I have been using the Hollyland Lark Max since launch and it has been great so far. Gonna be doing a review video on it soon too. Thank you for the heads-up on the sync issue but I probably won't have any issues with it as of now unless I have to shoot really long form video like long speeches or presentations, even then a slight cut in the audio during quiet periods will fix it. BTW, I have also tested it working as a portable recorder by plugging one of the TX modules into a mixing console via AUX out; worked great, didn't introduce or pick up any interference.
Awesome. I did manage to introduce some audio artifacts. With enough 2.4Ghz interference what happens it the audio quality drops and feels like the resolution drops giving that old school internet audio sound. It took a lot of devices, 4 of my RGB lights are all wifi & Bluetooth 2.4Ghz, my key light is 2.4Ghz wifi controlled, my phone enabled wifi and bluetooth, My computer has a wireless 2.4Ghz mouse and Keyboard, camera wireless remote is 2.4Ghz bluetooth and when it was close to the mic with everything going at the same time it reduced clarity without buzz or hum in the audio.
@@sparkestudio hehe... that is why I have been mostly using internal recording and only using camera audio out for quick turnaround stuff or streaming 😀
@@quagmire321able streaming... Did you get the headphone port to play PC Audio? I turned it off of mobile mode and I could choose it as an output device but I could not hear my game audio through it
@@quagmire321able I recorded to PC in this review while I compared to the Rode Wireless Go II. I just mean for hearing the audio from the PC. Like your game.
Wow, that is crazy. You're not the first comment saying about their Rode failing, in the other users case they had a different problem. You are the second commenter sharing this experience. I don't intend to really use the Rode Wireless II much, I mistakenly remove the one mic and had to re add it while testing. Was a bit annoying and a little too easy to happen by mistake. First time ever I mistakenly removed a mic by mistake on any wireless system, and I test A LOT of microphones.
Do you think you will get a service with Hollyland? In India, if i am not mistaken. I look at reviews on amazon and some failed after three months as well. People say there is no service. I don’t know if it is true or not. But i doubt on the service. Personally i will go with Dji more accessible and known in case of issues. And i can buy it in official retailer like Henry’s in Canada. So i get a point of service.
I actually tried it but didn't place it in the video. I will switch through the settings on part 2 that I am going to try to rush out in the next few days. I have a problem that I have been sent too many items for review and had problems with one of those items and need to repair it. Before I get part 2 out I have the Godox Virso M2 review to release. I am shocked by how good it is but also shocked to find that Fujifilm cameras have an audio alignment problem... Used 2 Fuji cameras and 2 Sony cameras to verify my findings
Thank you 🙌 finally a reviewer that actually reviews what we need! Can you do the hollyland vs the newer rode wireless mic pro with the lapel mic? I think retail is $499 on it.
And in case you didn't know I talk about the Rode Wireless Go on my latest video. The Rode Pro sounds the same as the Go II. But spec for spec the Hollyland does not have 32bit float so even with the best mic in the world if you shout loud the internal recording can clip, 32bit audio is very hard to clip.
@@heatherbroomhall The GO II and the Pro sound identical with the built in mic. I test the wired Rode Lavalier II here: ruclips.net/video/LlqP3mWOPn4/видео.htmlsi=-CVT0d20jBodzcqU And the Rode Lavalier II can not take loud volumes without distorting and the built in mic on the Rode Wireless isn't much better. 32Bit float is better for the reason I show in that video I linked above
Man, I really appreciate such thoughtful and thorough reviews like this. I don’t know about y’all but $300 is a lot of money and videos like this are confidence inspiring when it comes to shelling out my hard earned dough. One thing I would like to see is if the internal recording takes place whether the receiver is plugged in to a camera or not. Or is that only in “safety track” mode in the “REC mode” menu?
Thank you. All these internal recording mics that I reviewed so far work independently without the need for a receiver. without the reciever even if I set safety channel the internal recording came out even levels. I use Hollyland for movie making, I have my 2 channels but another creator came to me for video and audio and editing. The Hollyland Lark Max works great BUT I do not use the fur muffler ever. I tuck it in clothing, better sound quality that way. On my other channel I have a short video clip from one of the movies on my long term review of the Fujifilm X-S20 camera. I also found in a very crowded place with a lot of interference the audio quality drops off a bit, almost like an older RUclips video has lower audio quality. I reviewed a lot of microphones with internal recording on this channel. And I mean, a lot, spent way too much personal income 😅
Interesting. My Rode Wireless Go II failed after 3 months, 2 transmitters got locked onto the same channel somehow. After spending some time with Rode support, they asked me to send the mic back. While support was great and they sent me a new kit, it shook my confidence a bit and I sold it on eBay. This looks like a good alternative. Saying that, the DJI looks so slick with the more compact transmitters and smaller case.
