"Remove Not the Ancient Landmarks" - Dr. Clarence Sexton (Video 1992)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 дек 2024

Комментарии • 18

  • @crownuk4867
    @crownuk4867 Месяц назад

    Well done thou good and faithful servant

  • @jdgill-u2s
    @jdgill-u2s 5 месяцев назад +1

    He did stay true to the end of his life. That's to be commended.

  • @CDaniel1996
    @CDaniel1996 11 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you for posting this.

  • @dannydubs01
    @dannydubs01 7 месяцев назад

    Convicting sermon about the importance of staying true to the Word

  • @kdeh21803
    @kdeh21803 8 месяцев назад

    It is just amazing how he takes a phrase from a verse that really refers to boundaries on owned real estate and not stealing land that is not owned by a person and goes on and on regarding that phrase and tells us it is really something different that we need to adhere to.......................

    • @jonslagill8864
      @jonslagill8864 7 месяцев назад

      28 Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set.
      1. We are here taught not to invade another man's right, though we can find ways of doing it ever so secretly and plausibly, clandestinely and by fraud, without any open force. Let not property in general be entrenched upon, by robbing men of their liberties and privileges, or of any just ways of maintaining them. Let not the property of particular persons be encroached upon. The land-marks, or meer-stones, are standing witnesses to every man's right; let not those be removed quite away, for thence come wars, and fightings, and endless disputes; let them not be removed so as to take from thy neighbour's lot to thy own, for that is downright robbing him and entailing the fraud upon posterity. 2. We may infer hence that a deference is to be paid, in all civil matters, to usages that have prevailed time out of mind and the settled constitutions of government, in which it becomes us to acquiesce, lest an attempt to change it, under pretence of changing it for the better, prove of dangerous consequence.

    • @kdeh21803
      @kdeh21803 7 месяцев назад

      @@jonslagill8864 What he is referring to here is about one English Translation of Scripture done more than 400 years ago and it has nothing to do with that. A translation is not inspired, only the originals were.

    • @dannydubs01
      @dannydubs01 7 месяцев назад

      Where are the originals in there original form? Do you speak Koine Greek? "The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever." Psalm 12 6-7

    • @kdeh21803
      @kdeh21803 7 месяцев назад

      @@dannydubs01 What where the pure words before 1611? No one has been able to answer that question for me.....give me ALL the pure words from the 1st century..... Or are you not willing or able to do it?

    • @dannydubs01
      @dannydubs01 7 месяцев назад

      God preserved His Word for all generations. The language that the originals are in is no longer spoken and not accessible to the world. The English language is the language of the world. God *preserved* his Word through translation so that the world might know Him. This does require faith in God's ability to keep his promise. Even if this wasn't true, the KJB is still the best Bible. Language is devolving not evolving. The Old English captures the depth of meaning like our watered-down, modern English cannot