Jazak Allah Khair Shaykh Asrar. I pray to Allah that Deobandi scholars may act maturely and think for a while about their Ulemas and whom they are following. May Allah keep you safe and healthy, Ameen!
@@Insaniya.humanity from my experience learning doing both is important from a sunni scholar in the same day but 2 different classes that's what is important
Maa shaa Allah shaiykh! I have listened the whole discussion... may Allah kareem give you more barakah and may he preserve you from every wrong and harm ... aameen
Ya Shaik I wish I could Learn Islam With You.. Iam taking Halaqat with the HT and Also with other shuke But it is not A lot Want to Seriously learn Islam, Masha Allah And Jazakallahu khairan.. For your videos...
Deoband stance on Abdul Wahhaab is clear by the way. Mawlānā Rashīd Ahmad Gangohī writes, “People call Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb ‘Wahhābi’. He was a good person, and I have heard (sunā hey) that he follows the Hanbali School of thought and acts upon the Hadith. He used to prevent people from Shirk and innovation, but he was harsh in his attitude.”[12] He also writes, “The followers of Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb are known as Wahhabis. They had good beliefs and their school of thought was Hanbali. They were very stringent in their attitude but he and his followers were good people. Yes, those who exceeded the limits were overcome by wretchedness. The belief of all is the same, and the difference they have in actions is like that of the Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki and Hanbali schools of thought.”[13] Muftī Mahmūd al-Hasan Gangohī states in his Fatāwā that, Mawlānā Rashīd Ahmad Gangohī was initially unaware of Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb’s ideology, because he was initially known in the Subcontinent as a reformer of Sunnah, and one who strived greatly in rejecting Bid‘ah and establishing the Sunnah. As such, Mawlānā Rashīd Ahmad also said that his opinion was based on what he had heard, for a Muslim should always hold good opinions about other Muslims until it is proven otherwise. Thereafter, Mawlānā Rashid Ahmad’s teacher sent him the copy of Radd al-Muhtar wherein ‘Allāma ibn ‘Abidīn clearly refuted Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb. ‘Allāma ibn Abidīn states, “…as it has occurred in our times with the followers of (Muhammad b.) Abdul Wahhāb, who appeared from Najd and imposed their control over the two sacred Harams. They used to attribute themselves to the Hanbalī School but they believed that only they were Muslims and that whoever opposed their beliefs were polytheists. Thus they considered the killing of those who were from the Ahlus Sunnah and their scholars to be legitimate, until Allah Most High destroyed their might and power.” [14] Mufti Mahmūd al-Hasan states that had Mawlāna Rashīd Ahmad Gangohī read what ‘Allāmah Ibn ‘Abidīn stated in his Radd al-Muhtār regarding Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb and his movement, he would surely not have stated what he had in his Fatāwā. Moreover, the students of Mawlānā Rashīd Ahmad Gangohī clearly refuted the ideologies and actions of Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb and his movement. As will be mentioned, Mawlānā Khalil Ahmad Sahāranpūrī, a student of the Mawlānā Rashīd Ahmad Gangohī, stated in his book al-Muhannad ala al-Mufannad that he and his teachers hold the same view as ‘Allāmah ibn ‘Abidīn regarding Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb and his followers. This was agreed upon and signed by almost all of the major scholars of the Indian subcontinent, including Shaykh al-Hind Mawlānā Mahmūd Hasan Deobandī, Mawlānā ‘Azīzur Rahmān, Hakīmul Ummah Mawlānā Ashraf ‘Ali Thānawī, Mawlānā Habībur Rahmān Deobandī and many others. Mawlāna Khaīl Amad Sahāranpūrī sates: “Their (Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab and his adherents) ruling according to us is what the author of al-Durr al-Mukhtār said: ‘The Khawārij are a violent group that rebelled against ‘Ali due to an interpretation by which they believed that he was on falsehood and disbelief or disobedience making fighting him obligatory according to their interpretation. They legitimise our blood and our properties and take our women captives,’ until he said, ‘Their ruling is the ruling of rebels,’ and then he said, ‘We do not classify them as disbelievers because their actions are based on an interpretation although false.’ Al-Shāmī said in his commentary, ‘As has occurred in our time by the followers of ‘Abd al-Wahhab who came out from Najd and dominated the two Harams. He would claim to belong to the Madhhab of the Hanbalis but they believed that they are the only Muslims and those who disagreed with their belief are polytheists, and due to this, they legitimised the killing of the Ahlus Sunnah and ‘Ulamā until Allah broke their supremacy.’ “Then I (Mawlana Khalīl) say: Neither he nor any of his followers are from our Mashāyikh (mentors) in a chain from the chains of knowledge of jurisprudence, Hadith, Fiqh and Tasawwuf.”[15] Mawlāna Anwar Shāh Kashmīrī Kashmīrī writes, “As for Muhammad b. ‘Abdul Wahhāb Najdī, indeed he was a dull minded person with little knowledge. He would be hasty in passing a ruling of disbelief on others. It is not appropriate that any one traverses this valley (passing a judgement of disbelief) except if he is diligent and has mastered the scenarios of disbelief and its causes.”[16] Mawlānā Hussayn Ahmad Madanī writes, “Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb appeared in Najd in the 13th century A.H. He harboured evil thoughts and held wrong beliefs, due to which he waged war on the Ahlus Sunnah Wa al-Jamā‘ah. He attempted to force his evil thoughts upon them and considered their properties as spoils of war and their killing as a source of blessing and mercy. He was harsh on the people of the Haramayn in particular and on the people of the Hijāz in general. He spoke ill of the pious people of the early generations. Because of the atrocities committed by him, countless people had to flee the holy cities of Makkah and Madīnah, and many of them were martyred by his troops. In short, he was a tyrant, rebel and blood spilling transgressor.”[17] However, it is claimed that Mawlānā Husayn Ahmad Madanī retracted from his original view. This is based on a supposed statement made by Mawlānā Husain Ahmad Madanī produced in a newspaper named Zameendār in the year 1925/1343. [18]However, after comparing the date of his supposed retraction and other statements, it becomes evident that his final and only opinion was that mentioned in al-Shihāb al-Thāqib (the above mentioned quotation). Mawlānā Husayn Ahmad Madanī was asked if he had changed his opinion regarding Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb, and he replied, “Al-Shihāb al-Thāqib was my first book written as a refutation on Ahmad Raza Khān. I only mentioned the Wahhābi sect by the way in order to show that our predecessors had a very moderate approach.” He further writes, “I still hold on to the opinion expressed in this book and this is the opinion of my predecessors.” This statement was dated at 1950/1370 which is much later than his supposed retraction. Therefore, it is clear that Mawlānā Husayn Ahmad Madanī is also of the view that Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb and his followers were not of sound ideology.