He’s an idiot. He can barely do joined up talking. This is a person who went on national tv and called the funeral of the queen “The most important event the world will ever see”. What an arse.
So the English are voting because Britain is an islamic black & Indian state right? I see why you don't vote for a ceasefire in Ukraine because it's a white country
There will never be change unless both Labour and Conservative are beaten by a new party who puts the needs of the British people first . We are on a loop which is getting worse by the day , the problems of homelessness, jobs , gang violence and drugs on our streets coupled with high prices and low wages has damaged this country no end . We have bailed out banks to the sum of billions while they carry on like nothing has happed , no body takes the blame and we suffer yet again , the education system is falling apart along with our health services. All it’s been is either Conservative or Labour who gave run this country post war and yet we are returning to the pre war days of no health services, and no pensions because both are corrupt to the core and unless we the public say enough is enough the loop will continue. As for Israel and Palestine that conflict will go not till the end d of time because nether can see the wood before the trees and the killing will never end , the madness in the Houses of Parliament means nothing to the people suffering both at home or abroad because all of these politicians live in a fantasy world and not in the real world …….
There is nothing more beautiful to behold than an SNP’s Righteousness Rage I will miss the SNP when Scotland finally gets their much deserved Independence
@@mrD66Mbut that wasn’t ‘the parliament’, that was actions of an individual. I think everyone is questioning the integrity of the speaker this time and the labour opposition. Which in most estimates is way worse.
I remember a time, way back in childhood. And the innocence of youth. That I assumed that the most intelligent and efficient people only, rose up to the heights of leading a whole country. I believed that they acted within the best interests of the country and it's citizens. As an adult, I have learnt that was as much an illusion as santa Clause! And still, we are fed lies and kept from seeing the true bigger picture, thanks to our media! The truth is that we are in deep trouble and as this is an election year, I won't try to persuade anyone who to vote for, just ask PLEASE, take a close look at our options - none of which is to not vote, or spoil your paper, because apathy is a vote for more of the same! This is the election that our grandchildren will be asking how did we vote.
@thesubinejelly8764 he made one mistake in good faith and apologised what did labour do, was it anything worse than what Govt has done time and time again?
@@mrD66M you can take his word for it if you want but making a ‘mistake’ in a very serious situation like this still calls into question his credibility. Labour was reported by very senior and credible journalist that they were lobbying the speaker before the vote in the corridors with multiple whiteness testimonies by other MPs. Labour are the party who aren’t transparent in their view of the matter because they’re scared of more division.
Fundamentally it's down to the idea that people couldn't vote for the SNP motion or the Conservative's amendment and so they would have to abstain on a vote on the Gaza ceasefire. It's a mess but that's really it
@@professorpigeon6517 - But it essentially meant the SNP's motion wasn't voted on... He instead put the Labour vote 1st, when it isn't their opposition day and I'm sorry but we know why that happened. He had a chat with Starmer who was worried that half his party would side with the SNP and make his party look divided Anyone trying to gloss over that fact and say "this is all normal procedure, stop moaning", is willfully ignorant
@@stefmanbrett91yes that’s how amendments work. To argue that amendments shouldn’t be voted on first, is to fundamentally miss the point of an amendment. Amendments…amend the motion. Opposition Day doesn’t mean get what you want, it means decide the business of the house and then the house decides if it likes the business you’ve brought
No lover of the SNP...but theyve got every right to be incandescent about this..Hoyle is guilty of shocking judgement at best, at worst downright partisanship...in other words corruption...and Starmers role in it all needs close scrutiny as well!!
Starmer acting as though he was King, perhaps he is, as we are all being told he WILL be the next PM, at a time when 2 senior royal family members have "very serious illnesses" at the same time, something that is highly unusual. This narrative of Starmer WILL DEFINITELY BE NEXT PM, despite the fact he has a WORSE RECORD OF VICTORIES AT THE POLLS THAN JEREMY CORBYN. has a deal been struck behind the scenes, resulting in the "overthrow" of the royal family by Starmer, who continues to act as though he was King.
The SNP walked out of the chamber, but the debate had already come to a close. They walked out during the Deputy Speakers speech outlining why their particular vote would not be heard. But according to one SNP MP they did still vote on the Labour amendment in the voting booths after walking out because they felt they had no choice. And that's exactly the point, because they weren't given a choice. Yesterday was one of 3 days out of the Parliament season where SNP get a chance to put forward their own motions for a vote, Labour get something like 18 of these days, SNP get 3. Normally other opposition parties cannot add amendments on these days, because they have their own days to put forward motions. Labour were in an uncomfortable position having ot either side with Government or support the SNP. And the speaker's decision to allow Labour motion effectively gave Labour a way out, otherwise Starmer may have faced massive rebellion because its not clear if he would have allowed his MPs to vote for SNP ceasefire and condemnation of Israel. The Speaker is normally re-elected after a General election so the theory is that Labour privately put pressure on him to allow their motion to go through on an SNP day, or he would lose his place after a massive Labour landslide election. So, yes its all very trivial and petty in the face of Gaza crisis, and it is really sad its come to this. But, it also raises questions of speaker impartiality and fair process in the House of Commons. Debate in our form doesn't work unless the speaker is neutral.
But also shouldn't they be given an option to vote on a ceasefire which doesn't use the language that the SNP's motion did and isn't the government's not ceasefire. Otherwise they would to have to abstain and that would be electorally toxic for Labour, you can see the leaflets now. It's a mess but I am with Hoyle on this one tbh. Equally it's shouldn't have to come down to an opposition day to have this debate.
Complete agree with this and I find it mind-boggling to all those who are trivialising this, saying "it's outdated, it doesn't matter". It does matter. It's about the impartiality of the speaker and how our democracy functions If this process was "so outdated" why not amend it earlier? Why choose the day when Labour face a full-scale rebellion to change the process which inevitably benefited Labour
@@cubbyhoo " Otherwise they would to have to abstain and that would be electorally toxic for Labour" that is not parliaments problem though, Labour make a political choice not to vote with the SNP on anything, They even have a name for it. The Bain principle. Why should Scotland's MPs being rode over to protect Labours Election chances?
The Speaker will never be "neutral" - it has to be an apolitical person for it to be neutral - good luck with that. Why would an apolitical person even want the job? lol
The SNP simply have to play this tape on loop when they're next campaigning for a referendum. I'm not Scottish but how anyone could argue for a Remain position after seeing that clown show, and the disrespect shown to the SNP, is completely beyond me.
The SNP don't deserve any respect. They are led by criminals and running Scotland into the ground. NHS in Scotland is an utter disgrace. The SNP treat their own people with contempt!
