How do you judge the sound? It's a good mix you hear on RUclips with it's lossy Codec, maybe with some random speakers. But you thing the Nagra is responsible for the quality...?? That's nonsense.
@@hafibeat834 Doesn’t require an extensive intellect to simply understand that the fact you’re hearing a superb sound, even through RUclips, is because Nagra is delivering it! The reproduction equipment can destroy a great mix or mastering, so it doesn’t matter if the song was created in the most expensive studio by the best engineer.
@@ivoleary6332 If you assume that the Sound you hear is "great", the whole Chain has to be great. So what you are basically saying ist: The Codec of YT sounds great. And you are somewhat right. In the other hand, the Nagra ist not about sound first, it was about tons of features and professionel use. If you ever worked with a Tape Recorder, you knew that There are many Parameters to Take Care about, and that every Tape recording is more or less compromised. The advent of 16/48 PCM-Recorders (Open Reel or DAT) was a blessing for High-Fidelity and became first choice for most Users who could afford that.
@@hafibeat834 Exactly! Achieving Great audio, therefore electricity, is all about dealing with losses. The less you lose, the better it will be. Any equipment degrades the audio, either cheap components, bad design or simply thermal conditions. My point is, a superb tape recorder like this, delivers the sound so great and close to its original that, even after aggressive processing like RUclips and the speakers that we are using right now, the sound is still great. Wow this was the longest discussion I had on RUclips my entire life… hehe. But it’s cool. Thanks for discussing this with me. Cheers
Bro what is that thing??? That would revolutionize my mix down and editing process (Not to cheat on my ampex, she’s tough as nails and amazing lol but still). I’ve never seen a two track where you don’t have to touch the flange to find your beat while splicing.
Great sound, much more pleasant to my taste than the original digital recording, and for those who say that digital sound is better I answer that it is not about that, if I wanted the greatest fidelity with respect to the real sound I would not listen to a full mix of equalization, compression and effects made from a recording of multiple microphones at extremely small distances and from multiple angles with different capsules in the instrument box and with phase correction software. If you want 100% natural and accurate sound, hire the band to perform the album in your garage
hi they are very good for the money i had at the time i picked up otari mtr 12 they are ace for the money and parts are easy to get the high end i don't look at because of parts i have a pimped scully 280 14 i am working on it's a tascam 38 as the kg's of the spool is the same i can use tascam parts a i am a tec work out well
Exceptionally well built machine. Also from Swiss.
Good video,
congratulations on your professionalism!
I have personally visited the showroom and the laboratory, really wonderful!
The sound is Unbelievable! Omg! What a masterpiece! Love Nagra to death
How do you judge the sound? It's a good mix you hear on RUclips with it's lossy Codec, maybe with some random speakers.
But you thing the Nagra is responsible for the quality...?? That's nonsense.
@@hafibeat834 Doesn’t require an extensive intellect to simply understand that the fact you’re hearing a superb sound, even through RUclips, is because Nagra is delivering it! The reproduction equipment can destroy a great mix or mastering, so it doesn’t matter if the song was created in the most expensive studio by the best engineer.
@@ivoleary6332 If you assume that the Sound you hear is "great", the whole Chain has to be great. So what you are basically saying ist: The Codec of YT sounds great. And you are somewhat right.
In the other hand, the Nagra ist not about sound first, it was about tons of features and professionel use. If you ever worked with a Tape Recorder, you knew that There are many Parameters to Take Care about, and that every Tape recording is more or less compromised. The advent of 16/48 PCM-Recorders (Open Reel or DAT) was a blessing for High-Fidelity and became first choice for most Users who could afford that.
@@hafibeat834 Exactly! Achieving Great audio, therefore electricity, is all about dealing with losses. The less you lose, the better it will be. Any equipment degrades the audio, either cheap components, bad design or simply thermal conditions. My point is, a superb tape recorder like this, delivers the sound so great and close to its original that, even after aggressive processing like RUclips and the speakers that we are using right now, the sound is still great. Wow this was the longest discussion I had on RUclips my entire life… hehe. But it’s cool. Thanks for discussing this with me. Cheers
@@ivoleary6332 You are welcome. Still - you overestimate the soundpotential of such recorders or analogue recording in general...
O my. I think I'm in love. Superb
Fantastic 👍🏿
Bro what is that thing??? That would revolutionize my mix down and editing process (Not to cheat on my ampex, she’s tough as nails and amazing lol but still). I’ve never seen a two track where you don’t have to touch the flange to find your beat while splicing.
Nice flange 😂
Haben wollen.... - Danke für das Video.
You're welcome 😀
Great sound, much more pleasant to my taste than the original digital recording, and for those who say that digital sound is better I answer that it is not about that, if I wanted the greatest fidelity with respect to the real sound I would not listen to a full mix of equalization, compression and effects made from a recording of multiple microphones at extremely small distances and from multiple angles with different capsules in the instrument box and with phase correction software. If you want 100% natural and accurate sound, hire the band to perform the album in your garage
I like the music, that starts at 1:33. What's the name of the band and the track?
Dave Weckl Band - Panda's dream. One of my favorite as well :)
ruclips.net/video/_V1fX1OjPUc/видео.html
@@Analogplanet_Video Big thank you ❤❤👍👍
You're welcome Andreas 😀@@andreasg7834
Выше всяких похвал..
Dang! Wished I had one. I can only imagine how much they cost!
Skyfi in eagle Rock NJ has one...I think still....asking price is about
50,000
Waaaay outa my price range! 😮😮😮
Hello! Do you have Studer B67 or Studer A807 for sale?
Best regards, Andrey
That is truly a thing of beauty.
Cant beat the TAPe
How much does one cost to buy and maintain?
50k
❤❤❤
Me wants!
hi they are very good for the money i had at the time i picked up otari mtr 12 they are ace for the money and parts are easy to get the high end i don't look at because of parts
i have a pimped scully 280 14 i am working on it's a tascam 38 as the kg's of the spool is the same i can use tascam parts a i am a tec work out well
Mmm, that sound...
Yeah that sound - throu a *lossy YT-Codec*!
Mhmmm. Analogue can't be beaten, right??
It's alive.
@@kensmechanicalaffair IT'S ALIVE!
heb deze nog nooit gezien
A dream
si,e ho Rostov 105...
Looks expensive
левый канал на высоких частотах подзанижен маленько )
holy fucking god
Blimey