammad pbuh?
All the revelation was given to the Prophet, it was the Prophet’s JOB to teach them about the revelation. The hadith is basically a tradition, history, biography of Muhammad pbuh. It’s NOT divine in nature BUT a recored history of Muhammad pbuh’s traditions on HOW to PRACTICE ISLAM. Quran NEVER teaches HOW to pray, what AYAT to use in prayer etc. These traditions are called SUNNAH, it is crucial in practicing what Allah has instructed to Muhammad pbuh. Without the prophet the message can be interpreted in MANY ways. Which is dangerous follow Muhammad pbuh traditions on how to implement the teachings of the Quran and that way no one will be lost. Follow the Quran and the Sunnah.
@@KryptonKr 2 basic wrong assumptions Muhammad was not given the job of teaching the Qur'an as per Qur'an pls read. And 2 that the record of his life is a part of your Deen.
Sajid Shaikh How do we know WHO Muhammad pbuh was if no one recorded his biography, history, traditions and teachings?
I’m NOT saying that his life was part of the Deen. What he did and what he teaches is part of it. Especially during those 23 years he was as a Prophet. How do I know it was 23 years? It was recorded. We humans tend to record things whether we like it or not. We need to established that Muhammad pbuh was a REAL person. People can outright deny his existence when there is no record of him being existed in the first place.
I’m not saying Hadith is the PRIMARY authority. No, that’s not what I mean, the Quran will always be the MAIN AND PRIMARY authority but the Quran didn’t fell out of the Sky did it?
If what you’re saying is true that the Quran doesn’t need anything to interpret the meanings of the words. Then why was there a Messenger? Why have a messenger in the first place? He’s not there to teach Islam? To make them understand what Islam is all about. You do know that the Quran was a revelation, it was not a book. We have Quran as books why? It’s the same thing with Muhammad pbuh teachings and traditions, it wasn’t recorded but it HAPPENED. It all depends on the narration and the science of it. A lot of scholars are taking it seriously. We don’t follow hadith now just for fun.
Sajid Shaikh Let me ask another question. WHO did the companions follow to learn about the Quran? Muhammad pbuh or they read them by themselves and interpret it themselves?
Their traditions was from Muhammad pbuh, He taught the companions how to pray etc. The Quran did not describe Muhammad pbuh’s way of implementing the Quran. The Messenger was a living walking Quran. The Quran we have now if you read it just like that, it’s like the Quran didn’t have a Messenger. What you’re reading is like it came from the sky and everyone can make THEIR own interpretation.
Sajid Shaikh If you read the Quran, it LITERALLY said to follow and obey the Messenger. His teachings etc. If you only follow the Quran you’re REJECTING Muhammad pbuh himself. Which is a contradiction in the Quran.
This prediction of Muhammad pbuh saying that he got the Quran & something similar like it where is that mentioned in the Quran. 25:30 is what Muhammad pbuh will say about his people.
Allah challenged disbelievers (i.e. them) to bring a HADITH like Quran in 52:34, so they think they brought something like Quran (i.e. their Ahadith), while their Ahadith has no proof, it hangs merely on pick and choose of people which they assume to be trustworthy (/9:101, with no 4 witnesses given/24:11-13, 24:17-18), while they contradict Quran, logic, science and more.
Al-Isra' 17:88
قُل لَّئِنِ ٱجْتَمَعَتِ ٱلْإِنسُ وَٱلْجِنُّ عَلَىٰٓ أَن يَأْتُوا۟ بِمِثْلِ هَٰذَا ٱلْقُرْءَانِ لَا يَأْتُونَ بِمِثْلِهِۦ وَلَوْ كَانَ بَعْضُهُمْ لِبَعْضٍ ظَهِيرًا
Say, "If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants."
I love you my Muslim brother adana
You juse more hadith then quran ?
no
the verse adnan alrashid qouted in the begining doesnt nessecerly mean hadith kit could be refering to tafseer alquran by the quran by the way even hadith doesnt equal the quran even sahihs hyes we believe in hadiths sashih ones wich doesnt contradict the quran yes hadith is pointed by the quran and he doesnt speak on his own desires its only an inspiration inspired
yes in hadith there's tasfeer of the quran , and moutawatir hadith equals quran meaning as authority .