@@jeffcxx nope, what a try hard. Britnat unit out in full force today. Labour shills in tears. Many of us knew how corrupt the British state was before this sordid incident and polling for Scottish indy sits at 50% without even campaigning. This was the death knell for the UK. Thank fuck. #Indyscotlandnow
They argue to vote remain as they don’t produce anything and have zero economy so wouldn’t exist on their own. Plus they are heavily subsidised by England.
"...reflects an outdated approach" The whole of Westminster is an outdated approach. Time to put in the past and focus on modernising and improving the Scottish parliament. We have to rid ourselves of this deadweight once and for all.
I saw a pic of parliament during the debate about illegal immigration and it had only a handful of people present vs. a full house for a Gaza ceasefire which Israel has no duty nor inclination to observe.
I'm more inclined for Madam Deputy Speaker to resign. Mr Speaker did what he thought was right, and I support that decision. However, Madam Deputy Speaker, the member for Doncaster Central, rammed through 2 divisions, which shouldn't have been allowed treating all members with utter contempt. Although I respect Madam Deputy Speaker, I really do feel it's time for her to resign.
As an American, I actually find this level of self-reflection and autopsy being done on the floor of the House to be incredibly refreshing. This level of inquiry and holding presiding officers accountable in open session on the basis of rules, precedent and procedure - as compared to the purely political fiasco that was the ouster of U.S. House Speaker McCarthy - is actually healthy, in my view. I also find Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg to be at his best when he valiantly rises in defense of the procedures of the House, with historical perspective and aplomb.
I really like him tbh. He's clear, concise, driven and at least on the Israel/Gaza matter completely right. The fact that the Speaker AND Deputy Speaker have allowed Labour to insert their language into what should've been the vote on the SNP's motion, DURING SNP's OPPOSITION DAY, is absolutely DISGUSTING! The two of them have single-handedly robbed SNP of their vote, while preventing a huge row in the Labour party. That row could've cost Labour votes which would've been picked up by other parties. With the exception of Labour/Kid Starver, everybody lost yesterday.
Yeah, but it's all bluster. The intention of the SDP motion and the Tory amendment was to embarrass the Labour Party. As it turned out the Labour amendment was stronger than the SDPs and the SDP motion was lost as always when an amendment is passed. He might be seen to be making a strong point but it's not because he's outraged about the amended motion but because it failed to embarrass the Labour Party.
As a foreigner... it's not really showing me anything. I honestly don't get what exactly they're arguing over and why. I get that it's something to do with procedures, but that's about it. They're not arguing over substance, but procedure and they're all really angry and... ok... I don't see what the big deal is. This is how it comes across to me at least. I already knew the UK Parliament has a lot of angry, shouty stuff, so this just seems normal. That's how they operate. Nothing unusual.
@@octavianpopescu4776 Israel v. Gaza, is a situation created to mask that Israel has embarrassed itself, "oh, go ahead blame us for this then", these cartoons are there to provide a 'civilian' shadow of the situation. If you want the back story:- A decision was taken to push up oil prices in 2000's, Saudi's wanted to remain the friendly effortless mobility providers and blindly retaliated immediately where they believe the threat was concept. Iran decided to shroud their motives to the unraveling saga, thus the war on 'shrouding?' in Iraq/Iran, I guess they would undercut the market and those manipulating the market would have never seen the benefit in their lifetimes. Now the wars are de-escalated these Western cartoons are looking for scapegoats and distractions.
@@octavianpopescu4776 They're arguing over the fact that the SNP has been denied the ability to propose changes to legislation. This done in a way that is basically arbitrary - the speaker's reasons aren't terribly convincing. The SNP nominally represents the interests of Scotland. Denying the SNP their right to speak because English parties are uncomfortable with what they're saying looks very bad. We're constantly at risk of Scotland leaving the UK, and Westminster appearing to favour England is one of the big arguments for that. This "insubstantial argument" will result in a lot of very unhappy Scottish people who feel, whether they agree with the SNP's motion or not, that they've been trampled on again in favour of English politics. The SNP - and Scottish secession - was basically dead in the water, but this may bring them back to life if they play it right. It doesn't look like anything of substance because you don't have context of the backdrop against which this is happening. And none of this is to mention the fodder this will be for the "immigration = islamist terrorism" crowd.
Like the majority of the electorate, I am shattered beyond belief what has took place yesterday with the Leader of the Opposition, the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the House. Their behaviour has reduced me to tears. I never believed this could happen in the UK. It’s time to really fight for our country.
Can you explain in detail what upset you so much? I'm finding it hard to understand why ks and the speaker have been exceptionally bad, when it seems like all three parties were cynically trying to catch each other out on procedural points rather than truly acting in the interests of the Gazans...
@@trevfindley it was a day allocated to the SNP for them to put forward their bill…they are allocated three of these each year. Labour are allocated 15 per year. Labour (Keir Starmer) ambushed the Bill because the Labour backer benchers were going to divide Labour’s vote with a 50/50 vote. Starmer did not listen to the advise of his Chief Whip which was not to interfere. Starmer and the Speaker had a very loud and public argument as Starmer was trying to pervert the course of justice with the Speaker who sits with a bias towards any party. The Speaker was convinced by Starmer to accept an addition to the SNP Bill. Starmer claimed that his MPs would be in danger with their constituents if they voted against the amendment. It seems the Speaker was swayed by this argument which he should not have. When he announced it, the House went into absolute chaos, the behaviour of which has been seen very rarely. What it all boils down to is Starmer, as a maybe future PM could not be seen to have the split of his MPs at this stage so swayed the Speaker which has now taken away all authority of the Speaker. Starmer turned the SNP day into a Labour day. Starmer is showing his bias towards a minority in this country.
@@jamesorr4061 if you understood what took what and what has been happening not only in Parliament but also in the work place and general society, you would be extremely concerned.
We really do need to reform this unruly, schoolyard behaviour. Everyone screaming and shouting like toddlers. It is intensely embarassing to everyone in this country.
Is that a Scottish independence referendum I see on the horizon? I'm not a massive SNP fan but after last night's clown show I would find it hard to argue for the remain position..
Actual embarrassment. Anyone really ready to remove all these fools permanently? Children are told off for acting this way in school like..... 😂😂😂 Wtf is going on around this world. How did we end up with these lot in power?? Absolute clowns!