Here is my experience with DJI... My honest review tested with lavaliers and everything just like this... If I am recording nature DJI all the way... if your room is not noise treated and you record in a studio or if you have vehicle traffic you'd regret such a choice, I know I did. First and only product I ever returned, wasn't worth the money. My DJI Mic review ruclips.net/video/256iYeeRuIc/видео.html I was notified that that on Iphone it only gets audio through one speaker to Apple lightning connection. You have to use the Type C connector and an apple lighting adapter with your phone in order to get left and right audio channel sound.
after sales service is probably nowhere visible with Hollyland. And the price is not budget. I would like to know if people have issues with it, can they get a service? I look on amazon reviews and it seems that my concerns could be justified.
I wrote Hollyland support before, one issue would be how slow they are to respond. If you want to know bad service you should check out Gigabyte and their cracked GPU PCB's being big on certain high end GPUs and they deny warranty. Asus and the huge issue of trying to charge customers for unrelated stuff. Gamers Nexus has done videos on both. Companies are getting away with ridiculous things these days. Back to Hollyland, the major issue I have seen is the units not turning off when placed in the charging case, it's not everyone but some people. For me an issue I had which I state on my part 2 long term experience video on the Lark Max is both mics turning on when the one only is removed BUT for me is fixed in the newest firmware. Sony, check out all the issues and complains and lack of support in the new cameras and what Sony has done with the latest firmware and the battery warning and how it knocks out peoples recordings. Tech companies are getting away with things they shouldn't and it's got stop or it'll only get worse.
Really appreciate this video. Very detailed with just the right amount of personality. I also like how you tell us about an aspect or feature of the equipment and then show the actual testing so someone can hear for themselves. Im not too keen on all the fluff and word salad where people are saying a lot yet telling or showing you nothing. In that case i can just save the time of watching the video and read a spec sheet myself. Hope your channel continues to grow. Will subscribe for sure
Thank you. I've started reviewing more studio equipment more recently as well. On my other channel it's more tech (half computer related) and not so much studio RUclipsr stuff.
Thanks for the check of locking thread mics, very useful. I'm wondering if my DPA 4066 mic (which has a locking thread mechanism on 3.5 the jack) will fully connect, meaning go all the way in. Any chance you have one you could check with? Any DPA with a 3.5 adapter should be the same. FYI It does work with the rode wireless GO systems.
I don't know how I'd check what you are asking... Right now I am attending technical training for my electrical certifications and am no longer in the studio. My Rode wireless devices are back at the studio and the only microphones I have with my is my Hollyland Lark Max (only wireless) I have a DPA thread lock adapter to XLR but that is also back at the studio and I have the Deity W.lav with microdot back at the studio but that one I did test with the Lark max with that microdot adapter and the DPA to XLR which both work. Other equipment I have with me is Zoom F3, Vocaster Two, Sennheiser MKE 600 and MKH 50 and Rode NTG 5. If you want to learn more about the Lark Max click on my channel name and videos and the last video I posted is part 2 video to the Lark Max.
Thanks for the quick reply@@sparketech . I perhaps was not clear in my question. Will a DPA with a 3.5 converter jack (a screw lock) fit into the Holyland Max transceiver?
@@kokyu I could not tell you the answer for certain... If it were a screw lock to 3.5mm it technically should work. The same screw lock to 3.5mm DA35 with microdot works if this is what sort of thing you are speaking of. You can always send a picture to me through my discord if you use discord. Either way I don't own the DPA adapter you are speaking of so I cannot specifically confirm... My discord link is in my video description. Don't have Discord? Facebook link is also in my video description and my email is in my about... Facebook link is where I post videos for both my channels. Tech and studio and you would also see some other content for the other channel and actor that I work with.
@@kokyu and DPA does not appear to force anyone into DPA devices for functionality. Oddly my edit didn't show up... If the headset requires power than it will not work with the Hollyland Lark Max. The manual appears to show 5 volts to 48 volts and shows XLR connection type.
Hmm if I understand right the DJI, X5, this and shotgun mics are not the best choice for indoor studio without sound treatment, right? If so, what would you recommend that doesn’t require external power and has 3.5mm (I don’t want to get into XLR, etc) for home studio use without sound treatment?
