V3 Vacuum assisted solder stencil box
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- Update April 2022:
This is no longer the newest version of the box. This is, • Solder pasting with a ...
Currently working on the video and release files for it. Will be here today or within the weekend.
-----------------------
The newest version of my vacuum assisted magic solder stencil box. Makes soldering components to your pcb / circuit board super easy by getting am awesome solder stencilling job all the time. All you need is a 3d printer, a bunch of print time, and a vacuum cleaner.
The vacuum cleaner sucks down the stencil to the pcb / circuit board super tight so you can apply solder paste like a total newbie, and still get good paste jobs.
When you turn off the vacuum, the stencil automatically gets lifted up in a perfect 90 degree way from the pcb / circuit board.
This box version is a fixed size, my previous one was fully parametric. Now only the vacuum nozzle is parametric. The upgraded stencil vacuum chambers was too much for me to do parametric at this time.
If you think others would find this interesting, please share it with them. And for some god sake, subscribe!
Download and test it here:
Hackaday project link:
hackaday.io/pr...
Github link:
github.com/Mar...
Thingiverse link:
www.thingivers...
My other social media:
Twitch:
/ mariusrh
Instagram:
/ mariusheier
Join my discord:
/ discord
Jeg er beste venen til sønnen din
Fantastic design! Will this system work with small thin flexible circuit boards or what would it take to modify it? Also, would I need to 3d print my own circuit board holder for each different sized board that I make? Thanks!
Cool design. I don't use vacuum cleaner nor have one. I wonder how "suction" it required, maybe in terms of L/min, to properly hold the PCB and stencil?
Is it worth it to try to use some low end industrial vacuum pump or a DC one even?
Thanks. I used vacuum cleaner because of the high cfm.. So I didn't need for it to be sealed good. But if you hsve tented vias snd no holes trough it might work. :)
Very cool design. Glad I found your channel, subbed.
Thanks man. That means alot ;) Merry xmas. I also have a discord and twitch if you wanne hang out. ;)
Your video's are looking great and I look forward to the Live Streams, nice work on the Vacuum Assist stencil holder....cheers.
Thanks Andy. Its getting better. And i really looking forward to streaming. :)
Have you tried your box with Polyimide stencils?
Nope. But it should work unless there is something im not thinking of. :)
Very cool design. I wanted to print and test it out but i couldn't find the file for the bottom box.
Did you see the github page or thingiverse?
@@MariusHeier1 yes i checked them both. But i can't find the base box
@@m.zakiiii5234 Let me look for it tomorrow ;)
@@MariusHeier1 have you checked it?
@@m.zakiiii5234 YEAH! I just did now. You are absolutely right. It is missing. Lets get it up there.
Coool. Tnx
I've been looking at your design compared to the one by Unexpected Maker here: ruclips.net/video/5iX61nD94cg/видео.html and I really like a few features of yours that are making me lean towards building this one, like the spring lifters and the threaded vacuum release valve, but one feature of the UM design that could really benefit yours here would be if you made the vacuum inlet into a modular panel design, so people can more easily create their own inlet nozzles to fit their particular vacuum hose. Just a thought. Awesome design though, and thanks for sharing the model!
Yup. Im gonna try to make a new version soon with changes. ;)
@@MariusHeier1 While you're at it, the tolerances on the threaded parts should be increased, and you should chamfer the edge of the threaded parts. Also, the retainers are the wrong size (too short in the longest dimension by about 10mm).
The new one is very different. But operates on the same technological principles
Really nice design! I only wish you made use of components in fusion360, would make for a much nicer fusion design that is a lot easier to edit.
This V2 has a fully parametric version of it. The link is in the description. ruclips.net/video/9BKQ18qDeZQ/видео.html
@@MariusHeier1 yeah no, this is not at all what I'm trying to say. Of course it's nice to have custom parameters in a design that can be easily adjusted, but my critique really was about how you constructed the file. I'm sure the way the timeline looks made sense at the time when you made it, but for someone who did not make it, the timeline is just one straight line of unstructured mess that is extremely easy to break.
By utilizing components, you can bring much more order into your design and make it easy for people who did not do make the design to grasp what the designer was thinking. I know this adds another layer of complexity, but it comes with the benefit that your design is much more robust to upstream failures when you change stuff early in the timeline.
@@wolfganglienbacher Yeah. You are right. Im going to make a new box.