Escape From Death Diorama - Tamiya 1/48 Spitfire Mk.Vb - (Epoxy Resin Water Diorama)

Поделиться
HTML-код

Комментарии • 46

  • @PAIKURA
    @PAIKURA Месяц назад +9

    Great Diorama! The pilot clearly got jumped and didnt have time to open the canopy, or he is seriously wounded. Tight grouping of spash rounds behind him suggets his adversary is very close! Nice :)

  • @andrewhull7296
    @andrewhull7296 Месяц назад +7

    I have no words! I am in complete awe of your skills. I've been building model kits since I was 7 years old and it warms my heart to see folks like yourself keeping this art alive.
    Well done

  • @Omletik134
    @Omletik134 Месяц назад +1

    Супер ,гарна робота!

    • @BedirhanAlbayrak
      @BedirhanAlbayrak  Месяц назад +1

      Thank you my friend 🙏🏻🙏🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻

  • @jeebeefy9878
    @jeebeefy9878 Месяц назад +4

    Very well build. Beautifull paintjob. Original idea for the diorama also. Unfortunately the North Sea above which the Battle of England took place has no blue water, but brownish water. A not so small detail. But overall congatulations.

  • @Forest_man_bricks-oc6um
    @Forest_man_bricks-oc6um Месяц назад +2

    Very clever idea and very detailed

  • @vodkamolotov-scale-modeler
    @vodkamolotov-scale-modeler Месяц назад +3

    Lovely diorama. Nice work and thanks to share

  • @peacefrog5193
    @peacefrog5193 Месяц назад +3

    Nice one, like these type of builds

  • @goforitpainting
    @goforitpainting Месяц назад +2

    Really cool effects. 🖌

  • @tpd71261
    @tpd71261 Месяц назад +1

    Outstanding job. love your work!!!!

    • @BedirhanAlbayrak
      @BedirhanAlbayrak  Месяц назад

      Thank you so much mate 🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻

  • @stefanschwarz1968
    @stefanschwarz1968 Месяц назад +2

    Gute Idee und gut umgesetzt

  • @rogu395
    @rogu395 Месяц назад +1

    Awesome idea brother 👌🏻🔥

  • @ICEM4NIII1
    @ICEM4NIII1 Месяц назад +3

    My only complaint, because it catches my eye more than anything is the missing wing roundels, the fusealage roundels being so far out of alignment and the under wing roundels being in the wrong place. A way for you to take this to the next level could be to try and paint your own roundels? Other than that your epoxy work and finished diorama is brilliant! I wish I had thr knowhow to attempt making my own.

    • @BedirhanAlbayrak
      @BedirhanAlbayrak  Месяц назад

      Thank you so much my friend for your kind words. I will keep them in my mind.

  • @glynchivers9519
    @glynchivers9519 Месяц назад +4

    Great build, but why no tail markings or wing roundels ?

    • @BedirhanAlbayrak
      @BedirhanAlbayrak  Месяц назад

      Thank you my friend. I could not applicate some of them on the damaged areas and some of them are decayed easily :(

  • @nidge2822
    @nidge2822 Месяц назад +1

    Absolutely great build my friend what was the psi you sprayed at and did you thin the black primer, only asking as i have a sparmax set up and im very new to making models 😊

    • @BedirhanAlbayrak
      @BedirhanAlbayrak  Месяц назад +1

      Thank you my friend. I used 1.8/2 psi, and yes I always thin this vallejo primer with his thinner with ratio 90% primer + 10% thinner 🙏🏻

    • @nidge2822
      @nidge2822 Месяц назад

      @@BedirhanAlbayrak 1.8 2psi what does this mean please ? My needle is 0.3 and psi is set to 25 ,this is confusing 😕

    • @BedirhanAlbayrak
      @BedirhanAlbayrak  Месяц назад +1

      @@nidge2822 psi means that pressure of the air comes from your compressor of airbrush. Before painting any models, I suggest you to paint any plastic box with your airbrush and change all settings on your compressor to learn how it works 🙏🏻 1,8 or 2 psi is good for painting, but I do not know what is the equality for your compressor, it can be changed on by one.

    • @nidge2822
      @nidge2822 Месяц назад +1

      @@BedirhanAlbayrak many thanks my friend

  • @КоляГерасимов-я5ы
    @КоляГерасимов-я5ы Месяц назад +1

    👍

  • @TonyKelly-p7x
    @TonyKelly-p7x Месяц назад +1

    Incredible build.

  • @daneshivers2921
    @daneshivers2921 Месяц назад +1

    Beautiful job except for the missing markings...they do kinda have to be there Dane

    • @BedirhanAlbayrak
      @BedirhanAlbayrak  Месяц назад

      Thank you my friend. I couldnot manage these markings because of some damage effects area on the plane.

  • @allcoldb9247
    @allcoldb9247 Месяц назад +1

    Почему на верхних плоскостях нет опознавательных знаков?

    • @BedirhanAlbayrak
      @BedirhanAlbayrak  Месяц назад

      I could not applicate these marks because of damaged areas on the wings🥲

    • @allcoldb9247
      @allcoldb9247 Месяц назад +1

      @@BedirhanAlbayrak жаль. Прекрасная работа. Ну и всплески от попаданий, думаю их надо делать от меньшего к большему. Пусть разница будет небольшой, но мне кажется она должна быть.

  • @milvus6765
    @milvus6765 Месяц назад +1

    The case when the author has no idea about the design of the aircraft, the model of which he decided to assemble. And I should have familiarized myself with it a little, before I "punched" the model.
    The holes in the right console, next to the gun, are located in the location of the shell boxes. The hole in the fuselage, behind the cockpit, is located exactly where the auxiliary fuel tank is installed. The hole on the left console, next to the gun, is located exactly where the power spar passes (the MK Vb had a single-spar caisson wing), with such damage the wing would not survive and would fall off. When hired, it would lose its shape.
    For diligence - a higher score, for execution - unsatisfactory.

    • @BedirhanAlbayrak
      @BedirhanAlbayrak  Месяц назад +3

      I am really pleased you had the time to make detailed comments, my friend. I am bored with making details on my models based on reality or references. I only focus on what satisfies me when the whole model is finished. 🙏

    • @milvus6765
      @milvus6765 Месяц назад +2

      Thank you for understanding and for such a thoughtful answer.
      You are the author and this is your right. Well, I still couldn't refrain from commenting on such obvious blunders.
      Good luck in your future endeavors.
      Sincerely.​@@BedirhanAlbayrak

    • @BedirhanAlbayrak
      @BedirhanAlbayrak  Месяц назад +1

      @@milvus6765 I would like you to comment on my next videos, my friend, thank you for your kind comments. Your subtle and realistic comments will improve my model quality.

    • @FinsburyPhil
      @FinsburyPhil Месяц назад +3

      If you are going to be critical, then I think you should be more accurate...there were no auxiliary fuel tanks in the rear fuselage of a Spitfire Mk.V

    • @milvus6765
      @milvus6765 Месяц назад +1

      Sorry, thanks for your comment. Indeed, on the MK V there was no additional fuel tank in the fuselage, behind the cockpit. Confused with Supermarine Spitfire MK IX.
      Sincerely​@@FinsburyPhil