The new JLTV was built for survivability and mobility in mind. These vehicles are intended to bring soldiers into a combat area, complete their mission and return safely. It can obviously protect soldiers way better than the current Humvee with its V-Shaped hull and side armor. My issue is the armor configuration. Currently, in any military base you'll see soldiers NOT use their armored Humvees for anything. When you go to the range, the last thing you want to use or drive is an armored truck. They are simply never used! The Army should develop a light skinned (non-armored) version for use back at home during training. I know this might piss some people off, however they probably have never ever used a Humvee (armored or non-armored). Troops will only use Non-Armored vehicles for field training back home. The last thing they want to do is to get into a heavy duty vehicle for simple field duties. Through the JLTV program the Department of Defence has replaced the Humvee (very much needed), however they need to create a model that can easily be used for training back home. What about creating lighter non-armored doors for training back home?
The biggest problem with any American army vehicle or aircraft is it’s cost. It may look good, it may even work great but it will definitely be expensive.
I believe this is around ~$400,000 USD for each model. From what I recall, though, it took a few pages from the MRAP program and is much more survivable in the scenarios where it will be used in comparison with the HMMWV. The Hummer is currently about half that cost, but you have to keep in mind it's been in production for a few decades now and thus that's kind of an unfair comparison. What's a cheaper, non-American alternative?
No, if you compare the price of one of these to the British it is MUCH less expensive than the Ocelot / Foxhound vehicle which is designed to perform a similar job. As the US will build JLTV in vast numbers the UK will reap the benefit of lower unit cost that it brings. It makes sense to pay this vehicle and it certainly looks like a well designed platform.
Kept asking myself why the machine gunner is so horribly exposed on top of the Hummer, when I left the 'Corps. Thank you for addressing that shortcoming!
GiacomoKnox It’s not no more we have a system where you can sit inside and control the gunner from a remote control and it’s way more accurate it can single out a single person and hit them perfectly (what my sergeant told me)
@@xmanykl4400 The vehicles I drove were the M-ATV and Maxxpro model MRAPS. We couldn't even roll out in anything smaller like a humvee in 2011 and 2013 when I was deployed
Benzinio no it isnt, a single rpg will disable a gclass, this vech is segmented into 3 parts, cargo, crew compartment, and engine. Also it is built from the ground up armored, with a v hull it can also drive thru walls and buildings....merica
@@pillcosby546, it IS a good military vehicle. It just isn't an MRAP, but in its weight/payload class it is one of the best military vehicles out there.
It appears to lack a defense system that prevents it being hijacked by anti- US militias and passed on to their Iranian allies exposing some of America's sensitive military technology to Tehran and potentially endangering the lives of US troops in other conflict zones. This should be addressed......
The lighting for your dramatic opening just really sucks! It sucks so bad that I stopped watching it 37 seconds in to the video! Try some substance rather than smoke and mirrors mr. DeMille!
Anything STILL addicted to fossil fuels is going to be useless pretty soon. How soon? Not sure but we're building (by contract) troop transport and other weapons that will not run on solar power. Why? Battery powered vehicles have lots of attributes that last longer, are less dependent on transportation of fuels etc. This is wasteful government spending to enrich a small group of greedy people.
It's faster to fill a vehicle with fuel than it is to charge w/ electricity. Solar powered vehicles would take days to charge and would depend on sunny days. The technology for electric vehicles is just not ready for combat yet.
@@zynon3253 the technology exists they refuse to consider it in order to keep the fossil fuel industry going. The existence of batteries alone knocks the ''sun must be shining'' argument out. The fastest car on the planet in a drag race is electric. The switch to green energy has to come sooner than later if we're to survive.
You mean the engine is not protected? That's the good thing about this vehicle. All the protection is for the occupants. The problem with the Humvee is that everything is protected and the vehicle is so heavy that it sinks in the sand. The Humvee is not a very good off-road vehicle and it doesn't go very fast. Not only is the Humvee excessively heavy, but it does not have very good protection for the occupants. The JLTV is not a stupid design, it's a brilliant design. You just have to understand why it's made the way it is.
-It's so badass, that we used more 3D renders of it than actual footage of it.
Acquire them for your miltia ASAP.
