It’s amazing how good this lawyer is. Every video I see, he picks out on the spot the moments and elements of the incident that are most significant and damning to the states case and just absolutely embarrasses the cops time after time after time
Yes ...I've tried it sober, 15 years sober. Many times I tried, can't do it. Most of us after a certain age have injuries, arthritis, can't see, can't hear lol. 😊
Similarly I was going to say they must be asked "how often do these test produce false positives?" If they cant answer that then they CANT know how reliable the tests are. IOW in addition to you perfectly sensible idea that you cant know if this SPECIFIC person performed poorly if you have not seen hem perform sober, But also you cant know how well the performed if you don't know how the population at large performs
@@chasethecat3839 yep I say the officer should have to do the full test for the jury and judge to show them how sober people do them just think they would have practiced it and probably fail
Sadly, I have tried it once and it backfired. The cop said a sober person, based on the field studies done by NHTSA, would would exhibit fewer clues than an intoxicated person. Although in practice, your answer is spot on, some cops have this standard embedded in their brain. Even without it, it gives the officer too much wiggle room on cross examination, so I would avoid that question in court, unless you have your own expert to counter what the officer is saying.
when a cop says im drunk and tells me i HAVE to do their dog and pony show i say NOPE give me a breath test i am NOT here for your amusement and when a cop says my name is officer jones or sergeant jones or chief of police jones from the point where they say that i then refer to them as employee jones i will say the same thing to a senator or congressman. they all seem to have forgotten WHO they work for. they ARE our employees until we break the law!
I agree with you, but not fully. First, I would never refer to someone as "employee [name]", that's just disrespectful. If you want to do that from the start, that's up to you, but you're choosing to start an interaction with someone disrespectfully. Second, we vote Senators/Congressmen and other specified positions into office, as outlined by law and the constitution. Officers of the law for example are not voted upon positions, therefore they really don't work for you, but for the hierarchal body that you generally voted for to create/manage these types of systems. Referring to any Officer as "employee" again would just be disrespectful, that's like referring to any judge as "employee" rather than "your honor", they would not appreciate that and your court case would likely be a rough case. Third, who the people voted into office work for are the collective people that voted them in, not just any one person. For example, the Senator for your state represents your entire state, not just you. The representative for you in congress represents your entire district, not just you. While generally they should account for complaints and take those into consideration, there's more to it than just you. I otherwise fully agree with you, if you know you had not drank anything the whole day and an officer accuses of otherwise, I'd go straight to a breath test as well. At that point, it's just an improper stop and the officer has no other reason to investigate further once his or her original suspicions are no longer valid.
They serve and swear and oath to the Corporation that America was put under, not We the people, yet we pay their salaries, benefits and pay for any settlements from lawsuits. How's that grab ya? Grabs me right in the ba__s and purse strings and passes me off
i’m kind of lost here. I watched the whole video to the end and all I saw was him asking about the difference between September 23 and September 26. There was no end to the case nothing was said the video just ended. Did he win or lose this case? I don’t understand!
@@Jpassione58 don't know the outcome either, but what the officer said on the stand did not take away from his testimony, my guess is the guy was found guilty.
I've tried doing the balance tests completely sober and on my own with no pressure and failed them, there's no way i could do them on the road in the cold at night with an arrest threatening me.
Well, unopened bottles of alcohol aren’t illegal to carry. The opened empty bottles could have been drunk previously, and he put the trash in his vehicle. No way to tell when the bottles were opened and consumed.
It is incomprehensible to me that a US police officer is allowed to take a medical sobriety test and that this is even recognized in court. As far as eyes are concerned, there are so many factors that a non-medical person can hardly tell the difference. Especially if you wave a flashlight in front of your face in the dark. These tests should be abolished for cops.
Cops always testify FST’s are voluntary but they don’t pretend them to be in the field in most cases. Never do them in the field especially if you have consumed alcohol. If you have not consumed alcohol I would opt for a blood test if they offer that option as FST’s are very faulty and left to interpretation by sometimes poorly trained cops. Even the breathalyzers are faulty and can give a false positive reading. If you are DWI over the limit, you are going to lose your license anyway in most cases.The only difference is you aren’t helping the cop build a case against you by refusing FST’s, the best thing is to not drink and drive.
each state has few game wardens...he must of thought he had a door open then found..nope that door closed so off to be a cop...GW have a hell of a lot of power..I was talking to one days ago about laws in Ohio and wildlife
I had different addresses of 2 different places on my ticket. They had the year make and model of my bike wrong and no video. Wanted to take it to trial and still got a reckless
AMEN!! Cops are in Desperate Need of EDUCATION about the history of policing and what our LAWS ARE!! They should know AT LEAST as much as we citizens do!!!!🤦🏼♀️🇺🇸🦾
All that money and effort spent getting a degree in forestry…..and he’s a patrol officer working 3rd shift 8 years later. I question that officer’s judgement.
@@veithkilbert4253Depends on how the town manager or Chief, Sheriff wants it. I've talked to a bunch of em and it's pretty much discretion of whomever is making the rules, so to speak.
I looked up the salaries, pretty much same starting to top 10%. 40-47k and 46-56k top top 10, 70-76k. Google it, there's a lot of this and that to determine.
