Better to compare these to a motorcycle. Absolutely zero crash protection, no air bags, body is fibreglass, no convertible top, no side windows, zero luggage space, no way to lock it. You would basically have to take it out of your garage, go for a spin, and take it back home. That’s fine, but now 40K seems high for it’s functionality. P.s. Why would you put A/C in a car you can’t enclose?
Dont be too quick to judge. Though the swingaxle cars did indeed have jacking (hence roll center increase) issues, they were and remain remarkably agile - particularly when fitted with a 'camber compensator'. Furthermore, if desired the late 69 < IRS chassis were not plagued by the swingaxles inherent dynamics and were architecturally similar to the later Porsche 911 platform. Whichever the choice, were talking about low mass here and unless one is seriously exersizing the cars, the lateral skid pad acceleration (G-Load) values are far beyond what any sane person would see on the road in a daily use environment.
The first car with the blue top is in my collection. Purchased from Wayne Carini at F40 Motorsports. Very nice car, fun to drive!
Love those bonnet straps and make it period. The wheels are so nice, carpets authentic but the luggage rack is a no never !
My dream cars!!!!
Beetle style handbrake and pedals. I think only SAS does it differently
Wow! What does one of these beauties go for?
My father paid 40 I believe in 2020
@@brkbtjunkie … that is very doable. I think I am going to look into one for myself!
Can you put the ignition on the left side of the steering wheel?
my dream car
How much are these
can you get one with an automatic because I have had 4 left knee surgeries and can't be pushing down a clutch all day
Gorgeous!🥂
what kinds of engine? how much?
Who do I call to get more info and tuning of build?
Крутые тачки! 👍
Start at 40k
Are you _kidding_ me? That's like the cost of a low-mid range, domestically produced family sedan.
I'm getting one!
@@JulianVince 2 plus year wait.
Better to compare these to a motorcycle. Absolutely zero crash protection, no air bags, body is fibreglass, no convertible top, no side windows, zero luggage space, no way to lock it. You would basically have to take it out of your garage, go for a spin, and take it back home. That’s fine, but now 40K seems high for it’s functionality.
P.s. Why would you put A/C in a car you can’t enclose?
@@rozinant1237 Why a Joint Strike Fighter? for more than 100.000.000 dollar? For peace? Youre kidding me.
@@Freba66 what?
can you put a ls small block v8?
Mine won't need tailpipes, because it's an EV!
Is anyone building these as EVs?
So many better handling chassis’s to put these bodies on. What a shame
Dont be too quick to judge. Though the swingaxle cars did indeed have jacking (hence roll center increase) issues, they were and remain remarkably agile - particularly when fitted with a 'camber compensator'. Furthermore, if desired the late 69 < IRS chassis were not plagued by the swingaxles inherent dynamics and were architecturally similar to the later Porsche 911 platform. Whichever the choice, were talking about low mass here and unless one is seriously exersizing the cars, the lateral skid pad acceleration (G-Load) values are far beyond what any sane person would see on the road in a daily use environment.
Take those ‘modesty belts ‘ off, they are meant for the boot