I just realised Bro Hijab looks like Brother Adnan was stretched upwards!
Quran: "then in which Hadith
After Allah and His ayats
Will they believe?"/45:6.
Sunni/Shia: "Bukhari/Kafi
and this and that Hadith"
Quran: "these are the verses
Of the clear Book"/12:1.
Sunni/Shia: "no,
Quran isn't clear"
Quran: "We have certainly
Diversified in this Quran
From all examples"/18:54.
Sunni/Shia: "no,
Not all examples"
Quran: "He that is Who has
Revealed to you the Book
Explained in detail"/6:114
Sunni/Shia:
"Quran has no all the details,
No detail of the Prophet's life,
No detail of how to pray so on".
Quran: "O Prophet why do you
Prohibit which Allah made lawful
To please your wives?"/66:1
Sunni/Shia: "whatever Prophet
Said and did was all from wahi".
They are the obvious Quran Rejectors.
For 16:44
see 16:43, 3:187 & 12:1, 16:89, 5:99.
For 4:59
see 4:60, 3:128, 3:154, 12:39-40, 42:10.
For 4:65
see 4:60-65, 4:105, 6:114, (12:40).
For 59:7
see 42:36, 6:159, 5:99, 10:15, 41:6.
For 53:3-4
see 53:10, 42:52, 2:93 & 2:89, 6:19.
Context destroys their fake tafseers,
They're not scholars but clear scams,
their sects are clearly on uprooted lies.
Al-Isra' 17:81
وَقُلْ جَآءَ ٱلْحَقُّ وَزَهَقَ ٱلْبَٰطِلُۚ إِنَّ ٱلْبَٰطِلَ كَانَ زَهُوقًا
And say, "Truth has come, and falsehood has departed. Indeed is falsehood, [by nature], ever bound to depart."
Who won ? Adnan racheed or Muhammad hijab ?
is it just me or the guy wearing the yellow hoodie looks like he is in another world he is too focused in something else lol
I can't believe these two brothers debate with the Christian, and defend the hadith which are same as the bible man made scripture,
do u compare the hadith with the bible !
Even the Qur’an the word of God transmitted by humans And the talk is the word of God through the Messenger who was transmitted by humans
@@nameless4477it's very good that you understand all religion scriptures came to us thru Men, now use the only assets Allah gave you, you know the one that you will be held accountable in the hereafter, your brain
And find out which scripture are worthy coming from Allah, and wichone is bullshit
After carefully investigation, without making any excuse or acrobatics, my conclusion is the Quran is the only book thats worthy comming from Allah, as for hadith and the bible is nonsense
Quran 5:6] "O you who believe, when you observe the Contact Prayers (Salat), you shall: (1) wash your faces, (2) wash your arms to the elbows, (3)wipe your heads, and (4) wash your feet to the ankles"
Alhamdulillah the Quran is Complete
هل في باب في البخاري لتحريم الموسيقي؟....لأ
Tolong di terjemahkan..,..karena saya tidak mengerti,apa yang di bicarakan.🙂
So what he is basically saying is the Quran is insufficient and imperfect? How can you call yourself a muslim if you don't believe the Quran is Al Khatim (the final revelation of Allah)?
Does anyone have the link or clip of saracen slandering black dunya .
Someone might have it but saracen actually admitted that he slandered Black dunya in Ali Dawah and Br.Syed live chat
hi
there is asimple wa toexplaine this
in our shools
we find aprograme given and ther isa teatcher to explaine this
looks like evry adia now we are explaiining
alwys some one to exlaine to each other
As an Atheist and casual observers of these debates, the one thing I don't understand is that I often hear Muslims distancing themselves from the Hadiths when quotes from those texts are used by it's detractors to incriminate the religion. So can anyone clarify for me if the Hadiths are generally regarded as a legitimate source of Islamic doctrine, or are they only recognised by certain sects of Islam?