I discuss that in my other Sennheiser MKH50 review where I test several different options compared and end with what mic for what. This Hollyland isn't bad for an untreated room with the Environmental Noise Cancellation. It is one of the best options in an untreated room for a wireless microphone. The Deity v mic D4 I review here only $99 USD is a good affordable option. For the D4 in an untreated room speak with a distance from the wall and angle the mic just as I show to do in my review where I tested in an untreated room.
I use a Azden smx-30 mono/stereo it is very good inside/outside if you use your camera handheld. The mono shotgun remove some side sound. It gives accurate sound. It is bigger 145g and more comparable to a big rode but it has stereo and full range 40hz-20khz to record concerts and events. I don’t remember recording echo with it. It is a pro shotgun mono and pro 120 degrees stereo with +20/0/-10 gain, low cut filter, auto On/off, works with two batteries AA, it has foam studio and the windscreen fur as well, can be mounted on hot shoe or boompole 1/4-20. But on a gimbal i recommend a dji mic2 for the ability to balance easily your camera and no wire at all with the new Sony camera adapter hot shoe.
Each camera is different. My Sony ZV-1 I had odd audio issues at certain volumes. Generally having the camera lower volumes is best but there is a certain point that some microphones increase in self noise when the volume is increased. I now used the Sony A7C ii Just wait till I release my Viltrox lens review (holding it back until August 6th, too many reviews at the same time happening)
I only wish I knew something about the DJI Action 3. What I do know is that Lark Max is higher quality build that is more durable and has better quality of noise removal The Lark Max is 128 SPL and the Fulaim is likely to distort at lower volumes but I can at least shout with the Fulaim as well. Fulaim X5 is cheaper and also sounds better than the Rode Wireless. Fulaim has a short little adapter connector which for a small action cam "could" be something you want rather than a cable. Both have good audio, for internal audio the 24bit of the Lark Max is a better option which prevents audio hiss if the audio has to be boosted much. Lark Max has more reliable range as can be heard in the outside testing, especially around the same apartment outside test if that matters to you. "specific concerns" would be what can make the answer easier. Cost Benefit to you would be your answer. Fun Fact, the Fulaim and the Rode Wireless Me \ Go II uses the same fur muff. I literally tested this right now while writing.
@@EuroRSN Sennheiser MKE Essential OMNI lavalier. The Deity W.lav with DA35 is wonderful BUT it has some trouble staying in due to the lack of Locking port... Sadly the Rode Wireless Go ii or ME fit better and the Pro has a locking screw. Why the Sennheiser lavalier? Because the cord does not tangle, it has a good natural sound, very low self noise and you can shout extremely loud without it ever distorting.. the Rode lavalier II distorts quite easily due to the lack of SPL of the microphone.
@@EuroRSN I was lucky when I purchase the lavalier, I paid nearly half the price. Sadly I am not experienced in the affordable good lavalier side of things. And yes I purchased all of my wired lavaliers other than an extremely cheap one sent to me for review.
I have to re-watch this to see if I included the fact that device record level is changed by volume level of either the mics or the receiver if I remember correctly. Last I used this for recording a movie using internal audio I was clipping the internal recording from being too loud. I just released part 2 video one hour ago but I didn't retest that one aspect of internal record volume but I never ever under normal use had to boost anywhere beyond 20db unless you have your volume way down. On the DJI mic 25-30db boost was normal meaning DJI mic records more silent.
@@sparkestudio thanks I will try it. The tests were also without the cell phone. That is, only receiver and microphone using the internal recording and it sounds very very low.
@@criticactual try your internal recording and max out just the receiver volume. Next lower the reciever volume and raise the mic volume. The internal record volume if effected by the volume levels should auto adjust if effected by the set volume. I have no time to test. Mic is packed and most of my equipment is packed, I am moving and just finished yet another review video. Have a pile of videos to get done between this channel and my tech channel... Going to be a bit slow for time while attending year 4 of my electrical training. Have a great night.
