You Laugh, You Integrate... [ feat.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
  • Still looking for the perfect Christmas present? :0 Check out www.ridge.com/... to get 10% off your WHOLE order + FREE worldwide shipping! =)
    10-15% Off all my Merch :) Use Code 42069 over on papaflammy.myt...
    10% Off ALL Newton's Cradles! =D stemerch.com/
    You Laugh, You Differentiate: • You Laugh You Differen...
    You Laugh, You Maths: • You Laugh, You Math......
    You Laugh, You Physics: • You Laugh You Physics ...
    Advent Calendar Playlist: • Advent Calendar 2020
    Skit Playlist: • Skits
    Integral PDF: www.researchga...
    Today we play you laugh, you integrate! :D If you laugh, you have to integrate notational garbage, what a fun! :D Video sponsored by The Ridge btw! =D
    Help me create more free content! =)
    stemerch.com/
    / mathable
    papaflammy.myt...
    Merch :v - papaflammy.myt...
    www.amazon.com...
    shop.spreadshi...
    Become a Member of the Flammily! :0 / @papaflammy69
    2nd Channel: / @npcooking69
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Wanna send me some stuff? lel:
    Postfach 11 15
    06731 Bitterfeld-Wolfen
    Saxony-Anhalt
    Germany
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Twitter: / flammablemaths
    Instagram: / uncomfortably_cursed_m...
    Flammy's subreddit: / flammybois
    Facebook: / flammablemaths
    Want to know more about me? Watch my QnA! =D • Question and Answer Ti...

Комментарии • 630

  • @flowerwithamachinegun2692
    @flowerwithamachinegun2692 3 года назад +2137

    "Everything is convergent if you're brave enough"
    I'm definitely taking this attitude to my next calc exam

    • @ammyvl1
      @ammyvl1 3 года назад +105

      No don't

    • @sigmundfreud4472
      @sigmundfreud4472 3 года назад +62

      I dare you to use the Riemann series theorem (or whatever it’s called) and just rearrange terms to show every divergent series converges to 69. ;)

    • @khaledchatah3425
      @khaledchatah3425 3 года назад

      ikr

    • @Krishnajha20101
      @Krishnajha20101 2 года назад +2

      @@sigmundfreud4472 Nice. And username definitely checks out.

    • @Wabbelpaddel
      @Wabbelpaddel 2 года назад +6

      Your prof be like: "Everything is a failed exam if you're brave enough"

  • @SV-yo6nq
    @SV-yo6nq 3 года назад +1015

    "-420 is approximately zero"
    "yeah for small values of 420"
    lmfao

    • @Smitology
      @Smitology 3 года назад +8

      No I missed the moment this comment reached 420 likes

    • @lukejames3039
      @lukejames3039 2 года назад +43

      @@Smitology it still is at 420 for large values of 420

  • @integralboi2900
    @integralboi2900 3 года назад +2369

    Andrew’s integration skills make me feel smarter

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos 3 года назад +894

      If there's only one thing I know it's that \int lnx = 1/x

    • @PapaFlammy69
      @PapaFlammy69  3 года назад +266

      @@AndrewDotsonvideos xDDD

    • @integralboi2900
      @integralboi2900 3 года назад +43

      Andrew replied ^_^

    • @thephysicistcuber175
      @thephysicistcuber175 3 года назад +38

      Are we not talking about flammy just being a dumbo with d^2/(d^2+1)?

    • @user-en5vj6vr2u
      @user-en5vj6vr2u 3 года назад +25

      @@thephysicistcuber175 they were both clowns the entire video

  • @lourencoentrudo
    @lourencoentrudo 3 года назад +444

    Clever memes:
    Flammable Math:
    "Your sister could be dead":
    Flammable Math: LMAO DEAD SISTER

  • @davidberardo93
    @davidberardo93 3 года назад +1027

    I never knew I needed competitive meme integral solving, but I need it

  • @luisantoniogarcia9894
    @luisantoniogarcia9894 3 года назад +194

    "Anything is convergent is you're brave enough"
    I try to live my life by that marvelous phrase

    • @YaamFel
      @YaamFel 3 года назад +12

      Spoken like a true physicist

  • @josedavid8903
    @josedavid8903 3 года назад +337

    There is nothing better than trying to solve integrals while a german guy laughs at you, it is definitely as good as it gets...