Imagine wrecking your own knees, back and liver and getting a dozen flavours of PTSD spending 22 years risking your life for this mob and the readers of the _Daily Mail._
There is no conscription in this country - respectfully… you knew what you signed up for . And I say this as the nephew of someone who served in the armed forces and died homeless of ptsd and depression related causes . My condolences anyway I suppose . 😞
Surely, i would hope you didnt do all that for our leaders?! Did you not do it instead for personal reasons? For your family? Community? Your country? I would think surely you did it for these more noble things! Thankyou for your service
My gosh! These are the people that represent the United Kingdom. These are supposed to be Educated people? Our LEADERS? This is an absolute embarrassment to say the truth, they are our Politicians with no example to our nation. When they behave in this manner, what behavior should be carried out on our street or in public when this is the example that is being shown by these Politicians. This is absolutely unacceptable, this is what our taxpayers are paying for. Shameful behaviour, they all are an embarrassment sadly. Growing up, when we travelled, people would always say, how the English people are so well mannered, that we hold such high standards, our products are so well built. Now! I feel ashamed and I wonder what does same people would say now? It sad to see over the last 20 years and even more, especially last 10 years. Where are we heading, what are going to happen to our grand children, really sad.
You have a strange view on history, when the "dark ages" took place, reasons for that 1707 parliament (due in no small part to Scotlands misadventures in Panama), and how many reforms the British Parliament has had since 1707. First of all since 1801, Great Britain is no longer the Nation in question, we are now the United Kingdom, and, *the only country in that United Kingdom that does not have it's own parliament is England.* Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland now have devolved parliaments, both the Commons and The Lords has undergone radical changes over the last 40 years. What do you think needs overhauling specifically?
Warning: essay below! Read at your own risk, and with your own critical thinking skills set to ‘On’! One massive problem that everyone seems to be overlooking in this discussion - the original SNP motion included a call for ‘an end to the collective punishment of the Palestinian people’. Now, the problem is that ‘collective punishment’ is not just a casual descriptive - it is a specific legal term used in Article 33 of the Geneva Convention, and for the UK parliament to put forward a statement accusing Israel of collective punishment would be completely unprecedented by current UK legal opinions. Yes, it may be obvious to all of us that what is currently happening in Gaza is a collective punishment, but that doesn’t mean that parliament can make that kind of statement without legal backing - in fact, it’s such a huge departure from the current positions of the main UK political parties on the Gaza conflict that I personally find it hard to believe that the SNP didn’t expect either Labour or the Tories to table an amendment to remove this wording! Lastly - the wording of the Labour amendment called for everything that the SNP motion did, and also called for the immediate cessation of the annexation and settlement of Palestinian land both in Gaza and the West Bank, all without including accusations of unproven war crimes! So, why the SNP chose to leave the chamber in protest against their bill not being voted on (which, I’ll add, would never have been voted on once a preceding amendment was approved, which as I’ve outlined above was a near certainty due to their own wording) instead of voting for an amendment that gave them everything they were asking for plus more…. I’ll leave that for you to consider. My opinion? The SNP just did Westminster up like a kipper, and will be laughing all the way to Holyrood as their support on both the general election and any future independence referendum goes through the roof.
I do agree with your highlighting this. Decent point about the legal or political implications, but, isn't that the reason for having a vote in the first place. You want to change something, like the UK state's complicit support of collective punishment of a population. You could anticipate those amendments being raised, but by who? People who continue to deny what the ICJ has plausible grounds to investigate or try a case for genocide. Well in a vote on that, I'd be very carefully considering my position. Which is exactly where the pressure was being applied. And rightly so, in my opinion. I don't honestly think the SNP is laughing about it. Yes they may well have scored some political or public gains. But I don't think anyone wanted this mess or could even have predicted it really.
Absolutely agree with this. Despicable cynicism from the SNP, and sad to see so many people considering them victims in this situation (not to say that all sides don't come out looking bad)
The Scottish political party !!! Heroes of the day especially Mr Stephen Flynn 💙. You made us believe that there still some humans in the British house commons .
If it is 'Proven True' that Starmer put pressure on the Speaker, if Hoyle resigns/goes, shouldn't Starmer resign /go too? both take responsibility, held accountable.? Who gained from changing the rules? from this chaos? Starmer, and the Labour Party !!
Hoyle will have to have a better excuse than the protection of M.P.s, because this will simply frustrate many, even reasonable people, that their voice is not being heard by Parliament. Placing MP's under even greater pressures at their surgeries.
As a foreigner watching this... since you mention the world, It's not embarssing as much as it's confusing. I've noticed everyone being up in arms over this in the UK, but I'm not really sure what's even happening, who's right, who's wrong and why. They seem to be talking about procedural-technical stuff.
Really? We'd be much better with the do-nothing shitshow that the US is currently dealing with would we?. Good to see you find it hilarious though. A true patriot.
Nonsense, he was protecting Kier's complicity from scrutiny. By denying a proper hearing on the Gaza issue he will only strengthen people's desire to hold politicians to account publicly and further understand trust in politics in general. Corruption in a red tie is still corruption.
Parliament reflects the general chaos which is in all parts of this once great nation. If this continues I can only see our current decline continuing apace.
The SNP had a day to present a motion, they did a motion and then Labour decide to remove it and put in their amended motion, with collusion of the Speaker. WHAT A DISGRACE.
@@phillaysheo8Hahahaha 😂😂, you must be joking. If it’s crooks you’re looking for, try having a look at Gove, Johnson and Sunak and their corrupt vip lane, and the resulting loss of billions of public money to their chums.
They are grown adults 🤣🤣🤣 wow! The every day person, who actually has more reason to act out at their job, would be sent home and terminated or pulled aside to see if their mental health is ok. Jokes 😂
This is pure naked corruption, and it isn't only the speaker's position that's untenable, the deputy speaker is actively running cover and also can't be impartial. Hoyle has always been useless and stupid, but this is a whole new level, and his two post-hoc rationalisations are pure sophistry, with the latter one being actually sinister. Shameful.
There is zero doubt in my mind Hoyle is simply reading out the words prepared for him by Starmer himself. Hoyle ìs clearly 100% corrupt, and he is clearly an idiot. If he goes he will be the latest and most significant person Starmer will have got rid of.
The Speaker cannot say who the Opposition is. If the Government has 2 or 3 parties as its single mandate, that thing cannot be made over to the several opposition parties. This Tory Speaker will have to go.
Everyone was to blame, because they were all playing the game. The only potentially despicable act was if Labour attempted to lean on Hoyle. The rest of it is all the usual game playing.
Unfortunately, Flynn is my MP, and having left the SNP myself, and having attended meetings held by Flynn, I guarantee you, this has more to do with attempting to get another independence vote, by the SNP, than anything else. I do agree, though, that once again, it is the Scots who have shown that Westminster is so corrupt, that it needs to close down, because Westminster should be moved to Jerusalem, because everyone in Westminster is WORKING FOR ISRAEL.
