"We just passed the Patriot Act because we just LOVE America SO MUCH!" "What's that, you don't support it? You must think 9/11 was a good thing! Terrorist!"
"We're also glad to inform you that the 'Taxation act' which didn't affect taxes at all and provided citizens with free Healthcare and constitutional privacy has been repealed! We all hate paying taxes!"
"This is my puppy hating manifesto now to do do an act of terror, from now on anyone who disagrees with the 'we love puppies' act will be compared with me."
If the government actually wanted to "protect the children", they would release the forbidden list. But they care more about keeping a lease on assets.
The "Earn it" act is literally an equivalent of a mandatory microphone on everybody's neck. End-to-end encryption is an alternative to meeting in person to have a completely private conversation...
A good argument has been made that a government approved software agent on a private device is analogous to quartering soldiers in private homes, forbidden by the 3rd Amendment. And if you don't like that argument, there's 4th Amendment warrantless search.
@@hanelyp1 honestly someone should go and make a case for that in court. hopefully it wont result in instead removing this parallel from use in all future cases...
@@boymouto Either this or "public security"/"public safety". This appeals to some basic groupthink instincts that a lot of "simple" people easily respond to. It never gets old.
“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.” - Adolf Hitler
That's the idea. Freedom scares them. Freedom to defend yourself (guns) freedom of movement (cars) and freedom to decide uour own lifestyle (fake food)
@Satou Hikou I personally think peapal are free to owen cars but also shold have right to get from place to place without car and just walk if live in city. When it comes to guns I don't know exactly wear I stand I buleve in right to defend yourself but I've heard about loss gun laws put incressing gun vilence and I buleved people have right to safty to. I agree with food. I think it would be good if their wear cominty gardens instead of going to the grocery store for everything.
@@misssheltered1081 You think people should have the right to teleport? What are you saying here, because that's what I'm taking from it. Cars exist so people can go to places quickly, and to places that are too far to walk to. America is too expansive of a landmass to propagandize walkable cities. It's not a feasible concept.
"think of the children" except when they are AT school and might need a free lunch. That's just too much. "Think of the children" except when they keep being 5h00t IN schools. "Think of the children" except when the government allows companies to dump toxic waste in their water. I could keep going, that's the sad part.
If we asked George Washington or nearly every president we've had throughout history and told them "is it okay for the government to forcefully gain access to any and all citizen's private conversations or activities?" what would they say? How have we strayed so far away from freedom, privacy, and self-sovereignty? America isn't America anymore.
some like it for his time is if the government asked key makers to duplicate key for each house so that the government can get access to protect the children.
NOOOOOO YOU DON'T GET IT IT'S OK WHEN THE GOVERNMENT DOES [REDACTED] TO CHILDREN!!!!! FUCKING INCEL CHUD HAVE SEX LOOK AT THIS OBESS PERSON LOOK AT THIS DISTRACTION REGARDING YOUR RACE STOP THINKING THAT'S A HATE CRIME NOW using your brain is unfair to anencephaly sufferers
As usual, they'll come up with some excuse why they're allowed special privileges when it comes to encryption that nobody else is allowed to have. "National Security" etc etc.
@@augustday9483 I still doubt that they'll be able to enforce this effectively. RSA is not the only method of end-to-end encryption, and as Mental said you can literally do encryption on a piece of paper if it comes to that. What are they going to do to stop me from sending a manually encrypted message over the internet? Or just use software on my own device to do it? My SSD running Linux is also encrypted. Are they going to ban all operating systems that have an option to encrypt their traffic? It is literally a pipe dream. Sure, it will take more effort and knowledge on how to actually perform encryption (which idk they might crack down on that too, if we're going actual dystopia mode), and droves of data will be compromised because whatever backdoor they come up with will be exploitable by attackers, but they can't force me to comply with it. FBI, if you're reading this (lmao can't believe I'm saying this), try me. Come at me. Y'all are nothing but paper tigers istg
@@DialecticRed The way that unenforceable laws work is that almost everybody is, by default, violating them. The government will look the other way and ignore you unless you do something ELSE that they dislike, such as being on the "wrong" side of a debate/issue. Then when you get arrested, they'll use obscure laws nobody knows about to add more penalties to your sentence.
"This bill revises the federal framework governing the prevention of online sexual exploitation of children" Man, when it starts like that, you know you're about to hear some dystopian shit.
Yeah, sad to see how people are more focused on getting happy chemicals and making numbers on the screen go up then self-improvement or making art... or anything actually productive.
They've been trying to pull this "think of the children" crap for decades. Its crazy how this excuse is still taken seriously given the lack of evidence to back it up.
@@itsawill9268 So a tyrannical corporate-government entity with guns, who has been known to actually traffick children, is better than parents with guns? 🤔
Why do the politicians only seem to propose laws that they want? I keep being told they represent me but I’ve never been asked a single time if there’s any laws I want voted on.
"oh but then why don't you vote if you want your opinion heard???" Oh yes, because we all know voting in the United States is fair and equal for everyone. Especially if you don't live in a swing state. It's very fair, the government said so.
Protect children by spying on every communication they make. So that later, they can use everything they did, when they were children against them and push any dissent and wrong thing as early as possible.
