That's a curious choice of terminology, where is it from? I've only ever heard the term "normal-form game" used synonymously to strategic-form i.e. games represented by functions from a set of strategy profiles to payoffs (sometimes denoted as a matrix).
Another way to put describe matrix vs. normal is that the matrix is a particular representation of the normal form. Sometimes the matrix representation is elegant; other times no so much. I believe the terms originated with Von Neumann and Morgenstern.
That's a curious choice of terminology, where is it from?
I've only ever heard the term "normal-form game" used synonymously to strategic-form i.e. games represented by functions from a set of strategy profiles to payoffs (sometimes denoted as a matrix).
Another way to put describe matrix vs. normal is that the matrix is a particular representation of the normal form. Sometimes the matrix representation is elegant; other times no so much. I believe the terms originated with Von Neumann and Morgenstern.
@@naomiutgoff oh, i see what you mean, thanks
shouldn't be 130-q1-q2?
Yes: 130 - Q = 130 - (q1 + q2) = 130 - q1 - q2.