So much time, effort, stress, money and grief over getting our parliament to effectively say, "Down with this sort of thing!" regarding Gaza. This sort of business shouldn't be paralyzing our parliament. Unless i'm missing something. What is the "functional" difference between a 'humanitarian pause' and a 'ceasefire'? And even if parliament calls for a ceasefore, so what?
"Ceasefire" has certain meanings attached, "Humanitarian Pause" is just some meaningless nonsense. It's like arguing that dietitians and nutritionists are basically the same. The former is a specific term that requires a 4 year bachelors or masters, a 1 year internship and then passing a national exam before you can claim to be one, the latter is something anyone can pretend to be without the slightest effort. I'm a nutritionist. Wee, easy. Humanitarian pause could be a half hour where you go and grab a bite to eat before resuming the bombing of orphanages, whereas a ceasefire is a more long term event. And, of course, if there were no difference between the two, then why would Starmer insist for so long on using one and not the other. It always seems absurd to believe someone when they say "These two phrases are basically the same, there's no real difference, so we absolutely must exclusively use mine and never use yours ever." It's clear that they don't believe what they are saying but hope others are dumb enough to believe them.
@@kieranharwood7186 I think you're right about there being some significance to the phrasing. At least to our political class. To me, i'm still not sure it warrants this silliness. Whether one calls it a 'ceasefire' or a 'humanitarian pause' the same can be achieved in the cessation and either can collapse in a moment or last for a decade. Calling it a ceasefire or a pause doesn't put an inviolable time stamp on it. When I think of our parliament as a mad house, it's episodes like this where that sentiment is luridly on display. Thanks for your reply.
Britain deserves better than this , nobody should vote for Tories or labour again,its time for Scotland to get away from these horrible people who are watching the murder of innocent people and doing nothing about it.lets never forget who they are.🏴🏴🏴🏴
"we've been treated with utter contempt". Pretty much how the general public feels right now.....
Came here to say this. Now they know a 0.0001% of how most of us feel about them
Hoyle really has the demeanour of an overworked supply teacher who's just been shut in the stationery cupboard and is pleading for his keys back
He’s an idiot. He can barely do joined up talking. This is a person who went on national tv and called the funeral of the queen “The most important event the world will ever see”. What an arse.
So the English are voting because Britain is an islamic black & Indian state right? I see why you don't vote for a ceasefire in Ukraine because it's a white country
He's a lot sneakier than that. He's looking out for his mate.
Hoyle was a labour mp on the right of the party. He knew exactly what he was doing
Sadly I think that's the truth @@bothi00
😂classic 👍
Calling each other honourable whilst being devoid of any honour or integrity
Treated with contempt-now they know how public feels!
Fully respect the desire to be independent to get away from. This bull shite.
My thoughts exactly.
Come on. They gave you Brexit.
This is UK government people, what an absolute embarrassment, and we are asked to vote, once every 5 years, for a new set of clowns to run the circus.
this country is hilarious
Facts
That's because they have it stitched up! Two sets of 🤡 and the public fooled into thinking things will change
There will never be change unless both Labour and Conservative are beaten by a new party who puts the needs of the British people first .
We are on a loop which is getting worse by the day , the problems of homelessness, jobs , gang violence and drugs on our streets coupled with high prices and low wages has damaged this country no end .
We have bailed out banks to the sum of billions while they carry on like nothing has happed , no body takes the blame and we suffer yet again , the education system is falling apart along with our health services.
All it’s been is either Conservative or Labour who gave run this country post war and yet we are returning to the pre war days of no health services, and no pensions because both are corrupt to the core and unless we the public say enough is enough the loop will continue.
As for Israel and Palestine that conflict will go not till the end d of time because nether can see the wood before the trees and the killing will never end , the madness in the Houses of Parliament means nothing to the people suffering both at home or abroad because all of these politicians live in a fantasy world and not in the real world …….
Readers of any mainstream media are a bunch of plebs
I wish they showed the same passion for issues in the UK
and people wonder why nothing ever gets done...
There is nothing more beautiful to behold than an SNP’s Righteousness Rage
I will miss the SNP when Scotland finally gets their much deserved Independence
This is British Parliament??? I am ashamed to be British! 🙄😢😢😞
Where were you when Parliament was prorogued in bad faith by a previous tory PM
@@mrD66Mbut that wasn’t ‘the parliament’, that was actions of an individual. I think everyone is questioning the integrity of the speaker this time and the labour opposition. Which in most estimates is way worse.
I remember a time, way back in childhood. And the innocence of youth. That I assumed that the most intelligent and efficient people only, rose up to the heights of leading a whole country. I believed that they acted within the best interests of the country and it's citizens. As an adult, I have learnt that was as much an illusion as santa Clause!
And still, we are fed lies and kept from seeing the true bigger picture, thanks to our media!
The truth is that we are in deep trouble and as this is an election year, I won't try to persuade anyone who to vote for, just ask PLEASE, take a close look at our options - none of which is to not vote, or spoil your paper, because apathy is a vote for more of the same! This is the election that our grandchildren will be asking how did we vote.
@thesubinejelly8764 he made one mistake in good faith and apologised
what did labour do, was it anything worse than what Govt has done time and time again?
@@mrD66M you can take his word for it if you want but making a ‘mistake’ in a very serious situation like this still calls into question his credibility.
Labour was reported by very senior and credible journalist that they were lobbying the speaker before the vote in the corridors with multiple whiteness testimonies by other MPs.
Labour are the party who aren’t transparent in their view of the matter because they’re scared of more division.
Hoyles has overstepped the mark and needs to go. An apology does not suffice. I don’t believe this was an oversight.
Force to resignation.
Boo hoo, this vote is a waste of fucking time. Most of them in that room over step the mark. Guess it's okay to bully and scape goat one man.
... re-elected 🙄
Thank you SNP, 💗
Shush
Is this parliament or panto? Those no’s at the end were insane.
Oh no they weren’t
Only because some votes were passed unopposed, despite audible voices to the contrary twice by the deaf deputy speaker.
Hence the division...
@@lukebellmason1968😂😂
Its democracy working. Its wonderful.
It’s so fucking embarrassing. Fully grown adults acting like a bunch of primary school kids.
Literal Corruption
The fact that the SNP only has 3 supply days during a session and the speaker decides to torpedo that after a chat with Keir Starmer is despicable
Opposition day just means you get to decide the days business. Beyond that, it should be done like all other business; open to debate and amendments.