Cause "condoms don't feel as good." We're about 3 generations deep into people screwing like it's going out of style and then acting surprised when they have a child to take care of. Nobody is raised with a sense of personal responsibility anymore.
I wonder what lead to their parents being failures? It's almost like the government ruined the world and then blamed us for their bad choices. There are no Americans in the American government.
This seems to be a global thing. In the UK the ‘Online Safety Bill’ is like a turd on a wheel, constantly being discussed but never being put through. You may as well be talking about it! They’re both the same thing. Pretty scary.
Ayy, we do the same here in Germany with several different laws. This is indeed very interesting to see this happen globally and all at the same time...
I'm so sick of this constant attack on encryption! The crap is getting old. And if I hear the "save the children bs again" I'm going go ballistic! Govt overreach just won't go away.
If those more powerful than you infringe on your rights it's NEVER out of ignorance and ALWAYS out of malice. If you can't see how it is malicious, you are not looking hard enough because no matter how dumb they look there is always malice behind it and it's always just a question of time till we find out how bad it truly was.
Who came up with the saying “never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity?” Just because it’s a saying doesn’t make it wise or true, in fact I propose the exact opposite. Never attribute to stupidity what can be explained by malice. No more benefit of the doubt.
Some things can be boiled down to incompetence, like when you're talking about someone messing up your order or someone rear-ending your car on the freeway. Infringement on your rights is not one of them. That should always be treated as hostile and deliberate, because more often than not, it is. And because the powerful love nothing more than for you to give them an easy out from accountability, which is what happens when you assume their intentions good.
This comment is what I've always said. Brilliant quotes @Asdion. If we Can't see the malice & fall for it thinking it's ignorance, we are the ignorant.
A great example of gov not protecting children is the "cash for kids" judge who was taking kick backs to escalate charges against minors to fill detention centers. Law and order SVU even made an episode about it. The episode is called "Crush" and stars... wait for it... Ezra Miller of all people. Ezra miller who held a family with minors hostage and happens to be walking free staring in movies right this second.
Actually some assholes that don't even know how to use the mouse correctly Embrace this act and support it this video actually can benefit a parent that may not have a technical knowledge or Washed by other gov paid actors
@@DaEpic it sucks their ignorance dictates what should happen rather than be an adult and educate yourself, especially as you and I sit on YT. They fear what they dont understand but make no effort to even try to understand, they want a mommy. And that in of itself is so gross and degenerate
Anyone outraged enough to see through these crystal clear lies, will be called names and a conspiracy theorist. It's funny how easy it is to control a population, just call them names and act like they're stupid, and they'll back down.
If Google is analyzing people's private photos with their doctor, not only is that a huge breach of privacy and patient-doctor confidentiality, but it also says more about them that they would see a picture like that and think that it was sexual than anything. Like, who's the real pervert in that situation?
This is why it should be against international law to make a law that makes stuff less private then make the excuse that its for the children,MAYBE JUST DONT LET CHILDREN ON FUCKING PHONES AND COMPUTERS IN THAT CASE?
I want this law passed, but only for a month. That way I can watch with a giant mountain of popcorn as independent and state sponsored hackers have a field day capturing every email sent by a every gov't official to their corporate overlords. It'll make Snowden look like small fry.
People don't seem to realize that banning something only prevents law abiding citizens from using/accessing it. Criminals are never affected by bans, because thats the definition of being a criminal
And of course the government and corporate entities are also always exempt and/or have the resources and legal means to bypass such laws and regulations through intentionally ignored loopholes
I am afraid that soon it will be necessary to just automatically refuse any legal proposition if it contains “protect the children” key word. In the last years nothing but civil rights oppressing bullsht was released under this label. And it is true everywhere around the world
Soon cloud computing and cloud storage will get so powerful that governments will outlaw privately hosted files on hardware. All computers will be required to host all of the file data in online cloud infrastructure where law enforcement or corporations would be able to "background check" you. Corporations would be able to run machine learning algorithms to detect copyright violations and remove files directly from your PC. It will become impossible to own copywritten content without a license.
@@jer1776 Or have a meme that spreads harmful ideas like democracy or human rights? The killbot is already on your way. Your mother got a text message where you said you going to kill yourself now (written by GPT).
How about we just restrict access to the internet for children? We all know it's extremely detrimental to development anyways. It would actually work (somewhat), no privacy issues, and it would fix Ipad baby syndrome! Maybe I'm bias because I greatly benefited from not being allowed to watch tv or use the internet until I was 12. Just seems like a good idea
@corruptedvortex4425 Do you really think the skills required to have an online life require much training? It's not exactly complicated. I doubt their skills would be far behind. I've got a bachelor's in computer scientist, my upbringing was no obstacle. I know 12 is still a child. Restrictions would need to be specific, not just based on if you are under 18, and certainly not based on my childhood.
Extremely opposed to any blanket bans like this. Autodidactic (self-teaching) individuals will have their growth stunted, smarter ones will find their way through sure. It's just a bandage fix that completely ignores the core problems. Internet isn't detrimental - unhealthy social interactions, algorithms that encourage negative emotions, typical Corporatist propaganda that makes products look like cures - take your pick, but those are the sorts of problems we face. Let parents deal with their own children's care, and focus on keeping bad actors away from our tools.
