'The Patriarchy Works!' Jason Whitlock Debates the 19th Amendment | Ep 48
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 авг 2024
- Jason Whitlock, host of "Fearless" on Blaze Media, joins James Poulos to discuss why he wades into the "repeal the 19th Amendment" debate and why he believes “the patriarchy actually works.” They discuss his proposal for a reformed amendment that allows families to vote instead of single persons. Pro golfer Scottie Scheffler broke news by getting arrested prior to the second round of the PGA Championship. In other sports news, Harrison Butker from the Kansas City Chiefs gave a commencement speech at Benedictine College, where he praised stay-at-home moms and homemakers. Nikola Jokic and Caitlin Clark are blowing up the NBA and WNBA, while Tom Brady’s roast took mainstream media by storm, featuring brutal roasts from Nikki Glaser and Kim Kardashian. What does this mean for the future of sports? Will sports professionals be able to express their personal opinions without fear of cancellation? Or will we be able to separate the art from the artist?
"Fearless with Jason Whitlock" is excited to announce Fearless Army Roll Call 2.0! Mark your calendar for Saturday, June 1, 2024, and join us at Rocketown in Nashville, Tennessee. Visit FearlessArmyRollCall.com to learn more and reserve your spot. This gathering will fill up fast.
► Watch MORE BlazeTV RUclips Videos: bit.ly/3EVRJHP
► Join BlazeTV and Watch LIVE Shows Daily! get.blazetv.com/
► Visit the 'Blaze News' Website (No Annoying Ads!): www.theblaze.com/
► Sign-Up for our NEWSLETTER: www.theblaze.c...
Connect with us on Social Media:
x.com/TheBlaze
x.com/BlazeTV
/ theblazetv
/ blazemedia
#blazemedia #blazetv #theblaze #jamespoulos #zerohour #zerohourpodcast #jasonwhitlock #fearless #fearlessjasonwhitlock
Voting should have nothing to do with sex. It should be limited to those who have real skin in the game. Military, veterans, and net taxpayers. If you have served this country in uniform you have skin in the game. If you are paying money to support the country you have skin in the game. If you get back every dollar you pay in taxes, or collect more benefits than the taxes you pay, you are not a net contributor and should not be making decisions that affect the country.
This does not negate the fact that women cannot enforce their own rights. They have to rely on men to do this for them. They're also nowhere near as useful when serving in the military. The bottom line is that they will never stand equal with men, and there is no way around that. So why on earth should their vote count as much.
*"Success depends on the actions or steps you take to achieve it. Building wealth involves developing good habits, such as regularly setting aside money for sound investments."* ...heard this from a friend
She's a top notch for real, my colleagues at work kept talking about her, so I decided to take the test and work with her; she's put a smile on my face for the past few years of working with her😊
I took a look at your advisor and she looks quite the part, I have always thought advisors overrated but taking a look at yours she gives off some confidence, might as well see what advice she has for me.
Tonya demonstrates an excellent understanding of market trends, making well informed decisions that leads to consistent profit.
Some persons think inves'tin is all about buying stocks; I think going into the stock market without a good experience is a big risk, that's why I'm lucky to have seen someone like mrs tonya.
*ExpertEvans*
If voting mattered they would not allow you to do it
It did matter, when you knew your neighbors, as well as the rest of the town's business. Big cities and the internet corrupted the body politic.
@@stephen-ng
Two party system, funded by the same people, where they carry out their donors wishes instead of for the good of the people.
Stop being so naive.
FYI the media have always been used to control you.
If you take away my right to vote, am I exempt from taxation? What about taxation without representation?
Cool domestic labor is untaxed, we 100% agree
@@robertwarner1160
My late husband’s military (25 years USMC) pension and Social Security is taxed as are my earnings as an artist, teacher, and author. But I will gladly take that $15k a year back, in addition to what I pay on property taxes and sales taxes.
Please explain to me what good allowing you women in the workforce has done. You shouldn't be taxed at all because you shouldn't be working.
@@pokiejackson3364
Okay. Do I still have to pay on my widow’s benefits, or am I not allowed to have those?
Who is going to support all of the girls whose fathers have disappeared? Who is going to support all the women without husbands, fathers, or other male relatives?
Your idea is potentially interesting; you need to flesh it out a bit, though.