  • @aryandwivedi4875
    @aryandwivedi4875 3 года назад +467

    Please keep this series alive haven't laughed this much in a while. Really keep this series going ahead.

  • @professionalprocrastinator8103
    @professionalprocrastinator8103 3 года назад +128

    Andrew: *breathes*
    Jens: "Haha you laughed!!!"

  • @6900xx
    @6900xx 3 года назад +308

    12:07 "proof by knowing what the answer is" lmao 😂😂😂

    • @lior_shiboli
      @lior_shiboli 3 года назад +12

      7th grade me wished i could have used it

  • @Naliathan
    @Naliathan 3 года назад +47

    I'm so happy that I'm not only who forgets if int ln x = 1/x or int 1/x =ln x

  • @arsenmingo62
    @arsenmingo62 3 года назад +509

    Dude, the last one's trivial. e = pi, so the integaral evaluates to zero.

    • @tomatenbomber8830
      @tomatenbomber8830 3 года назад +23

      they are making that joke in the video sir

    • @plainText384
      @plainText384 3 года назад +23

      When you realise that he could have just drawn some triangles to find the area under f(x) = x

  • @apk2626
    @apk2626 3 года назад +179

    If this is the level of humor you acquire when doing maths then I'm never stopping doing it.

    • @PapaFlammy69
      @PapaFlammy69  3 года назад +15

      :D

    • @catlavettosic825
      @catlavettosic825 3 года назад +8

      It does come with some problems...like trying to convince anyone other than other mathematicians that you are sane.

  • @roshanakadorabarrett562
    @roshanakadorabarrett562 3 года назад +74

    Andrew’s integration skills are making me wish that I stayed in my mathematical career.

  • @alexanderjordan9894
    @alexanderjordan9894 3 года назад +14

    "Reading the rest of the meme is left as an exercise for the viewer" killed me

  • @williamschmidt-hansen6311
    @williamschmidt-hansen6311 3 года назад +189

    "Whalecum to another video" 😂

  • @igormodesto3123
    @igormodesto3123 3 года назад +17

    "good morning fellow mathematicians, welcbaktnuda veedio"
    accurate

  • @ayushsambher920
    @ayushsambher920 2 года назад +15

    19:22 You could have done +1 - 1 in the numerator and split the fraction
    It will become Integral of [1 - 1/(d²+1)]
    So that will be d - (arc tan d) + D

  • @someoneuppingdudetechnical6320
    @someoneuppingdudetechnical6320 3 года назад +61

    Andrew laughs while internally dying at 9:28 after being reminded of massive American college debt oof.
    I hope for him that it's not that bad

  • @clubstepdj
    @clubstepdj 3 года назад +76

    For the last one i used the "area method" since x is a simple function and the shape of area is just a trapezium
    = (f(π) + f(e))(π - e) / 2
    = (π + e)(π - e)/2
    = (π² - e²)/2
    = π²/2 - e²/2

  • @maclambert2932
    @maclambert2932 3 года назад +120

    Jens: Good morning fellow mathematicians
    Me (A mechanical engineering major): *Nervous sweating*

  • @rishabhscodes
    @rishabhscodes 3 года назад +53

    "Everything converges if you wait long enough" ~ Andrew Dotson.

  • @imagzz4942
    @imagzz4942 3 года назад +37

    Favorite quote of the video: "Proof by knowing the answer".
    xd

    • @darkfinal9964
      @darkfinal9964 3 года назад +1

      Me, an Aerospace engineer student: "Mhh, I see nothing wrong here."