Let's point out the elephant in the room: all these lawmakers just want to sit around looking at illegal images on the clock funded by us, the responsible taxpayers 🤮 that's why it's a commission they're proposing instead of a separate entity
It's the constant return of the EARN IT act that tempts me to run against Blackburn for 2024. But I know that would go nowhere, and would put a target on my back. That being said, I'm tempted more than ever now.
If the government would get access to a backdoor to encryption, that also means hackers can get access to the encryption. So we can just all stop encrypting anything as a whole if that gets passed
I like learning about this stuff but I also hate it at the same time because it just makes me depressed since it seems like there's not much we can do about it as everyday citizens.
Citizen? Are you implying that you have rights? The goal is to reach a point where you have none. We will own you, and we will control you. You will be our slaves.
Seen people argue that its not a violation to our right of privacy since we dont make the app, its provided by someone else and therefore isnt protected. Most people dont make their homes. What if the government made a bill that required homebuilders to have a way to catch and report crimes inside of homes they built? All new homes have to have cameras to monitor and make sure child exploitation isnt happening inside the home they built. Its no different
The name of the bill personally offends me. Earn it? Earn what?!? The right to encryption? So you have to "earn" it now by collecting fed brownie points...
There are actually USPS (possibly other carriers as well) shipping centers that occasionally open and search mail that comes their way. So snail mail packages aren’t guaranteed secure if they pass through one of the major cities that has one of these mail search centers.
They always search your shit, it's S they've got heat guns to preserve your label and they rip your shit out of the box and then check it before throwing it into a new box.
I can insure you that they don't give a single pile of spit about minors, especially if their idea of "protecting the children" includes letting creeps take a peek of your every breath.
Was a psychological researcher. I’ve been watching this and many other things develop for the last two years. We’ve noticed the same things. You aren’t wrong.
how to protect children from the dangers of the internet: do not give children access to such dangerous tools consider the internet an axe can it cut your hand? absolutely what is it's duty? chop wood proper training will minimize hand cuts and maximize wood collection in the same way teaching children what not to do will defend the little buggers from going to naughty site 342 (but still for lord dont give little timmy unsupervised googol™ access)
@@salpertia What's stopping kids from also learning the parental controls in 10 minutes? I know you were being sarcastic, but I legit ran in to 6-yo kids that can bypass parental controls.
There are people saying the Fourth Amendment has an Exclusionary rule that makes detecting cheese pizza this way inadmissible as evidence. It's potentially worthless in stopping what they're claiming it'll stop.
To be honest, if they ban use of encryption on the internet, then someone sends an encrypted file to someone, they could flag that file as being suspicious automatically because it is encrypted. I'm just theorizing how they maybe are planning to implement that act, I very much do not condone this act.
Ben Franklin said it best: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." The EARN IT Act won't make anyone safer.
They never try to hide it. It's always right there in front of our faces. All they need is a couple "mass shootings", a "terrorist attack", a "pandemic", or other national or global tragedy and everyone goes into fight or flight and begs for their freedoms to be taken away.
For what good it will do, call your representatives and senators, folks. Make it very clear to them that you WILL vote for their opponent if they vote to pass this act.
*No service provider should be doing law enforcement work.* Let cops build a case without giving them unconstitutional access to private papers and effects.
heres how to win any arguement where they say "protect the children" "fuck those little bastards, ive heard worse language from 13 year olds who think they are gangsters than serial killers"
I used to work at the secret service and in the late 90's they brought in the guy who created pgp to ask him if he would put in a backdoor for them. He got up, didn't say a word, and just left. Imagine if the big tech companies had just a sliver of integrity as this man. All backdoors weakens software because it will eventually be discovered by hackers. What's app uses end to end encryption but they hold the private keys and can read all your messages.
Australia tried something like this in 2017. Our then Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull came out with this gem: “The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia.” Yep .. 2+2=Potato here, if you want it to. The laws of math don’t apply here.
I prefer Heinlein's razor: never attribute to malice that which may be explained by ignorance - but dont rule out malice. The point is that if you go through life believing that people are never intentionally doing harm, you are setting yourself up for nefarious characters. Instead, we should behave as if people are not intentionally doing harm (until evidence is demonstrated) while reserving judgement on intentions.
Its a nice journey with your channel and listen to your opinions. Even though I don't always agree with your opinions, this video is just you spitting facts. Agreed.
thank you so much for bringing up foster care, no one fuckin talks about this and as someone who's been through that shit, the government really does *not* care about children's wellbeing
as an lgbt person this terrifies me, especially for all the people in US states that are pushing so many anti-trans laws because they also want to "protect the children" even though it will just make the lives of trans kids worse. this is going to harm those at the bottom of the social ladder the most
i thought EVIL required intent. its always the same with these children protections. and children remain violated again and again. thanks fore sharing,man. didnt even know about this.
To actually help, the goverment could mandate an ad to be occasionally played on TV, informing parents about the risks on the internet and that they should to some level monitor the internet activity from their children.
"We just passed the 'we love puppies' act that legalizes torture".
"You don't hate puppies, do you?"