A one legged man would fail because he had one foot continuously on the ground. LEO dismiss any disability that would affect the outcome of the "tests."
Should really show the verdict at the end of all of this, sometimes the courts still find in the officers favour even after they've been proven to be making up stuff.
This is a perfect example of why you record all police. This cop said he has no body cam or car cam. If you have camera evidence to present in court and he has none, it's his word against your video proof. He loses every time. They should lose if it's his word against ours.
They know it, they just don't care to follow it because they don't have to. And if you as a citizen try to express your rights that just pisses them off even more.
LEO are trained …. to find evidence to use against civilians lawful police are few and far between…. lawful means serving the people that employ them ( us citizens) and protecting the rights of same people AND UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION well tyrants with badges in third word countries they copy they serve themselves !!! revel in mistreating civilians - LEO and their families speed , are immune to law breaking again it use to be they served us they protected us they are REVENUE DRIVEN egotistical tyrants bullying citizens not all are revenue driven but they mostly are revenue they need to get their shiny toys
I could never convidt on police testimony alone since they are permitted to lie and that alone always brings "reasonable doubt "besides how can a career liar possibly have any credibility in court?
Police are allowed to lie in questioning during an Interrogation NOT sworn in on the stand in court. That's the whole raise your right hand bit they do at the beginning when they take the stand. Do some lie on the stand? Oh I'm sure. But they're not permitted to.
@@bombcherryjuice2000 SO it all falls apart because of a date being written wrong on an additional page? All I got from this is lawyers are slimy jerks!
@@TheChrisPineWorkshop the same thing was done at Idaho 4 case, the detective wrote " knife was placed beside victim on bed, later it was written knife was found under the blanket partially visible beside victim, so the detective wrote what he did, same as this dui officer done when he changed the paper or added to it but he Fd up with the date....LE is not your friend they are licensed liars and killers with QI
@@retiredhockeymom2662yet they never seem to have a problem finding funding for weapons and tactical vehicles that would rival that of some small nations armies.
@@PntsOnTheGround I feel like the courts should be able to be held liable for this. I know that my job immediately picked up the required technology to work remotely and we didn't miss a beat. We strangely become statistically more productive during that time period. The courts should have been able to do the same thing.
@thenightingale7405 yep! I work for a nonprofit with very limited funding, and we were working virtually 5 days after the government took away our rights. The judicial system should've been on the ball a lot faster than most other businesses and companies.
Well, u know, Covid. No one worked. The IRS is 2 years behind now and our local DSSis JUST now telling employees, they can no longer work from home every one I know that works for the government, working from home, has had a 4 year vacation- paid well for it and the best health insurance ever. Hmmm.
Why the heck are police using MILITARY TIME?? And military titles!! Creepy and kind of disgusting! Just like their dress-up gear. It’s like stolen valor!!!
What 😂 it just makes it easier to account for 24 hour days. I’m a vet and I promise it’s not for “dress up” or offensive. Cops, like military, can be expected to work strange hours outside of the typical 9-5 and it just makes for less confusion. If you’re told to be somewhere at 1930, you’re not going to accidentally show up at 7:30 am. It’s a more efficient system and police departments are working 24/7
@@loganjackson675 ok. So I know nothing about military time! How is am and pm distinguished?? And the time thing is minor compared to their “battle gear”. I know many vets who are insulted by THAT and their military “titles”. The time thing was my own silly thought. Thanks for the correction sir and thank you for your service!🫡🇺🇸🦾
@@Nutnboujee thanks! And no worries! Definitely some cops try to be weirdly tactical, tbh it’s the same in the military. As for the difference in times, “military time” is just a 24 hour clock. There is no AM/PM like a 12 hour clock. 0000 is midnight/the start of the day and every minute it goes up by 0001 until 2359. The first two numbers are hours and the second two are minutes. So for example, if you wanted to indicate 7:30 AM, you’d say 0730. 7:30 PM would be 1930. You can think of it as 12 o’clock noon plus 7 hours=19, but eventually you just become used to automatically understanding it and not having to calculate. Don’t quote me but I’m also pretty sure that other 24 hour/emergency services use 24 hour clocks too, like hospitals for example.
Don’t ever do field sobriety tests!! Never never give a breath test, never give blood, keep quiet! Shut up ! Don’t answer questions. You have a right for an a attorney and the right to be quiet!!! Do that and nothing else
@@AuntClara0911 You still keep your mouth shut, if you do speak your only response should be "I do not answer questions" or "I will not answer any questions without an attorney present"
16:06 What I can tell the jury is the cop is not an ophthalmologist and nystagmus can appear for reasons otber than intoxication. Of course, if it doesn't appear, the cop will simply say that it did.
I bet guilty if there was an actual image of a bunch of whisky bottles all over the truck. An incorrect date stamp isn't going to make people look past that. I'm trying to figure out why he even took this case.
@@thenightingale7405 he was talking quite a bit about the cameras at the convenience store also. So the cameras at the convenient store must’ve caught something that he didn’t mention because the cop said he didn’t know if there were cameras or not.
