*Upon* *Him* *Be* *Peace* *Moses, was "also raised"* *I n* *T h e* ' *H o u s e* ' ' ' Of The T y r a n t ' R u l e r P h a r a o h *By the Will of Allah Most High* *He did not remain therein*
The Dead Sea scrolls confirm the info in surah Al kahf. According to historians the Essenes lived in caves for 300 years and they used a solar calendar unlike other Israelites who used a lunar calendar. This is confirmed in surah Al kahf where Allah almighty is pulling our attention to the mathematical conversion (300 years and 309 years) one is solar calendar years and the other is Lunar calendar years. Allah would not have made the conversion if the essenes used a lunar calendar. This info was only discovered in the Dead Sea scrolls and not known before that.
Assalamwalaikum Mr. Williams, I am an undergraduate student and I am a student of knowledge of your insight and videos, All praises do to Allah SWT, you have made me a much more knowledgeable student when it comes to defending Islam.
You should read the books yourself. Paul has a tendency not to be very accurate in what he reports what others say. He refers to the Birmingham folies as if they are a complete quran, they are not. And more than 75% of surah 33 are missing, so why would he worry about 15% of one book of the Hebrew Bible not being used today. That alone makes Paul a hypocrite and what he says must be taken with a pinch of salt.
@@hassanmirza2392 I agree, Paul did not say that the Birmingham folios where not a full quran and he did not say that some 75% of surah 33 are missing. Wonder why he did not mention this. You think he is ignorant of this fact or that he is just dishonst?
AsSalaamu Aleykum mr Paul, very interesting again! I converted to Islam a few months ago and the amount of information I received from your podcast/channel is tremendous alhamdulillah. My family is Christian, Protestants. I’m hoping one day they will accept me sharing some of your videos like these with them, because it’s just very interesting and informative and it’s never a bad idea to learn something, Goodday, Kim
WA Alaikum Salaam, May Allah cause each and every member of your Family and Friends to Accept Islam at your Hands! May we all meet in Jannat Al Firdaus Aameen Ya Rabbul Aameen!
Salaams Mr Williams. I find your content to be well researched and every informative. As a person who was born Muslim I am embarrassed to say my knowledge is wholly inadequate. Shukar Alhamdullilah for all the resources available online. Jazakallah khair for your excellent content.
As Salamu Alaikum Brother William I have been listening to your talks, Alhamdulillah Allah has given you such ilm (knowledge) which he gives to very few people may Allah bless, you and save you.
Sa’d ibn Abi Waqqas (ra) reported: We were sitting with the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and he said, *“Shall I not tell you of something by which a man among you can supplicate to relieve the hardships or trials of the world when they descend?”* They said, “Of course!” The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “It is the prayer of Jonah, Dhul Nun: لَّآ إِلَٰهَ إِلَّآ أَنتَ سُبۡحَٰنَكَ إِنِّي كُنتُ مِنَ ٱلظَّٰلِمِينَ There is no God but You, glory be to You for I have certainly been among the wrongdoers.” (21:87) Source: al-Sunan al-Kubrá lil-Nasā’ī 10416 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
@@sabrunjamyylun2573 NOTHING! BUT! *THE MESSENGER OF ALLAH (ﷺ) SAID:* May Allah brighten the face of a person who hears a tradition from us and he memorizes it until he can convey it to others. Perhaps he will convey it to one who understands better than him, and perhaps one who conveys knowledge does not understand it himself. Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 3660 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani *AND HE ALSO SAID* The Prophet (ﷺ) said: Convey (my teachings) to the people even if it were a single sentence. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 3461 *AND ALLAH ﷻ SAYS IN THE QURAN* [Surah Adh-Dhāriyāt: 55] But ˹continue to˺ remind. For certainly reminders benefit the believers.
This video made me think about this vers فَوَيْلٌۭ لِّلَّذِينَ يَكْتُبُونَ ٱلْكِتَـٰبَ بِأَيْدِيهِمْ ثُمَّ يَقُولُونَ هَـٰذَا مِنْ عِندِ ٱللَّهِ لِيَشْتَرُوا۟ بِهِۦ ثَمَنًۭا قَلِيلًۭا ۖ فَوَيْلٌۭ لَّهُم مِّمَّا كَتَبَتْ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَوَيْلٌۭ لَّهُم مِّمَّا يَكْسِبُونَ ٧٩ So woe to those who distort the Scripture with their own hands then say, “This is from Allah”-seeking a fleeting gain! So woe to them for what their hands have written, and woe to them for what they have earned.
8 How can you say, "We are wise, for we have the law of the Lord," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely? 9 The wise will be put to shame; they will be dismayed and trapped. Since they have rejected the word of the Lord, what kind of wisdom do they have? [NIV Jeremiah 8:8-9]
@badroboudjerda4394 Yes, that's the point. Jeremiah is from the Bible itself and identified the issue for them. So God continued to send them Prophets to correct what was falsified until we got the final revelation, the Qur'an.
@jannievorster3371 Did the serpent present evidences to his claims, facts that could be fact checked, sources that could be analysed. Or did the serpent play on the emotions and urged pure blind faith? Think about that
جزاكم الله خيرا أستاذنا الفاضل بول وليامز على كل ماتقدمه في هذه القناة وأشكرك جزيل الشكر ل تعريفنا ب الدكتور علي عطائي نفعنا الله تعالى بك و بالدكتور علي ❤
So Hebrew scriptures from the Tanakh in the Dead Sea Scrolls would lack the type of phonetic vowel markings that were standardized much later in time; is that right? Songs of Solomon 5:11 His head is as the finest gold; his locks are curled, [they are as] black as a raven. Rashi comments on the meaning of "his head is as gold", saying: "[it] glistens like the finest gold. כֶּתֶם is a term referring to the treasures of kings which they store in their treasure houses, and similarly, (Lam. 4:1): “[How] changed is the fine gold jewelry (הַכֶּתֶם) ,” and similarly, (Job 31:24): “and to jewelry (לַכֶּתֶם) I said, ‘My confidence,’” and similarly, (Prov. 25:12): “and jewelry of finest gold (כָתֶם).” So this man is being described as a King. He isn't literally wearing a physical crown, but his head is still like the purest gold. This indicates spiritual and social status. Rashi then mentions that "hair as black as a raven" is a quality of beauty. This is what verse 11 literally says in Hebrew: rō-šōw ke-ṯem pāz his head [is] like gold; (the) finest qəw-wṣ-ṣō-w-ṯāw tal-tal-lîm his locks; wavy (like palm-branches) This is quite a strange literary device. This particular form only occurs in this verse. The Brown-Driver-Briggs dictionary says: "envelope or sheath of spadix of date-palm, with which hair is often compared in Arabic poetry", and that's why it's usually translated as "locks of wavy hair", but they aren't exactly sure what it means. They take that meaning from Arabic poetry, as there's no Biblical passage that uses this word, and nowhere else are any similar forms ever translated to mean "bushy locks". These are two nouns, by the way. So it's actually quite a difficult expression to translate. šə-ḥō-rō-wṯ kā-‘ō-w-rêḇ (and) [they are] black like a raven Note that the word for "(like a) raven" there is very similar to "(like an) Arab", if you'd subtly change it. In Ezekiel 27:21, it says עֲרַב֙ In Genesis 8:7, it says עֹרֵ֑ב The first ‘ă·raḇ means Arabia, whereas ‘ō-rêḇ in Genesis is a crow. Job 38:41 עֹרֵ֗ב Psalm 83:11 עֹרֵ֣ב The first ‘ō-rêḇ is a crow, while ‘ō·rêḇ in the Psalm is a proper noun and name: Oreb (a name of a Midianite, and of a cliff near the Jordan river). Job 24:5 עֲרָבָ֥ה That's ‘ă-rā-ḇāh, which now means desert or wilderness. Isaiah 13:20 עֲרָבִ֔י Nehemiah 2:19 הָֽעַרְבִ֔י This says ‘ă·rā·ḇî, which means an Arab, or an Arabian. Nehemiah reads hā-‘ar-ḇî, meaning "the Arab". The point being that "crow" and "Arab" are extremely similar in writing, and pronunciations differ only because of small diacritics. If the text hasn't been properly preserved, and isn't 100% intact, then another reading of šə-ḥō-rō-wṯ kā-‘ō-w-rêḇ might have said: "(and) [his hairs are] black like an Arab" The preposition kā here doesn't necessarily literally mean 'a resemblance', as kāna in Arabic can mean "to be", because ka- can mark the present tense. Kayqūl ma bḡa means "he says (presently) what he wants" and it wouldn't mean that 'it's similar to' "saying what he wants". Consider: "His head (is) as the finest gold, (and) his locks (are) black as an Arab('s typically are)". I've often wondered if my inquiry (and pseudo analysis) here could be valid, and if the scribes could've 'tweaked' the word, in order to change the meaning. After all, why would this text be describing an Arab? To them, that must've sounded strange. Maybe some ancient scribe thought that he was about to copy a previously made error, and that he needed to correct it. Other geographic designations, however, are used in Songs 5 to describe aspects of this individual and/or others (e.g. Lebanon and Jerusalem). Jeremiah 3:2 כַּעֲרָבִ֖י Songs 5:11 כָּעוֹרֵֽב Ka·‘ă·rā·ḇî from Jeremiah literally means "like an Arab", while kā·‘ō·w·rêḇ in Songs 5:11 means "like a raven". עֲרָבִי עֹרֵב Arabian: Ayin, Resh, Bet Raven: Ayin, Resh, Bet If we omit the Kaf in Jeremiah 3:2, it leaves us with the letters Ayin, Resh, Bet, but when we omit the Kaf in Songs, we have Ayin, Waw, Resh, Bet. Why is that? Why does it include the Waw here? Can anyone comment on that? "Raven" in Job 38:41, Genesis 8:7 and "Oreb" in Psalm 83:11 all lack a Waw. I don't understand why Songs' "raven" is spelled as A-W-R-B. It seems to be the only instance "raven" is written like that. Isaiah 34:11 wə-yan-šō-wp̄ wə-‘ō-rêḇ and the owl and the raven Here, וְעֹרֵ֖ב is spelled as A-R-B, as seems to be typical. Also, I can't really detect a rhyme scheme in the text, but I don't know Hebrew, so I'm not entirely sure there is none, and if there is; how it's structured. The previous verse ends with mê-rə-ḇā-ḇāh, and then verse 10 ends with šə-ḥō-rō-wṯ kā-‘ō-w-rêḇ, and in the middle of 12 it says rō-ḥă-ṣō-wṯ be-ḥā-lāḇ. Again, this is highly speculative on my part, and rooted in ignorance, but mê-rə-ḇā-ḇāh - šə-ḥō-rō-wṯ kā-‘ă·rāḇ - rō-ḥă-ṣō-wṯ be-ḥā-lāḇ kinda sounds more like a pattern to me. I looked up this chapter in the Dead Sea Scrolls, but it appears they haven't translated this part yet, or it doesn't exist in the scrolls. I could only find a translation of the first verse: Lover 1 I have come into my garden, my sister, my bride. I have gathered my myrrh with my spice; I have eaten my honeycomb with my honey; I have drunk my wine with my milk. I have eaten my honeycomb with my honey; Friends! Eat, friends! Drink, yes, drink abundantly, beloved. And this is filled with sidenotes. Different words, words with different spellings, English words supplied to make it readable wherever words are missing, etc. I think only six words of the above translation are identical to the traditional text. The rest all seem to be problematic in one way or another. At the top it says about this chapter: "Translation process is ongoing." This translation is from the 4Q107 Canticles (manuscript), labled 6Q6? I assume this describes the cave it's been found in, at Qumran. It's dated to 30 B.C - 68 A.D. The site says there are 4 scrolls containing (parts or fragments of) Songs of Solomon. Yet, verse 1 is all they got for chapter 5? Kinda meager, no? I don't know how up-to-date this particular website is. And I'm curious if 5:11 is included, and (if so), how it 'could' be read.
No printing press , they relied on hand writing of people who could make one mistake and pass it on to everyone. While Muslims relied on memorization of the Quran and were always corrected by each other especially when they lead prayers
@@Sosarchives thats just your assumption. The fact it’s been preserved for 1450 years, Allah himself said He would preserve it in the Quran, says something. Allah also says he made it easy to remember, and we have 6-7 year olds who memorized the entire Quran , that also says something
in the book of Isiah (from dead sea scroll) chapter 42 verse 11 it is written... "Let the desert cry out, its cities and the villages that Kedar inhabits, and let the inhabitants of Sela sing for joy. Let them shout aloud from the tops of the mountains." Kedar was the son of Ismail As and also sela is the mountain in medinah just 500 metres away from masjid nabwi. So the prophecy of Hazrat Muhammad SA is there in the dead sea scrolls
@@hahaloser3914you may be referring to other scroll because there were many pages found but The only scroll which was found from start to end was book of isiah and in that chapter 42 verse 11 Muhammad SAW sign is there Thanks
two silver scroll amulets from the Ketef Hinnom archaeological site are the oldest pieces of the Torah ever found in the world. The scrolls were discovered in 1979 and were estimated to be from around the late seventh or early sixth century BCE. The two small strips of silver contain what is known as the Priestly Benediction, from the Book of Numbers (the fourth book of the Torah), making it the oldest biblical passage ever found on an ancient artifact. The curse tablet of Mount Ebal about 1000 BCE
I’m glad you did search on that, because Christian will say the Dead Sea scrolls confirmed bible preservation, thanks for these enlightenment and Alhamdullilahi for Islam and peace and blessings of be unto the last prophet Muhammad sallahu alaihi wasallam , his family and the sahaba for the Quran compilation and preservation Amin
👋👍Excellent presentation! It's well known that the Hebrew Bible was 'corrected' by Jewish scribes around 800 BCE (after the end of the Bronze Age). Seems like Mr B. Ehrman's book confirms that. Definitely worth reading it!
@@georgiacap9294 Yes, but Esther is later and Brat needs to reform his late Daniel hypothesis based on the DSS fragments. The video totally omits many facts on a complex subject, probably because he's pushing a fake interpretation on The Passion.
Also in the scroll is a group who followed someone they called the righteous teacher 150-100 years before Jesus and many things in gospels were clearly taken from this group, for all we know the gospel writers were probably part of this group
Subhanallah. The Book of Isaiah is said to contain the prophecy of our beloved Muhammad SAW. Recalling Dr Ali Ataie earlier talk w brother Paul. Lovely piece sir. Salam from KL
Paul, the scriptures of Ethiopia are at the root of all Semitic languages, sad that the English universities doesn't have any research of the ancient languages of that area. I wish there were.
Salaam brother Paul. Moses AS could not have lived 2-2,5000 BCE as Ramesis the second (pharaoh of exodus) lived about 1200 BCE. Furthermore, Yusuf AS was most likely in Egypt during the Hyksos era which was only about 1500BCE
Great informative video. Really appreciate your time and dedication on researching and most of all sharing what you've learnt in a short summary which would otherwise be unavailable to many.
Thank you so much. For long, I'd been looking for something reliable about this subject. I'm there now. If I may ask, can we accept that the Palestinians are true ancient Judeans?. Please advise.❤
بارك الله فيكم... اللهم اغفر لوالدينا و ارحمهما و اجمعنا معهما في الفردوس الأعلى مع الأنبياء و الشهداء و الصالحين و جميع موتى المسلمين.. اللهم احقن دماء المسلمين و انصرهم على من عاداهم.. رب إني مسني الضر و أنت أرحم الراحمين... لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين..... .''''''' .............. . ................................