Unless the mic is upgraded this time is the same blah audio with nice to have specs. The wireless Go II should have had the gain assist shouldn't have been wireless ME exclusive. And yes I reviewed the ME and purchased it out of pocket just like the GO II, just like the almost every mic I have ever tested. The pro adds 32bit float, which is great for those that somehow clip their internal audio from being too loud and it is very unlikely anyone would ever record with volumes too low to add hiss to 24bit audio. If the mic can't take the loud sound pressure (SPL) nothing is going to save it from distorted audio, not even 32bit float. There is zero audio quality improvement otherwise. Timecodes are great when making a movie to sync the audio between internal camera and recorded internal mic recording especially when recording with multiple mics. I've always synced by wave form but times codes organizes clutter of tracks of internal mic recording far easier. Being the "Pro" does cater to the pro spec wise and not the average, Joe. Basically for time codes your one side like the right (or left) side channel is destroyed with time code to align the 32but float time code personally have zero need for the wireless pro and neither do most RUclipsrs but the mic quality has always been just "ok". Useful tool for the pro, yes it does a fine job of replacing the tentacle track E, which I personally have zero to use for. For my 32bit float I use the Zoom F3 field recorder, mostly when out in the middle of nowhere cause it is small and can be used to power my actual pro level microphones. Sennheiser MKH50 a $1200 mic I can take outside with me on the go. The Rode Wireless Pro is likely till I find out otherwise a Wireless GO II and ME painted with nice specs. So to sum this up the Pro needs to have a better microphone or it just sounds like the same "it's okay".
The point of that long message was "don't fall for the hype". I started buying mics to review because of how upset reviewers made me not being fully honest but hyping to make you buy from their affiliate links. If the reviewers aren't fully honest the companies send you more to review unless they seek out an honest Reviewer to show that their product actually is better. The GO II was also great for not being disturbed be interference and the longer range is not internal audio but is a nice to have for someone that does not plan to use internal audio.
So much "hype" but that's what it is ruclips.net/video/xB3A4344WUM/видео.htmlsi=Uwwo3iglozM217dX Fall for the hype you spend stupid money for nothing. 32bit float internal recording good on Rode for going all out. Timecodes this looks to only be good for one camera almost all programs line up audio by wave form. Sadly I am sick from co workers coming in sick or I would give my take on this. These specs are impressive from a going all out point of view but the DJI mic still sounds way better than a mic that has a slight nasal tone to it. Also keep in mind up to 7hours of battery life... Minus how much battery life is lost thru the internal recording and maybe we get 4.5 hours of battery life. I heard Rodes actual testing video. It sounds like it always sounded... Okay, not premium.
You're having issues even with the fur muffs on? In my long term experience video I used this without the fur muffs and show where I hide the mics. I place them within clothing.
@@Hikingjoe383 volume levels don't help with wind noise BUT there are your 3 audio settings HD, vocal boost and low cut. low cut reduces wind noise. The ENC reduces audio clarity so I would recommend against it.... This is my long term experience video ruclips.net/video/4AxPzvVp_64/видео.htmlsi=_BD1R2Q93L0BFcyj 5 minutes and 45 seconds in I show where I placed the mic on the talent to voice wind noise.
@sparkestudio thank you so much I understand now where to place the mic. Im sorry im new to this and maybe not fully clued in mic what should it be set to ? Then the gain volume settings wht would be best ?
@@Hikingjoe383 Best volume levels is partly personal choice. I show in my review what happens when you turn up just the mic and the receiver BUT I never recommend max on anything since that would introduce more hiss. For recording look that none of your levels are clipping to the device looking at the receiver and the camera. Camera input volume levels should always be set low to avoid hiss. My Sony ZV1 I had at 1 out of 30 volume gave me the best sound quality but often was 5 out of 30. On my current Fujifilm X-S20 I always use -30Db lowest possible volume on the camera. However I almost exclusively use the Tascam on camera audio interface since it's simply superior audio to camera mic in. If you used the Tascam on camera interface you set the Tascam ATT to -20Db.
This is one hell of a audio test and comparison. Excellent work bro👊😉
Thank you very much
The best test of this mic I have seen so far, especially combined with the long term experience video you did.
Hi I really appreciate your struggle to create this video. Such a tremendous Video. So many tests wow.
Thank you very much
This is the best Video about the Lark Max on YT
I have been using the Hollyland Lark Max since launch and it has been great so far. Gonna be doing a review video on it soon too. Thank you for the heads-up on the sync issue but I probably won't have any issues with it as of now unless I have to shoot really long form video like long speeches or presentations, even then a slight cut in the audio during quiet periods will fix it. BTW, I have also tested it working as a portable recorder by plugging one of the TX modules into a mixing console via AUX out; worked great, didn't introduce or pick up any interference.
