@@HamptonsStreetDoc I was thinking the same thing. Just take the hit and press forward. I think i would also start with $40 instead of $160 on EGT to allow myself 2 more chances to martingale.
Hi JackAce can you review CEG's latest strategy called "Nolley Molley" as their explanation is so hard to understand and your's are always so easy to understand! BTW they gave it a double Grapefruit! I would love to hear your rating+ a better understanding of the overall startegy. Thx
I'm still researching the system...and it really doesn't make sense to me yet. I think I understand what's going on and then they do something different in the video.
@@JackAceDotCom Well, I'm happy it wasn't just me that found it difficult to understand, I think if the 1st $10/on 2 dozens loses then you D'Alembert on every subsequent losing bet until you jackpot i.e.10 10 lose 15 15 lose 20 20 lose etc (obviously on a total loss, not a push) and then when you win you return to 10 10. As opposed to winning your 1st jackpot bet (10 20) = $60 then remove $30 & D'Alembert 15 15 etc + always removing 1/3rd from each subsequent win from there on until you lose, then back to 10 10.....that is my understanding after rewatching multiple times! Please correct me if I'm wrong!
Not an awful system but the starting bet of 160 for this bankroll is way too high. Ultimately it's still only 26 number coverage and 12 whacks. Dangerous 3 tier marty.
I'd like to see you follow up this video with the same system but using the D'alambert progression.
Any fool who plays the marty is doomed to lose!!
For the question of the day, I like to consolate my bets. Makes it easier when playing at a table with a bunch of people.
No reacharounds!
Can you show the D’Lambert style you mentioned ?!
Probably better than this
I’d prefer a scale down to 10 dollars instead of 25 and 5 on the split. Then 2.5 times martingale on the regression. Either way, martingale is rough
If I’m up $200, $300, or $400 I don’t think I’d martingale right away.
@@HamptonsStreetDoc I was thinking the same thing. Just take the hit and press forward. I think i would also start with $40 instead of $160 on EGT to allow myself 2 more chances to martingale.
Yup
As far as comps (understanding casinos can differ) do you think going to a high roller table would help being given credit for higher bets?
I got whacked 3/5 spins yesterday playing 5 double streets lol. I’m not a fan of martingale with such a low percentage odds
This system would be REALLY succesful if your goal is only $200.
3 tiers and Marty 🤢🤢🤦
I think playing for 2 big hits and leaving is what I would do on this. Quick hit system 😊
Hi JackAce can you review CEG's latest strategy called "Nolley Molley" as their explanation is so hard to understand and your's are always so easy to understand! BTW they gave it a double Grapefruit! I would love to hear your rating+ a better understanding of the overall startegy. Thx
I'm taking a look at this system right now. You're right. The instructions are a little unclear, but I'll see what I can do.
@@JackAceDotCom Much appreciated! Thanks in advance and good luck dissecting this strat amongst their banter!
I'm still researching the system...and it really doesn't make sense to me yet. I think I understand what's going on and then they do something different in the video.
@@JackAceDotCom Well, I'm happy it wasn't just me that found it difficult to understand, I think if the 1st $10/on 2 dozens loses then you D'Alembert on every subsequent losing bet until you jackpot i.e.10 10 lose 15 15 lose 20 20 lose etc (obviously on a total loss, not a push) and then when you win you return to 10 10. As opposed to winning your 1st jackpot bet (10 20) = $60 then remove $30 & D'Alembert 15 15 etc + always removing 1/3rd from each subsequent win from there on until you lose, then back to 10 10.....that is my understanding after rewatching multiple times! Please correct me if I'm wrong!
@@mynotificationsron2863 I was planning on doing a video for it today, but I'm seriously gonna need another day to figure it out 😳
Hit and run system, high cost big coverage. Get out while ahead.
Is this playable on ETG?
@@dqpaet8005 looks like it. Only 68%coverage should be ok
I believe so. I think the threshold for the "too low risk" message is 30 numbers or more. This is only 26 numbers.
Not an awful system but the starting bet of 160 for this bankroll is way too high. Ultimately it's still only 26 number coverage and 12 whacks. Dangerous 3 tier marty.
Doesn't work if martingale till bank rolls are whacked :(
160 to chase for a 65 or 20 net win.. hmm
Are you biloner Witt all yours strategy?
Yes am biloner
3 tiers with 67% covered is hilarious ofcourse and a good base for a disaster.
Friend #3 got ripped off for $260 😮
Could you make a video on the same system but then with the
D'Alembert approach?
Your games are better than Beavis and Butthead
None of this works in real life
I think It's better with a higher bank role.
Again bad strategy
1st