  • @terezazuskinova2926
    @terezazuskinova2926 3 года назад +8

    Definitely doing this with my friend as a preparation for our upcoming calculus exam! 😂❤️great inspiration

    • @stuffz4040
      @stuffz4040 3 года назад +2

      Dude that is a brilliant study strategy for many classes, now I just need friends

  • @xtremeblaze777
    @xtremeblaze777 3 года назад +131

    Nobody:
    Not even Americans:
    Jens: "Hee"

  • @machine4971
    @machine4971 3 года назад +15

    I put the first integral into wolfram alpha and it told me “no result found in terms of standard mathematical functions”... holy hell

    • @knvids2812
      @knvids2812 Год назад

      New result didn’t drop

  • @klaus9107
    @klaus9107 3 года назад +44

    OMG Papa Jens, I think you made a mistake! Are you sure about interchanging the limit and the integral at 8:20? The evaluated integral does not depend on ∂ anymore, so the answer would be something with Si(x) because you could ignore the limit.
    The way you are doing it, you should include the d∂ in the limit, but then the integral would not make any sense.

    • @gdsfish3214
      @gdsfish3214 3 года назад +12

      Whatever he did there was definitely not correct lol. Since the integral from 42 to 111 is already a constant which does not depend on the variable, the limit would just be the constant. So the actual value of this limit would then be approximately -0.0054 according to wolfram alpha.

    • @Ricocossa1
      @Ricocossa1 3 года назад +3

      The notation was ambiguous to start with, so one could argue that the ∂ appearing in the integrand is not the one from the integral, but the one from the limit. XD

    • @poutineausyropderable7108
      @poutineausyropderable7108 3 года назад

      It's like taking the limit as x-> 0 or 6.

    • @poutineausyropderable7108
      @poutineausyropderable7108 3 года назад

      @@adamjennifer6437 Fucking bot.

  • @timhaigis1087
    @timhaigis1087 3 года назад +25

    For small values of 420 it is approximately 0...
    Seems legit

  • @randymi9334
    @randymi9334 3 года назад +162

    Andrew is proof you don't need calculus to do physics

    • @takeuchi5760
      @takeuchi5760 2 года назад +15

      I mean he was probably rusty on integration or something, cuz you can go a long time without encountering serious integration while doing physics.
      But when you are solving real problems, you better know integration.

    • @leoman5481
      @leoman5481 2 года назад +5

      @@takeuchi5760 you can study maths and go a long time with out integration

    • @createyourownfuture5410
      @createyourownfuture5410 2 года назад +2

      @@leoman5481 Yes except that the connection of branches in mathematics is just a mess, like for some reason the zeta function which is defined in the complex numbers gives information about the distribution of primes, which is dealt with in number theory. You just cannot say that you will never encounter integrals if you are a professional in other branches of mathematics.

  • @HormersdorfLP
    @HormersdorfLP 3 года назад +24

    Integrate x dx. Everyone: it's x^2/2...
    Him: let's substitute bs here and use e^some more bs.

  • @physicsforever4793
    @physicsforever4793 3 года назад +125

    28:43
    "Eins... Epstein's theory of heat capacity"
    Wtf!?!?!

    • @MrFram
      @MrFram 3 года назад +29

      daily reminder that heat capacity didn't kill itself

    • @Exachad
      @Exachad 3 года назад +2

      Andrew killed Epstein

  • @nyxalmagest7226
    @nyxalmagest7226 3 года назад +26

    This is absolutely amazing! as someone who enjoys integrating but doesn't love it, it was an amazing way of practicing, I paused and solved each integral with you guys! Although it began as procrastination I ended up practicing!!! And my exam is in 3 weeks!! Thanks!

  • @lainer4708
    @lainer4708 3 года назад +45

    Engineers: Where's the table??

    • @HormersdorfLP
      @HormersdorfLP 3 года назад +17

      Honestly true. I thought. These techniques and what the heck is a sec^2. That's gotta be in a table. Otherwise I am lost. I call it proof by someone elses work

    • @jeangtech1830
      @jeangtech1830 3 года назад

      @@HormersdorfLP LMFAO

  • @RC32Smiths01
    @RC32Smiths01 3 года назад +3

    Dude, a great collaboration! Awesome to see you guys at it again!

  • @mrstruggle2846
    @mrstruggle2846 3 года назад +1

    For the d^2/d^2+1, you could add 1 and subtract 1 in the numerator, so (d^2+1-1), then split into 1-(1/d^2+1) which integrates into d-arctan(d)+C

  • @itratabbas7669
    @itratabbas7669 3 года назад +229

    NOTICE ME PAPA FLAMMY

  • @fahyaz3643
    @fahyaz3643 3 года назад +42

    Just sayin', but you could've just rewritten it like this instead;
    (d²+1)/(d²+1) - 1/(1+d²)
    and avoided all that monstrosity lmao.