He just let 2 amend go instead of one it’s not against the rules, just goes against an outdated and stupid tradition
Fundamentally it's down to the idea that people couldn't vote for the SNP motion or the Conservative's amendment and so they would have to abstain on a vote on the Gaza ceasefire. It's a mess but that's really it
@@professorpigeon6517 - But it essentially meant the SNP's motion wasn't voted on... He instead put the Labour vote 1st, when it isn't their opposition day and I'm sorry but we know why that happened. He had a chat with Starmer who was worried that half his party would side with the SNP and make his party look divided
Anyone trying to gloss over that fact and say "this is all normal procedure, stop moaning", is willfully ignorant
@@stefmanbrett91yes that’s how amendments work. To argue that amendments shouldn’t be voted on first, is to fundamentally miss the point of an amendment. Amendments…amend the motion.
Opposition Day doesn’t mean get what you want, it means decide the business of the house and then the house decides if it likes the business you’ve brought
No lover of the SNP...but theyve got every right to be incandescent about this..Hoyle is guilty of shocking judgement at best, at worst downright partisanship...in other words corruption...and Starmers role in it all needs close scrutiny as well!!
Starmer acting as though he was King, perhaps he is, as we are all being told he WILL be the next PM, at a time when 2 senior royal family members have "very serious illnesses" at the same time, something that is highly unusual. This narrative of Starmer WILL DEFINITELY BE NEXT PM, despite the fact he has a WORSE RECORD OF VICTORIES AT THE POLLS THAN JEREMY CORBYN. has a deal been struck behind the scenes, resulting in the "overthrow" of the royal family by Starmer, who continues to act as though he was King.
The SNP walked out of the chamber, but the debate had already come to a close. They walked out during the Deputy Speakers speech outlining why their particular vote would not be heard. But according to one SNP MP they did still vote on the Labour amendment in the voting booths after walking out because they felt they had no choice. And that's exactly the point, because they weren't given a choice. Yesterday was one of 3 days out of the Parliament season where SNP get a chance to put forward their own motions for a vote, Labour get something like 18 of these days, SNP get 3. Normally other opposition parties cannot add amendments on these days, because they have their own days to put forward motions. Labour were in an uncomfortable position having ot either side with Government or support the SNP. And the speaker's decision to allow Labour motion effectively gave Labour a way out, otherwise Starmer may have faced massive rebellion because its not clear if he would have allowed his MPs to vote for SNP ceasefire and condemnation of Israel. The Speaker is normally re-elected after a General election so the theory is that Labour privately put pressure on him to allow their motion to go through on an SNP day, or he would lose his place after a massive Labour landslide election. So, yes its all very trivial and petty in the face of Gaza crisis, and it is really sad its come to this. But, it also raises questions of speaker impartiality and fair process in the House of Commons. Debate in our form doesn't work unless the speaker is neutral.
But also shouldn't they be given an option to vote on a ceasefire which doesn't use the language that the SNP's motion did and isn't the government's not ceasefire. Otherwise they would to have to abstain and that would be electorally toxic for Labour, you can see the leaflets now. It's a mess but I am with Hoyle on this one tbh.
Equally it's shouldn't have to come down to an opposition day to have this debate.
Complete agree with this and I find it mind-boggling to all those who are trivialising this, saying "it's outdated, it doesn't matter". It does matter. It's about the impartiality of the speaker and how our democracy functions
If this process was "so outdated" why not amend it earlier? Why choose the day when Labour face a full-scale rebellion to change the process which inevitably benefited Labour
@@cubbyhoo " Otherwise they would to have to abstain and that would be electorally toxic for Labour" that is not parliaments problem though, Labour make a political choice not to vote with the SNP on anything, They even have a name for it. The Bain principle. Why should Scotland's MPs being rode over to protect Labours Election chances?
The Speaker will never be "neutral" - it has to be an apolitical person for it to be neutral - good luck with that. Why would an apolitical person even want the job? lol
Thank you for this lol
John Bercow would have never been intimidated by Labour or the Conservative party. The Speaker should be ashamed of his actions and resign.
Wasn’t the current Speaker the Deputy Speaker under Bercow?
Did this man learn NOTHING!?
Just when you thought these people couldn’t screw this country up anymore!!!
Even when giving an apology Hoyle attempts to place blame on others.
They are all acting like a national disgrace.
they are that
"acting"?
That place, 'The Palace of Worstmonster', is an absolute disgrace and a complete joke.
What's the point of voting to be governed by farm animals?
They are.
Starmer is behind this and Hoyle has played along with it. Neither fit for the jobs they have. Both should resign.
The SNP simply have to play this tape on loop when they're next campaigning for a referendum. I'm not Scottish but how anyone could argue for a Remain position after seeing that clown show, and the disrespect shown to the SNP, is completely beyond me.
The SNP don't deserve any respect. They are led by criminals and running Scotland into the ground. NHS in Scotland is an utter disgrace. The SNP treat their own people with contempt!
@@jeffcxx nope, what a try hard. Britnat unit out in full force today. Labour shills in tears. Many of us knew how corrupt the British state was before this sordid incident and polling for Scottish indy sits at 50% without even campaigning. This was the death knell for the UK. Thank fuck. #Indyscotlandnow
Nonsense
@@jeffcxxthat is not relevant to what took place in the house
They argue to vote remain as they don’t produce anything and have zero economy so wouldn’t exist on their own. Plus they are heavily subsidised by England.
"...reflects an outdated approach" The whole of Westminster is an outdated approach. Time to put in the past and focus on modernising and improving the Scottish parliament. We have to rid ourselves of this deadweight once and for all.
corrupt and rotten to the core always has and always will...money over nation
Shameful stuff
It's time to remove the use of the word 'Honourable' in the Commons. 😢
Democracy! No such thing.
I hate our politicians. It’s like a school playground
Everywhere is the same. Don't think we're special.
they are almost all ..loathsome, contemptible, anti patriot, out of touch bell ends
A school playground full of wankers
It looks a kindergarten
@@limeyUK99not all politicians in every nation. In my country it's not that too much show and tell
If only they cared so passionately about the British people.
Are you lost? Shouldn't you be spewing your bigoted rhetoric on the Daily Mail's website?
My thoughts exactly
I saw a pic of parliament during the debate about illegal immigration and it had only a handful of people present vs. a full house for a Gaza ceasefire which Israel has no duty nor inclination to observe.
Surely the Speaker has to go after this?
I'm more inclined for Madam Deputy Speaker to resign. Mr Speaker did what he thought was right, and I support that decision. However, Madam Deputy Speaker, the member for Doncaster Central, rammed through 2 divisions, which shouldn't have been allowed treating all members with utter contempt. Although I respect Madam Deputy Speaker, I really do feel it's time for her to resign.
we the British people hold parliament and all the parties therein in contempt, it would be wise to remember that!
The UK parliament is an absolute joke....and not a very funny one.
Funny to laugh at their stupidity but also a major concern for the present and future.
So clever with words they cant even tie their own shoes laces.