Awesome. I did manage to introduce some audio artifacts. With enough 2.4Ghz interference what happens it the audio quality drops and feels like the resolution drops giving that old school internet audio sound. It took a lot of devices, 4 of my RGB lights are all wifi & Bluetooth 2.4Ghz, my key light is 2.4Ghz wifi controlled, my phone enabled wifi and bluetooth, My computer has a wireless 2.4Ghz mouse and Keyboard, camera wireless remote is 2.4Ghz bluetooth and when it was close to the mic with everything going at the same time it reduced clarity without buzz or hum in the audio.
@@sparkestudio hehe... that is why I have been mostly using internal recording and only using camera audio out for quick turnaround stuff or streaming 😀
@@quagmire321able streaming... Did you get the headphone port to play PC Audio? I turned it off of mobile mode and I could choose it as an output device but I could not hear my game audio through it
@@sparkestudio I used USB C for PC connection; works fine as a USB C microphone
@@quagmire321able I recorded to PC in this review while I compared to the Rode Wireless Go II. I just mean for hearing the audio from the PC. Like your game.
My Rode Wireless Go II stopped working after updates.. I'm just going to buy this.
Wow, that is crazy. You're not the first comment saying about their Rode failing, in the other users case they had a different problem. You are the second commenter sharing this experience. I don't intend to really use the Rode Wireless II much, I mistakenly remove the one mic and had to re add it while testing. Was a bit annoying and a little too easy to happen by mistake. First time ever I mistakenly removed a mic by mistake on any wireless system, and I test A LOT of microphones.
Do you think you will get a service with Hollyland? In India, if i am not mistaken. I look at reviews on amazon and some failed after three months as well. People say there is no service. I don’t know if it is true or not. But i doubt on the service. Personally i will go with Dji more accessible and known in case of issues. And i can buy it in official retailer like Henry’s in Canada. So i get a point of service.
I'd be curious to see how the vocal boost feature sounds with the Lark. Nice review.
I actually tried it but didn't place it in the video. I will switch through the settings on part 2 that I am going to try to rush out in the next few days. I have a problem that I have been sent too many items for review and had problems with one of those items and need to repair it.
Before I get part 2 out I have the Godox Virso M2 review to release. I am shocked by how good it is but also shocked to find that Fujifilm cameras have an audio alignment problem... Used 2 Fuji cameras and 2 Sony cameras to verify my findings
This is the review I'm looking for 👍👍
Thank you 🙌 finally a reviewer that actually reviews what we need! Can you do the hollyland vs the newer rode wireless mic pro with the lapel mic? I think retail is $499 on it.
And in case you didn't know I talk about the Rode Wireless Go on my latest video. The Rode Pro sounds the same as the Go II. But spec for spec the Hollyland does not have 32bit float so even with the best mic in the world if you shout loud the internal recording can clip, 32bit audio is very hard to clip.
Great thank you! Is that with a lapel mic plugged in that it sounds the same as the go ii?
@@heatherbroomhall The GO II and the Pro sound identical with the built in mic.
I test the wired Rode Lavalier II here: ruclips.net/video/LlqP3mWOPn4/видео.htmlsi=-CVT0d20jBodzcqU
And the Rode Lavalier II can not take loud volumes without distorting and the built in mic on the Rode Wireless isn't much better. 32Bit float is better for the reason I show in that video I linked above
Man, I really appreciate such thoughtful and thorough reviews like this. I don’t know about y’all but $300 is a lot of money and videos like this are confidence inspiring when it comes to shelling out my hard earned dough. One thing I would like to see is if the internal recording takes place whether the receiver is plugged in to a camera or not. Or is that only in “safety track” mode in the “REC mode” menu?
Thank you. All these internal recording mics that I reviewed so far work independently without the need for a receiver. without the reciever even if I set safety channel the internal recording came out even levels. I use Hollyland for movie making, I have my 2 channels but another creator came to me for video and audio and editing. The Hollyland Lark Max works great BUT I do not use the fur muffler ever. I tuck it in clothing, better sound quality that way. On my other channel I have a short video clip from one of the movies on my long term review of the Fujifilm X-S20 camera. I also found in a very crowded place with a lot of interference the audio quality drops off a bit, almost like an older RUclips video has lower audio quality. I reviewed a lot of microphones with internal recording on this channel. And I mean, a lot, spent way too much personal income 😅
Interesting. My Rode Wireless Go II failed after 3 months, 2 transmitters got locked onto the same channel somehow. After spending some time with Rode support, they asked me to send the mic back. While support was great and they sent me a new kit, it shook my confidence a bit and I sold it on eBay. This looks like a good alternative. Saying that, the DJI looks so slick with the more compact transmitters and smaller case.