Thanks Paul sharing for this, quite an interesting one. I’d suggest you to search Dr. Zafer Duygu and his works on this subject, he’s one of the most knowledgeable and highly respected researchers in Turkey on this matter, his main studies are about the evidences of the historical transformation of Christianity and Judaism and the Scriptures. Maybe you can invite him one day to your platform.
Tbh, the terms "Complete Bible" is kinda missleading at this point. what I mean is that we dont have the "Complete Bible" today, as we all know some individuals make their own version of "Complete Bible". and on top of that, the exegeses from the church and the layman are kinda full of missguidance and all over the place as well from the "Complete Bible" itself. 15:40 About the "Book of Isaiah" I wonder why it preserve like that. hmm
Christians would reply to this argument by saying ' I saw jesus in my dream and my life changed after that, Hallelujah, hence christianity must be true'
Nope, the implications for the “late” composition for the Pentateuch is that Abrahamic religion in general isn’t true. You guys can quote all the scholars but they all agree that moses, abraham and adam didn’t even exist. and it’s precisely due to the documentary hypothesis 😊
3:20 Paul, Moses didn't live 2000 or 2500BCE, not by any historical account. Definitely within 1450-1250BCE, this being the 18th or 19th dynasty of Egypt.
اللهُمَّ حَاسِبْنِي حِسَابًا يَسِيرًا *O Allah, grant me an easy reckoning* [Allāhumma ḥāsibnī ḥisāba-y-yasīrā.] [Musnad Aḥmad 24215] • Aisha (رضي الله عنها) reported: The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: Whoever is fully taken to account on the Day of Resurrection will be punished.” I said, “Has not Allah Almighty said: He will soon have an easy reckoning?” (84:8) The Prophet said, “That is not the reckoning, for it is only the presentation of deeds. Whoever is interrogated for his account will be punished.” •Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2876
It is indeed a fact that the Hebrew script had adopted the Arabic system of ‘inflections.’ Wrt to the Dead Sea Scrolls, I urge people to read the book ‘The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception’ by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh.
Very informative video. A question, some muslims claim that within the book of Isaiah, there is a prophesy of Muhammed. Is there credibility to this claim?
@@jennifersilves4195 Thank you dear person. So I researched the Shem To's Hebrew Matthew. And I do not believe what this video kind Sir is right. So I will comment above. Thanks again Brethren.
Dr Kipp Davis is an expert in the DSS, he's also active on YT. Would be an epic crossover if you feature him, he has many insights I find very helpful!
Very interesting paul. I wonder could you recommend your top 10 books for those who want to do a more scholarly study of christianity than what the main line churches offer. Perhaps a video
"Woe, then, to those who write the book with their hands and then say: This is from Allah, so that they may take for it a small price; therefore woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they earn." Qur'an 2:79
nah brother, don't follow any video u see. it's a forgery. & stop using this symbol it has nothing to do with Islam nor the prophet told us to use a symbol. It's a late innovation by Otthomans. @@mohammedzulk8485
Alhamdulillah. I learned more about Dead sea scrolls. My Allah rewards you abundantly, brother Paul. Have you make a video of discussion with dead sea scrolls expert, Dr Eisenman?
@@harharharharharharharharha240 If you don't understand what I mean please excuse me , English is not my mother tongue , although I was really touched by the late Queen
thank you for this video, but one thing that bothered me is that in the early parts of your video you mention dates an centuries allot, but in the later parts of the video you talk about books and new and old testament and the canon, but you don't talk about when those are? could you add a pinned comment or description with timestamps when you talk about books from which century or time it was from.
I suggest discussing the book Dialogue of Civilizations (A Doctrinal Study in Light of the Qur’an and Sunnah) Author: Fahd bin Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah Al-Sunaidi Supervision: Dr. Mazen bin Salah Mutabaqani. It is written in Arabic.
Ehrman is a New Testament scholar, not a Hebrew Bible-Dead Sea Scrolls scholar. Here's what some scholars of the Hebrew Bible and DSS say about the matter, including one of your favourites, Geza Vermes: "We have seen that the consonantal text of the Tiberian Masoretic tradition [i.e., the text of the Leningrad Codex] can be traced back into the earliest attested manuscripts from the Second Temple period (third century B.C.E.) and, on the basis of orthography, [spelling] can be carried back further, possibly to the time of Ezra." -- Khan, Geoffrey, A Short Introduction to the Tiberian Masoretic Bible and its Reading Tradition, Georgias Press, 2013, p. 63 "The Dead Sea Scrolls partly confirm and partly question the reliability of the wording of the Bible handed down by Jewish tradition. On the one hand, as was shown in chapter VI, ****the Qumran Scripture is substantially identical with that passed on by the Synagogue from the time of Jesus to the present age.**** On the other hand, the Dead Sea Scrolls furnish documentary proof of what has been surmised before, namely that, prior to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE, unity was not yet achieved and different forms of the Hebrew text coexisted, showing verbal and stylistic variations, additions, omissions and changes in the order of textual arrangement. Before the Qumran discoveries, we presumed that the Samaritan Bible (restricted to the five books of the Law of Moses), the form of the Hebrew Bible from which the ancient Greek version, known as the Septuagint, was translated, and the type of the text that was to evolve into the traditional (Masoretic) Hebrew Old Testament, existed side by side in different social groups. Qumran has corroborated this theory and has ****demonstrated that diversity could obtain in one and the same group. This phenomenon implies that the variant readings in the biblical text do not represent corruptions or deliberate alterations, but can just as well, if not better, echo earlier discrete written traditions.****" -- Vermes, Geza, The Story of the Scrolls, Penguin Books, 2010, pp. 213-214
@@ConsideringPhlebas Good work pointing out the obvious in your initial comments but the Greek, Samaritan, DSS are all more closely related to each other in terms of Moses than the Leningrad and Allepo traditions, see Tsedaka. Another comment here has pointed out that Ge'ez manuscripts are under-researched, something most people are unaware of. Rabbi Singer seems to say that the Jewish literature also fully contains the Masoretic tradition. Nehemia Gordon points out that no two ancient Torah scrolls are the same.
The Dead Sea scrolls confirm the info in surah Al kahf. According to historians the Essenes lived in caves for 300 years and they used a solar calendar unlike other Israelites who used a lunar calendar. This is confirmed in surah Al kahf where Allah almighty is pulling our attention to / with the mathematical conversion (300 years and 309 years) one is solar calendar years and the other is Lunar calendar years. This info was only discovered after the Dead Sea scrolls were discovered
Notice the slight of hand (deception). Williams says (3:44) the oldest "complete manuscript", which he means a complete copy of the old testament, that we have is the Leningrad codex which dates from the year "1000 CE". Then (6:43) williams gives muslims "a footnote" by comparing the Leningrad codex with the koran. The example he gives is the Birmingham manuscript. But, this is his deception trick, because he is comparing the COMPLETE Leningrad bible with three suras in Birmingham. So he is not comparing a complete bible with a complete koran. He is comparing a complete bible with SCRAPS of the/A koran in Birmingham, whose scraps text are not completely identical to the same suras you have today.. If paul used equal scales, there are old testament manuscript scraps too, that are older than the Leningrad codex. Much older. The ketef Hinnom scrolls which has material from leviticus and deuteronomy is dated at the "late 7th century or early 6th century BCE. 1000 years older than islam! So instead on comparing fragment for fragment, like the ketef hinnom scroll with the three suras in Birmingham, williams deliberately deceives his audience into thinking that he is comparing a complete koran with the complete Leningrad codex, when he is not doing so at all. Even right before he tries to make a comparison with the Birmingham manuscript three suras, he says "but not even among the Dead Sea scrolls did we find complete manuscripts OF THE ENTIRE HEBREW BIBLE". But the Birmingham manuscripts are NOT "the entire" koran. It is just three suras. Williams even calls the three suras of the Birmingham manuscript (6:49) "copies of the koran". It is not a copy of the koran. Birmingham manuscripts are only three suras. So is williams just stupid or is he corrupt? You decide. There can be no other possible explanations for why williams did what he did. I don't know why muslims accept such charlatans tricking muslims into believing false information. What it does show though is that Williams is very corrupt. If you are going to teach something, teach it. Don't corrupt and distort the facts in hope that no one would notice. I have placed the time stamps in this post so you can go and see for yourselves the trick williams tries to pull off. And then ask yourselves, is this what you want, someone to deceive you and lead you into believing a lie? And then ask yourselves, what time of person does that? Someone who actually believes in God, or an atheist who is free to lie and distort without fear of divine judgement? Or is, that Williams thinks his god allah approves of the deception if it makes islam look better than it really is?