[19] Mawlāna Manzūr Nu‘mānī was of the opinion that Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb and his adherents were upon the truth and the allegations levelled against them were baseless. He writes, “After studying his life, I have realised that Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb encountered the same challenges that Shaykh Ismaīl Shahīd faced i.e. false accusations…His call to the oneness of Allah and efforts of reformation comprised of Jihād with the sword…”[20] Mawlānā Ahmad Bijnorī writes after proving that there are many differences between the Salafīs and the scholars of Deoband, “The respected scholar Manzūr Nu‘mānī feels that the differences between the Salafī movement and the scholars of Deoband are only in a few issues. He also claims that Shaykh al-Islām Mawlānā Husain Ahmad Madanī had retracted from his original view regarding Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb whereas in reality he only lessened his harshness against him.” [21] Muftī Mahmūd Gangohī Muftī Mahmūd writes, “Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb al-Najdī was a follower of the Sunnah but was extreme in his beliefs, statements and actions. He was a person of very little knowledge and understanding…..”[22] He also writes, “He claimed to follow the Sunnah hence, many people joined him. However, many of his views were contrary to the Sunnah…as his true colours began to show, many people left his group. It became apparent that his objective was to seize political power and his claim to follow the Sunnah was merely to attract a following.” [23] Conclusion The above quoted views of the senior ‘Ulamā of Deoband about Shaikh Muhammad b. ‘Abdul Wahhāb are clear. A mufti or sheik will only give a fatwa based on the knowledge and information which are presented to him.
aaj mai na kisi aleem e deen ko suna wo galiban daeo band tha ya salfi tou mera ilam bohot kam tou meri dil fitnay ka shikar hwa aur ajeeb say wisawis any lagy.. halat meri asi thi ki mujy ronay ka dil kar raha tha.. magr Allah shaikh asrar rashid kay ilam amal mai barktain ata karay enko sunnay k bad dil ko taskeen hwi... aur mujy ala hazrat ya wo mashoor shair yad aa raha hai.... ahl e sunnat ka hai bairdaa paar.. ashab e huzur najm hain aur noh hai itrat rasool Allah kip❤️
It'd be a massive help if you can break down the entire talk, by themes and minutes, in the description. Its a very long and beneficial discussion. Make it easier for people to follow.
Nice work sheikh,I am deobandi and where your school and our school gets distracted is when we blindly defend our shuyukh . .both schools have got weak aspects and combining both the schools will make an excellent hanafi school . .may Allah bring us to the ideal fiqh as of Shaykh Ahmed Sirhindi RA,Ameen!
Narrated Ibn `Umar: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Sham! O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Yemen." The People said, "And also on our Najd." He said, "O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Sham (north)! O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Yemen." The people said, "O Allah's Apostle! And also on our Najd." I think the third time the Prophet (ﷺ) said, "There (in Najd) is the place of earthquakes and afflictions and from there comes out the side of the head of Satan." Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab was a religious leader and theologian from Najd in central arabia who founded the movement now called wahhabism
MashAllah. Beautifully explained. Brothes and sisters, its important to research your deen. The more yoi study thw better your knowledge will be. May Allah Almighty guide us all to follow the correct way. Ameen
The best thing about the barelvi is that if there goes anyone out of the way or have some unorthodox aqeeda the other aalims of the same group oppose him hardly , which isn't found in case of deobandis .
That's why the barelvi guys are shy to call them selves barelvi. They call themselves Ahle Sunnat to mislead the ignorant masses. You know why ? They're hiding from the shirk teachings and aqaaid of their leaders.
If we teach Aqeedah and texts in both Barelwi and Deobandi that are pre Deobandi/barelwi .. sticking to the known Asha’ri/Maturidi Mutoon we can erase this issue within a generation .
Can you please pass my message over to Shaykh Asrar. It would be better to hold a series of lectures on each major point of ths Sunni Aqeeda in which we have differences with the non-Sunnis.
The guy in the white hat keeps talking about certain texts without giving any references. If he quotes then needs to provide proper reference. Or else he possibly is the one doing the trickery and deception
Assalamualaykum sheikh please speak about the political situation at the time of the establishment of the darul uloom deoband. Speak about how the British and Indian governments encouraged the deoband movement to split the Muslim ummah.make clear that the whole split was done by the zionist as the Indian Muslims were very loyal to our last Uthmania Khalifa.
Given that Nabeel Afzal is a Khalifah of Irfan Shah... and Sh. Asrar is a friend of Nabeel... their relationship must be awkward... that’s why I like Sh. Asrar- keeps it real
Dude that Usman guy thinks Asrar has tricks up his sleeves so he is so defensive... I don’t think he is capable of having debates as his hatred for Asrar is too much
No one says doing mawlid is shirk, rather it's a biddah, however the things people do and exclaim in the name of mawlid falls into shirk , like calling the deceased for help or intercession
Unless someone specifically assumes him equal to Allah that's when it becomes shirk otherwise it is teachings of Allah's friends like Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilani Radiallahu anhu quotes the Surah Nisa ayat 64 where Allah says "And We did not send any messenger except to be obeyed by permission of Allāh. And if, when they wronged themselves, they had come to you, [O Muḥammad], and asked forgiveness of Allāh and the Messenger had asked forgiveness for them, they would have found Allāh Accepting of Repentance and Merciful." Here Allah himself says to his slaves when he commits mistake, go to Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Alaihi Wa Sallam and ask him to pray Allah to forgive us, and surely Allah will accept your repentance and he is merciful. This ayat itself speaks about asking from Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Alaihi Wa Sallam, by the way it is not limited to particular era, if it was then it would have been an unjustice with us as we don't have the luxury to ask him to pray on our behalf. So many people have started learning Qur'an to satisf their nafs, that's the reason we are constantly out under punishment, let's understand Qur'an from pious people and followAllah and Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Alaihi Wa Sallam's instructions to succeed in our life. Hope this answers your doubt. Jazakallah khair.