Hi, generally speaking, ahadith are regarded as the second most authoritative source in Islam. However, they vary in terms of authenticity and the hadith scholars (for over 1450 years) have sourced the authentic hadiths and the inauthentic ones, and also those in between. Each hadith has its own 'grade' of authenticity. The best and most authentic hadiths are known as 'Saheeh' - they form the bedrock of many of the Isamic beliefs.
However there are weak ('da'if') hadith also but they can be used for virtues actions that aren't from the foundations of the religion, if certain conditions are meant (according to many classical scholars).
With regards to detractors incriminating the religion, then it is upon them to present sound and authentic evidence (from the Qur'an or Sahih hadiths) but unfortunately, you will find the ignorant among them resorting to citing weak or even completely rejected hadith, which carry zero weight in the religion, thus can not be called 'evidence'.
Hope this help and feel free to ask anything else :)
Abdus, Thank you for your comprehensive explanation. I appreciate the endeavour. The question of authenticity in regard to scripture has always been a key point of contention for me. And Islam is not unique from that perspective; all theistic doctrine falls under the same umbrella of ambiguity. It's almost impossible to verify the authenticity of these documents, so the validation rests with the fallacious appeal to authority (Scholars). In my submission, it's naïve to rely on the subjective interpretation of literature by Scholars to validate the instruction of divine command.
Perhaps I could request your indulgence for another question or two.
1. You mention "Sahih". Is this Sahih Bukhari?
2. Is the 'Sunnah' the same as the Hadith?
Sorry for the questions. But the subject interests me.
Thanks again.
TheLKline no Sahih means authentic. It can be from Bukhari or someone else. And sunnah means the example of the prophet ie.. the things he did or said
Thank you Goblinkiller. So Bukhari is basically regarded as an authentic scholar of the Hadiths? Does this mean that Bukhari determines through subjective interpretation which of the Hadiths are genuine?
TheLKline
Hi, Hadith is a really huge topic, very huge. No one has any doubt regarding the authenticity of Qur'an. Hadith is whatever Prophet said, did and commanded. Buhari compiled the Hadith and he took only the authentic Hadith and added in his compilation. It is not subjective. There is objective criteria to determine what is Sahih (authentic) and what is hasan (good) etc.
If you study the rigorous methodology of determining the authenticity of Hadith, you would consider the western academia as nothing, such was the objective standard of the Hadith because its the words and actions and commands of the Final messenger of God
my brother muslims,adnan just gave you a bare face lie when he gave you that verse,let me explain the lie,he gave you the verse ch16 v44,allah was talking about explaining it to the people of the book,read the verse before it ch16v43:and we sent not our messengers before you other than men that we inspired-ask the followers of the rememberance if you know not,ch16 v44:with clear proofs and writings and we have revealed to you the rememberance that you may explain ti mankind that which has been revealed for them and that perhaps thet may reflect
Khozran Hamid the verse is saying the prophet is explaining to the people what has been sent down so where is this explanation?
Goblinkiller
Where should the explanation be, if the Qur'an says it is *explained in detail???*
He's talking to people of the book if you read it slowly and ponder over it.the majority of the quran is so clear but a majority will ignore the clearness of the almighty and prefer mans interpretation which he warns us about.men who write with their own hands and say this is from your lord
Khozran Hamid
That is totally True.
For them it is easier to look at the premade Tafsir instead of actually reading in context the whole passage.
But the thing that many intentionally ignore or distort is that the Book says it is *fully detailed* (6:114).
If the Prophet was commanded to explain the Qur'an, then the explanation given by him has to be found somewhere in the same Book?
Don t worry muslim s understand who is lying and who speak with evidence and intellect
The verse doesn't even state what ever Adnans claim is.. Twisting it to fit his agenda
Whatever we not found in the Quran we find it in the Hadith.........akhi adnan what if hadith contradicts quran? what do we follow Hadith or Quran (revelation of Allah)?
authentic hadith dont condradicts quran.
