3rd Circuit Cites Bigoted Laws to Uphold Federal Non-Violent Felon Gun Ban |Podcast Clips

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 окт 2024

Комментарии • 48

  • @rev.zackbennett7415
    @rev.zackbennett7415 Год назад +22

    Historically, if a felon completed his sentence, there were NO restrictions on them possessing firearms. In fact, there are STILL laws on the books stating that upon release they are to be given money, a horse, and a gun.

    • @Floridaman6815
      @Floridaman6815 Год назад +4

      Really nice to think that in the Wild West you could get a gun and a horse and some money to get back on your feet

    • @jefferydavis8993
      @jefferydavis8993 10 месяцев назад +2

      It’s still on Missouri books just not used

  • @warlock.420
    @warlock.420 Год назад +27

    If they want to keep the unconstitutional laws preventing people who are called felons from possession of a firearm, then we should change the law where only violent crimes are felonies.

    • @jringo45acp
      @jringo45acp Год назад

      The historical definition of felony was "a very serious crime". Now it's "anything we don't want you to do". American government is a terrorist organization.

    • @djcoolv4084
      @djcoolv4084 Год назад +2

      Me personally I just lost my son to gun violence and who are they to tell me what I can and can't do when you are born with the rights 😢

    • @jringo45acp
      @jringo45acp Год назад

      @@djcoolv4084 I'm sorry for your loss.

    • @djcoolv4084
      @djcoolv4084 Год назад +1

      @@jringo45acp appreciate its been a ruff three weeks

    • @timparr246
      @timparr246 Год назад

      When the 2a amendment passed, ONLY violent crimes were felonies. Felons who reformed, got their rights back.

  • @BertLonney
    @BertLonney Год назад +10

    There is no relief in federal laws to regain your gun rights. States do have reliefs but not the federal government. The irony is that there is no provision in the second amendment granting States and Congress the power to "Enforce this Amendment by Appropriate legislation". There is no such a power. And the Amendment doesn't say :"People convicted of crimes cannot possess firearms".

    • @jringo45acp
      @jringo45acp Год назад

      The indictments are also complete fraud, they literally state "felon in possession of a firearm IN and AFFECTING COMMERCE"... they fraudulently claim jurisdiction through the commerce clause.

  • @TheLolmoose
    @TheLolmoose Год назад +14

    Guns rights should be given back to felons if they never used one when they committed the crime that caused them to get the felony. It doesn't make sense that a human being cant protect themselves in a country who allows guns in the first place. I made my mistakes i shouldnt have to suffer for them for the rest of my life.

  • @journeyman378
    @journeyman378 8 месяцев назад +2

    Here in GA you have to get 3 upstanding citizens to write letters on your behalf as to why you deserve your 2nd amendment rights restored. Those 3 people can't be family members.

  • @MMAGUY13
    @MMAGUY13 Год назад +6

    Third circuit full panel review ruled non-violent felons can now own firearms

    • @Kevin_P_H
      @Kevin_P_H 5 месяцев назад +1

      True! But that is for only the third circuit and will be appealed.scotus will be the determining factor for all non violent felons , trust me I’m waiting 🤞

    • @MMAGUY13
      @MMAGUY13 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@Kevin_P_H we all are it was on just they take your gun right away when you never hurt anyone they all pressed us

    • @Kevin_P_H
      @Kevin_P_H 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@MMAGUY13 only the supreme court can change law! As of now it is still not legal for ANY felon to posses firearms, we are trending towards non violent felons to get gun rights back but not yet. Pray that the rahimi case helps us that will be resolved end of June

    • @MMAGUY13
      @MMAGUY13 5 месяцев назад

      @@Kevin_P_H yes they are most likely going to rule that the constitution prohibits dangerous people not felons dangerous people so that should help 90% of us

  • @markleblanc3447
    @markleblanc3447 Год назад +13

    The practice of Appointing Judges to the Bench by Political Parties needs to be Abolished. Every Judge in the Country should be Elected by the People. Ultimately their Decisions directly Impact the Average Citizens Life in ways that those Living in Ivory Towers could Not Possibly Understand. We get to Pick a Jury of Our Peers at Trial, why should Seating Judges on the Court be Any Different? It is just Political Favoritism and Tipping the Balance of Justice in Favor of One Parties Political Ideals over another. We are Supposed to have Equal Justice Under the Law, How can We have that when the System is Slanted Toward any One Ideology? This is Not what our Founders Intended, but the System has been Bastardized since our Founding by Greedy and Corrupt Individuals who have Forsaken the Sacred Oath They Take when Sworn to Office.

