I believe HS regs tend to undercall w/o deeper read vs me. My main bluff region would be hands like this that XR the flop. But these hands mainly bet turn. So the B x B lines here has underbluffing "perceived" proprieties. I have a,lot of values played the same way. KJ KQ, 4x sometimes. So I do believe the bluff is okay. It's cool to bluff even if you're "high in your range" when your range is not perceived with too many bluff. We have to notice this is an exploitative strategy. I should adapt mine as soon as the guy saw me.
On the 77 first hand, do your think this will be underbluffed line by most regs even on highstakes like this? It seems very hard to bluff something here on xx xr against two without the combodraw wich will mostly giveup in river?
It's a fish there. A whale even, so I'm not looking into datapoint and I'm taking the highest EV line. Even if it means representing too strong vs the reg
@@YolanCohenPoker R u kidding me ? Respect man - just interested why you approached it like this ? (I'm a PLO player, don't matter though, nice channel)
I love the dedication to the details with timing vs the recs
hello, i don't understand your bluff with 64 at 15:00, did you target pockets ? dont you fear to get caught too often with that size? nice vid
I believe HS regs tend to undercall w/o deeper read vs me.
My main bluff region would be hands like this that XR the flop. But these hands mainly bet turn.
So the B x B lines here has underbluffing "perceived" proprieties. I have a,lot of values played the same way. KJ KQ, 4x sometimes. So I do believe the bluff is okay.
It's cool to bluff even if you're "high in your range" when your range is not perceived with too many bluff.
We have to notice this is an exploitative strategy. I should adapt mine as soon as the guy saw me.
@@YolanCohenPoker ok interesting, thanks
How come your Sharkscope for GG only shows c. £800 profit? Did you turn it off?
Music a bit loud and cover the voice sometimes. Also can u able the auto subtitles. cheers.
first song is summoningsalt music ;)
Huge fan here :p
On the 77 first hand, do your think this will be underbluffed line by most regs even on highstakes like this? It seems very hard to bluff something here on xx xr against two without the combodraw wich will mostly giveup in river?
It's a fish there. A whale even, so I'm not looking into datapoint and I'm taking the highest EV line. Even if it means representing too strong vs the reg
Salut
Pourquoi tu ne bet pas turn a 6min40 de vidéo avec KT sur cette texture ?
Dude it’s really hard to understand and the music doesn’t help
It will be improved, thank you for the feedback
Que paso con el boicot a GG por el alto Rake ?? ya se lo bajaron ??
This is footage from January. I think they let the rake like this, and less regs are playing.
Will check in the next months how the actions is going.
Turn music volume down please
Join the community discord here ! discord.gg/RjFJFQSeFc
Hes back
How many hands in your experice a proffesisonal poker player plays a day on average
Depends. I would say 30k hhs from what i saw.
@@YolanCohenPoker u mean 30k hands per month!!
@@speakarabicnow-GBD yes 30-75k per month is pretty normal for midstakes and lower. High stakes players sometimes less if they only play high stakes.
At least 6
@@Brazz27 🤣
For how long have you been playing poker?
Studying 5 years.
Playing 3 years
@@YolanCohenPoker wait, you started studying before you started playing?
@@jimmyballs5662 didnt play 1 hand for ~ 2 years. Only studied.
@@YolanCohenPoker R u kidding me ? Respect man - just interested why you approached it like this ? (I'm a PLO player, don't matter though, nice channel)
@@YolanCohenPoker wow... you are really good to just play so short
also--- nice discipline ! 2 entire years just studying. cool ! way to go
Tout est bien sauf la sique.
Calling 4b with j7s lol
First
Omg, playing 5k one table, and miss read the efective two pair with A 9? Jaja insane lucky river, and dont tacke value from it. Mega fish.
If you wanna heads-up a fish then contact me on discord😁
@@YolanCohenPokerA fish you definitely are!