I know you probably don't get a lot of Grizzlies fans on your site but can youj possibly explain to me why the Grizzlies would draft a 6' 4" tweener guard who can't hit the three?
Really like his POA Defense and I thought he was the best on the board still early in the draft process but even if it is just a bit repetitive I would still take the risk just cus that that pick I thought he was the best in the board
I'm glad everyone is down with Demin. He's another high pick that is getting a bad rap, kind of like Micheal Porter. The Spurs will gladly scoop him up at 12 or 13th pick. Thank you very much for following everybody's else top 20. I only wish the draft will go like this. He's going to be the steal of the draft.
@@Atthebuzzersports I just saw him buzzsaw OKC State into BBQ chicken. He's only 18 yrs old at 6'9" PURE POINT guard. That's 3 inches away from being 7'0" tall. But he plays with a high BBIQ. He's a floor general. He's not out to score in bunches. He's the director. He's extremely good at it and will only get better.
There are tiers of #1 overall prospects. I'd throw AD in that 'generational' category with LeBron and Wemby bc of how high each of their floors already were, combined with how high their perceived ceilings were/are, folding in physical traits that you just can't find anywhere. Zion might've merited conversation in that top tier just for his combination of size and athleticism, but he hasn't stayed off the twinkies enough to really matter. Luka might've also been in this top tier convo based on his sheer IQ at a young age if the Suns had actually done their homework and taken him #1 overall. There's another tier a notch below, with guys like Cade, Ant, Paolo Banchero, Kyrie, Tim Duncan, Shaq, Yao Ming, etc.. - dudes who might not quite be considered 'generational' as prospects regardless of how good they became later in their careers; but they are either completely fundamentally sound with nearly zero perceived flaws, or they have one single standout trait that stands head and shoulder above the rest of the class: Kyrie and Ant's scoring, Yao and Shaq's size, and Cade/Duncan/Paolo's all-round fundamentals + highest floor. Then theres the tier of guys who make you cry at night and wonder of why lottery gods why the fuck of all of the years why in this shitty fucking mid-AF year did I have to win the lottery: Kwame Brown, Andrea Bargnani, Anthony Bennett, Zachary Risacher.
@@alonzopierce4718 I'm talking about how they were viewed as prospects, not what they eventually became once their careers ended. You could throw both Shaq and Timmy in that top tier and I'd have no argument against that. Between the two of them, I'd lean towards putting Duncan in over Shaq. At the time when Shaq came into the league, there was already a prototype (Bill Russell, Wilt, Hakeem, David Robinson, Ewing, etc..) for what he might one day become. Obviously Shaq rose to as great or even greater heights than some of those guys, but he didn't come in with any size or skillset hitherto never before seen in the league by a center; he supplemented physical traits that the league already had seen with a ferocity that was new. Frankly same for Timmy D; he wasn't the tallest/fastest/most skilled at any one thing, but he was so good at everything. Tim's overall skillset was already so refined when he arrived, causing him to have a higher floor than most players' ceilings. I considered TimmyD the archetype for AD, except AD was more athletic, with still room to fill out his frame, oh and AD hadn't even scratched the surface for his offensive skillset while coming into the league as an all-defense 1st teamer from day one. The perceived ceiling on AD back in 2012 was why I put him in that top tier, not necessarily what he's accomplished thus far in his career
@@Vorcze Yea "The next". LeBron was compared to Scottie and Grant Hill but LeBron as an 18 yr old was something we'd never seen before. Wemby is something we've never seen before. Shaq was not the league-changing prospect that these other two guys were. Shaq was not as tall as Kareem or Wilt. He had a prototype for his height and build in Pat Ewing and David Robinson. There was already a model for post-game skill set in Hakeem. Shaq went on to be more dominant than any of these guys but when he came in AS A PROSPECT he was fairly lean compared to what he was at the height of his powers with the Lakers. Shaq evolved to be THAT big man during his career, but he wasn't already that guy coming out of college
I will cry tears if joy if Raptors actually get the 1st pick in the lottery
How do you not have more subs?? This was a great video and great breakdown!
We will get there man I’m glad you believe in me the way you do!!!!! I always appreciate the love and support ❤️
Earned a new sub
Thank you man❤️ it’s always appreciated
Thank you for actually picking a shooter for the spurs.