@@pokiejackson3364 beat me to it lol
Urgent emergency please join me in prayer for all those affected families children animals massive tornadoes destruction in Michigan Texas Iowa Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Arkansas Oklahoma many states They desperately need your prayers please pray for them God bless you all
When California has a natural disaster, we are told that it was the wrath of the Almighty. I wonder what those unfortunate folks have done to upset Him?
@@AdaraBalabustaincorrect, when those disasters happen in California you are either told that you’re corrupt government won’t control the forests for woke climate occult reasons… or tectonic plates shifted as they tend to do. Quit looking for false equivalence where it doesn’t exist.
We have an old friend who lost his entire farm in Oklahoma. They are safe and their cows are fine. Just pray.
Thoughts and prayers🙏❤️🙏
Only tax payers should vote.
That would reduce a bigger chunk of women than men but if a woman pays taxes and doesn't live off the system I'm fine with her voting.
Yep... it guarantees that they have "skin in the game".
@@OldSaltyBear Being forced to sign up for selective service is plenty enough "skin in the game". And it's also why women should not be allowed to vote.
I have no problem with any citizen voting, as long as they own property.
NO!! Stop letting us vote! We vote with emotions; it's ending badly!!!!
well im fine letting women vote but they need to be drafted first... no draft, no vote...
@@lisafoodie8443 That's a step in the right direction, but it still doesn't negate the fact that women are far less useless in a military setting than men. So the risk / work factor would still be out of balance. No matter how you spin it, you're never going to be equal and therefore your vote shouldn't count as much as a man.
No they should not. Period. And gynogynists can call me a misogynist until the cows come home, don't care.
I am a woman....an now that I have woken up to the swamp...I know that I could vote properly now but not before.....so no...women can discuss the matter with their husbands and let them vote
Why just their husband's? Talk to your community, or google. Every thing you need to know is at our finger tips
@@nonakabyrd5759 Google? No...Community? Families? Sure
Well my husband of 16 years just ran off with a 20 year old and abandoned me and his children. Many of these men are POS. I Do NOT want them dictating my life.
How Handmaid's Tale of you.
@@nonakabyrd5759Google is marxist. Lol
You're asking the wrong question. Should citizens who do not pay taxes be allowed to vote?
It absolutely is a valid question. You women cannot enforce your own rights. You have to rely on men to do this for you. All the freedoms you have in this world exist solely through the benevolence of men. As a result of this reality, you are not equal to a man and therefore your vote should not count as much. It probably shouldn't count at all. No amount of taxes will ever change the fact that you are not equal to a man.
That would be unfair to the elderly who are living on nothing but Social Security because life didn’t go well for them.
I think everyone should have to pass a test. Like knowing local and federal politicians. If you don't know who Speaker of the house and what they do. Nope,
Man or woman black white shouldn't be able to vote unless they are aware enough of our government offices😊
You cannot enforce your own rights. You have to rely on men to do this for you. All the freedoms you have in this country, exist solely through the benevolence of men. As a result of this reality, you are not equal to a man, and therefore your vote should not count as much. It probably shouldn't count at all.
agree in principle. problem is, who creates the test?
therein lies the rub.
i bet big money some intellectual psycho weirdo in an ivory tower somewhere would create it, hence making the "correct" answers nonsensical and overall impossible to pass by common sense conservatives.
I know we still have 5 hours, but I wanted to say that I'll happily give up my right to vote to stop ppl like AOC and jasmine crockett from voting
That's insane.
Absolutely not. Also - a huge problem is that the people vote for senators. This is not what the framers had in place. The state legislature needs to put the federal senators in place. Also the house is limited now. It was supposed to get larger with the population. Put all that back and you have fabulous conservative leaning gridlock which is absolutely what we want for the Federal govt.
As a woman if I were not allowed to vote, then my income shouldn’t be taxed.
You cannot enforce your own rights. You have to rely on men to do this for you. All the freedoms you have in this world, exist solely through the benevolence of men. As a result of this reality, you are not equal to a man and therefore your vote should not count as much. It probably shouldn't count at all. No amount of taxes will ever change the fact that you are not equal to a man.
If you are a net tax payer and registered for selective service between the ages of 18 and 26, then I have no problem with you voting. If not, then you should not be eligible to because you have no vested interest in our society.
As a female I am proud to have voted in 11 Presidential elections (since Ford/Carter)....and have NEVER, EVER voted for a single Democrat.
Me, either. I voted for the late Bill Orton for Congress in Utah because the Republican running said that families in which the father was dead weren’t families any longer. Bill is the only Democrat I ever supported, iirc.
