as the man himself mentioned, the problem is connectivity and energy/space/pressure/moisture-constraints..its hard, thats probably why we know so very much less about the ocean.. i wished i was able to study marine engineering, i always dreamed about working on subs... :)
Crazy to think how primitive all these robots are - the first ones are barely 30 years old and were made in the lifetime of most viewers. I imagine this is kind of what airplanes felt like in the 1920’s. If history is any guide, these aquatic drones are going to get A LOT better in the next 10-20 years.
As the First World War accelerated aircraft development, so the Ukraine war is accelerating drone development in the air and at sea. Future wars will contribute too. This will eventually result in improvements in civilian technology as with aviation post WW1 & 2. Interesting stuff. All the best. 🐟
WWI saw many innovations, some of which spilled into peace-time, but human civilization will never be what it could have been were the World Wars averted. I know this sounds like a truism, but let me break it down further: It's simply impossible for us to recover ourselves, or imagine recovering ourselves, from something so titanically iniquitous as WORLD WAR, nor is it even possible to imagine a different outcome at this point. A climate of open-mindedness was emerging (at least in Europe) right before WWI that I fear we may never experience again as a species. There was an optimism at play at that point in history, culturally speaking, which would have been able to overcome all the vices we now associate with nihilism caused by constant warfare and maintenance of standing armies. The world would have continued to be multipolar, would have simply slowly moved away from colonialism. The concentration of power in the old nobility would have inevitably eroded, was already eroding, regardless of the World Wars, and even the human population might have grown at a slower rate, had there not been the threat and reality of so many of us dying in such a short amount of time due to not only conventional warfare, but nuclear warfare. Humanity lost about 100 million people due to these completely unnecessary wars, and several governments continue to argue that low birthrates are a threat threat to national security. I wish I could communicate what I mean. @@ivancho5854
@@josephyoung6749 Sadly everything you say is true. I have been all over Europe and today in every single country I see the scars of the First and Second World Wars and the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe. The loss was unimaginable in scale and its impact continues. My mother had to be dug out of her house as a child and it is by sheer luck that I am able to converse with you now. A quarter of the men in my family died in WW1. Although they were not inevitable I think that biggest factor in Europe not continuing the pattern of the preceding centuries was the development of nuclear weapons, though that hasn't stopped war from returning to Europe in Ukraine. Unfortunately the devastation of cities there today is again unbelievable. Go in peace my friend Joseph.
when I was a kid, I used to go spear fishing in southern CA. One time I saw a large stingray in the sand. I tried to swim down to it and it vanished in blink of an eye. pacific stingray can go 30 mph :)
Veritaserum made a brilliant video about the insane competition in which hobbyists race robot mice automatically solving mazes, I'm convinced that there are people who would build better fish robots than all these scientists combined after having a competition like this for just a couple of years...
if the goal of the company is to make the fastest progress, they'd pay like a 100k prize pool. Not sure how well you can absorb the findings like legally
Lol this was literally my Master's thesis. Watching this video was like reading the background section of my thesis. I was looking at using piezo composites (called Macro Fibre Composites) as thrust producing fins. Cool stuff.
can you poiint me to good references for schauberger, i am immensely interested in quality material about him. it seems unreal, but not quite too much to take it slighty serious. and the potential is amazing!
@@craigchamberlain1 only if you dont look into it! ...and that coming from a guy who is quick to discard anything resembling fancy bs theories without scientific rigour behind it. There is something there. According to my own observations about flowing water, as well as all the documented phenomena displayed by HO2 and some other compounds that arent quite understood.
I went to college with Jason, amazing to see how deep he has gone! I only did 1m and got out, it was obvious even at swimming he was a deep diver because of his metal skeleton! Proud of u big J!
@bubbasplants189 instead of vortices let us imagine a pair of vertical rollers like a car wash. If they roll as shown, the fish will be sucked backwards. The fish could push the centers of the vortices backwards while getting an extra push from the rotation in the direction of motion.
power to thrust ratio! a very sfc adjacent metric. (specific fuel consumption) my personal favorite cursed units are lb/hr and lbf (pounds per hour fuel flow : pound-force), though not too relevant to underwater vehicles that can't burn fuel
One of the oldest submarine concepts I ever heard about was one. called the "steinhuder hecht" (pike of lake steinhude), it was supposed to conect a fortress in the lake to it's allies, including portugal. Something supposedly was built in 1772, but i doubt it got too far. It's not really known, afaik. Wiki article in english, german, spanish, italian: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steinhuder_Hecht
Great video, but missing the best finned robots around, from Pliant Energy Systems. They swim beautifully but can also move over land, ice, etc. No other efforts come close!