This is one of the most beautiful military cars i have ever seen. I really would like to get one in civil version, it's really amazing car
I work at Oshkpsh And build these BAD BOYS
THANK YOU
Looks like Arnold will be making a few calls.
The new JLTV was built for survivability and mobility in mind. These vehicles are intended to bring soldiers into a combat area, complete their mission and return safely. It can obviously protect soldiers way better than the current Humvee with its V-Shaped hull and side armor.
My issue is the armor configuration. Currently, in any military base you'll see soldiers NOT use their armored Humvees for anything. When you go to the range, the last thing you want to use or drive is an armored truck. They are simply never used!
The Army should develop a light skinned (non-armored) version for use back at home during training.
I know this might piss some people off, however they probably have never ever used a Humvee (armored or non-armored). Troops will only use Non-Armored vehicles for field training back home. The last thing they want to do is to get into a heavy duty vehicle for simple field duties.
Through the JLTV program the Department of Defence has replaced the Humvee (very much needed), however they need to create a model that can easily be used for training back home.
What about creating lighter non-armored doors for training back home?
Very good JLTV
Arnold did it once, can he bring a second brand to the civilian marketplace? lol
Joint vehicle? Do you mean...
Smoke weed everyday!
High speed, long drag.
Proud to live in Oshkosh!
Who else wants a civilian version of this thing
To vote yes say FUCK YEAH
to vote no say FUCK YEAH
Oshkosh YOU are a company that does things 1st class I wish the best for the JLTV I'm giving it the NICKNAME: Jolie !!!!!!!!!!!
love seeing what I make :)
Congratulations for your creation
Love driving what you made! Rah
@@zynon3253 Thank you for serving 🇺🇲
The biggest problem with any American army vehicle or aircraft is it’s cost. It may look good, it may even work great but it will definitely be expensive.
You have good points. But us American like to know our troops have the best equipment. Lol
I believe this is around ~$400,000 USD for each model. From what I recall, though, it took a few pages from the MRAP program and is much more survivable in the scenarios where it will be used in comparison with the HMMWV. The Hummer is currently about half that cost, but you have to keep in mind it's been in production for a few decades now and thus that's kind of an unfair comparison.
What's a cheaper, non-American alternative?
No, if you compare the price of one of these to the British it is MUCH less expensive than the Ocelot / Foxhound vehicle which is designed to perform a similar job. As the US will build JLTV in vast numbers the UK will reap the benefit of lower unit cost that it brings. It makes sense to pay this vehicle and it certainly looks like a well designed platform.
Price doesnt matter,but qaulity and battle proven desingn is..
nothing new iiiii
Kept asking myself why the machine gunner is so horribly exposed on top of the Hummer, when I left the 'Corps. Thank you for addressing that shortcoming!
GiacomoKnox It’s not no more we have a system where you can sit inside and control the gunner from a remote control and it’s way more accurate it can single out a single person and hit them perfectly (what my sergeant told me)
Joy stick operation behind the driver
Where do I pre-order, or opt for a 3 year 12k miles lease
Fascinating!
Any idea on unit cost?
400k $$
Ye around half a million
Free
@@alqaeda7040 🤣
Any possible way civilians can buy?
Perfekt 👍🇱🇹🇺🇸🤝
All dislikes are from the Taliban thinking this was an instructional video
Aesthetically speaking I prefer the Humvee. The back of this looks weird.
Good
Hummer is a good off road also but very little protection from ieds. Is this one any better????????
It has a v shaped under hull so yes
Can this be bought by the public? Or only for sale to governments?
Огонь 🔥 тачка, дайте две!
It's unfair how we dont have such a cool commercial/reveal trailer for our new Hawkei 7 tonne truck for our Aussie Troops
lol
@@nathanielbean3119 lol yourself...
Is it for sale?
Yeah, you can buy it for 500k-600k $
So basically this is an armored trophy truck with all the trimmings
These vehicles comes with A/C? All the Ones to be issued to the armed forces comes with A/C?
Yeah and they work great too. I used to keep my drinks cool by placing whatever I was drinking on the vent on long convoys in Afghanistan
@@jamesg512 Great! The JLTV is already operational in Afghanistan o you're talking about the Humvees?
