@@avinashavin4745 I have been supporting customers in the Siemens NX environment since 2005 and have accompanied many migrations from Catia, Solidworks, Inventor etc. to NX. The customer's wish was always: we import the old data associatively into NX and then continue as before. But that makes no sense at all!!! Every CAD programme has its own way of working. An absolutely necessary work step in CAD system ‘A’ can be completely superfluous in CAD system ‘B’. If you try to continue working in the new CAD programme in the same way as in the old CAD program, you will only ever use the intersections of the two. And if you do it anyway, you should ask yourself why you don't stay with the old CAD programme? Instead, you should check whether the new CAD programme has all the necessary (and additional) features, which libraries need to be created and how work steps can be automated in an associative CAD programme such as NX. see learnnx.com/pf-7/ And, of course, learn how to use the programme; the usual 5-day courses are not enough for a complex CAD system. (but learnnx.com can help here)
It's interesting that other software automatically detects the edits themselves, but with NX, you have to manually introduce the changes, like identifying which line became which. In my opinion, the company should work on this issue.
I don't know, in this simple example an automatism may still be able to make the most probable decision easily. But how is a CAD system supposed to know what the result of my change should be?
In nx there is any tool for automatic modeling features , convert STEP into editable model . For example recognise features in solidworks
Let's try it out, send me a solidworks file.
No i don't have any STEP model , I want to know that any features tools are available in nx
@@avinashavin4745 I have been supporting customers in the Siemens NX environment since 2005 and have accompanied many migrations from Catia, Solidworks, Inventor etc. to NX. The customer's wish was always: we import the old data associatively into NX and then continue as before.
But that makes no sense at all!!!
Every CAD programme has its own way of working. An absolutely necessary work step in CAD system ‘A’ can be completely superfluous in CAD system ‘B’. If you try to continue working in the new CAD programme in the same way as in the old CAD program, you will only ever use the intersections of the two. And if you do it anyway, you should ask yourself why you don't stay with the old CAD programme?
Instead, you should check whether the new CAD programme has all the necessary (and additional) features, which libraries need to be created and how work steps can be automated in an associative CAD programme such as NX. see learnnx.com/pf-7/
And, of course, learn how to use the programme; the usual 5-day courses are not enough for a complex CAD system. (but learnnx.com can help here)
It's interesting that other software automatically detects the edits themselves, but with NX, you have to manually introduce the changes, like identifying which line became which. In my opinion, the company should work on this issue.
I don't know, in this simple example an automatism may still be able to make the most probable decision easily. But how is a CAD system supposed to know what the result of my change should be?
Yes, you're right, but in other software, the problem is usually detected on the hole, while in NX, it detects the problem on the pad.