I am struggling to find where exactly in the cross-examination did Larry break the officer's confidence. The officer was composed throughout his testimony, in my opinion. I've seen witnesses lose confidence on the stand...I don't see that here. To me, all Larry did was affirm the driver was in the truck at the convenience store with his foot on the brake in a truck cab full of mini bottles of Fireball. Is it because Larry caught a typo on the report regarding the date?
Try finding a lawyer. Here a lawyer to even talk to you wants 700 up front just to listen to you for 1 hr. Retainer can be up to 25,000-65,000. @@ultimatedouchebag6760
Why are we arresting people who are sleeping in a properly parked vehicle? Do cops go to rest stops at night and arrest people sleeping in their cars there? A vehicle that is parked poses zero danger, running or not. In fact, it's better for a person who maybe doesn't feel up to driving for any reason to park. Arresting people in parked vehicles motivates potentially drunk or fatigued people to drive when they shouldn't. The goal isn't safety, it's to make arrests, because arrests generate money. With 1.5 million DUI arrests each year, MADD gets $50 to $100 or more from each person arrested in the form of "participation fees" for people forced to attend victim impact panels. MADD doesn't pay every cop, but they do present awards to the cops who made the most arrests. Sounds like bribery to me.
The headline belongs more on a article at the times or post then this video which does not at all represent the officer being broken in half. If you're a drunk you want this guy....if you are a victim of a drunk driver you;ll be killed by one of the folks the DUI GUY helps to get off.
I must be watching the wrong video! The officer seemed very credible but the defence team seem lost and desperate. Accurate titling maybe the honorable thing to do. I'm not American
35:09 - Yeah, I think they weaselled in what the caller said there. I was surprised he even mentioned what was told to him by someone else (I've seen too much Judge Judy, I noticed right away, btw). 54:48 - The police officer for sure went from very confident to very humble in an instant here (by all means, he sounds like a great police officer, and I do trust that he does a great service to his community, he seems like he is very well mannered, not as in putting on a mask but as in it seems natural to him to be so). 59:12 - he is now mumbling where he was speaking loudly and clearly before. Not confident any more. 1:00:02 - the state attorney's posture also speaks volumes, btw.
The officer is a liar and tried to ruin this guy s life. Only God knows how many life's and families he destroyed, How can you think he does a good job if he's a terrible human being.?
I am wondering if a public records request would produce some additional info that could identify a patter. How many FST has this deputy given. How many in each of the past five years. How many of these tests resulted in a "pass" and how many in a "fail". The FST is designed to not be passed, but offer sufficient evidence to allow anyone to conclude a "fail". So, how many times as the officer failed a person taking these FST? And if that info is not being sparsed by the dept, it should be pointed out they are concealing that data.
Baffled at the change in attitude toward the defense right in front of the judge. The judge should have thrown the case out after his first 5 minutes of testimony when he admitted to arresting the guy on hearsay.
Every jury of any DUI trial should be instructed that police officers lie, alter the record and “forget” important information on a regular basis and anything the officer says should be considered a lie until it is proven to be true.
@wadewalton9612 I hear you. Well here's something I made up (inadvertently) tonight while I was lamenting Mr. Calvin Riley's verdict. It wasn't just the judge and jury who got it so very wrong, but the PER-SECUTOR was as dirty as the rest of them! Oops, I mean, "Prosecutor."
I have a question for you Americans. If you get a "not guilty" verdict, does that mean the arrest was unlawful? So would you have your solicitor fees paid? As what's to stop police from arresting you willy nilly just so you're out of pocket?
Sadly, there is no consequence to the prosecution when a defendant is vindicated - no reimbursed attorneys and other fees - nothing!! And usually, if there is an allegation that a witness committed perjury - or a prosecuting attorney - there are no consequences whatsoever.
Did you "ASK" him out of the car or did you "command" him to get out of the car? Because if you ask me to get out of the car, I'm going decline your request 100% of the time. I will refuse to exit my vehicle until you give me an order backed with a threat of arrest. Because then I will be suing you
"...how to break a Confident and Knowledgeable Police Officer in Half on the Witness Stand" - talk about **exaggeration**! Sheesh. If I were a DUI lawyer, I'd sure as heck NOT post a video where the alleged 'cop breaking' was about as easily spotted as a UFO in a snowstorm.
Why does the cop have headphones in his ears during the cross-examination? Is that really legal or allowed? It's pretty easy to support him by simply whispering everything to him.
The objection on the 3rd taillight should have been sustained. His prior testimony was not about the defendant's vehicle, it was about "MOST VEHICLES". Even the judge fought you on this one, claiming that the witness had already testified about the defendant's vehicle having a 3rd taillight.
Okay it’s just me according to the comments, what the heck am I listening out for? I couldn’t listen to all 50 mins of the direct but I did listen to all of the cross and I can’t see the police officer getting embarrassed, humiliated or shamed.n what am I missing?!
Here's the problem with Field Sobriety tests. Even if you pass, they will still arrest you 99.9% of the time because the typical cop ego will not allow them to ever admit being wrong. (have you ever seen a video of a cop releasing someone after passing a Field Sobriety test?). The cop decided you were guilty before he pulled you over. That's why it's important to have a good lawyer and fight these tyrants.
