I dont understand why it contributes all of pixels , like multiplied with each one ? I was imagined that, a matrix with normally distributed ( 0 to 255 etc ) intensity values, will be added directly to the input image. If this was the case, the histogram would be dramatically different. But why it is not like that ?
I dont understand why it contributes all of pixels , like multiplied with each one ? I was imagined that, a matrix with normally distributed ( 0 to 255 etc ) intensity values, will be added directly to the input image. If this was the case, the histogram would be dramatically different.
But why it is not like that ?
sir what is a and b in rayleigh Noise???