We are still a LONG way away from figuring out why certain things in nature work the way they do. The tuna and bumblebee laugh at our attemps to mimick their awesomeness!
see Viktor Schauberger. if only half of his story is true...theres an insane documentary from austria about him, water and its remarkable physics/chemistry...i cant remember the name, unfortunately.
To be fair, it's basically impossible to evolve something like a propeller in nature, and they do work pretty well for providing 1-dimensional thrust while also being relatively easy to design and construct. Evolution is very good at optimizing a system, but it doesn't create *the* optimal system. Fitness has to improve or at least stay roughly the same in an evolutionary system, so it gets stuck in local-maxima in the absence of environmental changes. It's the same as the classic "why haven't animals have evolved wheels" question. I could imagine a hybrid design being ideal instead, with a rear propeller for main thrust and fin-like structures on the sides, top, or bottom for maneuverability. There's no reason we can't have the best of all worlds.
I vaguely recall that nature has evolved a universal type joint which rotates under power at the microscopic level. Sorry that I can't remember more, I do know that when I read about it I was stunned at what I thought was impossible. All the best.
In my opinion sarcopterygii is a clade defined by a common ancestor not a Paraphyly without tetrapods. A guy made some toxic comments so I had to clarify.
What a fluid mechanics powerhouse Applied Maths at the University of Cambridge, UK was/is! As well as Michael Lighthill, featured here, there is Sir G.I. Taylor, who famously calculated the power of the first atom bomb from published photos and Sir George Bachelor, who studied turbulence, a horribly difficult subject.
this is the least shady thing DARPA has done lately. though now i'm gonna have to add clunky fish roaming around surveilling the deep to the back of my mind forever
If straight out swimming speed is the goal, consider Istioform, or how sailfish swim. These things can hit 110 km/h, which is quite remarkable when you account for the much higher drag in water. Trevallies (carangiform) and tuna (thunniform) are no match.
A robot battery powered fish if designed properly could be able to recharge its own batteries by anchoring itself into a water current by its nose/mouth /rod connected to internal motor/generator while body spins around it.😮 Just a thought, putting it out there. 😮
crazy to think the idea of needing to engenier robots that are able to respond to predators, like, isnt it basicaly a monster movie with extra steps? llkkkk
Nature deals with matter at a 3d-spatial level in which every point (or part) of internal volume within the animal's body works in tandem with what we recognize as the external form of the fish, or rather, the outside surface of the fish's body, which is essentially a 2-D manifold embedded in what we consider a 3-D volume. The human mind deals with matter based largely on flat diagrams, or volumetric diagrams that have been unrolled onto a flat plane for visual identification. Because we only consider the outside form, all the gears and pullies and even the fixed components within the body of a robotic fish, while serving the function of producing a thrust by the flapping of a tail or fin, don't work together with the external form of the robot fish. For natural fish, both inside and outside bodily forms were developed in tandem over long-time. In a very real sense, the functional internal components of the robot fish conflict in many unforeseeable ways with the functions of the external form, such as flapping. The components of a fish's body will be even more difficult to replicate in a robot the more the living fish's center of gravity and general movement are informed by the *liquid* components of the fish's body, such as blood circulating with the fish's body. The physical characteristics of these innards are such that they include multiples states of matter (solid, liquid, gas) and mediate between them with varying degrees of softness and hardness within the fish's body (think "goo"). I imagine this could be overcome with math and AI basically, since these mediums are so abstract, and since their abstractness permits them to offer a vision of all 3-d Spatial points in tandem, as opposed to the limited manner in which human perception isolates shapes.
Alongside computational models, there is also trial and error, the evolutionary process occurring over deep-time. This must in some way be reflected in the scientific method, in which it is possible to simply produce many, many variations of a form and test them out to see which ones are best. The problem with this is you could end up stuck in a local maximum of functionality and never reach the global maximum of whichever function is desired, forward locomotion being the function in question here with the robot fish. Neural nets could be capable, alongside other black-box tools, of accounting for this wholistic interpretation of functionality, by producing and testing models much faster than what we see over deep time with the evolution of various fish.