Both , the Torah and the Quran were orally revealed. The Muslims memorized the Quran from beginning and passed it down to the next generations we still can trace back to Muhammad (saw) , the Torah we have today cannot be traced back to Moses (as) as it was written today. The Quran also has these complete manuscripts like the Samarkand codex , only removed by 150 years from Muhammad (saw) , meanwhile the oldest full manuscript of the Old Testament is removed 1300 years from Moses (as) and the oldest complete bible is removed 350 years from Jesus (as) in a foreign language. So to sum up , the oral memorization is better perfectly preserved in Islam and the oldest manuscript of the Quran is more near to Muhammad (saw) than the other scriptures that are removed by 350 to 1300 years to their prophets lifetime
@@faiqdzihnan That is exactly being questioned: is it truly from God of the Bible? Now if the Quran is not referring to the God of Jesus Christ then it would seem Allah has no history before the 7th century as if someone made him up. You can't have it both ways, you can't claim you worship the God of Abraham then have the Quran contradict all scriptures written before the 7th century.
@@smidlee7747 do you know why there are so many prophets in the first place?. Because human always changed/corrupted the teaching of the prophet. Every prophet taught monotheism, not trinity. Why is there no prophet after Muhammad pbuh?, because quran is preserved.
@@faiqdzihnan No because the law demands there is at least two witnesses for something to be established and so someone doesn't become proud and think he is God's special pet... like Muhammad. Jesus came to fulfill the law and prophets so John the Baptist was the last prophet. Of course Muhammad is not the last one claiming to be a prophet , Joseph Smith , Warren Jeffs who is now in prison claimed to be a prophet. Like Muhammad they were solo prophets.
Didn't the Hebrew language change over 1000 years until the Leningrad version? I am sure some words creep into it, some words acquire new meaning or additional meanings?
Error: I said Moses lived about 2000 BC. In fact he probably lived in 13th century BC.
*Upon*
*Him*
*Be*
*Peace*
*Moses, was "also raised"*
*I n*
*T h e* '
*H o u s e* ' ' '
Of The T y r a n t '
R u l e r P h a r a o h
*By the Will of Allah Most High*
*He did not remain therein*
The Dead Sea scrolls confirm the info in surah Al kahf. According to historians the Essenes lived in caves for 300 years and they used a solar calendar unlike other Israelites who used a lunar calendar. This is confirmed in surah Al kahf where Allah almighty is pulling our attention to the mathematical conversion (300 years and 309 years) one is solar calendar years and the other is Lunar calendar years. Allah would not have made the conversion if the essenes used a lunar calendar. This info was only discovered in the Dead Sea scrolls and not known before that.
Another Dead Sea scrolls expert is Dr Robert Eisenman who in one of his videos said the message of Jesus was VERY ISLAMIC.
Forgive me.. Correct me if I am wrong.. Moses bin Imran bin Kehat bin Levy bin Jacob PBUH lived about 1.800 BC
Based on the data I have, the time between Moses death and the coming of Jesus was about 1741 years.
Assalamwalaikum Mr. Williams, I am an undergraduate student and I am a student of knowledge of your insight and videos, All praises do to Allah SWT, you have made me a much more knowledgeable student when it comes to defending Islam.
Paul has made everyone of us knowledgeable about Abrahmic theology. Thanks Paul!
You should read the books yourself. Paul has a tendency not to be very accurate in what he reports what others say. He refers to the Birmingham folies as if they are a complete quran, they are not. And more than 75% of surah 33 are missing, so why would he worry about 15% of one book of the Hebrew Bible not being used today. That alone makes Paul a hypocrite and what he says must be taken with a pinch of salt.
@@johnzuma4688
he never said this.
@@hassanmirza2392 I agree, Paul did not say that the Birmingham folios where not a full quran and he did not say that some 75% of surah 33 are missing. Wonder why he did not mention this. You think he is ignorant of this fact or that he is just dishonst?
@@johnzuma4688
I think you are dishonest. All the oldest Qur'an manuscripts go back to the 1st Islamic century. Uthmanic codex is well preserved.
AsSalaamu Aleykum mr Paul, very interesting again!
I converted to Islam a few months ago and the amount of information I received from your podcast/channel is tremendous alhamdulillah.
My family is Christian, Protestants. I’m hoping one day they will accept me sharing some of your videos like these with them, because it’s just very interesting and informative and it’s never a bad idea to learn something,
Goodday, Kim
wa alaikum assalam and congratulations Kim!
WA Alaikum Salaam, May Allah cause each and every member of your Family and Friends to Accept Islam at your Hands!
May we all meet in Jannat Al Firdaus
Aameen Ya Rabbul Aameen!
Are you Korean?
@@Lonewold.Ameen🤲🏼
@@muriahmad501dutch
Salaams Mr Williams. I find your content to be well researched and every informative. As a person who was born Muslim I am embarrassed to say my knowledge is wholly inadequate. Shukar Alhamdullilah for all the resources available online. Jazakallah khair for your excellent content.
wa alaikum assalam and many thanks!
As Salamu Alaikum Brother William I have been listening to your talks, Alhamdulillah Allah has given you such ilm (knowledge) which he gives to very few people may Allah bless, you and save you.
If allah was a cold blooded reptile wouldnt paradise be very warm?
Allah is the 3rd as we the 4th
Sa’d ibn Abi Waqqas (ra) reported: We were sitting with the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and he said, *“Shall I not tell you of something by which a man among you can supplicate to relieve the hardships or trials of the world when they descend?”* They said, “Of course!”
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, “It is the prayer of Jonah, Dhul Nun:
لَّآ إِلَٰهَ إِلَّآ أَنتَ سُبۡحَٰنَكَ إِنِّي كُنتُ مِنَ ٱلظَّٰلِمِينَ
There is no God but You, glory be to You for I have certainly been among the wrongdoers.” (21:87)
Source: al-Sunan al-Kubrá lil-Nasā’ī 10416
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
Who's Albani?
@@mackbedunduk1305 a Muhaddith, a Scholarly/Expert in Narrations in Islam.
What’s this got to do with the topic of this video?
@@sabrunjamyylun2573
NOTHING! BUT!
*THE MESSENGER OF ALLAH (ﷺ) SAID:*
May Allah brighten the face of a person who hears a tradition from us and he memorizes it until he can convey it to others. Perhaps he will convey it to one who understands better than him, and perhaps one who conveys knowledge does not understand it himself.
Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 3660
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
*AND HE ALSO SAID*
The Prophet (ﷺ) said:
Convey (my teachings) to the people even if it were a single sentence.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 3461
*AND ALLAH ﷻ SAYS IN THE QURAN*
[Surah Adh-Dhāriyāt: 55]
But ˹continue to˺ remind. For certainly reminders benefit the believers.
