Jethro Tull 1969 - 1970

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 июл 2024
  • Jethro Tull
    (Stockholm Master Reel 1969)
    Konserthuset, Stockholm, Sweden
    January 09, 1969
    ~ 1st show
    0:00 1. My Sunday Feeling
    5:46 2. Martin's Tune
    16:32 3. Dharma For One (Edit)
    20:11 4. Nothing Is Easy
    33:18 5. A Song For Jeffrey
    ~ 2nd show
    36:48 6. Back To The Family
    (Bootleg: Truth Is Like Freedom)
    Aragon Ballroom, Chicago, IL
    August 16, 1970
    41:17 7. My God
    51:49 8. To Cry You A Song
    57:21 9. With You There To Help Me
    1:01:32 10. Sossity, You're A Woman
    1:03:51 11. Reasons For Waiting
    1:07:21 12. We Used To Know
    1:16:20 13. For A Thousand Mothers
    Ian Anderson: Vocals, Flute
    Martin Barre: Guitar
    Glenn Cornick: Bass
    Clive Bunker:Drums
  • ВидеоклипыВидеоклипы

Комментарии • 20

  • @davidjutovsky-rc3ey
    @davidjutovsky-rc3ey 25 дней назад +7

    This is the SHIT! Awesome! Jethro Till are the bomb! Totally underrated band!

  • @chicklets4ever51
    @chicklets4ever51 24 дня назад +4

    This is pure gold.
    I saw Tull in Spring 1971 in a fantastic old theatre (small venue) in Rome, Italy, when they were unveiling the Aqualung album, which I hadn't heard yet. They were fantastic. Thanks so much posting this.

  • @davehall8280
    @davehall8280 26 дней назад +7

    So...I hafta say...this is phukking AWESOME!!!!!!! I can't thank you enough for this--who r u ??! dbh

    • @mlbloverock
      @mlbloverock  26 дней назад +3

      Check out my channels... I share the good stuff! I'm a guy in Florida, work on the beach doing weddings, just hit 63. It takes weeks to find and photoshop enough pics, eq audio and video editing to put something like this together. Thanks!

    • @John-eb5zk
      @John-eb5zk 25 дней назад +2

      That made me chuckle just a bit as I also hit 63 on the 24th, and I used to do photography for work for a time. And in reference to another comment -- for research to present a somewhat acceptable speech during my freshman year of college in 79/80, I found out that a "Jethro Tull" had actually invented 'row planting ' in England. I forget which century it supposedly occurred, and I don't know if the band ever discussed it or if it had any influence at all on their choice of a name.

  • @thischannelhasnoname5780
    @thischannelhasnoname5780 29 дней назад +5

    Terrific sound thank you

  • @johnhthayer4746
    @johnhthayer4746 Месяц назад +4

    Nice shows to choose from. I first heard these shows in the 80’s

  • @bwanna23
    @bwanna23 25 дней назад +10

    Hasn't Ian Anderson made a very nice contribution to the human race?

  • @robertduda6336
    @robertduda6336 21 день назад +3

    Loves me some Claghorn ….., Clive ripping them skins. Love the raw early Tull.

    • @nickburningham5143
      @nickburningham5143 18 дней назад

      Were they "raw"? I reckon they were a far more skilled band than the later Jethro Tull.

    • @robertduda6336
      @robertduda6336 17 дней назад +1

      “Raw” as in New and cutting edge. You never knew what form of musical wizardry they would perform for you.

  • @dragisaantic6568
    @dragisaantic6568 22 дня назад +2

    ❤❤❤❤

  • @coolmark4851
    @coolmark4851 18 дней назад +2

    Hey Wayne you listening to this.....

  • @richierugs6544
    @richierugs6544 Месяц назад +5

    There is no actual significance to their name. Apparently they had trouble getting booked because they weren't very good in the beginning and their manager had to keep changing their name in order to get booked anywhere, and by the time they got presentable the name Jethro Tull had been picked randomly. This according to an interview by Ian Andersen.

  • @richierugs6544
    @richierugs6544 Месяц назад +4

    His body of work is comparable to Pete Townshend. Saw this band a few times in this period, always great!

    • @chicklets4ever51
      @chicklets4ever51 24 дня назад +1

      Anderson is a much subtler and more sophisticated musician than Townshend. Anderson's rhythms are very complex and varied, and his compositions range across the gamut, while Townshend stays pretty much within a simple major/minor interplay. Nothing wrong with that, but Pete's not quite in Ian's league when viewed in any musical detail. "Thick as a Brick" blows "Tommy" entirely out of the water and is probably the best "rock opera" ever composed, with the added appeal of being totally tongue-in-cheek. Tull are "prog," while the Who are straight-ahead bluesless rock. Very different animals.

    • @richierugs6544
      @richierugs6544 24 дня назад +1

      @@chicklets4ever51 i was really speaking of the amount of Great stuff both have written, not about who is better at all, both groups were fantastic to see perform

    • @chicklets4ever51
      @chicklets4ever51 24 дня назад +1

      @@richierugs6544 Yes, I'm sure of that. The Who were certainly a great live band, though I never got to see them in person, only on film. "Tommy," on the other hand, never really did it for me, except for a few isolated cuts.

  • @user-dh1km7lc2x
    @user-dh1km7lc2x Месяц назад +2

    Nicol sictir

  • @nickburningham5143
    @nickburningham5143 18 дней назад +2

    The pre-Aqualung band with Cornick on bass was a great band. As you hear here, they could jam wonderfully, and Cornick to some extent led the jamming. Aqualung was a good album, but everything thereafter was whimsical and lightweight because Jethro Tull was no longer a top quality rock band, whatever Anderson's talents.. You can't really hear Cornick in the Chicago bootleg. He was about to leave the band, or be fired, much to their detriment.