  • @NelsonKennedy-nk4pm
    @NelsonKennedy-nk4pm 5 месяцев назад +1

    Served your time for crime rights restored upon relase 😮😢

  • @jringo45acp
    @jringo45acp Год назад +5

    If you're not one of "the people" I guess no statute, code, or regulation or any government authority applies to you either.

  • @Kap360
    @Kap360 Год назад +3

    If that were the case why didn’t they add that to the 2A because obviously there were jails when the amendment was written.

  • @Andrew-mm1kf
    @Andrew-mm1kf Год назад +2

    If a convicted felon is not of the people then you shouldn't have to pay tax because that makes you not equal to the the other people so let's say in you're not equal so if you're not getting equal treatment you shouldn't have to pay the tax

  • @Hogbellylife
    @Hogbellylife Год назад +14

    I got in trouble for weed when I was 18 . 20 years later I still can't have a gun.

    • @corvetteman0714
      @corvetteman0714 Год назад +1

      Go for a pardon. I got in non violent trouble in 96, and got a pardon last July.

    • @Hogbellylife
      @Hogbellylife Год назад

      @@corvetteman0714 I'm trying to thank you

    • @cuzheavy4079
      @cuzheavy4079 Год назад

      @@corvetteman0714 did you get a lawyer for the process or did you file it yourself?

    • @Hogbellylife
      @Hogbellylife Год назад

      @@matthall2923 nope A guy I knew walked into my house with 2lbs of weed. He was being followed by the cops. I got out of bed told him to get the hell out. He had tossed the weed behind my couch without me knowing. The cops came knocking because he didn't have the weed when I kicked him out. The cops came in found the weed & the guy said it wasn't his so I got charged with it. It was a whole bunch of bullshit that has screwed my life up.

    • @user-du2of3lh1g
      @user-du2of3lh1g 11 месяцев назад +1

      same here!!mine was a half oz of wet weed but because i had some upstairs drying and some downstairs next to a bong i got charged with furnishing a place to store or distribute also had a loaded registered rifle, got charged with using a gun in the commission of a felony all in a town that weed is the main economic driver so i feel your pain....

  • @turtletruth
    @turtletruth 3 месяца назад

    UNITED STATES MARINE (From BOY to MAN)
    50 years ago was my (3rd) third Non-Violent/Victimless DUI ... (Simple pullover arrests!)
    All three offenses were VOID OF VICTIM, INCIDENT, ACCIDENT, and DAMAGED PARTY.
    After serving (6) years as a front-line Marine during the Iranian crisis (1979), (Before having a wife, children, and grandchildren) returning to civilian life (Honorable Discharge) was difficult...
    Can the Bruen decision help this 67-year-old United States Marine regain his gun right for family and home protection after 50 years?
    When DUI arrests have NO victim, NO incident, NO accident, and NO damaged party, the 2nd Amendment "Right/Privilege" should never be "eternally abrogated", ever!
    - USMC (Semper Fidelis) SGT E-5 (5811)

  • @tyronedavis4149
    @tyronedavis4149 Год назад +5

    Funny thing is, the Supreme Court didn't go that far back in time to make the Bruening decision, plus Title 18 U.S.C. §925(a) is not as old as the New York law they struck down.

    • @markleblanc3447
      @markleblanc3447 Год назад

      Justice Thomas went back to the Ratification of the Constitution in 1791, Nothing More needs to be said. All of these Laws, the NFA 1934, the GCA 1968 and Every Local Gun Control Law right down to City, Town and or Local Municipalities are in Direct Violation of Our Constitutional Rights. No Man shall Make Law in Direct Violation of the Constitution, Period, No Ifs, Ands, or Butts. End of Story! The Political Establishment that has been in Control of this Country for the last One Hundred and Ten Years are all Traitors.

  • @amp10872
    @amp10872 Год назад

    I thought giving it bck was up to the state

  • @StevenSchoolAlchemy
    @StevenSchoolAlchemy Год назад

    greetings