@@xmanykl4400 The vehicles I drove were the M-ATV and Maxxpro model MRAPS. We couldn't even roll out in anything smaller like a humvee in 2011 and 2013 when I was deployed
@@jamesg512 I understand now and Thank You for your service. 👍👍
That is an anti-zombie vehicle, great for Halloween! :-D
Seriously though, this vehicle is epic, I guess it has wheels that can resist a flat tire.
Better than a Warhog from HALO
I had no idea that the arma 3 hunter was supposed to be amazing lol.
Tatra Titus cost the same 400.000USD
Civilian version hmmm...
방어력이 선택의 최우선이었다고 하는군요
God Bless America!
Not Politically Correct no
Music name?
Roll over rating on this is way better. Humvee's can only handle 33 degrees on each side.
Interesting, what light stands for in the name 5 tonnes :D
G-class is still the better choice as a platform, no matter it is near 40 year old now...
Benzinio no it isnt, a single rpg will disable a gclass, this vech is segmented into 3 parts, cargo, crew compartment, and engine. Also it is built from the ground up armored, with a v hull it can also drive thru walls and buildings....merica
Benzinio You can tell the Germans haven't been fighting any wars when they think a fucking G-Class is a good military vehicle.
@@pillcosby546, it IS a good military vehicle. It just isn't an MRAP, but in its weight/payload class it is one of the best military vehicles out there.
💪💪💪💪
Lmao what's with the Asturias (Leyenda) remix in the background?
Masamang pwet!
You should see an Ejder Yalçın (Turkish tactical jeep).
yasin turfullu :D
Alper Aladağ 👍😂
it woud eat it alive XD
Belgium bought it
Doesn't OshKosh also make infant clothes??
Different Oshkosh.
Kinda like Gerber ( baby food), Gerber (knives), and Gerber (toilets)
Be Gosh darnit your right!
Give me one i live with it.
so ... ARMA 3 is officially here
this would be badass in black sure, but in sand its just plain milifugly.
camouflage
Probably better off as a drone or bot!
It appears to lack a defense system that prevents it being hijacked by anti- US militias and passed on to their Iranian allies exposing some of America's sensitive military technology to Tehran and potentially endangering the lives of US troops in other conflict zones. This should be addressed......
Let's hope this model doesn't fall on the hands of ISIS by the hundreds, like the hummer...
Shutup and take my money!!!!
Wait a year. OSHKASH will be on a discount sale in CHINA.
The lighting for your dramatic opening just really sucks!
It sucks so bad that I stopped watching it 37 seconds in to the video!
Try some substance rather than smoke and mirrors mr. DeMille!
found this presentation lacking; no depth, no details, lots of rocking music ....
just a rehash of old footage really
Finally replacing the problematic HMMWV.
Omg
装甲車
What is this ugly MG-module on top of it? Is it _manned_ ???
шо попало
USA
asfghjk gahsjks blah blah
Anything STILL addicted to fossil fuels is going to be useless pretty soon. How soon? Not sure but we're building (by contract) troop transport and other weapons that will not run on solar power. Why? Battery powered vehicles have lots of attributes that last longer, are less dependent on transportation of fuels etc.
This is wasteful government spending to enrich a small group of greedy people.
It's faster to fill a vehicle with fuel than it is to charge w/ electricity. Solar powered vehicles would take days to charge and would depend on sunny days. The technology for electric vehicles is just not ready for combat yet.
@@zynon3253 the technology exists they refuse to consider it in order to keep the fossil fuel industry going. The existence of batteries alone knocks the ''sun must be shining'' argument out. The fastest car on the planet in a drag race is electric. The switch to green energy has to come sooner than later if we're to survive.
Engine not protection. Stupid design.
You mean the engine is not protected? That's the good thing about this vehicle. All the protection is for the occupants. The problem with the Humvee is that everything is protected and the vehicle is so heavy that it sinks in the sand. The Humvee is not a very good off-road vehicle and it doesn't go very fast. Not only is the Humvee excessively heavy, but it does not have very good protection for the occupants. The JLTV is not a stupid design, it's a brilliant design. You just have to understand why it's made the way it is.