Set Theory : Distributive laws (Written Proof)

[@MyFFFFingTube]

This proof is very good, however as some people have pointed out it lacks just a tiny bit of information/comments to be complete. What you proved is that left side (LS) of each equality is a subset of the right side (RS) (you showed that all element in LS are also in RS). In order to show that the sets are equal you must also show that the RS is part of the LS. Fortunately it is just the same proof backwards, however it is important to note this very anal step if the proof is to be complete. That goes for most proofs with sets. Sets A=B if:
1.A subset of B
2.B subset of A

[@bhagyashreeurao7931]

true

[@77Evangelico]

You're right

[@mrinmoyde2530]

Right

[@lawalayinla2908]

Ma can you help me proof the following set

[@iambot8041]

What did u write in the 11th line💀

[@benedictding]

Thank you for providing such clear and easy understanding proofs.

[@YuvarajMadha]

Very nicely Explained and you are actually going to save my exam tomorrow.

[@weird4003]

Bro?

[@natashazulu7229]

Really well explained, thank you!

[@antipsikiyatriKizi]

Best proof on RUclips!

[@michaelaterkucmalek5839]

I have enjoyed your lecture madam

[@sthwalotv1586]

Well explained thank you very useful

[@singhravi9653]

Well explained. thank you very much

[@gayathrik1803]

Very good explanation mam

[@MrNobody-wl4ce]

You save me from my Assignment 🥺

[@studyindia607]

Nice teaching ma'am ❤️❤️❤️

[@VongaiMatizanadzo]

Well explained thank you

[@markchiyuka8781]

Thanks for that i really appreciate the way u teach

[@RajeshKamboj]

A very good explanation mam, thanx a lot. Your voice is very sweet :)

[@MathsSmart]

+Rajesh Kamboj Thank you !

[@MIbtehajKhan]

Thanks Ma'am, you explained really well. God bless you.

[@davidlasry3559]

Well done!! Thank you for your help

[@louise1021]

Thanks so much! It's hard to find a good explanation like yours.

[@jaddu6918]

Good explanation

[@DanishAli-oc9dv]

Good Explain

[@amanxo1]

THANK YOU SO SO MUCH!

[@muhammadhabibumuhammad701]

Nice one

[@ashitoshdangat8890]

nice explanation

[@justicealearner2357]

I love your videos...
I'd like to acclaim your way of teaching.

[@dheepdsouza]

Thank you ma'am

[@harshnayak3243]

loved it mam

[@divyanggupta488]

Nice

[@satishbania5882]

Mam is your name Mahima Chaturvedi?

[@juderono211]

Thank you so much

[@akshaykrishnak7696]

Thanks a lot mam for such a good explanation..

[@AryanSingh-zw2if]

Thanks mam

[@abuhuraira3858]

Thanks

[@almidahngwenyama9364]

you are a star, thanks a lot

[@chhavi069]

Thank u ma'am😊

[@Bicycle.dreaming]

Thank you so much Ma'am!

[@DanielSColao]

Great video!
Thanks!

[@meltmks]

where is the left proofs ???

[@ankitraina4047]

litt..thanks

[@surendraediga7607]

really more helpfull thanks a lot

[@Soosnathan]

Right?^^

[@qwertysingh3229]

ye associative law hai , distributive nhi

[@anugrahmasih6347]

Wrong method, we have to prove that both of them are subset of each other

[@toptrendenglishsongs4034]

i agree

[@boorlehemanth4518]

good explanation mam.

[@creative9605]

❤️❤️❤️

[@omgrider1339]

O

[@bushra7352]

I love you❤❤❤❤❤

[@nithishkumarmaari1209]

I love you

[@premkumar-fb4gt]

Thanks ur the gods for all

[@joeatethebeans1981]

🍪have a cookie :)

[@hudahuda5477]

thank you very much . but can't you a proof the other sides . I mean the left and right . thank you again

[@adeldaman]

Its the same thing backwards once you prove one side....

[@hudahuda5477]

Adel El-Frih oh.thanx😊

[@EsperanceBG]

thank you!

[@rajaryanagrawal1207]

how do u prove
(a n b) u (a - b) = a

[@acidtoe1278]

probably too late but here goes
x e A and x e B or x e A and x e B'
which means
x e A and x e B or x e B'
(B or B' together create the universal set)
x e A and x e U (a intersection with universal set is equal to the first set)
x e A
therefore (a n b) u (a-b) is a subset of a
proving the other subset is just the reverse of all the steps

[@musaibmemon8412]

very clever people

[@ShivKumar-hj1ce]

You should also proved the conversely. Ok👍

[@charymn8947]

mam I hope this two laws may be correct but in NDA book as you told it is not there I have confused really can you clarify my doubt please please help me from my trouble

[@surendraediga7607]

commutative law
associative law
identity law
complement law
double complement law
universal bonds law
absarption law
set difference law
should be explained by u it will be more helpful for us pls mam load that video early

[@ShivKumar-hj1ce]

you have not completely proved this law

[@Follow_the_damn_train]

Thank you ❤️❤️

[@gnation855]

Thanks