Its just one of many proofs that Hearthstone RNG is rigged, he top decked the silence. Zephrys the Great should be proof enough and the patents of rigged matchmaking and RNG to keep player rentention as high as possible, aswell
Wouldn't adding Breakdance to the deck make it better? It lets you keep the Edwin stats on the board, it can't be silenced after and gives you opurtunity to do the combo again. You usually have spare mana from coins anyway :3
I still want to see a version of 0 mana deck but in Priest and using Surrender to Madness for "We have Quest Rogue at Home" with 0 mana 3/3's (Or 5/5's if you play both Surrender to Memeness)
I used to play a deck before smite got nerfed where I would play edwin, ideally shadowstep him straight away, buff him up real high in hand (his effect still triggers when he's in hand), then play smite on 5 with a coin, shadowstep him too, then play smite and edwin on 6 for the otk. Was pretty fun. Also made a version with togwaggles scheme and captain hooktusk to put at least 3 copies of smite into deck and summon them with hooktusk for a second chance at an OTK, incase they had a counter for edwin. Ran conceal too. Actually took it to diamond pretty damn quickly too.
I imagine every time Blizzard decided to make a new card that cost 0, Mark will just casually remind them of the ever looming threat of making this combo so powerful it breaks the game.
Should have shadowstepped the dummy in the first game, to protect your damage minions, probably, don't think druid really had answer that would matter in this case
Complaining and then winning anyways was kind of cringe not gonna lie. The Druid was "lucky" to draw removal, but you also started with Edwin in hand and had coin to get him down a turn faster.
1) They're playing Pirate Rogue in Wild and there's a TON of bots in Wild playing Pirate Rogue and Even Shaman 2) Their name is clearly a bot name 3) The speed at which they take actions and the places they move their cursor over are indicative of a bot
From Zero to Hero! Remember to subscribe to the channel and like the video! Thanks so much for watching!
you should try running Chef Nomi in this deck.
Gracias a ti Mark
That druid has the best comedic timing.
Mill Druid completely and utterly wrecks the combo
Mark: “CALL AN AMBULANCE!!!”
Mark: Wins the game anyway.
Mark: “BUT NOT FOR ME!!!”
That first game made me laugh more than i supposed to laugh at this.
Its just one of many proofs that Hearthstone RNG is rigged, he top decked the silence. Zephrys the Great should be proof enough and the patents of rigged matchmaking and RNG to keep player rentention as high as possible, aswell
@@WhiteSharks-wz6kn Comments like this is why we need a laugh reaction in RUclips comments. Get your tinfoil hats out everyone! hahahaha
@@WhiteSharks-wz6knyou are schizophrenic
me when the opponent whose deck is "removal and draw" draws removal 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
@@WhiteSharks-wz6kntell me you loose a lot without telling me you loose a lot
Wouldn't adding Breakdance to the deck make it better? It lets you keep the Edwin stats on the board, it can't be silenced after and gives you opurtunity to do the combo again. You usually have spare mana from coins anyway :3
Then you would draw breakdance first card and just concede :(
Drawing it on edwin feels awfull tho
@@abipolarporo2947it's a 50 / 50
@@abipolarporo2947You could just breakdance one of the other minions on board if you didn't want to target Edwin, couldn't you? :D
@@impkiller5932 That's the only bad outcome tho :3
It's crazy how Blizzard loves even shaman, there's a new 4 mana totem support coming and they're buffing tuskarr totemic to 2 mana
I think tuskar totemic will be too slow for even shaman
@@tgranger3504The absolute state of wild where a 2 mana card is considered to be too slow
I still want to see a version of 0 mana deck but in Priest and using Surrender to Madness for "We have Quest Rogue at Home" with 0 mana 3/3's (Or 5/5's if you play both Surrender to Memeness)
Stone by stone, Stormwind shall fall
I used to play a deck before smite got nerfed where I would play edwin, ideally shadowstep him straight away, buff him up real high in hand (his effect still triggers when he's in hand), then play smite on 5 with a coin, shadowstep him too, then play smite and edwin on 6 for the otk. Was pretty fun.
Also made a version with togwaggles scheme and captain hooktusk to put at least 3 copies of smite into deck and summon them with hooktusk for a second chance at an OTK, incase they had a counter for edwin. Ran conceal too. Actually took it to diamond pretty damn quickly too.
I was shouting at my screen: "Shadowstep the target dummy!!!" lol
"I have totems too! I'm a totem enjoyer" 🤣🤣 Never change, Mark.
I imagine every time Blizzard decided to make a new card that cost 0, Mark will just casually remind them of the ever looming threat of making this combo so powerful it breaks the game.
Mark, tell me all possible lottery combinations except 1. With your luck the one you didnt choose will be the correct one
Lol the number of auto concedes from not having Edwin in your hand should have been shown in a montage at the beginning.
Something tells me, soon we have a 20 mana card, with the effect "cost 1 less by each card played in that turn, give a friendly minion rush".
i just love Edwin meme decks
wouldnt breakdance in this deck be so good? you get edwin back in the hand and you keep the stats on board + rush as a nice addition
and then you draw it first
13:53 he plays Ancient Totem
13:55 he wins.
WTF Blizzard?
i suspect with all the zero cost cards being different types, an amalgom deck might work as well
I like that the first two games aren't even 20+/20+ VC lethal.
2:56
perfect
would've been a win at 4:45 if you had attacked with the dagger earlier lol
shadow of demise is anti-synergistic w Eddy?
That's not Edwin... That's the Ancient One!
Should have shadowstepped the dummy in the first game, to protect your damage minions, probably, don't think druid really had answer that would matter in this case
2:55 The reason these decks never worked XD (and the opponent still lost... ridiculous tbh :D )
We still need a 0 cost pirate and naga
Because 0 cost cards have NEVER been a problem
I dont really like hearthstone anymore but I still enjoy Mark's version of it
Druid had the perfect answers and still lost
FINALLY NEUTRAL TOTEM
Complaining and then winning anyways was kind of cringe not gonna lie. The Druid was "lucky" to draw removal, but you also started with Edwin in hand and had coin to get him down a turn faster.
Thank you for killing that mill Druid. Do that. Do that every time.
Never give up.
why is mark so mad at the first druid having a removal in a 35card deck? he has edwin in his opening hand + coin in a 30 card deck i dont get it
what if you didn't draw Edwin Defias Kingpin
in fact blizzard devs dont think that much anymore at all. no matter the game.
Any deck that builds one minion to be huge is just asking to get rng killed and trigger tf outta you lol
2:55 KEKW
Tomatos mentality
I really hope that one of these days after mark beats someoke like that first druid he just gets SUPER toxic and starts swearing and insulting them
Ancient Totem DIFF!
Why was the rogue called a bot ? 🤔
1) They're playing Pirate Rogue in Wild and there's a TON of bots in Wild playing Pirate Rogue and Even Shaman
2) Their name is clearly a bot name
3) The speed at which they take actions and the places they move their cursor over are indicative of a bot
@@tarille1043 i dont play much standard but when i do I encounter bots who:
1. Play cards instantly
2. Do not hover over cards at all
The fact that Mark won that first game, lmao
And then he barely plays the totem lol
First!
GROSS