The fastest healer if you are troubled by negative thoughts, especially of the past.
Praising from a Pakistani living in saudi Arabia ... prays for your life and knowledge and may ALLAH accept your efforts
This video made me think about this vers
فَوَيْلٌۭ لِّلَّذِينَ يَكْتُبُونَ ٱلْكِتَـٰبَ بِأَيْدِيهِمْ ثُمَّ يَقُولُونَ هَـٰذَا مِنْ عِندِ ٱللَّهِ لِيَشْتَرُوا۟ بِهِۦ ثَمَنًۭا قَلِيلًۭا ۖ فَوَيْلٌۭ لَّهُم مِّمَّا كَتَبَتْ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَوَيْلٌۭ لَّهُم مِّمَّا يَكْسِبُونَ ٧٩
So woe to those who distort the Scripture with their own hands then say, “This is from Allah”-seeking a fleeting gain! So woe to them for what their hands have written, and woe to them for what they have earned.
2:79
8 How can you say, "We are wise, for we have the law of the Lord,"
when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?
9 The wise will be put to shame; they will be dismayed and trapped.
Since they have rejected the word of the Lord, what kind of wisdom do they have? [NIV Jeremiah 8:8-9]
@mr.safensound4238 this whole video and others on this channel and the books of scholars like barth urmin say other wise
@badroboudjerda4394 Yes, that's the point. Jeremiah is from the Bible itself and identified the issue for them. So God continued to send them Prophets to correct what was falsified until we got the final revelation, the Qur'an.
One might also ask how the rules concerning the copying of religious texts by scribes came about unless there had been some cause.
You really open my eyes to so many things Paul. Thank you. This video was absolutely fascinating.
Glad you enjoyed it!
When the serpent in the Garden of Eden spoke to Eve, and she believed what the serpent said, her eyes also were open.
@jannievorster3371 Did the serpent present evidences to his claims, facts that could be fact checked, sources that could be analysed. Or did the serpent play on the emotions and urged pure blind faith?
Think about that
@@jannievorster3371did the serpent present fact checked arguments?
@jannievorster3371 that story was copied from ancient Iraqi stories
Terima kasih.
Many thanks!
Ma sha Allah
Well researched and objective presentation of useful information. May God bless you, Paul Williams.
Glad it was helpful!
asSALAMUALAIKum
I'm Malaysian we have got the dead sea scroll for few years ago .
Anyway thank you for bringing up this topic.
My salutation to you.
جزاكم الله خيرا أستاذنا الفاضل بول وليامز على كل ماتقدمه في هذه القناة
وأشكرك جزيل الشكر ل تعريفنا ب الدكتور علي عطائي
نفعنا الله تعالى بك و بالدكتور علي ❤
Jazek Allah khier for clarification Brother 🙏
Thanks for making video on Dead Sea Scrolls.
So Hebrew scriptures from the Tanakh in the Dead Sea Scrolls would lack the type of phonetic vowel markings that were standardized much later in time; is that right?
Songs of Solomon
5:11
His head is as the finest gold; his locks are curled, [they are as] black as a raven.
Rashi comments on the meaning of "his head is as gold", saying: "[it] glistens like the finest gold. כֶּתֶם is a term referring to the treasures of kings which they store in their treasure houses, and similarly, (Lam. 4:1): “[How] changed is the fine gold jewelry (הַכֶּתֶם) ,” and similarly, (Job 31:24): “and to jewelry (לַכֶּתֶם) I said, ‘My confidence,’” and similarly, (Prov. 25:12): “and jewelry of finest gold (כָתֶם).”
So this man is being described as a King. He isn't literally wearing a physical crown, but his head is still like the purest gold. This indicates spiritual and social status.
Rashi then mentions that "hair as black as a raven" is a quality of beauty. This is what verse 11 literally says in Hebrew:
rō-šōw ke-ṯem pāz
his head [is] like gold; (the) finest
qəw-wṣ-ṣō-w-ṯāw tal-tal-lîm
his locks; wavy (like palm-branches)
This is quite a strange literary device. This particular form only occurs in this verse. The Brown-Driver-Briggs dictionary says: "envelope or sheath of spadix of date-palm, with which hair is often compared in Arabic poetry", and that's why it's usually translated as "locks of wavy hair", but they aren't exactly sure what it means. They take that meaning from Arabic poetry, as there's no Biblical passage that uses this word, and nowhere else are any similar forms ever translated to mean "bushy locks". These are two nouns, by the way. So it's actually quite a difficult expression to translate.
šə-ḥō-rō-wṯ kā-‘ō-w-rêḇ
(and) [they are] black like a raven
Note that the word for "(like a) raven" there is very similar to "(like an) Arab", if you'd subtly change it.
In Ezekiel 27:21, it says עֲרַב֙
In Genesis 8:7, it says עֹרֵ֑ב
The first ‘ă·raḇ means Arabia, whereas ‘ō-rêḇ in Genesis is a crow.
Job 38:41 עֹרֵ֗ב
Psalm 83:11 עֹרֵ֣ב
The first ‘ō-rêḇ is a crow, while ‘ō·rêḇ in the Psalm is a proper noun and name: Oreb (a name of a Midianite, and of a cliff near the Jordan river).
Job 24:5 עֲרָבָ֥ה
That's ‘ă-rā-ḇāh, which now means desert or wilderness.
Isaiah 13:20 עֲרָבִ֔י
Nehemiah 2:19 הָֽעַרְבִ֔י
This says ‘ă·rā·ḇî, which means an Arab, or an Arabian. Nehemiah reads hā-‘ar-ḇî, meaning "the Arab".
The point being that "crow" and "Arab" are extremely similar in writing, and pronunciations differ only because of small diacritics.
If the text hasn't been properly preserved, and isn't 100% intact, then another reading of šə-ḥō-rō-wṯ kā-‘ō-w-rêḇ might have said: "(and) [his hairs are] black like an Arab"
The preposition kā here doesn't necessarily literally mean 'a resemblance', as kāna in Arabic can mean "to be", because ka- can mark the present tense. Kayqūl ma bḡa means "he says (presently) what he wants" and it wouldn't mean that 'it's similar to' "saying what he wants". Consider: "His head (is) as the finest gold, (and) his locks (are) black as an Arab('s typically are)". I've often wondered if my inquiry (and pseudo analysis) here could be valid, and if the scribes could've 'tweaked' the word, in order to change the meaning. After all, why would this text be describing an Arab? To them, that must've sounded strange. Maybe some ancient scribe thought that he was about to copy a previously made error, and that he needed to correct it. Other geographic designations, however, are used in Songs 5 to describe aspects of this individual and/or others (e.g. Lebanon and Jerusalem).
Jeremiah 3:2 כַּעֲרָבִ֖י
Songs 5:11 כָּעוֹרֵֽב
Ka·‘ă·rā·ḇî from Jeremiah literally means "like an Arab", while kā·‘ō·w·rêḇ in Songs 5:11 means "like a raven".
עֲרָבִי
עֹרֵב
Arabian: Ayin, Resh, Bet
Raven: Ayin, Resh, Bet
If we omit the Kaf in Jeremiah 3:2, it leaves us with the letters Ayin, Resh, Bet, but when we omit the Kaf in Songs, we have Ayin, Waw, Resh, Bet. Why is that? Why does it include the Waw here? Can anyone comment on that? "Raven" in Job 38:41, Genesis 8:7 and "Oreb" in Psalm 83:11 all lack a Waw. I don't understand why Songs' "raven" is spelled as A-W-R-B. It seems to be the only instance "raven" is written like that.