"Anguilliform" > Anguille > French for eel. Also, interesting to learn that Science still uses the weirdly childish sounding plural of "Fish". Even more weird, we apparently claim it's for clarity when more than one species is present....as if that makes sense 🤷♂️ IMHO the only correct modern usage of "Fishes" is in Italian-American slang 😉 Great video as usual man. Thanks 🙏👍
None of these types of fish "propulsion" is as effective as ship screw. It's the same case like by planes. Jet turbines are similar to ship screws. There is only one rotational movement along longitudal axis. No cyclic acceleration and decelation like by fish's fins. The only parts that wear out are bearings. Easy to maintain, easy to construct, lightweight. I do not see big reason of using of fish-like propulsion.
Loiter by fish tank. Security will help connect you to owner. Its astonishing that the creator department didnt respond to your enquiry. Thats why I am suggesting a different sort of 'push' Another absorbing production. Thanks .
Do androids dream of electric fish? Not proper fishes but the jelly fish cuttle fish swimming technique where they use the longitudinal undulations thing but formed into a tube to create a water jet is the most efficient swimming technique. my bet is on the robotic jellyfish.
I'm sure if the engineers knew who you ARE, you would have the red carpet rolled out. Seriously, but not literally. Just freaking walk in with your 'business card' and you will get shuffled up the ladder
Nature documentaries are going to be insane if these things have cameras.
as the man himself mentioned, the problem is connectivity and energy/space/pressure/moisture-constraints..its hard, thats probably why we know so very much less about the ocean.. i wished i was able to study marine engineering, i always dreamed about working on subs... :)
Unfortunately, a lot is under water first documentaries are shot in aquariums
Still have seen documentaries with artificial fishs, crabs or octopus in German TV.
@@simonschneider5913 It can always just record it and send the data instead of it being streamed live.
@@kingkrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa4527 underwater datalinks are horrible. The most efficient ones probably sonar. Its a mess.
This channel has single handedly made me interested in IC's and lithography. Videos on these off topics are just a cherry on top.
Crazy to think how primitive all these robots are - the first ones are barely 30 years old and were made in the lifetime of most viewers. I imagine this is kind of what airplanes felt like in the 1920’s. If history is any guide, these aquatic drones are going to get A LOT better in the next 10-20 years.
As the First World War accelerated aircraft development, so the Ukraine war is accelerating drone development in the air and at sea. Future wars will contribute too. This will eventually result in improvements in civilian technology as with aviation post WW1 & 2. Interesting stuff.
All the best. 🐟
WWI saw many innovations, some of which spilled into peace-time, but human civilization will never be what it could have been were the World Wars averted. I know this sounds like a truism, but let me break it down further: It's simply impossible for us to recover ourselves, or imagine recovering ourselves, from something so titanically iniquitous as WORLD WAR, nor is it even possible to imagine a different outcome at this point. A climate of open-mindedness was emerging (at least in Europe) right before WWI that I fear we may never experience again as a species. There was an optimism at play at that point in history, culturally speaking, which would have been able to overcome all the vices we now associate with nihilism caused by constant warfare and maintenance of standing armies. The world would have continued to be multipolar, would have simply slowly moved away from colonialism. The concentration of power in the old nobility would have inevitably eroded, was already eroding, regardless of the World Wars, and even the human population might have grown at a slower rate, had there not been the threat and reality of so many of us dying in such a short amount of time due to not only conventional warfare, but nuclear warfare. Humanity lost about 100 million people due to these completely unnecessary wars, and several governments continue to argue that low birthrates are a threat threat to national security. I wish I could communicate what I mean. @@ivancho5854
@@josephyoung6749 Sadly everything you say is true.
I have been all over Europe and today in every single country I see the scars of the First and Second World Wars and the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe. The loss was unimaginable in scale and its impact continues.
My mother had to be dug out of her house as a child and it is by sheer luck that I am able to converse with you now. A quarter of the men in my family died in WW1.
Although they were not inevitable I think that biggest factor in Europe not continuing the pattern of the preceding centuries was the development of nuclear weapons, though that hasn't stopped war from returning to Europe in Ukraine. Unfortunately the devastation of cities there today is again unbelievable.
Go in peace my friend Joseph.
you might have just defined my career choices. wow. thats something!
when I was a kid, I used to go spear fishing in southern CA. One time I saw a large stingray in the sand. I tried to swim down to it and it vanished in blink of an eye. pacific stingray can go 30 mph :)
FESTOs AquaRay is much slower, but you have to check it out!