I’ve never voted for a democrat, but did vote for Ron Paul and Ross Perot. Republicans aren’t usually the answer either ( agree no democrat since Kennedy was good).
I voted since 1972 and never for a democrap
Well there you go. Sorry but the two bush presidents did more damage to this country so dont see half the problem see it all. Bush sr opened the boarder and sighned china into world trade organizations creating our next military rival for military cooperation
I say we keep letting women vote, but they immediately have to sign up for selected services just like men do. We can’t keep giving these “special“ groups privileges without accountability.
I can agree with that as a woman. Israel has a very successful female army
@@nonakabyrd5759 fantastic! Maybe they can show our women a thing or two seeing how not a single woman has passed the US Ranger qualification training or Navy SEALs training without the bar being set dramatically lower for them.
@@nonakabyrd5759 fantastic! Maybe they can show our women a thing or two seeing how not a single woman has passed the US Ranger qualification training or Navy SEALs training without the bar being set dramatically lower for them.
The problem with that idea is that it still doesn't make them equal to men. You can draft them, but they still won't be able to carry as much water. No matter how you skin it, they're not equal, and they never will be. So why on earth should their vote count as much as mine?
@@stuarts5301
Your comment is a non sequitur.
If you don’t file a tax return, you should NOT vote!!! Property owners only should vote on property tax levies!!!
To answer the question, no‼️And while we’re at it get women out of politics 💥
And the judicial system.
Short answer: no
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooo.
Only net taxpayers should be allowed to vote.
I do not personally know one woman that keeps up and or understands the big issues that affect us generationally.
They vote emotionally and with the latest narrative presented. I hate to say it but, NO, the largest majority should not vote.
I’m a 45 year old woman and started listening to Rush Limbaugh in the 6th grade, because of my mother. I registered to vote on my own once I turned 18. Some of us have been informed more than most citizens; male or female.
@@ricipreuit3259 Doesn't matter.... You cannot enforce your own rights. You have to rely on men to do this for you. All the freedoms you have in this world exist solely through the benevolence of men. As a result of this reality, females are inherently unequal to men, and therefore your vote should not count as much. It probably shouldn't count at all. Not to mention that none of you were forced to sign up for selective service in order to vote. That fact alone invalidates your point. Your "equality" is nothing more than a delusion that men are currently allowing.
@@ricipreuit3259
I said the largest majority.
Not all women.
That same argument could be presented concerning men also.
The family unit has been seriously degraded that they don’t have proper values.
I dare the View to invite Jason on their show! All of their questions are scripted and Jason would leave them speechless which is a very good thing!
This is such a stupid question.. of course women should be allowed to Vote! But i do agree with someone who commented saying, "everyone should be taken a test before Voting," at least to know that we know whats currently going on.
You cannot enforce your own rights. You have to rely on men to do this for you. All the freedoms you have in this world exist solely through the benevolence of men. As a result of this reality, females are inherently unequal to men, and therefore your vote should not count as much. It probably shouldn't count at all. Not to mention that none of you were forced to sign up for selective service in order to vote. That fact alone invalidates all of your arguments.
Are you crazy!! I will absolutely be able to vote. I run my life, not a man. And I don’t run a man’s life. Men are great but I’m my own boss.
Enjoy taking that to your death bed all alone miss boss lady
Enjoy your cats and boxed wine, Queen!
I could ask "How's that working out for you?"...you'd probably say 'great'. Then I'd ask those in your immediate circle (friends and family)...they might see things differently
The only reason you have any rights at all, is because men are currently allowing you to have them. If, at some point in the future, men decide that you no longer deserve to have those rights, then there's absolutely nothing you'll be able to do about it. All of your freedoms are solely reliant on the benevolence of men. If you believe otherwise, then you are delusional, which seems to be a shockingly common trait among you "modern" females.
😂
They did mess up when wording the 19th amendment.
Simply stating that Human Citizens have rights, and leaving it at that.
Question: are you a Citizen? Then you are protected equally under the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
No "special" carve-outs or laws needed for thousands of small differences that all Humans have.
People are petty
@@nonakabyrd5759
The founding of America upset the "Normal" way of running a Country or Kingdom.
Allowing the Citizens to "self rule" and writing a Constitution to LIMIT the power of Government over the freedoms of people upset a lot of systems that were built through the oppression of peasants.