Oh what a tangled Web we weave when at first we practice to deceive
As an American, I actually find this level of self-reflection and autopsy being done on the floor of the House to be incredibly refreshing. This level of inquiry and holding presiding officers accountable in open session on the basis of rules, precedent and procedure - as compared to the purely political fiasco that was the ouster of U.S. House Speaker McCarthy - is actually healthy, in my view. I also find Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg to be at his best when he valiantly rises in defense of the procedures of the House, with historical perspective and aplomb.
Whatever you think of Stephen Flynn and the SNP, you cannot deny what an effective orator he is.
I really like him tbh. He's clear, concise, driven and at least on the Israel/Gaza matter completely right. The fact that the Speaker AND Deputy Speaker have allowed Labour to insert their language into what should've been the vote on the SNP's motion, DURING SNP's OPPOSITION DAY, is absolutely DISGUSTING! The two of them have single-handedly robbed SNP of their vote, while preventing a huge row in the Labour party. That row could've cost Labour votes which would've been picked up by other parties. With the exception of Labour/Kid Starver, everybody lost yesterday.
Yeah, but it's all bluster. The intention of the SDP motion and the Tory amendment was to embarrass the Labour Party. As it turned out the Labour amendment was stronger than the SDPs and the SDP motion was lost as always when an amendment is passed. He might be seen to be making a strong point but it's not because he's outraged about the amended motion but because it failed to embarrass the Labour Party.
He just sounds like a scotchman any scotchman
And, unlike many in that place, he seems like a decent person. Must be some kind of skeleton hiding in a closet somewhere.
If you like pub drunks when they've been thwarted.
Deputy Speaker is utterly out of her depth!
It just shows to the world what a nest of vipers that place is.
As a foreigner... it's not really showing me anything. I honestly don't get what exactly they're arguing over and why. I get that it's something to do with procedures, but that's about it. They're not arguing over substance, but procedure and they're all really angry and... ok... I don't see what the big deal is. This is how it comes across to me at least. I already knew the UK Parliament has a lot of angry, shouty stuff, so this just seems normal. That's how they operate. Nothing unusual.
Like the rest of the world is paying any attention to this pantomime!!
@@octavianpopescu4776 Israel v. Gaza, is a situation created to mask that Israel has embarrassed itself, "oh, go ahead blame us for this then", these cartoons are there to provide a 'civilian' shadow of the situation.
If you want the back story:- A decision was taken to push up oil prices in 2000's, Saudi's wanted to remain the friendly effortless mobility providers and blindly retaliated immediately where they believe the threat was concept. Iran decided to shroud their motives to the unraveling saga, thus the war on 'shrouding?' in Iraq/Iran, I guess they would undercut the market and those manipulating the market would have never seen the benefit in their lifetimes. Now the wars are de-escalated these Western cartoons are looking for scapegoats and distractions.
@@octavianpopescu4776
They're arguing over the fact that the SNP has been denied the ability to propose changes to legislation. This done in a way that is basically arbitrary - the speaker's reasons aren't terribly convincing.
The SNP nominally represents the interests of Scotland. Denying the SNP their right to speak because English parties are uncomfortable with what they're saying looks very bad. We're constantly at risk of Scotland leaving the UK, and Westminster appearing to favour England is one of the big arguments for that.
This "insubstantial argument" will result in a lot of very unhappy Scottish people who feel, whether they agree with the SNP's motion or not, that they've been trampled on again in favour of English politics. The SNP - and Scottish secession - was basically dead in the water, but this may bring them back to life if they play it right.
It doesn't look like anything of substance because you don't have context of the backdrop against which this is happening. And none of this is to mention the fodder this will be for the "immigration = islamist terrorism" crowd.
@@octavianpopescu4776 Nothing much - ignore the trolls. No one will give a toss tomorrow when the next big RUclips based crisis occurs.
He's got to go.
Totally embarrassing, all parties are as bad as each other
Absolute Fiasco!!!
watching parliament debates take place is hillarous, its like a classroom argument full of REALLY privalaged children who cant take no for an answer 😅
Children in parliament. Absolutely shocking these people control our destiny. Wow!
Thirty thousand+ people have died, and our house of commons is behaving worse than a bunch of nursery school children. It's abhorrent behaviour.
Not fit for purpose. You'd take it back for a refund if it had a warranty.
@user-oj2kz9fd3q
A "faulty" government if I must say so myself 😂
Like the majority of the electorate, I am shattered beyond belief what has took place yesterday with the Leader of the Opposition, the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the House. Their behaviour has reduced me to tears. I never believed this could happen in the UK. It’s time to really fight for our country.
Can you explain in detail what upset you so much? I'm finding it hard to understand why ks and the speaker have been exceptionally bad, when it seems like all three parties were cynically trying to catch each other out on procedural points rather than truly acting in the interests of the Gazans...
I don't think most people are that bothered to be honest.
@@trevfindley it was a day allocated to the SNP for them to put forward their bill…they are allocated three of these each year. Labour are allocated 15 per year. Labour (Keir Starmer) ambushed the Bill because the Labour backer benchers were going to divide Labour’s vote with a 50/50 vote. Starmer did not listen to the advise of his Chief Whip which was not to interfere. Starmer and the Speaker had a very loud and public argument as Starmer was trying to pervert the course of justice with the Speaker who sits with a bias towards any party. The Speaker was convinced by Starmer to accept an addition to the SNP Bill. Starmer claimed that his MPs would be in danger with their constituents if they voted against the amendment. It seems the Speaker was swayed by this argument which he should not have. When he announced it, the House went into absolute chaos, the behaviour of which has been seen very rarely. What it all boils down to is Starmer, as a maybe future PM could not be seen to have the split of his MPs at this stage so swayed the Speaker which has now taken away all authority of the Speaker. Starmer turned the SNP day into a Labour day. Starmer is showing his bias towards a minority in this country.
@@trevfindley I replied to you with a full report which is not showing. I will retype and resend as it is a very serious situation.
@@jamesorr4061 if you understood what took what and what has been happening not only in Parliament but also in the work place and general society, you would be extremely concerned.
Starmer’s insane intervention was the catalyst for this feck up.The man is a menace.
And now he's PM. 'Sigh'
utter contempt is what we feel
Does anyone believe anything these clowns say or do will have any impact on what happens in Gaza ?
So its a gimmick. They just wanted to cripple labour, so tories went on the bandwagon too.
We really do need to reform this unruly, schoolyard behaviour. Everyone screaming and shouting like toddlers. It is intensely embarassing to everyone in this country.
Labour finished in Scotland. Not long till finished in rest of the UK 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Look at us all being distracted by this. It's exactly what they want. Can we get back to the important issue at hand, peoples lives.
Is that a Scottish independence referendum I see on the horizon? I'm not a massive SNP fan but after last night's clown show I would find it hard to argue for the remain position..