  • @mitchellsolano1631
    @mitchellsolano1631 3 года назад +25

    "Everything converges if you wait long enough." Spoken like a true physicist Andrew.

  • @alvaroballon7133
    @alvaroballon7133 3 года назад +33

    Please don’t learn how to integrate from these guys XD

    • @stuffz4040
      @stuffz4040 3 года назад +2

      Just not from this video

    • @adriencastella4992
      @adriencastella4992 3 года назад +2

      Yeah they do some very stupid shit lol

    • @adriencastella4992
      @adriencastella4992 3 года назад

      Flammable maths interchanging the limit and the integral sign when the resulting integral is independent of the limit to end up with a complete nonsense result...

  • @1996Pinocchio
    @1996Pinocchio 3 года назад +20

    You could've let the memes away and just solve stupid integrals lol

  • @liljuice2357
    @liljuice2357 3 года назад +9

    Me: solves one simple integral in high school
    Also me: „You lough, you integrate“

  • @RozarSmacco
    @RozarSmacco 3 года назад

    The first integral is Coxeter’s integral. In Nahin’s Inside Interesting Integrals it was THE single, longest evaluation in the book.

  • @felixmende2693
    @felixmende2693 3 года назад +55

    Is one a nerd if one finds this genuinely entertaining?

  • @Ganerrr
    @Ganerrr 2 года назад +10

    "python can't do things like 420^71"
    ah, you appear to have forgot about one of python's coolest features, unbounded sized ints!

  • @jony27003
    @jony27003 3 года назад +6

    Literally laughed my ass off for nearly the entire video 🤣

  • @andrewshattock8289
    @andrewshattock8289 3 года назад +17

    Does anybody else watch his videos even tho you have no idea what he is talking about?

  • @ammyvl1
    @ammyvl1 3 года назад +37

    you could've just had him come upstairs instead of overlaying the videos

  • @koelsche_falafel
    @koelsche_falafel 2 года назад +1

    honestly, I was laughing more about how you calculated the integrals in Dotson manner, than about the memes :D

  • @shubhankursuvansh3279
    @shubhankursuvansh3279 3 года назад +7

    And I thought I was the only physics student who fucked up integral and differential of log!
    My shame has been vanquished. Thank you Andrew and thank you Flammy!

  • @Andr_ss
    @Andr_ss 3 года назад +1

    31:00 since pi = e = 3, then the result is 0 since we integrating from 3 to 3

  • @noahmunz3201
    @noahmunz3201 3 года назад +1

    Whenever I have doubt about my integrations skills watching Flammy's "hard integration" videos, I watch this.
    Then, I feel instantly better about my skills lmao

  • @supersonicstyleatsonicspeed
    @supersonicstyleatsonicspeed 3 года назад +1

    Mother 1/Earthbound Begginingsmusic. Hell Yeah!

  • @antaresguitar
    @antaresguitar 3 года назад

    Absolutely awesome!

  • @ty6339
    @ty6339 3 года назад +1

    I think u should extend your Wortschatz of variable names by integrating symbols from other areas of maths like group, category and set theory. Then you will be unstoppable.

  • @markosth09
    @markosth09 10 месяцев назад +1

    8:24 you can't interchange the limit and the integral, instead you have to use the sine integral function Si(x)=int 0..x sin(x)/x. lim x->0 [int 42..111 sin(x)/x dx]=lim x->0 Si(111)-Si(42)=Si(111)-Si(42)≈-0.00543373

  • @Rancor9000
    @Rancor9000 3 года назад

    Love the Forest Haven music in the background.

  • @DavidChristmas
    @DavidChristmas 3 года назад +3

    24:40 integaral

  • @Taokyle
    @Taokyle 10 месяцев назад +2

    Came for the memes, stayed for the math

  • @ronakbhaaya
    @ronakbhaaya 3 года назад +1

    22:05 take (d² + 1 = t) then differentiate it. (d.d(d) = dt/2). Now just replace the values in integral and you've an ans. [ln(√(d²+1))].