Here is my experience with DJI... My honest review tested with lavaliers and everything just like this... If I am recording nature DJI all the way... if your room is not noise treated and you record in a studio or if you have vehicle traffic you'd regret such a choice, I know I did. First and only product I ever returned, wasn't worth the money.
My DJI Mic review
ruclips.net/video/256iYeeRuIc/видео.html
I was notified that that on Iphone it only gets audio through one speaker to Apple lightning connection. You have to use the Type C connector and an apple lighting adapter with your phone in order to get left and right audio channel sound.
after sales service is probably nowhere visible with Hollyland. And the price is not budget. I would like to know if people have issues with it, can they get a service? I look on amazon reviews and it seems that my concerns could be justified.
I wrote Hollyland support before, one issue would be how slow they are to respond. If you want to know bad service you should check out Gigabyte and their cracked GPU PCB's being big on certain high end GPUs and they deny warranty. Asus and the huge issue of trying to charge customers for unrelated stuff. Gamers Nexus has done videos on both. Companies are getting away with ridiculous things these days.
Back to Hollyland, the major issue I have seen is the units not turning off when placed in the charging case, it's not everyone but some people. For me an issue I had which I state on my part 2 long term experience video on the Lark Max is both mics turning on when the one only is removed BUT for me is fixed in the newest firmware.
Sony, check out all the issues and complains and lack of support in the new cameras and what Sony has done with the latest firmware and the battery warning and how it knocks out peoples recordings. Tech companies are getting away with things they shouldn't and it's got stop or it'll only get worse.
Really appreciate this video. Very detailed with just the right amount of personality. I also like how you tell us about an aspect or feature of the equipment and then show the actual testing so someone can hear for themselves. Im not too keen on all the fluff and word salad where people are saying a lot yet telling or showing you nothing. In that case i can just save the time of watching the video and read a spec sheet myself. Hope your channel continues to grow. Will subscribe for sure
Thank you. I've started reviewing more studio equipment more recently as well. On my other channel it's more tech (half computer related) and not so much studio RUclipsr stuff.
Thanks for the check of locking thread mics, very useful. I'm wondering if my DPA 4066 mic (which has a locking thread mechanism on 3.5 the jack) will fully connect, meaning go all the way in. Any chance you have one you could check with? Any DPA with a 3.5 adapter should be the same. FYI It does work with the rode wireless GO systems.
I don't know how I'd check what you are asking... Right now I am attending technical training for my electrical certifications and am no longer in the studio. My Rode wireless devices are back at the studio and the only microphones I have with my is my Hollyland Lark Max (only wireless) I have a DPA thread lock adapter to XLR but that is also back at the studio and I have the Deity W.lav with microdot back at the studio but that one I did test with the Lark max with that microdot adapter and the DPA to XLR which both work. Other equipment I have with me is Zoom F3, Vocaster Two, Sennheiser MKE 600 and MKH 50 and Rode NTG 5. If you want to learn more about the Lark Max click on my channel name and videos and the last video I posted is part 2 video to the Lark Max.
Thanks for the quick reply@@sparketech . I perhaps was not clear in my question. Will a DPA with a 3.5 converter jack (a screw lock) fit into the Holyland Max transceiver?
@@kokyu I could not tell you the answer for certain... If it were a screw lock to 3.5mm it technically should work. The same screw lock to 3.5mm DA35 with microdot works if this is what sort of thing you are speaking of. You can always send a picture to me through my discord if you use discord. Either way I don't own the DPA adapter you are speaking of so I cannot specifically confirm... My discord link is in my video description. Don't have Discord? Facebook link is also in my video description and my email is in my about... Facebook link is where I post videos for both my channels. Tech and studio and you would also see some other content for the other channel and actor that I work with.
@@kokyu and DPA does not appear to force anyone into DPA devices for functionality. Oddly my edit didn't show up... If the headset requires power than it will not work with the Hollyland Lark Max. The manual appears to show 5 volts to 48 volts and shows XLR connection type.
Thanks again I watched your part 2 review also great content@@sparkestudio
Hmm if I understand right the DJI, X5, this and shotgun mics are not the best choice for indoor studio without sound treatment, right? If so, what would you recommend that doesn’t require external power and has 3.5mm (I don’t want to get into XLR, etc) for home studio use without sound treatment?
I discuss that in my other Sennheiser MKH50 review where I test several different options compared and end with what mic for what.
