Linear Attenuation Coefficient (LAC) and Mass Attenuation Coefficient | Radiology Physics Course #27

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 дек 2024
  • High yield radiology physics past paper questions with video answers
    Perfect for testing yourself prior to your radiology physics exam 👇
    ➡️ X-RAY, ULTRASOUND AND MRI BUNDLE (SAVE over 25%): www.radiologyt...
    ➡️ X-RAY QUESTION BANK: www.radiologyt...
    ➡️ ULTRASOUND QUESTION BANK: www.radiologyt...
    ➡️ MRI QUESTION BANK: www.radiologyt...
    =========================
    I have also created two RADIOPAEDIA LEARNING PATHWAYS
    bit.ly/radiopa... (👈 25% OFF DISCOUNT LINK)
    WHAT’S INCLUDED?
    ✅This RUclips series Ad free
    ✅Constantly updated Radiopaedia articles
    ✅Summary slides
    ✅Key take home bullet points throughout
    ✅Multiple review quizzes
    ✅Short answer review questions
    ✅Official Radiopaedia course completion certificate
    25% discount using this link: bit.ly/radiopa...
    =========================
    The linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) determines the proportion of X-rays that are removed from the beam per unit distance. We will review the function of a coefficient and how that should help us to conceptualise LAC. LAC is determined by the combination of the photoelectric effect, compton scatter and rayleigh scatter - therefore, the X-ray beam energy, density of the tissue and atomic number of the tissue all contribute to the LAC.
    =========================
    SIGN UP TO MY MONTHLY EMAIL NEWSLETTER 👉 bit.ly/3ruLh3d
    Not sure if the question banks are for you?
    If you're here, you're likely studying for a radiology physics exam. I've spent the last few months collating past papers from multiple different countries selecting the most commonly asked questions. You'll be surprised how often questions repeat themselves!
    The types of questions asked in FRCR, RANZCR AIT, ARRT, FC Rad Diag (SA), ABR qualifying Core Physics and MICR part 1 are surprisingly similar and the key concepts remain the same throughout. I've taken the most high-yield questions and answered them in video format so that I can take you through why certain answers are correct and others are not.
    Happy studying,
    Michael
    #radiology #radres #FOAMrad #FOAMed

Комментарии • 35

  • @zer0legend109
    @zer0legend109 3 месяца назад +5

    correction at 11:28, when we over exposure the image everything gets black because attenuation decreases and more beam is reaching the x-ray detectors, it's probably just a tongue slip, nonetheless a correction has to be made so no one gets confused

  • @aabidhameed4286
    @aabidhameed4286 Год назад +15

    Would you please do with CT physics, it's giving me alot of problems.

  • @erfanzarenia2579
    @erfanzarenia2579 3 месяца назад +2

    Perfect tutorial! Thanks a lot.
    Respectfully, I think you made a mistake though. In 11:25 you said in over exposed images everything looks white, but in fact, over exposure makes radiographs seem darker.
    That was 100% a slip of the tongue, but I thought you may want to correct that in caption.
    Thanks again.

  • @ChrispyNugget
    @ChrispyNugget Год назад +5

    Thank you so much for adding the graph for the maths equation. It definitely gives me the euraka moment when I saw them together, as I could relate it to the half-life physics. I can understand what you mean by exponential decay equation now. As the half life is dealing with time, this equation is dealing in term of thickness of the tissue and the linear attenuation coefficient. There is no way I would figure it without watching your explanation!
    The information you present was really well laid out, and it was really easy to understand.

    • @radiologytutorials
      @radiologytutorials  Год назад +1

      That’s great to hear. Love a Eureka moment 💡you’re spot on about the equation!

  • @freemedicaladvice6866
    @freemedicaladvice6866 Год назад +7

    Immensely great work...
    It would be highly appreciated if you could make more videos on whole physics course

  • @MrMusicm7
    @MrMusicm7 7 месяцев назад

    You saved me to understand those concept
    I graduated 2016 and haven’t read a physics sentence since them
    I got RSO exam soon and this material was very helpful thanks

  • @ZahraHassani-ld7rm
    @ZahraHassani-ld7rm Год назад

    you are beyond perfect at your work. Thank you so much for sharing this valuable video, Now I got this concept immensely.