Isaiah 34:11
wə-yan-šō-wp̄ wə-‘ō-rêḇ
and the owl and the raven
Here, וְעֹרֵ֖ב is spelled as A-R-B, as seems to be typical. Also, I can't really detect a rhyme scheme in the text, but I don't know Hebrew, so I'm not entirely sure there is none, and if there is; how it's structured. The previous verse ends with mê-rə-ḇā-ḇāh, and then verse 10 ends with šə-ḥō-rō-wṯ kā-‘ō-w-rêḇ, and in the middle of 12 it says rō-ḥă-ṣō-wṯ be-ḥā-lāḇ. Again, this is highly speculative on my part, and rooted in ignorance, but mê-rə-ḇā-ḇāh - šə-ḥō-rō-wṯ kā-‘ă·rāḇ - rō-ḥă-ṣō-wṯ be-ḥā-lāḇ kinda sounds more like a pattern to me.
I looked up this chapter in the Dead Sea Scrolls, but it appears they haven't translated this part yet, or it doesn't exist in the scrolls. I could only find a translation of the first verse:
Lover
1 I have come into my garden, my sister, my bride.
I have gathered my myrrh with my spice;
I have eaten my honeycomb with my honey;
I have drunk my wine with my milk.
I have eaten my honeycomb with my honey;
Friends! Eat, friends! Drink, yes, drink abundantly, beloved.
And this is filled with sidenotes. Different words, words with different spellings, English words supplied to make it readable wherever words are missing, etc. I think only six words of the above translation are identical to the traditional text. The rest all seem to be problematic in one way or another. At the top it says about this chapter: "Translation process is ongoing." This translation is from the 4Q107 Canticles (manuscript), labled 6Q6? I assume this describes the cave it's been found in, at Qumran. It's dated to 30 B.C - 68 A.D. The site says there are 4 scrolls containing (parts or fragments of) Songs of Solomon. Yet, verse 1 is all they got for chapter 5? Kinda meager, no? I don't know how up-to-date this particular website is. And I'm curious if 5:11 is included, and (if so), how it 'could' be read.
No printing press , they relied on hand writing of people who could make one mistake and pass it on to everyone. While Muslims relied on memorization of the Quran and were always corrected by each other especially when they lead prayers
The printing press was used at some point once it was introduced to the rest of Europe
@@harharharharharharharharha240yeah, around 4000 years after Moses
I can grant you that the Qur’ān is preserved but the only implications that would follow is that it goes back to muhammad, not that it’s true.
@@sacredriderMoses probably didn’t even exist
@@Sosarchives thats just your assumption. The fact it’s been preserved for 1450 years, Allah himself said He would preserve it in the Quran, says something. Allah also says he made it easy to remember, and we have 6-7 year olds who memorized the entire Quran , that also says something
in the book of Isiah (from dead sea scroll)
chapter 42 verse 11 it is written...
"Let the desert cry out, its cities and the villages that Kedar inhabits, and let the inhabitants of Sela sing for joy. Let them shout aloud from the tops of the mountains."
Kedar was the son of Ismail As and also sela is the mountain in medinah just 500 metres away from masjid nabwi. So the prophecy of Hazrat Muhammad SA is there in the dead sea scrolls
YOU'RE RIGHT 👍
ALHAMDULILLAH 😊
yeah i have seen that verse but in another isiah chapter it says that the man will be blind and deaf??
@@hahaloser3914 could you please tell me the chapter and verse?
i think the one i refer to may be a newer version cause its in chapter 42 verse 11, so its corrupted probably
@@hahaloser3914you may be referring to other scroll because there were many pages found but
The only scroll which was found from start to end was book of isiah
and in that chapter 42 verse 11 Muhammad SAW sign is there
Thanks
Was waiting for this video for a long time, thank you brother Paul!
Thanks for sharing Paul and helping to enlighten us, via Bart Ehrman of course 🙂
Very informative talk. Thank you, brother.
Glad it was helpful!
Thanks
Many thanks!
two silver scroll amulets from the Ketef Hinnom archaeological site are the oldest pieces of the Torah ever found in the world. The scrolls were discovered in 1979 and were estimated to be from around the late seventh or early sixth century BCE. The two small strips of silver contain what is known as the Priestly Benediction, from the Book of Numbers (the fourth book of the Torah), making it the oldest biblical passage ever found on an ancient artifact.
The curse tablet of Mount Ebal about 1000 BCE
I’m glad you did search on that, because Christian will say the Dead Sea scrolls confirmed bible preservation, thanks for these enlightenment and Alhamdullilahi for Islam and peace and blessings of be unto the last prophet Muhammad sallahu alaihi wasallam , his family and the sahaba for the Quran compilation and preservation Amin
Christ in the old testament refutes the quaran
ruclips.net/video/1wrcyuOLFBM/видео.htmlsi=ioRBd-Ab1bj4VkK6
Thank you for sharing.
Excellent stuff! May Allah reward you, Paul.
👋👍Excellent presentation! It's well known that the Hebrew Bible was 'corrected' by Jewish scribes around 800 BCE (after the end of the Bronze Age). Seems like Mr B. Ehrman's book confirms that. Definitely worth reading it!
That’s interesting considering the book of Daniel is believed to have been written during the Babylonian captivity 605-530BCE.
@@georgiacap9294 Yes, but Esther is later and Brat needs to reform his late Daniel hypothesis based on the DSS fragments. The video totally omits many facts on a complex subject, probably because he's pushing a fake interpretation on The Passion.
Also in the scroll is a group who followed someone they called the righteous teacher 150-100 years before Jesus and many things in gospels were clearly taken from this group, for all we know the gospel writers were probably part of this group
Thank you, brother Paul.
Welcome!
Perfect! This book requires a few more segments of exposition.
Subhanallah. The Book of Isaiah is said to contain the prophecy of our beloved Muhammad SAW. Recalling Dr Ali Ataie earlier talk w brother Paul.
Lovely piece sir. Salam from KL
wa alaikum assalam
You do not know how right you are on Isaiah.
Paul, the scriptures of Ethiopia are at the root of all Semitic languages, sad that the English universities doesn't have any research of the ancient languages of that area. I wish there were.
Salaam brother Paul. Moses AS could not have lived 2-2,5000 BCE as Ramesis the second (pharaoh of exodus) lived about 1200 BCE. Furthermore, Yusuf AS was most likely in Egypt during the Hyksos era which was only about 1500BCE
Yh 1200BCE was about to say
why do you think it was the time of ramesis? we should rely on what the companions told about the pharaoh of Musa a
Isn't the Torah in the Samaritan group different from the Torah in the Masoretic group?
Love your channel!! Keep the good work
Great informative video. Really appreciate your time and dedication on researching and most of all sharing what you've learnt in a short summary which would otherwise be unavailable to many.
Thank you. Nice information
i assure you, in the library at the vatican are texts locked away most likely older than the leningrad codex, but they would destroy narratives.
Thank you so much. For long, I'd been looking for something reliable about this subject. I'm there now.
If I may ask, can we accept that the Palestinians are true ancient Judeans?. Please advise.❤
Hi brother Paul , I hope you doing well , I have a question. What is opinion of western scholarship on book (Acts of apostles) in the bible ?
بارك الله فيكم...
اللهم اغفر لوالدينا و ارحمهما و اجمعنا معهما في الفردوس الأعلى مع الأنبياء و الشهداء و الصالحين و جميع موتى المسلمين..
اللهم احقن دماء المسلمين و انصرهم على من عاداهم..
رب إني مسني الضر و أنت أرحم الراحمين...
لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين.....
.'''''''
..............
.
................................
Very interesting, does the book give some examples of the differences found in the dead sea scrolls?
Yep
I never skip your Ads!!
