You are the greatest. Seriously- my contracts professor is very unclear at times and your videos have really helped me get through the semester without being too stressed about the material.
🚨 SPECIAL OFFER: Want to crush law school finals, rack up scholarship $$$, pass the bar exam, and practice law like a BOSS? Take the LEAP. Get started today for free at: www.studicata.com/leap
Question: Under an option contract to purchase land(consideration provided by rent/lease agreement), I reject the option to purchase the land… the next day(within the time frame provided), I say I accept… is the offer terminated even though it’s under an option contract?
In regards to constructive revocation, what if the offeree accepted and had not discovered the offeror had sold the marker to someone else? Is the offer still open so long as the offeree is not aware of the offerors actions?
Revocation has to be communicated either directly or indirectly with the offeree. If there is no communication, there is no revocation. However, the revocation can be indirectly communicated ONLY if the source is reliable. As in, an item that was offered to you by person A is sold to your neighbor and they tell oh wow I got a great day on xyz from person A. Even if you say wait they offered it to ME!!! It doesn’t matter, the revocation is now indirectly communicated, and the offer no longer exists. You can’t then go to person A and say YES I accept!! Hope that helped
Good question! Yes. Destruction of property and supervening illegality can terminate the offer if these acts occur before acceptance. However, once the offer is accepted, destruction of property and supervening illegality generally operate as excuses that can discharge a party's duty to perform under the contract. Notably, I plan to cover all of this is in greater detail when we get to our videos on performance.
For Senate to defend their position in law against the narcissist, they have to get an attitude and be firm with the guys asking you to let them anyways. Jesus doesn't afford that attitude. Why? Because it's not the females job in honor.
![Contract Law: Termination of the Offer and Irrevocable Offers [LEAP Preview]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KGvippm1zQ4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Contract Law: Termination of the Offer and Irrevocable Offers [LEAP Preview]](/img/tr.png)
Thank you. I'm skipping the other commercial courses and will be going with studicata. Your explanations are second to none!
You are the greatest. Seriously- my contracts professor is very unclear at times and your videos have really helped me get through the semester without being too stressed about the material.
I think ALL CONTRACT Professors are unclear af!!!! Mine is horrible....these video's help sooo much.
I used studicata and it helped a lot ! Only criticism is that he often stands in front of the board and you can’t see it 😅
These vids match with Contracts Farnsworth 8th edition perfectly. Thank you
🚨 SPECIAL OFFER: Want to crush law school finals, rack up scholarship $$$, pass the bar exam, and practice law like a BOSS? Take the LEAP. Get started today for free at: www.studicata.com/leap
Excellent video
The irrevocable offer exception for detrimental reliance is essentially primary estoppel, yes?
I love you man...
Question: Under an option contract to purchase land(consideration provided by rent/lease agreement), I reject the option to purchase the land… the next day(within the time frame provided), I say I accept… is the offer terminated even though it’s under an option contract?
In regards to constructive revocation, what if the offeree accepted and had not discovered the offeror had sold the marker to someone else? Is the offer still open so long as the offeree is not aware of the offerors actions?
Revocation has to be communicated either directly or indirectly with the offeree. If there is no communication, there is no revocation. However, the revocation can be indirectly communicated ONLY if the source is reliable. As in, an item that was offered to you by person A is sold to your neighbor and they tell oh wow I got a great day on xyz from person A. Even if you say wait they offered it to ME!!! It doesn’t matter, the revocation is now indirectly communicated, and the offer no longer exists. You can’t then go to person A and say YES I accept!! Hope that helped
What about destruction of property and supervening illegality?
Good question! Yes. Destruction of property and supervening illegality can terminate the offer if these acts occur before acceptance. However, once the offer is accepted, destruction of property and supervening illegality generally operate as excuses that can discharge a party's duty to perform under the contract. Notably, I plan to cover all of this is in greater detail when we get to our videos on performance.
How about the incapacitation for point 5 (in lieu of death)? Wouldn't that be an element that voids the offer?
Because insecurities aren't constructive
For Senate to defend their position in law against the narcissist, they have to get an attitude and be firm with the guys asking you to let them anyways. Jesus doesn't afford that attitude. Why? Because it's not the females job in honor.