The Cold War: A Very Short Introduction

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 янв 2025

Комментарии • 37

  • @rebeccakaindi5269
    @rebeccakaindi5269 2 месяца назад +2

    For future generations who love audio books:
    Ch. 4 starts - 2:07:13
    Ch. 5 starts - 2:57:40
    Ch. 6 starts - 3:53:19
    Ch.7 starts - 4:35:36
    Ch. 8 starts - 5:26:01
    I'll come back and find the first 3 and the next parts.

    • @dareloh8578
      @dareloh8578 28 дней назад +1

      And just when we needed him most he vanished

    • @rebeccakaindi5269
      @rebeccakaindi5269 27 дней назад

      @@dareloh8578 college is beating me up right now, but I'll try : )

  • @marylee8372
    @marylee8372 2 года назад +5

    Good information and analysis of a very interesting period of recent history.
    Thanks for posting with BLACK SCREEN!

    • @bookhome975
      @bookhome975  Год назад

      You are welcome. What is your taste?

    • @marylee8372
      @marylee8372 Год назад +1

      @@bookhome975 I like history in general. This was really interesting to me because I lived through it but was completely unaware of the bigger picture of what was happening, WHILE it was happening. And PS, the BLACK SCREEN is really good for saving phone battery.

    • @bookhome975
      @bookhome975  Год назад

      You can share your favorite history books with me. Why history is important to you? Why not novels and philosophy?

    • @marylee8372
      @marylee8372 Год назад +2

      @@bookhome975 Novels, good, depending on author. Philosophy, good, as long as it's not Western straight everything-is-so-terrible-poor-me philosophy.
      I like authors like Kafka, who is a Western philosophy/novel crossover but I am burnt out on other crossovers like the Russians' "War and Peace" and "Crime and Punishment."
      I also like Henry James and F. Scott Fitzgerald, but I also like political novels like "The Quiet American" and "The Mandarins."

    • @marylee8372
      @marylee8372 Год назад +1

      Speaking of Henry James, it would be amazing (or hilarious) to listen to a narrator try to take on some of those notoriously long sentences in "The Golden Bowl." 😉

  • @katelyncook9057
    @katelyncook9057 2 года назад +4

    This is great!

  • @lambdacalculus8316
    @lambdacalculus8316 Год назад +3

    Well written, well-read, and thought-provoking!

  • @gallantserver
    @gallantserver 11 месяцев назад +1

    About 48:00 is when chapter 2 starts

  • @DaveSCameron
    @DaveSCameron Год назад +3

    Many thanks and please share more if possible 📚

    • @DaveSCameron
      @DaveSCameron Год назад +2

      I was surprised just how Short, this Short History turned out to be, I'd be more than interested in something similar with flesh on the bones of each aspect touched upon in this excellent, concise read. 👍

  • @Ronald-wv1bz
    @Ronald-wv1bz Год назад +5

    Wonder if narrator can get any closer to mic without choking on it.

  • @sunsleep230
    @sunsleep230 2 года назад +3

    Can you do “the Tudors- a very short introduction”? Would be extremely appreciated!

  • @albertomaganaiii851
    @albertomaganaiii851 3 месяца назад

    Need help with finding when chapters end and start

  • @mutthuselvam7610
    @mutthuselvam7610 Год назад +1

    Thanks

  • @rubenjames7345
    @rubenjames7345 3 месяца назад

    It's ironic that anyone could accuse Churchill of appeasement.

  • @Edward-ry1jk
    @Edward-ry1jk Год назад

    1:23:23

  • @bweresquirrel8279
    @bweresquirrel8279 2 года назад +3

    Not a word about US wartime rationing, which was 3 gallons of gasoline per week for families not employed in specific exempted occupations. Or food rationing, which was serious enough that 40% of the nation's vegetable output was grown in backyard gardens in 1943. Or housing shortages, which had war industry factory workers in San Diego living in tent cities until the government put up hasty temporary housing.
    Yes other countries had it worse. Yes the United States emerged from the war with a strengthened economy. Yet this "short introduction" glosses over significant facts to the point of misleading its audience.

    • @darrenwainwright680
      @darrenwainwright680 2 года назад +1

      Shut up

    • @katelynholmes9504
      @katelynholmes9504 Год назад +2

      Why in the world is 1940s rationing relevant to a Cold War discussion
      A summary doesn’t need information about lifestyle deprivations that didn’t bear on the most important political decisions

    • @Freefolkcreate
      @Freefolkcreate 8 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@katelynholmes9504 Did you listen to the whole book? It's relevant because it does talk about that very period.

    • @ThePotatoFurher.
      @ThePotatoFurher. 4 месяца назад

      That's hot war time....
      Not cold war...

  • @ДмитрийДепутатов
    @ДмитрийДепутатов 3 месяца назад

    Gonzalez Deborah Lee Ronald White Sandra

  • @Edward-ry1jk
    @Edward-ry1jk Год назад

    2:21:59