Westward Expansion 042 Custer and the Washita

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 6

  • @Prairiewolf45
    @Prairiewolf45 5 месяцев назад +1

    According to Wikipedia. The Union had over 2.1 million soldiers during the war, with a peak strength of 700K in uniform at one time.
    G. A. Custer's permanent rank of Lt. Col. Was due to his position as 2nd in command of the 7th US Cavalry Regiment. The actual commander was a Col. Sturgis detached for other duties.
    The post civil war army basically assigned their officers to duty positions based on seniority and civil war record. For instance Sheridan and Sherman remained Generals but Custer and Benteen who was a brevet Brigider General were slotted in Lt. Col and Major positions respectively.

  • @PaulinAsia_
    @PaulinAsia_ 5 месяцев назад

    I personally would not refer to the systemic theft and occupation of native American land and the ethnic cleansing of a people as expansion.

    • @pagedown4195
      @pagedown4195 5 месяцев назад

      Andrew Jackson Removal act, Martin Van Buren.

    • @proftroysmith6282
      @proftroysmith6282  5 месяцев назад +1

      “U.S. Westward Expansion” is the name of the course I was asked to teach, and this is how I teach it. My academic specialty is Native American history and culture, and I am in fact a board member of my state’s chapter of AIM- I make sure the reality of what you describe above is discussed in thorough detail, as you will see if you watched the whole lecture series from the beginning (or keep watching the newer ones). I can’t change the title, though, or my students currently taking the class with that name wouldn’t be able to find it. In general, though, you’re absolutely right. I have another lecture series, also on my playlist page, called Tribes of the Great Plains that gives on overview of these events from the indigenous perspective.

    • @praetoriandorn3154
      @praetoriandorn3154 5 месяцев назад

      Why is it only bad when white people conquer territory for themselves? Should we not apply the same moral judgement to the Indians, to whom conquering and domination of others were also a way of life?