I'm confused, is the police report not usable because of the error? Is it automatic dismissal? I think the judge said "that blew it"...."the whole thing" at the end.
What's 2023 all police officers should be wearing a camera I don't know when this was done but come on in The last 5 years they've all had cameras on then. You better make darn sure you record with your phone
The officer was not telling the truth because he lied about a basic fact. When the prosecution asked him when he approached the vehicle was the driver side window up or down. He said he did not remember. Interesting enough, he said after he went around the truck and checked out the bed of the truck and saw the third brake light was on he came back around and asked the defendant to roll down his window. Which was it officer was the window up or down on your initial approach. You gave two conflicting answers. Were you lying the first time or when you said you asked the defendant to roll down his window? BUSTED!
Field sobriety tests are agility based. They dont prove guilt or innocence. In one of my criminal law classes, we debated the legality of field sobriety admissiblity compared to the same standard of lie detectors in criminal court for beyond a reasonable doubt. The debate became heated , very heated. In the end, we determined that field sobriety tests are not inclusive enough to sobriety alone to survive scrutiny. Only breathalyzer or blood draw are fact based enough to be admissible in court.
![DDG & G Herbo - Nosey [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/I9Ra0Zc2NlQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![Tee Grizzley - Blow for Blow (feat. J. Cole) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wNLN5xsx5dc/mqdefault.jpg)
It’s amazing how good this lawyer is. Every video I see, he picks out on the spot the moments and elements of the incident that are most significant and damning to the states case and just absolutely embarrasses the cops time after time after time
Ya, try that with me bubba
@@cakej1you'll get spanked like a bad kid too bubba
Can you explain cause I don't see it.
@@KoolBreeze420There was no 'breaking in half' in this video. What the heck?
The question every officer needs ask in court about the field sobriety test is how the person does at this test sober
Exactly 💯😂
Yes
...I've tried it sober, 15 years sober. Many times I tried, can't do it. Most of us after a certain age have injuries, arthritis, can't see, can't hear lol. 😊
Similarly I was going to say they must be asked "how often do these test produce false positives?" If they cant answer that then they CANT know how reliable the tests are. IOW in addition to you perfectly sensible idea that you cant know if this SPECIFIC person performed poorly if you have not seen hem perform sober, But also you cant know how well the performed if you don't know how the population at large performs
@@chasethecat3839 yep I say the officer should have to do the full test for the jury and judge to show them how sober people do them just think they would have practiced it and probably fail
Sadly, I have tried it once and it backfired. The cop said a sober person, based on the field studies done by NHTSA, would would exhibit fewer clues than an intoxicated person. Although in practice, your answer is spot on, some cops have this standard embedded in their brain. Even without it, it gives the officer too much wiggle room on cross examination, so I would avoid that question in court, unless you have your own expert to counter what the officer is saying.
I can’t perform those tests sober.
Exactly 💯
That’s exactly what they are hoping you will say
@@Kthb80
Only dumb drunks say that. 😂
Sorry - I must have missed where the officer was broken.?.?
Based on this video - verdict guilty
when a cop says im drunk and tells me i HAVE to do their dog and pony show i say NOPE give me a breath test i am NOT here for your amusement and when a cop says my name is officer jones or sergeant jones or chief of police jones from the point where they say that i then refer to them as employee jones i will say the same thing to a senator or congressman. they all seem to have forgotten WHO they work for. they ARE our employees until we break the law!
I agree with you, but not fully.
First, I would never refer to someone as "employee [name]", that's just disrespectful. If you want to do that from the start, that's up to you, but you're choosing to start an interaction with someone disrespectfully.
Second, we vote Senators/Congressmen and other specified positions into office, as outlined by law and the constitution. Officers of the law for example are not voted upon positions, therefore they really don't work for you, but for the hierarchal body that you generally voted for to create/manage these types of systems. Referring to any Officer as "employee" again would just be disrespectful, that's like referring to any judge as "employee" rather than "your honor", they would not appreciate that and your court case would likely be a rough case.
Third, who the people voted into office work for are the collective people that voted them in, not just any one person. For example, the Senator for your state represents your entire state, not just you. The representative for you in congress represents your entire district, not just you. While generally they should account for complaints and take those into consideration, there's more to it than just you.
I otherwise fully agree with you, if you know you had not drank anything the whole day and an officer accuses of otherwise, I'd go straight to a breath test as well. At that point, it's just an improper stop and the officer has no other reason to investigate further once his or her original suspicions are no longer valid.
They serve and swear and oath to the Corporation that America was put under, not We the people, yet we pay their salaries, benefits and pay for any settlements from lawsuits. How's that grab ya? Grabs me right in the ba__s and purse strings and passes me off
shut up
Sorry, either way, they don't work for us. They work for themselves and their interest!
i’m kind of lost here. I watched the whole video to the end and all I saw was him asking about the difference between September 23 and September 26. There was no end to the case nothing was said the video just ended. Did he win or lose this case? I don’t understand!
the officer did well, the date is an error, it means nothing to the case
Still doesn’t answer my question but thank you
@@Jpassione58 don't know the outcome either, but what the officer said on the stand did not take away from his testimony, my guess is the guy was found guilty.
