Strange. Are you familiar with Foundherentism? if so, what are your thoughts on it. I know that people like Susan Haack and Roderick Long come to mind.
Hmm, I'm not sure that I feel one way or another about it. I do enjoy studying Marx, he's probably one of my favorite philosophers to read, but I'm not a Marxist myself. So I'm interested in studying dialectical materialism (or, perhaps I should say "historical materialism" as Marx himself termed it), but only for academic reasons.
I'd say modern schools of foundationalism are probably the more plausible -- Cartesian foundationalism still has a place in the history of philosophy, but I don't know if many people still subscribe to it (though I'm sure there's somebody out there!) What's your take on foundationalism/coherentism?
I should clarify that I think Descartes' infallibilist approach is a big part of what makes his epistemology a harder sell -- the idea that "knowledge = certainty" might make sense within the framework of Descartes' own philosophy, but I think fallibilism is probably a better way to go (...though I could be wrong!)
@@dylangoddard7449 you have no idea how perfect the timing was. your comment demonstrates that belief is more important than knowledge. this should be taught in schools. we choose what knowledge to believe in by the concepts we accept as being true. the concepts we believe in and express with language, both by speech and by thougjt, define the box we constrain ourselves to live in. wow.
Strange.
How do you feel about strange comments?
Strange.
How do you feel about Varsity Football?
Strange.
How do you feel about Heidegger's Resolute Dasein?
Strange.
How do you feel about Transcendental Idealism?
Strange.
How do you feel about semantic opportunism?
Strange.
How do you feel about Asynchronous Chronomancy?
Strange.
Are you familiar with Foundherentism? if so, what are your thoughts on it. I know that people like Susan Haack and Roderick Long come to mind.
Strange.
How do you feel about decoupling couplers?
Strange.
How do you feel about dialectical materialism?
Hmm, I'm not sure that I feel one way or another about it. I do enjoy studying Marx, he's probably one of my favorite philosophers to read, but I'm not a Marxist myself. So I'm interested in studying dialectical materialism (or, perhaps I should say "historical materialism" as Marx himself termed it), but only for academic reasons.
Strange.
How do you feel about integrative complexity?
Strange.
How do you feel about Aristo-Thomism?
Which Epistemology do you believe is more plausible?
Between foundationalism and coherentism? I think foundationalism is probably the more plausible one.
@@VarsityBookworm which form of foundationalism: modest or classical?
I'd say modern schools of foundationalism are probably the more plausible -- Cartesian foundationalism still has a place in the history of philosophy, but I don't know if many people still subscribe to it (though I'm sure there's somebody out there!)
What's your take on foundationalism/coherentism?
I should clarify that I think Descartes' infallibilist approach is a big part of what makes his epistemology a harder sell -- the idea that "knowledge = certainty" might make sense within the framework of Descartes' own philosophy, but I think fallibilism is probably a better way to go (...though I could be wrong!)
Strange, how do you feel a out Magnum Odometers?
Strange.
How do you feel about Femboy Hooters?
not subscribing to any foundational beliefs is to hold a foundational belief that there are no foundational beliefs
But surely you can withhold belief rather than saying you are certain there are no foundational beliefs
@@dylangoddard7449 yes indeed. but where did you learn that? I wish they would have taught me that in school. lol.
@@gk10101 I was just theorising, I have no idea really😂
@@dylangoddard7449 you have no idea how perfect the timing was.
your comment demonstrates that belief is more important than knowledge. this should be taught in schools.
we choose what knowledge to believe in by the concepts we accept as being true.
the concepts we believe in and express with language, both by speech and by thougjt, define the box we constrain ourselves to live in.
wow.
@@dylangoddard7449 everything i just said was a concept that can be debated. wow. its an endless regress. but I guess that is debatable
Strange.
How do you feel about Easy Answerism?