  • @isaacjohnson8752
    @isaacjohnson8752 2 года назад

    The solution to integral 3 was super cool!

  • @SlipperyTeeth
    @SlipperyTeeth 3 года назад +39

    8:35 You can't interchange the limit. As written, you are asking for the limit of a constant number, so for example you could replace that limit with one approaching 72 and your answer shouldn't change. But by interchanging, you are taking the integral of a constant, and this constant does depend on the value the limit is approaching, but that wouldn't be the case if you were free to interchange them through the integral.
    You are playing too loose with dummy variables. The definition of the definite integral requires that its dummy variable be free to vary throughout its region of integration. When pulled inside, the limit that uses the same dummy variable places an additional restriction on the dummy variable that breaks the original definition of the definite integral.

    • @genie9845
      @genie9845 3 года назад

      My thoughts exactly, the area function limit might differ for the general case

    • @Ryan-gq2ji
      @Ryan-gq2ji 3 года назад +3

      Yeah, that integral didn't make too sense honestly. Letting a variable approach a constant but also integrating with respect to the same variable? Doesn't really make sense honestly

  • @1996Pinocchio
    @1996Pinocchio 3 года назад +9

    Joke's on you, papa flammy. Python can calculate arbitrary large numbers, including 420^71.

  • @raghav9o9
    @raghav9o9 3 года назад +10

    19:44 that is the easiest integral of the whole video just +1 and -1 in the numerator and then separate the denominator, thus then you have to Integrate dd and -1/d^2+1 dd so the answer is d - tan^-1(d).

  • @dhoyt902
    @dhoyt902 3 года назад +1

    Hey FM, this is one of the best formats you have presented. You can def. milk this cow.

    • @PapaFlammy69
      @PapaFlammy69  3 года назад

      But it's soooooooooooooo much editing XD

  • @corydiehl764
    @corydiehl764 3 года назад

    Integral at 20:00 is really easy. Just add 0=+1-1 to the numerator, and then it's trivial

  • @TheGrimravager
    @TheGrimravager 3 года назад

    this stuff reminds me of my time doing personal tutoring, amazing :D

  • @srinikethvelivela9877
    @srinikethvelivela9877 3 года назад +33

    Hello there

    • @PapaFlammy69
      @PapaFlammy69  3 года назад +6

      Hey :D

    • @backyardcreeper
      @backyardcreeper 3 года назад +21

      General Kenobi

    • @kaedo-2740
      @kaedo-2740 3 года назад +3

      @@backyardcreeper this is the right answer

    • @ebertschaguilar
      @ebertschaguilar 3 года назад +1

      General Kenobi

    • @throwawayuser9931
      @throwawayuser9931 3 года назад +5

      I have been trained in your Jedi arts by Count Dooku...
      Proceeds to do the most unDooku thing possible....

  • @SartajKhan-jg3nz
    @SartajKhan-jg3nz 3 года назад +3

    You can see Andrew's agony in his face...that pain...

  • @samfrank3999
    @samfrank3999 3 года назад

    19:50 use long division. d^2/d^2+1=1-1/(1+d^2) which is trivial

  • @ezequielghienaramos4777
    @ezequielghienaramos4777 3 года назад

    In the dd one, you could have added and subtracted 1 on the numerator so you have 1-1/(d^2+1) in the integrand getting d-arctan(d) easier.. But I loved your struggle with the d's so I'm not even mad

  • @sergiocanoalhambra1794
    @sergiocanoalhambra1794 2 года назад +1

    The d^2/(d^2+1) would have been easier if you divided the polinome getting 1-1/(d^2+1)

  • @jessec4094
    @jessec4094 3 года назад +10

    “Take a deep breath such that you don’t laugh”

  • @MathIguess
    @MathIguess 2 года назад +1

    I've been using the same wallet since grade 6 lol

  • @LiamInviteMelonTeee
    @LiamInviteMelonTeee 3 года назад +29

    Number 9: just write d^2 +1 -1 kid flammy 19:20

    • @xD-jm2ie
      @xD-jm2ie 3 года назад +1

      Was gonna say... simplifies to d-(1/d^2+1) which are both standard integrals...