I've tried doing the balance tests completely sober and on my own with no pressure and failed them, there's no way i could do them on the road in the cold at night with an arrest threatening me.
Well, unopened bottles of alcohol aren’t illegal to carry. The opened empty bottles could have been drunk previously, and he put the trash in his vehicle. No way to tell when the bottles were opened and consumed.
Exactly, they need evidence beyond a reasonable doubt
Ive never seen a prosecutor put their foot up on the podium and stand like that while conducting direct questioning.😂 very professional.
It is incomprehensible to me that a US police officer is allowed to take a medical sobriety test and that this is even recognized in court. As far as eyes are concerned, there are so many factors that a non-medical person can hardly tell the difference. Especially if you wave a flashlight in front of your face in the dark. These tests should be abolished for cops.
There is ALWAYS someone coughing in court
Cops always testify FST’s are voluntary but they don’t pretend them to be in the field in most cases. Never do them in the field especially if you have consumed alcohol. If you have not consumed alcohol I would opt for a blood test if they offer that option as FST’s are very faulty and left to interpretation by sometimes poorly trained cops. Even the breathalyzers are faulty and can give a false positive reading. If you are DWI over the limit, you are going to lose your license anyway in most cases.The only difference is you aren’t helping the cop build a case against you by refusing FST’s, the best thing is to not drink and drive.
I want him as my lawyer
This cop knows alot about getting a tight seal on "the straw"
30 sec v. 47 sec. Probably means you are a chronically late person.
I hate courtroom cameras that "float" between views randomly.
What does someone with severe arthritis do? It's stacked against you.
ok i think i see there are only 3 jurors. this is fascinating.
Confident and knowledgable? Dont you mean afraid (officer safety!) and a cop?
each state has few game wardens...he must of thought he had a door open then found..nope that door closed so off to be a cop...GW have a hell of a lot of power..I was talking to one days ago about laws in Ohio and wildlife
WTF HAPPENED BY THE END OF THE VIDEO??????
This is life or live replay?
This is life.
@@nathanc.4862 Well played.
Jim, This is life, but Police Officers treat it as Cosplay.
Was your guy found innocent or guilty? I did not see any thing here what you refer in the heading?
They actually train officers to be courteous?!?!?! I call BS!!!!
Lip service to the rest of us.
They are trained to see us as the enemy.
Only in court, otherwise in public they can be a professoinal dick to people.
Do not kill yourself win4jesse
Courteous an how to lie
I had a traffic ticket dismissed because it was filled out wrong. Putting in the wrong date of the incident may be very significant.
Same. Cop put my vehicle year as 2030. Bout 40 years newer than it actually is.
I had different addresses of 2 different places on my ticket. They had the year make and model of my bike wrong and no video. Wanted to take it to trial and still got a reckless
More courses on the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS of WE THE PEOPLE are in DIRE NEED in the United States of America for these public servants!!!!
It's by design they don't teach them that. They serve the Corporation that the powers that be put America under...not We the people
AMEN!! Cops are in Desperate Need of EDUCATION about the history of policing and what our LAWS ARE!! They should know AT LEAST as much as we citizens do!!!!🤦🏼♀️🇺🇸🦾
All that money and effort spent getting a degree in forestry…..and he’s a patrol officer working 3rd shift 8 years later. I question that officer’s judgement.
I can respect wanting to be a game warden and finding a new path once that didn't work out. I imagine that the demand for game wardens is pretty mid.
I thought police rotated the overnight shifts, or is it seniority based?
You know something happened hes leaving out.
@@veithkilbert4253Depends on how the town manager or Chief, Sheriff wants it. I've talked to a bunch of em and it's pretty much discretion of whomever is making the rules, so to speak.
I looked up the salaries, pretty much same starting to top 10%. 40-47k and 46-56k top top 10, 70-76k. Google it, there's a lot of this and that to determine.
I could be stone cold sober and fail all the tests except the one where you move your eyes..not everyone had good balance even when sober
A one legged man would fail because he had one foot continuously on the ground. LEO dismiss any disability that would affect the outcome of the "tests."
Should really show the verdict at the end of all of this, sometimes the courts still find in the officers favour even after they've been proven to be making up stuff.
This is a perfect example of why you record all police. This cop said he has no body cam or car cam. If you have camera evidence to present in court and he has none, it's his word against your video proof. He loses every time. They should lose if it's his word against ours.
They need to train all officers in the constitution!
They know it, they just don't care to follow it because they don't have to. And if you as a citizen try to express your rights that just pisses them off even more.
If that was the case then there would be a hell of a lot less cops.
@@SimBir08I bet you, you ask 95% of cops do not know the 5 elements of the first Amendment...... Walk up to a few and ask? It's crazy 😢
They're trained to be modern day judge dredds, " I am the law"
LEO are trained …. to find evidence to use against civilians
lawful police are few and far between….
lawful means serving the people
that employ them ( us citizens)
and protecting the rights of same people
AND UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION
well
tyrants with badges in third word countries they copy
they serve themselves !!!
revel in mistreating civilians
- LEO and their families
speed , are immune to
law breaking
again
it use to be they
served us
they protected us
they are REVENUE DRIVEN
egotistical tyrants
bullying citizens
not all are revenue driven
but they mostly are
revenue they need to get their
shiny toys
I could never convidt on police testimony alone since they are permitted to lie and that alone always brings "reasonable doubt "besides how can a career liar possibly have any credibility in court?