Salam Alaikum , just wanted to say thank you for these videos,in the future can timestamps also be applied for certain topics? It would be greatly appreciated 😊
Sheikh should use his obvious intellect for hikmat of dean and not further confusion of the ummat with pointless debates that most of the laymen masses dnt even have the capacity to understand...these kinds of open aired debates and refutations do more damage to the ummat then benefit...ulamaa should have respectfull debates behind closed doors , and avoid cult like following and sectarianisms....this is damaging.may Allah guide and protect us all
Debates have always happened in the history of Islamic Scholarship, that too in public. Because in Islam, unlike other religions there is no discrimination between a scholar and a layman muslim in the matters of deen. Yes, there is a natural difference between the knowledge, piety and nature of a scholar in comparison to a layman. And since that's the case in Islam, knowledge is WAAJIB on every muslim, obligatory! And these debates even though they promote sectarianism(which is a natural byproduct of speaking for the haqq) are useful and beneficial for the ummah. Debates promote curiosity and curiosity promotes knowledge. So, in conclusion since our Deen doesn't discriminate between a layman and a scholar in matters of deen, it's necessary for everything to be out in the open which includes debates between the various sects on various issues as well as the debates result in the increase of knowledge of the layman and a chance for him to see the how the actual Islamic scholarship works!
Once I was in Pakistan, wearing a white thobe, white shawl and white turban, and went to a Barelawi mosque for Jumua'h. When they did qiyam for reading "Salat and Salam", I remained seated.
How can abu jahal and follower of yazeed is going to salaam my life prophet mohammad salllallahu alaiyhi wassalam is this is not your fault this is the fault of your mother that he birth from pig..
You must be against Shaikh of Deobandi movement's founder Haji Imdadullah Muhajir Makki, who used to celebrate Mawlid and approved salat o salam and qiyam for it.
@@AbdulKhader-786 so Ulema of Deoband refer to Mawlid as biddah does it also apply to Haji Imdadullah Muhajir Makki (r.a) or it only applies to other Sunnis?
Asrar Rashid should be using the references from Quran and hadith etc to justify the claims from malfoozat, All his doing is justifying from other books written by authors of brelwi and deobandi scholars, Asrar Rashid knows he cannot justify from any authentic sources the claims and stories which Ahmed rezas claims , all he does is justify with similar controversial texts this is not scholarship but rather just justification with anything
No he shouldn’t your ‘argument’ is nonsensical, Malfuzat wasn’t even written by Ahma Rida Khan whereas the Deobandiyah’s books were written by their authors. Do you affirm the statements they made?
@conjugatemethod , So who wrote malfoozat, was it Ahmed rezas son ? Also regarding deobandi or any other scholars books , if it agrees with Quran and sunnah and with the pious predecessors than only we accept it , otherwise we reject it , There is no one above Quran and sunnah
@@choma9007 first of all, one cannot judge someone from his malfuzaat, it is a principle. secondly, dawate islami has published malfuzat with all the references written down. so consider reading it before making any perception
1:02 "I believe this term deobandi or Barelwi,should not be utilized by people, they should refer to themselves as Sunni Muslims" Do you believe that Deobandis are Sunni and part of Ahl Sunnat Wal Jamaat?
An interesting video. On the topic of hadhir and nadhir I noticed a discrepancy. When Shaykh Asrar mentioned some Deobandis saying Allah is hadhir and nadhir, this is incorrect because it implies Allah is physically present everywhere whereas Allah is not confined to space. The point is made that it cannot be said hadhir and nadhir is an attribute of Allah. Fair enough. Now when it comes to Barelvis using the term hadhir and nadhir for Rasulullah salallahu alayhi wasalam, shaykh gives it a figurative meaning, saying it refers to the angels presenting our deeds to the Nabi as referred to in hadith. Why is it that for Deobandis we have to use the literal meaning. And for Barelvis they are given the liberty to have meant a figurative meaning? I think the whole contention with this is that the term hadhir and nadhir is not from the Quran and Sunnah. As such it should just be abandoned and stick to the words of the Quran and Sunnah. Shaykh says he is objective and not biased to any group, if that's the case then why insist on using the term hadhir nadhir just because some previous scholars used it. Its become a point of identity for the Barelvi group.
On topic of imkan al-kizb. The Deobandis can quote fatawa of their founders where they have said whoever believes that Allah speaks a lie is a clear kaafir. To me it looks like the whole discussion around this topic is an unnecessary theoretical debate that scholars on both sides dwelled into to flex their philosophical muscles. Both camps agree on the conclusion that Allah will never lie. The debate and confrontation is around what philosophical reasoning do they use to get to that conclusion. Some Deobandis opined that Allah has the Power to do whatever He wants, but He will not go against what He has said and ordered out of His Divine Will. Conclusion is the same: Allah will never lie. Shaykh Asrar and the Barelvis opine that Allah intrinsically cannot lie. Conclusion is the same: Allah will never lie. Again to me it looks like an unnecessary philosophical discussion that should be abandoned in favour of the clear and straight forward words from Quran and Sunnah.
Khuram Hussain - as to your objection regarding the hadhir nadhir issue then the problem is what follows this terminology. If you are claiming that its an unnecessarily convoluted topic which could be avoided by avoiding using the terminology then theoretically thats fine, however, due to the fact that it is used our issue is when people label the brelvis/sunnis as kuffaar for using these terms for the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم. The matter requires clarification due to this problem. As for the imkan kizb issue then yes both sides agree that Allah WILL never lie but that doesn't mean that Allah CANNOT lie. You refer to it as flexing philosophical muscles however the problems which arise from the first statement are too dangerous to ignore. Consider this. Someone asks you that if you claim Allah will never lie, but He can then how do you know the Quran is truthful? You will respond with, "Allah says so in the Quran." Their simple response which you will never be able to counter will be, "how do you know thats not a lie?" I think the qaida is that if the conclusion of something leads to an impossibility then what's lazim to it will also be impossible. (Been a while since I looked at the subject akhi.) Hope that helps somewhat akhi.