I'd consider moving to Scotland if that was to happen.
Scotland wants out of this circus
@@davidhay6015 The whole of the UK wants out of this circus, not just Scotland.
@Rachelforpeace1 What are you babbling about
@@WeRemainFaceless Do it. Why doesn't each area of England vote to join Scotland?
Shameless
I never thought I'd ever agree with the SNP but the speaker is an absolute disgrace.
Why’s that?
@@sulaimanahmed08 I have no interest in debating some fascist Muslim troll on RUclips.
@@sulaimanahmed08Shut up
@@sulaimanahmed08 Why do you hate Jews ?????????
Actual embarrassment. Anyone really ready to remove all these fools permanently? Children are told off for acting this way in school like..... 😂😂😂 Wtf is going on around this world. How did we end up with these lot in power?? Absolute clowns!
Imagine wrecking your own knees, back and liver and getting a dozen flavours of PTSD spending 22 years risking your life for this mob and the readers of the _Daily Mail._
That hit hard 😢 thank you for your service ❤
Thank you for your service.
There is no conscription in this country - respectfully… you knew what you signed up for . And I say this as the nephew of someone who served in the armed forces and died homeless of ptsd and depression related causes .
My condolences anyway I suppose . 😞
Surely, i would hope you didnt do all that for our leaders?! Did you not do it instead for personal reasons? For your family? Community? Your country? I would think surely you did it for these more noble things! Thankyou for your service
What are you? A piss artist?
My gosh! These are the people that represent the United Kingdom.
These are supposed to be Educated people?
Our LEADERS? This is an absolute embarrassment to say the truth, they are our Politicians with no example to our nation.
When they behave in this manner, what behavior should be carried out on our street or in public when this is the example that is being shown by these Politicians.
This is absolutely unacceptable, this is what our taxpayers are paying for.
Shameful behaviour, they all are an embarrassment sadly.
Growing up, when we travelled, people would always say, how the English people are so well mannered, that we hold such high standards, our products are so well built.
Now! I feel ashamed and I wonder what does same people would say now?
It sad to see over the last 20 years and even more, especially last 10 years.
Where are we heading, what are going to happen to our grand children, really sad.
The year 1707 when parliament was formed, nothing as changed, they live in the Dark Ages, Needs a complete overhaul as the system is outdated.
This whole country operates on a medieval monarchiachal serfdom basis cloaked in a delusion of democracy
You have a strange view on history, when the "dark ages" took place, reasons for that 1707 parliament (due in no small part to Scotlands misadventures in Panama), and how many reforms the British Parliament has had since 1707. First of all since 1801, Great Britain is no longer the Nation in question, we are now the United Kingdom, and, *the only country in that United Kingdom that does not have it's own parliament is England.* Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland now have devolved parliaments, both the Commons and The Lords has undergone radical changes over the last 40 years. What do you think needs overhauling specifically?
@@memkiii you're lack of intelligence is Astounding.
That's not entirely true! They can now speak without wearing a top hat now!
@@memkiii radical changes? Like what?
Hope thos.opens peoples eyes!!!
he ignored his own advisors....he's got to go
Warning: essay below! Read at your own risk, and with your own critical thinking skills set to ‘On’!
One massive problem that everyone seems to be overlooking in this discussion - the original SNP motion included a call for ‘an end to the collective punishment of the Palestinian people’.
Now, the problem is that ‘collective punishment’ is not just a casual descriptive - it is a specific legal term used in Article 33 of the Geneva Convention, and for the UK parliament to put forward a statement accusing Israel of collective punishment would be completely unprecedented by current UK legal opinions.
Yes, it may be obvious to all of us that what is currently happening in Gaza is a collective punishment, but that doesn’t mean that parliament can make that kind of statement without legal backing - in fact, it’s such a huge departure from the current positions of the main UK political parties on the Gaza conflict that I personally find it hard to believe that the SNP didn’t expect either Labour or the Tories to table an amendment to remove this wording!
Lastly - the wording of the Labour amendment called for everything that the SNP motion did, and also called for the immediate cessation of the annexation and settlement of Palestinian land both in Gaza and the West Bank, all without including accusations of unproven war crimes!
So, why the SNP chose to leave the chamber in protest against their bill not being voted on (which, I’ll add, would never have been voted on once a preceding amendment was approved, which as I’ve outlined above was a near certainty due to their own wording) instead of voting for an amendment that gave them everything they were asking for plus more…. I’ll leave that for you to consider.
My opinion? The SNP just did Westminster up like a kipper, and will be laughing all the way to Holyrood as their support on both the general election and any future independence referendum goes through the roof.
I do agree with your highlighting this. Decent point about the legal or political implications, but, isn't that the reason for having a vote in the first place. You want to change something, like the UK state's complicit support of collective punishment of a population.
You could anticipate those amendments being raised, but by who? People who continue to deny what the ICJ has plausible grounds to investigate or try a case for genocide.
Well in a vote on that, I'd be very carefully considering my position. Which is exactly where the pressure was being applied.
And rightly so, in my opinion.
I don't honestly think the SNP is laughing about it. Yes they may well have scored some political or public gains. But I don't think anyone wanted this mess or could even have predicted it really.
Absolutely agree with this. Despicable cynicism from the SNP, and sad to see so many people considering them victims in this situation (not to say that all sides don't come out looking bad)
This is corruption at its best.
You have proof of that, or are you just blowing off?
@@memkiiiare you dysfunctional?? They are crumbling over g a z a - because we want humanity
@@memkiii brain d e a d man
Its really not corruption, in fact there was precendence
Feel sorry for the speaker for trying to protect that gang of muppets. Their behaviour is beyond childish; especially the tories
If you look closely you can actually see the strings being pulled.
do u actually understand the job of this guy . Amazing Lindsay love
Never trust someone who thinks they should be in charge
The Scottish political party !!! Heroes of the day especially Mr Stephen Flynn 💙. You made us believe that there still some humans in the British house commons .
I expect no less from a puppet state.
If it is 'Proven True' that Starmer put pressure on the Speaker, if Hoyle resigns/goes, shouldn't Starmer resign /go too? both take responsibility, held accountable.? Who gained from changing the rules? from this chaos? Starmer, and the Labour Party !!
How the living f can we vote for any of these parties our system is dead
Hoyle will have to have a better excuse than the protection of M.P.s, because this will simply frustrate many, even reasonable people, that their voice is not being heard by Parliament. Placing MP's under even greater pressures at their surgeries.
EMBARRASSING TO THE WORLD. A TRUE CLOWN SHOW.🤣🤣🤣
As a foreigner watching this... since you mention the world, It's not embarssing as much as it's confusing. I've noticed everyone being up in arms over this in the UK, but I'm not really sure what's even happening, who's right, who's wrong and why. They seem to be talking about procedural-technical stuff.