Police are allowed to lie in questioning during an Interrogation NOT sworn in on the stand in court. That's the whole raise your right hand bit they do at the beginning when they take the stand. Do some lie on the stand? Oh I'm sure. But they're not permitted to.
I thought the judge would fall asleep about 50 times during the trial.
How did the officer get broken here? What am I missing?
At 58:47 is where I think things went wrong.
@@bombcherryjuice2000 SO it all falls apart because of a date being written wrong on an additional page? All I got from this is lawyers are slimy jerks!
@@TheChrisPineWorkshop the same thing was done at Idaho 4 case, the detective wrote " knife was placed beside victim on bed, later it was written knife was found under the blanket partially visible beside victim, so the detective wrote what he did, same as this dui officer done when he changed the paper or added to it but he Fd up with the date....LE is not your friend they are licensed liars and killers with QI
💪Larry, I admire your knowledge, skills & appreciate you sharing these videos.
Police dashcams have been a standard thing since the 1990's and this police dept still doesn't have them?!?
Standard doesn’t mean all departments/ jurisdictions have funds for them.
@@retiredhockeymom2662true and some don't have them because they're corrupt and don't want proof of it
Kentucky State Police doesn't have them either.
I live in WV & our law enforcement doesn't have body cams or DASHCAMS! I think it should be REQUIRED for ALL law enforcement.
@@retiredhockeymom2662yet they never seem to have a problem finding funding for weapons and tactical vehicles that would rival that of some small nations armies.
Did I hear this correctly? This man was initially charged in 2018 and is only getting to trial now a couple weeks ago in 2023?
Remember the 2 years of slow courts during Covid.
@@PntsOnTheGround I feel like the courts should be able to be held liable for this. I know that my job immediately picked up the required technology to work remotely and we didn't miss a beat. We strangely become statistically more productive during that time period. The courts should have been able to do the same thing.
@@thenightingale7405they adapted for bench trials but jury trials are more difficult when done remotely. I saw a couple and it was a nightmare.
@thenightingale7405 yep! I work for a nonprofit with very limited funding, and we were working virtually 5 days after the government took away our rights. The judicial system should've been on the ball a lot faster than most other businesses and companies.
Well, u know, Covid. No one worked. The IRS is 2 years behind now and our local DSSis JUST now telling employees, they can no longer work from home every one I know that works for the government, working from home, has had a 4 year vacation- paid well for it and the best health insurance ever. Hmmm.
Great job DUI GUY. LOVE AND PRAYERS SIR❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊❤
WTF? How was this breaking the officer? Where's the rest of the trial and verdict?
I see your a G.E.D kind of person. It's ok. The video won't go nowhere watch it again bub.
@@TheMexicanU.S.Marine lol you are a legend 😂
Why the heck are police using MILITARY TIME?? And military titles!! Creepy and kind of disgusting! Just like their dress-up gear. It’s like stolen valor!!!
What 😂 it just makes it easier to account for 24 hour days. I’m a vet and I promise it’s not for “dress up” or offensive. Cops, like military, can be expected to work strange hours outside of the typical 9-5 and it just makes for less confusion. If you’re told to be somewhere at 1930, you’re not going to accidentally show up at 7:30 am. It’s a more efficient system and police departments are working 24/7
@@loganjackson675 ok. So I know nothing about military time! How is am and pm distinguished?? And the time thing is minor compared to their “battle gear”. I know many vets who are insulted by THAT and their military “titles”. The time thing was my own silly thought. Thanks for the correction sir and thank you for your service!🫡🇺🇸🦾
@@Nutnboujee thanks! And no worries! Definitely some cops try to be weirdly tactical, tbh it’s the same in the military.
As for the difference in times, “military time” is just a 24 hour clock. There is no AM/PM like a 12 hour clock. 0000 is midnight/the start of the day and every minute it goes up by 0001 until 2359. The first two numbers are hours and the second two are minutes. So for example, if you wanted to indicate 7:30 AM, you’d say 0730. 7:30 PM would be 1930. You can think of it as 12 o’clock noon plus 7 hours=19, but eventually you just become used to automatically understanding it and not having to calculate.
Don’t quote me but I’m also pretty sure that other 24 hour/emergency services use 24 hour clocks too, like hospitals for example.
Don’t ever do field sobriety tests!! Never never give a breath test, never give blood, keep quiet! Shut up ! Don’t answer questions. You have a right for an a attorney and the right to be quiet!!! Do that and nothing else
What if your stopped for something else unrelated?
You have the right to counsel your attorney will throw you into the bus
Really? Never knew you could refuse. Basically you just buying time. So your levels drop👍🏽
@@AuntClara0911 You still keep your mouth shut, if you do speak your only response should be "I do not answer questions" or "I will not answer any questions without an attorney present"
@@AuntClara0911How do you know if it is unrelated? Cops get bonuses for DUI arrests. Every stop may be a DUI stop.
He said "getting hammered after the lunch break" 🤣🤣
What part was that at?