Thanks Paul sharing for this, quite an interesting one. I’d suggest you to search Dr. Zafer Duygu and his works on this subject, he’s one of the most knowledgeable and highly respected researchers in Turkey on this matter, his main studies are about the evidences of the historical transformation of Christianity and Judaism and the Scriptures. Maybe you can invite him one day to your platform.
Tbh, the terms "Complete Bible" is kinda missleading at this point.
what I mean is that we dont have the "Complete Bible" today, as we all know some individuals make their own version of "Complete Bible". and on top of that, the exegeses from the church and the layman are kinda full of missguidance and all over the place as well from the "Complete Bible" itself.
15:40 About the "Book of Isaiah" I wonder why it preserve like that. hmm
Even if one presumes that the Bible is "complete", which of one the Bibles that would be Catholic or Protestant?
@wejie or Orthodox ones?🔬
@Dawah_Help
Yes. Orthodox and Ethiopian etc etc
@@wejie The Qur'an cites extant biblical scriptural sources extensively.
@nickmansfield1
It does?
Can you quote any verse in the Quran that the Quran has taken from the Bible?
Beautifully done! May Allah increase you In imaan and us as well.
Christians would reply to this argument by saying
' I saw jesus in my dream and my life changed after that, Hallelujah, hence christianity must be true'
Nope, the implications for the “late” composition for the Pentateuch is that Abrahamic religion in general isn’t true. You guys can quote all the scholars but they all agree that moses, abraham and adam didn’t even exist.
and it’s precisely due to the documentary hypothesis 😊
@@SosarchivesIslam don't depends upon those at all. This video only proves that the bible is not preserved and forged.
@@maruf2050 and those “forgeries” and “preservation” are the very reason scholars argue that the patriarchs are mythological
@@Sosarchives Quran stands alone.
@@maruf2050 the quran stands amongst other texts of late antiquity
I NEEDED THIS thank you Pauk😊
Alhamdulillah
Nice review and explanation Paul
Can you give any specific spots where these 15% discrepancies are? Verses.
3:20 Paul, Moses didn't live 2000 or 2500BCE, not by any historical account. Definitely within 1450-1250BCE, this being the 18th or 19th dynasty of Egypt.
yes indeed
Thank you Paul.. ❤ just like a jurnal speaking to us... 😅
اللهُمَّ حَاسِبْنِي حِسَابًا يَسِيرًا
*O Allah, grant me an easy reckoning*
[Allāhumma ḥāsibnī ḥisāba-y-yasīrā.]
[Musnad Aḥmad 24215]
•
Aisha (رضي الله عنها) reported:
The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said:
Whoever is fully taken to account on the Day of Resurrection will be punished.”
I said, “Has not Allah Almighty said: He will soon have an easy reckoning?” (84:8) The Prophet said, “That is not the reckoning, for it is only the presentation of deeds. Whoever is interrogated for his account will be punished.”
•Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2876
It is indeed a fact that the Hebrew script had adopted the Arabic system of ‘inflections.’
Wrt to the Dead Sea Scrolls, I urge people to read the book ‘The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception’ by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh.
Asalaam aleikum bro paul talking old ancient scrolls..how old is that old wall behind you ?😉
😆
It's the atmosphere, talk about making subtle efforts too!
3:20 I think it is the Leningrad manuscripts 1010 CE. or around that time!
Very informative video. A question, some muslims claim that within the book of Isaiah, there is a prophesy of Muhammed. Is there credibility to this claim?
Yes see Isaiah 42 ruclips.net/video/dQlulHHHerU/видео.htmlsi=PSR19drZLuPCnjsp
There is a whole lot more.
May Allah bless you sir Paul. ❤
Kind Sir...is there ANY "Hebrew" New Testaments any where? If so, where are they?
Check out Shem Tov's Hebrew Matthew.
@@jennifersilves4195 Thank you
@@jennifersilves4195 Thank you dear person. So I researched the Shem To's Hebrew Matthew. And I do not believe what this video kind Sir is right. So I will comment above. Thanks again Brethren.
Dr Kipp Davis is an expert in the DSS, he's also active on YT. Would be an epic crossover if you feature him, he has many insights I find very helpful!
Thank you brother Paul by briefly analysis book about biblical from dead sea scrools by Bart Erhman...🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Very interesting paul. I wonder could you recommend your top 10 books for those who want to do a more scholarly study of christianity than what the main line churches offer. Perhaps a video
"Woe, then, to those who write the book with their hands and then say: This is from Allah, so that they may take for it a small price; therefore woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they earn."
Qur'an 2:79
Can you discuss how much the Dead Sea scrolls are significant for Samaritan theology?
i pray for your good health, may allah keep you safe and healthy in both world.
Awesome academic stuffs bro Paul William
The Gospel of Barnabas was hunted down and destroyed along with the Unitarian Church.
you mean a medieval forgery😂
@Sosarchives Carbon dated 1500 year old copy before Islam ☪️.
@@mohammedzulk8485 no. It isnt 🤦♂️
@@mohammedzulk8485 it’s literally a late medieval italian pseudepigraphal work
nah brother, don't follow any video u see.
it's a forgery. & stop using this symbol it has nothing to do with Islam nor the prophet told us to use a symbol. It's a late innovation by Otthomans. @@mohammedzulk8485
Paul, try wear batik, I think it'll suits you well.
Great channel, great video as usual
Thank you Paul for reviewing the book.The text is not cheap as it is produced by Bart Ehrman with the primary interest to make money for Mr. Ehrman.
Thanks!
Favourite channel
Alhamdulillah. I learned more about Dead sea scrolls. My Allah rewards you abundantly, brother Paul. Have you make a video of discussion with dead sea scrolls expert, Dr Eisenman?
Can we have a similar video like this about the early manuscripts of the Quran and how it is different from the Bible's?
Listen to what brother Paul says towards the end of the video.
in quran. no passover infanticide. no worldwide noah flood [ regional]. no stoning to death these are the main reasons folks leave the Bible
@@mariokart6118 Yes, I want him to expand on that. Or if I missed a video he's done, just a link to that one.
Assalamualikum. Br Williams. Have you written a book 📕 about the preservation of the bible ?
Good to know
Have you done any reading from the Nag Hammadi? Says to have some gospel that were left out from the bible, very interesting.
Again a great informative and interesting video, Alhamdulliah that Allah gave us Paul so that we can be informed about such intricate matters.
What is the Arabic meaning of prophet Isa name
@@MasudFahim-h2i Zero.
Thanks for sharing Paul. I think you’d really enjoy the book “The Lost Bible:Forgotten Scriptures Revealed” by JR Porter. Such an interesting book!
17:55 *Devil* detail -ed
Who *is*
T *he* A u t h o r of
The B *i b l e s ?*
???
😍
@@harharharharharharharharha240
If you don't understand what I mean please excuse me , English is not my mother tongue , although I was really touched by the late Queen
thank you for this video, but one thing that bothered me is that in the early parts of your video you mention dates an centuries allot, but in the later parts of the video you talk about books and new and old testament and the canon, but you don't talk about when those are? could you add a pinned comment or description with timestamps when you talk about books from which century or time it was from.
He was also shy on references for his information.
Thank God for preserving the Quran
3:17
6:30
C 7:35
8:30, 8:53
11:02, 14:41 15:33, 16:18, 16:36, 17:44
Allahumma barik
Codex Sinaticus 350?? What Did Uthman Burn???
May Almighty Allah Bless You.
I suggest discussing the book Dialogue of Civilizations (A Doctrinal Study in Light of the Qur’an and Sunnah) Author: Fahd bin Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah Al-Sunaidi Supervision: Dr. Mazen bin Salah Mutabaqani. It is written in Arabic.