"We just passed the Patriot Act because we just LOVE America SO MUCH!"
"What's that, you don't support it? You must think 9/11 was a good thing! Terrorist!"
"We're also glad to inform you that the 'Taxation act' which didn't affect taxes at all and provided citizens with free Healthcare and constitutional privacy has been repealed! We all hate paying taxes!"
"This is my puppy hating manifesto now to do do an act of terror, from now on anyone who disagrees with the 'we love puppies' act will be compared with me."
STOCK act: $200 fine if Congress is cought doing insider trading.
@@bigbrothertw Classic
If the government actually wanted to "protect the children", they would release the forbidden list. But they care more about keeping a lease on assets.
"I was told that Epstein belonged to intelligence and to leave it alone."
-Alexander Acosta, former US Attorney for southern Florida
Can i ask what's the forbidden list?
@@selmanefarescherifi4283 epstein flight list
@@arkimanti Careful, Careful, You don't want a knock.
@@arkimanti I'm sorry but what's that?
The "Earn it" act is literally an equivalent of a mandatory microphone on everybody's neck.
End-to-end encryption is an alternative to meeting in person to have a completely private conversation...
A good argument has been made that a government approved software agent on a private device is analogous to quartering soldiers in private homes, forbidden by the 3rd Amendment. And if you don't like that argument, there's 4th Amendment warrantless search.
@@hanelyp1that's a very good argument
@@hanelyp1 honestly someone should go and make a case for that in court. hopefully it wont result in instead removing this parallel from use in all future cases...
@@hanelyp1 It's a good argument.
The government doesn't care.
@@wrongthinker843 Well, they have to. As much as they don't want to, they still have to adhere to the amendments.
'protecting the kids' is just another 'video games cause violence' tier scapegoat but one that actually works unfortunately
RIP to all the Non-Player Characters ruthlessly deleted til next time you play that level. You will never be forgotten as I can replay the level.
Protecting kids is the go-to reason when people can't justify something
You can blame the Florida Governor and his ban everything bullshit for re normalizing this crap
@@boymouto Either this or "public security"/"public safety". This appeals to some basic groupthink instincts that a lot of "simple" people easily respond to. It never gets old.
“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.” - Adolf Hitler
Restricting encryption is part of a broader effort to disarm the peasantry, removing the means to resist tyranny.
Why cant i like something twice.
That's the idea. Freedom scares them. Freedom to defend yourself (guns) freedom of movement (cars) and freedom to decide uour own lifestyle (fake food)
@@satouhikou1103 public transportation and walk ways shoukd take priority over cars.
@Satou Hikou I personally think peapal are free to owen cars but also shold have right to get from place to place without car and just walk if live in city. When it comes to guns I don't know exactly wear I stand I buleve in right to defend yourself but I've heard about loss gun laws put incressing gun vilence and I buleved people have right to safty to. I agree with food. I think it would be good if their wear cominty gardens instead of going to the grocery store for everything.
@@misssheltered1081 You think people should have the right to teleport? What are you saying here, because that's what I'm taking from it. Cars exist so people can go to places quickly, and to places that are too far to walk to. America is too expansive of a landmass to propagandize walkable cities. It's not a feasible concept.
"think of the children" except when they are AT school and might need a free lunch. That's just too much.
"Think of the children" except when they keep being 5h00t IN schools.
"Think of the children" except when the government allows companies to dump toxic waste in their water.
I could keep going, that's the sad part.
If we asked George Washington or nearly every president we've had throughout history and told them "is it okay for the government to forcefully gain access to any and all citizen's private conversations or activities?" what would they say?
How have we strayed so far away from freedom, privacy, and self-sovereignty? America isn't America anymore.
Washington would be all for it, Masonic scum
>federalism is le bad
damn if only someone could have guessed this over 100 years ago...
some like it for his time is if the government asked key makers to duplicate key for each house so that the government can get access to protect the children.
@@enochsadventures I thought federalism was le good? Le fun rap man musical said so!
@@enochsadventuresfeudalism?
Government: Wants to ban encryption
Also government: Uses https on their website
NOOOOOO YOU DON'T GET IT IT'S OK WHEN THE GOVERNMENT DOES [REDACTED] TO CHILDREN!!!!! FUCKING INCEL CHUD HAVE SEX
LOOK AT THIS OBESS PERSON
LOOK AT THIS DISTRACTION REGARDING YOUR RACE
STOP THINKING THAT'S A HATE CRIME NOW
using your brain is unfair to anencephaly sufferers
Gotcha moment, average government L
As usual, they'll come up with some excuse why they're allowed special privileges when it comes to encryption that nobody else is allowed to have. "National Security" etc etc.
@@augustday9483 I still doubt that they'll be able to enforce this effectively. RSA is not the only method of end-to-end encryption, and as Mental said you can literally do encryption on a piece of paper if it comes to that. What are they going to do to stop me from sending a manually encrypted message over the internet? Or just use software on my own device to do it?
My SSD running Linux is also encrypted. Are they going to ban all operating systems that have an option to encrypt their traffic? It is literally a pipe dream. Sure, it will take more effort and knowledge on how to actually perform encryption (which idk they might crack down on that too, if we're going actual dystopia mode), and droves of data will be compromised because whatever backdoor they come up with will be exploitable by attackers, but they can't force me to comply with it.