This Hollyland isn't bad for an untreated room with the Environmental Noise Cancellation. It is one of the best options in an untreated room for a wireless microphone. The Deity v mic D4 I review here only $99 USD is a good affordable option. For the D4 in an untreated room speak with a distance from the wall and angle the mic just as I show to do in my review where I tested in an untreated room.
I use a Azden smx-30 mono/stereo it is very good inside/outside if you use your camera handheld. The mono shotgun remove some side sound. It gives accurate sound. It is bigger 145g and more comparable to a big rode but it has stereo and full range 40hz-20khz to record concerts and events. I don’t remember recording echo with it. It is a pro shotgun mono and pro 120 degrees stereo with +20/0/-10 gain, low cut filter, auto On/off, works with two batteries AA, it has foam studio and the windscreen fur as well, can be mounted on hot shoe or boompole 1/4-20.
But on a gimbal i recommend a dji mic2 for the ability to balance easily your camera and no wire at all with the new Sony camera adapter hot shoe.
So you have it on +3 for the Camera? I have a Sony ZV-E10
Each camera is different. My Sony ZV-1 I had odd audio issues at certain volumes. Generally having the camera lower volumes is best but there is a certain point that some microphones increase in self noise when the volume is increased.
I now used the Sony A7C ii
Just wait till I release my Viltrox lens review (holding it back until August 6th, too many reviews at the same time happening)
I have a long term experience video for even more real world use
ruclips.net/video/4AxPzvVp_64/видео.htmlsi
Would recommend those or the Fulaim X5 for the DJI action 3 ?
I only wish I knew something about the DJI Action 3.
What I do know is that Lark Max is higher quality build that is more durable and has better quality of noise removal
The Lark Max is 128 SPL and the Fulaim is likely to distort at lower volumes but I can at least shout with the Fulaim as well.
Fulaim X5 is cheaper and also sounds better than the Rode Wireless. Fulaim has a short little adapter connector which for a small action cam "could" be something you want rather than a cable. Both have good audio, for internal audio the 24bit of the Lark Max is a better option which prevents audio hiss if the audio has to be boosted much.
Lark Max has more reliable range as can be heard in the outside testing, especially around the same apartment outside test if that matters to you.
"specific concerns" would be what can make the answer easier. Cost Benefit to you would be your answer.
Fun Fact, the Fulaim and the Rode Wireless Me \ Go II uses the same fur muff. I literally tested this right now while writing.
@@sparkestudio thanks !
Which lav would you recommend for this?
@@EuroRSN Sennheiser MKE Essential OMNI lavalier. The Deity W.lav with DA35 is wonderful BUT it has some trouble staying in due to the lack of Locking port... Sadly the Rode Wireless Go ii or ME fit better and the Pro has a locking screw. Why the Sennheiser lavalier? Because the cord does not tangle, it has a good natural sound, very low self noise and you can shout extremely loud without it ever distorting.. the Rode lavalier II distorts quite easily due to the lack of SPL of the microphone.
@@sparkestudioahhh too bad this lav costs more than the entire Lark Max system lol. Not going to work for most people on a budget.
@@EuroRSN I was lucky when I purchase the lavalier, I paid nearly half the price. Sadly I am not experienced in the affordable good lavalier side of things. And yes I purchased all of my wired lavaliers other than an extremely cheap one sent to me for review.
@@EuroRSN Oh wow the price went up by about 50% since I purchased.
Hi! I have Max and i need +40 dB to listen!
The record is too low
I have to re-watch this to see if I included the fact that device record level is changed by volume level of either the mics or the receiver if I remember correctly. Last I used this for recording a movie using internal audio I was clipping the internal recording from being too loud. I just released part 2 video one hour ago but I didn't retest that one aspect of internal record volume but I never ever under normal use had to boost anywhere beyond 20db unless you have your volume way down. On the DJI mic 25-30db boost was normal meaning DJI mic records more silent.
@@sparkestudio thanks I will try it. The tests were also without the cell phone. That is, only receiver and microphone using the internal recording and it sounds very very low.
@@criticactual try your internal recording and max out just the receiver volume. Next lower the reciever volume and raise the mic volume. The internal record volume if effected by the volume levels should auto adjust if effected by the set volume. I have no time to test. Mic is packed and most of my equipment is packed, I am moving and just finished yet another review video. Have a pile of videos to get done between this channel and my tech channel... Going to be a bit slow for time while attending year 4 of my electrical training. Have a great night.
