Why Now? The Urgency of Advancing Religious Liberty in the Muslim World

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
  • For more on this event, please visit: bit.ly/vpJhh2
    For more on the Berkley Center visit: berkleycenter.g...
    March 1st, 2012 | This event celebrated the rollout of a new book, Religious Freedom: Why Now? Defending an Embattled Human Right, authored by RFP Associate Director Timothy Shah, under the auspices of the Witherspoon Institute's Task Force on International Religious Freedom, chaired by RFP Director Thomas Farr. The event was co-sponsored by the Religious Freedom Project and the Witherspoon Institute. The keynote address was delivered by Robert P. George of Princeton University. Panels featured a wide range of participants, including noted Muslim scholar Sheikh Hamza Yusuf.
    Why now? Religious freedom is under sustained pressure today around the world. In some places, it is fair to say that religious freedom is under siege. The publication of Religious Freedom: Why Now? is a response to that sobering fact. Although scant attention is paid by governments, the academy, or the media, the implications of this crisis-and we contend that it is a crisis-are quite serious. A worldwide erosion of religious freedom is causing large-scale human suffering, grave injustice, and significant threats to international peace and security.
    For the last three years, the Witherspoon Institute's Task Force on International Religious Freedom -- under Tom Farr's chairmanship -- has examined the various dimensions of the challenge faced by religious freedom, and has deliberated on the most effective policy responses by the United States and other governments around the world. In May 2011, the Witherspoon Institute convened an unprecedented interdisciplinary meeting in Princeton, New Jersey of more than thirty experts on the subject, from the fields of psychology, sociology, law, philosophy, theology, political science, and international relations. They included academics, policy analysts, and journalists, as well as advocates and adherents from a variety of religious traditions. The result was a focused discussion over two days of the basis of religious freedom, its present condition, and the prospects for its future.
    Religious Freedom: Why Now? is the Task Force's considered statement on these matters. Drafted by RFP Associate Director Timothy Samuel Shah, with contributions from the Witherspoon Institute's Matthew J. Franck and the members of the Task Force, it is informed by insights from all these academic disciplines and religious traditions.

Комментарии • 32

  • @walidahmed3000
    @walidahmed3000 5 лет назад +19

    Shaykh Hamza Yusuf 39:27 , 1:01:54 , 1:10:39 , 1:17:13

  • @tehtapemonkey
    @tehtapemonkey 11 лет назад +10

    "We can't solve all the world's problems in 10 minutes... it usually takes me 20." Masha'Allah

    • @manuelnunez8802
      @manuelnunez8802 2 года назад

      Yeah, he has always had a really great, dry sense of humor.

  • @sonofJurell
    @sonofJurell 8 лет назад +14

    can someone please post the times when Hamza Yusuf speaks so I can just get to the good stuff!

  • @mdhossen7788
    @mdhossen7788 10 лет назад +3

    Peace & freedom it's should start from ourself first .
    We should not pointing others .
    Thanks a lot brother Hamza .
    May Allah ( SWT )give you more Hikmah to spread the true word peace .
    Love you always .

  • @moves2008
    @moves2008 10 лет назад +2

    what a peaceful conversation.

  • @azeemos
    @azeemos 2 года назад +1

    I agree with freedom of religion but can we agree to disagree on how to define freedom?

  • @timran8553
    @timran8553 11 лет назад +3

    Everytime I hear the shaykh is always something interesting.

  • @samiware1704
    @samiware1704 9 лет назад +1

    Hey ... what the hell do you mean ??? Shiekh Hamza doesn't do desperate efforts to be included under that category. There is a contradiction in your comment.

  • @muhammadkhairulizat
    @muhammadkhairulizat 2 года назад

    So what happened to some religious concept??? 🤔🤔🤔

  • @muhammadalijauhar3553
    @muhammadalijauhar3553 2 года назад +1

    ♥️

  • @samiware1704
    @samiware1704 9 лет назад +4

    The first two members are liars, and the next two are the slappers who slapped the first ones on their faces. well done Shiekh Hamza.

  • @muhammadkhairulizat
    @muhammadkhairulizat 2 года назад

    Because those people are blind faith 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

  • @FPM-RDCONGO
    @FPM-RDCONGO 2 года назад

    We ar goorweng to open the fest sacture in DRCongo Africa and we can't help to solve all the world's problems and we mast promot the culture of Peace.

  • @DC-wp6oj
    @DC-wp6oj 9 лет назад +1

    is that a brown version of Tony Blair sat next to hamza yusuf

  • @karimhamedsaleh7916
    @karimhamedsaleh7916 2 года назад

    Decieving skills 100%

  • @russell6011
    @russell6011 3 года назад

    Every abrahamic religion is totalitarian in its texts and practice. The dear leader's will is more important than the impact its will has on people. Once you believe that you have the rulership on your side that is the end all judge and executioner of the law it imposes, then the followers feel they are immune from the push back of people they are violating. To make a good person perform evil acts, you need them to be religious. Where you care more about appeasing the dear leader than you do for your fellow human, animal, planet, etc. Just following the orders of the dear leader is just shelving your ability to ever morally assess your actions because you've convinced yourself, through the masochistic dehumanization of people, that people are born broken and are unable to discover the good for humanity, so you appeal to a dear leader for all moral practice and governance regardless of its actual impact through your actions. What every religious person needs to understand, just because you believe your deity's moral position is correct, does not mean that any else should care about what your deity wants. You have to argue and convince people of your moral assessments and actions. Its not an authoritarian dictation that makes this correct. Its not having the power to enforce your argument that makes your moral assessment correct.

    • @SimpleReally
      @SimpleReally 2 года назад

      "to make a good person perform evil acts, you need them to be religious"
      whoever believes this horeshit needs to open a history book and pick literally any war in the 20th century. non-religious seculars have literally rationalized using nukes, "it ended the war faster", you're embarrassing yourself.

  • @dannydaniel4952
    @dannydaniel4952 9 лет назад +1

    Peace and freedom is in christ. Just recive it, All is free just test it.

    • @samiware1704
      @samiware1704 9 лет назад +1

      danny daniel yes that's right, but under the umbrella of Islam.

    • @Drfau1710
      @Drfau1710 5 лет назад +1

      True Christ is in Islam brother

  • @tehtapemonkey
    @tehtapemonkey 11 лет назад

    It's a shame how, to some people, freedom of religion only means, "Freedom to follow MY religion."

  • @dannydaniel4952
    @dannydaniel4952 9 лет назад

    Christ is the only solution to all over world. I was muslim befor and after belive jesus christ i realiz it.

    • @OnlyHIM01
      @OnlyHIM01 4 года назад

      😭😭😭

    • @AllTruth05
      @AllTruth05 3 года назад +4

      And my christian friend becomes muslim yesterday his whole family accepted islam.
      Why you left islam people are joining the religion Islam......

    • @Muhammad-Imran04
      @Muhammad-Imran04 2 года назад +2

      So u were in a right path now u went back to darkness. So sorry for u.

    • @muhammadkhairulizat
      @muhammadkhairulizat 2 года назад

      You truly forget why are you a Muslim 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️