FBI, if you're reading this (lmao can't believe I'm saying this), try me. Come at me. Y'all are nothing but paper tigers istg
@@DialecticRed
The way that unenforceable laws work is that almost everybody is, by default, violating them. The government will look the other way and ignore you unless you do something ELSE that they dislike, such as being on the "wrong" side of a debate/issue. Then when you get arrested, they'll use obscure laws nobody knows about to add more penalties to your sentence.
"This bill revises the federal framework governing the prevention of online sexual exploitation of children"
Man, when it starts like that, you know you're about to hear some dystopian shit.
It’s scary what is happening globally. The evil corrupted society wants no privacy or ownership of anything. It makes me sick and it makes me angry.
Late stage capitalism and criminal organizations working together as always.
Yeah, sad to see how people are more focused on getting happy chemicals and making numbers on the screen go up then self-improvement or making art... or anything actually productive.
You'll own nothing you'll be happy
They've been trying to pull this "think of the children" crap for decades.
Its crazy how this excuse is still taken seriously given the lack of evidence to back it up.
Wdym? Like banning guns? Yeah I think children would be protected
@@itsawill9268 just dont be stupid, its that easy.
@@itsawill9268 So a tyrannical corporate-government entity with guns, who has been known to actually traffick children, is better than parents with guns? 🤔
@@Crygear why so many shootings
as a trans woman, I really wish i could upvote your comment twice
Why do the politicians only seem to propose laws that they want? I keep being told they represent me but I’ve never been asked a single time if there’s any laws I want voted on.
youve cracked the code to american politics 🤝 (and honestly 95% of the worlds politics)
What about a git repository with laws instead of code? Make it public so anyone with computer access can propose changes.
@@jorionedwards why do i feel like this would actually work better lmao
"oh but then why don't you vote if you want your opinion heard???"
Oh yes, because we all know voting in the United States is fair and equal for everyone. Especially if you don't live in a swing state. It's very fair, the government said so.
@@Immadeus I’ve seen 2000 Mules I’m not sure how I’m supposed to even pretend I believe anymore
Protect children by spying on every communication they make. So that later, they can use everything they did, when they were children against them and push any dissent and wrong thing as early as possible.
Why is it always the Failed Parents that ruin it for all of us?
Its politicians just abusing a social issue like always
Because failed parents run the country. They need to focus on their own kids
Cause "condoms don't feel as good." We're about 3 generations deep into people screwing like it's going out of style and then acting surprised when they have a child to take care of. Nobody is raised with a sense of personal responsibility anymore.
@The Wandering k take your meds turk
I wonder what lead to their parents being failures? It's almost like the government ruined the world and then blamed us for their bad choices. There are no Americans in the American government.
It’s all fun and games until a bad actor gains access to the said backdoor.
Considering the backdoor is intended for a bad actor i don't think there is a need to say "until"
lol as if the government isn't
Exactly. This is all about giving the bad actors the ability to act bad.
Our senators apparently never heard of EternalBlue.
Laughs in NSA
This seems to be a global thing.
In the UK the ‘Online Safety Bill’ is like a turd on a wheel, constantly being discussed but never being put through. You may as well be talking about it! They’re both the same thing.
Pretty scary.
Yep, the EU is also trying to pass a similar policy
Brazil is following a similar path with the PL 2630, even the narratives are overall the same.
@@kexerino I'm from Europe and was shocked to see that the same thing is happening in America right now! This literally cant be a coincidence!
Ayy, we do the same here in Germany with several different laws. This is indeed very interesting to see this happen globally and all at the same time...
@@Mightydoggo Bin auch aus Deutschland😁
If the government actually wanted to "protect the children", they wouldn't have let the jeff guy "end" himself.
But he didn't.
@@technic1285 exactly. No one would be silly enough to lose so much valuable information on a single person.
It's amazing that people STILL haven't figured out that Epstein was a fall guy.
I'm so sick of this constant attack on encryption! The crap is getting old. And if I hear the "save the children bs again" I'm going go ballistic! Govt overreach just won't go away.
It's strange that Killdozer only happened once
*Criminal Organization crimes
It won’t even work
@@kapytanhook based
Never give the benefit of the doubt to someone who is trying to take your freedom away.
If those more powerful than you infringe on your rights it's NEVER out of ignorance and ALWAYS out of malice.
If you can't see how it is malicious, you are not looking hard enough because no matter how dumb they look there is always malice behind it and it's always just a question of time till we find out how bad it truly was.
Who came up with the saying “never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity?”
Just because it’s a saying doesn’t make it wise or true, in fact I propose the exact opposite. Never attribute to stupidity what can be explained by malice. No more benefit of the doubt.
Literally Reverse Hanlon's Razor lol. It's how I've lived my life for 10 years. When it is ever truly incompetence?
Some things can be boiled down to incompetence, like when you're talking about someone messing up your order or someone rear-ending your car on the freeway. Infringement on your rights is not one of them. That should always be treated as hostile and deliberate, because more often than not, it is. And because the powerful love nothing more than for you to give them an easy out from accountability, which is what happens when you assume their intentions good.