@@khuramhussain7162 There is a Major Diffrence: Deobandis Ascribed Attribute of Naqs (Falsehood) to ALLAH SUBHANUHU WA TAÀLA. While Ahlus Sunnah believe That ALLAH ﷻ IS FREE FROM any Attribute of Naqs (Aieb - like Falsehood, Being Cruel or Dishonest etc.). Any attributes of aeib is Muhaal for ALLAH ﷻ. As Quran Clearly Stated: سُبْحَٰنَ رَبِّكَ رَبِّ ٱلْعِزَّةِ عَمَّا يَصِفُونَ Purity is to your Lord, the Lord of Honour, from all what they say. 37-As-Saaffat : 180
Shaykh Asrar I am a fan of you.. But plz plz leave these types of sectarian debates even if someone ask you to jump in. Other people they laugh at us after watching these type of lectures. Jzk
Shud i stop going to deoband mosque???i used to listen to fazail amal which helped me greatly ...wat is your advise sheick ...my intention is learning aqeedah at tahawiya soon from an ustadh who have an ijazah in aqeeda ,fiqh and tazkiyyah...he studied in morroco qarramayn (something like that) university..he live in another city and is neither deobandi or barelwi by the look of it....i want to know if i can learn at tahawiyah from a mufti in my mosque which i go ,which is a deobandi mosque...please reply i am very stress and confused...the stuff of whether Allah can lie but choose not ...i reject it ..in fact i never learned this in the mosque ...i only learned it through ur video...i am not an expert to understand those mental gymnastics things...but if u say its wrong then i accept and reject it...btw u doing great work bridging the gap between the deobandi and barelwi muslims...in all this i blame the ulema of both these group...there are extreme barelwi who keep labeling people as gustakhi ect...i notice some of them on youtube comment seem to have a cult mentality...btw i refuse to label myself barelwi or deobandi ...
Brother, please inform Shaykh Asrar to only have Ulema discussing these issues of Aqeeda with him. May Allah bless the brother wearing Shalwar Qameez for helping in defending the Aqaid of the Ahlus Sunnah, however, it opens up opportunities for the Non-Sunnis to attack us due to the mistakes he makes as he must not be an Alim. He can help behind the scenes if he has good research on these topics, but in front of the camera is very damaging to us.
![Lil Uzi Vert - Chill Bae [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/D7F42F_JM3U/mqdefault.jpg)
This is why we'll love Shaykh Asrar Rashid
بِسْمِ ٱللَّٰهِ ٱلرَّحْمَٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ
00:00 - Introduction
23:33 - Hadhir and Nadhir
03:03:26 - 'Ilm ul Ghayb
03:48:06 - Why Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَى cannot lie
04:05:05 - The Pir Pandemic
What is the Hukm of Isthighasa?
Jazakallah
@@darthzifdar7384 you can visit shykh channel for it. It is permissible that what i can say .
I met Sh Asrar Rashid in person locally in our area....nice humble person....Masha'Allah
Please give me asrar rashid watsup details or Gmail
Jazak Allah Khair Shaykh Asrar. I pray to Allah that Deobandi scholars may act maturely and think for a while about their Ulemas and whom they are following. May Allah keep you safe and healthy, Ameen!
May Allah SWT preserve Shaykh Saab, I learnt how important aqeedah is in this video, watched this live. The attributes of Allah SWT.
Before aqueedah you need to learn Arabic. I believe the sheikh agrees with this, and Allah knows best
@@Insaniya.humanity all Islamic sciences are important.
@@Insaniya.humanity from my experience learning doing both is important from a sunni scholar in the same day but 2 different classes that's what is important
Sher E Raza Shykh Asrar Rashid Sb.
Wah Wah Subhanallah Hazrat I m ur fan from India......
MashaAlllah
Asrar sahab you are a great leader and scholar
I request you to come in Mumbai, India
جزاکم اللّہ تعالیٰ۔۔۔۔
شیخ اسرار رشید۔۔۔۔ you are presenting and defending pure and true aqida of AHLE SUNNAH WAL JAMA'AH
ruclips.net/video/U79a-7kRWJY/видео.html
This is related
Has any Swahaba performed Isthighasa?
Yes
@@ahmedrayees4281 Proof?
And what is hukm of Isthighasa?
Love shiekh asrar rashid may allah make u a greate awliya of allah and make u a guide for muislims insha allah
Maa shaa Allah shaiykh! I have listened the whole discussion... may Allah kareem give you more barakah and may he preserve you from every wrong and harm ... aameen
Yes ,You people are mushrik also this person.😂😂😂
May Allah preserve Shaykh Asrar and allow us to benefit from him...
This makes everything as clear as crystal - Subhanallah 💚
Allah bless you Shaykh Asrar Rashid حفظه الله تعالى ❤❤❤
Mashallah may allah keep us stead fast upon ahlussunah
SubhanAllah well done guys May Allah grant expansions in your knowledge & JazakAllah for clarifying our aqida Alhamdulillah
Shaykh you're amazing! May Allah reward you abundantly ❤️
Ya Shaik I wish I could Learn Islam With You.. Iam taking Halaqat with the HT and Also with other shuke But it is not A lot Want to Seriously learn Islam, Masha Allah And Jazakallahu khairan.. For your videos...
Shaykh Asrar Rashid Sahab great personality
Very nice Dr Asrar Rashid
Mashallah great post very interesting
Shyakh asrar is a great scholar in the world
Deoband stance on Abdul Wahhaab is clear by the way.