@@sparkestudio okay I'll try it. I didn't know there was "receiver volume"
I've only been manipulating the gain of the external mic.
rode wireless pro is out in 1 week ... lets compare then great video though
Unless the mic is upgraded this time is the same blah audio with nice to have specs. The wireless Go II should have had the gain assist shouldn't have been wireless ME exclusive. And yes I reviewed the ME and purchased it out of pocket just like the GO II, just like the almost every mic I have ever tested. The pro adds 32bit float, which is great for those that somehow clip their internal audio from being too loud and it is very unlikely anyone would ever record with volumes too low to add hiss to 24bit audio. If the mic can't take the loud sound pressure (SPL) nothing is going to save it from distorted audio, not even 32bit float. There is zero audio quality improvement otherwise. Timecodes are great when making a movie to sync the audio between internal camera and recorded internal mic recording especially when recording with multiple mics. I've always synced by wave form but times codes organizes clutter of tracks of internal mic recording far easier. Being the "Pro" does cater to the pro spec wise and not the average, Joe. Basically for time codes your one side like the right (or left) side channel is destroyed with time code to align the 32but float time code personally have zero need for the wireless pro and neither do most RUclipsrs but the mic quality has always been just "ok". Useful tool for the pro, yes it does a fine job of replacing the tentacle track E, which I personally have zero to use for. For my 32bit float I use the Zoom F3 field recorder, mostly when out in the middle of nowhere cause it is small and can be used to power my actual pro level microphones. Sennheiser MKH50 a $1200 mic I can take outside with me on the go. The Rode Wireless Pro is likely till I find out otherwise a Wireless GO II and ME painted with nice specs. So to sum this up the Pro needs to have a better microphone or it just sounds like the same "it's okay".
The point of that long message was "don't fall for the hype". I started buying mics to review because of how upset reviewers made me not being fully honest but hyping to make you buy from their affiliate links. If the reviewers aren't fully honest the companies send you more to review unless they seek out an honest Reviewer to show that their product actually is better. The GO II was also great for not being disturbed be interference and the longer range is not internal audio but is a nice to have for someone that does not plan to use internal audio.
So much "hype" but that's what it is
ruclips.net/video/xB3A4344WUM/видео.htmlsi=Uwwo3iglozM217dX
Fall for the hype you spend stupid money for nothing. 32bit float internal recording good on Rode for going all out. Timecodes this looks to only be good for one camera almost all programs line up audio by wave form. Sadly I am sick from co workers coming in sick or I would give my take on this. These specs are impressive from a going all out point of view but the DJI mic still sounds way better than a mic that has a slight nasal tone to it. Also keep in mind up to 7hours of battery life... Minus how much battery life is lost thru the internal recording and maybe we get 4.5 hours of battery life. I heard Rodes actual testing video. It sounds like it always sounded... Okay, not premium.
Cheers, subbed.
I have one of these I'm struggling with wind noise and unsure of what's the best settings tbh it's my first mic?
Anyone help
You're having issues even with the fur muffs on? In my long term experience video I used this without the fur muffs and show where I hide the mics. I place them within clothing.
@sparkestudio
And these are the settings I'm using below
So output is -5 and mic gain is -6 and the wind reduction is on green aswell.
Thanks joe
@@Hikingjoe383 volume levels don't help with wind noise BUT there are your 3 audio settings HD, vocal boost and low cut. low cut reduces wind noise. The ENC reduces audio clarity so I would recommend against it.... This is my long term experience video
ruclips.net/video/4AxPzvVp_64/видео.htmlsi=_BD1R2Q93L0BFcyj
5 minutes and 45 seconds in I show where I placed the mic on the talent to voice wind noise.
@sparkestudio thank you so much I understand now where to place the mic.
Im sorry im new to this and maybe not fully clued in mic what should it be set to ? Then the gain volume settings wht would be best ?
@@Hikingjoe383 Best volume levels is partly personal choice. I show in my review what happens when you turn up just the mic and the receiver BUT I never recommend max on anything since that would introduce more hiss. For recording look that none of your levels are clipping to the device looking at the receiver and the camera. Camera input volume levels should always be set low to avoid hiss. My Sony ZV1 I had at 1 out of 30 volume gave me the best sound quality but often was 5 out of 30. On my current Fujifilm X-S20 I always use -30Db lowest possible volume on the camera. However I almost exclusively use the Tascam on camera audio interface since it's simply superior audio to camera mic in. If you used the Tascam on camera interface you set the Tascam ATT to -20Db.