This comment is what I've always said. Brilliant quotes @Asdion. If we Can't see the malice & fall for it thinking it's ignorance, we are the ignorant.
Criminal Organization moment
bureaucracy at this level is the end of every society
😢
What about the children ? Think of the children!
*joe biden bricked up png*
@@V3locities *joe biden smiles from ear to ear* did i just hear the word children?
but don't think too much or you'll go straight to jail
the government harm more children than anyone else
@@V3locities jooooooooooe baiden
A great example of gov not protecting children is the "cash for kids" judge who was taking kick backs to escalate charges against minors to fill detention centers. Law and order SVU even made an episode about it. The episode is called "Crush" and stars... wait for it... Ezra Miller of all people. Ezra miller who held a family with minors hostage and happens to be walking free staring in movies right this second.
Just boosting the algorithm for a good cause.
Screw censorship, screw the EARN IT ACT, may God bless you all.
Actually some assholes that don't even know how to use the mouse correctly Embrace this act and support it
this video actually can benefit a parent that may not have a technical knowledge or Washed by other gov paid actors
Some shit librarians: God bless you all is *an insult against Muslim people!*
No one: fucking cares
@@DaEpic it sucks their ignorance dictates what should happen rather than be an adult and educate yourself, especially as you and I sit on YT. They fear what they dont understand but make no effort to even try to understand, they want a mommy. And that in of itself is so gross and degenerate
They are voiding the bill of rights as much as they can. Or at least normalizing that you dont have rights when you do.
???
"Human rights" are an illusion under a criminal organization, so the bill of rights never mattered.
If parents were not lazy and were active in raising children then "protecting children" would fall flat on its face
It's always malice from the government,not ignorance.
When are we gonna be outraged enough to do anything about this?
Exactly.
We need to modernize torches and pitchforks to put the cityslicker and glowie scum in their place.
never, they won
Anyone outraged enough to see through these crystal clear lies, will be called names and a conspiracy theorist. It's funny how easy it is to control a population, just call them names and act like they're stupid, and they'll back down.
Only two things can stop them. A civil war or people not paying taxes anymore.
The Government try not to turn a simple bill into more privilege for them to spy on their citizens challenge(Impossible)
The funny thing is that they already do that a lot (see Snowden leaks), now they want to legalise it to opress you with full scale of the law.
If Google is analyzing people's private photos with their doctor, not only is that a huge breach of privacy and patient-doctor confidentiality, but it also says more about them that they would see a picture like that and think that it was sexual than anything. Like, who's the real pervert in that situation?
Hate the "protecting children" argument because its applicable to anything that has to do with privacy online
When the government says that it's for your safety, they're lying.
This is why it should be against international law to make a law that makes stuff less private then make the excuse that its for the children,MAYBE JUST DONT LET CHILDREN ON FUCKING PHONES AND COMPUTERS IN THAT CASE?
@@Damian-cilr2 International law doesn't apply to Americans. The Constitution is the SUPREME law of the land.
I've been warning people about this for over a year, nobody seems to understand that it has absolutely zero possibility of saving a child.
How about it gives easier access to predators, about that.
I want this law passed, but only for a month. That way I can watch with a giant mountain of popcorn as independent and state sponsored hackers have a field day capturing every email sent by a every gov't official to their corporate overlords. It'll make Snowden look like small fry.
People don't seem to realize that banning something only prevents law abiding citizens from using/accessing it. Criminals are never affected by bans, because thats the definition of being a criminal
And of course the government and corporate entities are also always exempt and/or have the resources and legal means to bypass such laws and regulations through intentionally ignored loopholes
But that also means it reduces the people doing it, which is still stonks
I am afraid that soon it will be necessary to just automatically refuse any legal proposition if it contains “protect the children” key word. In the last years nothing but civil rights oppressing bullsht was released under this label. And it is true everywhere around the world
they will just go to something else
Soon cloud computing and cloud storage will get so powerful that governments will outlaw privately hosted files on hardware. All computers will be required to host all of the file data in online cloud infrastructure where law enforcement or corporations would be able to "background check" you. Corporations would be able to run machine learning algorithms to detect copyright violations and remove files directly from your PC. It will become impossible to own copywritten content without a license.
Remember when windows had the My computer folder? Now it's call This PC. It is just too obvious these days.
I've had windows 10 delete Software backup folders that contained old Windows ISOs, suffice to say they already do it...
Yep, have memes that spread hate or misinformation? No future employment for you
@@jer1776 Or have a meme that spreads harmful ideas like democracy or human rights? The killbot is already on your way. Your mother got a text message where you said you going to kill yourself now (written by GPT).
@@nojuanatall3281 Just Rename it, it works. 😁
How about we just restrict access to the internet for children? We all know it's extremely detrimental to development anyways. It would actually work (somewhat), no privacy issues, and it would fix Ipad baby syndrome!
Maybe I'm bias because I greatly benefited from not being allowed to watch tv or use the internet until I was 12. Just seems like a good idea
@corruptedvortex4425 Do you really think the skills required to have an online life require much training? It's not exactly complicated. I doubt their skills would be far behind. I've got a bachelor's in computer scientist, my upbringing was no obstacle.