Mawlānā Rashīd Ahmad Gangohī writes, “People call Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb ‘Wahhābi’. He was a good person, and I have heard (sunā hey) that he follows the Hanbali School of thought and acts upon the Hadith. He used to prevent people from Shirk and innovation, but he was harsh in his attitude.”[12]
He also writes, “The followers of Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb are known as Wahhabis. They had good beliefs and their school of thought was Hanbali. They were very stringent in their attitude but he and his followers were good people. Yes, those who exceeded the limits were overcome by wretchedness. The belief of all is the same, and the difference they have in actions is like that of the Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki and Hanbali schools of thought.”[13]
Muftī Mahmūd al-Hasan Gangohī states in his Fatāwā that, Mawlānā Rashīd Ahmad Gangohī was initially unaware of Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb’s ideology, because he was initially known in the Subcontinent as a reformer of Sunnah, and one who strived greatly in rejecting Bid‘ah and establishing the Sunnah. As such, Mawlānā Rashīd Ahmad also said that his opinion was based on what he had heard, for a Muslim should always hold good opinions about other Muslims until it is proven otherwise. Thereafter, Mawlānā Rashid Ahmad’s teacher sent him the copy of Radd al-Muhtar wherein ‘Allāma ibn ‘Abidīn clearly refuted Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb. ‘Allāma ibn Abidīn states,
“…as it has occurred in our times with the followers of (Muhammad b.) Abdul Wahhāb, who appeared from Najd and imposed their control over the two sacred Harams. They used to attribute themselves to the Hanbalī School but they believed that only they were Muslims and that whoever opposed their beliefs were polytheists. Thus they considered the killing of those who were from the Ahlus Sunnah and their scholars to be legitimate, until Allah Most High destroyed their might and power.” [14]
Mufti Mahmūd al-Hasan states that had Mawlāna Rashīd Ahmad Gangohī read what ‘Allāmah Ibn ‘Abidīn stated in his Radd al-Muhtār regarding Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb and his movement, he would surely not have stated what he had in his Fatāwā.
Moreover, the students of Mawlānā Rashīd Ahmad Gangohī clearly refuted the ideologies and actions of Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb and his movement. As will be mentioned, Mawlānā Khalil Ahmad Sahāranpūrī, a student of the Mawlānā Rashīd Ahmad Gangohī, stated in his book al-Muhannad ala al-Mufannad that he and his teachers hold the same view as ‘Allāmah ibn ‘Abidīn regarding Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb and his followers. This was agreed upon and signed by almost all of the major scholars of the Indian subcontinent, including Shaykh al-Hind Mawlānā Mahmūd Hasan Deobandī, Mawlānā ‘Azīzur Rahmān, Hakīmul Ummah Mawlānā Ashraf ‘Ali Thānawī, Mawlānā Habībur Rahmān Deobandī and many others.
Mawlāna Khaīl Amad Sahāranpūrī sates:
“Their (Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab and his adherents) ruling according to us is what the author of al-Durr al-Mukhtār said: ‘The Khawārij are a violent group that rebelled against ‘Ali due to an interpretation by which they believed that he was on falsehood and disbelief or disobedience making fighting him obligatory according to their interpretation. They legitimise our blood and our properties and take our women captives,’ until he said, ‘Their ruling is the ruling of rebels,’ and then he said, ‘We do not classify them as disbelievers because their actions are based on an interpretation although false.’ Al-Shāmī said in his commentary, ‘As has occurred in our time by the followers of ‘Abd al-Wahhab who came out from Najd and dominated the two Harams. He would claim to belong to the Madhhab of the Hanbalis but they believed that they are the only Muslims and those who disagreed with their belief are polytheists, and due to this, they legitimised the killing of the Ahlus Sunnah and ‘Ulamā until Allah broke their supremacy.’
“Then I (Mawlana Khalīl) say: Neither he nor any of his followers are from our Mashāyikh (mentors) in a chain from the chains of knowledge of jurisprudence, Hadith, Fiqh and Tasawwuf.”[15]
Mawlāna Anwar Shāh Kashmīrī Kashmīrī writes, “As for Muhammad b. ‘Abdul Wahhāb Najdī, indeed he was a dull minded person with little knowledge. He would be hasty in passing a ruling of disbelief on others. It is not appropriate that any one traverses this valley (passing a judgement of disbelief) except if he is diligent and has mastered the scenarios of disbelief and its causes.”[16]
Mawlānā Hussayn Ahmad Madanī writes, “Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb appeared in Najd in the 13th century A.H. He harboured evil thoughts and held wrong beliefs, due to which he waged war on the Ahlus Sunnah Wa al-Jamā‘ah. He attempted to force his evil thoughts upon them and considered their properties as spoils of war and their killing as a source of blessing and mercy. He was harsh on the people of the Haramayn in particular and on the people of the Hijāz in general. He spoke ill of the pious people of the early generations. Because of the atrocities committed by him, countless people had to flee the holy cities of Makkah and Madīnah, and many of them were martyred by his troops. In short, he was a tyrant, rebel and blood spilling transgressor.”[17]
However, it is claimed that Mawlānā Husayn Ahmad Madanī retracted from his original view. This is based on a supposed statement made by Mawlānā Husain Ahmad Madanī produced in a newspaper named Zameendār in the year 1925/1343. [18]However, after comparing the date of his supposed retraction and other statements, it becomes evident that his final and only opinion was that mentioned in al-Shihāb al-Thāqib (the above mentioned quotation). Mawlānā Husayn Ahmad Madanī was asked if he had changed his opinion regarding Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb, and he replied,
“Al-Shihāb al-Thāqib was my first book written as a refutation on Ahmad Raza Khān. I only mentioned the Wahhābi sect by the way in order to show that our predecessors had a very moderate approach.”
He further writes,
“I still hold on to the opinion expressed in this book and this is the opinion of my predecessors.”
This statement was dated at 1950/1370 which is much later than his supposed retraction. Therefore, it is clear that Mawlānā Husayn Ahmad Madanī is also of the view that Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb and his followers were not of sound ideology.[19]
Mawlāna Manzūr Nu‘mānī was of the opinion that Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb and his adherents were upon the truth and the allegations levelled against them were baseless. He writes, “After studying his life, I have realised that Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb encountered the same challenges that Shaykh Ismaīl Shahīd faced i.e. false accusations…His call to the oneness of Allah and efforts of reformation comprised of Jihād with the sword…”[20]
Mawlānā Ahmad Bijnorī writes after proving that there are many differences between the Salafīs and the scholars of Deoband, “The respected scholar Manzūr Nu‘mānī feels that the differences between the Salafī movement and the scholars of Deoband are only in a few issues. He also claims that Shaykh al-Islām Mawlānā Husain Ahmad Madanī had retracted from his original view regarding Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb whereas in reality he only lessened his harshness against him.” [21]
Muftī Mahmūd Gangohī
Muftī Mahmūd writes, “Muhammad b. Abdul Wahhāb al-Najdī was a follower of the Sunnah but was extreme in his beliefs, statements and actions. He was a person of very little knowledge and understanding…..”[22]
He also writes, “He claimed to follow the Sunnah hence, many people joined him. However, many of his views were contrary to the Sunnah…as his true colours began to show, many people left his group. It became apparent that his objective was to seize political power and his claim to follow the Sunnah was merely to attract a following.” [23]
Conclusion
The above quoted views of the senior ‘Ulamā of Deoband about Shaikh Muhammad b. ‘Abdul Wahhāb are clear. A mufti or sheik will only give a fatwa based on the knowledge and information which are presented to him.