    • @tupoiu
      @tupoiu 3 года назад

      u still need tan substitution to integrate 1/(d^2+1)

    • @ethanbottomley-mason8447
      @ethanbottomley-mason8447 3 года назад +7

      @@tupoiu Not if you just say it is tan^-1 and leave the proof as an exercise for the reader.

    • @xD-jm2ie
      @xD-jm2ie 3 года назад +1

      As I was saying, standard integral

  • @dominictam3568
    @dominictam3568 3 года назад

    For the last integral, I would of used the graph to approach it visually and calculate the trapezoid using (upper base+lower base)*height/2 area formula

  • @leonardobaraviera1759
    @leonardobaraviera1759 3 года назад +3

    What about that arccos(f(t)) integral? How to solve that? It's in 4:31...

  • @arturoordonez-hernandez1534
    @arturoordonez-hernandez1534 3 года назад +1

    The anti-antiderivative of ln(x) is 1/x

  • @mikoajmackowiak6993
    @mikoajmackowiak6993 3 года назад

    You uploaded this faster, nice.

  • @jorge_cazares
    @jorge_cazares 3 года назад +4

    thE inTegral oF lOg(x) iZ 1/X 11:18

  • @rockcandy41145
    @rockcandy41145 3 года назад

    Please make more of these

  • @colinperry499
    @colinperry499 3 года назад +3

    The pikmin music got me

  • @user-jn4qk3qi4g
    @user-jn4qk3qi4g 3 года назад +1

    At 23:00, why didn’t he just add one to the numerator and subtract 1/(1+d^2), then you get 1 - 1/(d^2+1), which is d - arctan(d).
    Great vid tho!

  • @roccobrando4816
    @roccobrando4816 3 года назад

    This is a useful and instructive video contemporary! :)

  • @frozenmoon998
    @frozenmoon998 3 года назад +2

    Now we know who is superior at integharals, that is, but the differential boii still is in the basement :D

  • @finnos3400
    @finnos3400 3 года назад

    For number 3 you could have used integration by parts with u=x,dv=dx.

  • @gooseart2222
    @gooseart2222 3 года назад +6

    What an astonishing video, I should be studying, but YLYI is much better. Thank you for the entertainment.

  • @rustprogrammer
    @rustprogrammer 3 года назад

    this is the best video on the internet

  • @T3WI
    @T3WI 3 года назад

    Oh my god I need more

  • @navoditkapoor122
    @navoditkapoor122 3 года назад

    Worse than you laugh you loose😂

  • @arnau7915
    @arnau7915 3 года назад +6

    Jens and Andrew: *struggle when using common letters as variables*
    Greeks: First time?

  • @STING-AH
    @STING-AH 2 года назад

    Well watching this makes feel less dumb

  • @sone4273
    @sone4273 2 года назад +2

    Don't worry about some mistakes, it's just like Grandmasters blunders in Chess.

  • @vineetjain3172
    @vineetjain3172 2 года назад

    Hello Papa Flammy is the answer to the first question zero. I do it by substitution and integration by parts.

  • @WoWSchockadin
    @WoWSchockadin 3 года назад

    Papa not seeing, that f(chi) = chi is just a straight line, so integrating over any intervall [a;b] will be 1/2 * (a+b)(a-b) [using the area of a trapezium]

  • @NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself
    @NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself 3 года назад

    A great play along at home game!

  • @thomasstokes9412
    @thomasstokes9412 3 года назад +4

    @ 8:24 You can't interchange the limit and the integral in this case because the limit is respect the variable you are also integrating. If you work it out then you find that the answer is approximately -0.00543 (\int_42^111 sin(x)/x dx).

  • @atomspalter2090
    @atomspalter2090 3 года назад +1

    i was like number 3333 oooh

  • @sarujanrupan4831
    @sarujanrupan4831 3 года назад

    20:58 When a physicist beats a mathematician...

  • @aurkom
    @aurkom 3 года назад

    4:23 Engineer move ; )

  • @stevesastrohowardkings2245
    @stevesastrohowardkings2245 3 года назад

    Favorite cover photo enhance my joy
    Of laughter joy !