Veritaserum made a brilliant video about the insane competition in which hobbyists race robot mice automatically solving mazes, I'm convinced that there are people who would build better fish robots than all these scientists combined after having a competition like this for just a couple of years...
if the goal of the company is to make the fastest progress, they'd pay like a 100k prize pool.
Not sure how well you can absorb the findings like legally
"Fish efficiency" is probably the most satisfying expression I've heard in a few months. You never cease to amaze me. 8)
really cool to see the Asianometry deep dive on something small scale, although i love your stuff about chip fabs and industries.
The German word for guinea pigs translates to "sea pigs"
Lol this was literally my Master's thesis. Watching this video was like reading the background section of my thesis. I was looking at using piezo composites (called Macro Fibre Composites) as thrust producing fins. Cool stuff.
Finally finished watching the video and this video is nuts. good job
Robotic fish? The underwater drone warfare will be very interesting.
Cool, How about a deep dive on robots like you did for semiconductors: Unimation, Adept, Fanuc, Kawasaki, Abb, Kuka etc
Looking forward to Phish and Microchips 😂. Great video!
The start of the video was full-wholesome.
Growing biomechanical bodies with silicon brain or neural link control is the holy grail of robotics in my opinion.
Not what I was expecting from this channel. Superb. as usual.
Viktor Schauberger figured that vortex thing out as well. He even made proposals for flying crafts based on that principle.
can you poiint me to good references for schauberger, i am immensely interested in quality material about him. it seems unreal, but not quite too much to take it slighty serious. and the potential is amazing!
Bit cultish.
@@craigchamberlain1 only if you dont look into it! ...and that coming from a guy who is quick to discard anything resembling fancy bs theories without scientific rigour behind it.
There is something there. According to my own observations about flowing water, as well as all the documented phenomena displayed by HO2 and some other compounds that arent quite understood.
RoboPike - "Dead or alive, you are swimming with me." 😎
bro is on fire. the videos keep coming
This is what peak performance looks like!
Another banger video! Never knew there was so much about robot fish!
amazing topic! thank you so much for the video
I went to college with Jason, amazing to see how deep he has gone! I only did 1m and got out, it was obvious even at swimming he was a deep diver because of his metal skeleton! Proud of u big J!
Nice touch in the end
Ahh I see markdown written script (the header popped up in the caption). I see you're a man of culture :)
I study at Taipei Tech, I was really impressed when I saw this fish in the pool
At the 6:20 mark, I feel the vortices must both spin in the opposite direction for the fish to get a forward boost.
Search RUclips for 'how fish push vortexes'.
Numberphile video, computer simulation of fish, and more in the top results!
Enjoy. 👍😎🇦🇺
water goes back, fish goes forward.
@bubbasplants189 instead of vortices let us imagine a pair of vertical rollers like a car wash. If they roll as shown, the fish will be sucked backwards. The fish could push the centers of the vortices backwards while getting an extra push from the rotation in the direction of motion.
Imagine going fishing only to reel in one of these.
Looks like a fish, moves like a fish, steers like a cow
One of the best videos that you saw. Keep up with this kind of video instead of technology history
I'd be willing to bet a research team at a university does not have money to be throwing around at anyone, much less a naming consultant
Babe come home, new Asianometry dropped
Give it a few years and robot birds will be watching us
power to thrust ratio! a very sfc adjacent metric. (specific fuel consumption)
my personal favorite cursed units are lb/hr and lbf (pounds per hour fuel flow : pound-force), though not too relevant to underwater vehicles that can't burn fuel
HI Sutton's covert shores has a good article on watercraft using fish like porpulsion, there were Soviet vehicles with that design.
One of the oldest submarine concepts I ever heard about was one. called the "steinhuder hecht" (pike of lake steinhude), it was supposed to conect a fortress in the lake to it's allies, including portugal. Something supposedly was built in 1772, but i doubt it got too far. It's not really known, afaik.
Wiki article in english, german, spanish, italian:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steinhuder_Hecht
H I Sutton deserves so much more attention, he is a brilliant analyst. thanks for mentioning!
@@simonschneider5913yup, he's the go to guy for naval warfare especially if underwater.
@@nos9784wow, I did not know of that vehicle before. Thanks for sharing the link.
@@shaider1982 that why i had to compliment your idea to introduce him to this audience! :)
Great video, but missing the best finned robots around, from Pliant Energy Systems.
They swim beautifully but can also move over land, ice, etc. No other efforts come close!