@@traviscrum5860 in the video description lol
I’m amazed that we’re supposed to believe that people have perfect recall of five year old events. 😅
16:06 What I can tell the jury is the cop is not an ophthalmologist and nystagmus can appear for reasons otber than intoxication. Of course, if it doesn't appear, the cop will simply say that it did.
Police in the USA should not be allowed to lie to Suspects and on official police repots documents.
"Right-Here your Honor." would be like mooning the Judge.
What was the verdict?
I bet guilty if there was an actual image of a bunch of whisky bottles all over the truck. An incorrect date stamp isn't going to make people look past that. I'm trying to figure out why he even took this case.
@@thenightingale7405 he was talking quite a bit about the cameras at the convenience store also. So the cameras at the convenient store must’ve caught something that he didn’t mention because the cop said he didn’t know if there were cameras or not.
I am struggling to find where exactly in the cross-examination did Larry break the officer's confidence. The officer was composed throughout his testimony, in my opinion. I've seen witnesses lose confidence on the stand...I don't see that here. To me, all Larry did was affirm the driver was in the truck at the convenience store with his foot on the brake in a truck cab full of mini bottles of Fireball. Is it because Larry caught a typo on the report regarding the date?
Yay! A DUI GUY+ Premiere on my Birthday. 💜👍🎉
Happy Birthday
Happy Birthday
Happy birthday ❤
Of I'm ever in the US Larry, and I'm in trouble, you're getting a call!!
You still do trials? 😊. I’ve been patiently waiting for more courtroom footage! Thx.
Its like they give them permission to lie...where did the "So help me God" go?
It went down the toilet with the constitution. Nothing it kangaroo courts and a pay to play system of profit nowadays
Clowns think that putting you in jail, it's over. However, it's just a start of a long process
Can say that again but what lawyer will do it cases like this you have to sell your house. Only the rich get off from this crooked system.
@@roberthodges3646 are you kidding me? its free......the city will pay for everything in the end.
Try finding a lawyer. Here a lawyer to even talk to you wants 700 up front just to listen to you for 1 hr. Retainer can be up to 25,000-65,000. @@ultimatedouchebag6760
@@roberthodges3646 pay to play system for sure
I'm surprised some of the jury doesn't fall asleep his questioning is so long and drawn out with gaps in between questions
I love being able to hear the sidebar conversations! EVERY court should have them on microphone.
You are good Larry !
Why are we arresting people who are sleeping in a properly parked vehicle? Do cops go to rest stops at night and arrest people sleeping in their cars there? A vehicle that is parked poses zero danger, running or not. In fact, it's better for a person who maybe doesn't feel up to driving for any reason to park. Arresting people in parked vehicles motivates potentially drunk or fatigued people to drive when they shouldn't. The goal isn't safety, it's to make arrests, because arrests generate money. With 1.5 million DUI arrests each year, MADD gets $50 to $100 or more from each person arrested in the form of "participation fees" for people forced to attend victim impact panels. MADD doesn't pay every cop, but they do present awards to the cops who made the most arrests. Sounds like bribery to me.
How can career liars have any credibility in court? Always brings reasonable doubt
What does that officer have in his ear?
The headline belongs more on a article at the times or post then this video which does not at all represent the officer being broken in half. If you're a drunk you want this guy....if you are a victim of a drunk driver you;ll be killed by one of the folks the DUI GUY helps to get off.
I must be watching the wrong video! The officer seemed very credible but the defence team seem lost and desperate. Accurate titling maybe the honorable thing to do. I'm not American
35:09 - Yeah, I think they weaselled in what the caller said there. I was surprised he even mentioned what was told to him by someone else (I've seen too much Judge Judy, I noticed right away, btw).
54:48 - The police officer for sure went from very confident to very humble in an instant here (by all means, he sounds like a great police officer, and I do trust that he does a great service to his community, he seems like he is very well mannered, not as in putting on a mask but as in it seems natural to him to be so).
59:12 - he is now mumbling where he was speaking loudly and clearly before. Not confident any more.
1:00:02 - the state attorney's posture also speaks volumes, btw.
The officer is a liar and tried to ruin this guy s life. Only God knows how many life's and families he destroyed, How can you think he does a good job if he's a terrible human being.?
what did i miss?????
Oooo! Who's the other dude with you! He's a Tasmania devil! 😂 He really went in on that objection! 👍
Why is the audio so clear and understandable ? This seems so strange.
What he fails to tell you is the Jury found him Guilty of DUI 2nd and sentenced him 45 days.
Why put blood tests in a mailbox. I thought blood had to be kept at a certain temperature?
I missed “the break” of the officer…? What was the verdict?
The cop never broke, the man is clearly guilty. His attorney was horrible.
So the mere presence of empty bottles is supposed to mean that the suspect drank all the contents of all these bottles that particular night?
1:00:02 The lawyer's body language shout out loud and clear, damn we're screwed.
I am wondering if a public records request would produce some additional info that could identify a patter.
How many FST has this deputy given. How many in each of the past five years. How many of these tests resulted in a "pass" and how many in a "fail". The FST is designed to not be passed, but offer sufficient evidence to allow anyone to conclude a "fail". So, how many times as the officer failed a person taking these FST? And if that info is not being sparsed by the dept, it should be pointed out they are concealing that data.
abrupt ending....😮
This cop uses really big words so he must be at least an optometrist.