  • @ClaireWhittaker-b6m
    @ClaireWhittaker-b6m 11 месяцев назад

    I truly cannot thank you enough. Seriously saved my life prepping for my veterinary radiology prelim boards! thank you thank you thank you

  • @prasheedhaa4234
    @prasheedhaa4234 Год назад +2

    Very informative .... Great job

  • @shwetayadav9291
    @shwetayadav9291 Год назад +1

    Great lecture

  • @Elyrion4409
    @Elyrion4409 3 месяца назад

    Are your x ray question banks and these radiology videos also geared towards the USA radiology CORE exams? Thanks for the amazing content. You're a legend.

  • @pritambhowmik2204
    @pritambhowmik2204 Год назад

    Great and intuitive work. I have a doubt though.Does linear attenuation
    coefficient depend on thickness of a particular material which is used as a medium given photon energy of incident ray, density of this material and atomic number constant?

  • @jessicapotter169
    @jessicapotter169 Год назад

    could you please show some examples of equations using the LAC formula and go through them please?

  • @YousefAlotaibi-g7h
    @YousefAlotaibi-g7h Год назад

    You’re the best!

  • @DocRad3
    @DocRad3 4 месяца назад +1

    Thanks a lot sir . But Over exposure makes xray image dark , but u said white . Isn’t it sir ?

  • @riio15
    @riio15 Год назад

    Great Job~ I just wanted to note that It would have been better in u included the math behind the Mue equation, I mean its not a complicated one. Just as delta x -> 0 we can drive N as a function of x with a simple drivative. I like knowing things in depth and thats why i love watching u so im just saying for future refrences, have a nice day dear!

    • @radiologytutorials
      @radiologytutorials  Год назад

      The first time I recorded this I went through this equation (it’s definitely nice to know for people like us who like math). Just don’t want to scare people away so early on 😂 Your simple derivative is another persons nightmare 😅

  • @MagdalenaBrzozowska-p6w
    @MagdalenaBrzozowska-p6w Год назад +1

    Hej! Thank you for such a great lectures!!!! I would like to ask you one question about what you said in this lecture above. You say that when we overexpose the image everything will be bright. But for example Radiopaedia say that it is burnt out (dark) when it is overexposed? I am confused now :P Please help!

    • @radiologytutorials
      @radiologytutorials  Год назад +1

      Hi 👋🏼 Can’t remember what I said exactly. I was mistaken if I said overexposed looks bright 😅 You are right an overexposed image is dark!

  • @caposolomon8745
    @caposolomon8745 Месяц назад

    This is my health physics life now

  • @robertFat804
    @robertFat804 Месяц назад

    What would a radiographic image look like if photon energy remains relatively low, but the number of photons emitted by the x-ray source is significantly higher?

  • @fahimfaisal1776
    @fahimfaisal1776 2 месяца назад

    Please take lectures on radiation oncology

  • @ashalarfaj7724
    @ashalarfaj7724 Год назад

    Are you sure everything starts to be white when we increase photon energy? it seems most of the photons are transmitted and everything becomes dark(black).

  • @ShamiAshRadiologist
    @ShamiAshRadiologist Год назад

    Can you make lectures on pathology chapter wise pls

  • @Radio_nerds
    @Radio_nerds 9 месяцев назад

    Mass attenuation coefficient is inversely proportional to the radiation energy. It’s true or false

  • @sohailkohri7269
    @sohailkohri7269 Год назад +1

    ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

  • @a.akhrif1492
    @a.akhrif1492 Год назад

    How is N=No*e(-ux) derived?

    • @dontstop9052
      @dontstop9052 Месяц назад

      If we will take a very thin layer (dx) and N - N0 will be also dN, then u can integrate the
      upper equality

  • @radioboy-oi8yd
    @radioboy-oi8yd Год назад

    in every source i read i see that Mac is independent on density , I am confused when I see that mac =m/p , if it is independent on density why there is density in the formula?

    • @radiologytutorials
      @radiologytutorials  Год назад

      Great question. MAC = u/p. Linear attenuation coefficient (u) has density accounted for in its value. Dividing by density will cancel out the density contribution to LAC (u).