Mashallah I thought you would not write maualam nomanis view but you mentioned it.
Can you give me your tahkeek on istegatha
Mashallah very detailed jazkallah khayr
aaj mai na kisi aleem e deen ko suna wo galiban daeo band tha ya salfi tou mera ilam bohot kam tou meri dil fitnay ka shikar hwa aur ajeeb say wisawis any lagy.. halat meri asi thi ki mujy ronay ka dil kar raha tha.. magr Allah shaikh asrar rashid kay ilam amal mai barktain ata karay enko sunnay k bad dil ko taskeen hwi... aur mujy ala hazrat ya wo mashoor shair yad aa raha hai....
ahl e sunnat ka hai bairdaa paar..
ashab e huzur najm hain aur noh hai itrat rasool Allah kip❤️
It'd be a massive help if you can break down the entire talk, by themes and minutes, in the description.
Its a very long and beneficial discussion. Make it easier for people to follow.
is it coming from Roronoa ZorOoOo!!!!
Nice work sheikh,I am deobandi and where your school and our school gets distracted is when we blindly defend our shuyukh . .both schools have got weak aspects and combining both the schools will make an excellent hanafi school . .may Allah bring us to the ideal fiqh as of Shaykh Ahmed Sirhindi RA,Ameen!
read the maktob 220 of sheikh Ahmed Sirhindi !!
@@badarmalik5887 thanks,read it again 🌹
Shaykh was truely a millenial mujaddid,may Allah raise his positions in jannatul firdaus! Ameen
Mashallah very detailed
Jazakallahu khayr
Narrated Ibn `Umar:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Sham! O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Yemen." The People said, "And also on our Najd." He said, "O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Sham (north)! O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Yemen." The people said, "O Allah's Apostle! And also on our Najd." I think the third time the Prophet (ﷺ) said, "There (in Najd) is the place of earthquakes and afflictions and from there comes out the side of the head of Satan."
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab was a religious leader and theologian from Najd in central arabia who founded the movement now called wahhabism
Haq is with Ahle Sunnah..Shaikh Ashrar Zindabad
Mashallah good debate, i looked on haleems video on you tube they are trying to humialiate you,sly fox tactics, keep spreading the good work you doing
MashAllah. Love Shaykh Asrar
Please split this in parts. Makes it easier to grasp and learn.
ruclips.net/video/U79a-7kRWJY/видео.html
This is related
MashAllah. Beautifully explained. Brothes and sisters, its important to research your deen. The more yoi study thw better your knowledge will be. May Allah Almighty guide us all to follow the correct way. Ameen
Thank u brother asrar .... u made it clear .... thankss
Subhanallah Sheikh Mashaallah
Most engaging although this raises a question - How many people have actually listened to this 4 hour marathon???
I did and I found it beneficial.
Me and it was the best
i did nd it's beneficial
The best thing about the barelvi is that if there goes anyone out of the way or have some unorthodox aqeeda the other aalims of the same group oppose him hardly , which isn't found in case of deobandis .
Yes brother ahle sunnat wal jamaat zindabad
Yes because whoever deviates from the way of momineen, He is opposed obviously because Truth is already clear and established with proofs
That's why the barelvi guys are shy to call them selves barelvi.
They call themselves Ahle Sunnat to mislead the ignorant masses.
You know why ?
They're hiding from the shirk teachings and aqaaid of their leaders.
@@kingbrorajabhai6913 you mean ahke bidat?
@@aneeskemal4431 yh the deobandi sect are ahle bidah
Loved it ❤
jazakAllah brother asrar
Sheikh sahib went on overtime today.
SubhanAllah
So nice of you to upload this on youtube🌷🌹
Ma sha allah sheikh
Great video. I can see this a series or weekly podcast
Lets talk about how to better our people today.
MashAllah great insight from Moulana Sahib on the topic.
نور نبی ص سے سب کچھ ہے۔ وہ شاہد ہیں۔ النَّبِيُّ أَوْلَى بِالْمُؤْمِنِينَ مِنْ أَنفُسِهِمْ
Mashallah asr legend ❤️
Excellent source of knowledge. I'm 1.5 hours in so far.
The wahabis removed something from the English translation?? Isn't that deception?
Clear and precise
Subhanallah marshaallah
Mashallah
May Allah reward him nowadays a lot of people have fallen for the deobandi lies
If we teach Aqeedah and texts in both Barelwi and Deobandi that are pre Deobandi/barelwi .. sticking to the known Asha’ri/Maturidi Mutoon we can erase this issue within a generation .
I don't think that this issue will going to end because there are the blind follower of deoband who are going to hell one by one
How to contact Shaikh sahab please guide
Allah apko salamat rakhe
Thanks for exposing the deobandis and extremist brelvis !! Proud to be Sunni
Sheikh Asrar's sound is missing..plz reupload with correction
Alhamdulillah! First 😇
Who is the student that is refered to?
Can you please pass my message over to Shaykh Asrar. It would be better to hold a series of lectures on each major point of ths Sunni Aqeeda in which we have differences with the non-Sunnis.
Please put timestamps
Greetings from India
Allah guide asrar to the true deem amen
He is saying right that deobandi and barelvi both are following blindly their akabir.