Sorry I couldn't get past at 4:30+ ish. The judge put his fingure in his ear then in his mouth. So gross.
Baffled at the change in attitude toward the defense right in front of the judge. The judge should have thrown the case out after his first 5 minutes of testimony when he admitted to arresting the guy on hearsay.
Every jury of any DUI trial should be instructed that police officers lie, alter the record and “forget” important information on a regular basis and anything the officer says should be considered a lie until it is proven to be true.
It's true actually--they should know that cops are allowed to lie. It is certainly a relevant factor!!
@@rightsarentwrongthey all joke about it to and even have a cute lil name for it....they refer to giving testimony as testilying😂
@wadewalton9612 oh wow that makes my blood boil. Karma. It's real..they will see.
@wadewalton9612 I hear you. Well here's something I made up (inadvertently) tonight while I was lamenting Mr. Calvin Riley's verdict. It wasn't just the judge and jury who got it so very wrong, but the PER-SECUTOR was as dirty as the rest of them! Oops, I mean, "Prosecutor."
My first question: have you ever lied while on duty, and if yes, how can we tell if you are lying now ? If no we know you are lying
I have a question for you Americans.
If you get a "not guilty" verdict, does that mean the arrest was unlawful? So would you have your solicitor fees paid?
As what's to stop police from arresting you willy nilly just so you're out of pocket?
Sadly, there is no consequence to the prosecution when a defendant is vindicated - no reimbursed attorneys and other fees - nothing!! And usually, if there is an allegation that a witness committed perjury - or a prosecuting attorney - there are no consequences whatsoever.
Well, it being Sunday I guess that was a silly question sorry. 😂
Clerk flipping hair is a flirting maneuver
Did you "ASK" him out of the car or did you "command" him to get out of the car? Because if you ask me to get out of the car, I'm going decline your request 100% of the time. I will refuse to exit my vehicle until you give me an order backed with a threat of arrest. Because then I will be suing you
HI LARRY
"...how to break a Confident and Knowledgeable Police Officer in Half on the Witness Stand" - talk about **exaggeration**! Sheesh.
If I were a DUI lawyer, I'd sure as heck NOT post a video where the alleged 'cop breaking' was about as easily spotted as a UFO in a snowstorm.
Why does the cop have headphones in his ears during the cross-examination? Is that really legal or allowed? It's pretty easy to support him by simply whispering everything to him.
The objection on the 3rd taillight should have been sustained. His prior testimony was not about the defendant's vehicle, it was about "MOST VEHICLES".
Even the judge fought you on this one, claiming that the witness had already testified about the defendant's vehicle having a 3rd taillight.
Okay it’s just me according to the comments, what the heck am I listening out for? I couldn’t listen to all 50 mins of the direct but I did listen to all of the cross and I can’t see the police officer getting embarrassed, humiliated or shamed.n what am I missing?!
Here's the problem with Field Sobriety tests. Even if you pass, they will still arrest you 99.9% of the time because the typical cop ego will not allow them to ever admit being wrong. (have you ever seen a video of a cop releasing someone after passing a Field Sobriety test?). The cop decided you were guilty before he pulled you over. That's why it's important to have a good lawyer and fight these tyrants.
Jezz, in the US you don't need eye doctors!! Just get a cop give you a field sobriety check! WOW
Jezz, in the US you don't need eye doctors!! Just get a cop give you a field sobriety check! WOW
I like being able to listen in to sidebars.
Coppers don’t give a rats. They get paid OT to be in court and protected by qualified immunity. That’s why qualified immunity must be abolished
I'm confused, is the police report not usable because of the error? Is it automatic dismissal? I think the judge said "that blew it"...."the whole thing" at the end.
What's 2023 all police officers should be wearing a camera I don't know when this was done but come on in The last 5 years they've all had cameras on then. You better make darn sure you record with your phone
The officer was not telling the truth because he lied about a basic fact. When the prosecution asked him when he approached the vehicle was the driver side window up or down. He said he did not remember. Interesting enough, he said after he went around the truck and checked out the bed of the truck and saw the third brake light was on he came back around and asked the defendant to roll down his window. Which was it officer was the window up or down on your initial approach. You gave two conflicting answers. Were you lying the first time or when you said you asked the defendant to roll down his window? BUSTED!
Did the clip end before the broken back? Lol
The prosecutor was standing during exsamination like he was in the Pub not a Court room. Cutton Eye Joe! Disrespectful.
Field sobriety tests are agility based. They dont prove guilt or innocence. In one of my criminal law classes, we debated the legality of field sobriety admissiblity compared to the same standard of lie detectors in criminal court for beyond a reasonable doubt. The debate became heated , very heated. In the end, we determined that field sobriety tests are not inclusive enough to sobriety alone to survive scrutiny. Only breathalyzer or blood draw are fact based enough to be admissible in court.
Wonder why 3rd shift? But is could be officer likes 3rd shift...in my youth it was my favorite shift.
Confused. Came onto live, exited chat to 👍, no longer available to live chat.🤔