Tentacles ➡️ barely controlled laughter
My favorite asianometry video
Awesome! you are into this too!
bro called the fish sensual
We are still a LONG way away from figuring out why certain things in nature work the way they do. The tuna and bumblebee laugh at our attemps to mimick their awesomeness!
see Viktor Schauberger. if only half of his story is true...theres an insane documentary from austria about him, water and its remarkable physics/chemistry...i cant remember the name, unfortunately.
It's 2023, computers can think, and submarines can swim. Eat that, Dijkstra!
bless your channel man never go into crazy ass production and annoying topics like The 8Bit Guy and Linus Tech Tips and MKBHD
for amiiform swimming check out the velox robot, it's somewhat of a mix between amiiform, gymnotiform and rajiform.
Another application would be to find low noise propulsion methods for submarines. Makes them harder to detect.
To be fair, it's basically impossible to evolve something like a propeller in nature, and they do work pretty well for providing 1-dimensional thrust while also being relatively easy to design and construct. Evolution is very good at optimizing a system, but it doesn't create *the* optimal system. Fitness has to improve or at least stay roughly the same in an evolutionary system, so it gets stuck in local-maxima in the absence of environmental changes. It's the same as the classic "why haven't animals have evolved wheels" question.
I could imagine a hybrid design being ideal instead, with a rear propeller for main thrust and fin-like structures on the sides, top, or bottom for maneuverability. There's no reason we can't have the best of all worlds.
I vaguely recall that nature has evolved a universal type joint which rotates under power at the microscopic level. Sorry that I can't remember more, I do know that when I read about it I was stunned at what I thought was impossible.
All the best.
Turns out it wasn't birds, it was fish that are government drones
They had a fish drive in Seaquest
truly, this is the pike of robotics engineering
I just started a masters at Taipei Tech a couple weeks ago! I'll try to figure out what team that is, sounds rad.
Fish? Feh, they need to swim like squid
Maybe in the future we'll have robotic documentaries disguised as nature documentaries about these robotic fishes.
stellar video as always, this type of design could revolutionize ocean travel.
amazing fish pictures my friend
These would be hard to detect in, say, the harbor of Sebastopol.
Dolphins are bone-lobed fish (Sarcopterygii).
In my opinion sarcopterygii is a clade defined by a common ancestor not a Paraphyly without tetrapods. A guy made some toxic comments so I had to clarify.
sea pig? That's so precious omg
couldn't they also be used for stealthy torpedos aimed at fixed targets like bridges?
Now you've got me interested! 😂
Slava Ukraine. 🇺🇦🇬🇧
Just keep swimming, just keep swimming
wouldn't this be an ideal application of machine learning to figure out how real tuna can 10x the speed of the robot?
OMG, it's a row-bot!
This is exactly was I was warning everyone about: robot sex fish.
If i can’t get tasty Sushi 🍣 from it I am not interested.
How else is a woman.... to get her daily supplement of iron.... ???
ISushi!!
So effectively everything in the sea is on the table;)
RIP all freshwater fish
Had shark meat (not fin) once in thailand it tasted terrible (putrid)
So, rhey ptobably already have underwater fish drones hunting for subs
What a fluid mechanics powerhouse Applied Maths at the University of Cambridge, UK was/is! As well as Michael Lighthill, featured here, there is Sir G.I. Taylor, who famously calculated the power of the first atom bomb from published photos and Sir George Bachelor, who studied turbulence, a horribly difficult subject.
this is the least shady thing DARPA has done lately.
though now i'm gonna have to add clunky fish roaming around surveilling the deep to the back of my mind forever
As soon as such a robot is capable to really swim like a tuna, all militaries will line up to purchase them en masse!
let's build a giant octopus kraken robot .
If the government can turn all birds into drones, I don't see why they should have any trouble doing it to the fish too. /s
3:07 We Vietnamese also compare dolphins to pigs.
Thank you once again. 👍
If straight out swimming speed is the goal, consider Istioform, or how sailfish swim. These things can hit 110 km/h, which is quite remarkable when you account for the much higher drag in water. Trevallies (carangiform) and tuna (thunniform) are no match.
A robot battery powered fish if designed properly could be able to recharge its own batteries by anchoring itself into a water current by its nose/mouth /rod connected to internal motor/generator while body spins around it.😮
Just a thought, putting it out there. 😮
I love inventions that use Nature & biological structures as their inspiration for their devices.
You may not like it, but this is what "pike" performance looks like.
Goddammit they took them fish jobs!
Bear wants robo-salmons ! 🐟
A fish’s effishiency 😂
Really awesome video...