@@nameless4477do we stone adulterers to death according to hadith or do we give them lashes according to Quran?
Bahasa subtitle please
Great Rashid and hijab
Adnan rashid is a liar on 5:23mins.
Quran 6:114 "Then it is other than Allah i should seek as judge while it is he who has revealed to you the book explained in detail? And Those to whom we gave the scripture know that it is sent down from your Lord in truth, so never be among the doubters."
Weak argument. The Quran is explained and strongly detailed through itself AND through the Prophet. What does that mean? You tell me.
@@bustarhymes6188 it means that it is Allah who is the true judge and it is him who has revealed the book EXPLAINED in FULL DETAIL!!!!.. Now a argument does not become weak just by you saying it. Now Show your argument against it without doing the dirty tactics like this channel does by telling others to show proof!! Its your time to show proof!!
May I ask have you got this thru reading the quran in Arabic of thru a translation if you dont mind me asking
Shah Kha yo bro these Hadith rejectors are ignorant. they dont read it in arabic. they read it straight through translation. from some random guy from the 21 first century
Many Mazabs. Many Hadiths.Many scholars from different groups each autheticate their own version.
People never learn from the people of the previous book. How sects came about in Christianity is exactly this way..
وَإِذَا لَمْ تَأْتِهِم بِآيَةٍ قَالُوا لَوْلَا اجْتَبَيْتَهَا قُلْ إِنَّمَا أَتَّبِعُ مَا يُوحَىٰ
إِلَيَّ مِن رَّبِّي هَٰذَا بَصَائِرُ مِن رَّبِّكُمْ وَهُدًى وَرَحْمَةٌ لِّقَوْمٍ يُؤْمِنُونَ
(7:203) And whenever you do not bring them a verse (for instance to answer their questions), they say: “Why didn’t you make up one?!” Proclaim (O Muhammad): “I follow exclusively (انما = exclusive particle) what isrevealed to me from my Lord”!
Yes he does! That’s why he the prophet ﷺ explained the Qurʾān as Allāh told him to! :)
Hadith is like a story source to support koran in details bcause Koran's already completed. Some of content in hadith need to be verify first before claim it to be true.
Quran is already complete,
So it needs no other Hadith.
He has legislated for you of the religion what He has instructed for Noah. What We inspired to you, and what We instructed for Abraham, Moses and Jesus, is that you should establish the religion and do not be divided therein. 42:13
Abraham was neither a Jew, nor a Nazarene (Christian); but he was a monotheist Muslim. He was not one of the mushrikeen. (those who set up partners with God). 3:67
You cannot eat Mohammad hijab, hadith says no cannibalism 😄😄😄
Adnan is lying, Allah never ever mentions to follow the Hadith , and that verse neither explains IT, hè gave his own interpretation to justify his Truth, which Allah never ever commanded.
YOU are lying. How do you pray, do hajj give zakaat without the prophets example. Is it in the quran how many rekaats or which moves you make? or do you receive your own revelations how to do ibadat.
PACKO Abdul KADIR How do you pray?
@@Badro29 these quranists never answer.
Rivalio Vegas you don’t even speak Arabic and you’re taking about his own interpretation.. the Quran says beat your wife, would you give her a black eye?
@@Player_Zeesh May Allah guide these Quranists or destroy them.
Lol notice the Christian guy in the background, looks like he's having a fit or something preaching.
Tolong tec bahasa Indonesianya.
Yea its true
Quran: "then in which Hadith
After Allah and His ayats
Will they believe?"/45:6.
Sunni/Shia: "Bukhari/Kafi
and this and that Hadith"
Quran: "these are the verses
Of the clear Book"/12:1.
Sunni/Shia: "no,
Quran isn't clear"
Quran: "We have certainly
Diversified in this Quran
From all examples"/18:54.
Sunni/Shia: "no,
Not all examples"
Quran: "He that is Who has
Revealed to you the Book
Explained in detail"/6:114
Sunni/Shia:
"Quran has no all the details,
No detail of the Prophet's life,
No detail of how to pray so on".