Ehrman is a New Testament scholar, not a Hebrew Bible-Dead Sea Scrolls scholar. Here's what some scholars of the Hebrew Bible and DSS say about the matter, including one of your favourites, Geza Vermes:
"We have seen that the consonantal text of the Tiberian Masoretic tradition [i.e., the text of the Leningrad Codex] can be traced back into the earliest attested manuscripts from the Second Temple period (third century B.C.E.) and, on the basis of orthography, [spelling] can be carried back further, possibly to the time of Ezra."
-- Khan, Geoffrey, A Short Introduction to the Tiberian Masoretic Bible and its Reading Tradition, Georgias Press, 2013, p. 63
"The Dead Sea Scrolls partly confirm and partly question the reliability of the wording of the Bible handed down by Jewish tradition. On the one hand, as was shown in chapter VI, ****the Qumran Scripture is substantially identical with that passed on by the Synagogue from the time of Jesus to the present age.**** On the other hand, the Dead Sea Scrolls furnish documentary proof of what has been surmised before, namely that, prior to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE, unity was not yet achieved and different forms of the Hebrew text coexisted, showing verbal and stylistic variations, additions, omissions and changes in the order of textual arrangement. Before the Qumran discoveries, we presumed that the Samaritan Bible (restricted to the five books of the Law of Moses), the form of the Hebrew Bible from which the ancient Greek version, known as the Septuagint, was translated, and the type of the text that was to evolve into the traditional (Masoretic) Hebrew Old Testament, existed side by side in different social groups. Qumran has corroborated this theory and has ****demonstrated that diversity could obtain in one and the same group. This phenomenon implies that the variant readings in the biblical text do not represent corruptions or deliberate alterations, but can just as well, if not better, echo earlier discrete written traditions.****"
-- Vermes, Geza, The Story of the Scrolls, Penguin Books, 2010, pp. 213-214
there are two main torahs. masoretic and samaritan torahs
@@aaronmusa234
Samaritan and Masoretic Torah are essentially the same text.
@@ConsideringPhlebas nah son not even close. ask any rabbi
@@aaronmusa234
That's cute. Actual textual scholarship disagrees.
@@ConsideringPhlebas Good work pointing out the obvious in your initial comments but the Greek, Samaritan, DSS are all more closely related to each other in terms of Moses than the Leningrad and Allepo traditions, see Tsedaka. Another comment here has pointed out that Ge'ez manuscripts are under-researched, something most people are unaware of. Rabbi Singer seems to say that the Jewish literature also fully contains the Masoretic tradition. Nehemia Gordon points out that no two ancient Torah scrolls are the same.
Thank you and may the Almighty creator of all things reward you in this and the next life 😍
Make more 23min videos brother. Thanks 👍
I wish all God fearing seekers of truth could listen to your words, particularly those who currently live in Israel.
Alhumdulillah for Islam
my question is : has verses been added ? is there added verses between dead sea scrolls and leningrad codex or todays hebrew bible ?
Fascinating
The Dead Sea scrolls confirm the info in surah Al kahf. According to historians the Essenes lived in caves for 300 years and they used a solar calendar unlike other Israelites who used a lunar calendar. This is confirmed in surah Al kahf where Allah almighty is pulling our attention to / with the mathematical conversion (300 years and 309 years) one is solar calendar years and the other is Lunar calendar years. This info was only discovered after the Dead Sea scrolls were discovered
They were a Tsadokim sect, not Essenes.
Notice the slight of hand (deception). Williams says (3:44) the oldest "complete manuscript", which he means a complete copy of the old testament, that we have is the Leningrad codex which dates from the year "1000 CE". Then (6:43) williams gives muslims "a footnote" by comparing the Leningrad codex with the koran. The example he gives is the Birmingham manuscript. But, this is his deception trick, because he is comparing the COMPLETE Leningrad bible with three suras in Birmingham. So he is not comparing a complete bible with a complete koran. He is comparing a complete bible with SCRAPS of the/A koran in Birmingham, whose scraps text are not completely identical to the same suras you have today.. If paul used equal scales, there are old testament manuscript scraps too, that are older than the Leningrad codex. Much older.
The ketef Hinnom scrolls which has material from leviticus and deuteronomy is dated at the "late 7th century or early 6th century BCE. 1000 years older than islam!
So instead on comparing fragment for fragment, like the ketef hinnom scroll with the three suras in Birmingham, williams deliberately deceives his audience into thinking that he is comparing a complete koran with the complete Leningrad codex, when he is not doing so at all. Even right before he tries to make a comparison with the Birmingham manuscript three suras, he says "but not even among the Dead Sea scrolls did we find complete manuscripts OF THE ENTIRE HEBREW BIBLE". But the Birmingham manuscripts are NOT "the entire" koran. It is just three suras. Williams even calls the three suras of the Birmingham manuscript (6:49) "copies of the koran". It is not a copy of the koran. Birmingham manuscripts are only three suras.
So is williams just stupid or is he corrupt? You decide. There can be no other possible explanations for why williams did what he did.
I don't know why muslims accept such charlatans tricking muslims into believing false information. What it does show though is that Williams is very corrupt. If you are going to teach something, teach it. Don't corrupt and distort the facts in hope that no one would notice. I have placed the time stamps in this post so you can go and see for yourselves the trick williams tries to pull off. And then ask yourselves, is this what you want, someone to deceive you and lead you into believing a lie? And then ask yourselves, what time of person does that? Someone who actually believes in God, or an atheist who is free to lie and distort without fear of divine judgement? Or is, that Williams thinks his god allah approves of the deception if it makes islam look better than it really is?
Both , the Torah and the Quran were orally revealed. The Muslims memorized the Quran from beginning and passed it down to the next generations we still can trace back to Muhammad (saw) , the Torah we have today cannot be traced back to Moses (as) as it was written today. The Quran also has these complete manuscripts like the Samarkand codex , only removed by 150 years from Muhammad (saw) , meanwhile the oldest full manuscript of the Old Testament is removed 1300 years from Moses (as) and the oldest complete bible is removed 350 years from Jesus (as) in a foreign language. So to sum up , the oral memorization is better perfectly preserved in Islam and the oldest manuscript of the Quran is more near to Muhammad (saw) than the other scriptures that are removed by 350 to 1300 years to their prophets lifetime
@@As_412 So you don't have a response to anything I said? Ok. Cool.
Can anybody help me : *Do we have Genesis22:2* in The Dead Sea Scroll
"Worship none but Allah "
[Quran 11:2]
5:50 why
The earliest complete copy of the New Testament is the 4th century older than Muhammad and the Quran.
So?, doesn't matter what time Quran was revealed because it's from god to correct the corrupted scripture before it.
@@faiqdzihnan That is exactly being questioned: is it truly from God of the Bible?
Now if the Quran is not referring to the God of Jesus Christ then it would seem Allah has no history before the 7th century as if someone made him up.
You can't have it both ways, you can't claim you worship the God of Abraham then have the Quran contradict all scriptures written before the 7th century.
@@smidlee7747 do you know why there are so many prophets in the first place?. Because human always changed/corrupted the teaching of the prophet. Every prophet taught monotheism, not trinity. Why is there no prophet after Muhammad pbuh?, because quran is preserved.
@@smidlee7747 ask any rabbis which religion is closer/similar to Judaism. They'll answer Islam, not Christianity.
@@faiqdzihnan No because the law demands there is at least two witnesses for something to be established and so someone doesn't become proud and think he is God's special pet... like Muhammad.
Jesus came to fulfill the law and prophets so John the Baptist was the last prophet.
Of course Muhammad is not the last one claiming to be a prophet , Joseph Smith , Warren Jeffs who is now in prison claimed to be a prophet. Like Muhammad they were solo prophets.
Didn't the Hebrew language change over 1000 years until the Leningrad version? I am sure some words creep into it, some words acquire new meaning or additional meanings?