I know 12 is still a child. Restrictions would need to be specific, not just based on if you are under 18, and certainly not based on my childhood.
@@corruptedvortex4425 feel like you'd benefit from reading up about neuroplasticity a bit more g.
I've seen literal babies with smartphones.
People just need to supervise their children
Extremely opposed to any blanket bans like this. Autodidactic (self-teaching) individuals will have their growth stunted, smarter ones will find their way through sure.
It's just a bandage fix that completely ignores the core problems.
Internet isn't detrimental - unhealthy social interactions, algorithms that encourage negative emotions, typical Corporatist propaganda that makes products look like cures - take your pick, but those are the sorts of problems we face. Let parents deal with their own children's care, and focus on keeping bad actors away from our tools.
Let's point out the elephant in the room: all these lawmakers just want to sit around looking at illegal images on the clock funded by us, the responsible taxpayers 🤮 that's why it's a commission they're proposing instead of a separate entity
Then start committing tax fraud, the criminal organization can't take away our illusion of rights if we take away their illusion of money!
It's the constant return of the EARN IT act that tempts me to run against Blackburn for 2024.
But I know that would go nowhere, and would put a target on my back.
That being said, I'm tempted more than ever now.
If the government would get access to a backdoor to encryption, that also means hackers can get access to the encryption. So we can just all stop encrypting anything as a whole if that gets passed
Everyone one is having their privacy stripped away because parents cant be bothered to do their job .
I like learning about this stuff but I also hate it at the same time because it just makes me depressed since it seems like there's not much we can do about it as everyday citizens.
Citizen? Are you implying that you have rights?
The goal is to reach a point where you have none. We will own you, and we will control you. You will be our slaves.
Seen people argue that its not a violation to our right of privacy since we dont make the app, its provided by someone else and therefore isnt protected. Most people dont make their homes. What if the government made a bill that required homebuilders to have a way to catch and report crimes inside of homes they built? All new homes have to have cameras to monitor and make sure child exploitation isnt happening inside the home they built. Its no different
The name of the bill personally offends me. Earn it? Earn what?!? The right to encryption? So you have to "earn" it now by collecting fed brownie points...
At this point they are just mocking us
i love this "its to protect the children" excuse, its such a shitty excuse, not even children fall to this shit
Their braindead parentz do.
There are actually USPS (possibly other carriers as well) shipping centers that occasionally open and search mail that comes their way. So snail mail packages aren’t guaranteed secure if they pass through one of the major cities that has one of these mail search centers.
They always search your shit, it's S they've got heat guns to preserve your label and they rip your shit out of the box and then check it before throwing it into a new box.
I can insure you that they don't give a single pile of spit about minors, especially if their idea of "protecting the children" includes letting creeps take a peek of your every breath.
Was a psychological researcher. I’ve been watching this and many other things develop for the last two years. We’ve noticed the same things. You aren’t wrong.
What we need is a bill that makes them get a warrant.
how to protect children from the dangers of the internet:
do not give children access to such dangerous tools
consider the internet an axe
can it cut your hand? absolutely
what is it's duty? chop wood
proper training will minimize hand cuts and maximize wood collection
in the same way teaching children what not to do will defend the little buggers from going to naughty site 342 (but still for lord dont give little timmy unsupervised googol™ access)
speaking of injured hands and axes, I collect wood by punching trees.
>WTF MY CHILD JUST DRILL HIS OWN SKULL WTF HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN JOBBERMENT DOOOO SOMETHING
>ban le power tools
people are such fucking retards
@@josephbrandenburg4373 OMG! That’s just like Minecraft! 😱🤯😱😲
And be bothered to learn how to use parental controls in under ten minutes?
You must support Russia
@@salpertia What's stopping kids from also learning the parental controls in 10 minutes?
I know you were being sarcastic, but I legit ran in to 6-yo kids that can bypass parental controls.
If someone (minister) loves a child more than its parents do then such a person is called a pedophile and should be in jail.
This will push Decentralized platforms center stage
oh boy I wonder if the jobberment is will to decrypt their EMFs... you know for the children
#decryptthegovernment #thinkofthechildren
Patriot Act 1.2.1
There are people saying the Fourth Amendment has an Exclusionary rule that makes detecting cheese pizza this way inadmissible as evidence. It's potentially worthless in stopping what they're claiming it'll stop.
Your deep fake is as dynamic and seamless as ever, I mean look at you blend into your green screen! 😎
To be honest, if they ban use of encryption on the internet, then someone sends an encrypted file to someone, they could flag that file as being suspicious automatically because it is encrypted.
I'm just theorizing how they maybe are planning to implement that act, I very much do not condone this act.
20 mins of deepfake gameplay. Let's gooooooo
Ben Franklin said it best: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
The EARN IT Act won't make anyone safer.
Yeah legislation against "something" online. Always an amazing thing
ah yes
the banning or limiting of a basic security and privacy feature to protect children
it is as if they are not even trying to hide it anymore
They never try to hide it. It's always right there in front of our faces. All they need is a couple "mass shootings", a "terrorist attack", a "pandemic", or other national or global tragedy and everyone goes into fight or flight and begs for their freedoms to be taken away.