Have you looked at Hansen yangs game at all? I’m extremely high on him but I would like to know your thoughts
tre johnson WILL be better than VJ.
I know you probably don't get a lot of Grizzlies fans on your site but can youj possibly explain to me why the Grizzlies would draft a 6' 4" tweener guard who can't hit the three?
Really like his POA Defense and I thought he was the best on the board still early in the draft process but even if it is just a bit repetitive I would still take the risk just cus that that pick I thought he was the best in the board
I'm glad everyone is down with Demin. He's another high pick that is getting a bad rap, kind of like Micheal Porter. The Spurs will gladly scoop him up at 12 or 13th pick. Thank you very much for following everybody's else top 20. I only wish the draft will go like this. He's going to be the steal of the draft.
Have you not watched his past games?
@@Atthebuzzersports I just saw him buzzsaw OKC State into BBQ chicken. He's only 18 yrs old at 6'9" PURE POINT guard. That's 3 inches away from being 7'0" tall. But he plays with a high BBIQ. He's a floor general. He's not out to score in bunches. He's the director. He's extremely good at it and will only get better.
There are tiers of #1 overall prospects. I'd throw AD in that 'generational' category with LeBron and Wemby bc of how high each of their floors already were, combined with how high their perceived ceilings were/are, folding in physical traits that you just can't find anywhere. Zion might've merited conversation in that top tier just for his combination of size and athleticism, but he hasn't stayed off the twinkies enough to really matter. Luka might've also been in this top tier convo based on his sheer IQ at a young age if the Suns had actually done their homework and taken him #1 overall. There's another tier a notch below, with guys like Cade, Ant, Paolo Banchero, Kyrie, Tim Duncan, Shaq, Yao Ming, etc.. - dudes who might not quite be considered 'generational' as prospects regardless of how good they became later in their careers; but they are either completely fundamentally sound with nearly zero perceived flaws, or they have one single standout trait that stands head and shoulder above the rest of the class: Kyrie and Ant's scoring, Yao and Shaq's size, and Cade/Duncan/Paolo's all-round fundamentals + highest floor. Then theres the tier of guys who make you cry at night and wonder of why lottery gods why the fuck of all of the years why in this shitty fucking mid-AF year did I have to win the lottery: Kwame Brown, Andrea Bargnani, Anthony Bennett, Zachary Risacher.
How the hell you put AD in tier 1, but not Timmy D & Shaq? AD had far more questions marks coming out than the two of them combined.
@@alonzopierce4718 I'm talking about how they were viewed as prospects, not what they eventually became once their careers ended. You could throw both Shaq and Timmy in that top tier and I'd have no argument against that. Between the two of them, I'd lean towards putting Duncan in over Shaq. At the time when Shaq came into the league, there was already a prototype (Bill Russell, Wilt, Hakeem, David Robinson, Ewing, etc..) for what he might one day become. Obviously Shaq rose to as great or even greater heights than some of those guys, but he didn't come in with any size or skillset hitherto never before seen in the league by a center; he supplemented physical traits that the league already had seen with a ferocity that was new. Frankly same for Timmy D; he wasn't the tallest/fastest/most skilled at any one thing, but he was so good at everything. Tim's overall skillset was already so refined when he arrived, causing him to have a higher floor than most players' ceilings. I considered TimmyD the archetype for AD, except AD was more athletic, with still room to fill out his frame, oh and AD hadn't even scratched the surface for his offensive skillset while coming into the league as an all-defense 1st teamer from day one. The perceived ceiling on AD back in 2012 was why I put him in that top tier, not necessarily what he's accomplished thus far in his career
@@shashanksubramaniam1400 shaq was literally the next big man 💀💀
@@Vorcze Yea "The next". LeBron was compared to Scottie and Grant Hill but LeBron as an 18 yr old was something we'd never seen before. Wemby is something we've never seen before. Shaq was not the league-changing prospect that these other two guys were. Shaq was not as tall as Kareem or Wilt. He had a prototype for his height and build in Pat Ewing and David Robinson. There was already a model for post-game skill set in Hakeem. Shaq went on to be more dominant than any of these guys but when he came in AS A PROSPECT he was fairly lean compared to what he was at the height of his powers with the Lakers. Shaq evolved to be THAT big man during his career, but he wasn't already that guy coming out of college
@@shashanksubramaniam1400 u just spew out paragraphs to hide your shit opinions omfg