The guy in the white hat keeps talking about certain texts without giving any references. If he quotes then needs to provide proper reference. Or else he possibly is the one doing the trickery and deception
Assalamualaykum sheikh please speak about the political situation at the time of the establishment of the darul uloom deoband. Speak about how the British and Indian governments encouraged the deoband movement to split the Muslim ummah.make clear that the whole split was done by the zionist as the Indian Muslims were very loyal to our last Uthmania Khalifa.
As Salamu Alaykum
Any way to correspond with shaykh it his students? I’d like clarification on some matters discussed
JazakAllah
Given that Nabeel Afzal is a Khalifah of Irfan Shah... and Sh. Asrar is a friend of Nabeel... their relationship must be awkward... that’s why I like Sh. Asrar- keeps it real
AsSalamu Alaikum VarahmatuLlahi Vabarakatuhu. From Moscow.
What is the name of the kitab written by Mulla Ali Qari?
1:12:00 Al-jism-Al-mithāli
Masallah
Good debate
Let's have a pre-debate of the debate...before we debate
Dude that Usman guy thinks Asrar has tricks up his sleeves so he is so defensive... I don’t think he is capable of having debates as his hatred for Asrar is too much
No one says doing mawlid is shirk, rather it's a biddah, however the things people do and exclaim in the name of mawlid falls into shirk , like calling the deceased for help or intercession
Unless someone specifically assumes him equal to Allah that's when it becomes shirk otherwise it is teachings of Allah's friends like Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilani Radiallahu anhu quotes the Surah Nisa ayat 64 where Allah says "And We did not send any messenger except to be obeyed by permission of Allāh. And if, when they wronged themselves, they had come to you, [O Muḥammad], and asked forgiveness of Allāh and the Messenger had asked forgiveness for them, they would have found Allāh Accepting of Repentance and Merciful."
Here Allah himself says to his slaves when he commits mistake, go to Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Alaihi Wa Sallam and ask him to pray Allah to forgive us, and surely Allah will accept your repentance and he is merciful.
This ayat itself speaks about asking from Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Alaihi Wa Sallam, by the way it is not limited to particular era, if it was then it would have been an unjustice with us as we don't have the luxury to ask him to pray on our behalf.
So many people have started learning Qur'an to satisf their nafs, that's the reason we are constantly out under punishment, let's understand Qur'an from pious people and followAllah and Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Alaihi Wa Sallam's instructions to succeed in our life. Hope this answers your doubt. Jazakallah khair.
Salam Alaikum , just wanted to say thank you for these videos,in the future can timestamps also be applied for certain topics? It would be greatly appreciated 😊
ruclips.net/video/U79a-7kRWJY/видео.html
This is related
2:35 even nowadays we can see the copy of a single human being in the whole world in tv or RUclips.
Sheikh should use his obvious intellect for hikmat of dean and not further confusion of the ummat with pointless debates that most of the laymen masses dnt even have the capacity to understand...these kinds of open aired debates and refutations do more damage to the ummat then benefit...ulamaa should have respectfull debates behind closed doors , and avoid cult like following and sectarianisms....this is damaging.may Allah guide and protect us all
Debates have always happened in the history of Islamic Scholarship, that too in public. Because in Islam, unlike other religions there is no discrimination between a scholar and a layman muslim in the matters of deen. Yes, there is a natural difference between the knowledge, piety and nature of a scholar in comparison to a layman.
And since that's the case in Islam, knowledge is WAAJIB on every muslim, obligatory! And these debates even though they promote sectarianism(which is a natural byproduct of speaking for the haqq) are useful and beneficial for the ummah. Debates promote curiosity and curiosity promotes knowledge. So, in conclusion since our Deen doesn't discriminate between a layman and a scholar in matters of deen, it's necessary for everything to be out in the open which includes debates between the various sects on various issues as well as the debates result in the increase of knowledge of the layman and a chance for him to see the how the actual Islamic scholarship works!
Very informative
Shaykh sahib zindabad
Who are these bury graduates? Any links to their videos?
Allislamproductions
Once I was in Pakistan, wearing a white thobe, white shawl and white turban, and went to a Barelawi mosque for Jumua'h. When they did qiyam for reading "Salat and Salam", I remained seated.
How can abu jahal and follower of yazeed is going to salaam my life prophet mohammad salllallahu alaiyhi wassalam is this is not your fault this is the fault of your mother that he birth from pig..
Do you want a medal?
And qiyaam for salaat o salaam isn’t limited to “brelvi” its a sunni tradition
You must be against Shaikh of Deobandi movement's founder Haji Imdadullah Muhajir Makki, who used to celebrate Mawlid and approved salat o salam and qiyam for it.
@@MrMkn1991 I am not against the practice. Haji Imdadullah rahmatullah alaih was a great saint, but we take masail from Ulama of Deoband.
@@AbdulKhader-786 so Ulema of Deoband refer to Mawlid as biddah does it also apply to Haji Imdadullah Muhajir Makki (r.a) or it only applies to other Sunnis?
The brother to the right by asking questions of viewers in between is disturbing the conversation. He intercepted and interrupted too many times.
Better video quality would be appreciated 😀
Asrar Rashid should be using the references from Quran and hadith etc to justify the claims from malfoozat, All his doing is justifying from other books written by authors of brelwi and deobandi scholars, Asrar Rashid knows he cannot justify from any authentic sources the claims and stories which Ahmed rezas claims , all he does is justify with similar controversial texts this is not scholarship but rather just justification with anything
No he shouldn’t your ‘argument’ is nonsensical, Malfuzat wasn’t even written by Ahma Rida Khan whereas the Deobandiyah’s books were written by their authors. Do you affirm the statements they made?
@conjugatemethod , So who wrote malfoozat, was it Ahmed rezas son ? Also regarding deobandi or any other scholars books , if it agrees with Quran and sunnah and with the pious predecessors than only we accept it , otherwise we reject it , There is no one above Quran and sunnah
@@choma9007 first of all, one cannot judge someone from his malfuzaat, it is a principle. secondly, dawate islami has published malfuzat with all the references written down. so consider reading it before making any perception
Is the brother in the middle a descendant of Saeed Asad?
1:02
"I believe this term deobandi or Barelwi,should not be utilized by people, they should refer to themselves as Sunni Muslims"
Do you believe that Deobandis are Sunni and part of Ahl Sunnat Wal Jamaat?