@@octavianpopescu4776- As intended. Load of distractory nonsense to divert from the subject matter. They’re all doing a great job for their masters.
Hoyle was the clown either ignoring or overriding protocol. He shoukd go before he’s pushed.
@@lynclarke6184 should be booted out asap
Really? We'd be much better with the do-nothing shitshow that the US is currently dealing with would we?. Good to see you find it hilarious though. A true patriot.
Nonsense, he was protecting Kier's complicity from scrutiny. By denying a proper hearing on the Gaza issue he will only strengthen people's desire to hold politicians to account publicly and further understand trust in politics in general. Corruption in a red tie is still corruption.
Sound like a bunch of kids in the schoolyard, inept
All the while watching this, I had a vision of trident plopping in the water 😂
😂😂😂😂
Britannia’s Trident?
@@greatunwashed1856 Yeah, you know the one that doesn't work 👍
I wonder if Putin had a very good laugh at that little debacle?
Perfectly said.
Parliament reflects the general chaos which is in all parts of this once great nation. If this continues I can only see our current decline continuing apace.
Great British democracy in its clearest form.. 😂
Oh my god this is embarrassing
The SNP had a day to present a motion, they did a motion and then Labour decide to remove it and put in their amended motion, with collusion of the Speaker. WHAT A DISGRACE.
Make Britain Great again.
Keep your eye on Kier Starmer. What a dangerous piece of work he is turning out to be. Needs to be gotten rid of ASAP
Never liked him
All leaders of each party met with Hoyle before the days vote,as is tradition
The guy is a crook
@@phillaysheo8Hahahaha 😂😂, you must be joking. If it’s crooks you’re looking for, try having a look at Gove, Johnson and Sunak and their corrupt vip lane, and the resulting loss of billions of public money to their chums.
Tbf he said that if tories were gonna use dirty tactics he'd "fight fire with fire" a few months back...
Judge him by the same standard as the govt
They are grown adults 🤣🤣🤣 wow! The every day person, who actually has more reason to act out at their job, would be sent home and terminated or pulled aside to see if their mental health is ok. Jokes 😂
This is pure naked corruption, and it isn't only the speaker's position that's untenable, the deputy speaker is actively running cover and also can't be impartial.
Hoyle has always been useless and stupid, but this is a whole new level, and his two post-hoc rationalisations are pure sophistry, with the latter one being actually sinister. Shameful.
There is zero doubt in my mind Hoyle is simply reading out the words prepared for him by Starmer himself. Hoyle ìs clearly 100% corrupt, and he is clearly an idiot. If he goes he will be the latest and most significant person Starmer will have got rid of.
Like kids in a playground Disgrace And Best they are running our Country come on what a mess
The Speaker cannot say who the Opposition is. If the Government has 2 or 3 parties as its single mandate, that thing cannot be made over to the several opposition parties. This Tory Speaker will have to go.
Lindsay Hoyle is a Labour MP and these actions benefited Labour, not the Tories
Tory=Labour
This is soooooo embarrassing WTAF ...We are supposed to trust and believe these rowdy lot shouting and screaming at each other, its disgusting .
I blame the Tories from refraining from voting they new what they were doing
C’mon. There’s enough blame to go around 😔
Everyone was to blame, because they were all playing the game. The only potentially despicable act was if Labour attempted to lean on Hoyle. The rest of it is all the usual game playing.
It's labour that was at fault
If Tories hadn't abstained it couldn't of happened they are all corrupt anyway
...and not labour for lobbying the speaker to break convention just to avoid a rebellion ?? This was literally all catalysed by labour.
Labour has to take some blame for this as w
The only thing i'm surprised about is that the Speaker's 'Friends' at the Israeli Embassy weren't dancing down the Aisle.
They have actual real problems to worry about
This is the Mother of all Parliaments, people
As an ex teacher, ex engineer, if I messed up my job so badly I would have been rightfully sacked. Hoyle is an absolute disgrace along with Starmer.
They have been treated with utter contemp, just like the Government treat the general public.
WHO EVEN IS THIS BLOKE?
They need to order him out
Weak goverment, weak system corrution at the highest level
Steven Flynn is absolutely seething
Unfortunately, Flynn is my MP, and having left the SNP myself, and having attended meetings held by Flynn, I guarantee you, this has more to do with attempting to get another independence vote, by the SNP, than anything else. I do agree, though, that once again, it is the Scots who have shown that Westminster is so corrupt, that it needs to close down, because Westminster should be moved to Jerusalem, because everyone in Westminster is WORKING FOR ISRAEL.
Cant remember the last time I was at all happy, impressed or proud of something to come out of this fucking country. Sick of it
He has to go
"A union of equals "
So much time, effort, stress, money and grief over getting our parliament to effectively say, "Down with this sort of thing!" regarding Gaza. This sort of business shouldn't be paralyzing our parliament. Unless i'm missing something. What is the "functional" difference between a 'humanitarian pause' and a 'ceasefire'? And even if parliament calls for a ceasefore, so what?
"Ceasefire" has certain meanings attached, "Humanitarian Pause" is just some meaningless nonsense.
It's like arguing that dietitians and nutritionists are basically the same. The former is a specific term that requires a 4 year bachelors or masters, a 1 year internship and then passing a national exam before you can claim to be one, the latter is something anyone can pretend to be without the slightest effort. I'm a nutritionist. Wee, easy.
Humanitarian pause could be a half hour where you go and grab a bite to eat before resuming the bombing of orphanages, whereas a ceasefire is a more long term event.
And, of course, if there were no difference between the two, then why would Starmer insist for so long on using one and not the other. It always seems absurd to believe someone when they say "These two phrases are basically the same, there's no real difference, so we absolutely must exclusively use mine and never use yours ever." It's clear that they don't believe what they are saying but hope others are dumb enough to believe them.
@@kieranharwood7186 I think you're right about there being some significance to the phrasing. At least to our political class. To me, i'm still not sure it warrants this silliness. Whether one calls it a 'ceasefire' or a 'humanitarian pause' the same can be achieved in the cessation and either can collapse in a moment or last for a decade. Calling it a ceasefire or a pause doesn't put an inviolable time stamp on it.
When I think of our parliament as a mad house, it's episodes like this where that sentiment is luridly on display.
Thanks for your reply.
Britain deserves better than this , nobody should vote for Tories or labour again,its time for Scotland to get away from these horrible people who are watching the murder of innocent people and doing nothing about it.lets never forget who they are.🏴🏴🏴🏴
Imagine if us “normal people” acted like this in work