Quran: "O Prophet why do you
Prohibit which Allah made lawful
To please your wives?"/66:1
Sunni/Shia: "whatever Prophet
Said and did was all from wahi".
They are the obvious Quran Rejectors.
For 16:44
see 16:43, 3:187 & 12:1, 16:89, 5:99.
For 4:59
see 4:60, 3:128, 3:154, 12:39-40, 42:10.
For 4:65
see 4:60-65, 4:105, 6:114, (12:40).
For 59:7
see 42:36, 6:159, 5:99, 10:15, 41:6.
For 53:3-4
see 53:10, 42:52, 2:93 & 2:89, 6:19.
Context destroys their fake tafseers,
They're not scholars but clear scams,
their sects are clearly on uprooted lies.
Al-Isra' 17:81
وَقُلْ جَآءَ ٱلْحَقُّ وَزَهَقَ ٱلْبَٰطِلُۚ إِنَّ ٱلْبَٰطِلَ كَانَ زَهُوقًا
And say, "Truth has come, and falsehood has departed. Indeed is falsehood, [by nature], ever bound to depart."
Rashad khalifa and the likes did their damage
The 19'ers....
9:47 42 or 74?
I am gonna faint. God knows what kind of hell this Rashi will enter. Please people start studying the Quran by yourself to see how deceptive he is.
0:33 Rashid is hiding the fact that. Prophet explained the Quran through diversified verses:
And thus do We diversify the verses so the disbelievers will say, "You have studied," and so We may make the Qur'an clear for a people who know.6:105
الحمقى و الجهلة و هم يكذبون
Fools you shall not pass (hadits ) haha
Quran: "then in which Hadith
After Allah and His ayats
Will they believe?"/45:6.
Divided Sunni: "Bukhari
and this and that Hadith"
Quran: "these are the verses
Of the clear Book"/12:1.
Divided Sunni: "no,
Quran isn't clear"
Quran: "We have certainly
Diversified in this Quran
From all examples"/18:54.
Divided Sunni: "no,
Not all examples"
Quran: "He that is Who has
Revealed to you the Book
Explained in detail"/6:114
Divided Sunni:
"Quran has no all the details,
No detail of the Prophet's life,
No detail of how to pray so on".
Quran: "O Prophet why do you
Prohibit which Allah made lawful
To please your wives?"/66:1
Divided Sunni: "whatever Prophet
Said and did was all from wahi".
Pft, you're a joke Quran Rejectors👎
@@atraonlycowardsmuteme3285 keep dreaming
@@TheMarekduda you're the one wandering in your dream land of assumptions, you're just like pagan curse-tians, you worship Muhammad, as they worship Jesus, you say Muhammad can hear us all, as if Muhammad is all hearing, shirk, you say Muhammad can judge and order from himself, shirk, you say he parted the Moon, shirk, you say much stuff which is shirk, and in your prayer you talk to him who's in his grave, you're quburi mushriks and you kiss a black stone and you think that killing dogs and lizards can get you to Paradise, pft, you're the one dreaming.
Muhammad was just a MAILMAN, and Jesus was just a SLAVE, you guys like to hear that or not, they were just men like us as they claimed, Jesus is created like Adam/3:59, so he's like us, and Prophet Muhammad literally claimed to be a man like us/41:6.
They are HUMANS.
Muslims rely only upon God alone,
This is the message they taught,
Yet you pagans idolize humans.
Pagans.
Az-Zumar 39:45
وَإِذَا ذُكِرَ ٱللَّهُ وَحْدَهُ ٱشْمَأَزَّتْ قُلُوبُ ٱلَّذِينَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱلْءَاخِرَةِۖ وَإِذَا ذُكِرَ ٱلَّذِينَ مِن دُونِهِۦٓ إِذَا هُمْ يَسْتَبْشِرُونَ
And when Allah is mentioned alone, the hearts of those who do not believe in the Hereafter shrink with aversion, but when those [worshipped] other than Him are mentioned, immediately they rejoice.
@@atraonlycowardsmuteme3285 good to know let god jugde us all