I hope we can learn to copy some of that e-fish-ency 😋
3:07 吳 陸璣 《毛詩草木鳥獸蟲魚疏》：「《魚服》，魚獸之皮也。魚獸似豬，東海有之，一名『魚貍。』其 皮背上斑文，腹下純青，今以為弓鞬步叉者也。」
《山海經》郭璞注曰：「今海中有海狶，體如魚，頭似豬。」
Why no mentiom of the robot dolphins from edge innovations?
Other than that great video as always😅
crazy to think the idea of needing to engenier robots that are able to respond to predators, like, isnt it basicaly a monster movie with extra steps? llkkkk
Nature deals with matter at a 3d-spatial level in which every point (or part) of internal volume within the animal's body works in tandem with what we recognize as the external form of the fish, or rather, the outside surface of the fish's body, which is essentially a 2-D manifold embedded in what we consider a 3-D volume. The human mind deals with matter based largely on flat diagrams, or volumetric diagrams that have been unrolled onto a flat plane for visual identification.
Because we only consider the outside form, all the gears and pullies and even the fixed components within the body of a robotic fish, while serving the function of producing a thrust by the flapping of a tail or fin, don't work together with the external form of the robot fish. For natural fish, both inside and outside bodily forms were developed in tandem over long-time. In a very real sense, the functional internal components of the robot fish conflict in many unforeseeable ways with the functions of the external form, such as flapping.
The components of a fish's body will be even more difficult to replicate in a robot the more the living fish's center of gravity and general movement are informed by the *liquid* components of the fish's body, such as blood circulating with the fish's body. The physical characteristics of these innards are such that they include multiples states of matter (solid, liquid, gas) and mediate between them with varying degrees of softness and hardness within the fish's body (think "goo"). I imagine this could be overcome with math and AI basically, since these mediums are so abstract, and since their abstractness permits them to offer a vision of all 3-d Spatial points in tandem, as opposed to the limited manner in which human perception isolates shapes.
Alongside computational models, there is also trial and error, the evolutionary process occurring over deep-time. This must in some way be reflected in the scientific method, in which it is possible to simply produce many, many variations of a form and test them out to see which ones are best. The problem with this is you could end up stuck in a local maximum of functionality and never reach the global maximum of whichever function is desired, forward locomotion being the function in question here with the robot fish. Neural nets could be capable, alongside other black-box tools, of accounting for this wholistic interpretation of functionality, by producing and testing models much faster than what we see over deep time with the evolution of various fish.
Fishy business
When are we getting fish robots to explore Europa???
One fish two fish three fish there is no such thing as "fishes"!
This has military applications... I'm guessing that's why no one is getting back to you yet
"Anguilliform" > Anguille > French for eel. Also, interesting to learn that Science still uses the weirdly childish sounding plural of "Fish". Even more weird, we apparently claim it's for clarity when more than one species is present....as if that makes sense 🤷♂️ IMHO the only correct modern usage of "Fishes" is in Italian-American slang 😉
Great video as usual man. Thanks 🙏👍
A video topic suggestion: The SEED encryption algorithm and past dominance of Microsoft Internet Explorer in South Korea because of it.
None of these types of fish "propulsion" is as effective as ship screw. It's the same case like by planes. Jet turbines are similar to ship screws. There is only one rotational movement along longitudal axis. No cyclic acceleration and decelation like by fish's fins. The only parts that wear out are bearings. Easy to maintain, easy to construct, lightweight. I do not see big reason of using of fish-like propulsion.
Coil memory 4 eels will work
04:13 what a stankface 😂
Robots that swim like fish
new bomb design
Great video :)
How was this comment posted 2 months ago?
@@gawainthedane3314 Patreon early post
@@gawainthedane3314 Patreon early access, as usual.
Loiter by fish tank. Security will help connect you to owner.
Its astonishing that the creator department didnt respond to your enquiry. Thats why I am suggesting a different sort of 'push'
Another absorbing production. Thanks .
GREAT VIDEO IDEA very interested in this video personally keep up the great work !!!
Do androids dream of electric fish?
Not proper fishes but the jelly fish cuttle fish swimming technique where they use the longitudinal undulations thing but formed into a tube to create a water jet is the most efficient swimming technique. my bet is on the robotic jellyfish.
I'm sure if the engineers knew who you ARE, you would have the red carpet rolled out. Seriously, but not literally. Just freaking walk in with your 'business card' and you will get shuffled up the ladder