Imagine the notion of "ALL men (implied all humans) are Created Equal"
The "Devine authority" of the King would be directly insulted.
Some people have been so conditioned to be "taken care of" they willingly abandon freedoms for the hollow promise of the Nation taking care of their every need.
When we treat ourselves with respect and respect others as humans, and cast aside "labels" of some meaningless demographic identity, perhaps we can coexist peacefully.
Just stopped in to say hello no... Have a nice day
Yes... Women should be allowed to vote. A voting license, everyone passing a free online course may vote. Education matters 💯
That makes sense.
You are incorrect. You cannot enforce your own rights. You have to rely on men to do this for you. All the freedoms you have in this world exist solely through the benevolence of men. As a result of this reality, females are inherently unequal to men, and therefore your vote should not count as much. It probably shouldn't count at all. Not to mention that none of you were forced to sign up for selective service in order to vote. That fact alone invalidates your argument. Your "equality" is nothing more than a delusion that men are currently allowing.
No women should not vote or be public office this the reason our nation is over letting foolish women voting
Women worked tirelessly, to keep our country safe during the war.
They should have worked to keep their families together...that's more honorable
Not the Gulf wars spent most of their time on their backs... they had typical Western mothers.
@@robertwarner1160Maybe the women you knew, but the military wives of my acquaintance were chaste, supportive, and raised their families well under very difficult circumstances.
@sitresjolie2343 yeah in ww1 and ww2 how old are you?
I'm very disappointed in the Blaze👎🏻. Both my husband and I are lifelong Conservatives with strong family values. We are disgusted at the left's agenda, especially, against children. To say a woman or single people should not vote is ignorant and screams "controlling and insecure masculinity". This mindset only makes the left push their agenda harder. While women should be responsible to not end up being a "baby mama", men are equally contributing to the destruction of the traditional family unit. Men need to lead by example. No respectful woman will allow any man to lead her if he's not honoring himself first, which includes, not being promiscuous when he's single or married. There are many reasons and influences as to why or society has fatherless children, it is not just the woman's fault. There are also just as many men as there are women who vote irresponsibly and uneducated. I do agree that only citizens should be allowed to vote. I hope the Blaze reconsiders this podcast because it's only fueling the left's agenda to pander to women to go against Conservative values by making women a "mute" participant in voting 🗳. Not very smart. If my husband were to pass away, I am grateful to be able to vote as a Conservative woman and not have my vote be taken away because he is no longer here. Again, there are many reasons and influences as to why our society has strayed from God and demoralized itself. Putting the blame squarely on women is reductive, short-sighted and will only solidify the left's agenda.
90 percent voted for joe are you sure females should vote still
Exactly. The idea expressed here and by many in the comments section is definitely not helping the conservative cause. I’ve seen similar discussions on other conservative leaning shows as well.
You cannot enforce your own rights. You have to rely on men to do this for you. All the freedoms you have in this world, exist solely through the benevolence of men. As a result of this reality, females are inherently unequal to men, and therefore your vote should not count as much. It probably shouldn't count at all. Not to mention that none of you were forced to sign up for selective service in order to vote. That fact alone invalidates all of your arguments. Well over 60% of you women are voting Democrat. If you were stricken from voting, the Democrats would quite possibly never take power again. Whether you want to believe it or not, you females and your imaginary rights are absolutely creating more problems than you're solving.
I'm glad that you acknowledge we're in a big mess, and I agree with some of what you are saying. In a case where families voted, if your husband died it would be absurd to take your household's vote away, especially if you have been involved with or a main driver of the vote in your household.
But other parts of what you say actually speak directly to the issue. For example, saying that bringing up the possibility that women's suffrage may have been a mistake is "masculine insecurity" is a point one would expect to hear on the View. The psychological associations or smears you claim about any viewpoint are by definition fallacious. They aren't material to the issue. In political theorizing, one doesn't think if a viewpoint is masculine or feminine to determine if it is correct because those aren't indicative of correctness. Instead, you should be asking how the nature of politics, politicking and campaigning, has changed since women's suffrage. How has it changed and has it changed for the better? On the whole, are men and women persuaded by the same messaging? On the whole do they agree on what the main tasks and limitations are of government? Have politicians changed their approach to governing when they have to appeal to women?