Deobandis are Muqallid Wahabis and AHL e hadith are ghyr Muqallid Wahabis .....
Sound is very low.
Blind leading the blind allaah help us.
Deobandi aqeeda is the curse and azaab from Allah for Muslim ummah May Allah forgive us and end the deobandism aameen
@@kingbrorajabhai6913 There is no azab for muslims
As-salamu alaykum, shiekh I live locally and want to become your student, how can I do this?
Go to the mosque he works at
Nice
What is the Hukm of Isthighasa?
It's permeable near AHLA sunnat wal jamat
Please upload Eng sub title for urdu clips
Assalamu alaikum huzoor Allama Shaikh Asrar Rasheed Hafizahul'lah
An interesting video.
On the topic of hadhir and nadhir I noticed a discrepancy.
When Shaykh Asrar mentioned some Deobandis saying Allah is hadhir and nadhir, this is incorrect because it implies Allah is physically present everywhere whereas Allah is not confined to space. The point is made that it cannot be said hadhir and nadhir is an attribute of Allah. Fair enough.
Now when it comes to Barelvis using the term hadhir and nadhir for Rasulullah salallahu alayhi wasalam, shaykh gives it a figurative meaning, saying it refers to the angels presenting our deeds to the Nabi as referred to in hadith.
Why is it that for Deobandis we have to use the literal meaning. And for Barelvis they are given the liberty to have meant a figurative meaning?
I think the whole contention with this is that the term hadhir and nadhir is not from the Quran and Sunnah. As such it should just be abandoned and stick to the words of the Quran and Sunnah.
Shaykh says he is objective and not biased to any group, if that's the case then why insist on using the term hadhir nadhir just because some previous scholars used it. Its become a point of identity for the Barelvi group.
On topic of imkan al-kizb.
The Deobandis can quote fatawa of their founders where they have said whoever believes that Allah speaks a lie is a clear kaafir.
To me it looks like the whole discussion around this topic is an unnecessary theoretical debate that scholars on both sides dwelled into to flex their philosophical muscles.
Both camps agree on the conclusion that Allah will never lie. The debate and confrontation is around what philosophical reasoning do they use to get to that conclusion.
Some Deobandis opined that Allah has the Power to do whatever He wants, but He will not go against what He has said and ordered out of His Divine Will. Conclusion is the same: Allah will never lie.
Shaykh Asrar and the Barelvis opine that Allah intrinsically cannot lie. Conclusion is the same: Allah will never lie.
Again to me it looks like an unnecessary philosophical discussion that should be abandoned in favour of the clear and straight forward words from Quran and Sunnah.
Khuram Hussain - as to your objection regarding the hadhir nadhir issue then the problem is what follows this terminology. If you are claiming that its an unnecessarily convoluted topic which could be avoided by avoiding using the terminology then theoretically thats fine, however, due to the fact that it is used our issue is when people label the brelvis/sunnis as kuffaar for using these terms for the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم. The matter requires clarification due to this problem.
As for the imkan kizb issue then yes both sides agree that Allah WILL never lie but that doesn't mean that Allah CANNOT lie.
You refer to it as flexing philosophical muscles however the problems which arise from the first statement are too dangerous to ignore.
Consider this. Someone asks you that if you claim Allah will never lie, but He can then how do you know the Quran is truthful? You will respond with, "Allah says so in the Quran." Their simple response which you will never be able to counter will be, "how do you know thats not a lie?"
I think the qaida is that if the conclusion of something leads to an impossibility then what's lazim to it will also be impossible. (Been a while since I looked at the subject akhi.) Hope that helps somewhat akhi.
@@khuramhussain7162 There is a Major Diffrence:
Deobandis Ascribed Attribute of Naqs (Falsehood) to ALLAH SUBHANUHU WA TAÀLA.
While Ahlus Sunnah believe That ALLAH ﷻ IS FREE FROM any Attribute of Naqs (Aieb - like Falsehood, Being Cruel or Dishonest etc.). Any attributes of aeib is Muhaal for ALLAH ﷻ.
As Quran Clearly Stated: سُبْحَٰنَ رَبِّكَ رَبِّ ٱلْعِزَّةِ عَمَّا يَصِفُونَ
Purity is to your Lord, the Lord of Honour, from all what they say.
37-As-Saaffat : 180
Shaykh Asrar I am a fan of you..
But plz plz leave these types of sectarian debates even if someone ask you to jump in.
Other people they laugh at us after watching these type of lectures.
Jzk
Brother this is very important to correct the aqeeda of the Muslims
Shud i stop going to deoband mosque???i used to listen to fazail amal which helped me greatly ...wat is your advise sheick ...my intention is learning aqeedah at tahawiya soon from an ustadh who have an ijazah in aqeeda ,fiqh and tazkiyyah...he studied in morroco qarramayn (something like that) university..he live in another city and is neither deobandi or barelwi by the look of it....i want to know if i can learn at tahawiyah from a mufti in my mosque which i go ,which is a deobandi mosque...please reply i am very stress and confused...the stuff of whether Allah can lie but choose not ...i reject it ..in fact i never learned this in the mosque ...i only learned it through ur video...i am not an expert to understand those mental gymnastics things...but if u say its wrong then i accept and reject it...btw u doing great work bridging the gap between the deobandi and barelwi muslims...in all this i blame the ulema of both these group...there are extreme barelwi who keep labeling people as gustakhi ect...i notice some of them on youtube comment seem to have a cult mentality...btw i refuse to label myself barelwi or deobandi ...
Yes brother stop going to deoband masjid because whose imam believe is not that which Islam taught then how can his nawaaz is going to be accepted..
Brother, please inform Shaykh Asrar to only have Ulema discussing these issues of Aqeeda with him. May Allah bless the brother wearing Shalwar Qameez for helping in defending the Aqaid of the Ahlus Sunnah, however, it opens up opportunities for the Non-Sunnis to attack us due to the mistakes he makes as he must not be an Alim. He can help behind the scenes if he has good research on these topics, but in front of the camera is very damaging to us.
What did he say that offended you so much ? And you do realise we are in a lockdown....
Thank you
5:06 Hadith of Buzzaar