Quality video, thanks for keeping us in the loop. It’s annoying how often this keeps getting pushed.
The government
Corrupt?
I'm shook
Can we just have an island where only based adults live
Jamaica and Haiti already exist.
@Das Expertenrad Women? On my foss island?
It's called the islamic state
@DasExpertenrad you like having pigs around?
@Das Expertenrad are you an arab or are you not an arab? I'm confused.
For what good it will do, call your representatives and senators, folks.
Make it very clear to them that you WILL vote for their opponent if they vote to pass this act.
Ah yes, democracy 😂😂😂
Totally not a scam bro
Cobson = gem.
cob = coal troon ACK
*No service provider should be doing law enforcement work.* Let cops build a case without giving them unconstitutional access to private papers and effects.
heres how to win any arguement where they say "protect the children"
"fuck those little bastards, ive heard worse language from 13 year olds who think they are gangsters than serial killers"
Can confirm, was 13 once.
the edgy phase is one hell of a drug
a bit sad a lot of people never grow past it
Sounds like the online harms act here in the UK where WhatsApp and others have to give up end to end encryption
as the saying goes "the more you tighten the leash, the harder they pull"
This is also an excuse to look at adults as children, too
Stuff like this honestly doesn't have an excuse. Screw the EARN IT Act of course.
I used to work at the secret service and in the late 90's they brought in the guy who created pgp to ask him if he would put in a backdoor for them. He got up, didn't say a word, and just left. Imagine if the big tech companies had just a sliver of integrity as this man.
All backdoors weakens software because it will eventually be discovered by hackers. What's app uses end to end encryption but they hold the private keys and can read all your messages.
Australia tried something like this in 2017. Our then Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull came out with this gem:
“The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia.”
Yep .. 2+2=Potato here, if you want it to. The laws of math don’t apply here.
Cant say I expect Biden to give this bill better thought if it comes to his desk.
There is this something that unites ex-British Empire colonies. They are typically governed by literal morons.
so you can say that you earned $0 and not pay taxes
@@Shrek_Has_Covid19 or you can earn enough money to buy Australia and then the entire world just by thinking
@@Shrek_Has_Covid19 If only.
I prefer Heinlein's razor: never attribute to malice that which may be explained by ignorance - but dont rule out malice.
The point is that if you go through life believing that people are never intentionally doing harm, you are setting yourself up for nefarious characters.
Instead, we should behave as if people are not intentionally doing harm (until evidence is demonstrated) while reserving judgement on intentions.
'em on the 'nail
lol
Remember, if there's a back door of any king. Then that can be abused. Making your security completely null and void as a consequence.
Parents protect children, not government.
Parents dont control their children either
I am a simple man, I see GEMson, I click.
He will always be a Gem.
Dustson the BBCSLUTson
Its a nice journey with your channel and listen to your opinions. Even though I don't always agree with your opinions, this video is just you spitting facts. Agreed.
"Tell us everything that already happened so we can try to prevent it."
More like the "You want privacy and our trust? EARN IT (Sllllooooooowwlllllyyyyy....)" Act
thank you so much for bringing up foster care, no one fuckin talks about this and as someone who's been through that shit, the government really does *not* care about children's wellbeing
luke smith's alter image looking smoother after the AI surge
as an lgbt person this terrifies me, especially for all the people in US states that are pushing so many anti-trans laws because they also want to "protect the children" even though it will just make the lives of trans kids worse. this is going to harm those at the bottom of the social ladder the most
he will ALWAYS be a gem
Imagine hatimg your own flesh and blood so much that you pawn it off to the government to parent instead of you
Current government is the last thing in this world I'd entrust with "protecting" my children
If I wrote what I want to do with these politicians I'd be put on a watchlist
hopefully the supreme court would step in considering encryption is protected speech
As promised, here comes a view on the tube too, because this is important, it needs to be talked about, people need to know the issue!
We need a constitutional amendment to protect encryption, end to end encryption in a broad sense.
Well PGP is sounding ever more appealing even with the additional steps
Hello Mental Outlaw all right? Here in Brazil they are also making a similar law called "PL 2630" could you talk about it in one of your videos?
Sorry mocaco bro, but he has to focus on issues that affect this country first.
@@ilearncode7365 lmao mocaco bro 🤣
@@ilearncode7365 i bet that you are argentinian ...
Since Evil and Incompetence are indistinguishable, you may treat them as the same thing.
"But don't you care about the children?"
😂😂😂
Fuck the children. And fuck everyone who wants to curtail the civil liberties of adults in the name of "protecting the children".
We'll never have to hear about another Project Sunshine with this in place.
i thought EVIL required intent.
its always the same with these children protections. and children remain violated again and again. thanks fore sharing,man. didnt even know about this.
When your government addresses the general populace like subordinates, there's a power imbalance. "Earn it"? Seriously?
Why don't you earn theSE NU-
To actually help, the goverment could mandate an ad to be occasionally played on TV, informing parents about the risks on the internet and that they should to some level monitor the internet activity from their children.
Who watches TV nowadays.
@@emperorhadrian6011 Also on online sites.
physical billboards would be better, almost every cities have them and since a large portion of americans drive they would all see these at some point
@@users4007 agreed
the goat of explaining this type of acts