Then we might ask about our current situation again. Are we as a country better off since women's suffrage and all these other progressive measures that have now had their effect? I won't answer, but I will say that this is a better way to frame the issue. It sounds to me like you would say that the answer is mixed. Some of what came out of this era was good and some was bad.
Lastly, women have always been and will always be involved in politics. Aristotle basically says it doesn't matter who the king is when he is married to a strong woman.
I wish you a happy Memorial Day.
no, they shouldn't, amongst other things. we've witnessed what they've done with that right for over 100 years now. end of story.
And we've watched men screw up just as badly. We have kept this country together since its founding.
@@Ash-hi5hy Almost everything you see around you was created by and is currently being maintained by men. Everything you have in this world is the result of benevolent men. You modern women have done absolutely nothing but tear down a miraculous society that was created by men. Not only have you become useless, but you've actually become toxic. You are the problem.
@@Ash-hi5hy cope more.
What are we doing?
No.
Harrison Butker identified HIS greatest role in life as husband/father/provider/protector and credited his WIFE for his success in & outside of their family.
This is still very true for most of humanity.
Who cares. He kicks a ball for a living. And this is absolutely not true for the majority of men in this country. You modern women are becoming more trouble than you're worth. That's why discussions like this are starting to happen with more regularity.
So a 73 year old divorced female senior shouldn’t vote?
Nope.
Absolutely not. None of you are able to separate your emotions from decision-making. You're all the same.
I'm not willing to give up my right to vote.
Until women are required to register for the draft, then they should not be able to vote. A man who fails to register between the ages of 18 and 26...
1. Can be charged with "knowingly fail or neglect or refuse to register" for the draft. The penalty is up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
2. Are ineligible to work for, or do business with, the Federal Government. That includes working for the multitude of federal contractors. Right now women comprise 43.3 percent of the Federal workforce. None of them had to register with selective service to get their job. 100% of their male counterparts did. This applies to holding public office, either elected or assigned. That includes POTUS.
3. Are ineligible for employment with most State and Local governments.
4. Are ineligible for drivers licenses in Forty states and the District of Columbia.
5. Are ineligible for student aid programs such as guaranteed student loans, Pell grants and federal scholarship programs. 31 states mirror this requirement for State programs. Eight states will not allow a man who did not register to attend classes at a State University, regardless of ability to pay tuition.
6. Are ineligible for Federal job training under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (formerly Workforce Investment Act).
7. Immigrant men who lived in the U.S. or got their green card at any time between the ages of 18 and 26 but did not register with selective must demonstrate an additional five years of "good moral character" to apply for Naturalization. Their female counterparts do not have this requirement.
Personally I do not want to see women be sent to war, but if women can vote for a politician who has the power to start a war, or can serve in a political or appointed position like Secretary of State (looking at you Killary), then I feel very strongly that they should have to personally experience the consequences of that decision... just like men. Until that happens, I will never see women as equal to men under the law.
No, they shouldn't! Nor drive for that matter.
Who would drive my legally blind son? My husband is deceased. Would you like to transport him to work? Bring me my groceries? Uber, etc., is too expensive.
Poor interview
Time to rethink JP
We also need to eliminate the 16th and 17th Amendments.
I always voted for who my father said to vote for and then who my husband said to vote for.
Your point?
@@jenniferli185 - I was living at home when I was 18 and first eligible to vote so I voted for who was best for my father since he was the financial provider then I voted for who was best for my husband as he was the main financial provider.
yes they should be allowed to vote. but they shouldnt actually vote
We love you blaze tv we the people,we love trump,trump2024WH ❤❤❤❤❤
Imo no. We're way too emotional, and we consider looks over policy.I've never voted. I let my husband handle that. 😅
Then you Admit your NOT A SMART WOMAN! your not funny! Shame on You!
Please ask your husband what polices he supports.
@@bl4ckkn1g8t5 We're Roman Catholic and conservative. Peace be with you. 😇
@@rachelhelen898
So is Joe Biden.
Glad you support Peace though
@@bl4ckkn1g8t5 Beware of false prophets and wolves in sheep's clothing. Don't you see that?! Even the pope is wack. I can see it. God bless you.
This topic is sensitive, but our familial woes in the US began when we opened *_Pandora's "closet"_* in the 60's also associated with _"women's rights"_ provoking women to *_work_* (knowing all fiat _"currency"_ fails eventually) to prolong the monetary swindle known as _"creating debt and money out of thin air,"_ creating higher prices and breaking down the family while importing drugs (CIA) and/or anything to destabilize the last vestige of semi/pseudo freedom on the planet, the West (also, the biblical, two-horned _"beast"_ - dollar is _"the mark of the beast"_ - _"...in hand or forehead:"_ *_thoughts and deeds_* ). Anyway, all the best to you (also available for parties and bar mitzvahs :-)
NO!!!
This might be a new low for the blaze if we're asking questions like this
shut up
Actually I think it's a new high...a liberal professor recently said "We got everything we want...why are are lives getting worse, not better?". Licentious Liberty doesn't work...Traditionalism does
People are asking questions like this because there are disturbingly obvious problems coming to light as a direct result of allowing females to vote.
I agree, especially given that Beck is LDS and the LDS Church was an early proponent of female suffrage and allows female members to vote on church callings.
@dumon4264 Your comment should be pinned at the top ⬆️. I'm very disappointed in the Blaze👎🏻. Both my husband and I are lifelong Conservatives with strong family values. We are disgusted at the left's agenda, especially, against children. To say a woman or single people should not vote is ignorant and screams "controlling and insecure masculinity". This mindset only makes the left push their agenda harder. While women should be responsible to not end up being a "baby mama", men are equally contributing to the destruction of the traditional family unit. Men need to lead by example. No respectful woman will allow any man to lead her if he's not honoring himself first, which includes, not being promiscuous when he's single or married. There are many reasons and influences as to why or society has fatherless children, it is not just the woman's fault. There are also just as many men as there are women who vote irresponsibly and uneducated. I do agree that only citizens should be allowed to vote. I hope the Blaze reconsiders this podcast because it's only fueling the left's agenda to pander to women to go against Conservative values by making women a "mute" participant in voting 🗳. Not very smart. If my husband were to pass away, I am grateful to be able to vote as a Conservative woman and not have my vote be taken away because he is no longer here. Again, there are many reasons and influences as to why our society has strayed from God and demoralized itself. Putting the blame squarely on women is reductive, short-sighted and will only solidify the left's agenda.
Do not walk the fence. You will fall off and may not fall where you want to lamd. You have brought attention to yourself
Jesus Christ died for our Sins according to the scriptures and that he was buried and that he rose Again the third day praise God praying for everyone everyday God bless you all...
The answer is YES. I don't need to watch or hear any of this video. The answer to the question is YES.
Make a valid argument as to why they should, or shut up.
Real queue . Shld men be allowed to vote !
Some men probably shouldn't, but ALL men have more of a right to vote than you do, if for no other reason than we are forced to sign up for the selective services.
Is there practices to get closer been trying I want to
Its known that woman tend to vote popularity rather than policy.
some vote just based of how someone looks
Look up Operation Paperclip.
I wonder if this conversation is useful.
Not only is it useful, it's necessary. You women are now creating more problems than you're worth.
5:15
No
Abdikadir mahamed farah qayloos iwas devorced exwife 2014 ten years ago,now iam not couple'iam single father &never married somali womens again no noway,so we love trump,trump2024WH ❤❤❤❤❤
Shouldn't be allowed to vote, drive, join the military, politician and a cop.
Or operate within the Judicial system.
Hey blaze tv my sports is not premier league,laliga,italian, sport,bundsliga,my sports is american football,so catchup all idiots,we the people,we love trump,trump2024WH ❤❤❤❤❤
I do not need to watch this video to say with 10000000000% certainty that no women should be allowed to vote or drive ever, also should not be allowed to be politicians, or managers.
Honestly, women are not the problem per se.. My wife said no and I say only the land owners. But nothing changing is probably the least damaging thing to do.
Unless you have paid off your loan, and are never expected to pay taxes on your land, you are not a land owner. The banks and the government own your land.
You are so wrong. You need to vote. You vote could help family
That's a ridiculous argument. Around 90% of women who are having abortions are doing so purely out of convenience. Does that help families?
WTF?? Unsubed
You had to edit that comment?!. Maybe it’s for the best then.😂
😂😂😂 it's a debate, yet you unsubed over the question of should women have the right to vote? I'll say that I fully support repealing the right for women to vote. Women are far too emotional to make sound decisions that effect millions. If it wasn't for women, Joe wouldn't have been elected. So yes, the question should be asked and based on your irrational response, you have proven why women should not have the right to vote
@@jinxxrabbit4833 Maybe braying like a jackass is better?
Bye
Adios!!!!!
No
No.